@scott michaels Have you studied Freud/ Psychology? He admits that most of his research was conducted in himself. It's sad that people like you are allowed to use the social media. You should be forced to read books and research websites only. You're a mess and you project your mess on here. Go away.
While you on the other hand were thrilled reading about how you wanted to sleep with your own mother. If you're a woman you were overjoyed learning about his concept of penis envy and so on. There are people who think child abuse should be legal. This also makes people mad. Does that mean they are right? Simply inciting an angry reaction from someone doesn't prove shit. You know what does? Science. You know what science said about psychoanalysis? Of course you do. We all do. And it's making psychoanalysists angry as fuck. Funny how that goes huh.
Notice OP makes an observation statement, not an argument, about how people's overaction entertains him. From that Rebecca Ohno creates an elaborate story on his motivation while lambasting him. Next, she creates a strawman of his post: observation statement is transformed into a weak argument which she then proceeds to "refute." The core pillar of psychoanalysis -- the unconscious, can say a lot about Rebecca.
Alexandrescu Maria Are you ESL? Seems like your reading comprehension skills are poor. Please read carefully next time. If you believe I'm mistaken, quote the exact part where I "blindly defended Freud." Also, please point out what about Freud that I defended exactly. Good luck.
A bloke named Freud, he wasn't always correct, he wasn't always happy, the path of least resistance, the pleasure principle, neuroses from oppression, from our childhood, blame bad parenting if life goes wrong, phases of life studied by Freud, the Freudian slip, difficult relationships for adults, wars and trouble attributed to this🚩✅💲
Me The 1th You should've wrote your joke something like this: "I met her last night and she's all tight - I mean all right." That would've been bootiful - I mean beautiful.
no matter what you do, you will form the basis for what your children perceive to be attractive (whether personality-wise or physically does not matter)
Dw most kids aren't like that lol. I mean I don't think I was ever attracted to my mom, in fact I still think she's ugly af now. I blame her for the genes. (Sorry Mom)
When Freud started working, women (and sometimes men) told him that their fathers (usually) had had sex with them and Freud did what people still do today when incest is reported - he disbelieved them. He didn't want to believe that highly respectable men in their expensive suits and top hats had committed those crimes so he betrayed his patients by creating a theory that the children had invented daydreams arising out of their wish to have sex with their parents. So I believe that the Oedipus complex is a huge deception and a betrayal of the victims of incest who wanted to tell him what had happened to them. Freud may also have been reluctant to believe these very distressing stories because of his situation as a Jew in an anti-Semitic world. He had seen his father often being forced off the pavement onto the road by respectable men who wanted to humiliate his father. Freud vowed that he would never step aside like his father had done but the Oedipus complex theory is exactly that - Freud being too intimidated by these racist and powerful people to face up to the truth of what his patients were telling him. And well he might have been afraid. Freud was able to escape to Britain during World War II - though there was anti-Semitism there, too - but his sisters were imprisoned in Auschwitz where they died. Freud was puzzled by the way he sometimes fainted when he met a highly respectable man. Very likely he searched among his theories of childhood trauma to explain it, but I think when he met those very respectable men, he knew instinctively what a thin veneer that respectability was. Antisemitism and racism weren't just German/Austrian problems. They were problems in most nations. In his autobiography, Hans Christian Anderson, that very nice man who wrote "The Little Match Girl" to encourage compassion towards the poor, wrote dismissively about a group of poor Jewish people he noticed on his travels. That kind of ugliness can be just below the surface of many a well-dressed person so Freud's fainting was probably an intuitive response to the kind of horror which later killed his sisters. Thus I don't blame Freud for recoiling from the stories of incest. They are after all absolutely appalling. However, I am glad that now people are more willing to listen respectfully to those who are the victims of domestic violence and to support them in having safe, healthy lives.
I started reading *Sigmund Freud's work when I was 13* and since then I started understanding more and more psychoanalysis and use it in most of life's occasions. I also help out friends with analysing their inner cores. Despite the negative comments about Freud, I still love his way of thinking and discovering solutions to out lives.
I really dont understand why anyone would have anything against these theories. They make so much sense to me. From things Ive seen around me, its like I have personally witnessed each one of these theories. Even in my own personal life.
@@LosantoBeats because they are deeply irrational and unscientific. Freudian theoires are unfalsifiable (the most important thing for a scientific theory is to be falsifiable), Freud barely did any research or tested any of his theories. He actually, simply made them up. So "sometimes he's right" but he arrived at correct conclusions (even that is very arguable) through wrong methods. Like asking what 1+1 is, rolling a dice and getting 2. You would be "correct", but you sure as hell don't know anything about adding numbers. You just got lucky. Check out a video called "Frederick Crews - why Freud is a fraud", it's a long discussion but it should make people's dislike of Freud clear to you.
Through years of studying psychology I have learned to really appreciate Freud and his ideas (even though they sound crazy at the surface). He was the first person to touch upon what we now know as cognitive dissonance; the great discomfort of holding conflicting attitudes, which drives us to irrational behaviours over and over again. My fellow psychology undergraduates tend to dismiss him as a crackhead and a scam, but even though his reasoning was a little bit wack, some of his conclusions were indeed appropriate, and with modern cognitive psychology we are now discovering that fact.
Psychology 101 right here. 'his reasoning was wack' but we will keep looking for other paradigms untill one fits the Freudian one. That's why it will never be a science.
Story is true, but she actually said to him"the fucking door is wet" meaning the floor, he understood her pussy, and after the slip he came up with a new term.
Andy Brice 'One problem was that no one could identify sperm or eggs in eels. Over a 40-year period in the late 1700s, at the famous eel fishery at Comacchio, Italy, more than 152 million adult migratory eels were caught and cleaned, not one of which was found carrying eggs. No one could say for sure whether eels even had gender, because no one could identify their reproductive organs. (It turns out that the sex organs of eels become enlarged with eggs and sperm only after the adults leave the mouths of rivers for their oceanic spawning grounds and disappear from sight.'
Freud had a difficult life. He was rejected by everyone in his field. He CREATED the field of psychology. His work and then break with Jung was the great schism of our current age.
@@maguimasante9596 Freud theorised that all small boys select their mother as their primary object of desire. They subconsciously wish to usurp their fathers and become their mothers' lover. Typically, these desires emerge between the ages of three and five, when a boy is in what Freud defined as the "phallic" stage of development.
Honestly when you go on TikTok the amount of comments that are just 20 something men talking about "mommy milkies" or Weird mommy dom shit in general is enough to vindicate Freud 1000 times over.
because you're getting the interpretation all wrong it's not sexualizing in the way we adults understand it, like the physical need to have sex, it's a child adapted way of explaining it. it's like giving a name to the nature that is wanting to be fed. it's not LITERAL
@@auzzpanda3497 Yes it is. And saying the Oedipus complex isn't literal and trying to deny that it very much can be a literal thing ironically misses Freud's point. He developed the Oedipus complex to explain to people that our assumptions that the default state of a parent/child relationship is what is societally called normal or wholesome is a terribly wrong idea. The Oedipus complex's point ISN'T that all kids want to bone their parents. The point is to get psychologists and everyday people to stop and examine the true nature of their relationship with their parents. Instead of just denying that a sexual/romantic attraction may be there, Freud wants us to see if there is one. Acceptance of an issue will always cause you to deal with it in a healthier way than simply denying the issue is there.
Because Jung isn't commonly taught in all schools, more and more people immerse themselves in politics without any self-awareness. The Internet lives on tribal mammalian politics because it's pleasurable. If the ideas of Jung are forgotten, it will result in a catastrophe.
I think that we are motivated in part by a desire for pleasure but we also want to have meaning in our lives. People often make a huge effort over a long period to create a sense of being part of a meaningful reality. We also get a feeling of meaning by being part of a group of family members and friends. Participating in their lives as well as our own, gives us both pleasure and a feeling of meaning. It also provides interest which is another driving force. We love to have quite a few patterns and some predictability in our lives but we also thrive on variation and the stimulation of change. Many people also are driven by a desire to learn more. Learning has a practical benefit but it also exercises our brain which can feel great and enable us to form a more meaningful and manageable picture of our world. Freud talked about the conscience as a superego but I think that our sense of right and wrong forms a useful guide to help us to relate to others in our community in a workable way. Of course our conscience can become overly prescriptive and that can become too worrying but if kept in balance, it can be helpful to us.
This is one of my favorite topics to share in college class. I realized that I had been mispronouncing a few terms too. This is a good correction to tell to my students before it's too late. This video also broadens more of my learning about Freud's theory. Thank you very much for sharing this video! :) God bless!
Quite a lot of people feel very passionately about freud being a crackpot, but he did offer many great insights into how our tendencies throughout our lives express themselves, and he had many ideas that have since been expanded on and improved for modern day psychoanalysis and therapy. To dismiss him and his ideas outright is not the correct reaction.
I have to say that I defiantly partially agree with this! The only part where I disagree is where you say that it is not the correct reaction, and only because I think maybe we can agree to disagree and simply that.
@Juan Martin: read up before you open your mouth, cocaine is a very effective local aneasthetic and is still occasionally used in nasal surgeries, since its additional vasoconstrictive properties prevent excessive bleeding.
These theories make so much sense to me. I feel like Ive witness examples of each one of his theories through out my life. Either through me or people around me. Ive known about their upbringing and know them as adults and I see the patterns.
Freud "stepped onto the moon" with his work. He tackled the hardest part of being human, accepting everyone else has pretty much the same problems and ideas without acting like we dont. He suffered from nothing but being too sane in a world of willingly crazy people. We all know in the back of our minds he's right....as did he.
the irony here is the best thing abt some of his theories are that they're wrong, and by proving that he's wrong, people are finding out what's essentially right.
@@hedoingitsideways well this video didnt show ALL of his theories though, you're not a freud expert just because you watched this video, he had some pretty reasonable theories, altough i have to admit, most of the ones in this video are pretty stupid
So many people failed to see the complexy of Freud psychoanalysis theory. Perhaps his theory were a bit bizarre at times but his thought process and ability to rational thing was what made him famous in my opinion, it's just amazing to read his books. His level of understaning of the mind was incredible. I read somewhere that "words aren't enough to describe what really goes in your head sometimes". His work is not meant to be taken literally in my opinion it's just very thought provikikg and making us he self aware. Something we need nowdays.
An excellent little intro. If you’ve only got 7 minutes and 20 seconds, you’d be hard pressed to find anything better. Packs a lot in to that time. And so much more to explore. What a fascinating man and such brilliant insight.
+But Israeli Funny Freudian psychology mixed with extreme industrialization, authoritarianism, consumerism and systematic media control. Huxley's dystopia was based upon a government which controlled its populous through the exploitation of their Id; Orwell's dystopia was based upon a government which controlled its populous through the exploitation of their Superego. Huxley's dystopia controlled the populous with pleasure, Orwell's with fear. If given the choice, I'd go with Huxley.
+C. C. Prasad its mostly because psychology by a large have moved on from many of his ideas and theories. That would at least be the more rational way of saying it. I an not saying psychoanalyst is not something that is not vaild anymore - it very much is, but even within the school of psychoanalysis, there have come alot of new ideas and thinkers since.
C. C. Prasad haha thats a funny one :D no, more like someone who lay the fundation for a way of thinking that have now evolved very much, in such a way that current teachers of psychoanalysis view him as outdated. Like a nokia phone :P (thats a joke too!)
Rex1987 Well at least he set the foundation for this field of study. I enjoyed his book "The Interpretation of Dreams" Very interesting information and philosophy I think. Nokia phone! Haha yes
Rex1987 It is said surrealism art movement was inspired by him, he influence Salvador Dali a lot. As a painter myself I am influence by Dali in surrealism too! :D
Fredrik Meyer Freud's nephew played a prominent role in having his uncle marketed in the U.S. by tying the credentialing of Analytic training schools to the study of Classic Psychoanalysis. Unfortunately, Jung didn't have his school promoted in the U.S. despite being infinitely more advanced conceptually.
+jaggo84 I think it's pretty clear. You make a mistake (slip) that reveals what your subconscious is thinking about. In the video, it gave the example of a person accidentally writing "thigh" (sexual desire) instead of "though".
i am about to go to university and study psichanalisys and i am really excited about all of this . besides i will learn from the best psicholog of my country .
Psychotherapy paves the way for both interpersonal and intrapersonal analysis of the human mind. The theory could be a straight forward address to a large number of people with mental health problems. “People can apply this to uncover what ails them and can use it uncover reality”. Freud also talked about dreams as wish fulfillments which could be a possible hint that in our dreams lie the best path in front of us. It might be for the same reason that many great thinkers of the past exhorted us to dream our way to success.
This man had many interesting insights, nevertheless. I briefly learnt about him at high school but I think I will pick up one of his books in the near future.
He saw his parents having sex as a child and perceived as his father being violent towards his mother which aroused him. He wanted to marry his mom and saw his dad as competition .
Although I don't agree with all of Freud's theory but I agree with his theory of pleasure principle and reality principle part because I feel as humans we are always running for things that make us happy and trying to satisfy our needs.
First of all his quality is already dope . So isn't it useless to talk about pop filter . If someone is doing a cringe content with great audio quality than what is the point of being good at sound production ? I think first point of making a good video is quality content than other stuffs come Actually
+academicned6 No, I think the oedipus complex does exist. Many girls I know said they used to have a father crush when they were younger. And the phallic stage may be true. I'm pretty sure when I was 5ish I was very sexually frustrated.
+Belezcatligur Mastepoca well none of his stuff is proven.. actually i think nearly all of his theories were DISPROVEN. freud isn't science, he is great story telling at best.
+Belezcatligur Mastepoca Well, depends from person to person, but the idea is that when you love someone, you tend to please them wherever possible. And its kinda hard to have sex when you are focused on your partners pleasure rather than yours.
D.I. L.F You may want to ask yourself is the source of that boredom is not coming from somewhere else. Our life as a whole is reflected in our sexlife. Are you satisfied with your job? Do you feel successful? Are you happy with the nurturing your friends and family give you? Are you excited about the future? If your life is boring, and then you find a partner to love and have sex with, you will find excitement for a while. But then, when you get used to it, if you haven´t changed anything else in your life at all besides that girlfriend, you will become bored again. Then having sex with another person will look attractive. But that will not give you real pleasure and love. Love is not tied to sex. Sex is tied to love. The real attractive in sex is actually a deep love wanting to be awakened. But to truly love, you must first love yourself. If you do not love yourself, and are not happy with the life you are forging for yourself, you will not be able to love another. Its easy to blame our partners and not blame ourselves. Then you will end up switching partners again and again never being really fulfilled or happy. Great sex comes from deep love, and that is forged through mutual growth with a single partner, over long periods of time. The kind of sexual attraction this video talks about is really superficial and shallow. Why does it make sense then? Because it applies to most people. Because most people are not fulfilled with their lives, lack selflove, and are bored. Thus, cannot forge a truly deep loving relationship. Thus their sex life appear to become more and more bad. And they blame the partner. Or in the case of this video, they blame love itself. Ridiculous.
I had a Freudian slip when I wrote in my Google search bar, "fuck" in front of my mom when she asked me to search for something for her. I never cuss in front of her so it was awkward.
I am excited at the prospect of new and interesting content on philosophy both analytical and continental. The condensed yet comprehensive nature of your content is top drawer paralleled only by such channels as Kurzgesagt, Crash course, CGP Grey, Minute Physics etc. However, why no mention of Freud's androcentrism? I can understand the desire to teach the content not the controversy, but a small mention of it toward the end of the 6th minute might have helped to properly balance out a Freudian perspective. Granted anyone interested could, just as easily, gain awareness of that critique after a quick net search others may feel further research is unnecessary given the presumed well-rounded nature of your exposition. This is a strong presentation and, mine is a weak criticism. Thank you for your work.
Alain de Botton Gotta check those channels then. Have you seen The Economics of Happiness or any speeches by Helena Norberg-Hodge? It presents the idea of economic localization instead of globalization. What are your thoughts on this? Thanks.
***** I think the distance from the microphone is fine, the lack of a "pop filter" is what's causing the mic's diaphragm to freak out a little when the VA is saying his P's and such.
can you guys invest in one of those microphone pop filters or perhaps move away from the microphone a few inches, its sounds like your spitting into the mic and its distracting. otherwise thanks for the vids...
Every time you call your boyfriend "daddy" Freud's soul grow a little stronger.
Alen Ožegović 😂😂
Saw this on tumblr
😂😂😂😂
Man, this sucks that I get this 😂
Ivory MacCracken-Sanders he did, he even termed it as "electra complex"
"Trying to sleep with other members of our own family"
that escalated quickly
😅🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Your comment literally made me L.o.L!
I think Freud was sexually abused by a parent, because he literally had no grounds for his theories.
haaaaaaaa
S O
@@sos1474 what is abuse
@scott michaels Have you studied Freud/ Psychology?
He admits that most of his research was conducted in himself.
It's sad that people like you are allowed to use the social media. You should be forced to read books and research websites only. You're a mess and you project your mess on here.
Go away.
"All family life is organized around the most damaged person in it."
~ Sigmund Freud
"All western family life is organized around the most person in it." -Sigmund Freud
OMG DO I RELATE
"Not everybodies family cares about the "damaged" person .
Damn
He was a fkn pedophile who used bs theories on the children he r*ped!!..#pedo
It's pretty entertaining that Freud's theories seem to make people unnecessarily mad, even today.
While you on the other hand were thrilled reading about how you wanted to sleep with your own mother. If you're a woman you were overjoyed learning about his concept of penis envy and so on.
There are people who think child abuse should be legal. This also makes people mad. Does that mean they are right? Simply inciting an angry reaction from someone doesn't prove shit. You know what does? Science. You know what science said about psychoanalysis? Of course you do. We all do. And it's making psychoanalysists angry as fuck. Funny how that goes huh.
Notice OP makes an observation statement, not an argument, about how people's overaction entertains him.
From that Rebecca Ohno creates an elaborate story on his motivation while lambasting him. Next, she creates a strawman of his post: observation statement is transformed into a weak argument which she then proceeds to "refute."
The core pillar of psychoanalysis -- the unconscious, can say a lot about Rebecca.
Rebecca Ohno I love you for speaking my mind so perfectly.
MrDashima It can also say a lot about you. And that is the fact that you are blindly defending your Freud daddy.
Alexandrescu Maria
Are you ESL? Seems like your reading comprehension skills are poor.
Please read carefully next time.
If you believe I'm mistaken, quote the exact part where I "blindly defended Freud."
Also, please point out what about Freud that I defended exactly.
Good luck.
If only he knew how many people today are called"daddy"
And no Mommy's in the house???
A bloke named Freud, he wasn't always correct, he wasn't always happy, the path of least resistance, the pleasure principle, neuroses from oppression, from our childhood, blame bad parenting if life goes wrong, phases of life studied by Freud, the Freudian slip, difficult relationships for adults, wars and trouble attributed to this🚩✅💲
"Adults are children that has become insane" - Sigmund Freud
+Henrik Jensen It's have. "Adults are children that HAVE become insane."
TheOwenator69 "Adulte are children WHO have become insane "
“A question that sometimes drives me hazy: am I or are the others crazy?” -Albert Einstein
adults is plural so they HAVE become and not HAS become
"Gucci Gang, Gucci Gang" - Lil Pump
This is probably the best, most calm and rational explanation of Freud's views I've found in a long while.
Calm? So....would you happen to drop the name of the chaotic ones...by any chance?
It's so entertaining gotta watch xD
So, a Freudian slip is when you say something but mean your mother... - I mean another...
+Herp Derpington Have you met my lovely smother...I mean mother.
+Pol Subanajouy Yes, just last night... i mean shes all right.
This is the kind of joke that doesn't make me laugh out loud, but impresses me with how clever it is.
Me The 1th You should've wrote your joke something like this: "I met her last night and she's all tight - I mean all right." That would've been bootiful - I mean beautiful.
MrJuha82 keep dreams away from real life.
next up on today’s episode of “i no longer want kids because i do not wish to be sexually longed for by my children”
no matter what you do, you will form the basis for what your children perceive to be attractive (whether personality-wise or physically does not matter)
Dw most kids aren't like that lol. I mean I don't think I was ever attracted to my mom, in fact I still think she's ugly af now. I blame her for the genes. (Sorry Mom)
@@rohilthomson IM SCREAMINGGGGGG
When Freud started working, women (and sometimes men) told him that their fathers (usually) had had sex with them and Freud did what people still do today when incest is reported - he disbelieved them. He didn't want to believe that highly respectable men in their expensive suits and top hats had committed those crimes so he betrayed his patients by creating a theory that the children had invented daydreams arising out of their wish to have sex with their parents. So I believe that the Oedipus complex is a huge deception and a betrayal of the victims of incest who wanted to tell him what had happened to them. Freud may also have been reluctant to believe these very distressing stories because of his situation as a Jew in an anti-Semitic world. He had seen his father often being forced off the pavement onto the road by respectable men who wanted to humiliate his father. Freud vowed that he would never step aside like his father had done but the Oedipus complex theory is exactly that - Freud being too intimidated by these racist and powerful people to face up to the truth of what his patients were telling him. And well he might have been afraid. Freud was able to escape to Britain during World War II - though there was anti-Semitism there, too - but his sisters were imprisoned in Auschwitz where they died. Freud was puzzled by the way he sometimes fainted when he met a highly respectable man. Very likely he searched among his theories of childhood trauma to explain it, but I think when he met those very respectable men, he knew instinctively what a thin veneer that respectability was. Antisemitism and racism weren't just German/Austrian problems. They were problems in most nations. In his autobiography, Hans Christian Anderson, that very nice man who wrote "The Little Match Girl" to encourage compassion towards the poor, wrote dismissively about a group of poor Jewish people he noticed on his travels. That kind of ugliness can be just below the surface of many a well-dressed person so Freud's fainting was probably an intuitive response to the kind of horror which later killed his sisters. Thus I don't blame Freud for recoiling from the stories of incest. They are after all absolutely appalling. However, I am glad that now people are more willing to listen respectfully to those who are the victims of domestic violence and to support them in having safe, healthy lives.
@@rohilthomson Jesus Christ
I started reading *Sigmund Freud's work when I was 13* and since then I started understanding more and more psychoanalysis and use it in most of life's occasions. I also help out friends with analysing their inner cores. Despite the negative comments about Freud, I still love his way of thinking and discovering solutions to out lives.
What books would you recommend?
I really dont understand why anyone would have anything against these theories. They make so much sense to me. From things Ive seen around me, its like I have personally witnessed each one of these theories. Even in my own personal life.
@@LosantoBeats I agree.
@@LosantoBeats because they are deeply irrational and unscientific. Freudian theoires are unfalsifiable (the most important thing for a scientific theory is to be falsifiable), Freud barely did any research or tested any of his theories. He actually, simply made them up. So "sometimes he's right" but he arrived at correct conclusions (even that is very arguable) through wrong methods.
Like asking what 1+1 is, rolling a dice and getting 2. You would be "correct", but you sure as hell don't know anything about adding numbers. You just got lucky.
Check out a video called "Frederick Crews - why Freud is a fraud", it's a long discussion but it should make people's dislike of Freud clear to you.
@@Stevinathomas you too, the comment I wrote above
Through years of studying psychology I have learned to really appreciate Freud and his ideas (even though they sound crazy at the surface). He was the first person to touch upon what we now know as cognitive dissonance; the great discomfort of holding conflicting attitudes, which drives us to irrational behaviours over and over again. My fellow psychology undergraduates tend to dismiss him as a crackhead and a scam, but even though his reasoning was a little bit wack, some of his conclusions were indeed appropriate, and with modern cognitive psychology we are now discovering that fact.
Agreed.
What conclusions might that be? That guy had serious issues with his sex drive to come up with such ideas.
Psychology 101 right here. 'his reasoning was wack' but we will keep looking for other paradigms untill one fits the Freudian one.
That's why it will never be a science.
Oh cool, what have your undergrad mates done for themselves to call one of the greats of the 20th century a fraud ? Typical college kids
@Juan Sierra so edgy bruh
“Out of your vulnerabilities, comes your strength.”
-Sigmund Freud
I heard a story about how Sigmund Freud's wife was mopping the floor, but forgot to tell him that the floor was wet.
He had a Freudian slip.
OMG lmao
Mr K this sir made my week roflmao
Story is true, but she actually said to him"the fucking door is wet" meaning the floor, he understood her pussy, and after the slip he came up with a new term.
this comment is genius
😂😂😂
How difficult can it be to locate an eel's reproductive organs?
yea all you gotta do is fuck it
stroke it long enough and you'll find out
Its an electric eel.
Muckie Marfe turn me on with your electric feel
Andy Brice 'One problem was that no one could identify sperm or eggs in eels. Over a 40-year period in the late 1700s, at the famous eel fishery at Comacchio, Italy, more than 152 million adult migratory eels were caught and cleaned, not one of which was found carrying eggs. No one could say for sure whether eels even had gender, because no one could identify their reproductive organs. (It turns out that the sex organs of eels become enlarged with eggs and sperm only after the adults leave the mouths of rivers for their oceanic spawning grounds and disappear from sight.'
yup childhood is damaging and makes us wierd and stressed true
...and functioning.
Yep it is the root
The Earth need more channel like this one.
So true.
Yes
Дали формата ја дава функцијата или обратно? 100th like by me for your post
Дали формата ја дава функцијата или обратно? 105
Check out pursuit of wonder and Academy of ideas
you speak clear english thank you..
***** do one on Jung - pretty please??
Melis Fidan fuck you
+xristos iligia no fuck your non existent brain
Melis Fidan He is from England.
Please watch my video titled:
"Why Modern Schooling Sucks"
ruclips.net/video/G2aHltwRmSE/видео.html
Freud had a difficult life. He was rejected by everyone in his field. He CREATED the field of psychology. His work and then break with Jung was the great schism of our current age.
Freud was a pervert and had sexual attraction towards his own mother, no wonder he had a difficult life.
@@paragkadam2169 did you meet him?
@@maguimasante9596 do some research and get some knowledge first before asking such silly questions
@@paragkadam2169 im literally studying to become a psychoanalyst, maybe you should do some research
@@maguimasante9596 Freud theorised that all small boys select their mother as their primary object of desire. They subconsciously wish to usurp their fathers and become their mothers' lover. Typically, these desires emerge between the ages of three and five, when a boy is in what Freud defined as the "phallic" stage of development.
1:18 pleasure principle
1:46 reality principle
1:51 neuroses
2:07 three parts of our minds
2:31 oral phase
2:52 anal phase
3:23 phallic phase
5:44 psychoanalysis
6:05 parapraxes
Hello churchill
GrumpyOldMan good one. Thanks 👌🏼
Thx
Parapraxes basically means typo right?
@@grimdhraa4623 well- no but also yes
And all this time I couldn't explain why 'mature', 'mom', 'mother catches son' and 'sister' were so popular
Exactly
could you elaborate pls
Haha
Honestly when you go on TikTok the amount of comments that are just 20 something men talking about "mommy milkies" or Weird mommy dom shit in general is enough to vindicate Freud 1000 times over.
Testimony to the brilliance of Freud's mind
Wow, this community is so mature. I was expecting some jokes.
This community is a good balance between commentary and memes, this is the ideal community for me.
@@aurelius-sparks fr the psychology community is one of the best out there
love the way you guys make videos!! so simple yet cool
+The School of Life wasn't he a racist scumbag?
jillaxx __ n
An intellectual giant , decades ahead of his time. Modern thinking is indebted to him.
Found this channel just now. Will binge until monday.
Enjoy!
The "children sexualizing their parents" part is pretty bonkers and unbelievable to me
because you're getting the interpretation all wrong it's not sexualizing in the way we adults understand it, like the physical need to have sex, it's a child adapted way of explaining it. it's like giving a name to the nature that is wanting to be fed. it's not LITERAL
@@auzzpanda3497 It can be literal if a child does not sexually develop properly.
@@lamestudiosinc418 ok cool not the topic at hand though
@@auzzpanda3497 Yes it is. And saying the Oedipus complex isn't literal and trying to deny that it very much can be a literal thing ironically misses Freud's point. He developed the Oedipus complex to explain to people that our assumptions that the default state of a parent/child relationship is what is societally called normal or wholesome is a terribly wrong idea. The Oedipus complex's point ISN'T that all kids want to bone their parents. The point is to get psychologists and everyday people to stop and examine the true nature of their relationship with their parents. Instead of just denying that a sexual/romantic attraction may be there, Freud wants us to see if there is one. Acceptance of an issue will always cause you to deal with it in a healthier way than simply denying the issue is there.
You are too constrained by your superego
Would you guys ever make a video about Carl Jung?
+The School of Life just dare we will enjoy it either way, and as epictetus would say: "don't worry about what you can't crontol"
+The School New subscriber here, why are are you guys reluctant to make a video about Carl Jung
+The School of Life Reluctant why? O:
+The School of Life Psychoanalysis has been severely criticised for NOT being a science. Jung's method and theory is. You just gotta read more.
+Max Calderon Jung is a different animal.
You guys must do one of this about Carl Jung.... you guys simply must!
I believe it's *motion*.
I concur with passion
Had same idea. Was looking for it, but I only found absence of it.
Because Jung isn't commonly taught in all schools, more and more people immerse themselves in politics without any self-awareness. The Internet lives on tribal mammalian politics because it's pleasurable. If the ideas of Jung are forgotten, it will result in a catastrophe.
"C.G. Jung." Then "Jung on the Shadow" PLEAAASE!!! OH PLEASE SOL! :)
please never stop the videos on this channel. they're just everything ive been looking for for far too long. there's just nothing like them
I think that we are motivated in part by a desire for pleasure but we also want to have meaning in our lives. People often make a huge effort over a long period to create a sense of being part of a meaningful reality. We also get a feeling of meaning by being part of a group of family members and friends. Participating in their lives as well as our own, gives us both pleasure and a feeling of meaning. It also provides interest which is another driving force. We love to have quite a few patterns and some predictability in our lives but we also thrive on variation and the stimulation of change. Many people also are driven by a desire to learn more. Learning has a practical benefit but it also exercises our brain which can feel great and enable us to form a more meaningful and manageable picture of our world. Freud talked about the conscience as a superego but I think that our sense of right and wrong forms a useful guide to help us to relate to others in our community in a workable way. Of course our conscience can become overly prescriptive and that can become too worrying but if kept in balance, it can be helpful to us.
“This is my new medicine, Psychoanalysis!”
“Freud, this is the seventh time this week you showed us psychoanalysis.”
It's amazing how much I can learn in just 7 min. Thank you so much in uploading them.
Definitely one of my fav. channels.
"We all must suffer one or two pains, the pain of discipline or the pain of regret." Jim Rohn
"no one who disdains the key will ever be able to unlock the door"
This is one of my favorite topics to share in college class. I realized that I had been mispronouncing a few terms too. This is a good correction to tell to my students before it's too late. This video also broadens more of my learning about Freud's theory. Thank you very much for sharing this video! :) God bless!
Quite a lot of people feel very passionately about freud being a crackpot, but he did offer many great insights into how our tendencies throughout our lives express themselves, and he had many ideas that have since been expanded on and improved for modern day psychoanalysis and therapy. To dismiss him and his ideas outright is not the correct reaction.
patrick kinnear I agree
Yes. I agree
I have to say that I defiantly partially agree with this! The only part where I disagree is where you say that it is not the correct reaction, and only because I think maybe we can agree to disagree and simply that.
would you be so kind to make a video about C.G. Jung please? It could be interesting..
one pseudoscientis is enough...
@Adnane TruthSeeker agreed, but still a fraud
"Would you kindly" huh, I see what you did here
I don't see anything wrong with him introducing cocaine to medicine.
@Juan Martin: read up before you open your mouth, cocaine is a very effective local aneasthetic and is still occasionally used in nasal surgeries, since its additional vasoconstrictive properties prevent excessive bleeding.
ledzepgirl92 thank you
And also focusing drugs for those with ADHD are made of cocaine
no your confusing that with amphetamines
Neither does the pharmaceutical industry; that's the reason why, if you're in pain; you can be prescribed: lidocaine, procaine, novacaine, etc...
Say what you want about freud being crazy! But from what I've seen, people's actions are best explained through psychoanalysis.
These theories make so much sense to me. I feel like Ive witness examples of each one of his theories through out my life. Either through me or people around me. Ive known about their upbringing and know them as adults and I see the patterns.
There is so much to learn about him and his teachings..
Freud "stepped onto the moon" with his work. He tackled the hardest part of being human, accepting everyone else has pretty much the same problems and ideas without acting like we dont. He suffered from nothing but being too sane in a world of willingly crazy people. We all know in the back of our minds he's right....as did he.
Fuck urself lolz damn idiot😁😁
the irony here is the best thing abt some of his theories are that they're wrong, and by proving that he's wrong, people are finding out what's essentially right.
I find them very reasonable
@@ahwabanmukherjeecse2206 Maybe you do but they're genuinely not lol
@@hedoingitsideways well this video didnt show ALL of his theories though, you're not a freud expert just because you watched this video, he had some pretty reasonable theories, altough i have to admit, most of the ones in this video are pretty stupid
Actually, if you look at them, most of his theories are not even falsifiable because of how much (subjective) symbolic interpretation they entail.
Woah, thats a very good perspective but you might be giving him more credit than due.
So many people failed to see the complexy of Freud psychoanalysis theory. Perhaps his theory were a bit bizarre at times but his thought process and ability to rational thing was what made him famous in my opinion, it's just amazing to read his books. His level of understaning of the mind was incredible. I read somewhere that "words aren't enough to describe what really goes in your head sometimes". His work is not meant to be taken literally in my opinion it's just very thought provikikg and making us he self aware. Something we need nowdays.
No one who thinks smoking a cigarette means you subconsciously want to suck a dick has a """DEEP MIND""". The dude was a Jew degenerate
An excellent little intro. If you’ve only got 7 minutes and 20 seconds, you’d be hard pressed to find anything better. Packs a lot in to that time. And so much more to explore. What a fascinating man and such brilliant insight.
your videos are how the schooling system should be. Keep up the great work
I appreciate the maker/s of this channel. :)
Alain de Botton OHH. It's youuu. Cooool.
Alright, I will! :)
Please make a video about Erik Erikson and his theory of personality
Sigmund’s mom has got it going on, she’s all he wants and he’s waited for so long.
The best ever explanation of psychoanalysis and psychotherapy!
Please make a video about B.F. Skinner and Behaviorism!
Can you do a video on Carl Jung?
***** As you should
***** I'd love to see your video on him, with your reservations included.
Yes, please!!
Please watch my video titled:
"Why Modern Schooling Sucks"
ruclips.net/video/G2aHltwRmSE/видео.html
@Jacob Louis @@@@@@@@@@@@@"e
Now I understand Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. They follow Freud's rules, only backwards :P
Chris Paine Just what I was thinking.
+But Israeli Funny Freudian psychology mixed with extreme industrialization, authoritarianism, consumerism and systematic media control. Huxley's dystopia was based upon a government which controlled its populous through the exploitation of their Id; Orwell's dystopia was based upon a government which controlled its populous through the exploitation of their Superego. Huxley's dystopia controlled the populous with pleasure, Orwell's with fear. If given the choice, I'd go with Huxley.
+But Israeli Funny explain please
Why all the Freud hate though. Seems like he wasn't the only one who has mommy issues.
+C. C. Prasad its mostly because psychology by a large have moved on from many of his ideas and theories. That would at least be the more rational way of saying it. I an not saying psychoanalyst is not something that is not vaild anymore - it very much is, but even within the school of psychoanalysis, there have come alot of new ideas and thinkers since.
Rex1987
I see. So he's like an outdated cell phone. =P
C. C. Prasad haha thats a funny one :D
no, more like someone who lay the fundation for a way of thinking that have now evolved very much, in such a way that current teachers of psychoanalysis view him as outdated. Like a nokia phone :P (thats a joke too!)
Rex1987
Well at least he set the foundation for this field of study. I enjoyed his book "The Interpretation of Dreams" Very interesting information and philosophy I think. Nokia phone! Haha yes
Rex1987
It is said surrealism art movement was inspired by him, he influence Salvador Dali a lot. As a painter myself I am influence by Dali in surrealism too! :D
I like Freud more than Jung.
People keep hating on him but he makes a lot of sense for people with issues.
Are you studying psychology?? If so please recommend me the books for beginners.. I find these books quite complicated to read and interpret
I hope you do one on Carl Jung!
Good video also.
me too, I always preferred Jung
Fredrik Meyer Freud's nephew played a prominent role in having his uncle marketed in the U.S. by tying the credentialing of Analytic training schools to the study of Classic Psychoanalysis. Unfortunately, Jung didn't have his school promoted in the U.S. despite being infinitely more advanced conceptually.
It wasn't totally clear what you meant by Freudian slip. I wonder if a psycho the rapist could explain it...
+jaggo84 I think it's pretty clear. You make a mistake (slip) that reveals what your subconscious is thinking about. In the video, it gave the example of a person accidentally writing "thigh" (sexual desire) instead of "though".
jaggo84 Oh. I feel silly now. I'm such a -tit- twat.
u need non-skids mate
Noice
noice meat
I am going bananas with these videos of yours
i am about to go to university and study psichanalisys and i am really excited about all of this . besides i will learn from the best psicholog of my country .
Happy birthday, Sigmund.
Your videos are amazing! Really great job
This explains why in relationships we often date people who act like your parents
Very interesting. please make a video about Carl Jung.
"All family life is organized around the most damaged person in it."
~ Sigmund Freud
Psychotherapy paves the way for both interpersonal and intrapersonal analysis of the human mind. The theory could be a straight forward address to a large number of people with mental health problems. “People can apply this to uncover what ails them and can use it uncover reality”. Freud also talked about dreams as wish fulfillments which could be a possible hint that in our dreams lie the best path in front of us. It might be for the same reason that many great thinkers of the past exhorted us to dream our way to success.
It would be nice if you make a video of Carl Gustav Jung
The most important thing you need to know about Jung is that he was full of shit. Once you know this, all will be well.
A true genius that transcends most other geniuses of his age. His work is critical for understanding psycho therapy and how to help heal humanity.
Me:Studies psychology
RUclips suggestion: I got you!!
This man had many interesting insights, nevertheless. I briefly learnt about him at high school but I think I will pick up one of his books in the near future.
ik this is kinda late but i recently picked up his book on the interpretation of dreams and its a great read so far
they must have a large collection of vintage pictures
But they failed to show Mrs Freud
This is a great way to summarize big ideas. Please do one on Carl Jung
I really wonder how much of this was his own personal experiences & maybe his own way of dealing with how he felt as a kid
Exactly! Not everything he theorized needs to be taken as a fact!
He saw his parents having sex as a child and perceived as his father being violent towards his mother which aroused him. He wanted to marry his mom and saw his dad as competition .
@@ravanna9712 yeah that’s a yikes from me 🤢
I'm surprised you didn't mention his most famous quote: "Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar."
Lol when I first heard that quote I'm embarrassed to admit how long I thought about it
Although I don't agree with all of Freud's theory but I agree with his theory of pleasure principle and reality principle part because I feel as humans we are always running for things that make us happy and trying to satisfy our needs.
I am a psychology student and now I understand why this guy is termed "The Father of Modern Psychology"
Awesome channel!
I'd love to see a video about Bukowski, Kerouac, Ginsberg or Burroughs :)
Did you do a video on the Great Carl Jung?
you need to invest in a pop filter
L Lawliet Matters for all content. Especially great content. Invest in a pop-filter and give your content the audio quality it deserves
First of all his quality is already dope . So isn't it useless to talk about pop filter . If someone is doing a cringe content with great audio quality than what is the point of being good at sound production ? I think first point of making a good video is quality content than other stuffs come Actually
@@LLAWLIETkiracatcher what the hell is wrong with you? It was just some feedback, and I agree. Better sound quality would be worth investing in!
@@bartsmouter5926 it doesnt sound like a feedback. By the way stop licking others ass
@@LLAWLIETkiracatcher It’s exactly feedback. Stop being offended for other peoples asses
This man understood one thing..and it made it easy to read people..everyone speaks from the subconscious.
Honestly... we need more of these videos, an otherwise dry topic made interesting.
He made some amazing contributions
Could you do a video on Lacan's theory of ''otherness'' or ''das Andere'' and concept of the mirror stage?
We learned about this in my year 11 psychology class. People lost their shit over the Oedipus theory.
Im think we know by now that part is false, rigth?
+academicned6 No, I think the oedipus complex does exist. Many girls I know said they used to have a father crush when they were younger. And the phallic stage may be true. I'm pretty sure when I was 5ish I was very sexually frustrated.
@@meddog337 yeah…I don’t think many people wanna screw their dads.
@@clovermaid7099 i think yes, but theyre arent aware
10/10 video! So helpful, authoritative, and applicable. Thanks a lot for making this!
Imagine a world without children, future generations would thank us greatly!
I love this channel! :D Do one on Viktor Frankl!
I love Freud but can you guys do a video about Carl Jung
I don't agree at all at the part that says it becomes more difficult to make love to a person you start to love more.
+Belezcatligur Mastepoca well none of his stuff is proven.. actually i think nearly all of his theories were DISPROVEN. freud isn't science, he is great story telling at best.
+Belezcatligur Mastepoca Well, depends from person to person, but the idea is that when you love someone, you tend to please them wherever possible. And its kinda hard to have sex when you are focused on your partners pleasure rather than yours.
Samsung Galaxy
I agree.
The problem isn't loving "too much" the person then. It is a problem of self confidence, and unecessary pressure.
+Belezcatligur Mastepoca i definately love my girlfriend alot more than i used to, and she's quite hot by my previous standards but its boring as fuck
D.I. L.F
You may want to ask yourself is the source of that boredom is not coming from somewhere else. Our life as a whole is reflected in our sexlife. Are you satisfied with your job? Do you feel successful? Are you happy with the nurturing your friends and family give you? Are you excited about the future?
If your life is boring, and then you find a partner to love and have sex with, you will find excitement for a while. But then, when you get used to it, if you haven´t changed anything else in your life at all besides that girlfriend, you will become bored again. Then having sex with another person will look attractive. But that will not give you real pleasure and love.
Love is not tied to sex. Sex is tied to love. The real attractive in sex is actually a deep love wanting to be awakened. But to truly love, you must first love yourself. If you do not love yourself, and are not happy with the life you are forging for yourself, you will not be able to love another. Its easy to blame our partners and not blame ourselves. Then you will end up switching partners again and again never being really fulfilled or happy. Great sex comes from deep love, and that is forged through mutual growth with a single partner, over long periods of time.
The kind of sexual attraction this video talks about is really superficial and shallow. Why does it make sense then? Because it applies to most people. Because most people are not fulfilled with their lives, lack selflove, and are bored. Thus, cannot forge a truly deep loving relationship. Thus their sex life appear to become more and more bad. And they blame the partner. Or in the case of this video, they blame love itself.
Ridiculous.
Thanks forever, Alain🖤
1:18 that Keanu photo really got me...lmfao 🤣🤣
I had a Freudian slip when I wrote in my Google search bar, "fuck" in front of my mom when she asked me to search for something for her. I never cuss in front of her so it was awkward.
I am excited at the prospect of new and interesting content on philosophy both analytical and continental. The condensed yet comprehensive nature of your content is top drawer paralleled only by such channels as Kurzgesagt, Crash course, CGP Grey, Minute Physics etc.
However, why no mention of Freud's androcentrism? I can understand the desire to teach the content not the controversy, but a small mention of it toward the end of the 6th minute might have helped to properly balance out a Freudian perspective. Granted anyone interested could, just as easily, gain awareness of that critique after a quick net search others may feel further research is unnecessary given the presumed well-rounded nature of your exposition.
This is a strong presentation and, mine is a weak criticism. Thank you for your work.
Alain de Botton Gotta check those channels then.
Have you seen The Economics of Happiness or any speeches by Helena Norberg-Hodge? It presents the idea of economic localization instead of globalization. What are your thoughts on this? Thanks.
Sigmund Freud was a brilhant man still way ahead of his times.
With his whacky theories?
"Nobody who ever disdains the key can ever unlock the door."
~Freud~
Yup this is our lesson.
I would love to see one on Carl Jung also. :)
Good video, but you have the mic too close.
***** I think the distance from the microphone is fine, the lack of a "pop filter" is what's causing the mic's diaphragm to freak out a little when the VA is saying his P's and such.
***** I love the pops.
Padruig9 i didnt notice that, but now that u have pointed it out, i started getting annoyed by his videos
can you guys invest in one of those microphone pop filters or perhaps move away from the microphone a few inches, its sounds like your spitting into the mic and its distracting. otherwise thanks for the vids...
This video was very informative and I learned a lot from it about Freud.
This video had my full attention from start to finish. A rare thing these days...
Please, can you do one of these videos on Carl Jung!
why would they make jung video? the video maker is completely idolizing frued....god sake, btw, i really like jung.