Can you solve this in 10 SECONDS? - Calculate powers

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 23 янв 2025

Комментарии • 306

  • @MathQueenSusanne
    @MathQueenSusanne  12 дней назад +9

    Hey math friends! If you’re enjoying this video, could you double-check that you’ve liked it and subscribed to the channel? It’s a simple equation: your support + my passion = more great content! Thanks for helping me keep this going - you’re the best!

    • @oahuhawaii2141
      @oahuhawaii2141 9 дней назад

      2¹⁰⁰ - 2⁹⁹ = (2 - 1)*2⁹⁹ = 2⁹⁹ .
      But I'm not expanding that. I only know up to 2³² . I suppose I can figure out 2³³ , and cube it with a calculator:
      (2³³)³ = 8,589,934,592³ = 633,825,300,114,114,700,748,351,602,688 .

  • @rtxmax8223
    @rtxmax8223 17 дней назад +21

    i solved it just after watching the thumbnail within 5 secs, thanks to your videos now my brain is functioning at pace like it was 20 years ago.

    • @davidbrown8763
      @davidbrown8763 17 дней назад +3

      I also did it in my head. I agree that this lady is an excellent teacher, who so meticulously explains things.

    • @ComeinCiderbox
      @ComeinCiderbox 10 дней назад

      yeah thanks Poindexter

  • @igormiovski1803
    @igormiovski1803 17 дней назад +33

    Just remember, with great power comes great responsibility

    • @LucaC-dk7tk
      @LucaC-dk7tk 16 дней назад +4

      Nice one:)

    • @antoinegrassi3796
      @antoinegrassi3796 3 дня назад

      @@igormiovski1803 autant rester stupide, c'est tellement plus simple. Votre phrase sonne bien, mais elle est juste idiote.

  • @feerrnn
    @feerrnn 17 дней назад +25

    Easy to understand and simple as always. Thanks, Susanne.

  • @k5555-b4f
    @k5555-b4f 17 дней назад +11

    I appreciate your confidence in humanity when you said ‘let me know which method you used to solve this’ 😅

  • @JpP-b1q
    @JpP-b1q 17 дней назад +5

    I am trying to get another brain cell working. That way they can both get some company.
    And your videos are helping with just the right amount of explanation.
    Thank you your majesty. 🇬🇧

  • @kamae79
    @kamae79 17 дней назад +11

    What I did is replace 2⁹⁹ by a variable. Let's say "a", on the second line. Then you can see 2a-a which is clearly a.

  • @MladenDaBoss
    @MladenDaBoss 17 дней назад +1

    First time I saw this type of question, I solved it in 3 seconds. Now I can solve it in 3 milliseconds. PURE GENIUS!!!

  • @SudeeptaChakraborty
    @SudeeptaChakraborty 17 дней назад +16

    Multiplying something by 2, doubles the number and when you subtract a number from its double, you get back the same number. In this case 2^100 is simply double of 2^99, so if you subtract 2^99 from it you will end up with 2^99.

  • @professor_stevens6784
    @professor_stevens6784 13 дней назад

    My solution was exactly like yours, though the outcome initially surprised me. Note that the problem can be generalized to
    a^(n+1) - a^n = aa^n -a^n = a^n(a - 1). It's convenient that when a = 2, the (a - 1) term is just one, so it disappears.

  • @jamessorrel
    @jamessorrel 17 дней назад +5

    Very good short math video to watch in the morning and jog the brain

  • @walternps1615
    @walternps1615 3 дня назад +1

    I used the second method. 2⁹⁹ is the half of 2¹⁰⁰. Nice video!

  • @jayjett3994
    @jayjett3994 6 дней назад

    This blew me away. I'm very good at math and totally got the wrong answer at first attempt. Wow love your videos

  • @jeanlemire2681
    @jeanlemire2681 2 дня назад

    Another way is to use x = 2^100 - 2^99. Divide both sides of the equation by 2^99 to get x / 2^99 = 2^100 / 2^99 - 2^99 / 2^99 which becomes x / 2^99 = 2 -1 or x = 2^99 = 1 then x = 2^99.

  • @cognitivefailure
    @cognitivefailure 16 дней назад

    I watch these videos mostly to get to the end where she smiles and wishes us a wonderful day. 😁Okay, I'm exaggerating a little, but it is a very welcome touch.

  • @viertelelf
    @viertelelf День назад

    My solution was very short and easy. 2^100=2*2^99, 2^99 =1x2^99, 2x2^99-1x2^99 =1x2^99. Done.

  • @wernerschwarze910
    @wernerschwarze910 6 дней назад +1

    substitution of 2 to the power of 99 by a gives: 2a-1a=a and the reverse substitution of a thus: 2 to the power of 99

  • @kybalion1367
    @kybalion1367 17 дней назад +57

    A= 1,267,650,600,228,229,401,496,703,205,376 - 633,825,300,114,114,700,748,351,602,688 = 633,825,300,114,114,700,748,351,602,688
    Easy peasy.

    • @ManishBhandari5
      @ManishBhandari5 17 дней назад

      🤯🤯

    • @DonShoemaker-b6o
      @DonShoemaker-b6o 17 дней назад +2

      Wow you must have a super calculator that goes out that many places. 😮

    • @kenhaley4
      @kenhaley4 17 дней назад +2

      @@DonShoemaker-b6o No, in Python it's just one line of code:
      print(f"{2**99:,}")
      Result:
      633,825,300,114,114,700,748,351,602,688

    • @DonShoemaker-b6o
      @DonShoemaker-b6o 17 дней назад +1

      ​@@kenhaley4Thanks for letting me know.

    • @Redstoner34526
      @Redstoner34526 17 дней назад +2

      Thanks that’s what I was looking for 🗣️🗣️🗣️

  • @84com83
    @84com83 День назад

    Probably something I learnt in school (1960-ies) but haven´t used since then. So nice for der (die oder das?) Erinnerung, Vielen Dank!

  • @nekogod
    @nekogod 17 дней назад +38

    Each power of 2 is double the previous one so 2^100 is 2*2^99 or 2^99+2^99 so 2^100-2^99 is 2^99

    • @Misteribel
      @Misteribel 17 дней назад +3

      As she said in the video 😅

    • @life_score
      @life_score 17 дней назад

      Thanks

    • @stephenpowell3334
      @stephenpowell3334 16 дней назад +2

      Fifty years ago I would have got this in an instant but time hasn’t been on my side…..applying the same principle 2cubed minus 2squared = 2squared….i can sleep easy now.

    • @nirmalfernando2829
      @nirmalfernando2829 12 дней назад

      omg..i got it noooow

  • @selahattinkara-o5h
    @selahattinkara-o5h 17 дней назад +2

    You give great lectures. I wish you success.

  • @Birol731
    @Birol731 17 дней назад +35

    My way of solution ▶
    2¹⁰⁰ - 2⁹⁹
    = 2⁹⁹(2¹ - 1)
    = 2⁹⁹(2 - 1)
    = 2⁹⁹

  • @robynrox
    @robynrox 17 дней назад +1

    No, not within 10 seconds, but then I thought about it and it took about 30 seconds while I was watching! My brain took your second approach!

  • @TheWolf-ws5dj
    @TheWolf-ws5dj 17 дней назад +5

    Calculate or simplify?

  • @alexserdukov1595
    @alexserdukov1595 День назад +1

    2^100 = 2^(99+1)=2*2^99. So 2^99 is 1/2 of 2^100. Something minus one half of something will be one half of something. So answer is 2^99 or 0b1(0….0) with 99 zeros

  • @Shay-q8u
    @Shay-q8u 15 дней назад

    I didn't utilize the a^m * a^n rule and just recognized that because the bases were the same I could just factor it to 2^99(2 - 1). (2-1) is (1) then x * 1 is just x. (x is the portion factored out. 2^99 in this case)

  • @snakejumper3277
    @snakejumper3277 17 дней назад

    I solved it using the intuitive method outlined at the end but appreciated seeing the factoring method.

  • @TorqueTheRich
    @TorqueTheRich 15 дней назад +1

    Susanne....you ROCK!!!

  • @andreas_b8527
    @andreas_b8527 7 дней назад

    I did it like you did at the end, but wasn't happy. I thought, that there had to come out a real value fast and easy.

  • @diepieche
    @diepieche 17 дней назад +1

    Slow learner like me need reasoning and explain. For me this is very good 👍👍👍.

  • @victorsauvage1890
    @victorsauvage1890 15 дней назад +1

    Very good explanation

  • @jeff-1weere
    @jeff-1weere 17 дней назад +2

    Three cheers for sequences and series.

  • @rich8037
    @rich8037 9 дней назад

    I solved that much your way and then, knowing that log(2)=0.301 (I'm an audio engineer, this is one of those things we just know, 'cos decibels), easily worked out that 2exp99=10exp29.8 which is roughly 6.5x10exp29. Anything much more accurate than that I'm clearly going to need a calculator or log tables, or some tricky longhand.

  • @NigelTolley
    @NigelTolley 16 дней назад

    Very neat.
    Easier way to explain it is to write out an example of 2^4 - 2^3, as 2.2.2.2 - 2.2.2, leaving 2, then solve by example.

  • @jonkreffer1671
    @jonkreffer1671 6 дней назад

    Well explained, thank you!

  • @JoostMehrtens
    @JoostMehrtens 17 дней назад +1

    2^100 =1024^10 or slightly more than 1,24 x 10^30
    2 ^99 =2^100 /2 or slightly more than 6,2 x 10^29

  • @labguru7628
    @labguru7628 17 дней назад

    I checked 2^4 - 2^3 = 16 - 8 = 8 = 2^3 and did it again for 2^5 - 2^4 = 2^4 and realized that the patten is that the answer would always be the 2^smaller power, meaning 2^99. Thanks for reminding me of the x^(a+b) = x^a * x^b.

  • @Clanjolu
    @Clanjolu 17 дней назад +1

    It's easy if you visualize the numbers in binary.
    2^99 is 1 followed by 99 zeroes, 2^100 is 1 followed by 100 zeroes.
    Adding 2^99 + 2^99 carries the leading 1 bit to the next position, equaling 2^100...

    • @RogerEvans-dx4cs
      @RogerEvans-dx4cs 11 дней назад +1

      Agree, that's what I did - much easier to visualise that way- my algebra is almost non-existent.

  • @jimb1901
    @jimb1901 17 дней назад +1

    Some of your lovely’s are old enough to be your dad. lol. I enjoy so much your detail in solving the equations. Thanks

  • @ashtullview
    @ashtullview 11 дней назад

    Well explianed and solved

  • @djparn007
    @djparn007 17 дней назад +6

    Thank you, Susanne❤❤❤

  • @pawcityeve
    @pawcityeve 17 дней назад

    Easy One! I understood everything Thanks!

  • @johnporcella2375
    @johnporcella2375 17 дней назад +2

    I looked at 2^3 - 2^2 and noted that this was 8 - 4, giving 4, ie 2^2, the second term.
    Did the same with 2^4 - 2^3, making 16 - 8, ie 8, which is 2^3, again the second term.
    So, in that basis, the answer had to be 2^99.

    • @labguru7628
      @labguru7628 17 дней назад

      I did basically the same thing.

    • @gilwestfall9155
      @gilwestfall9155 10 дней назад

      Yep that is how I attacked it as well. 2^2 - 2^1 =2 or 2^1, 2^3 - 2^2=4 or 2^2, 2^4 - 2^3 =8 or 2^3. That’s enough of a pattern for me.

  • @elharratimohamed2332
    @elharratimohamed2332 3 дня назад

    Merci bien Professore

  • @thenetsurferboy
    @thenetsurferboy 11 дней назад

    You are the one that does not scribble
    The one that rightly puts = under =
    But no need for the second line
    Just take out the 2 to power 99 from the first line to get
    2 ^99[2 -1
    = 2^99

  • @brainfellow5140
    @brainfellow5140 17 дней назад

    Hello, new sub here. Love the channel and the material you present. All the best to you!
    3:20 I solved it using this alternative method, but the factoring method works very well too.

  • @loonyt22
    @loonyt22 17 дней назад

    in my head I came up with 2^99 = (2^10)^9*(2^9) = 1024^9*512. 1024 is approx 1000+2%, 512 is approx 500+2%, so 2^99 = 500 followed by 27 zeros +a little over 20% so a little over 600,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 , which is not far off.

  • @louisthomasic275
    @louisthomasic275 3 дня назад

    It is not a matter of solving but of calculating, and what is the value of 2^99 ?

  • @i12cu2
    @i12cu2 7 дней назад

    Ha ha, Susanne ist die Meth Queen 😂🤣
    Viel Erfolg mit deinem "international channel"!

  • @charlesrothauser1328
    @charlesrothauser1328 16 дней назад +2

    You can factor 2^99 immediately, this implies 2^99(2 - 1) implies 2^99 * 1 = 2^99

  • @mitcoes
    @mitcoes 15 дней назад

    Faster:
    /2"99
    or multiply by 2^-99
    (and multiply it later)

  • @frankteunissen6118
    @frankteunissen6118 17 дней назад +11

    I think that it would be really helpful for maths students if, instead of just presenting it as a rule, you’d explain WHY x^(a+b) = x^a . x^b. Teaching maths should be about ensuring that students understand why things are as they are, otherwise it’ll go in one ear and out the other.

    • @markthompson2874
      @markthompson2874 17 дней назад +1

      But then she should explain that 2^99 = 2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2 and then explain the commutative property of multiplication. By the time we're done explaining, we'll have a 2 hour video.

    • @arkadeusz91
      @arkadeusz91 16 дней назад

      It's true that it is better to know why something works the way it does, but there are already so many sources that you can find that info that repeating it in every math video would be counterproductive. If you were a teacher and introduced the subject to your class then that would be important that you explain why it works. But if you do a 1000000th video about the same topic it seems redundant. It's the same with Pythagorean theorem or difference of squares. But it is always ok to ask, so if you want explaination I would gladly provide 😊

    • @LeithYearwood
      @LeithYearwood 16 дней назад +1

      2^3+4 = 2^7. Same as (2x 2x2x2x2x2x2) = (2×2×2) ×(2×2×2×2) = (2^3)x (2^4) or x^3+4 = (x^3) × (x^4)

    • @carenlettofsky3045
      @carenlettofsky3045 15 дней назад +1

      Math teacher here. I DO explain why the rules are what they are. I tell my students "Let's look at what's going on behind the math curtain."

  • @przemysawpakua9619
    @przemysawpakua9619 16 дней назад

    Dear Susanne,
    Could you please share which electronic board you are using?
    Best regards,
    Przemek

  • @turkergirgin2469
    @turkergirgin2469 10 дней назад

    i have just seen you and your channel so you are not queen that you are an angel escaped from paradise as my opinion

  • @gregm5775
    @gregm5775 10 дней назад

    Hello, thanks for your videos! I solved this the lazy way: the first number is twice the second number, so the subtraction leaves us with 2^99... May I also propose the word maths instead of math? regards

  • @tylerlarsen1842
    @tylerlarsen1842 17 дней назад

    2^(n+1)-2^(n)=2^n for all n, so 2^100-2^99=2^99

  • @RyanLewis-Johnson-wq6xs
    @RyanLewis-Johnson-wq6xs 16 дней назад +1

    2^100-2^99=633,825,300,114,114,700,748,351,602,688=2^99 It’s in my head.

  • @antoinegrassi3796
    @antoinegrassi3796 12 дней назад

    - Pourquoi ne pas écrire directement que mettre 2^99 en facteur, reviens à soustraire 99 de chaque exposant:
    2^100 - 2^99 = 2^99 ( 2^1- 2^0) = 2^99 (2- 1) = 2^99. C'est en transmettant ces petites techniques de calcul que l'on fait progresser nos élèves.
    - On peut aussi remarquer que 2^100 est le double de 2^99, et que "DEUX PATATES " moins "UNE PATATE " égale "UNE PATATE ".

  • @johnnorton3945
    @johnnorton3945 16 дней назад

    I used the second way: 2^100 = 2 * 2^99 and went from there. Not sure if I finished in under 10 seconds but it wasn’t much more than

  • @pauldalnoky6055
    @pauldalnoky6055 17 дней назад

    Very good!

  • @hankdusommeil1065
    @hankdusommeil1065 13 часов назад

    I wonder if anybody who just started saw the solution 'intuitively'. I'm not ashamed to say I didn't.

  • @mirkhani1
    @mirkhani1 17 дней назад

    how much is 2^99?

  • @gedasgediminas3564
    @gedasgediminas3564 4 дня назад

    3^100-3^99=3*3^99-3^99=2*3^99.

  • @ronneff5894
    @ronneff5894 17 дней назад

    The way I solved it was 2^3 = 8 & 2^2 = 4...8-4 = 4...2^3 - 2^2 = 2^2. I did one or two more simple examples and it was the same pattern so.... 2^100 - 2^99 will = 2^99

  • @stevelloyd5785
    @stevelloyd5785 День назад

    Forget all the big exponents and just consider 2 squared and 2 cubed e.g. 2^2 and 2^3 and it becomes obvious.

  • @don911donny9
    @don911donny9 17 дней назад +2

    I recognised that 2^100 is twice 2^99 so therefore 2^99 is the remaining ‘half’ after subtraction.

    • @toby9999
      @toby9999 17 дней назад +1

      How did you recognise that? My first thought was that the answer would be 2. Obviously, it's wrong in hindsight.

    • @mikechappell4156
      @mikechappell4156 17 дней назад

      @@toby9999 I didn't remember the rule, but it is easy enough to work it out if you try a couple of simple examples like 2^3-2^2, 2^8-2^7, etc.
      It didn't occur to me to even try to work 2^99 out. I have trouble after 2^16, after 2^18 I usually need paper.
      For an order of magnitude, you usually add 3 digits in base 10 for every 2^10. 2^10~=1K, 2^20~=1M, 2^30~=1G, 2^40~=1T, etc.

  • @arehomann-danielsen3137
    @arehomann-danielsen3137 17 дней назад

    @Math queen What program do you use to show the problems.

  • @basildaoust2821
    @basildaoust2821 9 дней назад

    I watch you solve several of these puzzles and questions and it makes me feel really dumb. I'm sure that isn't the intent of the videos but I used to think I was smart but the longer I live the more I realize how dumb I am, which is a little saddening. Ah well, thanks for solving the the problem for me.

  • @delboy1727
    @delboy1727 17 дней назад +5

    Just by looking at it I knew the answer was 2^99 but I thought the question was ultimately asking you to work out what 2^99 actually was. I'm sitting here thinking there's no way I can work that out in my head.

    • @jeroennagtegaal2686
      @jeroennagtegaal2686 17 дней назад +2

      I agree. The title was a little bit misleading.

    • @HarryC-Smith
      @HarryC-Smith 17 дней назад +1

      Yes, I expected that too! But I estimated it to somewhere over 500 octillion!
      2¹⁰ = 1,024 so every 10th time just add 3 zeros:
      2¹⁰⁰ is around 1 nonillion; 2⁹⁹ is half that!
      Gives you a rough answer... :)

    • @delboy1727
      @delboy1727 17 дней назад

      @@HarryC-Smith Yep. Not understanding the question/assignment has let me down so many times.

    • @semiconnerd
      @semiconnerd 17 дней назад

      @@HarryC-SmithLittle bit more accuracy gives you this method:
      2^100=(2^10)^10=(1,024e3)^10≈1,24*e30
      2^99=(2^100)/2≈6,2e29

  • @MadSlantedPowers
    @MadSlantedPowers 16 дней назад

    I think in general x^(n+1) - x^n = (x-1)*x^n

  • @hangthuy458
    @hangthuy458 4 дня назад +1

    2^99(2-1)=2^99×1=2^99

  • @gedasgediminas3564
    @gedasgediminas3564 4 дня назад

    x^(n+1)-x^n=(x-1)*x^n.

  • @TekCroach
    @TekCroach 17 дней назад

    half of 2^100? for example, 2^7 = 128 and 2^8 = 256, so, 2^8 - 2^7 = 256 - 128 = 128 which is half of 256.

  • @Szejski
    @Szejski 16 дней назад

    But I still don't know what 2^99 is, at least in decimal notation. Because in binary notation it's 1 with 99 zeros

  • @LepadatuTudor-v9j
    @LepadatuTudor-v9j 17 дней назад

    Math queen i challange you :)) which number is bigger: 2^55 or 3^36.

  • @rimantasandriukaitis2730
    @rimantasandriukaitis2730 16 дней назад

    And 2⁹⁹ is how much ?

  • @Satolatoa
    @Satolatoa 9 дней назад

    Reminds me of "If you are running a race and you passed the second person then what's your position?".

  • @iGrayons
    @iGrayons 17 дней назад +1

    What if the sign was ADDITION? Please make a video for that. Thank you.

    • @davebathgate
      @davebathgate 17 дней назад

      3*(2^99)

    • @juergenilse3259
      @juergenilse3259 17 дней назад +1

      With a similar way as in the video, it is easy to show, that 2^100+2^99=3*2^99

  • @edfix
    @edfix 17 дней назад

    2^100 = 2 * 2^99 = 2^99 + 2^99
    Then subtract 2^99 and the answer is 2^99

  • @striker8380
    @striker8380 17 дней назад +1

    No need to factorise! 2x - x = x where x= 2^99

  • @larbibenmrad1968
    @larbibenmrad1968 5 дней назад

    autre méthode :
    2^99 + 2^99 = 2 X 2^99 = 2^100
    2^100 - 2^99 = 2^99 +2^99 - 2^99 = 2^99

  • @LubosMedovarsky
    @LubosMedovarsky День назад

    Every assembly language developer knows the answer out of their head: 10, but in binary 🙂

  • @b43xoit
    @b43xoit 15 дней назад

    2 ^ 100 = 2(2^99) = 2^99 + 2^99. Subtract 2^99 and only 2^99 remains.

  • @RogueNinja-z5f
    @RogueNinja-z5f 17 дней назад

    Mental math. 2^100 = 2×2^99 so you're subtracting half of 2^100, so you're left w the number after the minus sign.

  • @lreid1457
    @lreid1457 17 дней назад

    2^99?

  • @culturemyworld2362
    @culturemyworld2362 17 дней назад

    It was common sense (to me) but I had no idea how to do the math on paper (a problem I always had).

  • @Washington-Dreaming
    @Washington-Dreaming 17 дней назад

    I think it’s 2. A ^ x - A ^ (x - 1) should be A ^ (x - ((x - 1)) = A ^ ( x - x + 1) = A ^ 1 = A

    • @jeroennagtegaal2686
      @jeroennagtegaal2686 17 дней назад

      This doesn't make sense. When subtracting two powers you cannot simply subtract the exponents. Otherwise 2^3 - 2^2 should be 2^(3-2)=2^1 = 2, while it should be 4. Moreover in this case A = 2, x = 100. Which means you claim: 2^100 - 2^99 = 2^(100 - 99) = 2^1 = 2, and it just isn't.

  • @thummalurusrinivasareddy1078
    @thummalurusrinivasareddy1078 День назад

    2^99(2^1---1)= 2^99×1= 2^99

  • @HarryC-Smith
    @HarryC-Smith 17 дней назад +1

    I did it the 2nd way (I knew 2^99 was half 2^100), and I offer the following formula:
    xⁿ+¹ - xⁿ = xⁿ•(x-1)
    I believe this works for any positive integer, at least!

  • @RylanceStreet
    @RylanceStreet 13 дней назад

    You can easily simplify the expression as you have shown. But you haven't really "solved" it. Unless you know a way to evaluate 2^99 in 10 seconds!

  • @longjohnsilver7986
    @longjohnsilver7986 7 дней назад

    It took to you 3 minutes and 52 second. You got to shape it up

  • @juergenilse3259
    @juergenilse3259 17 дней назад

    For ever natural number n, 2(n+1)-2n=2^n*2--2^n+1=2^n*(2-1)=2^n. So the excercise in the video is simply the special case for n=99 ....

  • @alucardthespy5539
    @alucardthespy5539 17 дней назад

    2^100 - 2^99 = ???
    2^99 = x
    2x - x = x
    2^100 - 2^99 = 2^99

  • @wes9627
    @wes9627 15 дней назад

    Approximately 2^99... Disclaimer: They wouldn't let me within 1000 miles of Harvard Business School, but I did graduate with honors from the Janitorial Services Business School, which I think does qualify me to take on high level mathematics problems like this one with some degree confidence.

  • @paulnieuwkamp8067
    @paulnieuwkamp8067 17 дней назад +4

    I got 2^99 in two or three seconds, and spent the other 7 to wonder how we were going to calculate 2^99 and didn't come up with a solution... Unfortunately the video also stops at 2^99, not at 6.3e+29 (rounded)...

    • @AaronSwenson
      @AaronSwenson 17 дней назад

      2^99 is the solution.

    • @paulnieuwkamp8067
      @paulnieuwkamp8067 17 дней назад

      @@AaronSwenson Only if 1 + 2 is also a valid solution (to another equation, obviously). There is still an arithmetic operator in the "solution"...

    • @AaronSwenson
      @AaronSwenson 17 дней назад

      @paulnieuwkamp8067 guess what....it is.

    • @paulnieuwkamp8067
      @paulnieuwkamp8067 16 дней назад

      @@AaronSwenson I don't think any math teacher would accept "1 + 2"; they all want to see that 3 there.

    • @AaronSwenson
      @AaronSwenson 16 дней назад

      @paulnieuwkamp8067 yes, but none will count it wrong unless they asked for the solution to be simplified completely.

  • @fcsolis
    @fcsolis 16 дней назад

    I worked it out without watching the show. My answer was 2^(99). Let me know if I got it right.

  • @damiengreenwood7378
    @damiengreenwood7378 17 дней назад

    This was unusually easy.. took about 3 secs... each power of 2 is double the power below it. So 2^100 = 2(2^99)..
    So it becomes ...
    2^99 +2^99 - 2^99.. .

    • @toby9999
      @toby9999 17 дней назад

      No, it was hard. Easy for you doesn't mean easy for everyone. Not everyone has a PhD

    • @buug76
      @buug76 17 дней назад +2

      I haven't a PhD but mentally I did 2³ - 2² = 8 - 4 = 4 = 2² then answered after about 5 secs 2⁹⁹

  • @marcelbpunkt
    @marcelbpunkt 16 дней назад

    Took me ~20 seconds but I'm old so my brain needed a bit of starter fluid first :D

  • @paulobouhid6648
    @paulobouhid6648 17 дней назад +1

    You forgot to evaluate 2^99 in seconds....

  • @AvikDey-z6y
    @AvikDey-z6y 15 дней назад

    2^99.(2)-2^99
    =2^99(2-1)
    =2^99