Mess up the opponents pawn structure while maintaining your own, trade queens and move into the end game. Works every time. Thats why, early on, you might trade a piece, or two, leaving the opponent wondering, why you did that. 10 moves later, they realize, oh crap! 😅😂😅
No, Yanofsky did not blunder. Fischer had a stronger end game, taking advantage of his small but significant material advantage. Yanofsky put up a good fight. He should have fought for a draw earlier in the game. But hind-sight is always 20/20.
Nice! Finally i found the source of pro game reconstructions with no "what if this or that happened and this is what the engine suggests" or some bimbo trying to act like she has never played against someone. This is what chess sounds like, without any extra bs on the backround :)
Que gran duelo...😮 Maestros !!!!
Thank you so much
It was a game with sophisticated steps. It was very funny and exciting to follow it with the mind.
A very well played game, a true masterpiece!
Schach ist große Geduld!
Precious gift,thanks for
sharing..👍 CHESS MATE💙😑👍👏👏👏...
This is very good no irritated oc commentary just watching 2 masters play
Thank you very much 🙏
Bobby faz uma manobra torre e cavalo q ninguém prevê insuperável o maior enxadrista de todos os tempos 😂
His blunder was playin Bobby
Maravillosa partida!
Fischer nos finais era insuperável estava com 19 anos
deutsche Übersetzung!?...😐...
Me gusta tú agresivo juego la jugada delAlfil atacando el enrroque yo ya la conocía y es muy buena, saludos cordiales..
Menor mini escavadeira do. Mundo
Menor escavadeira
Bobby was such a master of the end game. He was so patient and careful with his rook and knight at the end and protecting those last two pawns.
Yes 👍
Mess up the opponents pawn structure while maintaining your own, trade queens and move into the end game. Works every time. Thats why, early on, you might trade a piece, or two, leaving the opponent wondering, why you did that. 10 moves later, they realize, oh crap! 😅😂😅
Rajan koranpeedika india
Did Yanofsky blunder by letting Fischer take his bishop at the end?
No, Yanofsky did not blunder. Fischer had a stronger end game, taking advantage of his small but significant material advantage. Yanofsky put up a good fight. He should have fought for a draw earlier in the game. But hind-sight is always 20/20.
Nice! Finally i found the source of pro game reconstructions with no "what if this or that happened and this is what the engine suggests" or some bimbo trying to act like she has never played against someone. This is what chess sounds like, without any extra bs on the backround :)
Thank you very much! Please push the bell 🔔 to stay connected with this channel. If you need any help, feel free to write us
I don't believe the rating under Bobby's name. Add a 100 and I would.
...at least👍😀...
Where your comments? Where did Yanofsky blunder?
ĺĺlĺ
I suppose 104. Rb2-b4 was the only error since he allowed Fischer to give check to his opponent's King and win few moves White's remaining Pawn.
Playing White with no real aggression already defending far too early.
Бессмысленных ходов много.
Fiser
Yanofsky resign!
Qg6 blunder