Because it's true. It's pretty obvious when you look at their past innovative designs and...whatever you call what they have now. It's kinda hard to ignore.
@@RallyLancer95 You're tired of seeing it, but it only happens with this frequency because it wasn't just that they made good stuff and then didn't...there's a fucking gulf between what they made, and what they make. The difference between 1992 and 2012 (for example) is actually shocking..like...the people who ran Mitsubishi into "we only sell cars to people with bad credit" territory need to be sent down for egregious wrongdoing. Probably best to just ignore comments because this shit is comin down the pike every time. :)
I get being tired of seeing the same comments over and over again...trust me. I also get that a lot of former Mitsubishi enthusiasts feel burnt by them, which I also agree with. They used to be basically the Japanese Citroen, now there's no good reason to buy them other than cheap pricing.
@@klasseact6663 In several regards. Mitsubishi used to be the forefront of technology such as turbo, AWD, 4 wheel steering, electronically adjustable suspension in both height and firmness, traction control... etc in what was essentially family cars. In top spec, models like the first gen Diamante, Galant and Montero were distinctly luxurious. Many of their engines incorporated their patented balance shafts that made them silky smooth and rev effortlessly. They also had solid build quality unlike the cheap, tinny, hollow feel of today's models. In the late 90s is when they began going cheap instead, following a low price strategy that continues to this day.
They still build good cars. 2009 Outlander was great with 0 issues over 80k miles, 2011 Outlander Sport was fantastic with 0 issues for 150k miles, 2016 Lancer was amazing with 0 issues over 67k miles, 2019 Outlander GT is doing well so far with just under 5k miles. They're very good where it actually counts, durability and reliability and all of their AWD systems were unstoppable in snow and ice. Their engines still have patented technology, like variable valve timing for both intake and exhaust valves on a SOHC engine, the first SOHC engine to do so (no one knows this it seems, Google 4J11 and 4J12). You can keep the bullcrap trinkets from the 90s, thanks.
Motorweek praises the Galant’s styling. I remember when car and driver called the styling on a white VR4 version they were testing as “styling by frigidaire.”
@@asdfghjqwertyu1858 Mitsu had to find a niche market here in the states making reliable cars that arent as nice as a Toyota but cheaper by thousands. Honda/Toyota ask too much now for cars.
Even the base SOHC was smooth as a sewing machine and revs so effortlessly thanks to those balance shafts. Once you live with one you will find many other engines will feel like a vibrating phone, especially the modern ones.
I think it was 1991, rented a base Galant for a week on summer vacation, they were fleet cars then, was expecting the worst because at the time I think it was rated at 102 HP, was expecting a real snoozer...walked away loving that car. It wasn't exactly speedy, but didn't matter, it was so refined and solid...just a nice car in every way. The fact that I remember it with that much detail so many years later says something.
@@thetreblerebel These will pull way past 6000. The stock bottom ends are pretty tough on these, too. I've set up a few balance shafts on these engines. I'm not a fan of Mitsubishi balance shaft setups like these, but they do rev smoothly. Nice Japanese-built cars.
I had a 2003 4cyl and 2001 V6 Galant, both with high miles. The 4cyl got totaled when someone crashed into it while it was parked; I replaced it with the V6. I donated that one in 2016 when my family expanded and I had to get a dad car. Somebody got a great car, thing still started and drove, and it was quieter than my new cars since all this direct injection nowadays sounds like mini Diesel engines at idle. I miss my Galants.
Really? Because the lil venerable new Mitsubishi Mirages have been selling really well. I uber in mine and it kicks in saving me $. Simple, reliable, cheap to own & maintain, cheap insurance, proven drive train, decent ammenities, I avg 40 mpg COMBINED! I got all this for under $10k.
I feel like the retro reviews gave more meaningful information and impressions than the current reviews do...honestly, I've pretty much stopped watching new Motorweek.
Keep in mind that older cars didn't have nearly as many features and options as newer cars, so they were able to do a much more thorough review in 6 minutes then than they can do now. Go watch a review channel of a modern car where they review just 1 car at a time you'll see the review is at least 15 minutes... And thats for a first drive review!
@@foxtrot685 I'm not talking about just listing features, to me listing features is not a "review". Old Motorweek actually has something to say about handling behavior, ride quality, braking performance and feel, etc. New Motorweek may or may not talk about some of these things in their reviews, but they don't hit those notes consistently anymore, and while Motorweek has never been hard-hitting journalism, old Motorweek at least had a little confidence to say something meaningful, but new Motorweek says basically nothing of value for fear of being controversial.
I ALWAYS root for the underdogs!!!!!!!! Mitsubishi is on life support now, but 30 years ago, they were BOOMING with cars like their Eclipse sport coupe & THIS wolf in sheep's clothing.
Life support? Hardly dude, theyre actually experiencing a nice comeback. I know my 2014 Mirage kicks ass at Ubering. Simple, reliable drivetrain that nets me 40 mpg combined! They still make reliable cars at a good price.
magnuscat I have a 2001 mirage and my mom has a 2014. Both have the same mileage because I bought mine off a lady who barely drove it. Comparing the build quality you can tell that Mitsubishi has really cut corners over the years.
My cousin bought a 2007 Ralliart edition brand new back in early 2008. It wasn't all much, just cosmetic enhancements. I felt the V6 was kind of weak. He then later sold it in 2010 for an Evolution IX MR. Still has it to this day, bone stock.
Mitsubishi got old!!! It became an old boring lady that just wants to stay home. I remember being in HS mide 90’s and drooling over any Eclipse. Cool cars back then and even today this car looks great, love the interior. Cars today are all the same style. Great retro!!
I love my Mitsubishi Mirage CVT. Cheap, zipping fuel, indestructable, with all options it is comfy too (soft suspension). 60.000 miles of carefree driving and counting. No oil use, no wear inside out. For that price, I don't think there is a better car if you are aware that you are on public roads and not on a race track, that is.
I would love to have a Galant GSX with an automatic, power steering, air conditioning, CD player, and ABS (anti-lock brakes)! It would probably be a cheaper car now then what it was when new!
Had a 1997 Galant GS with a manual transmission. Good car all around, clutch was kinda tricky compared to all other vehicles id driven. Release the clutch pedal little by little and it would slowly grab and then right at the end it would buck like it was in a panic. Every other manual transmission vehicle I drove would go into a crawl as expected. Had a friend drive it with me to confirm I wasn't going crazy and they were like yeah that is weird. Lol
I always liked this model Galant. A shame Mitsubishi is nearly dead now with a lineup of uninteresting models which are only average at best. They used to be some of the most advanced Japanese cars, pioneering technologies like balance shafts, GDI and 4WD with torque vectoring.
Mitsu couldn't play in this segment now if they wanted to. There was room for these Bubble Era technical tours de force on the US market because the premium Germans were still following their stagflation-era pricing model - $4500 more for an Audi 80!
On some of these reviews when they talk about the rear seat not folding down but the center part comes down "to fit skis" I wonder are there really that many people who are hauling around skis?
Back then, that feature was a big selling point because the a lot of cars were sold in the northeast and most people didn't want to buy a dedicated ski rack. I used my pass through all the time.
I thought the same thing. Even with AWD, it's amazing that a small four cylinder can would only be rated 20/23. 135 horsepower was pretty darn good power for a four banger in 1990 but I'm still surprised the mileage was so low.
The vr4 was a vastly different and more modern car, not that this one was old far from it, it just highlights how far ahead of its time the vr4 was. Suspension was multilink rear on the vr4 vs torsion beam on the regular Galant, Abs was four wheel independent, and the vr4 had 4 wheel steering as well as a more sophisticated torque vectoring system. The vr4s chassis was also heavily stiffened and more exclusive manufacturing techniques, like special spot welds, were used.
Galant was an underrated car, and it should have received more credit than it did. Get rid of the manual transmission and I’d take it. I don’t know why Motorweek kept testing manual transmissions over automatics, especially since most Americans drive automatic…
That EPA mileage is very inaccurate. I would average close to 30mpg on the highway in my Galant VR4. And that was with a bigger turbo and injectors. Hell, my DSMs would get over 30mpg highway.
1990 to 1992 N/A Galant GSX is Very I mean Very hard to Found now, DSM guy say there are more Galant VR4's on the Road Than Galant GSX's, I own a 91 Galant GSX, Perfect in the Snow but sucks at low end power and Gas mileage,
That braking distance is really impressive 60-0 in 106 feet. For comparison a 2019 Range Rover SVAutobiography takes 118 ft , 2019 Tesla model 3 123 feet, 2020 Nissan versa 124 ft. 2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray Convertible 90 ft. I guess cars are too heavy , i did pick random cars 60-0 distance
These are so rare knew couple people had a Galant that was in good shape, they seemed like fun cars back in the day a car just wanted to have some fun in, Mitsubishi now makes boring cars in the early 90s to mid 2000s they made some nice cars my favorite was Montero Sport that was a nice SUV and Eclipse, what happened Mitsubishi?
Comparing it to a Camry all track however he failed to mention that most Camry all tracks if they have it rusted away are still on the road today almost 30 years later while you were lucky If the golan Survived longer then the loan to buy it did. Mitsubishi's All head Val seal and head gasket issues. It was common for the mitzubishi golant, mitsubishi eclipse, montero, Mirage, And especially the extra awful Precs Which was just a re badged Hyundai excelTo start burning oil at around 60K miles
![[HD] Greatest Hollywood Car Chase of All Time - Bullitt (1968)](/img/1.gif)
Want to help keep our weekly Retro Reviews alive? DONATE NOW: mptevents.regfox.com/motorweek
Literally anytime an old Mitsubishi review gets put up
90% of comments: *Damn remember when Mitsubishi made good stuff?*
Because it's true. It's pretty obvious when you look at their past innovative designs and...whatever you call what they have now. It's kinda hard to ignore.
@@B3Quattro You think I don't know this? I love Mitsubishi. I'm tired of seeing the same comments every fucking time
Remember when Mitsubishi made good stuff?
Pepperidge Farm remembers.
@@RallyLancer95 You're tired of seeing it, but it only happens with this frequency because it wasn't just that they made good stuff and then didn't...there's a fucking gulf between what they made, and what they make. The difference between 1992 and 2012 (for example) is actually shocking..like...the people who ran Mitsubishi into "we only sell cars to people with bad credit" territory need to be sent down for egregious wrongdoing. Probably best to just ignore comments because this shit is comin down the pike every time. :)
I get being tired of seeing the same comments over and over again...trust me. I also get that a lot of former Mitsubishi enthusiasts feel burnt by them, which I also agree with. They used to be basically the Japanese Citroen, now there's no good reason to buy them other than cheap pricing.
I pretty much never watch new car review videos, but I absolutely DEVOUR these retro reviews.
They are good to prevent a car lover from idol worship, unless a person is lusting for these?
Nothing new on the market interests me. MW has sunk to almost all EV reviews.
When Mitsubishi built good cars....
Oh how they have fallen like a stone in the ocean. ) =
Good as far as what?
They were ok I had a mighty max pickup, they were the cheapest of the 3 Japanese cars, I had ECU issues & it rusted pretty easily
@@klasseact6663 In several regards. Mitsubishi used to be the forefront of technology such as turbo, AWD, 4 wheel steering, electronically adjustable suspension in both height and firmness, traction control... etc in what was essentially family cars. In top spec, models like the first gen Diamante, Galant and Montero were distinctly luxurious. Many of their engines incorporated their patented balance shafts that made them silky smooth and rev effortlessly. They also had solid build quality unlike the cheap, tinny, hollow feel of today's models. In the late 90s is when they began going cheap instead, following a low price strategy that continues to this day.
They still build good cars. 2009 Outlander was great with 0 issues over 80k miles, 2011 Outlander Sport was fantastic with 0 issues for 150k miles, 2016 Lancer was amazing with 0 issues over 67k miles, 2019 Outlander GT is doing well so far with just under 5k miles. They're very good where it actually counts, durability and reliability and all of their AWD systems were unstoppable in snow and ice. Their engines still have patented technology, like variable valve timing for both intake and exhaust valves on a SOHC engine, the first SOHC engine to do so (no one knows this it seems, Google 4J11 and 4J12). You can keep the bullcrap trinkets from the 90s, thanks.
Motorweek praises the Galant’s styling. I remember when car and driver called the styling on a white VR4 version they were testing as “styling by frigidaire.”
Well...then you could say that about any white car, no?
Back when Mitsubishi’s lineup was not full of rubbish.
The new Mirage is a fantastic value for the money. I know mine has served me well.
The new Mitsubishi Mirage is a fantastic commuter econobox. Love mine.
@@kylemas2005 I just find Mitsubishi's new lineup does not impress me as much as their older models did.
@@asdfghjqwertyu1858 Mitsu had to find a niche market here in the states making reliable cars that arent as nice as a Toyota but cheaper by thousands. Honda/Toyota ask too much now for cars.
One word -- Renault
Even the base SOHC was smooth as a sewing machine and revs so effortlessly thanks to those balance shafts. Once you live with one you will find many other engines will feel like a vibrating phone, especially the modern ones.
I think it was 1991, rented a base Galant for a week on summer vacation, they were fleet cars then, was expecting the worst because at the time I think it was rated at 102 HP, was expecting a real snoozer...walked away loving that car. It wasn't exactly speedy, but didn't matter, it was so refined and solid...just a nice car in every way. The fact that I remember it with that much detail so many years later says something.
I enjoy a I4 reving to 6000 rpms
@@thetreblerebel These will pull way past 6000. The stock bottom ends are pretty tough on these, too. I've set up a few balance shafts on these engines. I'm not a fan of Mitsubishi balance shaft setups like these, but they do rev smoothly. Nice Japanese-built cars.
Mitsubishi used to be so cool
I wish I could buy another Galant! My 2003 is still a great car
My 2001 went to almost 300k miles with only a radiator and timing chain/belt changed. Great car!
I had a 2003 4cyl and 2001 V6 Galant, both with high miles. The 4cyl got totaled when someone crashed into it while it was parked; I replaced it with the V6. I donated that one in 2016 when my family expanded and I had to get a dad car. Somebody got a great car, thing still started and drove, and it was quieter than my new cars since all this direct injection nowadays sounds like mini Diesel engines at idle. I miss my Galants.
Mine's a 2000 turbo diesel, and I love it, parts are not so easy find, and expensive, but I love it.
Sharkmouth😁
When Mitsubishi had a full lineup of vehicles including pickup trucks.
I miss my 91 galant vr-4. Running speed density tune with a 16g turbo. Nothin crazy but was such a good winter car
Man, those things are super rare now, no?
Gsx has a 4G63, AWD, and a 5 speed, just needs boost :)
Got in a race with a modified one in my 91 Mr 2 turbo a couple decades ago. Still remember that ass kicking. Thought I had it in reverse.
That's my setup but on gm maf. I'm number 1209/2000
This is back when Mitsu cared about making competitive cars.
Remember when mitsu used to make cars that everyone wanted to drive? Those were good times. Now they make vehicles that I wouldnt even take for free.
LRulesTheWorld except the Outlander.
Really? Because the lil venerable new Mitsubishi Mirages have been selling really well. I uber in mine and it kicks in saving me $. Simple, reliable, cheap to own & maintain, cheap insurance, proven drive train, decent ammenities, I avg 40 mpg COMBINED! I got all this for under $10k.
You’d definitely take one for free😪
I miss the Galant and the old Mitsubishi line up of the 90s and 00s
Where did they go wrong?
Best era of Mitsubishi Galant and others cars of Mistubishi 1980s and 1990s
I just love watching all these retro car reviews.
There you guys go and try to break the shifter again. 2:50
Those motorized seatbelts. Thank god those are gone
I'm around 6'5" tall. Every one I ever used felt like it was trying to strangle me.
One of the few things I DON'T miss about 80's-90's cars.
Yep...no need for airbags when the seatbelts will choke ya to epic unconsciousness!
I feel like the retro reviews gave more meaningful information and impressions than the current reviews do...honestly, I've pretty much stopped watching new Motorweek.
Keep in mind that older cars didn't have nearly as many features and options as newer cars, so they were able to do a much more thorough review in 6 minutes then than they can do now. Go watch a review channel of a modern car where they review just 1 car at a time you'll see the review is at least 15 minutes... And thats for a first drive review!
It's pretty much the same
@@foxtrot685 I'm not talking about just listing features, to me listing features is not a "review". Old Motorweek actually has something to say about handling behavior, ride quality, braking performance and feel, etc. New Motorweek may or may not talk about some of these things in their reviews, but they don't hit those notes consistently anymore, and while Motorweek has never been hard-hitting journalism, old Motorweek at least had a little confidence to say something meaningful, but new Motorweek says basically nothing of value for fear of being controversial.
I ALWAYS root for the underdogs!!!!!!!! Mitsubishi is on life support now, but 30 years ago, they were BOOMING with cars like their Eclipse sport coupe & THIS wolf in sheep's clothing.
Life support? Hardly dude, theyre actually experiencing a nice comeback. I know my 2014 Mirage kicks ass at Ubering. Simple, reliable drivetrain that nets me 40 mpg combined! They still make reliable cars at a good price.
magnuscat I have a 2001 mirage and my mom has a 2014. Both have the same mileage because I bought mine off a lady who barely drove it. Comparing the build quality you can tell that Mitsubishi has really cut corners over the years.
@@kylemas2005 the CVT transmissions are trash. The 5 speed manuals are much better
@@kylemas2005 just because Mitsubishi's sales are stable doesn't mean everyone is happy.
my 2012 lancer sportback has 384,000 km and counting only oil changes, breaks, tires and standard maintenance
My cousin bought a 2007 Ralliart edition brand new back in early 2008. It wasn't all much, just cosmetic enhancements. I felt the V6 was kind of weak. He then later sold it in 2010 for an Evolution IX MR. Still has it to this day, bone stock.
Those were nice looking car for the era... Clean, aggressive styling.
This was a terrific car for the era.
I am going to be on TV, I'll be sure to wear the following:
1) driving gloves
2) grass stained nike's
Mitsubishi got old!!! It became an old boring lady that just wants to stay home. I remember being in HS mide 90’s and drooling over any Eclipse. Cool cars back then and even today this car looks great, love the interior. Cars today are all the same style. Great retro!!
the Galant's on the road i see often is the 1997 to 2003 model years.
Me too, I still see some Gallants on the road also.
One of my favorite cars from the 90s , only bested by the VR-4 trim
I love my Mitsubishi Mirage CVT. Cheap, zipping fuel, indestructable, with all options it is comfy too (soft suspension). 60.000 miles of carefree driving and counting. No oil use, no wear inside out. For that price, I don't think there is a better car if you are aware that you are on public roads and not on a race track, that is.
2:18 John: BUT WE HAVE AN AVERSION TO PLUGS OR FAKE SWITCHES THAT MITSUBISHI USES ON THE DASH! LOL
If u had a mitsu in the hood you were the man straight up
Back when Mitsubishi made interesting cars. My friends parents had them and they were great to ride in.
underrated to the max
I still love that classic Mitsubishi engine bay. Aah the good old days.
Who's watching the retro videos because they miss the era of time?
**Hand is up**
This was sold in Canada as the Dodge 2000 GTX (and Eagle 2000 GTX) since we didn't have Mitsubishi up here at the time.
Daughter got a 2005 Galant 135k rides like a dream
I would love to have a Galant GSX with an automatic, power steering, air conditioning, CD player, and ABS (anti-lock brakes)! It would probably be a cheaper car now then what it was when new!
I had one of these and it was great car. Hatchback and front wheel drive version though. Heaps of space in the back. Nice solid car.
I remember back in the day thinking this car was so cool. I still do.
Love this retro
*Please do the 2000-2005 Buick Lesabre next!*
Oh Mitsubishi please come back to us
They could add a new Galant to their lineup and it might get some conquest sales from CUV owners ho really want a sedan but couldn't get one.
Sweet little ride
Had a 1997 Galant GS with a manual transmission. Good car all around, clutch was kinda tricky compared to all other vehicles id driven. Release the clutch pedal little by little and it would slowly grab and then right at the end it would buck like it was in a panic. Every other manual transmission vehicle I drove would go into a crawl as expected. Had a friend drive it with me to confirm I wasn't going crazy and they were like yeah that is weird. Lol
My Celica is like that. It's such a weird issue I've not seen many manuals with that problem but when they do it sucks
I had no clue the Galant was ever available with AWD! It's a shame Mitsu axed it... and the Lancer... and the Eclipse... and the Montero...
I always liked this model Galant. A shame Mitsubishi is nearly dead now with a lineup of uninteresting models which are only average at best. They used to be some of the most advanced Japanese cars, pioneering technologies like balance shafts, GDI and 4WD with torque vectoring.
Mitsu couldn't play in this segment now if they wanted to. There was room for these Bubble Era technical tours de force on the US market because the premium Germans were still following their stagflation-era pricing model - $4500 more for an Audi 80!
This goes back to Mitsubishi history when they also were known as the big screen company.
On some of these reviews when they talk about the rear seat not folding down but the center part comes down "to fit skis" I wonder are there really that many people who are hauling around skis?
Back then, that feature was a big selling point because the a lot of cars were sold in the northeast and most people didn't want to buy a dedicated ski rack. I used my pass through all the time.
This is a badass car. Mitsubishi turbo cars during this time are fuggin fast
Cool 😀
gas mileage is mediocre for a 4 cylinder sedan, that is even less than many V6 midsize cars of its era.
Welcome to owning a 4g63 lol
Had almost the same hp as a V6 too thi🤷🏽♂️
I thought the same thing. Even with AWD, it's amazing that a small four cylinder can would only be rated 20/23. 135 horsepower was pretty darn good power for a four banger in 1990 but I'm still surprised the mileage was so low.
@@benkromminga5739 I know the 1990 GM W-Cars along with the J-cars had only 135bhp from its 3.1 Liter V6.
I didn't know this car existed, seems like a pretty cool car! I would actually take this over a VR-4, I prefer reliability over turbos.
I wonder how many AWD GSXs like this are left
only in 2020 are AWD non-Subaru sedans making a comeback (Camry and Altima)
Shifter is much less notchy if you shift it when it's running and use the clutch.
Had one of these I think the dash lights changed colors.
Had an 01 gtz gallant...I Miss it
No mention of the 1990 Subaru Legacy Sport Sedan with it's EJ22T? Seems like that's what the Galant was aiming at.
MY DREAM
Hmmm a detuned galant VR-4
Just NA
The vr4 was a vastly different and more modern car, not that this one was old far from it, it just highlights how far ahead of its time the vr4 was.
Suspension was multilink rear on the vr4 vs torsion beam on the regular Galant, Abs was four wheel independent, and the vr4 had 4 wheel steering as well as a more sophisticated torque vectoring system. The vr4s chassis was also heavily stiffened and more exclusive manufacturing techniques, like special spot welds, were used.
Had one.
those were the days when third brake lights were still a bit of a novelty.
Base price: $16,369 in 1990 = $32,680 in 2019 dollars.
As tested: $20,030 in 1990 = $39,990 in 2019 dollars.
Seems a bit pricey.
yes pricey, but you got for that time an very advanced AWD system. The Audi 80 was much higher in price, and not necessarily a much better car
Galant was an underrated car, and it should have received more credit than it did. Get rid of the manual transmission and I’d take it. I don’t know why Motorweek kept testing manual transmissions over automatics, especially since most Americans drive automatic…
Damm those air forces beat 💀💀💀
That EPA mileage is very inaccurate. I would average close to 30mpg on the highway in my Galant VR4. And that was with a bigger turbo and injectors. Hell, my DSMs would get over 30mpg highway.
1990 to 1992 N/A Galant GSX is Very I mean Very hard to Found now, DSM guy say there are more Galant VR4's on the Road Than Galant GSX's, I own a 91 Galant GSX, Perfect in the Snow but sucks at low end power and Gas mileage,
Back when Mitsubishi made good cars.
A gallant effort from Mitsubishi. 😁
Old motorweek is so much more informative and descriptive
That braking distance is really impressive 60-0 in 106 feet. For comparison a 2019 Range Rover SVAutobiography takes 118 ft , 2019 Tesla model 3 123 feet, 2020 Nissan versa 124 ft. 2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray Convertible 90 ft. I guess cars are too heavy , i did pick random cars 60-0 distance
The evo before the evo!
These are so rare knew couple people had a Galant that was in good shape, they seemed like fun cars back in the day a car just wanted to have some fun in, Mitsubishi now makes boring cars in the early 90s to mid 2000s they made some nice cars my favorite was Montero Sport that was a nice SUV and Eclipse, what happened Mitsubishi?
It's no VR-4
who is the person testing inside the car?
My parents had this car in the Uk in the early 90s
my uncle had this car, it was good
his had dashboard controls for electronic ride height and dampening control
"...this up and coming Japanese car maker." Ouch, that didn't age well, JD.
Ahhh the gloved gearbox killer is back
we used to get the jdm vr4 here in new zealand used to be popular but hardly any survived the boy racers lol i still prefer rear drive cars
What?! There was a second generation All-Trac Camry?
Mitsubishi has been around since 1871 the three diamonds are the coat of arms of the original founder a samurai warrior.
...and, they made the Zeroes that flew over Pearl Harbor. No hate, just setting a little history.
It's so weird to hear GSX and not be talking about an Eclipse
Mitsubishi made the best cars in the past 😞
Need to get me some driving gloves like that
Why is the mpg only 3 mpgs higher on the freeway, odd🤔
heavy car, 4wd gears add drag to efficiency of air travel, extra driven wheels, under-powered over-stressed engine. many reasons.
Норм
Where is that car today ?
Install a turbo, boom, budget Evo
I think John was born with an oil pressure gauge and volt meter
I like the new OutLander Sport but the cvt transmission is/was a no go for me so I bought a 2016 VW GSW instead.
Lenwood Cruze even more unreliable
@@iketanikoichiro3519 has been perfect so far.
That’s only 3 years. Wait 5 years.
@@iketanikoichiro3519?
How are we so lucky?!?
I always drove mine with an egg under the petal. Idk what it is but Mitsubishi seemed to have power but will burn oil later on
Rarer then a vr4 galant
106ft?! Wow.
Comparing it to a Camry all track however he failed to mention that most Camry all tracks if they have it rusted away are still on the road today almost 30 years later while you were lucky If the golan Survived longer then the loan to buy it did. Mitsubishi's All head Val seal and head gasket issues. It was common for the mitzubishi golant, mitsubishi eclipse, montero, Mirage, And especially the extra awful Precs Which was just a re badged Hyundai excelTo start burning oil at around 60K miles
My lovely Mitsubishi, what went wrong?
Renault, that's what. But they really lost their way even before then.
The gsx was a non turbo the vr4 was the turbo charged 😮
It almost looks like a cavalier from the back.
You're not wrong. Overall it looks like a Mazda 626 from back in the day
I wonder exactly when he stopped saying Gahlaahn?