How Sun's Lost Twin Is Still Affecting The Solar System

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 фев 2025
  • In the 1980s, astronomers proposed that the Sun actually had an evil trouble-making twin called Nemesis that swings past the solar system every 26-27 million years. Its gravitational turbulence sends a cloud of comets hurtling our way. And it's possible that the twin was the culprit that kicked an asteroid into Earth's orbit, which eventually collided with our planet, triggering the fifth mass extinction event that wiped out the dinosaurs.
    But the question is that if Nemesis is out there, where do we search for it?
    REFERENCES:
    [Paper] Embedded binaries and their dense cores, Sadavoy and Stahler, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society - bit.ly/3mDXCTA
    [Article] Our Sun May Have Been Born With a Trouble-Making Twin Called 'Nemesis,' Mike Mcrae - ScienceAlert - bit.ly/3ZYOasx
    [Press Release] New Evidence That All Stars are Born in Pairs, Robert Sanders, Berkley News - bit.ly/3ynbbtk
    [Article] Nemesis Star Theory: The Sun's 'Death Star' Companion, Space.com - bit.ly/3J1JxH3
    Created by: Rishabh Nakra and Simran Buttar
    Narrated by: Jeffrey Smith

Комментарии • 569

  • @ZacTexC
    @ZacTexC Год назад +296

    If it wasn’t for the Sun’s evil twin we wouldn’t be here.

    • @rolflandale2565
      @rolflandale2565 Год назад +8

      Cannot say the same blessing over lessons of the prior civilization among the solar system, but yes. It's true.

    • @rezadaneshi
      @rezadaneshi Год назад +1

      What if, dinosaurs are truly the ones that thanked god for providing them food and an ark to survive the flood and the human in dinosaur’s digestive systems lived on later in a computer simulation ran by civilized dinosaurs feeling superstitiously guilty about their history. What if, BTW, they're mostly vegetarians now thanks as well to sun god's evil twin's guilting them to be more human. It's a particle anti particle mentality taken too far if you ask me including sun's twin being a primordial Black hole in our rush to be so special to have something that ancient gravitationally entangled with our solar system about 4 years ago. What if,

    • @antlionworkerfan2007
      @antlionworkerfan2007 Год назад +5

      ahh yes the big bugs lizards fish birds that aren’t birds and smaller than average rats

    • @Oldgreycowboy
      @Oldgreycowboy Год назад +17

      Maybe that explains my ex. She was an evil twin.

    • @AngryLad_80
      @AngryLad_80 Год назад +5

      ​@@Oldgreycowboy 💀

  • @michaelgomez3044
    @michaelgomez3044 Год назад +91

    When I first heard about Nemesis back in the 1990s I was breaking up with a girlfriend. She kept coming around every couple of weeks to get random things she "left" at my house and to stir up shit. I named her Nemisis.

    • @rak-aeru
      @rak-aeru Год назад +11

      could’ve declared that as “trespassing.”

    • @1080GBA
      @1080GBA Год назад +1

      😂💀💀

    • @Hey_MikeZeroEcho22P
      @Hey_MikeZeroEcho22P Год назад +7

      "...THE, Destroyer of Worlds!!" ..... well at least Your world......

    • @jonthomson9262
      @jonthomson9262 Год назад +1

      @@Hey_MikeZeroEcho22P Galactus.

    • @ColKorn1965
      @ColKorn1965 Год назад +8

      I called mine "Bipolar Betty".

  • @GururajBN
    @GururajBN Год назад +216

    Isn't this rather speculative? If Nemisis were indeed 500 AU away initially, how could it have moved by 600 LY? What could have propelled it away from its twin, our Sun? Isn't it more likely that the twin or the smaller sibling would have merged into Sun?

    • @JH-ws6lr
      @JH-ws6lr Год назад +6

      Perhaps same magnetic polarities?

    • @factswithdevasish
      @factswithdevasish Год назад +9

      Don't forget the fact that the Sun was formed 4.5 bya

    • @AudieHolland
      @AudieHolland Год назад +18

      I'm rather sceptical too.
      Never heard of this 'Sun's twin' ever before.
      It's not the closest star, Proxima Centauri and none of the nearby stars are moving closer.
      Because all stars are moving away from each other, that's the mainly held theory or isn't it?

    • @tunnsie
      @tunnsie Год назад +22

      I agree with you. This video is speculative comic book science.

    • @factswithdevasish
      @factswithdevasish Год назад +11

      @@AudieHolland that's because every star orbits the milky way and our stellar neighborhood is only temporary
      i mean if we somehow could magically orbit the galaxy once, our stellar neighborhood will be waay different from what it is rn

  • @MichaelClark-uw7ex
    @MichaelClark-uw7ex Год назад +61

    Since most exosystems have planets several times Jupiter's size and our sun is a yellow dwarf, the primorial cloud was probably pretty light, so the most logical type of twin for our sun would likely be a brown dwarf.

    • @KingLimbo05
      @KingLimbo05 Год назад +14

      If that is the case, then that might explain why it is so hard to find it. Brown dwarfs are too small and far too dim to detect by ordinary telescopes and detectors.

    • @kalinystazvoruna8702
      @kalinystazvoruna8702 Год назад +8

      @@KingLimbo05 Also, it might explain the weird orbits of some objects in the Kuiper Belt.
      "In January 2015, California Institute of Technology astronomers Konstantin Batygin and Mike Brown announced - based on mathematical calculations and simulations - that there could be a giant planet lurking far beyond Neptune. Several teams are now on the search for this theoretical "Planet Nine," and research suggests it could be located within the decade.
      This large object, if it exists, could help explain the movements of some objects in the Kuiper Belt, an icy collection of objects beyond Neptune's orbit. Brown has already discovered several large objects in that area that in some cases rivaled or exceeded the size of Pluto. (His discoveries were one of the catalysts for changing Pluto's status from planet to dwarf planet in 2006.) [As an aside, our moon is larger than Pluto.]
      But scientists are pursuing another theory, too: that "Planet Nine" could in fact be a grapefruit-sized black hole, warping space similarly to the way a gigantic planet would, and yet another team suggests that the weird movements of the far-flung Kuiper Belt occupants could be the collective influence of several small objects, not an undiscovered planet or black hole at all." (From: www.space.com/35695-weirdest-solar-system-facts.html)

    • @vapaperboi
      @vapaperboi 6 месяцев назад

      Nope sun ain't even yellow its white

    • @thefoolsfavorite
      @thefoolsfavorite 6 месяцев назад

      ​@@vapaperboimore accurately, isn't the sun like really light yellow? Cuz that's what G type stars are like (iirc)

    • @josephjohnson6849
      @josephjohnson6849 2 месяца назад

      That might explain planet X/9. Instead of a planet it's a brown dwarf.

  • @cinemaipswich4636
    @cinemaipswich4636 Год назад +76

    If we map the stars that are 26 -27 million light years away from us, we would see that Nemesis would have to pass through several thousands of other solar systems, before any "returning" star came our way. There would be obvious trails of destruction littered along the way. There is nothing in the fossil record about some clockwork events as described.

    • @bosatsu76
      @bosatsu76 Год назад +8

      It's a 27 million year ORBIT that brings it back around... Not 27 million light years...

    • @MichaelClark-uw7ex
      @MichaelClark-uw7ex Год назад +6

      Um 27 million LY would put it 100 times as far away as the Magellanic clouds.
      BTW the Milky Way is less than 200,000 LY wide

    • @ershenlin1774
      @ershenlin1774 Год назад +4

      @@bosatsu76 It seems to me everyone got it wrong. 😂

    • @MrSinister718
      @MrSinister718 Год назад +3

      @@bosatsu76 Something that far away would be stupid to call it a binary star.

    • @mattpotter8725
      @mattpotter8725 Год назад

      @@bosatsu76 Whilst I agree with you if a star was orbiting our sun with an orbital period of 27 million years, and on a highly elliptical orbit then it would get out further than many of our nearest stars, I'm not sure how many but a lot. Whilst there is always the possibility of this scenario being true, or even a stray star or planet that has been ejected from it's original galaxy or solar system this whole video smacks to me or putting a theory out there was fact, that just can't be proven one way or another, which to me isn't very scientific, and is really just click bait. Sure it could be true but I think there are better, simpler explanations.

  • @kenneymadsen5710
    @kenneymadsen5710 Год назад +9

    Nice fiction story, but it makes no sense.
    This HD 186302 star, is supposedly 184 light years away, but formed just 500 AU away?. I mean if basically any star was 184 LY's away, it would have no effect on our solar system at all. And this small star, should then be able to disrupt the Keiper belt every 27 million years? That would require HD 186302 to be in an orbit, than comes into quite close contact with our solar system, maybe a few light years, which is bollocks. And on top of that, if it formed 500 AU away and is still gravitationally bound in some sense, to come within a few LY's, how come its now 184 light years away?
    I mean come on now.

    • @jackyoung1208
      @jackyoung1208 Год назад +1

      He probably could've included a couple more suggestions from the main article he's quoting. (second link)
      It posits that the sun may have absorbed most of the gases from its stellar twin, and it's now a fairly dark dwarf star that we can't really detect that easily since it's not giving off much energy. If the sun did this, the other star would have gone into a much wider orbit over time, and could fit the description of the dwarf star going through the outer regions of the system and kicking some asteroids around. It could easily be in a long, highly eccentric orbit and dim enough to not stand out from the background radiation/objects. Considering Halley's comet, with a maximum distance of 35 AU and a minimum distance of 0.5 AU, a stellar-sized object that got flung into the outer reaches of the solar system could easily have an orbit in the millions of years. If it's in a similar orbital configuration, it may just be grazing the outskirts of the system when it makes its nearest passes.

    • @kenneymadsen5710
      @kenneymadsen5710 Год назад

      @@jackyoung1208
      That would be a more plausible theory, but in that case, we ain't taking about a star. Then it's the Nibiru-theory? Here he speaks of a star, slightly larger than our sun. And I looked up some data mentioning that
      HD 186302 was roughly 184 LY's away.
      I'm not sure if Nibiru and the M. Brown and K. Batygin theory of "their" Planet Nine, could somehow be one and the same. I mean obviously not, if Planet Nine is in the orbit that they are predicting. But maybe an object much further out, could recreate the same signs?

    • @WakisheaStormBringer336
      @WakisheaStormBringer336 7 месяцев назад +1

      But if every single atom’s ACTIONS had equal and opposite reactions for the duration of its life the binary star system would collapse the other star into a black hole. quantum entanglement would work with the stars through the eyes of all of the life within the solar systems of all of the stars that are born this way. Because double slit has proven that any type of observation is also basically how light travels and even crystals or diamonds are alive so all the planets are technically alive and the black holes are some type of reflective communications across space and time and distance within these systems.

    • @AngelSaintCloud
      @AngelSaintCloud 2 месяца назад +1

      Unfortunately you're wrong. You gotta break outside of your model. Unfortunately for me this is like explaining to early scientist's that we aren't the center of the universe even though in comparison at the time you are a very intelligent person give it a few decades when your model is disproven you are far from even remotely right. Not even in the realm of "2 sticks and shadows" proving the correct size of the earth right.

  • @waltermitchell3525
    @waltermitchell3525 Год назад +12

    The content + the music choice is a vibe 🚀

  • @waynesmallwood6027
    @waynesmallwood6027 Год назад +15

    If that red dwarf is only 1.5LY distant, then it's currently in our sun's gravity well.

  • @ashwanigupta7859
    @ashwanigupta7859 Год назад +11

    Should've called it 'Nus'

  • @cleander97
    @cleander97 Год назад +2

    We think of dinosaurs as poor creatures the went extinct. But, they roamed the earth for almost 100 million years. Humans haven’t been around for even 0.5 million years. How long more you think we can stick around as a species?

    • @Snow4LifeNEver
      @Snow4LifeNEver 4 месяца назад

      I'm not sure that's a fair comparison as dinosaurs weren't a single species. Mammals have been pretty good at surviving so far and have existed for about as long as dinosaurs.

  • @rezadaneshi
    @rezadaneshi Год назад +85

    Yes, but does sun’s evil twin solves the problem of why astroids always aim to land in craters

    • @TheDecafec4
      @TheDecafec4 Год назад +4

      Amen...

    • @student69741
      @student69741 Год назад +10

      That's due to huge momentum of asteroids which melt the surface around them and causes it to flow in the outward direction making a crater

    • @random_the_man
      @random_the_man Год назад +4

      Hm I never thought about that, why has no one wondered why

    • @achaille9110
      @achaille9110 Год назад +10

      ​@@student69741 - Wow! If it was left up to some people, science would be completely dead.

    • @seanhewitt603
      @seanhewitt603 Год назад +5

      Lmfao!, I.c.u....

  • @edwardgomez5616
    @edwardgomez5616 Год назад +6

    There are old stories of the purple sun being the original sun. Old civilizations speak of Saturn being the original sun, then being replaced by the current sun after it died and faded.

  • @mikeyd946
    @mikeyd946 Год назад +3

    Most star systems are Binary. Absolutely fascinating ☀️ Jupiter could be the Star that didn’t ignite. The Universe is full of mystery! Where would our Sun’s twin be? Astrophysics always is intriguing!

  • @cecillawla7036
    @cecillawla7036 Год назад +8

    Our Sun and Nemesis or other trouble twin is a really interesting proposition and deserves astrometic data research new knowledge for me after 62 plus yrs.

  • @doychinkutsarov9866
    @doychinkutsarov9866 Год назад +2

    The only thing which can fall under category Sun sibling would be Jupiter, which failed to gather enough mass to be as important as our Sun. The relation between stars in binary systems is clear but mysterious evil Sun twin sounds better for youtube hits. Absurd video.

  • @gjva1
    @gjva1 Год назад +14

    Sirius can be the Suns twin. Before 500 AD all ancient civilisations named Sirius the red star. Now it is blue. According to the Doppler effect, this means when it was red, it moved away from us. Now when it is blue, it comes back to his twin the Sun. Just heard this thought and find it very interesting.

    • @bkd4303
      @bkd4303 Год назад

      You can see serious a&b in the night sky, they've been calling at Mercury and Jupiter

    • @adriennegormley9358
      @adriennegormley9358 Год назад

      Actually, Sirius is a current double star. One of the is a white dwarf, which is what a red star becomes when it goes Nova. Most of the sources I've seen figure that the red one of the pair went Nova and collapsed into the white dwarf.

    • @Austin_99162
      @Austin_99162 Год назад

      Well, like all evil twins, the intention is spurred by jealousy so coming back is not to reconcile, but destroy- ultimately to no avail. Evil twins may cause havoc for a season, but good trumps bad and ultimately always wins..

    • @Greenr0
      @Greenr0 5 месяцев назад

      This is like what Billy Carson talking about the procession of the equinox is speeding up?

  • @jayzee9164
    @jayzee9164 Год назад +4

    You are not alone, I am here with you

  • @javiermac381
    @javiermac381 Год назад +2

    You are all wrong! It ain't a twin, it's was always a triple sun!

  • @juanmelendezrivera6085
    @juanmelendezrivera6085 Год назад +5

    Trace Sun's magnetic field on both sides and you will find out where is Nemesis. Thanks.

  • @rolflandale2565
    @rolflandale2565 Год назад +24

    This spaceship you know as the solar system, with a engine called the Sun, endured more episodes than any bibical, sci-fi show. drifting into natural vessels. Earth has been through inconceivable infinite reincarnation form, size, celestial parts and civilizations ago.

  • @theboysmusic326
    @theboysmusic326 Год назад +1

    0:57 I think that the sun's heat triggered the movement of the chiclub meteorite. like stone when it melts. but then on a bigger scale

  • @blahlbah8602
    @blahlbah8602 Год назад +10

    I just feel like Jupiter was going to become the Sun's twin as it was especially closer to the Sun back in it's infancy phase, but just didn't. And over the years was gradually pushed away and moved to it's current location.

    • @Kelnx
      @Kelnx Год назад +5

      Jupiter's mass isn't anywhere close to that of even the smallest stars. And compared to other gas giants we have found since we began identifying exoplanets, it's not a particularly large gas giant planet either. The idea that Jupiter is a "failed star" was based on very outdated knowledge. From what we've learned to this point, it takes a LOT more mass to approach that point. It is also currently understood that gas giants have rocky cores, starting out as ice planets that accrete large amounts of gas from the protoplanetary disc of a forming star. Basically, an icy/rocky world that has a very big atmosphere.

    • @snotsbuttwax
      @snotsbuttwax Год назад

      ​@@Kelnxso a planet that formed like Jupiter could never become a star?

    • @Kelnx
      @Kelnx Год назад

      @@snotsbuttwax Correct. Jupiter's mass is close to 2 x 10^27 kg, or about 1/1000th the mass of the Sun. Brown Dwarfs, which are the smallest types of stars and are effectively "failed stars" as they aren't massive enough to undergo sustained normal hydrogen fusion, are more than 10 times the mass of Jupiter at the low end. The smallest "real" stars are the red dwarfs, and they weigh in at around 80-100 times the mass of Jupiter at the low end.
      Jupiter, like other gas giants, was born from the "leftovers" of star formation that created the Sun. The vast majority of gas in the region where the Sun formed was used in this process likely along with the formation of at least one "twin" star as the above video suggests. What is leftover was a mix of some gas (in astronomy terms Hydrogen and Helium) and metals (anything heavier than Hydrogen and Helium). It is believed (though not yet confirmed) that gas giants such as Jupiter which form after most of the gas has collapsed into stars instead begin as accreted rocky planetoids. The first to form which have the most material around them can accrete faster than others and thus gain more mass, first a rocky world (and potentially an icy world) and then accreting leftover gas to become gas giants. This is how it is believed Jupiter formed.
      For Jupiter to become a star, a LOT of gas would have to be accreted by it. There simply isn't some 80 times its mass of gas available in local space to turn Jupiter into even a small red dwarf star. Even concepts posed in science fiction to turn Jupiter into a star are incredibly doubtful since there isn't that much material around to make it happen. Generally speaking, when there is that much gas around, it collapses into a star eventually on its own.

    • @FianFainFiatFaitArkangelCalel
      @FianFainFiatFaitArkangelCalel Год назад +1

      Some suggested Saturn formado before Júpiter and the Sun.

    • @Aleiza_49
      @Aleiza_49 Год назад +2

      ​​@@snotsbuttwax No, not at all. Jupiter isn't a failed star...just a medium-ish sized gas giant. It's not even close to the mass of a brown dwarf which are the least massive objects considered "star-like". There isn't enough mass in the rest of the solar system to make another star, the Sun is like 98~99% of the mass of the solar system.

  • @kunalroy9735
    @kunalroy9735 2 месяца назад +1

    Simply hypothesis not proven .

  • @firebird6522
    @firebird6522 Год назад +1

    Interesting topic and well done video. Subscribed!

  • @jcasa12
    @jcasa12 Год назад +4

    Is it possible that sun's twin is also orbiting in the milkyway galaxy and only crosses paths with the sun every 230 million years, which is approximately the time it takes the sun to orbit the milky way galaxy?

  • @davidmacgregor5193
    @davidmacgregor5193 Год назад +1

    Isn't Nemesis supposed to be a brown dwarf star?

  • @aqifliku2931
    @aqifliku2931 Год назад +4

    Bro this is amazing ...

  • @justadog8248
    @justadog8248 Год назад +2

    It's Jupiter.

  • @johnnydepth2132
    @johnnydepth2132 Год назад +5

    it should be noted..... our nearest sun system that is only 4 1/2 light years near to us and contains a G-class yellow-white star..... this is the same type of star just like our own.... we are related to the Centauri constellation.... is is estimated that the G-class yellow-white type stars make up about only 15% of all our stars in our own Galaxy.... also the G-class star is a Heavy metals producer .... this is where Gold comes from....

    • @seanhewitt603
      @seanhewitt603 Год назад +1

      Nope, gold comes from magnetar mergers

    • @yuridc1780
      @yuridc1780 Год назад

      Gold is simply a heavier element, it can be made to anything that can, not limited to one source

  • @TheRealRedAce
    @TheRealRedAce Год назад +7

    I think I'd have noticed a second sun.

  • @kathrynakers2767
    @kathrynakers2767 Год назад +3

    My theory is Jupiter is the bianery Star.Nemuses is what is left in the Astroiod belt.

  • @Nathan-ry3yu
    @Nathan-ry3yu Год назад +1

    How can they not see another star orbiting out far of our solar system especially after sending two probes that's already reached the ort cloud on the edge of our solar system. It can see other solar systems but not another star outside our own solar system I find very interesting strange.

  • @n-da-bunka2650
    @n-da-bunka2650 Год назад +1

    It's FAR more likely that Jupiter was destined to be our Sun's "twin". It just never fully developed

  • @kickinghorse2405
    @kickinghorse2405 Год назад +6

    Just think . . .
    We didn't even need a "Nemesis" to kick off the 6th mass extinction event.
    Be sure to R.S.V.P.
    Spaces are going fast!

    • @MichaelClark-uw7ex
      @MichaelClark-uw7ex Год назад

      6th?
      I think you're a few behind the curve.
      There have been more than 6

    • @kickinghorse2405
      @kickinghorse2405 Год назад

      @@MichaelClark-uw7ex 5, 6, 9 . . . Weeeee!

  • @Shadowkey392
    @Shadowkey392 Год назад +2

    Ummm…everything about this is either wrong or unlikely at best. If the sun had formed as part of a binary system, then there’s no way we would be here now. The only way that works is if you assume that the two stars became separated while they were still in the nascent stages of their formation. Any later and the planets would have started to form, and what ever event got rid of the twin would almost definitely have destroyed or pulled away the planets.
    The most likely answer to “did the sun form as part of a binary system” is no, it did not.

  • @Leopez02
    @Leopez02 Год назад +5

    IT would Be very interesting If sun were Have twin Star. I would like to see two suns like star wars. ☀️

    • @stevegardner3870
      @stevegardner3870 Год назад +1

      Our second sun is in the middle of the earth thank me later

    • @JH-ws6lr
      @JH-ws6lr Год назад

      I bet you wouldn't like twice the heat

  • @Sontus718
    @Sontus718 Год назад +10

    This is ridiculous - any star that came close enough to our sun during the last 100 m-years would not have been able to travel far enough away from us not to be easily detected as such a star.

    • @Stragus_Macleod
      @Stragus_Macleod Год назад +2

      It's sometimes more difficult to detect objects that are closer because the closer something is, the wider the variance of the angle in its movement. Far away object will move just the same, but because they are so far away, they appearr to be moving less, therefore making an object easier to track

  • @kellyjeaularson5786
    @kellyjeaularson5786 Год назад

    I think this study is more complicated than it needs to be. The Suns birth was near, not someplace across the galaxy.

  • @newt2049
    @newt2049 4 месяца назад +1

    Science just gets more and more Biblical.

  • @ndnforeverrage3213
    @ndnforeverrage3213 Год назад +6

    What if "Nemesis" is the Nine Planet or Planet "X"???

    • @syther836
      @syther836 Год назад +2

      Nemesis is not a planet. It's a star

    • @seanhewitt603
      @seanhewitt603 Год назад +2

      The ninth planet would be planet IX, not planet X, Roman numerals being what they are...

    • @achaille9110
      @achaille9110 Год назад

      What if small things were bigger?

  • @kirans1
    @kirans1 22 дня назад

    In Hinduism Sun's twin is called Mithra, it is carved in many temples along with Sun..

  • @windsolarartistic
    @windsolarartistic Месяц назад

    Nemesis: STARS
    bowser jr.: its a planet
    Shujinko: What is a Sun?

  • @alexwoolridge94aw
    @alexwoolridge94aw Год назад +7

    Scientists say proxima centauri is our closest stellar neighbor. If we had a stellar sibling, we'd be able to see it.

    • @MichaelClark-uw7ex
      @MichaelClark-uw7ex Год назад +1

      Do you realize how long it took scientists to discover Wolf 359 and Luman 16?
      Brown, sub-brown even red dwarfs are hard to find.

    • @christopherhug
      @christopherhug Год назад +1

      Only for now. All of the stars are constantly moving as the orbit the galaxy.

  • @AHHH-g1p
    @AHHH-g1p 5 месяцев назад +1

    The Plane Crash that never investigated and reported Dogma....

  • @paulburket
    @paulburket 2 месяца назад

    In early 80’s The pioneer probes discovered the dead star 50 billion miles away from the sun. Also found 10th planet (47 billion miles away).

  • @Nobody-mc4hr
    @Nobody-mc4hr Год назад +2

    Sun twin is actually Jupiter .

  • @borisbeloudus2691
    @borisbeloudus2691 Год назад +2

    There are several candidates for Nemesis. Proxima Centauri, Luhman 16, or a primordial black hole.

  • @Morristown337
    @Morristown337 18 дней назад

    As our sun moves a light year every 17,000 years; every 5-10 lightyears it seems likely to pass very near to other star systems. So its more likely that our solar system has had far more encounters with other star systems then they understand today.

  • @benjaminthame4174
    @benjaminthame4174 Год назад +1

    Wasn't Jupiter meant to be a star?

  • @williampilling2168
    @williampilling2168 Год назад +1

    The theory of Nemesis has been around for a while, but as the ability to detect objects has gone up, the likelihood of Nemesis has decreased significantly, since it still has not been detected, despite efforts made to locate it, it it exists.
    The suns companion would have been Jupiter, if it had enough mass.

    • @JackBlack-y9l
      @JackBlack-y9l Год назад

      But what if our twin star is a brown darf, then the only way to see it is through Infrared, and we would have to locate it with James web.

    • @williampilling2168
      @williampilling2168 Год назад +1

      @@JackBlack-y9l They would still be able to detect it through gravity and it's influence on the other planets. That's how Neptune was discovered in 1846.

    • @JackBlack-y9l
      @JackBlack-y9l Год назад +1

      @@williampilling2168 there is a gravitational pull that's unaccounted for in our solar system, beyond Neptune. They added a mass close or equal to our sun and the math fit, they say our systems
      Is binary and most likely merged but I find that hard to believe when the oldest story told, is of an ancient civilization that lived around a brown dwarf star, and help shape our world as we know it today. Now we are finding evidence of something big that tugs on the planets, and our sun had been acting didffernt maybe just maybe the mayan's clock was the obrit of this star, at its passing it turns everything upside down and sends a lot of debris our way.

  • @chriswirges5202
    @chriswirges5202 Год назад +5

    It's a long shot to say stars like ours are always binary based on that study. There's other data showing a star like ours can be a single. As long as we're throwing out hypothesis. One possiblity is our binary star was a brown dwaft. We couldn't see Pluto with the Hubble, something like that would be very difficult to identify. Or, maybe it was bigger, and just took off. We've seen stars in open space traveling at around a million miles per hour. After as many revolutions as we've traveled around our Milky Way, it could be anywhere.
    The Oort Cloud is a mystery. It's a real possibility that there are cycles that bring objects into our Solar System. Because the Milky Way isn't flat like a plate, but instead it's wavy, there's a variety of explanations as to why this could be happening. Maybe we are passing in and out of a debris field that has somehow remained in a somewhat flat plane.
    If you buy into the hypothesis by JPL that almost all Solar Systems have Super Earths except ours. And after their formation, Saturn and Jupiter began a death spiral towards the Sun (until they got into a gravitational dance that put them into the orbits they are in now). Then one of those original rocky bodies that didn't end up colliding into another, might have been ejected into an extremely oblong orbit that crosses the Oort Cloud.
    Speaking of Super Earths, something is out there beyond Pluto. We can't see it, at least for now, but it's not a debris field. It can only be 1 of 4 things so you pick. A. a Super Earth B. another Neptune C. a captured planet or D. a small Black Hole. D is almost impossible and A&B would have had to be ejected during early planet migration.
    One things for sure, it's not a matter of if, it's a matter of when another object intersects with Earth. We're going to have to understand how to fend off large objects. Here, as soon as possible, but in the not so distant future, on the Moon and then Mars.

  • @Fred_Klingon
    @Fred_Klingon 4 месяца назад

    This is fascinating but a little scary at the same time.
    Imagine if Planet X really exists, and it's orbiting around that star.
    I'm curious to know if this story is true, but it's better to not know the answer 😊

  • @robertevans8126
    @robertevans8126 Год назад

    Yes, it is still affecting our system. Nemesis, was once a Sun, to its 7 planets (Making us a Binary system) but has become a Brown Dwarf now. Planet 6 (Nibiru) orbits upwards and enters our solar system, pass between Jupiter and Mars, right where another planet used to be (Tiamat), then goes around our Sun, and heads back to its Brown Dwarf, and returns in another 3,657-years.

  • @soroushsepahyar
    @soroushsepahyar 8 месяцев назад

    does any one know the name of the music?

  • @kevino8172
    @kevino8172 Год назад +1

    A few years ago i read that Sol's sibling may be HD 162826 about 110ly away, 15% more mass and near Vega in the night sky.

    • @orogenicman
      @orogenicman Год назад

      Vega is only 25ly away from sol, so HD162826 could not be near Vega.

    • @Richard-bq3ni
      @Richard-bq3ni Год назад

      ​@@orogenicman It could appear near Vega in the night sky. Like Jupiter and Venus can appear close in the night sky, but actually are not.

  • @RIZFERD
    @RIZFERD Год назад

    27 million years circle of extinction on Earth, 27 is very familiar number for me, that's age of my Mother passed away with my just born younger sister lived for less than an hour, I was just 2 years 8 months old and since then been living around the world all alone.

  • @X3MgamePlays
    @X3MgamePlays Год назад +8

    There are dozens of other theories out there that could explain the 27 million year extinction patern.

    • @nomdeguerre7265
      @nomdeguerre7265 Год назад +1

      Hypotheses

    • @X3MgamePlays
      @X3MgamePlays Год назад +1

      @@nomdeguerre7265 ah yes, that is a better word

    • @SMERCH_1
      @SMERCH_1 Год назад

      Also the large portion of Earth's history we lost due to erosion and etc

  • @bullshihtology8088
    @bullshihtology8088 Год назад +20

    Maybe the reason why our Solar System is being drawn towards the center of the galaxy is because it felt Nemesis was there..

    • @Alwindar1
      @Alwindar1 Год назад +1

      there is sure a nemesis there.

    • @bkd4303
      @bkd4303 Год назад +1

      ​@@Alwindar1 yes and it is insectoid, not reptilian or AI

    • @achaille9110
      @achaille9110 Год назад +6

      The solar system isn't moving toward the center of the galaxy.

    • @seanhewitt603
      @seanhewitt603 Год назад +1

      If nemesis was flung out on a gravity slingshot, the sun would move the opposite way, being thrown by the release of nemesis' gravity and mass.

    • @lightincircle5982
      @lightincircle5982 Год назад

      nemesis doesnt exist otherwise we wouldnt exist, this video is fake an solar system is not moving to sagittarius A, its actually gonna be catalputed or changed orbits after andromeda an milky way colision

  • @j.d.4697
    @j.d.4697 Год назад +3

    Now this is metaphysical and unscientific, but what if this caused the duality system to become so prevalent among creatures on Earth, both in biology as well as in psychology, culture and art?

  • @williamrutherford1873
    @williamrutherford1873 Год назад

    I hate how these productions take highly speculative “hypothesis” and present it as fact. We have seen star systems forming with only one central star. The “Nemesis” star isn’t a twin, but sun’s rotation around the Milky Way.

  • @brennantafea3205
    @brennantafea3205 Год назад +1

    It would be sort of possible if something just flung Nemesis away quickly as thats the only way i would possibly think this twin sun thing would work if it was ejected and the whole knocking the asteroid towards the earth would be pure coincidence as the supposed twin would have a more likely chance of missing earth.

  • @Salt_Master_Queue
    @Salt_Master_Queue Год назад +1

    4:21 The Space Boulder is conflicted about fighting a young, blind, girl astronaut.

  • @chrisduhaime5689
    @chrisduhaime5689 Год назад +1

    Were most likely a fringe star on the outer edge of the spiral arms of the Galaxy where it's more remote and and quiet .

  • @jonthomson9262
    @jonthomson9262 Год назад +1

    What gravitational force would pull this alleged twin back around every 26 million years?? The sun certainly doesn't have that type of gravitational influence, nor does any reasonably close by stars.

  • @jonthomson9262
    @jonthomson9262 Год назад

    If it's a 26-27 million year cycle....then it's never happened in our lifetime, and it never will. We can't prove anything on these timescales.

  • @deepacharen4534
    @deepacharen4534 Год назад

    🙏🏾💝💝💝💝🙏🏾Thank you very dear friends

  • @seanhewitt603
    @seanhewitt603 Год назад +1

    If you want to find earth like planets, then the starmentioned at3:48 seconds, that'll most likely have similar chemical make up for the planets as Sol.

  • @Rip-Tear-Lacerate64
    @Rip-Tear-Lacerate64 5 месяцев назад

    So, in 2017. Some Scientists was awarded a bunch of awards to tell the Science world that millions of years ago we had a twin or Bi-nary companion.
    Also, what happened to all the videos about so-called Planet X or Nemesis.
    What is You Tube afraid of.
    I have a question. Why is it that the rainbow is always doubled???
    And why are the “Sundowns” getting redder and redder. I’ve been sitting on my surfboard at sundown since 1977. The Sundowns have changed. The color has gotten a deep almost blood red.
    Why are people seeing 2 suns in the sky and posting them online???

  • @davidgriffiths7696
    @davidgriffiths7696 Год назад

    I doubt there is any substantial content here. Mass extinctions are on the 100 million year timescale. The suns oscillation through the galactic plane takes 60 million years, so it could be said that we pass through the radial centre of mass about once every 30 million years, hypothetically passing other stars on their own paths. But a regular cycle of 27 million yr seems unlikely, unless it is associated with the reversal of the gravitational pull and the changing gravitational gradient in the neighbourhood of the sun.

  • @moviemen5710
    @moviemen5710 Год назад +4

    What if proxima centuri is the sun's twin and moved to alpha centuri system by time (just imagination)

  • @keithstevens5614
    @keithstevens5614 Год назад

    Is there a twin? Maybe, maybe not. All that's known is that stars are born in clusters which don't last long. Did it cause the extinction of dinosaurs? No!

  • @jimidoodles
    @jimidoodles Год назад

    Maybe that explains ancient civilizations talking about huge explosions might have been asteroids instead of alien weapons

  • @mgaeeeee9150
    @mgaeeeee9150 Год назад

    I like the theory that Sirius is a binary with the sun. Its likely not the case, but there are some convincing arguments.

  • @derrick211000
    @derrick211000 Год назад

    See what a great video, great topic, title matches content, no pointless filler. Great video love it!

  • @2550205
    @2550205 3 месяца назад

    This king Unas did not die. This King Unas lives as the only star in the shoulder of Nut....
    So if the One star in the shoulder of Nut is Saturn it makes perfect sense.
    Written in stone on the walls of buildings looking like libraries turned inside out.

  • @chronus4421
    @chronus4421 Год назад +1

    This was a good video, thanks!

  • @invader_jim2837
    @invader_jim2837 Год назад

    I can not express enough how laughably devoid of evidence this Nemesis hypothesis has which makes it all the more surprising it is on this channel.

  • @ComradeArthur
    @ComradeArthur Год назад

    If HD186302 does bad things to THIS solar system every 26 million years and it's 185 light years away that is one HELL of an elliptical orbit.

  • @TheSoling27
    @TheSoling27 Год назад

    Velikovsky - Planets in collision - or Thunderbolt project - symbols of an alien sky.

  • @peterdeckenbach1045
    @peterdeckenbach1045 Год назад

    Common origin with Sun was found to be unlikely in a 2019 paper, as HD 186302's galactic orbit is very different from Sun's. Copied from Wikipedia. There is also a link to that paper.

  • @davidcopson5800
    @davidcopson5800 Год назад

    Interesting use of personification.

  • @Angry_Dinosaur
    @Angry_Dinosaur Год назад

    Omg. It takes 240 million years to orbit the galaxy. We don't have a twin pooping on us every 26 million years.

  • @Joe-bw2ew
    @Joe-bw2ew Год назад

    I seen the second sun once. It was very LOW on horizon so you could see it for only 5mins. It was a red dwarf star not bright but angry red. I took photo on my phone but later entire screen went white. I should have messaged it to other phone to save it. BUT............hindsight is 20/20.

  • @amar8703
    @amar8703 Год назад

    We can say that all the stars present in our galaxy milyway are the siblings. All are connected with each other. No star, planet, comet or asteroid could escape our galaxy. But artificial powerful spaceship can. Possibilities are endless.

  • @whipple29wrath-inc.58
    @whipple29wrath-inc.58 Год назад

    Put this in a computer starting with our solar system and go backwards and see if its possible

  • @bobjohnson7020
    @bobjohnson7020 Год назад +2

    I thought the comet cycles were caused by our solar system's elliptical rotation around the galactic core.

    • @MichaelClark-uw7ex
      @MichaelClark-uw7ex Год назад +1

      They also coincide closely to the up/down movement through the plane of the galaxy during ithe sun's orbit

  • @googoogjoobgoogoogjoob
    @googoogjoobgoogoogjoob Год назад +1

    I'm worried 2nd Sun might shine in the middle of the night and wake me up

  • @nidhin4292
    @nidhin4292 Год назад +10

    I read somewhere that Jupiter was the lost twin but due to anomaly in mass it went out to become a planet.

    • @lisanidog8178
      @lisanidog8178 Год назад +1

      Jupiter isn’t a planet. It’s a gas giant.

    • @huntjl88
      @huntjl88 Год назад +3

      @@lisanidog8178 DUH it is a gas giant which is a type of PLANET!! So is Saturn and it is a planet too. My god your teachers should be sued. From the sun out. Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune are the 8 "planets" in our solar system. Plus a lot of smaller planetoids such as Pluto.

    • @lisanidog8178
      @lisanidog8178 Год назад

      @@huntjl88 planets are rocky! Gas giants aren’t so they’re not called planets.

    • @huntjl88
      @huntjl88 Год назад

      @@lisanidog8178 OMG go back to school moron. Planet: A planet is a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and (c) has cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit. What it is made of doesn't matter.

    • @blahlbah8602
      @blahlbah8602 Год назад +1

      @@lisanidog8178

  • @raopsepol
    @raopsepol Год назад +1

    Meh, its much more sense that the other sun was fused with the current one.

  • @little1942
    @little1942 Год назад

    “There was a sibling but…she ate it.” 😁

  • @jr.tvvlog5729
    @jr.tvvlog5729 Год назад

    Watching from KSA jeddah ofw

  • @RiverSprite30
    @RiverSprite30 Год назад +2

    Because it became Jupiter.

    • @user-đæþñœçəüž
      @user-đæþñœçəüž 5 месяцев назад

      If that was true. There would be 4 more planets. IF NEMESIS exists. Hes at the outerrrr ort cloud

  • @BassBashin
    @BassBashin Год назад +1

    I’ll believe it when you show me a real picture of the twin star. Where is it?

  • @alecheesacker4460
    @alecheesacker4460 Год назад

    The Blue Sun blows cold within Doctor Who.

  • @AdamosDad
    @AdamosDad Год назад

    The meteor that killed the dinosaurs, was fired from a 1911.☀

  • @markbishop9225
    @markbishop9225 Год назад

    What proof is there for this theory?

  • @wingcommander1794
    @wingcommander1794 Год назад

    Jupiter was the missing twin . it is called a failed star which almost became a star but ended up being a planet

  • @WingManFang1
    @WingManFang1 Год назад +1

    It only makes since that our system was or is a binary system. We could still have one if it’s a distant Brown dwarf we might not even see it to this day without knowing where to look at exactly the right time.

  • @ngud_gaming267
    @ngud_gaming267 Год назад

    👀umm was any science actually done here? Guess we all started out as eggs from Cthulhu since we’re just throwing random theories out there

  • @johnjosepholiva1842
    @johnjosepholiva1842 Год назад +1

    I think Jupiter is the twin of our sun but Jupiter is a failed star