(At 29:52) In numerical it is clearly mentioned that k is total spring constant (not each), and professor has taken it as single so it is typo error in question. but again in final step (34:25) Fo was there in formula (which is 490 N) but professor has taken it 1000N.
Thank you Prof. Kumar for a great lecture. I have a couple of questions. Here's the first: Many isolation pads use neoprene or rubber. I'm also looking at a vinyl chloride elastomeric resin. Why is it so difficult to find the damping value, c, of these materials? Do you have some typical values for these materials? Thanks.
(At 29:52) In numerical it is clearly mentioned that k is total spring constant (not each), and professor has taken it as single so it is typo error in question.
but again in final step (34:25) Fo was there in formula (which is 490 N) but professor has taken it 1000N.
Sir for obtaining ftr. Taking f0==1000 but fo==490N according to question.
Excellent👍
Ty very much sir
ty very much sir
Thank you Prof. Kumar for a great lecture. I have a couple of questions. Here's the first:
Many isolation pads use neoprene or rubber. I'm also looking at a vinyl chloride elastomeric resin. Why is it so difficult to find the damping value, c, of these materials? Do you have some typical values for these materials? Thanks.
Sir, if Ftr>Fo, then isn't it that Tr>1. Isn't that wrong?