if you have a existing build and want to upgrade say from a 3600 to a 5800x3d then its a good deal unless you want a totally new build, you maybe able to cover some of the cost by selling your ddr4 and mobo but overall you would be better of keeping the existing platform for at least another year till the tech matures a bit more and prices on the new platform become lower.
I am realy happy i just skipped 5800x3d with my 7900xtx , i did it becouse of i am using ultrawide 1440p(3440x1440) , so i just decided to suffer just a bit over 3 mouths with old cpu and wait for reasonable nextgen x3d cpu. which is this one. Price was rocksolid 960e open box 7900xtx OC gaming + 7800x3d , solid combo bit under 1500euro, i cant complain whatsoever with currently realy harsh pricing in Europe at all :).
@@BelfastBiker costs saving and fast it is but it can still actualy bottleneck this gpu pretty severely in newly released titles + its end of platform .. i have still pcie 3 mobo (not ideal), so i just went for future proofing platform instead with pcie 5 gpu, cpu , hdd support x670e + supported socket. Lets be honnest i had r5600. Bottleneck was often realy brutal , jump to 5800x3d would be significant but not that significant and i would be forced to upgrade it all earlier anyway.. so these 430euro extra for complete actual hig-end platform was worth it. I also wasnt able to fully use my pcie 4x nvme disk btw :) + i am using 3440x1440 not 4k thats also factor to consider :).
cpu vs cpu benchmark it is .Accept that fact..... that powerfull 4090 is there to avoid gpu bottleneck by cpu bottleneck. thats makes it accurate cpu benchmark without any risk whatsover to get tricky results by low gpu performance. with maxxed details + RT that result would be limited (bottlenecked) by 4090s performance heavyly.
guy tested it exactly how is should be tested. ddr4 3600mhz for 5800x3d is sweet, while 7800x3d doesnt scale to much with clocks at ddr5. 6200mhz is more then enough(its pretty much overkill) . Maybe you can get just bit more with extra low timigs in some cases, but its nothing special, i personaly bought 6000mhz , clk 32 only becouse of it was realy good deal.
Msfs 2020 thanks for using that game helps alot
if you have a existing build and want to upgrade say from a 3600 to a 5800x3d then its a good deal unless you want a totally new build, you maybe able to cover some of the cost by selling your ddr4 and mobo but overall you would be better of keeping the existing platform for at least another year till the tech matures a bit more and prices on the new platform become lower.
I am realy happy i just skipped 5800x3d with my 7900xtx , i did it becouse of i am using ultrawide 1440p(3440x1440) , so i just decided to suffer just a bit over 3 mouths with old cpu and wait for reasonable nextgen x3d cpu. which is this one. Price was rocksolid 960e open box 7900xtx OC gaming + 7800x3d , solid combo bit under 1500euro, i cant complain whatsoever with currently realy harsh pricing in Europe at all :).
from this comparison, both are stupidly fantastic, and the 5800x3d + cheap board and ram is a significant cost saving.
@@BelfastBiker costs saving and fast it is but it can still actualy bottleneck this gpu pretty severely in newly released titles + its end of platform .. i have still pcie 3 mobo (not ideal), so i just went for future proofing platform instead with pcie 5 gpu, cpu , hdd support x670e + supported socket. Lets be honnest i had r5600. Bottleneck was often realy brutal , jump to 5800x3d would be significant but not that significant and i would be forced to upgrade it all earlier anyway.. so these 430euro extra for complete actual hig-end platform was worth it. I also wasnt able to fully use my pcie 4x nvme disk btw :) + i am using 3440x1440 not 4k thats also factor to consider :).
Is this the simulated X3D or did this go online earlier than the test embargo?
i think it is not simulated.
The 5800x3d is only $320-$300
if it is true that you have the 7800x3d put in the video photo with your name and cpu
At gpu usage this is still a bottleneck at 1440p you must use 1440P MAX + RT or 4K or GPU as a 7900xtx/4080
Ofc it's bottleneck, cuz it's CPU test not GPU
cpu vs cpu benchmark it is .Accept that fact..... that powerfull 4090 is there to avoid gpu bottleneck by cpu bottleneck. thats makes it accurate cpu benchmark without any risk whatsover to get tricky results by low gpu performance. with maxxed details + RT that result would be limited (bottlenecked) by 4090s performance heavyly.
this test shows that everyone must buy 4090 or noob.
this test shows that everyone must have your mom or noob.
@@xelerator2398 did this comment really bother you... noob? Go whip out 4090 or you noob... I'm serious
3600 MHz RAM sticks vs 6200? In itself it gives 15-20 FPS so there is no such huge difference in CPU. It's RAM speed test, not CPU
thats exactly what i was thinking
You can't run more than 3800 ram on Ryzen 5000
@@digitaltestings Yeah, but you can run lower then 6200 on 7800 :P
guy tested it exactly how is should be tested. ddr4 3600mhz for 5800x3d is sweet, while 7800x3d doesnt scale to much with clocks at ddr5. 6200mhz is more then enough(its pretty much overkill) . Maybe you can get just bit more with extra low timigs in some cases, but its nothing special, i personaly bought 6000mhz , clk 32 only becouse of it was realy good deal.
@@Kratochvil1989 so we can agree to disagree.