Another follower from Conspiracy R Us channel. Appears his recommendation has breathed new life into your channel. I subbed hoping for more. Interesting video. Thank you.
Some people believe this was how they dated the Mellenial reign of Christ...but, I can't figure out Why they would build Forts at that time...as the Bible says they will Not learn War during this period...So, maybe the structure never was a Fort...but, something else??? Wondering...I'm not saying I agree with the above view...but...still studying.
looks like the French went looking for something. an artifact maybe? 3 years to look for it requiring them to destroy part or the walls and the ground? Then once De Galaud found what he is looking for, he just abandons the fort. Then he travels to other exotic locations after he goes back to France and meets with the king and plans a bunch of other similar missions. Looks like they are collecting a bunch of artefacts with significant strategic value.
Amazing video!! I've never heard of this site before. Thank you! P.S. next time, please don't put music in the background. Your voice is more than enough.
Just FYI RUclips channel CONSPIRACY-R-US Featured your video in his video from today May 19 2022, thinking you have stopped making content a few years back. I saw that you replied to a comment as recent as 4 months ago which say that you are still around. Brother, if you made more like this video, and could put yourself out there with the Truth Seeking Community, perhaps doing any collaboration, but primarily making MORE LIKE THIS ONE, I would.expect your channel to grow enough to get monetized and turn a little coin into your pockets. To that and as motivation I am subscribing and going back to the Conspiracy r us comments to post that you are still a love member of the world and suggest others come here and annoy you to also make some more new content!
Maybe this fort was built when the climate was a little warmer. Older maps show Antarctica’s ring of islands or land and most of Florida under water or a swamp. People would be dropping like flies building a structure in harsh conditions, the calories needed to survive that cold .
Good information but please put less volume on the background music (drums). It makes it hard to hear and focus on the information given. Other wise good video.
This seems like another piece in the puzzle of true history. Perhaps alone, it may not be enough to draw any logical conclusions, but when combined with many others, hopefully a clearer picture will form. Thank you!
Great pyramids were cast. This is a pretty clear case, you can see it in some of the big blocks. Question who and why it was done. Some believe it was done by Napoleon‘s army. The smaller pyramids of Egypt are genuine.
@@frederick4929 The hoax / fraud / crime was committed against humankind by the secret society criminal cartel known as the freemasons - which is controlled by the Rothschilds. The hoax is multi-faceted, multi-layered and multi-dimensional with the agenda of rending the public ignorant, confused and easy to manipulate and exploit - this includes programming and indoctrinating the children, teens, college students, grad students, PhD's, the general public, etc., with lies about politics and economics, democracy and freedom, equality and justice, history, chemistry, geology, glaciology, volcanology, botany, astronomy and so on. Almost everything taught to the public is lies - this includes the timeline for Egyptology, the historical timeline of thousands and thousands of years, the fake biblical timeline of nearly 6,000 years, the timeline for the eruption of Yellowstone, the timeline for the CO2 in ice cores, the timeline for the ice sheets, the timeline for the formation of the Grand Canyon, the timeline for Earth's expansion, the timeline for the broken and subducted tectonic plates, the timeline for the formation of the Yucatan Peninsula, the timeline for our Earth's origins and so on. If you want the timeline for any of that - and/or if you want the forces responsible for the geological formations, the formation of the oceans, the formation of our mountains, the formation of the Arabian, Italian, Iberian, Floridian, Yucatan or Olympic Peninsulas, etc., if you want to know when and how our ice sheets across Greenland and Antarctica formed, if you want to know when and how the tectonic plates were broken and subducted, you can find all of this clearly documented in hundreds of historic documents, written in dozens of languages from all across our Earth by people who lived several centuries apart and in different regions of our Earth. Since we can see we've been lied to about the history of our Earth, since we can see the lies about ancient Egypt, ancient Persia, ancient Rome, ancient India, ancient China, the ancient Hebrews, the ancient Babylonians and so on, since the true timeline for Julius Caesar and Cleopatra is documented in dozens of independent historic records, since the true timeline for the eruption of Vesuvius - and the destruction of Pompeii and Herculaneum and dozens of other cities is documented by numerous independent sources - since the true timeline for our Earth's expansion is documented by hundreds of independent sources, since the true timeline for our mountains and oceans and continents is documented, we know the public is being intentionally lied to. We know their timeline lies cloak the true timeline which the billionaires are desperate to hide because the true timeline exposes their ancestry and lineage - which they do not want the public to know. If and when the public realizes the truth about our world, the billionaires and their mindless sock puppet millionaire minions will cease to exist.
@@frederick4929 The Great Pyramids were erected decades after Napoleon's invasion of Egypt - although his hidden hand exposes him as a member of the Rothschilds mindless sock puppet brigade of idiots.
I am new to this subject but in trying to research any history of the why and how of these forts all over the world, the mainstream narrative is lame and lacking details. Would love more content on the subject. No person I mention these to have ever even heard of them.
That fortress is going to come in handy yet. An ice free port that far north, that far inland is going to be invaluable in the comics Arctic war with Putin.
Hi I live in Churchill and have some things to add the mortar was added later but was just a make work project to keep people busy and employed the odd building across the river was ware they stored there powder until they realized that if a shot went astray they could easily blow up there own gun powder and the most interesting thing is that there is a mason buried in the Fort
A Mason buried at the fort !? Wow ! I did not come across this in my research, if u have any links please post them in a comment or email me at thurt1eht@gmail.com. I am working on a follow up video and I'd love to have this information. Thanks COTV !
Well done....I think it's pretty obvious that something was found on the site of the fort when it was found, and the HBC decided to enhance it with a modern overlay; the idea and science of the "star fort" design was well known by 1700AD. A pre-existing structure would significantly cut down on the time and effort required to build a different structure. As well, finding Masonic symbols carved into military structures is not unusual, as "military lodges" were becoming widespread in European regiments by the early 1700's. Also, record keeping at this time was pretty spotty by modern standards, and should be looked at with a weather eye. However. I find the _"SLU SH"_ carving to be a smoking gun, because "someone" clearly knew that Hudson Bay was a central pivot point for the North Pole's progression, as that is the only reason to write something like that. Whatever purpose the prehistoric structure was built for, the original builders clearly knew about this feature of the location, as did those who came later, both French and English. I have come to the conclusion that there was a great deal more activity going on in North America - at least - prior to 1800 than most realize, and that history has been deliberately sanitized as a result...but they couldn't hide everything, and simply dismissing questions about the subject is increasingly failing to dissuade the curious. Keep at it.
I love what you have said. I came to a similar conclusion about the SLU SH meaning it could be a past location of the North Pole. The Ancient people called North America Turtle Island and the idea of the turtles shell turning on its axis makes perfect sense to me that it was a past North Pole sight. I think there has been an attempt to cover up the actual timeline of history, and this fort helps prove there's more to the official narrative.
SLU SH might well have been the recipe for the mortar, telling those that follow what to use to repair the fort as it ages. Crushed shells in the mortar base. Is it possibly the date was i 766 not 1766.
Duly noted and I hope you find I've done a better job with the audio in the following videos I've released. Keep the criticism coming it helps me make the videos better. Thanks Mo !
Could this fort be a spot of a past North Pole? I saw some research about ancient sites lining up with places the actual north pole used to be over tens of thousands years ago. That could be what SLU and SH means. The spot of the North Pole where they thought the giant turtle/North America would turn around that axis maybe? Does that even make sense lol? (Like the shell of the turtle spinning on its axis at that spot is what SLU and SH could have meant)
That's an interesting theory. We could check with the precession of equinoxes, or other polar shifting theories to see of it lines up? I will look as well to see what I can find. Maybe we can find someone or org who has mapped this out. Good stuff!
@@thurt1eht yes! I will look for that research of past North poles. I remember it showed that certain ancient sites perfectly line up with these past North poles and the structures in Peru line Up with a north pole that was hundreds of thousands years old! I can't remember what the other ones were but Baalbek was one of them and the Acropolis in Greece was another. It showed that they lined up with North poles that were tens of thousands years old. The Peru sites were the oldest.
Slush is probably referencing Sloop Cove which is 3.2kms away. Remember many of the 39 men here were not formally educated so they used phonetics to spell words
Thanks for the feedback, I have had a lot of the same comments for the audio of this vid and definitely taking it into account for the others. I think I've gotten better at the audio in followong videos. Thanks again.
@@thurt1eht I liked the music. It is a matter of taste sure. But it is a great video content-wise, Sir, big compliment! I think you as the maker have the right to determine music, style and pace, don’t let the critics put you down. This video is great be proud of it.
LOL, a conspiracy? that’s hilarious. altho sort of an insult to the people who actually built this fort. all of which is thoroughly documented in the HBC records. btw the mortar appears cosmetic because it is. parks canada did the work as a restoration project.
The design of the fort is on par with the designs in use from the time period, especially when it comes to the use of cannon. The reason it probably took so long to construct the fort was probably due to the weather, if you only have four months of warm weather you aren't going to have long to construct a fort. Back when castles and cathedrals were being made they always halted major construction during the winter. Plus a governor wanted the walls narrower than was recommended which also prolonged the construction. Also the transportation of materials is also a factor in to why it took so long. As to why there were no soldiers at the fort it should be kept in mind the American Revolution was being fought at the time and perhaps the British did not consider the fort to be important at the time. The war was not just fought in America but also around the rest of the world as well including India and the Caribbean. In a war you're going to be stretched for manpower and you're not going to be defending any place you do not think is important. The British might have thought the invasion through Hudson's Bay to be impractical. Not to mention this was comparatively small force and if they couldn't destroy the fort they would have to move on.
Thank god, someone with common sense! Everything you said is true and makes sense. I don't know why people stray so far away from thinking practically lately. My only guess would be that creating mystery is more appealing and entertaining to the idle mind.
Janet Benz tartarian empire? Slowly more is being revealed of a past where we had tremendous understanding of all the elements available freely to us. Sadly money & greed became more powerful than understanding who we are and what our magnificent capabilities can do.
@Schizoidboy I appreciate your insights, though I don't agree with everything you said, you do make a lot of good points especially about the American revolution and soldiers being stretched thin. Indeed this war was being fought all over the world, and this phenomenon of building structures that they did not have enough soldiers to properly man is not exclusive to the British, but also apparently occurred with the French, Spanish, Portuguese, and Dutch. That being said, there are still many questions that remain, like the structure's relationship to the Masons, the motivation to put 40+ years into its construction, and why mortar was added to the walls that do not help with the structure's integrity, well after the building was being used. One thing is for sure this structure is amazing, one of Canada's hidden treasures, and the people responsible for building it should be remembered and appreciated. I am working on a follow up video to this one and I'll be sure to address and include some of the points you've made. Though we may disagree with certain aspects of historical accounts, it's important that we continue to have civilized discussions and share our theories and speculations. Thanks for watching and sharing your thoughts !
U.S.A. has native Americans as does Canada. Are these Native Canadian Indians?? My great grandmother was a Canadian Abnaqki Indian from Roxton Falls Canada
Canada is part of North America The separation of this continent happened in recent times when thinking of the history of the people who inhabited this continent. So the natives who occupied what is now called Canada are most definitely Native Americans. In Canada we are taught to call all "native Americans" a different name, it's " Indigeous" and not Native Americans.
There may be some truth to that. The oldest masonic symbol found in Canada resides at this fort, and the Masons, to put it lightly, are not the biggest fans of organized religion.
Your history is a bit wobbly. You are working too hard to create a sensational drama. Not necessary. The true story is dramatic enough. You should read a bit more actual history of the HBC, re-do this video.
If the fort had never seen battle, then they must have burned the fort down themselves. So that may have been accidental or intentional. But if it had not seen battle in all those years, why rebuild it in the same location? Why expense so much resource and labour rebuilding a fort that is clearly enough of a hindrance as to have burned down without having seen a battle? Doesn't that seem odd? If you found lots of flaws in this video, what are some of the others?
1 more point in addition to the things pointed out by what question ; the Hudson's Bay Company had many forts that burned down, yet churchill was the only fort that was rebuilt with stone. Before you say it was because churchill was an important fort, according to HBC, it wasn't. Not even close. The most profitable fur trading post was making more than 10 times what churchill was making. Yet another point ; almost everytime a fort burned down, it was rebuilt in a different location because the ruins were so bad it was too difficult to rebuild. Read about York Factory to see this. Too many things don't add up.
Interesting video. However if I may play Devil's Advocate... the native Canadians and the French settlers had a peaceful relationship. There was no peaceful relationship between the native population and the British occupiers of Canada. The Canadians never agreed to joining Britain it was stolen from France. Perhaps if they really upgraded the fort it was because they knew the British were coming. It is curious to note that star forts appear around the world in countries that were once French populations.
Interesting thought Loagun ! However from my understanding this fort was built by James knight for the Hudson Bay Company, who was loyal to and supported by the British crown. I am making a follow up video with more info (and better audio) perhaps this will shed some more light on the subject. Thanks for watching and commenting !
Another follower from Conspiracy R Us channel. Appears his recommendation has breathed new life into your channel. I subbed hoping for more. Interesting video. Thank you.
Me too!
@@cynthiapate9138 ditto
Conspiracy R Us sent me, good video!
The wall doesn't read; 1766, it's an "I", as in "IN the year of our Lord, 766. A lot of old maps from the 15th and 16th centuries show this phenomena.
1000 years of hidden deceptive history ..
exactly what I was about to say lol
@@raehughes a thousand years is still most generous and convenient for the reality generating machine
Some people believe this was how they dated the Mellenial reign of Christ...but, I can't figure out Why they would build Forts at that time...as the Bible says they will Not learn War during this period...So, maybe the structure never was a Fort...but, something else??? Wondering...I'm not saying I agree with the above view...but...still studying.
looks like the French went looking for something. an artifact maybe? 3 years to look for it requiring them to destroy part or the walls and the ground? Then once De Galaud found what he is looking for, he just abandons the fort. Then he travels to other exotic locations after he goes back to France and meets with the king and plans a bunch of other similar missions. Looks like they are collecting a bunch of artefacts with significant strategic value.
You make a fantastic case. Thank you sir
Very interesting, Thanx for sharing. Will definitely check out the rest of your video's . So much of our history is covered up
Thanks for the nice presentation! Subscribed. Took a minute to get into the groove, but now Im grooving too :)
Great video! So well researched. Thank you.
Man this is incredible and very full of all the right details. Great job. We need more of these places documented within Canada. Keep it up great job.
It is complete and total horsesh*t.
@@shakes.dontknowwhatyergettin keep drinking the Trudy kool-aid dippitus shiticus
Amazing video!! I've never heard of this site before. Thank you! P.S. next time, please don't put music in the background. Your voice is more than enough.
Min 10:24 it says J752 not 1752
Just FYI RUclips channel
CONSPIRACY-R-US
Featured your video in his video from today May 19 2022, thinking you have stopped making content a few years back. I saw that you replied to a comment as recent as 4 months ago which say that you are still around. Brother, if you made more like this video, and could put yourself out there with the Truth Seeking Community, perhaps doing any collaboration, but primarily making MORE LIKE THIS ONE, I would.expect your channel to grow enough to get monetized and turn a little coin into your pockets. To that and as motivation I am subscribing and going back to the Conspiracy r us comments to post that you are still a love member of the world and suggest others come here and annoy you to also make some more new content!
Link to video on CONSPIRACY-R-US RUclips channel telling viewers to come here:
ruclips.net/video/qvChg9tmPTM/видео.html
Maybe this fort was built when the climate was a little warmer. Older maps show Antarctica’s ring of islands or land and most of Florida under water or a swamp. People would be dropping like flies building a structure in harsh conditions, the calories needed to survive that cold .
Came here via conspiracy-r-us, many thanks & I'm hoping that you'll come back & continue to make vids.
Good information but please put less volume on the background music (drums). It makes it hard to hear and focus on the information given. Other wise good video.
Check out Jon Levi, Static in the Attic and Max Igan.... nice work!
This seems like another piece in the puzzle of true history. Perhaps alone, it may not be enough to draw any logical conclusions, but when combined with many others, hopefully a clearer picture will form. Thank you!
@2:19 Look at the size of those colossal stones - erected in the early 1700's - but no one knows how the Great Pyramids were constructed?
Great pyramids were cast. This is a pretty clear case, you can see it in some of the big blocks. Question who and why it was done. Some believe it was done by Napoleon‘s army. The smaller pyramids of Egypt are genuine.
@@frederick4929 The hoax / fraud / crime was committed against humankind by the secret society criminal cartel known as the freemasons - which is controlled by the Rothschilds. The hoax is multi-faceted, multi-layered and multi-dimensional with the agenda of rending the public ignorant, confused and easy to manipulate and exploit - this includes programming and indoctrinating the children, teens, college students, grad students, PhD's, the general public, etc., with lies about politics and economics, democracy and freedom, equality and justice, history, chemistry, geology, glaciology, volcanology, botany, astronomy and so on.
Almost everything taught to the public is lies - this includes the timeline for Egyptology, the historical timeline of thousands and thousands of years, the fake biblical timeline of nearly 6,000 years, the timeline for the eruption of Yellowstone, the timeline for the CO2 in ice cores, the timeline for the ice sheets, the timeline for the formation of the Grand Canyon, the timeline for Earth's expansion, the timeline for the broken and subducted tectonic plates, the timeline for the formation of the Yucatan Peninsula, the timeline for our Earth's origins and so on.
If you want the timeline for any of that - and/or if you want the forces responsible for the geological formations, the formation of the oceans, the formation of our mountains, the formation of the Arabian, Italian, Iberian, Floridian, Yucatan or Olympic Peninsulas, etc., if you want to know when and how our ice sheets across Greenland and Antarctica formed, if you want to know when and how the tectonic plates were broken and subducted, you can find all of this clearly documented in hundreds of historic documents, written in dozens of languages from all across our Earth by people who lived several centuries apart and in different regions of our Earth.
Since we can see we've been lied to about the history of our Earth, since we can see the lies about ancient Egypt, ancient Persia, ancient Rome, ancient India, ancient China, the ancient Hebrews, the ancient Babylonians and so on, since the true timeline for Julius Caesar and Cleopatra is documented in dozens of independent historic records, since the true timeline for the eruption of Vesuvius - and the destruction of Pompeii and Herculaneum and dozens of other cities is documented by numerous independent sources - since the true timeline for our Earth's expansion is documented by hundreds of independent sources, since the true timeline for our mountains and oceans and continents is documented, we know the public is being intentionally lied to.
We know their timeline lies cloak the true timeline which the billionaires are desperate to hide because the true timeline exposes their ancestry and lineage - which they do not want the public to know.
If and when the public realizes the truth about our world, the billionaires and their mindless sock puppet millionaire minions will cease to exist.
@@frederick4929 The Great Pyramids were erected decades after Napoleon's invasion of Egypt - although his hidden hand exposes him as a member of the Rothschilds mindless sock puppet brigade of idiots.
@9:16 the date is J733 - not 1733.
I am new to this subject but in trying to research any history of the why and how of these forts all over the world, the mainstream narrative is lame and lacking details. Would love more content on the subject. No person I mention these to have ever even heard of them.
That fortress is going to come in handy yet. An ice free port that far north, that far inland is going to be invaluable in the comics Arctic war with Putin.
Re; quarry looks like ancient block work walls, and the fort walls all look like geopolymar. Definitely a cover up!
Hi I live in Churchill and have some things to add the mortar was added later but was just a make work project to keep people busy and employed the odd building across the river was ware they stored there powder until they realized that if a shot went astray they could easily blow up there own gun powder and the most interesting thing is that there is a mason buried in the Fort
A Mason buried at the fort !? Wow ! I did not come across this in my research, if u have any links please post them in a comment or email me at thurt1eht@gmail.com. I am working on a follow up video and I'd love to have this information. Thanks COTV !
@Robert Williamson way to focus on the subject at hand.
Ooh! Great video, great mystery!
Bravo sir amazing video hope to see you come back please
Year might be J752 and not 1752
9:18, J 753, or J 733, not 1733/53. Jesuit eraser marks. Awesome research mate!
Very, very strange.
Have a look at the old Winnipeg city hall.
Look into Fort Blunder aka Fort Montgomery
Up state NY
Well done....I think it's pretty obvious that something was found on the site of the fort when it was found, and the HBC decided to enhance it with a modern overlay; the idea and science of the "star fort" design was well known by 1700AD. A pre-existing structure would significantly cut down on the time and effort required to build a different structure. As well, finding Masonic symbols carved into military structures is not unusual, as "military lodges" were becoming widespread in European regiments by the early 1700's. Also, record keeping at this time was pretty spotty by modern standards, and should be looked at with a weather eye.
However.
I find the _"SLU SH"_ carving to be a smoking gun, because "someone" clearly knew that Hudson Bay was a central pivot point for the North Pole's progression, as that is the only reason to write something like that. Whatever purpose the prehistoric structure was built for, the original builders clearly knew about this feature of the location, as did those who came later, both French and English. I have come to the conclusion that there was a great deal more activity going on in North America - at least - prior to 1800 than most realize, and that history has been deliberately sanitized as a result...but they couldn't hide everything, and simply dismissing questions about the subject is increasingly failing to dissuade the curious.
Keep at it.
I love what you have said. I came to a similar conclusion about the SLU SH meaning it could be a past location of the North Pole. The Ancient people called North America Turtle Island and the idea of the turtles shell turning on its axis makes perfect sense to me that it was a past North Pole sight. I think there has been an attempt to cover up the actual timeline of history, and this fort helps prove there's more to the official narrative.
9:27, again J 752, or 752, not the added 1000 years.Thanks!
SLU SH might well have been the recipe for the mortar, telling those that follow what to use to repair the fort as it ages. Crushed shells in the mortar base.
Is it possibly the date was i 766 not 1766.
@2:30 Samuel Hearne and Jean-Francois de Galaup look an awful lot, like the same person
perhaps even brothers
Can you get rid of that awful backing sound? It makes it hard to concentrate on the message.
Duly noted and I hope you find I've done a better job with the audio in the following videos I've released. Keep the criticism coming it helps me make the videos better. Thanks Mo !
@@thurt1eht
I dont mind the music but its like 20% too loud and does become distracting at times. Either way, great video.
Great info! Thanks!
This is cool as fuck, these things are everywhere, we have being fed bullshit, and its alot of fun watching everyone uncover it all. Good shit dude
That’s not 1752, it’s j752. Two very different things
9:00 that doesn't look like "1733". It looks like J733 ... Jesus 733 ... 733 years after Jesus birth.
Please release a version without the music, cant hear you :(..
Excellent show
Jesus bless you
Very interesting!
That “1” in 1752 is looking more like a “J” to me..
Supporting the 1,000 year reign of Christ.
“in the year of Jesus 752”
Yeah but look at the 7. it also has the curve at the bottom
J752; not 1752. Look into Star Forts (like this one); they’re all over the earth!
Very interesting video
Could this fort be a spot of a past North Pole? I saw some research about ancient sites lining up with places the actual north pole used to be over tens of thousands years ago. That could be what SLU and SH means. The spot of the North Pole where they thought the giant turtle/North America would turn around that axis maybe? Does that even make sense lol? (Like the shell of the turtle spinning on its axis at that spot is what SLU and SH could have meant)
That's an interesting theory. We could check with the precession of equinoxes, or other polar shifting theories to see of it lines up? I will look as well to see what I can find. Maybe we can find someone or org who has mapped this out. Good stuff!
@@thurt1eht yes! I will look for that research of past North poles. I remember it showed that certain ancient sites perfectly line up with these past North poles and the structures in Peru line Up with a north pole that was hundreds of thousands years old!
I can't remember what the other ones were but Baalbek was one of them and the Acropolis in Greece was another. It showed that they lined up with North poles that were tens of thousands years old. The Peru sites were the oldest.
9:25 J752
Older? Fish sticks! (With Tartar sauce)
Hmm.....Tartarian sauce?
Was definitely found
Slush is probably referencing Sloop Cove which is 3.2kms away. Remember many of the 39 men here were not formally educated so they used phonetics to spell words
Great work but the background music is terrible
Tell me more about the native Indian mounds of California
Tartarian star fort from the previous world
The INVISIBLE RAINBOW
A History of Electricity and Life
Arthur Firstenberg
I'm not familiar with that author, I'll check it out. Thanks J Kelly !
Interesting 👍👍
Music too LOUD
terrible noise music blocking the narrative, please check your work
Thanks for the feedback, I have had a lot of the same comments for the audio of this vid and definitely taking it into account for the others. I think I've gotten better at the audio in followong videos. Thanks again.
@@thurt1eht yeh the music bckgrnd makes the voice difficult to hear .. the voice over is reay good , its just the background sound to loud ..
@@thurt1eht I liked the music. It is a matter of taste sure. But it is a great video content-wise, Sir, big compliment! I think you as the maker have the right to determine music, style and pace, don’t let the critics put you down. This video is great be proud of it.
It's j752 so year 752
Looks very much like castle independence.
"42 sir"
check in Hudson Bay records...
obin's son ? def found not built and not a garrison
The date is J733.
The letter j and i were used interchangeably until the mid 1500s, I think. Cool eh!
terrific video! Recommended by "Conspracy's-R-Us"
LOL, a conspiracy? that’s hilarious. altho sort of an insult to the people who actually built this fort. all of which is thoroughly documented in the HBC records. btw the mortar appears cosmetic because it is. parks canada did the work as a restoration project.
The design of the fort is on par with the designs in use from the time period, especially when it comes to the use of cannon. The reason it probably took so long to construct the fort was probably due to the weather, if you only have four months of warm weather you aren't going to have long to construct a fort. Back when castles and cathedrals were being made they always halted major construction during the winter. Plus a governor wanted the walls narrower than was recommended which also prolonged the construction. Also the transportation of materials is also a factor in to why it took so long. As to why there were no soldiers at the fort it should be kept in mind the American Revolution was being fought at the time and perhaps the British did not consider the fort to be important at the time. The war was not just fought in America but also around the rest of the world as well including India and the Caribbean. In a war you're going to be stretched for manpower and you're not going to be defending any place you do not think is important. The British might have thought the invasion through Hudson's Bay to be impractical. Not to mention this was comparatively small force and if they couldn't destroy the fort they would have to move on.
take your common sense somewhere else!
Thank god, someone with common sense! Everything you said is true and makes sense. I don't know why people stray so far away from thinking practically lately. My only guess would be that creating mystery is more appealing and entertaining to the idle mind.
Janet Benz tartarian empire? Slowly more is being revealed of a past where we had tremendous understanding of all the elements available freely to us. Sadly money & greed became more powerful than understanding who we are and what our magnificent capabilities can do.
@Schizoidboy I appreciate your insights, though I don't agree with everything you said, you do make a lot of good points especially about the American revolution and soldiers being stretched thin. Indeed this war was being fought all over the world, and this phenomenon of building structures that they did not have enough soldiers to properly man is not exclusive to the British, but also apparently occurred with the French, Spanish, Portuguese, and Dutch. That being said, there are still many questions that remain, like the structure's relationship to the Masons, the motivation to put 40+ years into its construction, and why mortar was added to the walls that do not help with the structure's integrity, well after the building was being used. One thing is for sure this structure is amazing, one of Canada's hidden treasures, and the people responsible for building it should be remembered and appreciated. I am working on a follow up video to this one and I'll be sure to address and include some of the points you've made. Though we may disagree with certain aspects of historical accounts, it's important that we continue to have civilized discussions and share our theories and speculations. Thanks for watching and sharing your thoughts !
Joseph. Robson. Fort prince of wales. Google. Just something I fell upon my readings about this fort.
Thx for the info Joe ! I'm making a follow up video and I'll look into Joseph Robson.
Lower the music
Check the aboot section
no
U.S.A. has native Americans as does Canada. Are these Native Canadian Indians?? My great grandmother was a Canadian Abnaqki Indian from Roxton Falls Canada
Canada is part of North America
The separation of this continent happened in recent times when thinking of the history of the people who inhabited this continent. So the natives who occupied what is now called Canada are most definitely Native Americans. In Canada we are taught to call all "native Americans" a different name, it's " Indigeous" and not Native Americans.
Good video , but the story tellers voice is to low, great jobb otherwise
I think the music is what makes his voice hard to hear. It's a good thing he put the text on the screen.
The music is twice as loud as the narrator’s voice. Hard to listen to.
They needed to give them guys something to do to get them out of society heritics that believed in God.
There may be some truth to that. The oldest masonic symbol found in Canada resides at this fort, and the Masons, to put it lightly, are not the biggest fans of organized religion.
Star forts = tartaria hidden history #TRUTHbeREVEALED
our history is a lie. ..the music is a unnecessary distraction.
first!!!!!!!!!!
1337
Your history is a bit wobbly. You are working too hard to create a sensational drama. Not necessary. The true story is dramatic enough. You should read a bit more actual history of the HBC, re-do this video.
The reason they upgraded the Fort to stone was because it had already burned down once. I saw a lot of flaws in this videos research.
If the fort had never seen battle, then they must have burned the fort down themselves. So that may have been accidental or intentional. But if it had not seen battle in all those years, why rebuild it in the same location? Why expense so much resource and labour rebuilding a fort that is clearly enough of a hindrance as to have burned down without having seen a battle? Doesn't that seem odd?
If you found lots of flaws in this video, what are some of the others?
1 more point in addition to the things pointed out by what question ; the Hudson's Bay Company had many forts that burned down, yet churchill was the only fort that was rebuilt with stone. Before you say it was because churchill was an important fort, according to HBC, it wasn't. Not even close. The most profitable fur trading post was making more than 10 times what churchill was making. Yet another point ; almost everytime a fort burned down, it was rebuilt in a different location because the ruins were so bad it was too difficult to rebuild. Read about York Factory to see this. Too many things don't add up.
ya lots of trees grow in churchhill?big solid trees to build a sturdy fort?
they would of had a harder time hauling trees to that site then they would of cutting the stone?
Absolute garbage. Its just an abandoned fort.
Interesting video. However if I may play Devil's Advocate... the native Canadians and the French settlers had a peaceful relationship. There was no peaceful relationship between the native population and the British occupiers of Canada. The Canadians never agreed to joining Britain it was stolen from France. Perhaps if they really upgraded the fort it was because they knew the British were coming. It is curious to note that star forts appear around the world in countries that were once French populations.
Interesting thought Loagun ! However from my understanding this fort was built by James knight for the Hudson Bay Company, who was loyal to and supported by the British crown. I am making a follow up video with more info (and better audio) perhaps this will shed some more light on the subject. Thanks for watching and commenting !
@@thurt1eht i look forward to watching it! I another good video saved in one of my playlists on this fort. If i can find it I'll share the link.