absolute knowledge within time?.. it relatives the term "absolute" then, or it is mean absolute within that "time frame"??.. why (forced) use the term absolute ??...ambition of man??...
Absolute Knowledge is not limited to time & space and it is not knowledge of the Mind, which is limited to form/objects & subject. Absolute Knowledge, is SELF Knowledge. Not Ego = subject/object Knowledge.
I am only 10 minutes in and can tell this guy is brilliant and helps clarify
Hegel's project.
Thank you my friend.
Zizek's friend/colleague, part of the 'troika'
Mladen Dolar is one of the most intelligent people alive.
Beautifully Done
Dolar Dolar bills yo
What is lost, was never possesed
@conforzoI think @maxteba's point was precisely that this is false. Something need never have been possessed to be lost.
Or rather it is what is that has never been possessed but always lost hence it's possessed as a loss
... That's dank.
amazing
Brilliant and erudite.
I'll probably write about it later on, so that all of who are skeptical about it become sure of my "illusions."
There is passage in the phenomenology that talks about the inner and outer. I think that summaries what he was really trying to say
Chris Scott I'm here from how to fake Hegel too..
wait what
The loss of the loss
absolute knowledge within time?.. it relatives the term "absolute" then, or it is mean absolute within that "time frame"??.. why (forced) use the term absolute ??...ambition of man??...
Absolute Knowledge is not limited to time & space and it is not knowledge of the Mind, which is limited to form/objects & subject.
Absolute Knowledge, is SELF Knowledge.
Not Ego = subject/object Knowledge.