Kobe Bryant Torches Carmelo’s Nuggets in 3rd Game of 2005-06 Season | Full Highlights
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 25 авг 2024
- #kobe #alwaysandforever
Thanks for watching!
Thumbs up, comment, share.
Sub/🔔 for new Kobe videos.
-
Kobe Bryant
Hidden Gem Full Highlights (Rare)
All Field Goal Attempts
LA Lakers vs Denver Nuggets
November 6, 2005
Staples Center
- 37 pts, 8r, 5a, 1b / 16-31 fg, 5-5 ft
This was the Lakers’ 3rd regular season game of 2005-06. Having been granted Phil’s unwavering instruction to “let loose,” Kobe continued his aggressive approach offensively. Near the beginning of the last video (vs Phoenix) while Kobe was at the free throw line, Doug Collins described a conversation he had with Phil regarding Kobe’s 3pt attempts. Phil wanted Kobe to not necessarily shoot a lesser amount of 3’s, but rather to post a higher percentage across the board.
Kobe started the season unleashing from everywhere except beyond the arc. Through the first 8 games, he took only 6 three-pointers out of 218 total shot attempts. This was soon to change - as the season progressed, Kobe’s assertiveness from deep increased. He finished November averaging 3.0/game, logged 4.9 in December, 8.9 in January, 9.1 in February, and 6.6 in March/April. On the season, Kobe ended up taking a career high 6.5 three-pointers/game, shooting a very respectable 35%.
Despite logging 7.1 more FGA’s/game than the campaign prior (2004-05), Kobe elevated all three major percentage categories (fg-3pt-ft) by a notable amount. Included in the following data are relative subcategories.
2004-05 2005-06
*Dist - 13.9 ft 15.1 ft
FG - 43.3% 45.0%
2PT - 47.2% 48.2%
3PT - 33.9% 34.7%
FT - 81.6% 85.0%
^0-3 60.6% 59.8%
^3-10 42.7% 49.4%
^10-16 36.0% 45.5%
^16-3pt 38.4% 42.1%
*Average Distance of FGA (ft)
^2PT FG% by Distance (ft)
True Shooting percentage was intentionally omitted from the comparison above. TS% is a measure of shooting efficiency that takes into account field goals, 3pt field goals, and free throws. It can often function as a misleading statistic. TS% is capable of being hijacked by players whose points are scored primarily from layups/dunks and/or wide open jumpers because it does not consider volume and degree of difficulty (i.e. Player A [superstar] takes 25 contested FGA’s/game vs Player B [role player] takes 10 lightly contested or “beneficiary” FGA’s/game created for him). Where shots are attempted from (distance) is also unrepresented. In addition, the stat heavily rewards players who achieve free throw opportunities at a high rate relative to their total FGA’s. This in part is why Kobe logged a higher TS% in 2004-05 (56.3%) than he did in 2005-06 (55.9%) even though his overall FG, 2PT, 3PT, and FT percentages were better in the latter.
-
Rare - few or no known highlights of player/game on RUclips at time of publishing.
All footage is property of the National Basketball Association (NBA). No copyright infringement is intended.
Kobe, especially from 05-07, outside of MJ, was the most RELENTLESSLY great scorer I've ever seen. Objectively speaking though, he took A LOT of tough if not bad shots. Even in this highlight reel, at least 90% of his makes were highly contested, low percentage shots. That's why his FG percentages were always in the 40's. He had so much belief in his ability to make difficult shots, that he would continue to take them (although with who he had around him after Shaq and before Pau, he almost had no other choice many times). Kobe was like the Brett Farve of the NBA. They both were great enough and able enough and did showcase the ability to beat you in a textbook right way, making the right decisions, not forcing the issue and playing within the offense, but at heart, they were "gunslingers" always more than willing to engage in a good ole fashion "shoot out". They were more Tony Montana than Jason Bourne. That was what made them so polarizing and frustrating, and yet so historically great and beloved.
Almost every perimeter scorers % is in the 40s ... unless you are a pf or center being in the mid to high 40s like he was is fantastic. Nobody on this team could score LIKE that. No floor spacing so of course he was taking contested shots
This is the season he debuted the zoom Kobe 1's and said he innovated his game just like his shoe, the mamba was literally unguardable this season
Good analogy
I just like how you got to make sure you put Jordan above Kobe, Kobe was more skilled than jordan, there's a lot of NBA players that say it too, it's a shame I always got to bring Jordan up
@@hashmoncrief6965 If you compare prime MJ to prime Kobe, yes Kobe was at least slightly more skilled, BUT MJ was quicker, more athletically gifted (though Kobe was supremely gifted athletically in his prime) better shot selection and was slightly more tenacious defensively. Plus, much of Kobe's game was undeniably influenced by Michael's.
I love last 2-3 years of number 8 Kobe. He was class scorer.
Kobe during that stretch was peak skill and athleticism. One of the best ever. His preparation and mind for the game was amazing.
Especially 2003 Kobe !!!!
The last years?
So u didn't see what he did in that 3PEAT PLAYOFFS between 00-02 when he led The Lakers to The Finals and absolutely DOMINATED and crushed the grueling though Western Conference teams?
Bec that's basketball u haven't seen in ur life EVER!
Even more rare Kobe games I see. Guess I'll watch even more.
Love the missed shots as well, it brings me back to the moment like I’m there all over again.👍🏾🙏🏾
If Kobe had a championship caliber team that year, he might have six championships, three finals MVPs, and two regular season MVPs. but I wouldn't trade the reality of the 2005-2006 season that Kobe gave us. The 81 point game, the 62 in three quarters, the almost upset of the Suns in the Playoffs, the dunk on Nash in game 2 against the Suns, the game winner in game 4 against the Suns. The 9 game 40 point streak and the 40 point average in January (February too, I think. Correct me if i am wrong). A season for the history books that is more memorable than a second regular season MVP campaign can give.
I feel you man. Tough with that supporting cast building up from the 2004 demolition. The 9 straight 40+ was actually in February of 2002-03, the first of his 4 months averaging 40+. He did average 43.4 in January ‘06 tho which included a stretch of 4 straight 45+ pt games. The other 2 months averaging 40+ were in apr 06 and march 07. Theres only 4 players ever to log 40+ ppg in a month. Baylor, chamberlain, kobe, harden. When Kobe did it in ‘03 he became the first to do it since wilt in 1964.
MVP’s can be extremely misleading. Theres no question the media had disdain for Kobe. The mere fact the Nash has 2 mvp’s, and Kobe and Shaq have only 1 a piece invalidates the award’s legitimacy right there. Its often a popularity contest. There are a handful of mvp’s theyve gotten wrong in my personal opinion. 2005-06 was one of them.
Any other player besides Kobe does the 81, 62 in 3, 43.4 in a month, 40+ pts in 27 games, 4 straight 45+ and 35.4 overall on 45-35-85 while dragging a load of role playing underachievers to 45-37, they win MVP.
And just because he didn’t win the award doesn’t mean he wasn’t the most valuable. Baseball has fixed this with WAR. Used to be “best player on best team” approach. Now with a statistic that represents a player’s true value, doesn’t matter if you finish last in your division or first. 2 of trout’s 3 mvp’s the Angels finished below .500 and missed the postseason. Baseball no longer holds the team’s lack of success against the individual.
@@dcshow Shaq and Kobe only having one MVP each is one of the greatest travesties in NBA History. The haters knock on Kobe for winning only one MVP but that is too simplistic and shallow of a way of looking at things. As you said, the regular-season MVP award has been reduced to a narrative-based popularity contest by the media. One thing is true is that Kobe's '05-'06 season masterpiece is greater than any generic MVP season.
Agreed, well said. People forget too they almost gave nash a 3rd mvp in 07 but dirk edged him out by a narrow margin in the total voting points.
Nash did alot fle the suns but he should not have beat Kobe for mvp twice no way
His pull up jumper was insane
What about his dribble drive or shuffle feet pull up shot or turnaround fadeaway.
It was so many killers plays he had in his Arsenal. Absolutely poetry emotion.
Good video. Its cool that you include the misses, so I can understand better how Kobe was playing that game. Thx for uploading this videos 🙏
Keep this Kobe games coming 👌🏽🐐
Another gem
I love how you show his misses as well. Don't think I've seen any other account do that.
Waiting on these drops🔥
Yo Dom I know a lot of people don’t appreciate this shit you do
But man Thanks so so much on behalf of we Kobe fans
You’re literally helping keep this man’s legacy alive
Also keep posting all field goal attempts
Thanks 🙏🏽 ❤
Your thumbnail style is nice tbh
Thanks so much 🙏
I second that
Straight Killa! #MambaForever
Yes, unstoppable
Kobe with leggings is deadly 💀 ☠️ 🐍🖤
LeBron, Vince, (maybe)Dwyane, and A.I. were wearing them too. Until David Stern(R.I.P.) did away with them the next season up until the 2012-13 season.
Great upload and analysis as usual! On a separate note, do you think you can find any Kobe games where he wore the Blue throwbacks the Lakers are gonna bring back this season? I've seen several pictures of him in the unis (especially in a game at Golden State), but I've only seen one of the games on YT.
They wore them in 03-04 right?
@@dcshow yes, 03-04
7:23 JT was lovin it
JT blows. 👎
Dom Carter u the 🐐
🙏
I used to love those Denver jerseys🎽. The fabric made em shimmer in the light. And the pre-2010 Miami Heat all red jerseys. What was that fabric called 🤔?
Believe your referring to the silk jerseys. Nuggets, heat, 76ers, warriors, few other teams in the 2000’s rocked them. When adidas implemented their “revolution 30” heading into 2010-11 every team officially wore the same fabric.
@@dcshow
Yes bro i recognized those changes in 10-11 season. Ugly af!!
Polyester lol same shit alot of basketball shorts are made of
@@joshromero-burgan9860
Hurdd. Them shits was silky smoov
Hey bro I'm a big fan but is it a reason you show misses.I think that's cool on rare occasions but I don't think people want to see misses on every highlight & I know I might be wrong but that's just my opinion fam!Keep up the great work!
There are many reasons. think its important to show misses as they are part of the subject’s individual performance. They add context. There is value in misses this way, especially a year like Kobe ‘06 where his shot creating ability was on full display. I received great feedback when I first implemented on “Kobe 37 points vs clippers 2004-05” upload a few weeks back. I also explained it a bit more in the description of that video. I hope this clears things up a bit. Thank you for the support.
To add to the other comments, it also gives you an explanation of Kobe's "bad efficiency" as it is called by some since it shows that in most occasions Kobe's shots were under pressure or extreme marking especially in season like this where his 3rd best teammate was Mihm..And of course it was Kobe's decision to take such shots but the truth is most of the times those kind of shots were the better option.
Plus,many of his missed "bad" shots would be called fouls immediately today.In this game f.e. he would have had at least 45 points due to free throws if he had the same treatment of scoring superstars today like Harden.He had many contested shots where the defender was in total contact with him.
But of course I get why some people would not like very much this kind of highlights and I would agree that at some games where Kobe shot badly from the field it could be avoided.
Too bad Smush ended up resenting Kobe so much they had some decent chemistry on court.
First day of camp smush tried to meet him and Kobe said " you cant talk to me you ain't got the accolades yet " lol can ya blame him kobe was a savage
@@joshromero-burgan9860 lol 🤣
"Kobe Bryant Torches Carmelo’s Nuggets..." HAHHAHAHA. Yes, I'm a child.
Anybody know the song playing in the background at the 5:06 mark ?
Hey dom do you know what Kobes baseline fadeaway fg% is? Somebody trying to tell me it's 30%, lol!
Im not even sure how one could accurately gather that kind of data on a specific type of shot in a specific area of the floor. Bballreference has the general type and distance but nothing much beyond that.
@@dcshow What would you say his baseline fade % was? Seemed automatic to me most of the time.
From 2001-11 he shot 44.6% from 10-16 feet. 2006-11 he was at 47.3%. How he operated, the bulk of his looks from this distance were contested with a natural fade in his shot, scratch a few percentage points for difficulty of his typical baseline fades, whether pull up, stepback, post turn etc., and my guess would be somewhere from 40-43%. His numbers fluctuated greatly year to year tho. In 2004-05 for instance 12% of his fga’s were from 10-16 feet, shooting 36% on such looks. In 2009-10 however, it was up to 22% on 48%.
@@dcshow All of his shots were difficult it just seemed like that shot was his bread and butter.
@@dcshow
Great stuff man.
Imagine if Kobe just was a spot up shooter and got the ball on open shots then he be way up in the 50% bec then it be just straight up shooting.
He had a counter for every move.
We so blessed.