New Stefan?! This is like being free from lockdown and quarantine! LIKE LIKE LIKE! Thanks for the pick me up sir! We always get a little pep when you post something new.
@@RUclipsforcedmetochangemyname in order to see the comments, you have to find and hit the comment line that is sometimes a random persons comment or sometimes a blank line for you to start typing. Instead of seeing all of the comments directly under the video, there are now related videos underneath from other content creators. I'm use to almost immediately opening the vid description or scrolling down to see comments and I find myself constantly tapping on someone else's video. Just an annoying change.
Even without a face mill, I'm still impressed. I don't comment often here, but know that I jump on each of your new videos immediately. Always enjoyable. Thank you for sharing what you do.
When running delrin in a small lathe I used to like to get the material come off in a long stream that went straight into the waste receptacle. Made clean up easier 😁
@@StefanGotteswinter Most times the cuts were only about 20 or 30mm long. Small number of parts. Or one of's. Special tools mostly. The small lathes we had were Hardinge HLV-Hs. 3 of them (early 60s) had the electrical cabinet mounted high on the back side. The chip pans were a real PITA to clean out. The 2 newer ones (74) had them mounted down low for easy access. I'd love to have one but used good ones go for stupid money in the US. As bad as Monarch 10-EE's. www.ebay.com/itm/1976-METRIC-HARDINGE-HLV-H-SUPER-PRECISION-TOOL-ROOM-LATHE-HLVH-HLV-FEELER-SHARP/303549692404?hash=item46acf8b9f4:g:sE8AAOSwj19eo1fL Even worn out ones (generally abused) ones get 4 or 5k www.ebay.com/itm/1977-HARDINGE-HLV-H-SUPER-PRECISION-LATHE-ANILAM-DRO-HLVH-HLV-FEELER/293556132346?hash=item44594f19fa:g:BbcAAOSwqXRc1I-k Parts on FleeBay aren't cheap either. I have no idea just what an equivilant German or Swiss lathe goes for but these are extremely nice lathes.
That's no doubt a result of his inability to air quench with sufficient haste. But it vindicates his choice to make them concentric, and accurate. I was thinking why not make them slightly eccentric to enable a sort of "Set-Tru" adjustability, but on reflection that would be a pain to adjust, and also would remove the ability to simply rotate the damaged portion out of the working zone. I love circular carbide inserts for that same virtue. Plus with no corners, they're tough as.
Nice job Stefan, enjoyed. I initially wondered why you had sheet metal covers on the vice. When you had to remove the rear one to use the stop I saw why. Those big socket head screws collect the chips really well! On the plus side is you get a nice notepad for your dimensions :)
If you cut some grooves in the inside of those gripper holders you can use them as normal outside jaws to grip a part for an op-0 where you turn the saw-cut end of a blank flat before reversing it and holding it in the grippers.
Buddy you are spot on and a good instructor/ teacher !! Nice tutorial . Looks like you have some good quality tools to work with as well. Cheers bud !!
Dang it! I wanted to go to bed and now I have to stay awake for another 38 minutes. But what can I do - Stefans Videos have to be watched right away 😁🤗
Didn't seem like 38 min but upon further inspection it most defiantly is I will chalk that up as a sign of a good RUclips make interesting videos that don't seem long at all
A very useful video. The chuck on mt lathe is the type with 2 sets of hardened jaws, inside and outside. It is getting time to but a new chuck with reversible jaws. Here in the USA torque was measured at a distance in feet times a weight in pounds tangent to the device to be measured torque was in ft lbs. Some where in the 1980's some one in the USA reversed the equation which then became lb ft which of course is the same. A newton if I remember correctly is a kilogram x 9.8 m/s2 applied at the distance of 1 meter equals 1 nm. If you weigh your kilogram with a scale on earth you already have the 9.8 term ( acceleration due to gravity) . If you where tightening your bolts in outer space you would need a clicker type torque wrench.
@9:23 what did you mean by "3 flute carbide endmill 2 fluter running at....rpm"? Was this just a miss speak? Not calling you out. I just learn so much here and that has me confused. I am but an amateur...
Cool. I've seen these commercially made from Mitee-bite, but very cool that you made them from scratch. I think we will see a lot of these on YT and IG now
Stefan, why are you using the 30 position tool post for this project? To allow you to use a collet holder for the end mill? Why not use a 40 position style tool post for more of your projects? Cheers, Will
Thank You Stefan...I always enjoy all of your videos and I each time I think when you are using your mill, lathe what ever you always have certain comments about the flaws, backlash. We all have disputes when using our machinery. What I always think is "how would Stefan Gotteswinter design his perfect mill or lathe if you had control over the entire design".
Stefan, thank you for this educational video. I'll have to try this some day. Also, LBF-FT means "pound-force foot" (or "Pound-Foot" when used for torque) for an imperial equivalent to N-m.
what would you say is the best oil hardening tool steel for the home shop. a do all , stable and some what predictable tool steel that one can oil quinch with simple tools. temprature by couler....... we have a suplier of bohler oberhom in town so happy to hear.
Good stuff man. I have used the method popularized by Peter Stanton since before I'd heard of him, and it works great for CNC situations. That method is overkill for your tiny lathe.. but the versa grip idea is perfect. I've made my own almost identical to yours, but find that the actual Mitee Bite versa grips still work better... even though I've used the hell out of mine. Regardless... as always, good job.
Great idea and well executed. I am thinking you could make some indexable hex inserts which could be machined to different radii. Sort of like a set of pre-machined soft jaws.
Hi Stefan, Peter at Edge precision uses a kind of circular dovetail on very heavy steel and exotic parts. Perhaps if you were to want to hold heavier parts, machining the profile of the jaw into the part as a starting point, would allow for much heavier work if needed. Thanks for sharing.
Hey Stefan great video. Just a little FYI about working with pre-ground steel. Every piece I've ever worked (A2,D2,S7) has NOT been ground square from the supplier! This has caused me some grief when trying to grind a piece I made down to finish dimensions. Just saying guys check that pre-ground steel for squareness before you start working with it!
You gave me alot to think about with this setup. I think that I might make some soft jaws for the mill vise, you could switch the grippers from the lathe to the mill vice. I took a quick look at the Mitee--bite website, they sure have expanded their product line. My catalog is from 2000.
That dovetail workholding looks like it will work well for threading away from the chuck. The workpiece can't "walk out", which is my only real concern there.
Would it be a bad idea to cut a small slot on the jaws faces, right in front of the dove tail crimping area, where the material deforms towards the direction to the chuck? or would that translate into less gripping force, as the material in now allowed to be squished easily out of the way, towards the chuck?... Clever system, like you stated, this opens up a large amount of clamping processes ,by means of just changing out inserts
Stefan! What's going on at 4:14? TOT tricks? Is he in your shop finally? I bet TOT is using his lathe to time travel and avoid social distancing requirements... Does your lathe do a time machine too? :) Nice video! It is very motivating indeed and I will probably attempt to recreate the same. Thank you for talking about materials used, it is very helpful. Danke Stefan!
Hmm, if you had ground the grippers with the sharp angles, and a small radius, you’d end up with 3-6 points you could use, without having to produce 3 extra parts + bolts/thread? I guess I’m saying I’m curious of the purpose of the roller style gripper?
THERE IS ALWAYS SOME THING NEW AND IT IS WONDERFUL. I HAVE A EMCO VP10 FOUR JAW SINGLE SCROLL CHUCK, WOULD YOU HAVE ANY IDEA OF WHERE I COULD PURCHASE A SET OF JAWS THAT YOU USED FOR YOUR THREE JAW.
Stefan, Nice video and interesting method for clamping soft materials. I noticed two things: 1: New QCTP on your lathe, instead of Tripan tool holder 2: New clamping screw on your milling machine with a price range of 400 to 600 euros. What is the discredit and reason for renewal of the old compared to the new? Vriendelijke groeten,
Stefan, I recall you having used a specialized epoxy to permanently tram and strengthen the mill's column to base connection. Still, I've heard you occasionally mention the inherent lack of rigidity in these type of bench mills, but you always have a process work-around to compensate and your work is always impressive. Would welding up an overbuilt stand with some sort of integrated triagulated strongback for the column be worth the effort or is it better just to live within the limitations and call it a day? I ask as I am considering purchasing a similar heavy duty Chinese bench mill and would be building a stand anyway. Thanks for all your fine machining content and the very welcome relief from lockdown boredom.
One of the many, many faults of the Imperial system is that the word "pound" is ambiguous. A pound may be a unit of mass or it may be a unit of force. You cannot tell which without some disambiguation so careful writers distinguish between pound-mass (lbm) and pound-force (lbf). A mass of one lbm subjected to an acceleration of one foot/sec**2 requires one *poundal* of force since even the Imperial system cannot disregard F=ma. Contrariwise if you use lbf as a primary unit, then you must express mass in *slugs*. I wish I were making this up but I am not. I have used both lbf-based and lbm systems and it is annoying to say the least. I learned this in engineering school and also learned that most people do not understand the difference between mass and force, since we inhabit a planet where the gravitational acceleration is mostly constant.
E Designs I like the primary and secondary jaws in Gerardi vise but I’m unsure of its operation. I can see the secondary jaw move downwards as compression starts. If compression continue increasing will it reach a lower limit? If not, why? If it does it will be no better or worse than Kurt vise.
Is the tapper made of copper or brass? If it's copper: would regular brass also be okay or is it to hard? Wanna make one and I have a piece of brass here...
G’day Stefan, excellent jaws, little scrap stock but what is the smallest stock you can hold? Why not mount the jaws at the inner tip say 3.mm in for a land. Cheers Peter
At 10 NM/8 FtLb on the pinion I know you have to actually be putting much more force with the jaw. The scroll in the chuck can be thought of an inclined plane that wedges the jaw
😀 I'm impressed! Another very impressive video! Those grippers surely do make quite an impression in the part, verifying a good grab! You've impressed me since I first found your u-toobe channel, years ago! 😉
Stefan,those jaws are a great plus for saving on waste material stock. That is a very secure grip indeed👍 lb-ft? My torque wrench is even more confusing,it has kg/mtrs on the sleeve. I can't imagine whatever they are 😂. They sound like they could be 10 times harder to interpret than Newton mtrs.
First off, lbf ft. Is pounds force feet, imperial torque. Second, how do you clean off the gripped end if you haven’t a convenient threaded hole at the other end to use as a mount. Regards
By the way, did I missed the footage showing we (indicator) verify the jaw-shoulder height and jaw-head height in Z direction are square from jaw to jaw ?
I was wondering about that also. This is an idea application for a tool post grinder. It would have provided a great finish and insured that all the jaws are the same height.
Sorry, this may be a stupid question, but I've never used a mill before, and I don't understand the difference between climb milling and conventional milling. Is it to do with the relative speeds of the cutting edge and the material? By my quick calcs, the cutting face of a 3mm mill running at 1000 rpm will contact the material at a rate of approximately 150mm/s. Your table is moving at no more than, say, 10mm/s, so in this worst case scenario, there is a 28% difference between the two. Is this difference what people are assessing, or us there another, more fundamental distinction between the two?
Climb milling the cutter due to its rotation pulls the material ( not good if you have backlash in your machine) Conventional milling the cutters rotation pushes the material away.
Excellent Stefan! Thanks for the shoutout. Love how awesome your lathe is setup now.
ATB, Robin
Thanks Robin! You where a great inspiration in showing your setup with the solid toolpost, preset tools, waycovers, etc.. :-)
New Stefan?! This is like being free from lockdown and quarantine!
LIKE LIKE LIKE!
Thanks for the pick me up sir! We always get a little pep when you post something new.
Btw, does anyone else hate the new YT comment system? Been driving me crazy.
@@shirothehero0609 it hasn't changed on mobile what is different
@@RUclipsforcedmetochangemyname You are really Wacko:):):)
@@RUclipsforcedmetochangemyname in order to see the comments, you have to find and hit the comment line that is sometimes a random persons comment or sometimes a blank line for you to start typing. Instead of seeing all of the comments directly under the video, there are now related videos underneath from other content creators. I'm use to almost immediately opening the vid description or scrolling down to see comments and I find myself constantly tapping on someone else's video. Just an annoying change.
Yap, nothing like a good pep up these days down in my bunker.😁👍
Even without a face mill, I'm still impressed. I don't comment often here, but know that I jump on each of your new videos immediately. Always enjoyable. Thank you for sharing what you do.
Making parts AND impressing people. Well done Sir! As always.
10:00 So precise that the chips just pile themselves up neatly.
When running delrin in a small lathe I used to like to get the material come off in a long stream that went straight into the waste receptacle. Made clean up easier 😁
Until the chip catches and the whole content of the trashcan goes back towards the lathe :D
@@StefanGotteswinter
Most times the cuts were only about 20 or 30mm long. Small number of parts. Or one of's. Special tools mostly. The small lathes we had were Hardinge HLV-Hs. 3 of them (early 60s) had the electrical cabinet mounted high on the back side. The chip pans were a real PITA to clean out. The 2 newer ones (74) had them mounted down low for easy access. I'd love to have one but used good ones go for stupid money in the US. As bad as Monarch 10-EE's.
www.ebay.com/itm/1976-METRIC-HARDINGE-HLV-H-SUPER-PRECISION-TOOL-ROOM-LATHE-HLVH-HLV-FEELER-SHARP/303549692404?hash=item46acf8b9f4:g:sE8AAOSwj19eo1fL
Even worn out ones (generally abused) ones get 4 or 5k
www.ebay.com/itm/1977-HARDINGE-HLV-H-SUPER-PRECISION-LATHE-ANILAM-DRO-HLVH-HLV-FEELER/293556132346?hash=item44594f19fa:g:BbcAAOSwqXRc1I-k
Parts on FleeBay aren't cheap either. I have no idea just what an equivilant German or Swiss lathe goes for but these are extremely nice lathes.
I like your SNC (Stefan Numerical Control) programming demonstration on the mill!
I work at the SSAB Oxelösund where ToolOx is made, Have flame/Plasma cut our materials for years now
Ohh the fit of the gripper inserts in that bore is so satisfying. Ill never get tired of your commitment to above excellent fit and finish Stefan
28:15 You can already see the first flat spot on the gripper insert. Good thing you made them simple and replaceable
That's no doubt a result of his inability to air quench with sufficient haste. But it vindicates his choice to make them concentric, and accurate. I was thinking why not make them slightly eccentric to enable a sort of "Set-Tru" adjustability, but on reflection that would be a pain to adjust, and also would remove the ability to simply rotate the damaged portion out of the working zone. I love circular carbide inserts for that same virtue. Plus with no corners, they're tough as.
I made already new ones out of O2 toolsteel, which I can harden way more reliable and repeatable ;-)
@@Gottenhimfella Making them excentric is a cool idea, but I think I can go without, as they are only used to hold raw stock
Nice work. Reminds me of cat paw (diamond pattern) grippers on large production broaches, to grab rough castings. Great detail as always. Thanks.
I am a simple man, I see a Stefan Gotteswinter video; I smash the like button.
Youre always one of the first, haha
Very nice setup, I really like it. Thank you for sharing.
Wait, when did he switch to a Multi Fix tool holder? And the milling vice was new to me.....
Very much enjoy the idea that You Tubers share ideas and transfer to all of us the wisdom. thx
I like your table and vice covers. It's a good idea and I'm going to do the same. My mill is a mess when I'm done with it.
Stefan. The Dove Tail hold down system works on the milling table to .Amazeig how strong this system is .👍😎
The production of your videos just keeps getting better and better. Thanks for the quality content.
Nice job Stefan, enjoyed. I initially wondered why you had sheet metal covers on the vice. When you had to remove the rear one to use the stop I saw why. Those big socket head screws collect the chips really well! On the plus side is you get a nice notepad for your dimensions :)
If you cut some grooves in the inside of those gripper holders you can use them as normal outside jaws to grip a part for an op-0 where you turn the saw-cut end of a blank flat before reversing it and holding it in the grippers.
By gripper holders, I presume you mean the top jaws (which bolt to the ex-factory master jaws)?
Good idea.
Buddy you are spot on and a good instructor/ teacher !! Nice tutorial . Looks like you have some good quality tools to work with as well. Cheers bud !!
Really nice design. I suppose you could use the same jaws to hold a part from the ID as well
definetly!
I really enjoy seeing your techniques, those subtleties are very useful, thank you for the great video.
As always, bloody brilliant. Thanks for taking the time to explain and show in detail.
I am in awe of your ability Stefan..........great video, thank you for sharing!!
Dang it! I wanted to go to bed and now I have to stay awake for another 38 minutes. But what can I do - Stefans Videos have to be watched right away 😁🤗
Didn't seem like 38 min but upon further inspection it most defiantly is I will chalk that up as a sign of a good RUclips make interesting videos that don't seem long at all
A very useful video. The chuck on mt lathe is the type with 2 sets of hardened jaws, inside and outside. It is getting time to but a new chuck with reversible jaws. Here in the USA torque was measured at a distance in feet times a weight in pounds tangent to the device to be measured torque was in ft lbs. Some where in the 1980's some one in the USA reversed the equation which then became lb ft which of course is the same. A newton if I remember correctly is a kilogram x 9.8 m/s2 applied at the distance of 1 meter equals 1 nm. If you weigh your kilogram with a scale on earth you already have the 9.8 term ( acceleration due to gravity) . If you where tightening your bolts in outer space you would need a clicker type torque wrench.
@9:23 what did you mean by "3 flute carbide endmill 2 fluter running at....rpm"?
Was this just a miss speak? Not calling you out. I just learn so much here and that has me confused. I am but an amateur...
That was definitely a miss speak, it looks and sounds like a 2 flute so it may be a 3mm diameter?
Miss speaked - 3mm 2 flute running at 3000rpm ;)
"I don't need to impress somebody I just have to make parts" ❤
That was a great idea Stefan! Love the design!
Cool. I've seen these commercially made from Mitee-bite, but very cool that you made them from scratch. I think we will see a lot of these on YT and IG now
Stefan, why are you using the 30 position tool post for this project? To allow you to use a collet holder for the end mill? Why not use a 40 position style tool post for more of your projects? Cheers, Will
You just solved this morning’s work holding problem ... finished lunch back to the shop
Bravo Stefan, bravo!
Thank you!
Thank You Stefan...I always enjoy all of your videos and I each time I think when you are using your mill, lathe what ever you always have certain comments about the flaws, backlash. We all have disputes when using our machinery. What I always think is "how would Stefan Gotteswinter design his perfect mill or lathe if you had control over the entire design".
Well done as always Stefan.
You always seem to amaze me with what you can do on a small lathe thanks for what you do it inspire’s me to do more
Thank you Sir Stefan
The best explained milling video I have watched.
A New Subscriber..
Thank you!
Glad to see you're still in your kirk doing the werk.
Stefan, thank you for this educational video. I'll have to try this some day. Also, LBF-FT means "pound-force foot" (or "Pound-Foot" when used for torque) for an imperial equivalent to N-m.
Always a pleasure to see another video from you!
I need to copy your vise stock stop :) Those gripper jaws are brilliant!
what would you say is the best oil hardening tool steel for the home shop. a do all , stable and some what predictable tool steel that one can oil quinch with simple tools. temprature by couler....... we have a suplier of bohler oberhom in town so happy to hear.
Well I'm impressed, great job man.
Good stuff man. I have used the method popularized by Peter Stanton since before I'd heard of him, and it works great for CNC situations. That method is overkill for your tiny lathe.. but the versa grip idea is perfect. I've made my own almost identical to yours, but find that the actual Mitee Bite versa grips still work better... even though I've used the hell out of mine. Regardless... as always, good job.
Very cool solution, Stefan! Thanks for sharing!
Great idea and well executed. I am thinking you could make some indexable hex inserts which could be machined to different radii. Sort of like a set of pre-machined soft jaws.
Good idea. John Stevenson did this exact thing, a while back.
Hi Stefan, Peter at Edge precision uses a kind of circular dovetail on very heavy steel and exotic parts. Perhaps if you were to want to hold heavier parts, machining the profile of the jaw into the part as a starting point, would allow for much heavier work if needed. Thanks for sharing.
Next time I will watch until the end before commenting :)
Stefan great video as always. Great solution in the mechanical arts.
Impressive chuck jaws. Thanks for the videos.
You are getting funnier with age. Like a proper machinist.
Hey Stefan great video. Just a little FYI about working with pre-ground steel. Every piece I've ever worked (A2,D2,S7) has NOT been ground square from the supplier! This has caused me some grief when trying to grind a piece I made down to finish dimensions. Just saying guys check that pre-ground steel for squareness before you start working with it!
You gave me alot to think about with this setup. I think that I might make some soft jaws for the mill vise, you could switch the grippers from the lathe to the mill vice. I took a quick look at the Mitee--bite website, they sure have expanded their product line. My catalog is from 2000.
Nice job Stefan! I like your vise stop for the mill.
That dovetail workholding looks like it will work well for threading away from the chuck. The workpiece can't "walk out", which is my only real concern there.
Would it be a bad idea to cut a small slot on the jaws faces, right in front of the dove tail crimping area, where the material deforms towards the direction to the chuck? or would that translate into less gripping force, as the material in now allowed to be squished easily out of the way, towards the chuck?... Clever system, like you stated, this opens up a large amount of clamping processes ,by means of just changing out inserts
This is like my Miti-Mite jaws for the Kurt style mill vise. I wonder if Robert was inspired by those. They’re pretty well known.
Hello Stefan, very well done interesting chuck modification.
Great idea for holding your work piece Stefan.
An excellent technique - great idea. Thanks Stefan.
Whether you use a face mill or not you are a pretty impressive machinist. Keep making parts though!
I think I missed how you cleaned up the back end of the Delrin part once unclamped. How do you hold the part? Great video
I was also hoping to see this.
Hi Stefan, thanks for the videos. It's always a pleasure to watch them. What is your QCTP, please?
It's either a Swiss Multifix or a clone thereof.
www.lathes.co.uk/multifix/
I always look forward to your videos. Thanks for making them 👍👍
Nice work! 👍
Thank you!
Mighty bites for the lathe!
Stefan! What's going on at 4:14? TOT tricks? Is he in your shop finally? I bet TOT is using his lathe to time travel and avoid social distancing requirements... Does your lathe do a time machine too? :)
Nice video! It is very motivating indeed and I will probably attempt to recreate the same. Thank you for talking about materials used, it is very helpful. Danke Stefan!
Thank you Stefan i enjoyed your video its pretty easy to envy your work
Keep up the great work
Hmm, if you had ground the grippers with the sharp angles, and a small radius, you’d end up with 3-6 points you could use, without having to produce 3 extra parts + bolts/thread?
I guess I’m saying I’m curious of the purpose of the roller style gripper?
THERE IS ALWAYS SOME THING NEW AND IT IS WONDERFUL. I HAVE A EMCO VP10 FOUR JAW SINGLE SCROLL CHUCK, WOULD YOU HAVE ANY IDEA OF WHERE I COULD PURCHASE A SET OF JAWS THAT YOU USED FOR YOUR THREE JAW.
Stefan,
Nice video and interesting method for clamping soft materials. I noticed two things:
1: New QCTP on your lathe, instead of Tripan tool holder
2: New clamping screw on your milling machine with a price range of 400 to 600 euros. What is the discredit and reason for renewal of the old compared to the new?
Vriendelijke groeten,
Stefan, I recall you having used a specialized epoxy to permanently tram and strengthen the mill's column to base connection. Still, I've heard you occasionally mention the inherent lack of rigidity in these type of bench mills, but you always have a process work-around to compensate and your work is always impressive. Would welding up an overbuilt stand with some sort of integrated triagulated strongback for the column be worth the effort or is it better just to live within the limitations and call it a day? I ask as I am considering purchasing a similar heavy duty Chinese bench mill and would be building a stand anyway. Thanks for all your fine machining content and the very welcome relief from lockdown boredom.
Really nice. Great idea! Thank you for sharing.
👏🏼🇩🇪standing up for the metric system since the 80s (lbsft whatever that is 😂)
This is a o
D wood tuner trick.learned it in highschool.
"Rought to 17.000 mm"
i was thinking the same thing. measuring your rough dimension with a 0.001 resolution micrometer.
than bring down to 16,000000 :)
"8 lbf... ft... whatever that is"
Yes right, we don't need measurements in bathtubs per footballfield.
Bratwurst per second! :D
Bratwurst per secund second sounds SI complient unit for a german speaker XD
@@lukahutinski9075 Hotdog per wink for Imperial Measurements
One of the many, many faults of the Imperial system is that the word "pound" is ambiguous. A pound may be a unit of mass or it may be a unit of force. You cannot tell which without some disambiguation so careful writers distinguish between pound-mass (lbm) and pound-force (lbf). A mass of one lbm subjected to an acceleration of one foot/sec**2 requires one *poundal* of force since even the Imperial system cannot disregard F=ma. Contrariwise if you use lbf as a primary unit, then you must express mass in *slugs*. I wish I were making this up but I am not. I have used both lbf-based and lbm systems and it is annoying to say the least. I learned this in engineering school and also learned that most people do not understand the difference between mass and force, since we inhabit a planet where the gravitational acceleration is mostly constant.
@@lukahutinski9075 it is, but it's a unit of energy use, not force applied
Great food for thought, thanks Stefan👍
Nice project. I can’t help but notice your unique vise. Is that your original concept and creation?
I believe that Stefan is using a Gerardi modular vise. While I love Kurt vises, the Gerardi may be even better.
E Designs
I like the primary and secondary jaws in Gerardi vise but I’m unsure of its operation.
I can see the secondary jaw move downwards as compression starts. If compression continue increasing will it reach a lower limit? If not, why? If it does it will be no better or worse than Kurt vise.
Sounds like sped up bagpipes during the machining in the 12:25 x4 chunk
I always learn something from you. Awesome work. Thank you!
Is the tapper made of copper or brass? If it's copper: would regular brass also be okay or is it to hard? Wanna make one and I have a piece of brass here...
Copper seems to work better in my experience.
@@StefanGotteswinter thx, will get some copper then.
G’day Stefan, excellent jaws, little scrap stock but what is the smallest stock you can hold? Why not mount the jaws at the inner tip say 3.mm in for a land.
Cheers
Peter
At 10 NM/8 FtLb on the pinion I know you have to actually be putting much more force with the jaw. The scroll in the chuck can be thought of an inclined plane that wedges the jaw
Thank you very much
Excellent idea, thank you.
Like your vise. By design it forces the jaw down. What make is this vise ?
Great video. Thanks.
😀 I'm impressed!
Another very impressive video!
Those grippers surely do make quite an impression in the part, verifying a good grab!
You've impressed me since I first found your u-toobe channel, years ago! 😉
34:56 g 1/4 -19 tap? I had to look that one up.
Me too! :D
Oooh! A UPA1. And I think I have seen you use a UPA3. Do you have the full set? (I only have 4 and 3)
I have a 1 and 3 :D
I would like a Nr. 2, but they are quite rare.
Stefan,those jaws are a great plus for saving on waste material stock. That is a very secure grip indeed👍
lb-ft? My torque wrench is even more confusing,it has kg/mtrs on the sleeve. I can't imagine whatever they are 😂. They sound like they could be 10 times harder to interpret than Newton mtrs.
First off, lbf ft. Is pounds force feet, imperial torque. Second, how do you clean off the gripped end if you haven’t a convenient threaded hole at the other end to use as a mount. Regards
Abom-size cuts! Nice!
Is that ToolOx 33 available from OxToolCo perhaps?
Thank you, Stefan. My first projects will be in plastic.
great video. amazing as always
By the way, did I missed the footage showing we (indicator) verify the jaw-shoulder height and jaw-head height in Z direction are square from jaw to jaw ?
I was interested in that as well.
I was wondering about that also. This is an idea application for a tool post grinder. It would have provided a great finish and insured that all the jaws are the same height.
Sorry, this may be a stupid question, but I've never used a mill before, and I don't understand the difference between climb milling and conventional milling. Is it to do with the relative speeds of the cutting edge and the material?
By my quick calcs, the cutting face of a 3mm mill running at 1000 rpm will contact the material at a rate of approximately 150mm/s. Your table is moving at no more than, say, 10mm/s, so in this worst case scenario, there is a 28% difference between the two.
Is this difference what people are assessing, or us there another, more fundamental distinction between the two?
Climb milling the cutter due to its rotation pulls the material ( not good if you have backlash in your machine) Conventional milling the cutters rotation pushes the material away.
lol lbf ft whatever that means
I'm not sure if it was pun or if Stefan is disgusted by the non metric system :)
@@1AB09CC3 probably both
Lmao... I caught that too and laughed my ass off.
I figured it was some good old German Humor!
Maybe tired to make conversions