Hey why don’t the same judges say something about that cringe in trumps trial. ?? Are they in agreement with his behavior? Are they willing to do the same thing, silencing the defendant, not allowing crucial defense wittinesses? Of simply allowing the case to continue without merit ?
Heckler's veto is not protected speech. This whole interview missed the point. The guy being interviewed would be one of the heckler types in the audience.
As JUDGES, they need to REMEMBER they are held to different standards and REGULATIONS, as public servants PAID by taxpayer dollars. So, be smart. This is NOT a competition. If they want to compete with these private businesses, then VACATE the bench. It's just reckless conduct to play some political game, when the focus should be on adjudicating cases. It's actions like these that make me lose faith in the JUSTICE system. Private business is one thing. The justice system is ANOTHER.
It was the Avalon Project website where I learned that Congress has surrendered ALL public offices to the U.N. in 1951. That's placed all our public officials under the International Law known as UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE aka The Law Merchant aka Maritime-Admiralty, which includes Pirate laws.
Well, if Yale students don’t believe in the first amendment, the Constitution, why would you want them on your staff?
That was not "unbiased" coverage.
“ unbias “ is a myth and a fallacy within all media .
Ubaised=anything I agree with
Get over yourself media is biased, always was.
Jesus Christ. The constant interrupting by the host was insufferable.
Hey why don’t the same judges say something about that cringe in trumps trial. ?? Are they in agreement with his behavior? Are they willing to do the same thing, silencing the defendant, not allowing crucial defense wittinesses? Of simply allowing the case to continue without merit ?
Heckler's veto is not protected speech. This whole interview missed the point. The guy being interviewed would be one of the heckler types in the audience.
The host is way too hyped. Calm tf down dude.
IT'S ABOUT TIME.
If they're not in support of the Constitution, they're not qualified to be a judge.
Constitution is also subject to interpretation.
@@rickyxia6228 Sure. But you cannot interpret the shall nots for shalls.
,What a great guest.
poo, yale.
As JUDGES, they need to REMEMBER they are held to different standards and REGULATIONS, as public servants PAID by taxpayer dollars. So, be smart. This is NOT a competition. If they want to compete with these private businesses, then VACATE the bench. It's just reckless conduct to play some political game, when the focus should be on adjudicating cases. It's actions like these that make me lose faith in the JUSTICE system. Private business is one thing. The justice system is ANOTHER.
It was the Avalon Project website where I learned that Congress has surrendered ALL public offices to the U.N. in 1951. That's placed all our public officials under the International Law known as UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE aka The Law Merchant aka Maritime-Admiralty, which includes Pirate laws.