Not many people realise the level of innovation Mourinho implemented. He even analysed the grass lengths (which is common practice now) and changed grass length and style of play for each opponent.
Great vid. People called that team boring in the same way some people describe even free-scoring Man City as boring. These teams were so dominant in their eras that the result was almost a certainty when they played.
Love seeing Mourinho’s innovation, I feel like wenger always gets praised for the way he changed the game and rightfully so, what he did was incredible, but people act as if Mourinho never innovated which I find crazy
I love teams with strong defences. Only 15 goals conceded in a season is a crazy stat. Defending is not boring to me. I’m not a Chelsea fan, I support Arsenal but you have to respect Mourinho’s tactics
When Mourinho first started at Chelsea, they played a 4-3-1-2 like his Porto had, with Thiago Mendes and Makelele as both fairly-to-very defensive midfielders, Lampard also pretty deep as a mezzala/box-to-box player, and Aleksey Smertin or Joe Cole as a 10, Duff coming on as a substitute for width. It was when Robben got healthy that this new formation came to be, and then suddenly the team had both real width and were overpowering centrally, the switches between Duff and Robben were completely flummoxing defenders (hi Gary Neville!), fullbacks were flying on the overlap, Lampard was making his now-trademark runs, etc etc. They had been incredibly boring to that point, every game like some terrible Serie A game from the 90s, and then it was like an overnight transformation into a completely different, thrilling team. IF Essien had stayed healthy . . . what could have been (for me, Tiago was the weak link in the team, solid player but too slow physically for the PL and not quite fast enough mentally to compensate, unlike Fabregas in his later Chelsea stint). Also shout out to Steve Clarke, assistant manager. The inverted winger thing was genuinely new at the time.
Superb comment. You can always tell the real fans who watched the Chelsea games at the time vs someone analysing in retrospect. If I recall correctly it was after losing to Man City 1-0 that Mourinho made the switch. We were defensively solid but couldn't create enough chances before then.
This is absolutely brilliant. Thank you so much for starting retro tactics! Woud you consider doing a video on Liverpool's 08/09 team under Benetiz that nearly won the title?
With regard to attacking fullbacks and their genesis in English football. In the 1970s Aston Villa had two forward minded fullbacks in John Gidman (RB) and John Robson (LB) who were often forward of their associated midfielder on their respective wings. Gidman went on to play for Everton and Man Utd in a similar role. I’m pretty sure Bobby Robson did similar at Ipswich with his fullbacks.
Yeah. I don't know what he's on about. When i heard that i immediately thought of Carlos Alberto. Played RB for his entire career and scored 64 times, including a very famous goal in the 1970's world cup final, one of the 20 greatest world cup goals according to fifa
@@eduschafer true. Although I would suggest that Brazil had 10 outfield players at the time who could play almost any position on the pitch.. iirc Carlos Alberto is the first player I remember setting the ball 10 metres outside the post to then curl into the top corner of the goal. Although, at the time, the press put it down to ‘the rarified air of Mexico City’ and/or ‘the poorly designed Adidas ball’. A truly amazing defender who was also a complete footballer.
Thanks for making this video, I was quite young when watching chelsea win everything so didn't know the tactics at play, quite interesting looking at it now.
Conte also deserves a nod on for completely shattering the premier league trend, which Mourinho sparked and mentioned in this video, by playing a redacted version of his patented three at the back system. Loads of managers in the league and beyond would catch on to the benefits of his 3421 which emphasized overloads all over the pitch, including Gareth Southgate for England
Yes! I remember i was initially annoyed at first when other teams _copied_ Conte's implementation of three at the back and spiced it up to their own taste. These other teams gained succes at it, somewhat. But none of them had Kante in their squad. And that's what make Conte's Chelsea special to this day for me.
Love this concept, really interesting! How about some of the really retro formations like: - the 2-3-5 (which has now essentially come back) - Herbert Chapman's W-M - Hungary's 4-2-4 - Sir Alf's 4-4-2
Porto fan here. I remember Gudjohnsen, he was Chelsea's Derlei, a utility, versatile forward that could show up in the box from every position and score.
Most people now adays have no love for the tacticality of the game any longer and are only interested in how many goals were scored. Mourinho's team was 2nd to Arsenal's in goals scored!! 2nd!! Won the most possessions in games, chances created, shots, and was very, very solid all over the pitch. You can't break them down.
not everyone would know, but Mourinho has spent his early years of “coaching” in Barcelona, as a translator - so of course, he’s also a student of the positional play philosophy, and i wouldn’t be surprised to learn that it was a game changer for PL
Positional play is not unique to Barca, in fact Milan under Sacchi did it better. Mourinho was a student of the game, and Barcelona was just a step for him. Infact the Benfica team where he started as a translator was where full back position was revolutionized for a long time
*Jose not hose. Portuguese not Spanish. Some of these things you could just as easily credit Wenger for. That 4-4-2 was more of a 4-3-3, Henry was as much a winger (an inverted one) as a striker and try telling me with a straight face that our fullbacks of the era didn't contribute going forward. Jose had a much more balanced and complete squad for that end and seemed far more deliberate in this approach but he certainly wasn't the originator nor a revolutionary on his own.
Great Video❤ I'd like videos either on why the first Galacticos "failed" or on Ole Gunnar Solskjaer's runners-up season OR... how Spain fell off after 2012 Euros
7:10 is incorrect. Mourinho's full-backs were notoriously defensive. He had spotted how Bridge and Glen Johnson had almost played as wing backs in 03-04 and left huge gaps, which plus a fairly high-line, left them vulnerable to the counter-attack. Hence the signing of Paulo Ferreira replacing Johnson, and eventually the replacement of Bridge with Gallas.
More, please. And could you do Retro-Tactics comparing teams promoted from Tier Two to Tier One in the 90s/00s compared to Luton / Burnley / Sheffield United of 24 to answer a question as to where the problems for promoted teams are. For context, I watched Bradford City's two Premier League campaigns and while in some games they were just battered, in others two 442s went up against each other and the one which ran more won.
This is excellent. It’s a very niche shout, but Walter Smith’s Treble Winning Rangers 92/93 came within a game of the CL final and were unbeaten in Europe that season. This is with the 3 foreigner rule, and usually 2 Englishmen as 2/3 of them. They played a 442, with the best big man and poacher partnership I’ve ever seen, McCoist and Hateley. Such a tremendous team, cruelly pipped by a dodgy Marseille.
Crazy how that 2004/5 team was one goal (dodgy pen tbh) away from going undefeated the year after the Invincibles did it. Would have been a better record too. 29 wins, 8 draws, 1 loss, 95 points.
Great content ! Would love to see one for Wengers 1998 champions - brining about what we see as modern football to england . And also - perhaps a little niche - but would love to see some teams like Potchetino’s nearly men Spurs 2017 , or Holloway’s blackpool 2011 .
My suggestion for retro tactics...how did a small unfashionable club from an East Anglian backwater, Ipswich Town, push the juggernaut that was the Liverpool side of the late 70s and early 80s, so close on so many occasions. On paper it shouldn't have been possible.
No he didn't. He has acknowledged so, that his winger role was not working. Jose simply thought his recovery would work as a great screen. Jose had a similar role in Porto as well
I would love to see an interview with someone like Lampard or Terry and ask what it was like when they were first shown these tactics in training and what they thought of them?
There’s a lot good in this but a lot is a huge rewriting of history. Full backs attacked loads for decades before this, Mourinho innovated a lot, but not everything! I’m not even going to name names because you know which full backs in the 90s ‘virtually did no attacking’? Hardly any of them. And there were lots of ball playing centre halves in England. Albert, Howey, Mark Wright, Hansen, Lawrenson, Bould, Pallister.. Makalele was a slight difference but he wasn’t some world changing shock to everyone. He wasn’t THAT far away from David Batty or Nobby Stiles. This stuff was mostly a slight evolution not a revolution. Inverted wingers I’ll probably agree with.
His name isn't pronounced 'Ho-zay'. He's not Spanish and therefore being Portuguese, the 'J' in Jose is NOT silent and is pronounced in the usual way. Just for future reference Mr Adam.
Max Allegri’s Scudetto Machine Juventus Evolution of AC Milan through Maldini Ancelotti’s 13/14 Real Madrid vs Mourinho’s Real Madrid R9 and Inter Milan Galacticos vs La Masia 18/19 Ajax Champions League winning Ajax Serie A Strikers vs Other Leagues
Newcastle entertainers. But also my girlfriend’s (and her families team) Portsmouth tactics. More per say 2008 FA cup winning team! My girlfriend is from Gosport (near Portsmouth) and I’m a geordie from Newcastle
Kids of today don't know how brilliant that Chelsea team was. One clown just saw the 15 goals conceded and said that team was defensive and no attack, 😅😅 clown, they can't even do research to know if its true or not. Some even don't believe that JT is a ball playing CB as well as being route 1 English defender. Big ups to you Adam and your team.
I think you exagerate certain things, like full backs not attacking before Mourinho or the great british myth of Makelele "inventing" the holding midfielder position , but thanks for the video.
Why is this video 17:33 minutes long? He was given a blank cheque by Abramovich, and applied park the bus tactics when his team took the lead. Didn't work at Tottenham and Roma where he had weaker squads and less money to spend.
What does that even mean? It’s not about “picking” it’s about not knowing how words are pronounced in foreign languages which is fair enough because he’s not a polyglot.
Much of this is very good but the talk about Wayne Bridge being starting LB is nonsense. He only had 15 PL appearances over 2 years in that period. Gallas had 62 - over 4 times as much with many of those coming at LB. Even Del Horno had 25 PL apps in 05-06 alone.
His name is not Hose. He is not a Spaniard. His name is pronounced JOE-se. He is Portuguese and believe it or not, Portuguese people do not speak Spanish.
I really think you're over egging how 'innovative' this Chelsea side was tactically and strategically. Yes 442 of some type was the norm, but over the years there have been all sorts of formations and strategies. And saying full backs weren't supposed to attack back then is crazy talk. This was 2005 for fs sake not 1955. There were full backs known for their attacking play as much as their defending in the 1970s. Certainly by the late 70s/early 80s such as Kenny Sansom, Viv Anderson. Phil Neal etc This is Mourinho worship revisionism.
The best English club side I've ever seen would be worth a deep dive imo. It's the Liverpool of Barnes, Beardsley, Aldridge. That's how people remember them, i prefer to remember Nicol, McMahon, Houghton. Although the whole team was a bit special. Was it just great players or did they do something clever tactically too?
And the new generation continues the thump the media lies and myths it spouts about mourinho. We absolutely dominated the league but the media said we were boring lol. We were making headlines every other day in footballing terms but the media said we played anti football. Screams of an agenda doesn’t it
@@johnp515 He's a professional sports journalist talking about one of the most famous Managers to ever grace the game Getting his name wrong is just embarrassing now. He's been a big name for 20 years now for fucks sake
No other manager that could do what Mourinho did back then, no matter how much money you have. His football intelligence is undeniable, you're truly a fool to put that down to his transfer budget. Is Pep Guardiola not a genius because he has a valuable squad? These managers aren't successful because of money, they get the big money BECAUSE they are successful. They have high value squads because they are the best people on the planet to make the most of that money.
simple; by Cheating. I understand this is a channel about tactics but not calling out recognized cheaters is one of the big reasons football has recognized cheaters still playing. Chelsea, City, PSG, Juventus- scum. nothing more but a stain on the game.
Man United, liverpool, Arsenal. Every club has bent or broken the rules. You’re just naming the clubs who have had modern investments and a club from serie A. You could name half the clubs in Serie A for cheating of some sorts.
Not many people realise the level of innovation Mourinho implemented. He even analysed the grass lengths (which is common practice now) and changed grass length and style of play for each opponent.
The fact that a magazine has a youtube channel that seems this genuine blows my mind.
Retro tactics is perfect, no need to change
Eidur Gudjohbsen and Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink are two of the most underrated players in Chelsea history
I'd LOVE to see this for Conte's Chelsea. This was really well done.
Great vid. People called that team boring in the same way some people describe even free-scoring Man City as boring. These teams were so dominant in their eras that the result was almost a certainty when they played.
Love seeing Mourinho’s innovation, I feel like wenger always gets praised for the way he changed the game and rightfully so, what he did was incredible, but people act as if Mourinho never innovated which I find crazy
Jose was the first to really use 433 in the PL. He paved the way for modern PL football, but people are ignorant.
I think his time with Barca might have informed that formation/system
No, he wasn't. Talk about ignorance.
Wenger's 4-4-2 of the era was famously a 4-3-3 in hiding, being incredibly asymmetrical in how it played.
SAF used 433/4411 to great effect. Big Sam and Moyes were also fans.
@@kunimitsune177factually incorrect He used a 4-4-2
@@finding_aether factually incorrect He used a 4-4-2
I am an Arsenal fan who absolutely loves Jose Mourinho. What a tactician! Big respect!
Great series btw, keep this up please!
I love teams with strong defences. Only 15 goals conceded in a season is a crazy stat. Defending is not boring to me. I’m not a Chelsea fan, I support Arsenal but you have to respect Mourinho’s tactics
When Mourinho first started at Chelsea, they played a 4-3-1-2 like his Porto had, with Thiago Mendes and Makelele as both fairly-to-very defensive midfielders, Lampard also pretty deep as a mezzala/box-to-box player, and Aleksey Smertin or Joe Cole as a 10, Duff coming on as a substitute for width. It was when Robben got healthy that this new formation came to be, and then suddenly the team had both real width and were overpowering centrally, the switches between Duff and Robben were completely flummoxing defenders (hi Gary Neville!), fullbacks were flying on the overlap, Lampard was making his now-trademark runs, etc etc. They had been incredibly boring to that point, every game like some terrible Serie A game from the 90s, and then it was like an overnight transformation into a completely different, thrilling team. IF Essien had stayed healthy . . . what could have been (for me, Tiago was the weak link in the team, solid player but too slow physically for the PL and not quite fast enough mentally to compensate, unlike Fabregas in his later Chelsea stint). Also shout out to Steve Clarke, assistant manager. The inverted winger thing was genuinely new at the time.
Great comment 👍🏻👌🏻👍🏻
spot on mate
this should be pinned
Superb comment. You can always tell the real fans who watched the Chelsea games at the time vs someone analysing in retrospect. If I recall correctly it was after losing to Man City 1-0 that Mourinho made the switch. We were defensively solid but couldn't create enough chances before then.
This Chelsea team was special and deserves to be highlighted in this fashion. Thank you @FourFourTwo
Always wanted a series like this
LOVE THIS!!! Already massive fan of the channel but the more tactic knowledge you share, the more I watch!
This is absolutely brilliant. Thank you so much for starting retro tactics! Woud you consider doing a video on Liverpool's 08/09 team under Benetiz that nearly won the title?
This is GREAT! Definitely a series wroth continuing.
Very cool more of this please❤
Fantastic analysis! Keep these retro analysis coming.
With regard to attacking fullbacks and their genesis in English football. In the 1970s Aston Villa had two forward minded fullbacks in John Gidman (RB) and John Robson (LB) who were often forward of their associated midfielder on their respective wings. Gidman went on to play for Everton and Man Utd in a similar role. I’m pretty sure Bobby Robson did similar at Ipswich with his fullbacks.
Yeah. I don't know what he's on about. When i heard that i immediately thought of Carlos Alberto. Played RB for his entire career and scored 64 times, including a very famous goal in the 1970's world cup final, one of the 20 greatest world cup goals according to fifa
@@eduschafer true. Although I would suggest that Brazil had 10 outfield players at the time who could play almost any position on the pitch.. iirc Carlos Alberto is the first player I remember setting the ball 10 metres outside the post to then curl into the top corner of the goal. Although, at the time, the press put it down to ‘the rarified air of Mexico City’ and/or ‘the poorly designed Adidas ball’. A truly amazing defender who was also a complete footballer.
Thanks for making this video, I was quite young when watching chelsea win everything so didn't know the tactics at play, quite interesting looking at it now.
MOURINHO is by FAR THE BEST EVER
Conte also deserves a nod on for completely shattering the premier league trend, which Mourinho sparked and mentioned in this video, by playing a redacted version of his patented three at the back system. Loads of managers in the league and beyond would catch on to the benefits of his 3421 which emphasized overloads all over the pitch, including Gareth Southgate for England
Yes! I remember i was initially annoyed at first when other teams _copied_ Conte's implementation of three at the back and spiced it up to their own taste. These other teams gained succes at it, somewhat. But none of them had Kante in their squad. And that's what make Conte's Chelsea special to this day for me.
Please do Mourinho's 2011-2012 Real Madrid. That team was the greatest counter attacking team ever
Love this concept, really interesting! How about some of the really retro formations like:
- the 2-3-5 (which has now essentially come back)
- Herbert Chapman's W-M
- Hungary's 4-2-4
- Sir Alf's 4-4-2
15 goals conceded
The fact they were one game away from an Invincible season too
Porto fan here. I remember Gudjohnsen, he was Chelsea's Derlei, a utility, versatile forward that could show up in the box from every position and score.
Most people now adays have no love for the tacticality of the game any longer and are only interested in how many goals were scored. Mourinho's team was 2nd to Arsenal's in goals scored!! 2nd!! Won the most possessions in games, chances created, shots, and was very, very solid all over the pitch. You can't break them down.
not everyone would know, but Mourinho has spent his early years of “coaching” in Barcelona, as a translator - so of course, he’s also a student of the positional play philosophy, and i wouldn’t be surprised to learn that it was a game changer for PL
Positional play is not unique to Barca, in fact Milan under Sacchi did it better. Mourinho was a student of the game, and Barcelona was just a step for him. Infact the Benfica team where he started as a translator was where full back position was revolutionized for a long time
Awesome video. Please do more like this!
Brilliant video.
Glad you started this series with Chelsea 💙
*Jose not hose. Portuguese not Spanish.
Some of these things you could just as easily credit Wenger for. That 4-4-2 was more of a 4-3-3, Henry was as much a winger (an inverted one) as a striker and try telling me with a straight face that our fullbacks of the era didn't contribute going forward.
Jose had a much more balanced and complete squad for that end and seemed far more deliberate in this approach but he certainly wasn't the originator nor a revolutionary on his own.
Ranieri also played 4-3-3 against Lazio in the CL in 2003: Cudicini - Johnson, Gallas, Terry, Bridge - Veron, Makelele, Lampard - Mutu, Crespo, Duff.
It's got to be called Old-Skool TakTiks.
Great piece thank you
Do every team that won back to back titles in the PL era, even if only just to piss the Liverpool fans off 😎
Invert does not mean 'come inside'. That's why inside forwards and inverted wingers are different things.
Great Video❤
I'd like videos either on why the first Galacticos "failed" or on Ole Gunnar Solskjaer's runners-up season OR... how Spain fell off after 2012 Euros
that was _some_ lineup!
7:10 is incorrect. Mourinho's full-backs were notoriously defensive. He had spotted how Bridge and Glen Johnson had almost played as wing backs in 03-04 and left huge gaps, which plus a fairly high-line, left them vulnerable to the counter-attack. Hence the signing of Paulo Ferreira replacing Johnson, and eventually the replacement of Bridge with Gallas.
More, please. And could you do Retro-Tactics comparing teams promoted from Tier Two to Tier One in the 90s/00s compared to Luton / Burnley / Sheffield United of 24 to answer a question as to where the problems for promoted teams are.
For context, I watched Bradford City's two Premier League campaigns and while in some games they were just battered, in others two 442s went up against each other and the one which ran more won.
What a defensive masterclass this team was
This is excellent.
It’s a very niche shout, but Walter Smith’s Treble Winning Rangers 92/93 came within a game of the CL final and were unbeaten in Europe that season. This is with the 3 foreigner rule, and usually 2 Englishmen as 2/3 of them. They played a 442, with the best big man and poacher partnership I’ve ever seen, McCoist and Hateley. Such a tremendous team, cruelly pipped by a dodgy Marseille.
Loved this
Crazy how that 2004/5 team was one goal (dodgy pen tbh) away from going undefeated the year after the Invincibles did it. Would have been a better record too. 29 wins, 8 draws, 1 loss, 95 points.
Great content ! Would love to see one for Wengers 1998 champions - brining about what we see as modern football to england . And also - perhaps a little niche - but would love to see some teams like Potchetino’s nearly men Spurs 2017 , or Holloway’s blackpool 2011 .
Eidur is my all-time favourite Chelsea player!
Arsenal's invincibles marked the end of traditional English tactics. Mourinho's Chelsea marked the start of the modern era.
My suggestion for retro tactics...how did a small unfashionable club from an East Anglian backwater, Ipswich Town, push the juggernaut that was the Liverpool side of the late 70s and early 80s, so close on so many occasions. On paper it shouldn't have been possible.
Wtf Chelsea finished 2nd and went to the CL semi final before mourinho wow
That was a fluke. RanieriBall was horrible.
Jose said Gudjohnson closest match now is Havertz and he has been wasted. Thinks Arteta will make him world class
As well as all the obvious ones, I’d love to see something on Wimbledon’s thugs of 95.
Such a great video, how can someone subscribe twice.
I would love it if you did an entertainers video, love it !
Makalele desrevs most of credit. He actually suggested his role to Jose
No he didn't. He has acknowledged so, that his winger role was not working. Jose simply thought his recovery would work as a great screen. Jose had a similar role in Porto as well
I would love to see an interview with someone like Lampard or Terry and ask what it was like when they were first shown these tactics in training and what they thought of them?
There’s a lot good in this but a lot is a huge rewriting of history.
Full backs attacked loads for decades before this, Mourinho innovated a lot, but not everything! I’m not even going to name names because you know which full backs in the 90s ‘virtually did no attacking’? Hardly any of them.
And there were lots of ball playing centre halves in England. Albert, Howey, Mark Wright, Hansen, Lawrenson, Bould, Pallister..
Makalele was a slight difference but he wasn’t some world changing shock to everyone. He wasn’t THAT far away from David Batty or Nobby Stiles.
This stuff was mostly a slight evolution not a revolution.
Inverted wingers I’ll probably agree with.
Probably sounding snarkier than I meant to there, sorry!
Still an interesting video and you seem quite nice.
Loved your flag stuff tbf so I’ll take this
Can you do this on Pardew's Ben Arfa, Cisse and Ba team (Not forgetting Tiote and Cabaye)
Would love to see this for the '74 dutch world cup squad, and Rinus Michels's total football
His name isn't pronounced 'Ho-zay'. He's not Spanish and therefore being Portuguese, the 'J' in Jose is NOT silent and is pronounced in the usual way.
Just for future reference Mr Adam.
Max Allegri’s Scudetto Machine Juventus
Evolution of AC Milan through Maldini
Ancelotti’s 13/14 Real Madrid vs Mourinho’s Real Madrid
R9 and Inter Milan
Galacticos vs La Masia
18/19 Ajax
Champions League winning Ajax
Serie A Strikers vs Other Leagues
I don’t understand why the defensive midfielder suddenly became the number 6? 6 was always a CB with 5, 4 was the more defensive minded midfielder
Oh I could do a whole other video on this!! It’s to do with where in the world certain positions were first popularised.
@@FourFourTwo i figured that was probably the reason but please do a video on it! 👍
Newcastle entertainers. But also my girlfriend’s (and her families team) Portsmouth tactics. More per say 2008 FA cup winning team! My girlfriend is from Gosport (near Portsmouth) and I’m a geordie from Newcastle
Kids of today don't know how brilliant that Chelsea team was. One clown just saw the 15 goals conceded and said that team was defensive and no attack, 😅😅 clown, they can't even do research to know if its true or not. Some even don't believe that JT is a ball playing CB as well as being route 1 English defender.
Big ups to you Adam and your team.
Thats a naught, naughty team.
Bolton fans also remember Eidur Gudjohnsen!
where do i find a tactic board like that? looks really nice
Deep dive into Gerrard please!
Really want to see total football from Ajax and the Netherlands in the 70s.
Ahhh I can’t take it! It’s pronounced “Joe-say”, not “Ho-say “. It’s a hard J in Portuguese
It was driving me mad as well! 😂
I think you exagerate certain things, like full backs not attacking before Mourinho or the great british myth of Makelele "inventing" the holding midfielder position , but thanks for the video.
Why is this video 17:33 minutes long? He was given a blank cheque by Abramovich, and applied park the bus tactics when his team took the lead. Didn't work at Tottenham and Roma where he had weaker squads and less money to spend.
Can you do an ac Milan when Ronaldinho played for them
I love how brits pick and choose how to pronounce foreign names.
What does that even mean? It’s not about “picking” it’s about not knowing how words are pronounced in foreign languages which is fair enough because he’s not a polyglot.
Pls do one from barca
is Mourinho the greatest manager chelsea ever had
100%, who comes close?
Much of this is very good but the talk about Wayne Bridge being starting LB is nonsense. He only had 15 PL appearances over 2 years in that period. Gallas had 62 - over 4 times as much with many of those coming at LB. Even Del Horno had 25 PL apps in 05-06 alone.
His name is not Hose. He is not a Spaniard. His name is pronounced JOE-se. He is Portuguese and believe it or not, Portuguese people do not speak Spanish.
Absolutely love this series. Looking forward to Arsenal's Invincibles video
Lampard wouldn’t have scored as many goals without Drogba
am watching this for when chelsea sign mourinho again to replace PoCnettino .
nothing else going on? Try Vanarama
haha, Benson and Hedges
What about a vid on Houllier's Treble winners?
I really think you're over egging how 'innovative' this Chelsea side was tactically and strategically. Yes 442 of some type was the norm, but over the years there have been all sorts of formations and strategies.
And saying full backs weren't supposed to attack back then is crazy talk. This was 2005 for fs sake not 1955. There were full backs known for their attacking play as much as their defending in the 1970s. Certainly by the late 70s/early 80s such as Kenny Sansom, Viv Anderson. Phil Neal etc
This is Mourinho worship revisionism.
The best English club side I've ever seen would be worth a deep dive imo. It's the Liverpool of Barnes, Beardsley, Aldridge. That's how people remember them, i prefer to remember Nicol, McMahon, Houghton. Although the whole team was a bit special. Was it just great players or did they do something clever tactically too?
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ there that was quicker
Time to shave the head my guy
" Stuff of Legends " name to replace retro..
A bottomless pit of money?
And the new generation continues the thump the media lies and myths it spouts about mourinho. We absolutely dominated the league but the media said we were boring lol. We were making headlines every other day in footballing terms but the media said we played anti football. Screams of an agenda doesn’t it
He's Not Spanish. Why are you pronouncing his name as if he's Spanish? It's Joe-say, not hoe-say. Basic shit man come on
It’s wild how many football channels pronounce it wrong. Ben foster says hose as well
It’s not “basic shit” to be aware of how Portuguese is pronounced.
@@johnp515 He's a professional sports journalist talking about one of the most famous Managers to ever grace the game
Getting his name wrong is just embarrassing now. He's been a big name for 20 years now for fucks sake
The pronunciation of ‘José’ is horrible in this video. HE IS NOT SPANISH.
This guy doesn't understand football
Funny what a load of petroidollars can do!
Were the team tactics helped by economics?
No other manager that could do what Mourinho did back then, no matter how much money you have. His football intelligence is undeniable, you're truly a fool to put that down to his transfer budget. Is Pep Guardiola not a genius because he has a valuable squad? These managers aren't successful because of money, they get the big money BECAUSE they are successful. They have high value squads because they are the best people on the planet to make the most of that money.
simple; by Cheating.
I understand this is a channel about tactics but not calling out recognized cheaters is one of the big reasons football has recognized cheaters still playing.
Chelsea, City, PSG, Juventus- scum. nothing more but a stain on the game.
Man United, liverpool, Arsenal. Every club has bent or broken the rules. You’re just naming the clubs who have had modern investments and a club from serie A. You could name half the clubs in Serie A for cheating of some sorts.
@@MrRJT86 "modern investments" 🤡
They did cheat financially, but you cannot deny the level of coaching by the likes of Mourinho and Pep
And Liverpool have considerably cheated their way in the early 80's.
@@nananou1687 They wouldn't have that level of coaching without cheating.....