Both are 5.2 Both have painted stripes on the body, both have the same grills, same hoods, same rims, same badges. The 5.9 version had many differences from the 5.2. Both cars are 5.2 Limited
I agree. I dont know which jeep has which engine, but the green jeep was spinning 3 wheels while the purple jeep was ultimately a 2wd, one in the front and one in the rear.
5.2 all the way, revs quicker launches better then a 5.9 and its internally balanced vs externally balanced 5.9. Not to beat anybodies 5.9 down but remember the 318 5.2 is the perfect medium plenty or power and torque and comes in a little quicker then the slightly sluggisher big brother 5.9 + 5.2’s are reliable as hell kinda like the 5.0’s from F150’s (90’s era)
I think the 5.9 revs way quicker under load. And i feel like in the case of the jeep the 5.9 would be better. Less throttle required for movement, the 5.9 is a torquey small block with big block potential cant beat that. The 5.2 is a very nice motor tho, i want one but i dont have a vehicle for it lol
I bought my '95 ZJ with 32,000 miles on it, and at 336,000 miles it was still going strong - never had the head off the engine - until it was rear-ended by a Peterbuilt and "totaled"...4.0 Forever!
So I have that 5-9 in my Dodge Ram the only thing that makes the five nine different from the five two is the heads and I think the crank other than that same block and everything only about 15 horsepower difference is well depending on what year it is
Heads, compression ratio, pistons, cam, lifters.. Have had 5.9 both la block motors and early 70's old school, la block 5.2's, and the 3.9 v6. All decent motors, but hate every chrysler auto after the og 727 auto transmission. Wish all auto makers would spend the time engineering and money for better transmissions, could be planned obsolescence too...
Yes, the reason why I bought a 2000 Dodge Ram after my 88 Dodge Dakota with 3.9 v6 Quit. Well, the motor didn't really quit what happened. Is it basically electrical gave up on the truck So that's why I bought a 2000 Dodge Ram cuz I know it was still sort of old fool under the hood. It still had a distributor cap. The simple 5.9 liter V8, it loves gas, but it takes a licking and keeps on ticking. I just don't care for the new new vehicles anymore. They just are money pits. And I'm totally happy driving a good old reliable vehicle.
@@darkleopard3381 right there with you man, and more people are feeling it too. Auto makers are just pandering to market trying to keep afloat in todays market, well kinda have been since the start but in dumber ways now due to people "wanting" safer vehicles.. Irony being, the easier stuff is to operate the less engaged and attentive some are which creates complacency, which is more dangerous for everyone. I guess I am old school; I prefer over built, manuel windows, manual transmissions, no computers, no electronic sensors, easy maintenence, and much less plastic vehicles. Lol Cheers man 👍
Bore and stroke are different between 318/360. HP is nearly identical at 235 but 5.9 torque is a little more. IF it has the Mopar preformance computer which all 98 5.9 jeeps came with then the 360/5.9 goes to 245 hp. Great motors but not the same hence 5.2 vs 5.9 MOPAR2YA
@@stuartlenk9436 you will want adjustable arms if you go that high otherwise you will get bad vibrations. I went with Core4*4 arms and track bars, Rubicon express 4.5 springs, and Bilstein 5100 shocks.
@@brandonpurple8938 I changed my cam and Harland sharp rolling rockers, unfortunately in the UK we don't get the 5.2 or 5.9 but if you get a chance check out new comer racing, up to 700hp out of a 4.0 which I think is wow I thought getting 500hp was good, I would love to get 5.9 v8 and see what it could do😁👍
Great engines too bad the transmissions usually goes before anything else, I've owned two 5.2 zj and the mileage isn't an issue it's really about how it was maintained and "offroad" hours it has, doing bad torque converter on my 96 orvis rn I've heard the 5.9 have issues with reverse going bad and not the easiest to work on since such a large drivetrain fit into a truck that size
@@chaoszombie9995 It would make more sense if I correctly said "longer stroke" instead of "bore". Racer driver and owner Brock Yates bought and ran a 5.9 Grand Cherokee when they came out in '98 and loved it. See article in Car & Driver.
The last minute or so ... wtf did I just watch?
The last minute you see the 'X-Mog'
Here my friend ruclips.net/video/JgNtG9pjkG4/видео.html
Both are amazing motors but damn the 5.2 proves itself very well 💪
The 5.2 is the original old school. The Chrysler 318 is the last good purely chrysler engine. Power isn't everything.
@@Jiffypistol All that motor wants to do is run, the jeeps electrical cursed it. That motor is probably one ill run til the day i die.
@@chicagorc3967 Not so much for the older ones though. 1999 and back is fine.
@@Jiffypistol Good thing mines a 97 lol
Love my 5.9 in Stone White w/Charcoal Grey leather!
Perfect video my friend. won a subscriber from southern Brazil.
Imagine a talking XJ jacked up like that peaking through your window. Maximum overdrive 🤣
Both are 5.2 Both have painted stripes on the body, both have the same grills, same hoods, same rims, same badges. The 5.9 version had many differences from the 5.2. Both cars are 5.2 Limited
5.9s all day lol love em both
If your viscous coupler wasn't bad, it is now!
Keep in mind; on top of having more power, the 5.9 has an LSD in the back, which will aid it with traction too
I agree. I dont know which jeep has which engine, but the green jeep was spinning 3 wheels while the purple jeep was ultimately a 2wd, one in the front and one in the rear.
I feel like the v8 4.7 would beat both the 5.2 and 5.9 because it makes more torque in low rpm
The purple is my 5.2 ZJ without LSD.
The Black 5.9 have LSD in the rear axle.
@@aarons2613 pushrod V8s have more low end torque.
nice video, what is the color of those jeeps?
That bonusvideo at the end (Y).
That's the 'X-Mog'
ruclips.net/video/JgNtG9pjkG4/видео.html
Haben beide ordentlich Dampf unter der Haube da müssen wir glaube ich nicht drüber diskutieren 😅
Wie immer top Video weiter so👍👌
Jo Jo danke, nicht alle sehen das so, war ja auch nur just for fun 👍🥳🥳
Spaß muss es machen 👍😂
I like the 5.2
Hahahaha euch ist wohl langweilig gewesen 🙈
Voll cool 👍🏻💪😎
Paul hatte Geburtstag 😂👍
My Jeep 🚙 Grand Cherokee Orvis Edition V 8 5,2 1995 Original 👍 /Baghdad Evening Jan 17 /Duraid 😎🚙👍👌👏
I’ve owned a 97 ZJ 5.2, and the engine and power was great, but the trans completely went out at 156,000
the 5.9 gets a beefier trans. i think it’s the same one in the ram trucks
@@HobbsCedric1 5.9 model is identical except for body so yeah
Красавцы Лайк.
The best tutorial on how to brake your transmission
Молодцы мужики
Es ist schön, dass es in Deutschland die richtigen Leute gibt.
Но в России есть гораздо лучшие варианты для бездорожья.
Nicht überall aber wir versuchen das auszugleichen 👍🥳
5.2 all the way, revs quicker launches better then a 5.9 and its internally balanced vs externally balanced 5.9. Not to beat anybodies 5.9 down but remember the 318 5.2 is the perfect medium plenty or power and torque and comes in a little quicker then the slightly sluggisher big brother 5.9 + 5.2’s are reliable as hell kinda like the 5.0’s from F150’s (90’s era)
I think the 5.9 revs way quicker under load. And i feel like in the case of the jeep the 5.9 would be better. Less throttle required for movement, the 5.9 is a torquey small block with big block potential cant beat that. The 5.2 is a very nice motor tho, i want one but i dont have a vehicle for it lol
5.9 all day
5.9 all day
👏👏👏👏👏
War wohl ein gelungener Geburtstag :)
Hättest einfach kommen können ;)
@@PerfektDrug das nächste mal bin ich definitiv dabei 👍
If I wanted a 5.2, what years should I look at?
98
.....and my 4.0 has 368000 miles on it and purrs like a kitten.
James oppy mine just went off 370k always choose the 4.0 over most motors
Yup! 365 000 on mine
Ya my 96 zj 4.0 is sitting at 420,000 all original driveline, they just keep going lol
318k on mine and its a 5.2 !
I bought my '95 ZJ with 32,000 miles on it, and at 336,000 miles it was still going strong - never had the head off the engine - until it was rear-ended by a Peterbuilt and "totaled"...4.0 Forever!
Is the 5.9 on the left or right?
The Black ist a 5.9 ZG from Austria ;l
So I have that 5-9 in my Dodge Ram the only thing that makes the five nine different from the five two is the heads and I think the crank other than that same block and everything only about 15 horsepower difference is well depending on what year it is
Heads, compression ratio, pistons, cam, lifters.. Have had 5.9 both la block motors and early 70's old school, la block 5.2's, and the 3.9 v6. All decent motors, but hate every chrysler auto after the og 727 auto transmission. Wish all auto makers would spend the time engineering and money for better transmissions, could be planned obsolescence too...
Yes, the reason why I bought a 2000 Dodge Ram after my 88 Dodge Dakota with 3.9 v6 Quit. Well, the motor didn't really quit what happened. Is it basically electrical gave up on the truck So that's why I bought a 2000 Dodge Ram cuz I know it was still sort of old fool under the hood. It still had a distributor cap. The simple 5.9 liter V8, it loves gas, but it takes a licking and keeps on ticking. I just don't care for the new new vehicles anymore. They just are money pits. And I'm totally happy driving a good old reliable vehicle.
@@darkleopard3381 right there with you man, and more people are feeling it too. Auto makers are just pandering to market trying to keep afloat in todays market, well kinda have been since the start but in dumber ways now due to people "wanting" safer vehicles.. Irony being, the easier stuff is to operate the less engaged and attentive some are which creates complacency, which is more dangerous for everyone.
I guess I am old school; I prefer over built, manuel windows, manual transmissions, no computers, no electronic sensors, easy maintenence, and much less plastic vehicles. Lol
Cheers man 👍
Bore and stroke are different between 318/360. HP is nearly identical at 235 but 5.9 torque is a little more. IF it has the Mopar preformance computer which all 98 5.9 jeeps came with then the 360/5.9 goes to 245 hp. Great motors but not the same hence 5.2 vs 5.9 MOPAR2YA
Best brand for a 4.5/5 inch lift for a zj? (5.9)
Short or long arms?
Stock arms for now till I can afford to upgrade myself
@@stuartlenk9436 you will want adjustable arms if you go that high otherwise you will get bad vibrations. I went with Core4*4 arms and track bars, Rubicon express 4.5 springs, and Bilstein 5100 shocks.
Kyle White alright for sure man I appreciate it
both great engines would love to see how my 4.7 stroker supercharged would do against 5.9?😀
All that money to keep up or beat a 5.9
@@brandonpurple8938 well yes some money spent, but boy does she fly and you can't put a price on the smile it gives you😁
@@lukeparkinson9794 I'll just cam my 5.9 and be happy lol
@@brandonpurple8938 I changed my cam and Harland sharp rolling rockers, unfortunately in the UK we don't get the 5.2 or 5.9 but if you get a chance check out new comer racing, up to 700hp out of a 4.0 which I think is wow I thought getting 500hp was good, I would love to get 5.9 v8 and see what it could do😁👍
@@lukeparkinson9794 fr the 360 is nice
👍👍👍👍🔥
Didn’t know Germany had petrol Jeeps lol
😂😂😂💪
Great engines too bad the transmissions usually goes before anything else, I've owned two 5.2 zj and the mileage isn't an issue it's really about how it was maintained and "offroad" hours it has, doing bad torque converter on my 96 orvis rn I've heard the 5.9 have issues with reverse going bad and not the easiest to work on since such a large drivetrain fit into a truck that size
The 5.2 and 5.9 drivetrains are identical when it comes to physical size.
transmission is an easy pull on the car, it’s fixing it that’s the hard part for these.
I did this with my 5.9 to my friends 5.2 n she won 2 I won 1 I kept loosing traction but the 5.2 pulled 6500lbs 5.9 only 5500
JEEP .THE ORIGINAL!
🤟🤟
What gears
Dan Davies what you mean? Orginal gears 🤷♂️
Paul Schulz well some grands came with 3.73 overall and others came with the 3.53
Have 3:73 both, the X-Mog have 7:56
Jeep классные машины делает
Очень!
Но вообще это концерн крайслер. Бери любой Jeep и езди.
2:15 .. why? Poor kj:((
Imma be 100% honest, I didn’t know they made a 5.9 litre V8...
Its the old Dodge 360 cubic inch V8; a longer bore version of the 340. Great engine, easy to build torque and horsepower cheap.
trjnsd ohh, ok.. that makes more sense lol
@@chaoszombie9995 It would make more sense if I correctly said "longer stroke" instead of "bore". Racer driver and owner Brock Yates bought and ran a 5.9 Grand Cherokee when they came out in '98 and loved it. See article in Car & Driver.
Algun canal de jeep Cherokee que sea en español 😪👍🏼
Encontraste alguno?
@@RicardoAlvarezMx nada compa y usted?
@@mariovandervar8542 casi no hay carnal
@@jrcarrillo3473 es lo que note compa😪
All of themes are zj 5.2
This doesn't prove which one has more power, only better traction. A 4.0 ZJ could have pulled that 5.9 if it was set up right.
походу последняя извилина перемкнула..
Weels..
👌👍👍👍😀
That xj is the shit
Aren’t the 5.9s LJs
No they are zj's. Lj is the long jeep. 04-06 wrangler.
После этого контракт европа
The 5.2 has more torque
No it doesn't.. Well, at least not by OEM specs.
What the fuck is a zg. All 90s grands are zjs
Hi there. The ZG is a ZJ that was built in Austria. Many jeeps for Europe are built in Austria.
@@PerfektDrug that's crazy
We are from Germany. The purple one is my ZJ. This is an import from US. A 5.2 ;)
360 cubic inches and only a shitty 245 hp... that's pathetic for a large small block v8 used In a 1998 zj.
yerwrng but they life a long time without problems 🤷♂️😁
🎵🎶🎵🎶🎶
🤣🤣
My 4.0 would pull either of them
Shane Mayfield baahahahahahaha!
Doubt.
I've owned a sassy 4.0 and the 5.2 makes it look like bitch tits. Your 4.0 wouldn't do shit vs those two
You obviously haven't driven either of the v8 models
Shane Mayfield na dann komm mal her 🤷♂️ das wird ein Spaß, than come, we make some fun 👍👍😂
Pretty senseless if not stupid!