HEARSAY - NOT hearsay defined, statements by party opponents

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 23 дек 2024

Комментарии • 15

  • @andreaonwilliams8065
    @andreaonwilliams8065 2 года назад +2

    Getting my students ready for mock trial state competition and this exception gave us fits.This video cleared a lot of the confusion for this rarely used exception. Thank you.

    • @professorporter
      @professorporter  2 года назад +1

      Actually, this rule comes up quite a bit in real and mock trials because parties regularly have an interest in presenting the statements from the parties on the other side of the case.

  • @virtuousmama6089
    @virtuousmama6089 Год назад

    Pls clarify what is meant by party opponent. Thank you

    • @professorporter
      @professorporter  Год назад

      “Party opponent” is a phase that comes from the rule and it means the other party. If you represent the plaintiff, than the defendant is the party opponent. If you rep the defendant, then the plaintiff is the party opponent.

    • @virtuousmama6089
      @virtuousmama6089 Год назад

      @@professorporter thank you! I figured it out after listening twice

  • @leitapowers7080
    @leitapowers7080 2 года назад +1

    The example with the gf was what I was looking for, thanks so much. Studying for the bar and this kept tripping me up. Appreciate your videos :)

  • @dd-xg6hm
    @dd-xg6hm Год назад

    Thank you for the greaat video!
    Just had one question: Is it also okay to use it in cross examination?
    for ex) prosecutor to the defense witness: the defendant told you this --

    • @professorporter
      @professorporter  Год назад

      Yes. The rules don’t distinguish between direct and cross. So long as it’s said by the defendant and offered by the prosecution.

  • @silentkashful
    @silentkashful 2 года назад

    What do you mean when you say "done deal" thrown out? Or allowed? Very confusing 😕

  • @amberklein1560
    @amberklein1560 2 года назад +1

    What does "game over" mean? Is it hearsay or not?!
    Pretend I'm not a law student, and just trying to understand party-opponents before I go to court.

    • @professorporter
      @professorporter  2 года назад

      Game over = admissible. The jury is permitted to hear it

  • @Lulutsh
    @Lulutsh 3 года назад +1

    Helpful. Thank you

  • @ThreeDaysOfDan
    @ThreeDaysOfDan 3 года назад +1

    pure gold!

  • @alexmurphy1230
    @alexmurphy1230 7 лет назад +1

    Great stuff! very helpful.