my notes: Maritime: related to the sea Technology that helped maritime empires grow European Tech Europeans want to find another way to Asia (Muslims controlled lots of ports and Europeans want to establish their own terms) Look west Needed new tech Learned from Greeks, Asians, Muslims (more advanced than Europeans Accurate records of wind patterns, detailed astronomical charts (around for a while, Mesopotamia n China, but more detailed) Astrolabe: told sailers how far N. or S. they were from the equator magnetic compass: gave sailors ability to know exactly which direction they were headed by the north/south magnetic field that runs across earth lateen sail: triangular sail that could catch wind on both sides of the ship New maritime tech Portuguese Caravel: smaller (highly navigable along coastlines and rivers), fast (combo of square and lateen sails), could carry a lot of cargo Dutch Fluyt: exclusively for trade, larger cargo bays (carry more tradable goods), smaller crews needed to sail, cost half as much as older ships Before: most merchant ships were built in a way that if needed for battle it could be easily converted into a warship (v. expensive to build, require huge crews to sail)
CHAPTER LEARNING OBJECTIVES• To introduce students to the variety of empires of the early modern period• To emphasize that empire building was not just a Western European phenomenon• To explore the range of colonial societies that evolved and the reasons for differences between them• To emphasize the massive social reordering that attended European colonization in the Western HemisphereBig Picture Questions BPQ1. In comparing the European empires in the Americas with the Russian, Chinese, Mughal, and Ottoman empires, should world historians emphasize the similarities or the differences? What are the implications of each approach? BPQ2. In what different ways was European colonial rule expressed and experienced in the Americas? BPQ3. Why did the European empires in the Americas have such an enormously greater impact on the conquered people than did the Chinese, Mughal, and Ottoman empires? BPQ4. In what ways did the empires of the early modern era continue patterns of earlier empires? In what ways did they depart from those patterns?Margin Review Questions MRQ1. What enabled Europeans to carve out huge empires an ocean away from their homelands? MRQ2. What large-scale transformations did European empires generate? MRQ3. What was the economic foundation of colonial rule in Mexico and Peru? How did it shape the kinds of societies that arose there? MRQ4. How did the plantation societies of Brazil and the Caribbean differ from those of southern colonies in British North America? MRQ5. What distinguished the British settler colonies of North America from their counterparts in Latin America? MRQ6. What motivated Russian empire building? MRQ7. How did the Russian Empire transform the life of its conquered people and of the Russian homeland itself? MRQ8. What were the major features of Chinese empire building in the early modern era? MRQ9. How did Mughal attitudes and policies toward Hindus change from the time of Akbar to that of Aurangzeb? MRQ10. In what ways was the Ottoman Empire important for Europe in the early modern era?Key TermsAkbar: The most famous emperor of India’s Mughal Empire (r. 1556-1605); his policies are noted for their efforts at religious tolerance and inclusion. (pron. AHK-bar) Aurangzeb: Mughal emperor (r. 1658-1707) who reversed his predecessors’ policies of religious tolerance and attempted to impose Islamic supremacy. (pron. ow-rang-ZEB) Columbian exchange: The massive transatlantic interaction and exchange between the Americas and Afro-Eurasia that began in the period of European exploration and colonization. conquistadores: Spanish conquerors of the Native American lands, most notably the Aztec and Inca empires. (pron. kon-KEY-stuh-dor-ays) Constantinople, 1453: Constantinople, the capital and almost the only outpost left of the Byzantine Empire, fell to the army of the Ottoman sultan Mehmed II “the Conqueror” in 1453, an event that marked the end of Christian Byzantium. creoles: Spaniards born in the Americas. devshirme: The tribute of boy children that the Ottoman Turks levied from their Christian subjects in the Balkans; the Ottomans raised the boys for service in the civil administration or in the elite Janissary infantry corps. (pron. dev-sheer-MEH) fixed winds: The prevailing winds of the Atlantic, which blow steadily in the same direction; an understanding of these winds made European exploration and colonization of the Americas possible. “great dying,” the: Term used to describe the devastating demographic impact of European-borne epidemic diseases on the Americas. jizya: Special tax levied on non-Muslims in Islamic states; the Mughal Empire was notable for abolishing the jizya for a time. (pron. JIZ-yah) mercantilism: An economic theory that argues that governments best serve their states’ economic interests by encouraging exports and accumulating bullion. mestizo: Literally, “mixed”; a term used to describe the mixed-race population of Spanish colonial societies in the Americas. (pron. mess-TEE-zoh) Mughal Empire: One of the most successful empires of India, a state founded by Muslim Turks who invaded India in 1526; their rule was noted for efforts to create partnerships between Hindus and Muslims. (pron. MOO-guhl) mulattoes: Term commonly used for people of mixed African and European blood. Ottoman Empire: Major Islamic state centered on Anatolia that came to include the Balkans, the Near East, and much of North Africa. peninsulares: In the Spanish colonies of Latin America, the term used to refer to people who had been born in Spain; they claimed superiority over Spaniards born in the Americas. (pron. pen-in-soo-LAHR-es) plantation complex: Agricultural system based on African slavery that was used in Brazil, the Caribbean, and the southern colonies of North America. Qing dynasty: Ruling dynasty of China from 1644 to 1912; the Qing rulers were originally from Manchuria, which had conquered China. (pron. ching) settler colonies: Colonies in which the colonizing people settled in large numbers, rather than simply spending relatively small numbers to exploit the region; particularly noteworthy in the case of the British colonies in North America. Siberia: Russia’s great frontier region, a vast territory of what is now central and eastern Russia, most of it unsuited to agriculture but rich in mineral resources and fur-bearing animals. yasak: Tribute that Russian rulers demanded from the native peoples of Siberia, most often in the form of furs. (pron. YAH-sahk) Zunghars: Western Mongol group that created a substantial state (1671-1760); the Zunghar threat provoked Qing expansion into Central Asia. (pron. ZOON-gars) Vocab Quizlet --> quizlet.com/19781272/ap-world-history-unit-4-vocabulary-project-flash-cards/
If anything, gunpowder was more effective in naval than land use in this period. One major problem with land use of gunpowder is that it is really, really hard to haul heavy cannon over the unpaved roads of the period. For example, to make the cannon that battered down the walls of Constantinople in 1453, a foundry was set up in the siege camp, and the cannon were cast right there. When cannon were hauled overland, large teams of (usually) oxen were needed to drag them over the low-quality unpaved roads. A good day would see only 15-20 km travelled with men and animals being dead tired at the end of the day. And if it rained and the roads turned to mud, forget it! On the other hand, ships are designed to carry large heavy objects such as cannon. With favorable winds, ships of this period can move 15 km PER HOUR. And do it 24 hours of the day. The same is true of ammunition in this period. It is much, much easier to transport it by sea than by land. I am an Army veteran. And one of our sayings is, "Amateurs talk about strategy. Professionals talk about logistics." In the period before 1750, the logistics of transporting a gunpowder army and its artillery by sea gave maritime empires an enormous advantage over land-based empires.
Hey Kevin, I agree with you on all counts. It’s during this period (starting 1450) that the power really began to shift to the nations who could handle the seas. Also, I love the amateur/professional quote. Can you say more about it? Seems like it could apply to more than just the military.
@@heimlershistory Sure! Professionals know that the two key factors in modern armed conflict are logistics and the will of the people to fight. For example, a one-sentence summary of WWI is, "The Royal Navy starved Germany into submission while an entire generation of European youth killed each other in futile land battles." In November 1918, the German army was undefeated and not a single Allied soldier had set foot on German soil. Yet the people were starving and knew that the Allied logistical superiority made military defeat inevitable. So they lost the will to resist, engaged in a revolution and overthrew the German government. It is possible to have brilliant strategy, win all of the battles, inflict massive losses upon the enemy, but still lose the war. For example, the US/Vietnam war. This was largely a logistics war. The USA sought to interdict supply lines, such as the Ho Chi Mihn Trail, and to use chemical defoliants such as Agent Orange to remove the capability of the jungle to supply a secure base area. The actual large-scale battles were all crushing American victories. A good example of this was the 1968 Tet Offensive. A massive US military victory. Although historians still debate the exact casualty ratio, it was roughly 10:1 in favor of the USA. And yet this decisive military victory was key to US defeat in Vietnam. The problem was, to quote LBJ, "The American people don't care about the 10, they care about the one." Strategic victory was turned into political defeat by loss of the will of the people to fight. The same can be said of the Soviet Union's military intervention in Afghanistan. WWII was also a logistical war for resources, with the #1 cause of German defeat being lack of oil.
My teacher puts these videos for us to watch, and they help a lot because in our school we have a lot of homework and these videos help a lot. We are starting Units 3.2, 3.3, 3.4.
Notes from the video+ the AMSCO AP World guide, we've got this guys Maritime empires grew due to factors not primarily relating to gunpowder like the land-based empires New ideas stemmed from Asian and Islamic ideas Ship building became easier because there were more accurate records of wind patterns and detailed astronomical charts lateen sail: triangular sail that could catch the wind on both sides of the ship some ships combined square and lateen sails, causing the ship to be able to travel far (caravel) most ships in this time were created in a way where they could be transformed into a warship when needed ships were very expensive to build & required large crews These ships included the: Caravel: Portuguese manufactured, spanish used, smaller ship for navigation Lateen sails (2-3) could still carry a lot of cargo. 15th-17th centuries Fluyt- Dutch, large and built exclusively for trade had large cargo bays, didn't need large crews, cost to build was 1/2 the cost as many ships @ this time 16th-17th centuries square, 2-3 masts Carack- portuguese, biggest, made for only trade Square and Lateen masts (3-4) 14th-17th Astrolabe: old sailors how far north or south they were from the equator Magnetic compass: told sailors which direction they were going in. Cartography- mapmaking, increased maritime navigation New Maritime Tech caused a rapid expansion of European trade Prince Henry the Navigator- financed Portuguese exploration that lead the European world out of Europe
my notes! maritime - related to the sea since muslims controlled most of the land and ports that pass through the trade routes, europeans had a difficue establishing trade on their own terms europeans wanted to know if there was another way to asia they inherited astrolabe, magnetic compass, lateen sail from the greeks, asians, and muslims. portugues: created caravel much smaller highly navigatable along coastlines and river fast because of combination of lateen and square sails can carry a lot of cargo dutch: fluyt exclusively for trade built with large cargo much smaller crews
Unit 4 is kind of a beast. I don’t think I have any particular advice for this unit that wouldn’t apply to any others. Make sure you know the main themes and get down a few specific vocab words to illustrate each theme. For example, the first topic is about technology that helped European exploration. A good illustration of that is the magnetic compass or the lateen sail. I’m not sure how good that advice is, but that’s what I’d do...
I have been following ur videos for the past few units and they have been on pace but this unit 4 doesn’t match up with my curriculum? We are currently doing the Atlantic slave trade , Colombian exchange, new world, etc so could u match up to those? also thanks for ur videos they a lifesaver
In the ultimate review packet, is there sections for each topic or just the units as a whole? I bought the packet and wanted to know so I'm not missing anything.
Hi Mr. Heimler I love your videos, and it really helps me prepare for a unit test. But is it info. if you want an A in the class. Should I read the textbook as well and maybe watch crash course. (im too lazy to read the textbook)
Glad you’re finding the video helpful. It’s hard to give the kind of advice you’re looking for, but honestly I’ve never heard of anyone getting an A in an AP class unless they cheated or worked very hard. And I’m not suggesting the former. I would say if you’re not interested in the hard work then just take the B or C in the class. Maybe it’s worth it if you get to do other things you love...
Question...my daughter bought your the noteguide package for your program. She said that Unit 4 did not match up with what her class was learning in Chapter 4. What text book is this based off of?
![EUROPEAN Exploration [AP World History Review] Unit 4 Topic 2](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/OL7k4t9vDho/mqdefault.jpg)
![EUROPEAN Exploration [AP World History Review] Unit 4 Topic 2](/img/tr.png)
![AP World History UNIT 4 REVIEW [Everything You NEED to Know!]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/JnmHOBcILmg/mqdefault.jpg)
![Sea-Based EMPIRES ESTABLISHED [AP World History Review-Unit 4 Topic 4]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/uyN-jFvI9vo/mqdefault.jpg)
![Quando Rondo - Grow Up [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8zFnCg3BO4Q/mqdefault.jpg)
Just some term timestamps for studying
Maritime 0:34
Astrolabe 2:03
Magnetic Compass 2:11
Lateen sail 2:19
Caravel 2:43
Fluyt 3:11
Dallas Hansen we bless
wish I read the comments before watching the video... lol we love.
Doin the lord's work
Evan Miller 😂😂😂
bro u just saved me and everyone else's time
never stop making these! you’re right with my class curriculum, and also your videos make it so much easier to grasp this information!
I'll keep making them for sure. I'll have 4.2 up early next week and hopefully 4.3 and 4.4 up later in the week.
Riley J Brown obioma
you’re the reason why i haven’t dropped my ap world class! I love your videos!!
This man is an absolute legend, get him more subs!
Ha, thanks for putting the call out...
my notes:
Maritime: related to the sea
Technology that helped maritime empires grow
European Tech
Europeans want to find another way to Asia (Muslims controlled lots of ports and Europeans want to establish their own terms)
Look west
Needed new tech
Learned from Greeks, Asians, Muslims (more advanced than Europeans
Accurate records of wind patterns, detailed astronomical charts (around for a while, Mesopotamia n China, but more detailed)
Astrolabe: told sailers how far N. or S. they were from the equator
magnetic compass: gave sailors ability to know exactly which direction they were headed by the north/south magnetic field that runs across earth
lateen sail: triangular sail that could catch wind on both sides of the ship
New maritime tech
Portuguese
Caravel: smaller (highly navigable along coastlines and rivers), fast (combo of square and lateen sails), could carry a lot of cargo
Dutch
Fluyt: exclusively for trade, larger cargo bays (carry more tradable goods), smaller crews needed to sail, cost half as much as older ships
Before: most merchant ships were built in a way that if needed for battle it could be easily converted into a warship (v. expensive to build, require huge crews to sail)
TYSM
i'll feel sorry for you if you're the one who gets to read my essay
felt
aya yousif AYA WHAT ARE U DOING HEREEEEEEE
aya yousif AHHAHA
Bahhahahaha, this made me laugh 😭
CHAPTER LEARNING OBJECTIVES• To introduce students to the variety of empires of the early modern period• To emphasize that empire building was not just a Western European phenomenon• To explore the range of colonial societies that evolved and the reasons for differences between them• To emphasize the massive social reordering that attended European colonization in the Western HemisphereBig Picture Questions
BPQ1. In comparing the European empires in the Americas with the Russian, Chinese, Mughal, and Ottoman empires, should world historians emphasize the similarities or the differences? What are the implications of each approach?
BPQ2. In what different ways was European colonial rule expressed and experienced in the Americas?
BPQ3. Why did the European empires in the Americas have such an enormously greater impact on the conquered people than did the Chinese, Mughal, and Ottoman empires?
BPQ4. In what ways did the empires of the early modern era continue patterns of earlier empires? In what ways did they depart from those patterns?Margin Review Questions
MRQ1. What enabled Europeans to carve out huge empires an ocean away from their homelands?
MRQ2. What large-scale transformations did European empires generate?
MRQ3. What was the economic foundation of colonial rule in Mexico and Peru? How did it shape the kinds of societies that arose there? MRQ4. How did the plantation societies of Brazil and the Caribbean differ from those of southern colonies in British North America?
MRQ5. What distinguished the British settler colonies of North America from their counterparts in Latin America?
MRQ6. What motivated Russian empire building?
MRQ7. How did the Russian Empire transform the life of its conquered people and of the Russian homeland itself?
MRQ8. What were the major features of Chinese empire building in the early modern era?
MRQ9. How did Mughal attitudes and policies toward Hindus change from the time of Akbar to that of Aurangzeb?
MRQ10. In what ways was the Ottoman Empire important for Europe in the early modern era?Key TermsAkbar: The most famous emperor of India’s Mughal Empire (r. 1556-1605); his policies are noted for their efforts at religious tolerance and inclusion. (pron. AHK-bar)
Aurangzeb: Mughal emperor (r. 1658-1707) who reversed his predecessors’ policies of religious tolerance and attempted to impose Islamic supremacy. (pron. ow-rang-ZEB)
Columbian exchange: The massive transatlantic interaction and exchange between the Americas and Afro-Eurasia that began in the period of European exploration and colonization.
conquistadores: Spanish conquerors of the Native American lands, most notably the Aztec and Inca empires. (pron. kon-KEY-stuh-dor-ays)
Constantinople, 1453: Constantinople, the capital and almost the only outpost left of the Byzantine Empire, fell to the army of the Ottoman sultan Mehmed II “the Conqueror” in 1453, an event that marked the end of Christian Byzantium.
creoles: Spaniards born in the Americas.
devshirme: The tribute of boy children that the Ottoman Turks levied from their Christian subjects in the Balkans; the Ottomans raised the boys for service in the civil administration or in the elite Janissary infantry corps. (pron. dev-sheer-MEH)
fixed winds: The prevailing winds of the Atlantic, which blow steadily in the same direction; an understanding of these winds made European exploration and colonization of the Americas possible.
“great dying,” the: Term used to describe the devastating demographic impact of European-borne epidemic diseases on the Americas.
jizya: Special tax levied on non-Muslims in Islamic states; the Mughal Empire was notable for abolishing the jizya for a time. (pron. JIZ-yah)
mercantilism: An economic theory that argues that governments best serve their states’ economic interests by encouraging exports and accumulating bullion.
mestizo: Literally, “mixed”; a term used to describe the mixed-race population of Spanish colonial societies in the Americas. (pron. mess-TEE-zoh)
Mughal Empire: One of the most successful empires of India, a state founded by Muslim Turks who invaded India in 1526; their rule was noted for efforts to create partnerships between Hindus and Muslims. (pron. MOO-guhl)
mulattoes: Term commonly used for people of mixed African and European blood.
Ottoman Empire: Major Islamic state centered on Anatolia that came to include the Balkans, the Near East, and much of North Africa.
peninsulares: In the Spanish colonies of Latin America, the term used to refer to people who had been born in Spain; they claimed superiority over Spaniards born in the Americas. (pron. pen-in-soo-LAHR-es)
plantation complex: Agricultural system based on African slavery that was used in Brazil, the Caribbean, and the southern colonies of North America.
Qing dynasty: Ruling dynasty of China from 1644 to 1912; the Qing rulers were originally from Manchuria, which had conquered China. (pron. ching)
settler colonies: Colonies in which the colonizing people settled in large numbers, rather than simply spending relatively small numbers to exploit the region; particularly noteworthy in the case of the British colonies in North America.
Siberia: Russia’s great frontier region, a vast territory of what is now central and eastern Russia, most of it unsuited to agriculture but rich in mineral resources and fur-bearing animals.
yasak: Tribute that Russian rulers demanded from the native peoples of Siberia, most often in the form of furs. (pron. YAH-sahk)
Zunghars: Western Mongol group that created a substantial state (1671-1760); the Zunghar threat provoked Qing expansion into Central Asia. (pron. ZOON-gars)
Vocab Quizlet -->
quizlet.com/19781272/ap-world-history-unit-4-vocabulary-project-flash-cards/
Not even joking, when he said "add a little gunpowder to our stew" a firework went off in my neighborhood lol
ok
LMAOOOO
These videos are so helpful! I have my unit 4 exam soon and this is so helpful for review
If anything, gunpowder was more effective in naval than land use in this period. One major problem with land use of gunpowder is that it is really, really hard to haul heavy cannon over the unpaved roads of the period. For example, to make the cannon that battered down the walls of Constantinople in 1453, a foundry was set up in the siege camp, and the cannon were cast right there.
When cannon were hauled overland, large teams of (usually) oxen were needed to drag them over the low-quality unpaved roads. A good day would see only 15-20 km travelled with men and animals being dead tired at the end of the day. And if it rained and the roads turned to mud, forget it!
On the other hand, ships are designed to carry large heavy objects such as cannon. With favorable winds, ships of this period can move 15 km PER HOUR. And do it 24 hours of the day.
The same is true of ammunition in this period. It is much, much easier to transport it by sea than by land.
I am an Army veteran. And one of our sayings is, "Amateurs talk about strategy. Professionals talk about logistics." In the period before 1750, the logistics of transporting a gunpowder army and its artillery by sea gave maritime empires an enormous advantage over land-based empires.
Hey Kevin, I agree with you on all counts. It’s during this period (starting 1450) that the power really began to shift to the nations who could handle the seas.
Also, I love the amateur/professional quote. Can you say more about it? Seems like it could apply to more than just the military.
@@heimlershistory Sure! Professionals know that the two key factors in modern armed conflict are logistics and the will of the people to fight.
For example, a one-sentence summary of WWI is, "The Royal Navy starved Germany into submission while an entire generation of European youth killed each other in futile land battles." In November 1918, the German army was undefeated and not a single Allied soldier had set foot on German soil. Yet the people were starving and knew that the Allied logistical superiority made military defeat inevitable. So they lost the will to resist, engaged in a revolution and overthrew the German government.
It is possible to have brilliant strategy, win all of the battles, inflict massive losses upon the enemy, but still lose the war.
For example, the US/Vietnam war. This was largely a logistics war. The USA sought to interdict supply lines, such as the Ho Chi Mihn Trail, and to use chemical defoliants such as Agent Orange to remove the capability of the jungle to supply a secure base area. The actual large-scale battles were all crushing American victories.
A good example of this was the 1968 Tet Offensive. A massive US military victory. Although historians still debate the exact casualty ratio, it was roughly 10:1 in favor of the USA. And yet this decisive military victory was key to US defeat in Vietnam. The problem was, to quote LBJ, "The American people don't care about the 10, they care about the one."
Strategic victory was turned into political defeat by loss of the will of the people to fight. The same can be said of the Soviet Union's military intervention in Afghanistan. WWII was also a logistical war for resources, with the #1 cause of German defeat being lack of oil.
@@heimlershistory heyy you gotta reply to this guy!!
thank you for saving my final exam heart :-)
Ha, you’re welcome!
Learning more here in a video than I learned in a hour longe class...
im naming my first child steve heimler jr
i'm naming mine Maritime
@@kawsarkamal9605 Theres no one more dominant than the homie Maritime Heimler
how about gunpowder and maritime... I bet they'll get along well
@@gamingwithderpsans5706 i was bout to say the same...
HAPPY BIRTHDAY HEIMLER HISTORY!!!🎉🎉🎂🎂🎂
That 1 person that disliked the video needs to be sent to Alcatraz!
Aw thanks...
TO THE GULAG
@@Boeing-ER-jy9vq Ayyy aviation fan
My teacher puts these videos for us to watch, and they help a lot because in our school we have a lot of homework and these videos help a lot. We are starting Units 3.2, 3.3, 3.4.
So glad to hear it. And thanks for letting me know where you are. It helps me keep pace...
Thank you soooo much. I have a test tomorrow, and this such a clutch.
Hope the test went well!
My teacher plays these video and my ap world class is so easy even though I'm bad at studying. Thanks legend!
Thanks so much, I always binge your videos before my tests and they always help! Thanks
binging these before my AP test
love you dude. so grateful for your timing w uploading and the way u present info
i sure having a mari-time with these explanation videos
Notes from the video+ the AMSCO AP World guide, we've got this guys
Maritime empires grew due to factors not primarily relating to gunpowder like the land-based empires
New ideas stemmed from Asian and Islamic ideas
Ship building became easier because there were more accurate records of wind patterns and detailed astronomical charts
lateen sail: triangular sail that could catch the wind on both sides of the ship
some ships combined square and lateen sails, causing the ship to be able to travel far (caravel)
most ships in this time were created in a way where they could be transformed into a warship when needed
ships were very expensive to build & required large crews
These ships included the:
Caravel: Portuguese manufactured, spanish used, smaller ship for navigation
Lateen sails (2-3)
could still carry a lot of cargo.
15th-17th centuries
Fluyt- Dutch, large and built exclusively for trade
had large cargo bays, didn't need large crews, cost to build was 1/2 the cost as many ships @ this time
16th-17th centuries
square, 2-3 masts
Carack- portuguese, biggest, made for only trade
Square and Lateen masts (3-4)
14th-17th
Astrolabe: old sailors how far north or south they were from the equator
Magnetic compass: told sailors which direction they were going in.
Cartography- mapmaking, increased maritime navigation
New Maritime Tech caused a rapid expansion of European trade
Prince Henry the Navigator- financed Portuguese exploration that lead the European world out of Europe
"You got a stew going baby." .......pretty sure only the teachers caught that one. Carl Weathers would be proud. You're the man sir.
Heimler is literally the goat
this is so much better than reading the bentley
this is like reading AMSCO with humor
Well, thank you...
You're a lifesaver. I have my unit exam today
Hope it goes well! Let me know how you did...
HOW DID YOU DO
I always see these comments talking about how youre a life saver
and god dang it you are
bruh you’re the only reason i keep getting A’s on my tests
I like how Heimler leaves an ellipsis every time he replies to comments... he tries to be spooky...
There’s always more to say................
my notes!
maritime - related to the sea
since muslims controlled most of the land and ports that pass through the trade routes, europeans had a difficue establishing trade on their own terms
europeans wanted to know if there was another way to asia
they inherited astrolabe, magnetic compass, lateen sail from the greeks, asians, and muslims.
portugues: created caravel
much smaller
highly navigatable along coastlines and river
fast because of combination of lateen and square sails
can carry a lot of cargo
dutch: fluyt
exclusively for trade
built with large cargo
much smaller crews
Imagine being people from four years ago and not having these videos.
You are like Crash Course but better 🙏
Aw thanks... that’s a huge compliment!
you saved my life
Thanks for the good vid bro
OMG I PASSES MY FINAL THANKS TO YOU!!! AN A IN MY AP!!! THANK YOU SOOO MUCH!!!
I just love how you put a smile on my face with your jokes...
i always see comments about everybody in one place studying for a certain exam... any class of 2026 or 2025 here for the upcoming exam?
me😭
Anyone watching this today (day of the AP Exam)
when you have an AP World final tomorrow so you spam these videos but they actually help
this man saving my grade
He needs more subs, a great teacher
guys please pray that i get a good score on my whap test on wednesday 😭😭😭
Doctor Heimler, you pointed Eastwards. From our perspective
Watching this before my exam at like 11
Hi Steve, keep up the good work. I am starting Unit 4 next week. Any advice on tackling this particular unit?
Unit 4 is kind of a beast. I don’t think I have any particular advice for this unit that wouldn’t apply to any others. Make sure you know the main themes and get down a few specific vocab words to illustrate each theme. For example, the first topic is about technology that helped European exploration. A good illustration of that is the magnetic compass or the lateen sail. I’m not sure how good that advice is, but that’s what I’d do...
Advice taken. Thanks! I look forward to more videos. This is my first time teaching APWH.
0:49 I slapped my computer
Nice
I like your thumbnails
Thanks! I work hard on them...
thank you sensei
You’re welcome, Spicy-san
I have been following ur videos for the past few units and they have been on pace but this unit 4 doesn’t match up with my curriculum? We are currently doing the Atlantic slave trade , Colombian exchange, new world, etc so could u match up to those? also thanks for ur videos they a lifesaver
You’re welcome. This video is Unit 4 Topic 1. I’m working on the ones (also Unit 4) you’re talking about...
People do not know how to appreciate
ur a god
Can you make a unit 4 review for world history
I love u bruh
Love you too, bruh.
Fleet of fluyts sounds like a hardcore metal band to me
tysm :)
In the ultimate review packet, is there sections for each topic or just the units as a whole? I bought the packet and wanted to know so I'm not missing anything.
The URP just has whole unit reviews (5 of which are not on YT). So yeah, you’re not missing anything. Hope it helps!
@@heimlershistory Thank youu!
every single minute i study for APs i want to die
i eat champa rice to swell the ap pain, i suggest you do the same
1/2 as much, almost twice the carrying load.....................................win, win.
Hi Mr. Heimler
I love your videos, and it really helps me prepare for a unit test. But is it info. if you want an A in the class. Should I read the textbook as well and maybe watch crash course. (im too lazy to read the textbook)
Glad you’re finding the video helpful. It’s hard to give the kind of advice you’re looking for, but honestly I’ve never heard of anyone getting an A in an AP class unless they cheated or worked very hard. And I’m not suggesting the former. I would say if you’re not interested in the hard work then just take the B or C in the class. Maybe it’s worth it if you get to do other things you love...
y is he a better teacher than almost all teachers like no cap
I'm blushing...
Question...my daughter bought your the noteguide package for your program. She said that Unit 4 did not match up with what her class was learning in Chapter 4. What text book is this based off of?
unit and chapter are 2 different things
i love the little jokes he keeps in the captions lol
Who else is watching all of these videos before their final
Not me... I’m just making them
Captions at 3:28
I want to cry
0:46 Not the Africans
ight bruh thats too much
33 People disliked because they watched this hours before the exam and got a 2
i love you
This gives me joe scott vibes lol
mr crouch if you see this say hi
I actually thought the maritime joke was pretty funny
That makes two of us...
whos here right before a unit test
cries in ap euro
why did 7 people dislike this video tho
Haters got a hate
pray for my saq 🙏