What ever. ,,, I think she is a great Judge !!! The most trust worthy ever , an. Honest. ... I think the cop , is trying to get away with something .. just a therriouy. Of my thoughts....
The fact that Judge Boyd WANTS to be on RUclips (and scrutinized of course) shows that she’s 100% transparent and impartial. I’m in disbelief right now.
I agree but this doesn't change my opinion of her and her overall being a wonderful judge! She hands down harsh sentences when needed but also believes in giving people chances to get their shi$ together. I do think she had bias in this case to the attorneys and client and did not give a fair and impartial ruling. This was confirmed with the hearing and judge recusing her. As a judge you take the highest oath on bias. She continued bias so I hope this opens her eyes because she really is an amazing judge.
I like Judge Boyd, but she is in the wrong . I believe she is partially motivated by being transparent, but I believe her bigger motivation is elevating her status for political purposes. She has let her personal feelings about this case skew her judgement to the point she began making rulings she knew were at a minimum controversial and out of character with the purpose of harming the defendants in this case. disagree if you like, but it’s pretty compelling when you have former prosecutors that worked for her and the current prosecutor on the case and question, expressing their concerns her judgment in this case.
I used to think so but if you watch the live version you will notice she stops and mutes the cameras when she wants them off. What is transparent about that
@@Jabberjaw99 Judges often mute the camera for sidebar conversations. This happens in the courtroom, too: Judges effectively "mute" themselves by calling the attorneys up to the bench, turning on a pink noise generator, and talking to them out of earshot of the jury, the gallery, the court reporter, etc. It's for off-the-record (but not ex parte) communication about the case. Next step up from there is a chambers conference, which is the exact same thing but in the judge's chambers rather than in open court.
People are meant to he innocent until proven guilty and too many times people watching have already made up their minds instantly and comment their strong opinions
It is not a RUclips SHOW. I have never even seen her address any of us during the streams so he is a LIAR. She is also one of MANY Judges that have RUclips channels and stream their court cases.
Yes ……I’ve only seen Judge Middleton read some of the comments first thing when he starts. Then he turns them off. Judge Fletcher will have Victoria read some ….they giggle. But he never has any disparaging comments. This guy is just butthurt
No other judge involves themselves with their followers, like the flowers and purse thing. It is wrong. There is a level of respect that must be maintained in a courtroom.
Judge Boyd explained why she live streams. There was a violent incident in the neighboring courtroom. Since then only parties to the cases and the lawyers are allowed in her courtroom. But Judge Boyd believes her court should still be open to the public in some form.
Thats fine, and the argument here isn't to stop the streaming. The issue here is the judge is trying to make herself a "star", and in doing so, is acting like a buffoon.
Which is fine, the issue begins when she then changes the way she acts and starts reprimanding people more harshly or for pointless issues to cater to the streams. Streaming isn't under scrutiny here, acting instead of simply judging is under scrutiny.
It's not the youtube streaming that's at issue, it's her alleged change in behavior that's at issue. Plus streaming isn't going to prevent violence at all. It would just be streamed to everyone watching.
How very dare she put her purse by her flowers! 🙄 next thing you know they will try and demand that Judge Fleicher NOT wear a bowtie! While I certainly haven't seen every case in front of her the ones I have seen have shown 0 bias .... sounds like these ppl are just desperate ffs
She is unbias. She also every time when setting conditions asks the person is there anything they need to be successful so she can help them be successful. Her attitude changed because its clear more attorneys and criminals think they can be above the judge and argue every decision. Judge Boyd always takes everything into account and makes the unbiased decisions.
Watching this gave me a very distinct feeling that in years to come, we will lose the transparency we gained from court streams. I can see a supreme court ruling that will put all judges online streams in peril. Ultimately causing the honest judges and referees who choose to continue streaming will be disciplined. I hate the thought of losing connection with judges like Middleton and Fleischer. They are a beacon of wholesome and honest life lessons in practicing their judicial conduct.
Yeah because we’re seeing corruption and other things during different streamed trials and god forbid we see behind the curtain to how things really work and should be concerned about as citizens. Not saying everything is corrupt but it gives insight that a lot of state employees are more concerned with ‘justice’ than truth. Again, not saying that it happening here but hopefully y’all get what I’m saying
I agree I also love Judge Simpson too he's amazing but I do love the other 2 Judges as well and a few others we don't get all this live stream in our Courts in the UK or if we do I haven't found any of them
@@mandyduffin6200 there is one that’s sometimes on early in the morning but I don’t really understand what it is. Check for UK lives around 4-6am eastern time. Not every day but often.
@melissahughes33 hmm 😒 🤔 ok if I go in front of ANY judge because I have a huge bag of weed in my car while pulled over. I live in TexAss, remember, I talk to my attorney BEFORE I go in front of the judge. We agree to ASK the judge AND the prosecutor for a lessened sentence, that I learned my lesson, that I am sorry. The prosecutor wants to pay a fine and spend a year in jail. Remember, TexAss.. ANY.. againI will repeat that, ANY judge has the right to weigh out everything in front of them and then say, "ya know what, no, you are going to do time." Sees. FR LESSON TO THOSE WHO HATE HER: YOU DO THE CRIME YOU DO THE TIME. YOU DON'T HANG OUT WITH THE WRING CROWD, YOU ARE THE WRONG CROWD. PERIOD.
@@tatertotsmomma8246 you are way way way way way way too sensitive. People don't have to like her style just don't watch your channel. You know I've watched some of her live and it's boring and that's okay cuz it's not supposed to be a circus show you know. So calm down 🕊️
There was no bias this is simply good old boys not getting their way and now was to disparage an excellent judge that i have been watching for years and has NEVER done anything but uphold the law. This iis simple BS!!! II feel bias on their end as well as something else at play!!!
It's not so much the comments it the titles that the you tube person put across the top that called looked demeaning to an attorneys pleading in front of judge boyd
Judge Boyd should be able to swear and affirm that she never monitored live chat during a hearing -that would be an intolerable situation for people going before her in court on either side. I'm unsure whether that is what is being alleged here. As to the underlying shooting, in order to have a lawful lethal force situation the suspect would need to have Ability, Opportunity and Officers would need to be in Jeopardy before lethal force would be justified. From the body worn camera's I can't see that the woman had the Ability to harm the officers while she was inside the residence and the Officers were on the back porch -from the BWC's I don't see that there was a third party in Jeopardy inside the residence either. This is one of the quite rare situations where it seems that containment and a callout for mental health crisis workers would have been appropriate.
@@vegasilkitthere wasn't even cause for that officer to try to enter her home to begin with! No warrant, no exigent circumstances, no entry. That case is crazy....those officers look screwed to me.
He's bringing up chat comments from anonymous trolls who had unkind things to say about he and his defense team as if that has anything to do with Judge Boyd. Atty Goss should steer well clear of Twitter if he's so sensitive.
@@AmandaBooBerry He’s obviously got some unresolved issues with insecurity & is threatened by a strong, knowledgeable female who can see through his untruths and deception.
Courts are public. Trials are public. Look at the YSL trial in Georgia, showing a corrupt judge. All trials should be live streamed. They hold people accountable. How's her streaming any different than the news recording trials?!
The officers did a horrible thing. Now, they'll try to pull EVERYONE down with them. Judge Boyd dots all the "I's" and crosses all the "T's". She's in full view to the court AND the country. Pick on someone who's actually done something wrong.
She is problematic and it’s clear she is more concerned with putting on a good show and being tough and domineering than actually helping people to to get rehabilitated. Yes there’s punishment and that’s part of it but some of the sentences she has handed down have been unduly harsh. And I think it’s for the optics. And maybe because her mom enjoys seeing her daughter do it
@@Catten_whisperer I completely disagree. Maybe, watching her more will educate you on just how appropriate her sentences are and that she doesn't come close to being someone who "performs" for anyone or any reason.
@@JR-rx2ke Whatever. 🙄 It's always so predictable that someone with too much time on their hands, has this need to troll comments and "correct" people's opinions. Get a life , hon.
@@lauraa.e.5008I’ve watched her a lot and usually like her, but her conduct in this case was inexplicable and indefensible. I’m not aware of any other cases where both the prosecution and defense both request a continuance in a major felony case for two different compelling reasons and the judge denying it. Especially when the prosecution is saying that there’s crucial evidence that hasn’t yet been processed and can’t be turned over to the defense in time. It’s flat out incomprehensible, and the only reasonable explanation is trying to punish the defense attorney who previously filed an ethics complaint against her for previous alleged misconduct.
Well, in any case, the chances are better that a judgment will not be overturned by an appeals court because the judge was biased. The victim's relatives have a right not to have to go through this trial multiple times just because a judge obviously cannot control her emotions.
Hopefully it backfires the way it appears the Kohberger recusal did. The new judge is not playing with those attorneys and gave them a warning/ verbal spanking this week.
I remember the case when she asked the jury if they knew that lawyer. It wasnt her that wanted to know it was the prosecutor. He saud a member of the jury knew this stand in lawyer and he wanted the case to wait for the defendants main lawyer. So she adked the jury and that was it. He stayed on that hearing. Can anyone pucture her not being fair? The officers are just trying to get out of jail. Thats it.
@@M8keitezer123 have you seen the whole hearing? It get so much worse. I know you only get one side of the story, but I hate all the accusations they make.
Lawyers are loath to testify against a sitting judge. They aren't putting their careers in jeopardy unless they believe a serious beach has occurred. IMO, Judge Boyd LOVE’S her youtube “fame”
I'd like to watch the actual case and how she managed it before I see the second half of this. Do you remember what was called on RUclips by any chance so I could look it up?
I hope they get someone WORSE!! She is fair and Always listens to both sides and more importantly tries to get treatment for those who need it... they are big COWARDS who knows she will send them away for what they did!! Murderers!!
did you ALL somehow miss where both the *prosecutor AND defense* testified that she is not giving them enough time to have a fair trial? It feels like you ALL somehow missed that
The streaming isn't the real issue: that's one attorney's crusade. But from watching this, it is pretty clear that Judge Boyd's often "my way or the highway" attitude (which is often refreshing) has run contrary to the law. Her refusal to allow more time for accurate discovery and a very legitimate FMLA leave is actual evidence of violating the rules of procedure. And while I don't think this is necessarily based in bias against one side or the other, it is not impartial and shows a tone deaf refusal to consider the best interest of the accused. When both the prosecution and the defense are saying they cannot issue a fair trial without more time, and there haven't been unnecessary delays, the judge can't just ignore that for the sake of "I don't do that in my courtroom."
Or maybe they know how biased she is and how ofter she does very very questionable things. Would you trust your life to someone you see doing biased crap? I sure hope not. I sure hope you'd have the backbone to stand up against it.
@Grimm299 is the DA also worried about holding someone accountable? Guessing you missed the part where the DA also testifies in this video - asking to have her removed...womp...womp.....womp....
I disagree. I believe 25% of their toddler tantrums are bc they cannot stand it when a woman in authority puts them in their place. And for a gang that loves to show off and mouth off to one another, they sure become camera shy when it comes to putting them on RUclips for the general population to witness.
Hey, maybe don’t commit crimes in Bexar County…how about that? If criminals are afraid to stand in front of her, I don’t see how that makes her look bad. I think by broadcasting her courtroom she is offering her community complete transparency with regard to her rulings. Bottom line here is don’t find yourself in the position where you are even needing to wonder if Judge Boyd is going to smoke your goofy behind…how about that? It’s sooo simple!!!
Attorney Nisbet at 53:00 is very credible and comes across as genuine. I believe his account of Judge Boyd allowing YT to change her at times. As much as we enjoy watching.....this is people's lives. Also, these attorneys are risking ALOT by testifying. She can make their lives miserable as they work with her on a regular basis and others in a small legal community. The case involved in highly charged, and has significant implications in the community. You can see how much this weighs on each person testifying.
I’ve been watching her for a while now and I’ve seen her biases, especially when it comes to individuals who refer to children as kids. The word “kids” in reference to children has been used in the US as a normal part of speech since the early 1800s. Yet, she has no issue using the word “gay” as a reference to homosexuals, as “gay” in that context has only been around since the 1960s! Gay use to mean happy! I’d love to a linguist call her out! I’ve also seen her show bias against atheists. As evidenced by her mentioning the separation of church and state and never having any issues with requiring people swear to a god while swearing them in!
Unfortunately, I most likely disagree with most of you. I would not want anyone on a jury trial who have this much access to watching a judge’s performance on RUclips. The bias possible is supported by all the comments against this hearing. I would absolutely want these attorneys for my defense. Whether guilty or not, all deserve a fair trial. Most compelling testimony is from former prosecutor, Nesbit working in Judge Boyd, courtroom. Disagree his testimony was speculative. He could be considered an expert witness. These attorneys are protecting their professional licenses. There is very much at stake and this may become case law up before the Supreme Court. If the prosecution and defense agree on too short length of time for discovery etc..then this is compelling that there have been reversible errors made. Hubris is the fall of many otherwise great individuals.
Who paid for the big TV put in her mom's house? I bet tax payers, paid that bill. I really like Judge Boyd too but I think all judges need to be looked at because no one is infallible and power is addictive. Judges have a job to do, but they are not god. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. They should be transparent.
@@debbieunold245 I would be careful what I bet on was bought "by taxpayers money" in a sitting Judge's mother's home. My father was a commissioner and a magistrate, my grandfather was a senior judge. Are you seriously suggesting that we list all items over the cost of a certain amount in our relatives homes, prove ownership with receipts, remove TV's, fridges, cars, groceries etc from an 80 year old lady's home if there is a whisper of a doubt about purchase origin, and sanction everyone involved? Is it okay if my grandfather is retired after 50 years of devoted work, but what about my grandma? Does she warrant a gift from my Dad of a tv? (Ironically I grew up in a country without TV's in the 60s and 70s.) It's not simple, and I actually agree with you. Check out mayor Tiffany Henyard though, from Dolton township, if you really want to follow a case that is corrupt and desperately in need of transparency. Take care, love.🙏🏼🕊🌏💐❤️🩹🫶🏽
I’m speechless! Judge Boyd is one of the most fair, calm judge I’ve seen. So what if she starts her day with levity? It’s a stressful day for everyone, I would think this would help. To say she is bias is ridiculous.
Simply scanning the comments on this video will show that there are reasonable people who think Judge Boyd is biased. That's proof enough to recuse her and she shouldn't have an issue with that if she's truly unbiased. The mere appearance of bias is all that's needed to recuse her, nobody has to prove that bias actually exists. Unfortunately there are a lot of commenters who don't seem to understand that fact.
This is just crap. Judge Boyd is the most fair Judge. And she doesn't give two sh!ts about RUclips. Does she like the fact that a proud mother who worked her entire life to put her daughter through school can see the fruits of her hard work ?? Of course why not. This is men who don't like a woman in the role of anything above them. It's pathetic.
This screams of misogynists and white boy privilege. They got so outraged over being poked fun at that this is the best they can come up with. Also, to infer she's consulting her mother on judicial decisions is so offensive. They'd never accuse a man of any of this behavior. Highlighting the "staging of her handbag and flowers".... Ooof, this is infuriating!
@@peopleincourtso if that is your question, then why do you post her court cases?? If you don't believe in her then I guess it is only for greedy gain. I'm out
Im sorry but, I think this is total 💩! This sounds like they KNOW that she is a NO NONSENSE Judge, as one should be, and they know this will possibly not get the outcome they want. Now, I am only at the middle of this video but I still feel something stinks!
@@falseprophet1024 What nonsense? Allowing court to be public and accessible? Being fair and actually following the law? Telling the truth to people who come before her and need a dose of reality and some guidance they never got from their parents? Holding people accountable for their actions?
I hope those "officers" get an Even HARSHER Judge and that they get Fired, sentenced to life in prison, and Sued by the family... the county and the state as well!!!!!
So the public has the benefit of officers wearing bodycams for many reasons, like holding cops accountable. Judges, lawyers, and criminals should also be held to the same standards. Public court allows the community to gain knowledge of the judicial system and safeguards the public in many ways. I've learned so much by being in Judge Boyd, Simpson, Manning, Stevens, Fleischer, etc. court. What a public injustice if it isn’t allowed. We are the people, we are the state, and we should have access to public information.
I love Judge Boyd but I have often wondered if the posturing with setting a scene so to speak , would not backfire some day. The whole flower /purse thing is lovely, but I find the purse thing wholly strange and pretentious. Who would put a pocketbook in a prominent place in a courtroom where it has no use, no contribution, no relevance to what is being said/done. And, arguably could present a constructive nuisance and/ or distraction. My discipline has been criminal law for almost 15 years and I have never taken my own purse into a court room, and in fact, endeavor to take as few things with me as possible, especially expensive things, wallets, money, electronic devices, etc. if I needed ‘personal’ things with me that would customarily be kept in a purse, I kept them on my person, in a pocket, etc. if I wanted flowers or decoration, I kept them in my office where I was free to enjoy the item in question. This is not a dinner table or even her office. The flowers and a pocketbook, albeit beautiful, do seem incongruous with the purpose, nature and sanctimony of a courtroom. And careful placement of both, in the angle of the camera, are self serving and pretentious and add nothing to the expected decorum and focus of the court.
@@bonniecreighton4163 I was speculating the same thing. I just don’t get why they’re putting it all on the line for these guys. There has to be more to the story. There always is.
Recuse judge. Change the venue. File hundreds of motions. Claim discovery is not satisfied. Then bury relevant and exculpatory information in an avalanche of boxes. Hide exculpatory evidence. Pretend cameras mysteriously "weren't working." Threaten to have prosecution lawyers disbarred. Complain about accoutrement on judges counter. Find voting party affiliation. Violate gag order thru third party. Quash evidence showing cop has numerous previous violent outbursts, beatings, or murders. Quash domestic violence history. Pack courtroom with officers in uniform for intimidation purposes. "Accidentally" reveal juror names to public encouraging harassment, stalking, and threats. The list is endless.
Are you kidding me....she's about the worst Judge on the planet and should be made to step down as judge...she has become an entertainer instead of a judge...she is 100% biased and unfit to serve as a judge...I pray she faces repercussion from the bar and code of conduct...and yes..I 100% believe that judge Boyd's phone conversation with her mom influenced her to change her mind...my question is how could you be so naive to question whether this goes on in her courtroom...you need to wake up and smell the corruption in our judicial system...
@@cinnycin7259totally agree! How can you sit there and say she the fairest judge there is? That's absurd. She's thr first one to degrade someone and she even puts family members of the defendants down, at every chance she gets. She's the worst. I can't stand her.
@@cinnycin7259 Your problem is that you are expecting judicial conduct, but talking to a judge wapner, judy, caprio and joe brown crowd. Comparatively speaking, she's lady justice herself.
I really normally agree with Judge Boyd, and was livid when I first started watching. I thought it was a “good ol’ boy” tactic. After listening to the full testimony, I agree with the judge and his ruling.
After watching this hearing this was the correct ruling. If pressed to proceed without full disclosure and discovery incomplete would be an injustice to the defendants. If convicted there would have had to have another trial.
I stumbled upon the hearing where Judge Boyd was lecturing and chastising an attorney, and I knew nothing about the case beforehand. At the time, however, I wondered just who put the bee in her bonnet, so to speak. I agree with the decision to recuse her from the case in question. I think the fact the prosecutor agreed with the defense made the judges decision easy peasy‼️
I agree with you. Judge Boyd seems to be a fair and wise person to me but the appearance of bias against the defense team in not granting the continuance in such a complex case along with the FMLA issue warrants the recusal. It seemed clear that Boyd, Goss and the British lawyer all had some major problems with each other. The Brit leaving for a pre planned vacation was galling but not allowing extra time to analyze evidence was the kicker. Judge Boyd made a mistake. It has been rectified.
I think the judge here got it right. I love Judge Boyd, but there does seem to be a problem not honoring the attorney's FMLA leave and granting a continuance.
So this coming from someone who likes Judge Boyd I can remember this exact incedint witj this lawyer/team playing out and wondering why she seemed to be even to me as a layman, to be pushing tjrough this case and rudely so not allowing for a continuous oncr I heard the lawyers argument in court. I can remember saying outloud why is she pushing this through so fast. I thought it was fast as when argued their motion so many valid points were made including the fact that it had been leas than a month that the prosecutor on the case had even been assigned and also the fact that the case was only a few months old as I believe its a 2024 case. I further remember it standing out again that she seemed to have a problem with this lawyer. I thought that due to her not just denying his continuance motion for family leave with a wife due to delivery shortly, but specifically her comment and suggestion that basically if he didnt like that ruling that his CLIENT could always sever his case from the other two! Part of what made that so blatantly wrong was thinking that she's been a defense attorney herself and such a suggestion to change a clients entire trial strategy due to his family leave time like a ludicrous suggestion and I was like what's going on here?!? Thank you to the channel moderator for not putting the outcome of this hearing in the title of the video.
I love Judge Boyd but I agree that if both parties needed more time, particularly with potential Brady evidence, continuation should have been granted.
Considering the prosecutor agrees, I would agree that it is a bad idea to go ahead. It would be unjust to rush something this big - for the victim’s family more than anyone else. Whoever did it should be found guilty the right way
This is zealous defense, which is a good thing. But. I do think it stems from this lawyer's personal feelings about Judge Boyd, combined with the larger defense team's desire not to have this trial livestreamed. And of course the elephant in the room is a bunch of Texan white guys vs. a Black woman in a position of power, which I'll willingly admit may not be anyone's primary or even conscious motivation, but it plays in the background, regardless.
How do you make this about race? Both prosecution and defense say they are not ready for trial. Multiple queries regarding how often a motion for continuance being denied indicate this is an oddity in their experience. I would say that the "elephant in the room" mostly hangs out in your subconscious and it certainly gets fed there.
Watched the whole thing and it seems like Boyd was in the wrong here. Happens to the best of us. Hopefully she'll recognize that and walk it off. This is why checks and balances exist! Judges are human.
I like Judge Boyd, however I think it’s always a good thing for all judges to have a review of their performance, at least once in their career as a judge. Judges have a position of considerable power. I believe, as you say she will recognize this and continue to be a fair and just judge.
So here’s the thing- then she berates and belittles the defendant
Месяц назад+17
I don’t get why Judge Boyd didn’t just recuse herself. Why did she let it get to this point? Just the appearance of a bias is enough to have a judge recuse themselves, let alone an actual bias.
Because she did nothing wrong and they are trying to recuse her because she will not tolerate their bs stories and excuses. If they are guilty she will send them to jail. They know it. They want an easier judge not a fair judge. 💯
I did watch this incident on a channel a few weeks back. At the time I agreed that she was being hard on the attorneys. Knowing that you will have 3 defendants and all of the attorneys and their staff, what would be so wrong in moving courtrooms? Right to a speedy trial is a real thing, but you are purposefully forcing the prosecution and defense to go to trial when they said they were not ready. Shame on Boyd!
Ruling to have her recused ensures in theory that no one can complain about bias. I think this judge is trying to protect Judge Boyd too. We’ll see how this turns out for those who are complaining!
I'm very torn on this. I like Judge Boyd, but I saw one of the cases that they brought up, not the murder, and she seemed very biased. It was really surprising because I am used to her being fair and on the other hand murderous cops are the worst scourge of the justice system. Funny how they complain about Boyd having a big screen, but they are happy to use one for their case.
I think it’s a testament to Judge Boyd’s ethics that she is showing true court cases and what is done via the court system and her sound judgment and advice.
@@annied8161 I'm like oh no not the umbrella ☔story again ☔. The best drive scene in Texas is Honorable John Stevens Jr., Jefferson county Best judge this side of heaven 🕊️💕
Here we go again with a deminstration of "The Goid Old Boys Club" this defense team will say and do anything to maline the reputation and character of Judge Boyd, if it means their slime ball clients get away with killing someone in their own home. This defense team will most likely end up with a Judge out of their "club" who won't hold tbese slime balls accountable or be fair. I hope and pray there will be justice for this victim and her family
I agree..they don't get there way and they see respect and her reputation growing and jealousy is just ugly...shame on them..we should knw what's going on in court rooms
Umm...did you watch the video, including the clips of the judges behavior? Obviously not cause the only person who looks bad here, or like a slim ball is Judge Boyd.
LOL - just got to the part where Judge Boyd actually walks into this court proceeding, again talk about scumbag behavior - the real Judge had to tell her to leave. Thinking she should probably be disbarred.
@@Copewatcher3422 SERIOULY!! Judge Boyd, is one of the finest Judges I have ever heard!! This defense team wanted her removed because they want to get their slime ball clients off for killing this lady on VIDEO IN HER OWN HOME!!
The judge hearing this motion is well versed in the law. It seems that Judge Boyd should have granted the continuance. That was based on the law. It is concerning that the denial by Judge Boyd appears to have been contrary to the law. The appearance of bias is evident by testimony of the witnesses on both sides of the case. Even the appearance of wrongdoing is something to avoid.
I’m usually a fan, but her rulings in this case were inexcusable and they were 100% right to recuse her. The idea that both the prosecution and defense could jointly request a continuance for extremely valid reasons and have it denied without explanation is insane. Especially when the prosecution is saying they won’t be able to turn over important discovery in time for the trial. If they were convicted it would be immediately reversed on appeal.
It also sounds like she wanted to proceed because it was taking soo (too) long. What happened to speedy trials? Why should the victims not also get justice in a timely manner?
IMO Judge Boyd was wrong for telling them they will have multiple people on trial with multiple lawyers each and they have to all sit at the tiny table because she said so.
Yes, she should have checked with the court administrator before making that statement. The other option would be temporarily removing part of the public seating and providing more space for the defense teams.
Believe it👍 She is being removed by the superior judge because both sides testified that she is NOT GIVING THEM ENOUGH TIME TO HAVE A FAIR TRIAL. In addition, she's not letting the lead attorney speak and she refused his FMLA request. She obviously has a personal issue that isn't allowing her to see this case clearly. Dont believe it. It's still true👍
This law firm constantly plays games. The Attny of record doesn't show up and they send a substitute. Yet they can never seem to get coverage during their "Non-refundable" vacations and family leaves. They're so arrogant.
I stopped watching Judge Boyd after a few views. I don’t like her purposely displayed handbags. In my opinion that in itself is a play to the cameras and to make herself memorable amongst the other judge channels. Inappropriate for the seriousness of the courts. That being said, if these attorneys are stating facts, and I don’t know if they are or not, she earned the recusal. Her alleged behavior is questionable at best and egregious at worst thus giving a clear appearance of impropriety.
I agree, I am in favor of openness and transparency, but a court should be an exercise of the law, and not a performance. Cameras seem to inevitably draw out performative elements from people, which is different to having public or reporters in court watching the proceeding. There does seem to be a correlation between how much judges welcome media in the court vs how "performative" the judge is.
@@Nikalette100 Maybe in texas but this is a state-by-state thing. I don't think she's done anything wrong - she gets to run her court room as she wants, and they gotta play the game.
OMG i LOVE ❤️ Judge Boyd!!!!! She is the most unbiased and honest judge I have watched on a regular basis-every day i watch her court and i have never seen her move people like the attorneys are claiming only times i see her moving people around is for the DA or the defendants attorney to the appropriate places that they always stand and as for the court reporter-she can’t do her job unless she can hear the words to put on the record and the box that the people in custody are sitting is close to the reporter and they talk to their attorneys at this time and they get louder and it messes up the record! -no record or nothing on the record is a big problem because then you have no idea what happened in court with the case!
@@melonioilar8569 You have to follow the law that makes you unbiased but she's not a totally unbiased human ... Her robe is a cloak. She has slipped a few times and her real thoughts are spoken, a oops moment maybe
That is the correct view! It's not so much as she's trying to be above the law but that the Judge in this matter is trying to maintain the public trust that all proceedings are impartial.
@@bekahhooper9852 it was hard to watch. I stopped half way through the first time but then I realized I needed to hear everything they have to say. I like her. I didn’t want to be ignorant as to what’s going on. Judges sometimes get recused and over turned. I’m not mad about that. Maybe she doesn’t like the guy and can’t be impartial, I’m not even mad about that. I’m mad at how they go after her streaming and how they paint all content creators with an unflattering brush. It’s unfair and not cool. But that’s what lawyers do. It’s their job. The facts of the case they have to try are bad for their clients. I’m sure there are local politics I can’t even begin to understand at stake. But ffs, the last thing we need is fewer court streaming. They should all be streaming. It’s 2024. The vast majority of people can’t go live to courtrooms around the county to see what’s going on. We can’t trust the mainstream media to cover things like this with accuracy. The public needs to be allowed to see Justice.
This is absolute BULLSH.. Noway did Judge Boyd change her mind about ruling on a probation revocation case because of influence from Zoom watchers. She might be relieved to have another Judge preside over this case and not deal with this nastiness.
- Doesn't look good for Boyd that she knows her mom watches her (she mentions her mom A LOT in her rulings). I would worry she was oerforming for her mother. - Why did Judge Boyd enter the courtroom during these proceedings?! Was that as strange as I thought it was?!
Is nobody listening. She refused to let a man take his FMLA, that is a federal offense. She would not let an attorney speak objections and defend his client, a violation of his clients rights. If I was accused of a crime and acquitted and then all of the RUclips videos on the judges web site still make me look guilty I would be pissed. Why would she come into the court room during these proceedings then give the Judge a wait one minute gesture? She knows she can't be in the court room. No one finds that to be fishy and rude? I enjoy watching Judge Boyd as well however people have the right to file for a recusal.
She didn't refuse to let him do anything, other than delay a huge case. She didn't say he couldn't have his convenient fmla at all. So how do you figure she refused to let him take it?
@@JordanEmede_376She made the defendant choose between his attorney or a joint defense without explanation. “Delay” isn’t accurate here, since the trial is way ahead of schedule. There hasn’t been a single continuance yet, and the prosecutors haven’t even had time to review the evidence and provide it to the defense in time. It’s insane. A first continuance is granted automatically in major cases even without a reason, and usually more after that. No one is aware of any judge anywhere denying a continuance for FMLA, and it would be unthinkable to any judge in America to deny a continuance when both the prosecution and defense come together to say they need more time just to comply with their basic ethical obligations and the defendants’ constitutional rights.
Let me start by saying that what those officers did was absolutely tragic and horrible and should be absolutely punished. But, I'm also a very fair and reasonable person and that is no excuse to treat their lawyers the way she is. Those defendants have rights and she is violating them in very indirect ways via the attorneys. And, to walk in the courtroom without warning during testimony on her recusal hearing is showing blatant disrespect and outright egregious behavior to not only those attorneys but as well as the judge who will undoubtedly view that negatively. The nerve of her to feel she could do that is evidence that those lawyers may actually have a point. Also, to have a former AND current prosecutor testify is very validating to the bias accusations. Hearing that she is leaving cases online of people's whose records have been expunged is a GIANT NO NO! That is absolutely a violation of laws and rights.
I don’t think that’s a violation. Should ever travel of OJ Simpson Trial be removed? Rittenhouse? If I was tried and found innocent I would want full record of the state NOT proving their case. Should NBC, ABC, CNN etc scrub their news footage and delete all records of anyone they reported on being accused? That’s silly.
Месяц назад+37
I like watching Boyd, but the blind loyalty for Boyd in here is ridiculous.
People will see what they want. I think it depends on the kind of court watcher you are. I agree with the judges decision. I think the whole RUclips part is unnecessary and added nothing. She made a bad call. I think she maybe does dislike these lawyers. Even the judge said the RUclips thing was irrelevant and he was going on the facts of this case.
it is not blind loyalty but an earned respect for the judge. we see her being fair. we see her not letting people get out of control or being disrespectful to the court. we see her routinely offer available services to benefit prisoners and break their losing cycles.
But like i said, she's only human, even she has made mistakes,i know judges aren't supposed to, and im not saying her mistakes have anything to do with her rulings, and they shouldn't,but it does happen, ( like when she makes statements about her mom or something of that nature, a judge has to be careful about those kinds of things).
@@susanengel-ix8bl this is true. my memory tells me the judge often shares down to earth advice, many times off the record. people who werent lucky enough to grow up in a caring, moral household benefit from that. i retired from DCF. having a moral counterpoint to reference is a gift.
How is Judge Boyd responsible for what a content creator says or titles their videos? This is ridicules. I bet if the title said, Defense attorney slams Judge Boyd and his client walks, he wouldn't bring it up. Lawyers are always trying to find a loophole. To accuse her of not accepting a plea deal because her mother said she shouldn't is absurd. That's defamation.
The issue is not necessarily streaming, its more about not allowing a continuance when both sides knew there was evidence out there that hasn’t been processed. I think 🤦♂️
Just finished - after hearing the prosecutor testify, I do agree with the Judge’s decision here. It appears that was the factor that changed his mind. Not that Judge Boyd had any personal animus, but that she was rushing it to trial. Great video!!!!!
They’re upset because their precious egos got hurt by a strong female judge who likes to display her bag and floral arrangements. That’s basically what it comes down to lol
@@siiiiiuu7 I guess I need to go look for the purse and flowers that I have missed seeing. I pretty much concentrate on the people. Decorations don't sway me one way or the other.
If I am arguing the right to view, it is free speech. It is LESS damaging to someone's guilt than a bodycam. 🎉 So, let's hear it for transparency! 🎉 I also disagree that the Supreme Court is NOT live video streamed. We should be free to watch that too. ❤
I have no problem with live streaming in the courtroom. I have watched Judge boyd for a while now. I felt even before this issue that she sees herself as Judge Judy. The purse in her background.the flowers every day. Looks like a TV show. Tell me of another judge to make a point to show an extensive collections of handbags. So why not allow judges to display classic cars in the courtroom or golf clubs or designer suits in the courtroom How about curtains and throw pillows. Judge Boyd is out to promote judge boyd.
Next time you watch one of her probations conditions cases count how many conditions she puts on them and how much time they take. I counted 11 on one case and knew there was no way they would not violate. They did and ended up serving the time anyway but all her programs got those state funds. I am in Texas and if I ever have to go before her I will not waste my time or the states money and just do the time. I laugh everything she askes is there anything the court can do to to help you be successful. I'm like yeah map out those conditions on a calendar and you will see there are not enough hours in a week to keep a 40 hr. job and meet the 5-10 other conditions.
I am thinking witch hunt. A woman, moreover, a black female judge…. I have watched her in many hearings and have always seen an unapologetic adherence to the law on her part.
@@lauramcadam5751 you literally just watched it. Did you not just watch BOTH SIDES testify that Boyd is NOT GIVING THEM ENOUGH TIME TO HAVE A FAIR TRIAL? This is likely a first-ever in Texas litigation. Y'all are delusional or just uneducated if you don't see what she's doing wrong
Ok I don’t think people know what’s goin on with the judge. She rushed to set the trial date. BOTH the defense AND prosecution asked for more time because they needed to gather more evidence. She said no. The reason? One of the lawyers on the defense team filed a motion about a year back that said her live streaming RUclips showing his clients face, who was not found guilty AND had no record, is against the law. So what did the judge do?? Make his life hell. So yes she should be recused.
@@maryturula7620 when both defense and prosecution ask for more time its ALWAYS given. That’s why she’s recused. Because an appellate judge looked at all the facts and concluded she wasn’t fair and needed to be recused. Point blank.
@@maryturula7620 she’s also biased due to the fact the lawyer on the defense has a past history with her. That’s why she’s recused. There is evidence that she’s biased which is why she was removed from the case
Courts are public, and all should be on camera at all times as a matter of the constitution. Nevada has it right: the default is that the media is involved whenever they want to be, and it must be extraordinary to deny them. RUclips is just another way we can hold our public officials accountable and to be frank I think they are over blowing a lot of her conduct as well as misconstruing things in the light most negative, but she definitely is someone I find unreasonable on a regular basis. I know that is blasphemy to law tube, but her and Judge Bryant have always left bad taste in my mouth. Their behavior has always bothered me. Bryant way more than Boyd, though. Courts need to be on RUclips, but judges need to treat it like what it is: just another face in the crowd. That said, those people dont get to use our right to an open court and the commentary of the public as a way to escape scrutiny.
I've found her unreasonable at times too. I've also thought she gives way too harsh sentences, but that can be personal opinion. I wonder if part of her and Judge Bryant's persona is that, because they are African American and women, they've had to work MUCH harder to get to the positions they are in. Possibly this has some bases in their courtroom demeanor. It just is what it is.
Interesting Can't even lie... Her videos were kind of entertaining but hearing this and finding out that she's basically doing that purposefully....? There's a time and place, a judge in the courtroom shouldn't be operating with entertainment in mind.
I love Judge Boyd, but with that being said, after hearing everything….i agree with this Judge’s decision. This is a very complex case and cannot be rushed. Even the Prosecutor agreed.
@@luvmyshihtzus7327 I agree. I thought it sounded unreasonably harsh when she denied it before any of this happened. I knew she’d been recused before but I didn’t connect that with these particular lawyers.
This is ridiculous. This lawyer has an ego that occupies the entire room. I wonder how capable is this lawyer. This is a very capable female judge and is not a part of the good o’ boy club.
Watch Boyd‘s behavior is often grossly inappropriate and offensive. Infuriates me when she tells a woman that her eyelashes are too long. I have lots of opinions about her hair and I don’t say any of them. I’m glad to see some accountability. Any conviction to be had will be tainted if it comes from her court. Let’s not have that shall we.
She's an effective, fantastic Judge. She actually makes sure that people who commit crimes pay the time! She keeps her community safe! Petty defense lawyers!
If she makes sure people pay for their crimes and because of her conduct they are released back into the streets to commit more crimes. What good is that doing?
I'm confused. Her live streams don't allow live chat, not that I've ever seen anyway. It just streams the court proceedings live as far as I'm aware. To me there's no difference to someone forming an opinion about someone in court if they were attending live than if they were watching it on a stream. Judge Boyd is always fair and bases her decisions on the evidence presented, any previous criminal activity and their compliance with her rulings, probation etc. How on earth does streaming the courtroom affect that?
One of the other comments, for what it's worth (as we don't know the factual basis) is that the chat feature had been turned off some time ago -which would indicate that it was at one time active.
When I saw the hearing, I was surprised that she wouldn't grant a continuance, especially because it was a first request and the issues (expert unavailable and discovery not complete) are reasonable grounds.
The expert they wanted couldn’t be available for several months and they didn’t want to get a different one so this is how they get their way! They cry about the Judge being bias-presto here we are months later when we get to prolong the time and get our expert! Pretty underhanded but sad to drag the innocent Judge down this path because you didn’t get the right ruling!
@@melonioilar8569The prosecution lodged the similar complaint. This Judge clearly was being difficult and passive aggressive. She was removed because she deserved removing.
I think the prosecutor who was subpoenaed was extremely eloquent as to the reasons for a continuance. I love Judge Boyd, and Goss skewerd the truth, about the trial he whinged about, I watched it but I think it much better that a different Judge and a continuance will favour the Prosecution and all this fuss by the defence has damaged thier case which is all to the better. Anew trial will not be option even though an appeal can be admitted. The video of those 'peace' cops is damning and horrendous. I'm sure they will all go down. To break into the victim's house and murder her with 16 shots fired is unconscionable and unforgivable.
Ok, i just started this, and I'm already mad. Okay, take her off youtube she's still going to be the same fair, unbiased, caring judge. She's still going to be Honorable Judge Boyd
I didnt realize this channel is Judge Boyd's. The content should belong to the county/govt not the judge. If a judge is making money from court content, then their is a greater possibility of partiality and in the extreme...corruption.
WOW! I’m so glad she got kicked off this trial because she’s extremely rude and arrogant. She literally behaves like a queen, not a judge. I’ve never understood why anyone likes her so much because they certainly wouldn’t if they or their own family were subject to her attitude of disdain.
Their referencing one case out of thousands! Do they know what exactly she spoke to her mom about...NO they do not. They're reaching and I mean reaching!! This is just shameful these officers and attorneys believe they will have a better outcome from a Judge that isn't as strict as Honorable Judge Boyd!
Judge Boyd is very popular but she isn't the only judge that is live on RUclips. An unbiassed judge is essential in any trial.
We just learned from this hearing the Supreme Court may be taking up zoom court. They want us to be blind and ignorant for higher pay and profit.
🎯🎯🎯
Absolutely.
I disagree with you taints there judge and The jury!
They should show cases after they r over
What ever. ,,, I think she is a great Judge !!! The most trust worthy ever , an. Honest. ... I think the cop , is trying to get away with something .. just a therriouy. Of my thoughts....
But yet this is streamed hmmmm funny how that works.
I was afraid there were no critical thinkers left. Thank you
Right? 😂
And presided with the judge who does not review RUclips comments during hearings
I was just thinking this.
Who reviews comments during court??? Please tell i would LOVE to know!!
The fact that Judge Boyd WANTS to be on RUclips (and scrutinized of course) shows that she’s 100% transparent and impartial. I’m in disbelief right now.
I agree but this doesn't change my opinion of her and her overall being a wonderful judge! She hands down harsh sentences when needed but also believes in giving people chances to get their shi$ together.
I do think she had bias in this case to the attorneys and client and did not give a fair and impartial ruling. This was confirmed with the hearing and judge recusing her. As a judge you take the highest oath on bias. She continued bias so I hope this opens her eyes because she really is an amazing judge.
I like Judge Boyd, but she is in the wrong . I believe she is partially motivated by being transparent, but I believe her bigger motivation is elevating her status for political purposes. She has let her personal feelings about this case skew her judgement to the point she began making rulings she knew were at a minimum controversial and out of character with the purpose of harming the defendants in this case. disagree if you like, but it’s pretty compelling when you have former prosecutors that worked for her and the current prosecutor on the case and question, expressing their concerns her judgment in this case.
I used to think so but if you watch the live version you will notice she stops and mutes the cameras when she wants them off. What is transparent about that
@@Jabberjaw99 Judges often mute the camera for sidebar conversations. This happens in the courtroom, too: Judges effectively "mute" themselves by calling the attorneys up to the bench, turning on a pink noise generator, and talking to them out of earshot of the jury, the gallery, the court reporter, etc. It's for off-the-record (but not ex parte) communication about the case. Next step up from there is a chambers conference, which is the exact same thing but in the judge's chambers rather than in open court.
@kmore2785 I'm not referring to sidebars
Every court case should be aired on YT or its equivalent.
I agree, if it's a fair trial that shouldn't even be an issue.
People are meant to he innocent until proven guilty and too many times people watching have already made up their minds instantly and comment their strong opinions
@@vampy5071 Something easily handled by not allowing live comments.
@@vampy5071 so what? Let's debate v hate!
It is not a RUclips SHOW. I have never even seen her address any of us during the streams so he is a LIAR. She is also one of MANY Judges that have RUclips channels and stream their court cases.
EXACTLY! ❤
It's not show business it's a court of Law Slimey Attorney trying to get low life's off the responsibility for their actions.
Yes ……I’ve only seen Judge Middleton read some of the comments first thing when he starts. Then he turns them off. Judge Fletcher will have Victoria read some ….they giggle. But he never has any disparaging comments. This guy is just butthurt
No other judge involves themselves with their followers, like the flowers and purse thing. It is wrong. There is a level of respect that must be maintained in a courtroom.
@@ann316the first case I saw she already had the flowers. Hasn’t added them for RUclips.
Judge Boyd explained why she live streams.
There was a violent incident in the neighboring courtroom.
Since then only parties to the cases and the lawyers are allowed in her courtroom.
But Judge Boyd believes her court should still be open to the public in some form.
Yes, exactly!! We need streaming!
Thats fine, and the argument here isn't to stop the streaming. The issue here is the judge is trying to make herself a "star", and in doing so, is acting like a buffoon.
@bunyz9728 no one is arguing for stopping the steeaming.
Which is fine, the issue begins when she then changes the way she acts and starts reprimanding people more harshly or for pointless issues to cater to the streams.
Streaming isn't under scrutiny here, acting instead of simply judging is under scrutiny.
It's not the youtube streaming that's at issue, it's her alleged change in behavior that's at issue. Plus streaming isn't going to prevent violence at all. It would just be streamed to everyone watching.
How very dare she put her purse by her flowers! 🙄 next thing you know they will try and demand that Judge Fleicher NOT wear a bowtie! While I certainly haven't seen every case in front of her the ones I have seen have shown 0 bias .... sounds like these ppl are just desperate ffs
🎉
She is unbias. She also every time when setting conditions asks the person is there anything they need to be successful so she can help them be successful. Her attitude changed because its clear more attorneys and criminals think they can be above the judge and argue every decision.
Judge Boyd always takes everything into account and makes the unbiased decisions.
Take your blinders off
For everyone saying they just want her recused because they are hoping for a different outcome, then why does the prosecutor want her recused?
I agree 1000000%
Watching this gave me a very distinct feeling that in years to come, we will lose the transparency we gained from court streams.
I can see a supreme court ruling that will put all judges online streams in peril. Ultimately causing the honest judges and referees who choose to continue streaming will be disciplined.
I hate the thought of losing connection with judges like Middleton and Fleischer. They are a beacon of wholesome and honest life lessons in practicing their judicial conduct.
My thoughts exactly!
Yeah because we’re seeing corruption and other things during different streamed trials and god forbid we see behind the curtain to how things really work and should be concerned about as citizens. Not saying everything is corrupt but it gives insight that a lot of state employees are more concerned with ‘justice’ than truth. Again, not saying that it happening here but hopefully y’all get what I’m saying
I agree I also love Judge Simpson too he's amazing but I do love the other 2 Judges as well and a few others we don't get all this live stream in our Courts in the UK or if we do I haven't found any of them
Couldn’t have said it better myself.
@@mandyduffin6200 there is one that’s sometimes on early in the morning but I don’t really understand what it is. Check for UK lives around 4-6am eastern time. Not every day but often.
Haters. This Judge is wonderful and she is NOT bias. She wants a safe community, period.
STOP HATE AND UNITE WITH LOVE AND COMPASSION ❤️
Bullshit
@@tatertotsmomma8246 how is denying both the defense and the prosecutor a needed continuance not bias? Even the judge agreed.
@melissahughes33 hmm 😒 🤔 ok if I go in front of ANY judge because I have a huge bag of weed in my car while pulled over. I live in TexAss, remember, I talk to my attorney BEFORE I go in front of the judge.
We agree to ASK the judge AND the prosecutor for a lessened sentence, that I learned my lesson, that I am sorry.
The prosecutor wants to pay a fine and spend a year in jail.
Remember, TexAss..
ANY.. againI will repeat that, ANY judge has the right to weigh out everything in front of them and then say, "ya know what, no, you are going to do time."
Sees. FR
LESSON TO THOSE WHO HATE HER:
YOU DO THE CRIME YOU DO THE TIME. YOU DON'T HANG OUT WITH THE WRING CROWD, YOU ARE THE WRONG CROWD. PERIOD.
@@tatertotsmomma8246 this doesn't even make sense. There was no trial yet. Are you even aware what this is about?
@@tatertotsmomma8246 you are way way way way way way too sensitive. People don't have to like her style just don't watch your channel. You know I've watched some of her live and it's boring and that's okay cuz it's not supposed to be a circus show you know.
So calm down 🕊️
There was no bias this is simply good old boys not getting their way and now was to disparage an excellent judge that i have been watching for years and has NEVER done anything but uphold the law. This iis simple BS!!! II feel bias on their end as well as something else at play!!!
👍👍👍
I disagree, the things they were asking for were not unattainable.
If the prosecutor also wants her off the case, there's something wrong! 😱
Did you watch the video?
@@MrBollocks10often times the prosecutor are in cahoots with the police. Very often with dirty police.
@@MrBollocks10 except BOTH sides is saying she is biased
Judge Boyd turned off comments to her streams months and months ago.
ITF you don't have any haters , you must be doing something wrong. Everyone has haters.
@@Collageartist69Like you???
It's not so much the comments it the titles that the you tube person put across the top that called looked demeaning to an attorneys pleading in front of judge boyd
Was judge boyd in court for this hearing?
@@megmeyer7563no she wasn't, but at one point she walks into the back door to speak to someone and is asked to leave by the judge
Im sorry did they seriously push their power around because Boyd actually tried to hold their asses accountable for what they did?
Looks like it
Judge Boyd should be able to swear and affirm that she never monitored live chat during a hearing -that would be an intolerable situation for people going before her in court on either side. I'm unsure whether that is what is being alleged here.
As to the underlying shooting, in order to have a lawful lethal force situation the suspect would need to have Ability, Opportunity and Officers would need to be in Jeopardy before lethal force would be justified. From the body worn camera's I can't see that the woman had the Ability to harm the officers while she was inside the residence and the Officers were on the back porch -from the BWC's I don't see that there was a third party in Jeopardy inside the residence either.
This is one of the quite rare situations where it seems that containment and a callout for mental health crisis workers would have been appropriate.
@@vegasilkitthere wasn't even cause for that officer to try to enter her home to begin with! No warrant, no exigent circumstances, no entry. That case is crazy....those officers look screwed to me.
Held them accountable for what they did? Are you speaking about something they did specifically or in general terms?
Well, maybe just do away with the trial then, right?
He's bringing up chat comments from anonymous trolls who had unkind things to say about he and his defense team as if that has anything to do with Judge Boyd. Atty Goss should steer well clear of Twitter if he's so sensitive.
@@AmandaBooBerry oh yeah, I forgot about Twitter.
@@AmandaBooBerry He’s obviously got some unresolved issues with insecurity & is threatened by a strong, knowledgeable female who can see through his untruths and deception.
Courts are public. Trials are public. Look at the YSL trial in Georgia, showing a corrupt judge. All trials should be live streamed. They hold people accountable.
How's her streaming any different than the news recording trials?!
@@amirandamichelle EXACTLY ❤️❤️❤️
@@billiep4338did you somehow mess where both the prosecutor and defense testify that she is not giving them enough time to happy fair trial?
Thank God for the crime channels on YT that sparked an interest in SO MANY people with a passion for the judicial system! I have learned SO MUCH!
The officers did a horrible thing. Now, they'll try to pull EVERYONE down with them. Judge Boyd dots all the "I's" and crosses all the "T's". She's in full view to the court AND the country. Pick on someone who's actually done something wrong.
She is problematic and it’s clear she is more concerned with putting on a good show and being tough and domineering than actually helping people to to get rehabilitated. Yes there’s punishment and that’s part of it but some of the sentences she has handed down have been unduly harsh. And I think it’s for the optics. And maybe because her mom enjoys seeing her daughter do it
@@Catten_whisperer I completely disagree. Maybe, watching her more will educate you on just how appropriate her sentences are and that she doesn't come close to being someone who "performs" for anyone or any reason.
You mean the officers have been ACCUSED, as opposed to CONVICTED, of doing a horrible thing. RIGHT?
@@JR-rx2ke Whatever. 🙄 It's always so predictable that someone with too much time on their hands, has this need to troll comments and "correct" people's opinions. Get a life , hon.
@@lauraa.e.5008I’ve watched her a lot and usually like her, but her conduct in this case was inexplicable and indefensible.
I’m not aware of any other cases where both the prosecution and defense both request a continuance in a major felony case for two different compelling reasons and the judge denying it.
Especially when the prosecution is saying that there’s crucial evidence that hasn’t yet been processed and can’t be turned over to the defense in time. It’s flat out incomprehensible, and the only reasonable explanation is trying to punish the defense attorney who previously filed an ethics complaint against her for previous alleged misconduct.
They feel by having her recused, they'll have a better chance. Hmmm, we'll see.
Of course it's all for their benefit. We all know how that works but she gave them ammunition to do exactly what they are doing.
It's not like the judge tries the case...
I think the matter in contention is the rush to trial with both parties saying that they are not ready.
Well, in any case, the chances are better that a judgment will not be overturned by an appeals court because the judge was biased. The victim's relatives have a right not to have to go through this trial multiple times just because a judge obviously cannot control her emotions.
Hopefully it backfires the way it appears the Kohberger recusal did. The new judge is not playing with those attorneys and gave them a warning/ verbal spanking this week.
I remember the case when she asked the jury if they knew that lawyer. It wasnt her that wanted to know it was the prosecutor. He saud a member of the jury knew this stand in lawyer and he wanted the case to wait for the defendants main lawyer. So she adked the jury and that was it. He stayed on that hearing. Can anyone pucture her not being fair? The officers are just trying to get out of jail. Thats it.
@@M8keitezer123 have you seen the whole hearing? It get so much worse. I know you only get one side of the story, but I hate all the accusations they make.
What was the name of the trial
Lawyers are loath to testify against a sitting judge. They aren't putting their careers in jeopardy unless they believe a serious beach has occurred. IMO, Judge Boyd LOVE’S her youtube “fame”
I'd like to watch the actual case and how she managed it before I see the second half of this. Do you remember what was called on RUclips by any chance so I could look it up?
@@heidikickhouse- the trial or the one with the officers?
Omg this is bs they killed someone on purpose and she was gonna send them to prison so they want a different judge 🤦🏼♀️
It sounds to me like Judge Boyd is not giving this lawyer special treatments and he's pissed off . He is not getting his way in her court room !
That's your actual take on things after both the defense and prosecution say they are not ready for trial?
I hope they get someone WORSE!! She is fair and Always listens to both sides and more importantly tries to get treatment for those who need it... they are big COWARDS who knows she will send them away for what they did!! Murderers!!
did you ALL somehow miss where both the *prosecutor AND defense* testified that she is not giving them enough time to have a fair trial?
It feels like you ALL somehow missed that
You know how long this case has been pending? @FattyMateo
The streaming isn't the real issue: that's one attorney's crusade. But from watching this, it is pretty clear that Judge Boyd's often "my way or the highway" attitude (which is often refreshing) has run contrary to the law. Her refusal to allow more time for accurate discovery and a very legitimate FMLA leave is actual evidence of violating the rules of procedure. And while I don't think this is necessarily based in bias against one side or the other, it is not impartial and shows a tone deaf refusal to consider the best interest of the accused. When both the prosecution and the defense are saying they cannot issue a fair trial without more time, and there haven't been unnecessary delays, the judge can't just ignore that for the sake of "I don't do that in my courtroom."
Bottom line: they are trying to avoid being in her court as they do not want their antics to be live on RUclips
@@huatimah
What are the antic's
your referring to?🪴
Except our trials are open to the public. Recording should be done to ensure a transparent court process and fair proceedings.
I agree 👍
Or maybe they know how biased she is and how ofter she does very very questionable things. Would you trust your life to someone you see doing biased crap? I sure hope not. I sure hope you'd have the backbone to stand up against it.
Looser lawyers bittter
Y'all need to leave judge Boyd alone. That lady is by the book.
Nothing wrong with transparency and accountability. These are experienced lawyers and former judges/prosecutors bringing these accusations.
You just say that bc you’re stuck up her a$$hole
judge Boyd needs transparency and accountability
@@jackyluuu7384Sooo you drink the coolaid as well huh? You watch her court streaming and you feel she isn't transparent...good grief
Obviously not.
So, being held accountable and demanding respect in the courts is now bias?! Get out and leave our Judge alone!! 😠 😡
Did you somehow miss where BOTH SIDES AGREED that she isn't giving them enough time to have a fair trial?
The irony of someone using that flag as an icon worried about someone being held accountable is amusing
Omg people are so lame with their parasocial relationships with RUclips "celebrities" 🙄
@Grimm299 is the DA also worried about holding someone accountable? Guessing you missed the part where the DA also testifies in this video - asking to have her removed...womp...womp.....womp....
@@Copewatcher3422Yes! Thank you!
This is simply a defense strategy, has little to do with Judge Boyd.
That is my take on this as well. She might be quite ok with being recused from this mess
I disagree. I believe 25% of their toddler tantrums are bc they cannot stand it when a woman in authority puts them in their place. And for a gang that loves to show off and mouth off to one another, they sure become camera shy when it comes to putting them on RUclips for the general population to witness.
As they're dragging her name through the mud.
Hey, maybe don’t commit crimes in Bexar County…how about that? If criminals are afraid to stand in front of her, I don’t see how that makes her look bad. I think by broadcasting her courtroom she is offering her community complete transparency with regard to her rulings. Bottom line here is don’t find yourself in the position where you are even needing to wonder if Judge Boyd is going to smoke your goofy behind…how about that? It’s sooo simple!!!
What? This hearing has everything to do with judge boyd.
Judge Boyd is an amazing fair & unbiased judge! This is TOTAL BS!
Attorney Nisbet at 53:00 is very credible and comes across as genuine. I believe his account of Judge Boyd allowing YT to change her at times. As much as we enjoy watching.....this is people's lives.
Also, these attorneys are risking ALOT by testifying. She can make their lives miserable as they work with her on a regular basis and others in a small legal community. The case involved in highly charged, and has significant implications in the community. You can see how much this weighs on each person testifying.
I’m SHOOK right now!! WTH??? I ABSOLUTELY don’t understand how anyone could think Hon. Judge Boyd is biased. This is not right. Something STINKS!
EXACTLY!!!
I have internalized what you're saying here
She's a big hypocrite
With a handle like yours I'm thinking it isn't Judge Boyd who's guilty of hypocrisy 😂
I’ve been watching her for a while now and I’ve seen her biases, especially when it comes to individuals who refer to children as kids. The word “kids” in reference to children has been used in the US as a normal part of speech since the early 1800s. Yet, she has no issue using the word “gay” as a reference to homosexuals, as “gay” in that context has only been around since the 1960s! Gay use to mean happy!
I’d love to a linguist call her out!
I’ve also seen her show bias against atheists.
As evidenced by her mentioning the separation of church and state and never having any issues with requiring people swear to a god while swearing them in!
Unfortunately, I most likely disagree with most of you. I would not want anyone on a jury trial who have this much access to watching a judge’s performance on RUclips. The bias possible is supported by all the comments against this hearing. I would absolutely want these attorneys for my defense. Whether guilty or not, all deserve a fair trial. Most compelling testimony is from former prosecutor, Nesbit working in Judge Boyd, courtroom.
Disagree his testimony was speculative. He could be considered an expert witness.
These attorneys are protecting their professional licenses. There is very much at stake and this may become case law up before the Supreme Court.
If the prosecution and defense agree on too short length of time for discovery etc..then this is compelling that there have been reversible errors made.
Hubris is the fall of many otherwise great individuals.
So, Judge Boyd's mother watches her daughter on a big screen. And her daughter rang her one day. Shocking conspiracy between the two. Just shocking.
Who paid for the big TV put in her mom's house? I bet tax payers, paid that bill. I really like Judge Boyd too but I think all judges need to be looked at because no one is infallible and power is addictive. Judges have a job to do, but they are not god. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. They should be transparent.
@@debbieunold245 I would be careful what I bet on was bought "by taxpayers money" in a sitting Judge's mother's home. My father was a commissioner and a magistrate, my grandfather was a senior judge. Are you seriously suggesting that we list all items over the cost of a certain amount in our relatives homes, prove ownership with receipts, remove TV's, fridges, cars, groceries etc from an 80 year old lady's home if there is a whisper of a doubt about purchase origin, and sanction everyone involved? Is it okay if my grandfather is retired after 50 years of devoted work, but what about my grandma? Does she warrant a gift from my Dad of a tv? (Ironically I grew up in a country without TV's in the 60s and 70s.) It's not simple, and I actually agree with you. Check out mayor Tiffany Henyard though, from Dolton township, if you really want to follow a case that is corrupt and desperately in need of transparency. Take care, love.🙏🏼🕊🌏💐❤️🩹🫶🏽
I'd watch my son on a big screen TV!❤😅😊
@@debbieunold245😮
I’m speechless! Judge Boyd is one of the most fair, calm judge I’ve seen. So what if she starts her day with levity? It’s a stressful day for everyone, I would think this would help. To say she is bias is ridiculous.
Simply scanning the comments on this video will show that there are reasonable people who think Judge Boyd is biased. That's proof enough to recuse her and she shouldn't have an issue with that if she's truly unbiased. The mere appearance of bias is all that's needed to recuse her, nobody has to prove that bias actually exists. Unfortunately there are a lot of commenters who don't seem to understand that fact.
This is just crap. Judge Boyd is the most fair Judge. And she doesn't give two sh!ts about RUclips. Does she like the fact that a proud mother who worked her entire life to put her daughter through school can see the fruits of her hard work ?? Of course why not. This is men who don't like a woman in the role of anything above them. It's pathetic.
@@mjd111 you mean you don’t think her mother is making all her judicial decisions?!
@@peopleincourt 😁🤣 Love your channel !! Thank you ✌️
This screams of misogynists and white boy privilege. They got so outraged over being poked fun at that this is the best they can come up with. Also, to infer she's consulting her mother on judicial decisions is so offensive. They'd never accuse a man of any of this behavior. Highlighting the "staging of her handbag and flowers".... Ooof, this is infuriating!
@@peopleincourtHow wld that lawyer even Know that her mom contacted her? Unless I missed something that's purely his opinion
@@peopleincourtso if that is your question, then why do you post her court cases?? If you don't believe in her then I guess it is only for greedy gain. I'm out
Im sorry but, I think this is total 💩! This sounds like they KNOW that she is a NO NONSENSE Judge, as one should be, and they know this will possibly not get the outcome they want. Now, I am only at the middle of this video but I still feel something stinks!
Judge is a woman a strong fair woman and knows her job
If she is a "no nonsense" judge, why is she engaging in so much nonsense?
@@falseprophet1024what nonsense
@@falseprophet1024 What nonsense? Allowing court to be public and accessible? Being fair and actually following the law? Telling the truth to people who come before her and need a dose of reality and some guidance they never got from their parents? Holding people accountable for their actions?
@@8nin827
Trying to start a trial before discovery is even finished would probably be the best example..
I hope those "officers" get an Even HARSHER Judge and that they get Fired, sentenced to life in prison, and Sued by the family... the county and the state as well!!!!!
Yep I was just thinking that myself that really would be KARMA wouldn't it hope it happens and they lose everything they own
By an even harsher judge do you mean one who will allow the prosecution the time they need to prepare their case, or something else?
So the public has the benefit of officers wearing bodycams for many reasons, like holding cops accountable. Judges, lawyers, and criminals should also be held to the same standards. Public court allows the community to gain knowledge of the judicial system and safeguards the public in many ways. I've learned so much by being in Judge Boyd, Simpson, Manning, Stevens, Fleischer, etc. court. What a public injustice if it isn’t allowed. We are the people, we are the state, and we should have access to public information.
I love Judge Boyd but I have often wondered if the posturing with setting a scene so to speak , would not backfire some day. The whole flower /purse thing is lovely, but I find the purse thing wholly strange and pretentious. Who would put a pocketbook in a prominent place in a courtroom where it has no use, no contribution, no relevance to what is being said/done. And, arguably could present a constructive nuisance and/ or distraction. My discipline has been criminal law for almost 15 years and I have never taken my own purse into a court room, and in fact, endeavor to take as few things with me as possible, especially expensive things, wallets, money, electronic devices, etc. if I needed ‘personal’ things with me that would customarily be kept in a purse, I kept them on my person, in a pocket, etc. if I wanted flowers or decoration, I kept them in my office where I was free to enjoy the item in question. This is not a dinner table or even her office. The flowers and a pocketbook, albeit beautiful, do seem incongruous with the purpose, nature and sanctimony of a courtroom. And careful placement of both, in the angle of the camera, are self serving and pretentious and add nothing to the expected decorum and focus of the court.
When you know you have NO DEFENSE for your clients.....you open your "CREATIVE LAWYERING MANUAL" and this is what you drag out.
Texas, nuff said.
Yup!🙌🏼
Exactly
@@bonniecreighton4163 I was speculating the same thing. I just don’t get why they’re putting it all on the line for these guys. There has to be more to the story. There always is.
Recuse judge.
Change the venue.
File hundreds of motions.
Claim discovery is not satisfied. Then bury relevant and exculpatory information in an avalanche of boxes.
Hide exculpatory evidence.
Pretend cameras mysteriously "weren't working."
Threaten to have prosecution lawyers disbarred.
Complain about accoutrement on judges counter.
Find voting party affiliation.
Violate gag order thru third party.
Quash evidence showing cop has numerous previous violent outbursts, beatings, or murders.
Quash domestic violence history.
Pack courtroom with officers in uniform for intimidation purposes.
"Accidentally" reveal juror names to public encouraging harassment, stalking, and threats.
The list is endless.
Jesus. They didn’t like how she ruled period! She is always fair! And tries to help people!!
Are you kidding me....she's about the worst Judge on the planet and should be made to step down as judge...she has become an entertainer instead of a judge...she is 100% biased and unfit to serve as a judge...I pray she faces repercussion from the bar and code of conduct...and yes..I 100% believe that judge Boyd's phone conversation with her mom influenced her to change her mind...my question is how could you be so naive to question whether this goes on in her courtroom...you need to wake up and smell the corruption in our judicial system...
@@cinnycin7259I can tell you're one of those that likes to exaggerate.
@@cinnycin7259totally agree! How can you sit there and say she the fairest judge there is? That's absurd. She's thr first one to degrade someone and she even puts family members of the defendants down, at every chance she gets. She's the worst. I can't stand her.
Yes, she does... She gives the impression that she's above everyone@@danachilcote4685
@@cinnycin7259 Your problem is that you are expecting judicial conduct, but talking to a judge wapner, judy, caprio and joe brown crowd. Comparatively speaking, she's lady justice herself.
I really normally agree with Judge Boyd, and was livid when I first started watching. I thought it was a “good ol’ boy” tactic. After listening to the full testimony, I agree with the judge and his ruling.
@@lilmzjinx yep. I’m right there with you.
I agree as well. She's still my favorite YT Judge and she's from my hometown.
This judge had no choice. I agree as well. It's one ounce of doubt and immediate recusal is mandatory. "Reasonably questioned" is not a hard burden 😂
After watching this hearing this was the correct ruling. If pressed to proceed without full disclosure and discovery incomplete would be an injustice to the defendants. If convicted there would have had to have another trial.
I watch judge Boyd from the Netherlands and I have so much respect for her. She is a great judge
I stumbled upon the hearing where Judge Boyd was lecturing and chastising an attorney, and I knew nothing about the case beforehand. At the time, however, I wondered just who put the bee in her bonnet, so to speak.
I agree with the decision to recuse her from the case in question.
I think the fact the prosecutor agreed with the defense made the judges decision easy peasy‼️
@@Jamcrackerr well said. The bee in the bonnet was kind of the same feeling I had when I was watching this for the first time.
@peopleincourt Thanks for the response. And I *still* miss your lives!😃
I agree with you. Judge Boyd seems to be a fair and wise person to me but the appearance of bias against the defense team in not granting the continuance in such a complex case along with the FMLA issue warrants the recusal. It seemed clear that Boyd, Goss and the British lawyer all had some major problems with each other. The Brit leaving for a pre planned vacation was galling but not allowing extra time to analyze evidence was the kicker. Judge Boyd made a mistake. It has been rectified.
I think the judge here got it right. I love Judge Boyd, but there does seem to be a problem not honoring the attorney's FMLA leave and granting a continuance.
So this coming from someone who likes Judge Boyd I can remember this exact incedint witj this lawyer/team playing out and wondering why she seemed to be even to me as a layman, to be pushing tjrough this case and rudely so not allowing for a continuous oncr I heard the lawyers argument in court. I can remember saying outloud why is she pushing this through so fast. I thought it was fast as when argued their motion so many valid points were made including the fact that it had been leas than a month that the prosecutor on the case had even been assigned and also the fact that the case was only a few months old as I believe its a 2024 case. I further remember it standing out again that she seemed to have a problem with this lawyer. I thought that due to her not just denying his continuance motion for family leave with a wife due to delivery shortly, but specifically her comment and suggestion that basically if he didnt like that ruling that his CLIENT could always sever his case from the other two! Part of what made that so blatantly wrong was thinking that she's been a defense attorney herself and such a suggestion to change a clients entire trial strategy due to his family leave time like a ludicrous suggestion and I was like what's going on here?!? Thank you to the channel moderator for not putting the outcome of this hearing in the title of the video.
Informative comment.
I love Judge Boyd but I agree that if both parties needed more time, particularly with potential Brady evidence, continuation should have been granted.
This is nothing!! Watch judge Cannone with the Karen read case! Even the prosecution wasn’t ready and she went forth and prospered regardless 😂
@@Prettylittlecrimesjudge Bev in MA is horrible and biased. Her flawed verdict sheets led to the mess they're now in.
@@Katrina-qs2rl oh I know!! I’m in MA! A town over from canton unfortunately 🙈
JUSTICE FOR JUDGE BOYD
What a bunch of cry babies 🤦🏽♀️
Judge Boyd walking in to this hearing was SO shady.
Considering the prosecutor agrees, I would agree that it is a bad idea to go ahead. It would be unjust to rush something this big - for the victim’s family more than anyone else. Whoever did it should be found guilty the right way
This is zealous defense, which is a good thing. But. I do think it stems from this lawyer's personal feelings about Judge Boyd, combined with the larger defense team's desire not to have this trial livestreamed. And of course the elephant in the room is a bunch of Texan white guys vs. a Black woman in a position of power, which I'll willingly admit may not be anyone's primary or even conscious motivation, but it plays in the background, regardless.
@@louiseporterbridges2040 I know. Sometimes that whole zealous defense thing is super annoying and inconvenient, lol
No no no. They are bringing up valid points. She should be refused and I like her and watch her show all the time
How do you make this about race? Both prosecution and defense say they are not ready for trial. Multiple queries regarding how often a motion for continuance being denied indicate this is an oddity in their experience. I would say that the "elephant in the room" mostly hangs out in your subconscious and it certainly gets fed there.
@@megmeyer7563 Thank you! 100% agree. I was starting to think I was the only one.
@@vegasilkit Also agree 100%!
Watched the whole thing and it seems like Boyd was in the wrong here. Happens to the best of us. Hopefully she'll recognize that and walk it off. This is why checks and balances exist! Judges are human.
Best comment!
I like Judge Boyd, however I think it’s always a good thing for all judges to have a review of their performance, at least once in their career as a judge. Judges have a position of considerable power. I believe, as you say she will recognize this and continue to be a fair and just judge.
So here’s the thing- then she berates and belittles the defendant
I don’t get why Judge Boyd didn’t just recuse herself. Why did she let it get to this point? Just the appearance of a bias is enough to have a judge recuse themselves, let alone an actual bias.
Because she did nothing wrong and they are trying to recuse her because she will not tolerate their bs stories and excuses. If they are guilty she will send them to jail. They know it. They want an easier judge not a fair judge. 💯
I did watch this incident on a channel a few weeks back. At the time I agreed that she was being hard on the attorneys. Knowing that you will have 3 defendants and all of the attorneys and their staff, what would be so wrong in moving courtrooms? Right to a speedy trial is a real thing, but you are purposefully forcing the prosecution and defense to go to trial when they said they were not ready. Shame on Boyd!
I like Judge Boyd - she has common sense - ALL court proceeding should be televised - too many shady things happen in darkness
Ruling to have her recused ensures in theory that no one can complain about bias. I think this judge is trying to protect Judge Boyd too. We’ll see how this turns out for those who are complaining!
True!!
Boyd should have rrcused herself before this had to occur.
I'm very torn on this. I like Judge Boyd, but I saw one of the cases that they brought up, not the murder, and she seemed very biased. It was really surprising because I am used to her being fair and on the other hand murderous cops are the worst scourge of the justice system. Funny how they complain about Boyd having a big screen, but they are happy to use one for their case.
Yup, definitely doesn’t look good.
The big screen was installed in her mother’s house. Pay attention.
I think it’s a testament to Judge Boyd’s ethics that she is showing true court cases and what is done via the court system and her sound judgment and advice.
@@annied8161 I'm like oh no not the umbrella ☔story again ☔.
The best drive scene in Texas is Honorable John Stevens Jr., Jefferson county
Best judge this side of heaven 🕊️💕
@@Whattodoohmy would be funny to watch them in Stevens’ courtroom or David Fleischer’s.
Waa Waa Waa. Grown men crying because their fee-fee’s are hurt. Ridiculous
Please don't cry.
If I felt my attorney was "disliked" by the judge and it was effecting my case your damn right I would be crying.
These guys do sound like a bunch of whining boys crying because they were told no.
This
Little boys crying for attention.
Here we go again with a deminstration of "The Goid Old Boys Club" this defense team will say and do anything to maline the reputation and character of Judge Boyd, if it means their slime ball clients get away with killing someone in their own home. This defense team will most likely end up with a Judge out of their "club" who won't hold tbese slime balls accountable or be fair. I hope and pray there will be justice for this victim and her family
I agree..they don't get there way and they see respect and her reputation growing and jealousy is just ugly...shame on them..we should knw what's going on in court rooms
Umm...did you watch the video, including the clips of the judges behavior? Obviously not cause the only person who looks bad here, or like a slim ball is Judge Boyd.
LOL - just got to the part where Judge Boyd actually walks into this court proceeding, again talk about scumbag behavior - the real Judge had to tell her to leave. Thinking she should probably be disbarred.
Exactly. Good old boys club.
@@Copewatcher3422 SERIOULY!! Judge Boyd, is one of the finest Judges I have ever heard!! This defense team wanted her removed because they want to get their slime ball clients off for killing this lady on VIDEO IN HER OWN HOME!!
The judge hearing this motion is well versed in the law. It seems that Judge Boyd should have granted the continuance. That was based on the law. It is concerning that the denial by Judge Boyd appears to have been contrary to the law. The appearance of bias is evident by testimony of the witnesses on both sides of the case. Even the appearance of wrongdoing is something to avoid.
💯🎯⚖️
This is unbelievable. I’m shocked. Shes a fantastic judge and fully transparent. I’m… I’m at a loss. They ought to be ashamed.
I’m usually a fan, but her rulings in this case were inexcusable and they were 100% right to recuse her.
The idea that both the prosecution and defense could jointly request a continuance for extremely valid reasons and have it denied without explanation is insane. Especially when the prosecution is saying they won’t be able to turn over important discovery in time for the trial. If they were convicted it would be immediately reversed on appeal.
It also sounds like she wanted to proceed because it was taking soo (too) long. What happened to speedy trials? Why should the victims not also get justice in a timely manner?
IMO Judge Boyd was wrong for telling them they will have multiple people on trial with multiple lawyers each and they have to all sit at the tiny table because she said so.
Yes, she should have checked with the court administrator before making that statement. The other option would be temporarily removing part of the public seating and providing more space for the defense teams.
She is one of the best I just can’t believe it
She is a d I refuse to believe it
she kinda sucks, tbh
Another example of putting criminals 1st!
Believe it👍 She is being removed by the superior judge because both sides testified that she is NOT GIVING THEM ENOUGH TIME TO HAVE A FAIR TRIAL.
In addition, she's not letting the lead attorney speak and she refused his FMLA request.
She obviously has a personal issue that isn't allowing her to see this case clearly.
Dont believe it. It's still true👍
She's clearly not. Unless you consider power crazed, corrupt judges as "the best"?
This law firm constantly plays games. The Attny of record doesn't show up and they send a substitute. Yet they can never seem to get coverage during their "Non-refundable" vacations and family leaves. They're so arrogant.
This is THAT same law firm?! Omg, they’re a bunch of clowns.
I stopped watching Judge Boyd after a few views. I don’t like her purposely displayed handbags. In my opinion that in itself is a play to the cameras and to make herself memorable amongst the other judge channels. Inappropriate for the seriousness of the courts. That being said, if these attorneys are stating facts, and I don’t know if they are or not, she earned the recusal. Her alleged behavior is questionable at best and egregious at worst thus giving a clear appearance of impropriety.
Amen
I became disenchanted very quickly. All her fans should remember that her “issues” may contribute to the end of live streaming.
I agree, I am in favor of openness and transparency, but a court should be an exercise of the law, and not a performance. Cameras seem to inevitably draw out performative elements from people, which is different to having public or reporters in court watching the proceeding.
There does seem to be a correlation between how much judges welcome media in the court vs how "performative" the judge is.
@@Nikalette100 Maybe in texas but this is a state-by-state thing. I don't think she's done anything wrong - she gets to run her court room as she wants, and they gotta play the game.
OMG i LOVE ❤️ Judge Boyd!!!!! She is the most unbiased and honest judge I have watched on a regular basis-every day i watch her court and i have never seen her move people like the attorneys are claiming only times i see her moving people around is for the DA or the defendants attorney to the appropriate places that they always stand and as for the court reporter-she can’t do her job unless she can hear the words to put on the record and the box that the people in custody are sitting is close to the reporter and they talk to their attorneys at this time and they get louder and it messes up the record! -no record or nothing on the record is a big problem because then you have no idea what happened in court with the case!
@@melonioilar8569
You have to follow the law that makes you unbiased but she's not a totally unbiased human ... Her robe is a cloak. She has slipped a few times and her real thoughts are spoken, a oops moment maybe
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I like judge Boyd…..but if she is doing something wrong then she is not above the law.
That is the correct view! It's not so much as she's trying to be above the law but that the Judge in this matter is trying to maintain the public trust that all proceedings are impartial.
No one is above the law.
And every person can be replaced in any position they may have/hold!
I cant even watch this because they are hating on her so bad.
@@bekahhooper9852 it was hard to watch. I stopped half way through the first time but then I realized I needed to hear everything they have to say. I like her. I didn’t want to be ignorant as to what’s going on. Judges sometimes get recused and over turned. I’m not mad about that. Maybe she doesn’t like the guy and can’t be impartial, I’m not even mad about that. I’m mad at how they go after her streaming and how they paint all content creators with an unflattering brush. It’s unfair and not cool. But that’s what lawyers do. It’s their job. The facts of the case they have to try are bad for their clients. I’m sure there are local politics I can’t even begin to understand at stake. But ffs, the last thing we need is fewer court streaming. They should all be streaming. It’s 2024. The vast majority of people can’t go live to courtrooms around the county to see what’s going on. We can’t trust the mainstream media to cover things like this with accuracy. The public needs to be allowed to see Justice.
@@peopleincourt 🎯🎯🎯
This is absolute BULLSH.. Noway did Judge Boyd change her mind about ruling on a probation revocation case because of influence from Zoom watchers. She might be relieved to have another Judge preside over this case and not deal with this nastiness.
@@peopleincourt I'm watching it right now actually I couldn't leave it lol
@@bekahhooper9852 Same here. I just CANNOT believe the audacity of these lawyers. I'm praying THEY will reap what the sow, in Jesus' Name! 😞
- Doesn't look good for Boyd that she knows her mom watches her (she mentions her mom A LOT in her rulings). I would worry she was oerforming for her mother.
- Why did Judge Boyd enter the courtroom during these proceedings?! Was that as strange as I thought it was?!
I have never seen her be anything but fair and professional
Me too💯💯
I vote for Judge Boyd..She is a GOOD judge..
Is nobody listening. She refused to let a man take his FMLA, that is a federal offense. She would not let an attorney speak objections and defend his client, a violation of his clients rights. If I was accused of a crime and acquitted and then all of the RUclips videos on the judges web site still make me look guilty I would be pissed. Why would she come into the court room during these proceedings then give the Judge a wait one minute gesture? She knows she can't be in the court room. No one finds that to be fishy and rude? I enjoy watching Judge Boyd as well however people have the right to file for a recusal.
Absolutely.
I agree
I'm listening,and she just walked into the hearing and I'm literally shocked! That wasn't a good move on her part! The judge told her to leave.
She didn't refuse to let him do anything, other than delay a huge case. She didn't say he couldn't have his convenient fmla at all. So how do you figure she refused to let him take it?
@@JordanEmede_376She made the defendant choose between his attorney or a joint defense without explanation.
“Delay” isn’t accurate here, since the trial is way ahead of schedule. There hasn’t been a single continuance yet, and the prosecutors haven’t even had time to review the evidence and provide it to the defense in time. It’s insane. A first continuance is granted automatically in major cases even without a reason, and usually more after that.
No one is aware of any judge anywhere denying a continuance for FMLA, and it would be unthinkable to any judge in America to deny a continuance when both the prosecution and defense come together to say they need more time just to comply with their basic ethical obligations and the defendants’ constitutional rights.
Let me start by saying that what those officers did was absolutely tragic and horrible and should be absolutely punished. But, I'm also a very fair and reasonable person and that is no excuse to treat their lawyers the way she is. Those defendants have rights and she is violating them in very indirect ways via the attorneys. And, to walk in the courtroom without warning during testimony on her recusal hearing is showing blatant disrespect and outright egregious behavior to not only those attorneys but as well as the judge who will undoubtedly view that negatively. The nerve of her to feel she could do that is evidence that those lawyers may actually have a point. Also, to have a former AND current prosecutor testify is very validating to the bias accusations. Hearing that she is leaving cases online of people's whose records have been expunged is a GIANT NO NO! That is absolutely a violation of laws and rights.
I don’t think that’s a violation. Should ever travel of OJ Simpson Trial be removed? Rittenhouse? If I was tried and found innocent I would want full record of the state NOT proving their case. Should NBC, ABC, CNN etc scrub their news footage and delete all records of anyone they reported on being accused? That’s silly.
I like watching Boyd, but the blind loyalty for Boyd in here is ridiculous.
People will see what they want. I think it depends on the kind of court watcher you are. I agree with the judges decision. I think the whole RUclips part is unnecessary and added nothing. She made a bad call. I think she maybe does dislike these lawyers. Even the judge said the RUclips thing was irrelevant and he was going on the facts of this case.
it is not blind loyalty but an earned respect for the judge. we see her being fair. we see her not letting people get out of control or being disrespectful to the court. we see her routinely offer available services to benefit prisoners and break their losing cycles.
@@rosemaryus-ct6151that part right there.
But like i said, she's only human, even she has made mistakes,i know judges aren't supposed to, and im not saying her mistakes have anything to do with her rulings, and they shouldn't,but it does happen, ( like when she makes statements about her mom or something of that nature, a judge has to be careful about those kinds of things).
@@susanengel-ix8bl this is true. my memory tells me the judge often shares down to earth advice, many times off the record. people who werent lucky enough to grow up in a caring, moral household benefit from that. i retired from DCF. having a moral counterpoint to reference is a gift.
How is Judge Boyd responsible for what a content creator says or titles their videos? This is ridicules. I bet if the title said, Defense attorney slams Judge Boyd and his client walks, he wouldn't bring it up. Lawyers are always trying to find a loophole. To accuse her of not accepting a plea deal because her mother said she shouldn't is absurd. That's defamation.
Actually I've heard her talking about her mom alot during a hearing.just saying.
The issue is not necessarily streaming, its more about not allowing a continuance when both sides knew there was evidence out there that hasn’t been processed. I think 🤦♂️
Just finished - after hearing the prosecutor testify, I do agree with the Judge’s decision here. It appears that was the factor that changed his mind. Not that Judge Boyd had any personal animus, but that she was rushing it to trial. Great video!!!!!
I’m only a few seconds in but what the h3ll is happening here?! 😮
@@moda78z I know. Just wait. It gets so much worse.
They’re upset because their precious egos got hurt by a strong female judge who likes to display her bag and floral arrangements. That’s basically what it comes down to lol
@@siiiiiuu7I agree 💯 percent
@@siiiiiuu7I seriously doubt that. But that’s a typical response from the “boss babe” crowd these days
@@siiiiiuu7 I guess I need to go look for the purse and flowers that I have missed seeing. I pretty much concentrate on the people. Decorations don't sway me one way or the other.
If I am arguing the right to view, it is free speech. It is LESS damaging to someone's guilt than a bodycam. 🎉 So, let's hear it for transparency! 🎉 I also disagree that the Supreme Court is NOT live video streamed. We should be free to watch that too. ❤
I have no problem with live streaming in the courtroom. I have watched Judge boyd for a while now. I felt even before this issue that she sees herself as Judge Judy. The purse in her background.the flowers every day. Looks like a TV show. Tell me of another judge to make a point to show an extensive collections of handbags. So why not allow judges to display classic cars in the courtroom or golf clubs or designer suits in the courtroom
How about curtains and throw pillows.
Judge Boyd is out to promote judge boyd.
Who cares? It’s a purse.
Next time you watch one of her probations conditions cases count how many conditions she puts on them and how much time they take. I counted 11 on one case and knew there was no way they would not violate. They did and ended up serving the time anyway but all her programs got those state funds. I am in Texas and if I ever have to go before her I will not waste my time or the states money and just do the time. I laugh everything she askes is there anything the court can do to to help you be successful. I'm like yeah map out those conditions on a calendar and you will see there are not enough hours in a week to keep a 40 hr. job and meet the 5-10 other conditions.
I've never seen content that she showed bias!
Neither have I !!!
I'd like to hear the back story that led up to "THIS" .
THIS feels like a F-ing Witch Hunt
I am thinking witch hunt. A woman, moreover, a black female judge…. I have watched her in many hearings and have always seen an unapologetic adherence to the law on her part.
@@lauramcadam5751 you literally just watched it.
Did you not just watch BOTH SIDES testify that Boyd is NOT GIVING THEM ENOUGH TIME TO HAVE A FAIR TRIAL? This is likely a first-ever in Texas litigation.
Y'all are delusional or just uneducated if you don't see what she's doing wrong
The problem is they're making it cloudy by emphasizing the performative aspect of it when they should be focusing on the continuance denial.
Unfortunately we don't see all their cases.
Ok I don’t think people know what’s goin on with the judge. She rushed to set the trial date. BOTH the defense AND prosecution asked for more time because they needed to gather more evidence. She said no. The reason? One of the lawyers on the defense team filed a motion about a year back that said her live streaming RUclips showing his clients face, who was not found guilty AND had no record, is against the law. So what did the judge do?? Make his life hell. So yes she should be recused.
She always pushes for speedy trials, and rarely grants last minute continuances. She's not biased against one side or the other.
@@maryturula7620 when both defense and prosecution ask for more time its ALWAYS given. That’s why she’s recused. Because an appellate judge looked at all the facts and concluded she wasn’t fair and needed to be recused. Point blank.
@@maryturula7620 she’s also biased due to the fact the lawyer on the defense has a past history with her. That’s why she’s recused. There is evidence that she’s biased which is why she was removed from the case
@@maryturula7620There is also no reason at all that she disrespected this as a joint defense.
Courts are public, and all should be on camera at all times as a matter of the constitution. Nevada has it right: the default is that the media is involved whenever they want to be, and it must be extraordinary to deny them.
RUclips is just another way we can hold our public officials accountable and to be frank I think they are over blowing a lot of her conduct as well as misconstruing things in the light most negative, but she definitely is someone I find unreasonable on a regular basis. I know that is blasphemy to law tube, but her and Judge Bryant have always left bad taste in my mouth. Their behavior has always bothered me. Bryant way more than Boyd, though.
Courts need to be on RUclips, but judges need to treat it like what it is: just another face in the crowd. That said, those people dont get to use our right to an open court and the commentary of the public as a way to escape scrutiny.
She was acting... whatever the legal word is for petty.
@@Mewse1203 well said. ❤️
I totally agree with u and I'm neither American or live in the States i'm English and live in the UK
I've found her unreasonable at times too. I've also thought she gives way too harsh sentences, but that can be personal opinion.
I wonder if part of her and Judge Bryant's persona is that, because they are African American and women, they've had to work MUCH harder to get to the positions they are in. Possibly this has some bases in their courtroom demeanor. It just is what it is.
@ceIIardoor the pony problem with that is that there are other black female judges that don't act like that. In the Detroit area, there are a few.
The fact that Boyd pranced into that court room is very telling of the level of arrogance that she displayed is stepping over the line…big mistake…
Yeah that didn't do her any favors.
It shows her narcissism.
Interesting
Can't even lie... Her videos were kind of entertaining but hearing this and finding out that she's basically doing that purposefully....? There's a time and place, a judge in the courtroom shouldn't be operating with entertainment in mind.
This is her 4th recusal
But yet there recording this? But they have a problem with there case being recorded!! Mhm
No they don't have a problem with their case being reordered. That is not the point.
@@Mark.E"performative." It is indeed part of the problem.
where recording? where case?
I love Judge Boyd, but with that being said, after hearing everything….i agree with this Judge’s decision. This is a very complex case and cannot be rushed. Even the Prosecutor agreed.
Exactly!
@@luvmyshihtzus7327 I agree. I thought it sounded unreasonably harsh when she denied it before any of this happened. I knew she’d been recused before but I didn’t connect that with these particular lawyers.
This is ridiculous. This lawyer has an ego that occupies the entire room. I wonder how capable is this lawyer. This is a very capable female judge and is not a part of the good o’ boy club.
What about the prosecutor that agreed with the defense? Is he wrong too?
Watch Boyd‘s behavior is often grossly inappropriate and offensive. Infuriates me when she tells a woman that her eyelashes are too long. I have lots of opinions about her hair and I don’t say any of them. I’m glad to see some accountability. Any conviction to be had will be tainted if it comes from her court. Let’s not have that shall we.
I don't think it's the RUclips channel but I think it's obvious she doesn't like certain attorneys.
She's an effective, fantastic Judge. She actually makes sure that people who commit crimes pay the time! She keeps her community safe! Petty defense lawyers!
If she makes sure people pay for their crimes and because of her conduct they are released back into the streets to commit more crimes. What good is that doing?
Right! How dare those pesky defense lawyers give their client a zealous defense! lol
I've always found her to be more than fair when dealing with people. Are they throwing everything to see what sticks ???
I'm confused. Her live streams don't allow live chat, not that I've ever seen anyway. It just streams the court proceedings live as far as I'm aware. To me there's no difference to someone forming an opinion about someone in court if they were attending live than if they were watching it on a stream. Judge Boyd is always fair and bases her decisions on the evidence presented, any previous criminal activity and their compliance with her rulings, probation etc. How on earth does streaming the courtroom affect that?
@@peaceisnature except apparently when her mother calls and tells her to change her rulings 🙄
One of the other comments, for what it's worth (as we don't know the factual basis) is that the chat feature had been turned off some time ago -which would indicate that it was at one time active.
Last year an attorney filed a motion to stop her streaming. The chat function was disabled soon afterward.
@@ry413 same attorney here
@@peopleincourt There must have been more than one motions then. I know attorneys Featherston and Scharff both filed too.
She just walked into this hearing and I'm absolutely shocked!! Why would she do that? That blew my mind,,!!
Why wouldn't she? They are talking about her. Doesn't she have a right of reply in the US?
She works in there.
When I saw the hearing, I was surprised that she wouldn't grant a continuance, especially because it was a first request and the issues (expert unavailable and discovery not complete) are reasonable grounds.
The expert they wanted couldn’t be available for several months and they didn’t want to get a different one so this is how they get their way! They cry about the Judge being bias-presto here we are months later when we get to prolong the time and get our expert! Pretty underhanded but sad to drag the innocent Judge down this path because you didn’t get the right ruling!
@@melonioilar8569The prosecution lodged the similar complaint.
This Judge clearly was being difficult and passive aggressive. She was removed because she deserved removing.
I think the prosecutor who was subpoenaed was extremely eloquent as to the reasons for a continuance. I love Judge Boyd, and Goss skewerd the truth, about the trial he whinged about, I watched it but I think it much better that a different Judge and a continuance will favour the Prosecution and all this fuss by the defence has damaged thier case which is all to the better. Anew trial will not be option even though an appeal can be admitted. The video of those 'peace' cops is damning and horrendous. I'm sure they will all go down. To break into the victim's house and murder her with 16 shots fired is unconscionable and unforgivable.
Ok, i just started this, and I'm already mad. Okay, take her off youtube she's still going to be the same fair, unbiased, caring judge. She's still going to be Honorable Judge Boyd
I didnt realize this channel is Judge Boyd's. The content should belong to the county/govt not the judge. If a judge is making money from court content, then their is a greater possibility of partiality and in the extreme...corruption.
WOW! I’m so glad she got kicked off this trial because she’s extremely rude and arrogant. She literally behaves like a queen, not a judge. I’ve never understood why anyone likes her so much because they certainly wouldn’t if they or their own family were subject to her attitude of disdain.
Their referencing one case out of thousands! Do they know what exactly she spoke to her mom about...NO they do not. They're reaching and I mean reaching!! This is just shameful these officers and attorneys believe they will have a better outcome from a Judge that isn't as strict as Honorable Judge Boyd!