Precision Testing: How to Check the Accuracy of 45-Degree Combination Squares

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 сен 2024

Комментарии • 17

  • @ChadBarton-d1p
    @ChadBarton-d1p 6 месяцев назад

    Wish I had you as a math teacher as a kid! What you said actually made sense. Thank you!

  • @Mike--K
    @Mike--K 7 месяцев назад +1

    I used your method and a marking knife. I am happy that my 300mm Starrett combination square is spot on.

    • @TheWoodgrafter
      @TheWoodgrafter  7 месяцев назад

      Cheers Mike,
      Yes a marking knife is a good idea, I am going to recheck my Starrett and the triangle.

  • @steveblewer1202
    @steveblewer1202 7 месяцев назад +2

    I'll be interested to hear Ralph from BD's comments about the carpenters square being out. I have that square.

    • @TheWoodgrafter
      @TheWoodgrafter  7 месяцев назад +4

      Yes, I am going to run that test again with more accuracy and work out what the actual deviation is.
      Then I’ll give him a ping and check the tolerance.

  • @kylereed3577
    @kylereed3577 7 месяцев назад

    Great video Andy, I’d like to see how the Incra perfect squares do. Thanks

    • @TheWoodgrafter
      @TheWoodgrafter  7 месяцев назад +1

      Cheers Kyle, i don’t have the 45 only the 90’s. It may be a good addition though, I’ll see what’s left in the budget :-)
      Cheers
      Andy

  • @Johnny19O
    @Johnny19O 7 месяцев назад

    Nice job Andy!

  • @TheWoodgrafter
    @TheWoodgrafter  7 месяцев назад

    Hi All,
    Thought I would share this with you all, how to check that 45 degree.
    The results amazed me.
    Enjoy
    Andy

  • @peterestall
    @peterestall 7 месяцев назад +1

    Try using the Pental 0.9mm rather than the 0.5mm, it's far easier to see and far more resiliant, and doesn't need sharpening.

    • @TheWoodgrafter
      @TheWoodgrafter  7 месяцев назад +1

      Thank you, I started using the 0.5 when I purchased the Incra rules (the hole is 0.5) but now I have the Benchdogs ones, I will indeed switch to the 0.9
      Cheers
      Andy

  • @hu5116
    @hu5116 7 месяцев назад

    Would like to see a comparison with the iGauge tools. Good video.

    • @TheWoodgrafter
      @TheWoodgrafter  7 месяцев назад

      Thank you for the comment, I don’t have access to the iGauge tools. Sorry :-(

  • @extremewoodworker
    @extremewoodworker 7 месяцев назад

    I don't consider the Pica marker with its very soft lead a precision marking device and wonder if that somehow impacted the results. Steve

    • @TheWoodgrafter
      @TheWoodgrafter  7 месяцев назад

      Yes the marker was a compromise so the video would pick it up, I think I said that on the video.
      I am going to re-run that test but use my marking knife instead of a pencil. Then I can use more complex maths to calculate the variance.
      I was very surprised by the Sterat and the BD triangle.