CRUSH Your Senior PM Behavioral Interviews Like This! (Mock Interview w/ a Senior Product Manager)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 19

  • @qinxinpan7658
    @qinxinpan7658 4 месяца назад +12

    Welcome back, Dianna! Thank you so much for creating all these videos. I recently accepted a senior PM offer from Meta and want to say a big thank you! There are a lot of prep materials in the community, but I watched and only watched your videos during prep. I think people under appreciate how many tips you are giving out in these videos.
    For me personally, this approach worked really well: 1) watch a couple videos to come up with my own framework, 2) mock the sample questions you posted about myself, 3) watched your case cracking for these questions, focusing on the flow/logic, 4) redo the mock and watch your post again to appreciate the details that signal senior PM thinking.
    Thank you again for creating these valuable contents and wishing you all the best!

    • @amylovescoffee4759
      @amylovescoffee4759 3 месяца назад

      Congrats fellow PM and thanks for sharing your tips. I’m gonna try this. Hope I’ll be next for the Meta senior PM offer 😂

  • @shilpashree4612
    @shilpashree4612 4 месяца назад +20

    Thanks for posting this. In actual interviews at maang, the interviewers do not listen to you as patiently as you guys do. They interrupt and ask many questions like what would you have done differently or what if the stakeholders do not agree to your solution, what would you have done. (Even though you say you had metrics to convince them). The interviews you guys are doing is great, but you need to include hard hypothetical questions for the same scenario /project that the interviewee mentions, as that is how I was interviewed by these companies.

    • @diannayau
      @diannayau  4 месяца назад +4

      great point, i've seen some interviewers be more aggressive with follow up questions and interruptions making the interviews become a combination of behavioral and situational, forcing candidates to do more on the spot thinking vs. coming memorized with stories. Great idea for an upcoming video...thank you for sharing!

  • @michaelprestoy6838
    @michaelprestoy6838 Месяц назад

    I tackle this question again and again in interviews, and I don't see a lot of prep materials for the "product you lead" or 0-1 product. Thanks a lot Dianna. This is extremely helpful.

  • @michaelprestoy6838
    @michaelprestoy6838 Месяц назад

    Side note - love the energy in the interview.

  • @divyasree8954
    @divyasree8954 Месяц назад

    Thanks for posting! Glad to see you back :)

  • @gamergarry4079
    @gamergarry4079 4 месяца назад +2

    back after so long , thanks

  • @amylovescoffee4759
    @amylovescoffee4759 3 месяца назад

    Thanks Diana for this video, it’s really great content and the guest is fantastic as well. ❤

  • @hsulisa4414
    @hsulisa4414 4 месяца назад

    You're back! Thanks for sharing❤

  • @patrickv6194
    @patrickv6194 3 месяца назад +6

    Sorry, that's not what zero-to-one product means? It's either a new feature of enhancement to existing user flow.

    • @michaelprestoy6838
      @michaelprestoy6838 Месяц назад

      I also have the same thoughts. The words 0-1 get thrown around a lot - by recruiters and hiring managers as well as candidates. True 0-1 is very hard, takes a lot of time, and not many people do it. However, hiring managers and recruiters ask for 0-1, and so we as candidates deliver the best fit to that question we can.

  • @lintongsvoice333
    @lintongsvoice333 4 месяца назад

    omg new videos!!! thanks for posting these really helpful videos!!

    • @diannayau
      @diannayau  4 месяца назад

      You're so welcome! More to come!

  • @anvikaanvika9834
    @anvikaanvika9834 4 месяца назад

    Thanks for posting. You are the best.

    • @diannayau
      @diannayau  4 месяца назад +1

      Thanks for watching!

    • @anvikaanvika9834
      @anvikaanvika9834 4 месяца назад +1

      @@diannayau Eagerly waiting for more.