evidence = P(H)*P(W)*P(FS), we don't need to calculate evidence for prediction as postirior(Male) and postirior(Female) both have same value in denominator.
evidence = P(H)*P(W)*P(FS), we don't need to calculate evidence for prediction as postirior(Male) and postirior(Female) both have same value in denominator.
This is the probability density. Check the Gaussian Naive Bayes here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naive_Bayes_classifier. Another nice explanation is available here: ruclips.net/video/TcAQKPgymLE/видео.html
evidence = P(H)*P(W)*P(FS), we don't need to calculate evidence for prediction as postirior(Male) and postirior(Female) both have same value in denominator.
the values being used here are continuous--meaning they are discrete numerical values--as opposed to categorical or class. that why we are using gaussian, rather than naïve . please see the youtube video on naive bayes, done by the same author, posted here on youtube---it is dealing with non continuous variables--ie CATEGORICAL VARIABLES to predict viability of play or no-play, based on the day's weather
evidence = P(H)*P(W)*P(FS), we don't need to calculate evidence for prediction as postirior(Male) and postirior(Female) both have same value in denominator.
why didnt we take varience squared in gaussian formula
Such a clear voice!
Thank you
Do like share and subscribe
Why we have put n-1 in denominator for variance calculation
Sir what is the value of evidence
Did you get the answer of evidence?
@@vaibhavv475 no
@@vaibhavv475 no bro evidence is lost
evidence = P(H)*P(W)*P(FS), we don't need to calculate evidence for prediction as postirior(Male) and postirior(Female) both have same value in denominator.
what is the value of evidence
evidence = P(H)*P(W)*P(FS), we don't need to calculate evidence for prediction as postirior(Male) and postirior(Female) both have same value in denominator.
P(H/M)>1 ?? Is it correct ?
I think P(h|M) should be less than 1
That's amazing, but the computation give me the same value, maybe in this case it's ryt.
variance ke formula me n-1 nhi n hgA
@@minshugupta8924for small datasets, n-1 is used.
This is the probability density. Check the Gaussian Naive Bayes here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naive_Bayes_classifier. Another nice explanation is available here: ruclips.net/video/TcAQKPgymLE/видео.html
Nicely explained. Thank you.
well explained.You are really great sir.💯
Thank You
Do like share and subscribe
what a beautiful explanation!
Thank You
Do like share and subscribe
Thanks
Well Explained💙
Thank You
Do like share and subscribe
Great sir 🙏
Thank You
Do like share and subscribe
best explained
Thank You
Do Like Share and Subscribe
What is the value of evidence?
5:28 bro he mentioned to leave evidence value. i too got the same doubt and went back😅
evidence = P(H)*P(W)*P(FS), we don't need to calculate evidence for prediction as postirior(Male) and postirior(Female) both have same value in denominator.
@@SupratimBhattacharjee-q7j my exam was in 2023.
@@talhajalil8674 The funny thing is that I am not studying for exam, I am studying Machine learning and coding on my own
Thanks Sir
Welcome
Please do like share and subscribe
Sir is this normalise guassian distrubution problem
@@MaheshHuddar sir i wanted to mail you some pictures can u help me in solving them
and i have to thank you sir for this guassian it same model came in our another slot exam
@@MaheshHuddar VIT AP SIR
@@MaheshHuddar vit sir your mail did please
@@MaheshHuddar i have sent an mail sir can u please check
good work bro
Thank You
Do like share and subscribe
Thank you so much sir. ❤
Welcome
Do like share and subscribe
Sir, what if all the attribute values are continuous values..for example we don't have gender in the above example
the values being used here are continuous--meaning they are discrete numerical values--as opposed to categorical or class. that why we are using gaussian, rather than naïve . please see the youtube video on naive bayes, done by the same author, posted here on youtube---it is dealing with non continuous variables--ie CATEGORICAL VARIABLES to predict viability of play or no-play, based on the day's weather
gender is not a predictor but but one of the classes you will be predicting using the continuous variables highlighted
Thank you for this sample explaind , i solved this example , but i have another values of variance of height goven female , and of P(h/m)
same here mere values bhi alag aa rahe hai
Is std = sqrt of variance ?
Yes
What is the value of evidence?
That can be ignored, answer will be same with or without the denominator
evidence = P(H)*P(W)*P(FS), we don't need to calculate evidence for prediction as postirior(Male) and postirior(Female) both have same value in denominator.