6. Gaussian Naive Bayes Classifier Algorithm to classify the person as Male or Female Solved Example

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 янв 2025

Комментарии • 65

  • @SONUPARMANIK-n1i
    @SONUPARMANIK-n1i 3 месяца назад +3

    why didnt we take varience squared in gaussian formula

  • @AlokTP
    @AlokTP 9 месяцев назад +1

    Such a clear voice!

    • @MaheshHuddar
      @MaheshHuddar  9 месяцев назад

      Thank you
      Do like share and subscribe

  • @JayantLalwani-el8um
    @JayantLalwani-el8um Месяц назад

    Why we have put n-1 in denominator for variance calculation

  • @waidapapa1514
    @waidapapa1514 3 года назад +5

    Sir what is the value of evidence

    • @vaibhavv475
      @vaibhavv475 Год назад +1

      Did you get the answer of evidence?

    • @waidapapa1514
      @waidapapa1514 Год назад

      @@vaibhavv475 no

    • @itsasecret2132
      @itsasecret2132 3 месяца назад +1

      @@vaibhavv475 no bro evidence is lost

    • @SupratimBhattacharjee-q7j
      @SupratimBhattacharjee-q7j 2 месяца назад

      evidence = P(H)*P(W)*P(FS), we don't need to calculate evidence for prediction as postirior(Male) and postirior(Female) both have same value in denominator.

  • @amnaahmed4729
    @amnaahmed4729 Год назад +3

    what is the value of evidence

    • @SupratimBhattacharjee-q7j
      @SupratimBhattacharjee-q7j 2 месяца назад +2

      evidence = P(H)*P(W)*P(FS), we don't need to calculate evidence for prediction as postirior(Male) and postirior(Female) both have same value in denominator.

  • @akashpb4179
    @akashpb4179 2 года назад +4

    P(H/M)>1 ?? Is it correct ?

    • @kartikpandya2193
      @kartikpandya2193 Год назад +2

      I think P(h|M) should be less than 1

    • @golimark6513
      @golimark6513 Год назад

      That's amazing, but the computation give me the same value, maybe in this case it's ryt.

    • @minshugupta8924
      @minshugupta8924 Год назад +1

      variance ke formula me n-1 nhi n hgA

    • @emadman8212
      @emadman8212 Год назад

      @@minshugupta8924for small datasets, n-1 is used.

    • @soumyajitchatterjee5603
      @soumyajitchatterjee5603 11 месяцев назад

      This is the probability density. Check the Gaussian Naive Bayes here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naive_Bayes_classifier. Another nice explanation is available here: ruclips.net/video/TcAQKPgymLE/видео.html

  • @luciddreams99
    @luciddreams99 2 года назад +1

    Nicely explained. Thank you.

  • @korimibhargavi7228
    @korimibhargavi7228 Год назад +1

    well explained.You are really great sir.💯

    • @MaheshHuddar
      @MaheshHuddar  Год назад

      Thank You
      Do like share and subscribe

  • @meshackamimo1945
    @meshackamimo1945 Год назад +1

    what a beautiful explanation!

    • @MaheshHuddar
      @MaheshHuddar  Год назад +1

      Thank You
      Do like share and subscribe

  • @i2204ZainUl
    @i2204ZainUl 27 дней назад

    Thanks

  • @neerajchauhan3790
    @neerajchauhan3790 2 года назад

    Well Explained💙

    • @MaheshHuddar
      @MaheshHuddar  2 года назад +1

      Thank You
      Do like share and subscribe

  • @nikhily8646
    @nikhily8646 2 года назад

    Great sir 🙏

    • @MaheshHuddar
      @MaheshHuddar  2 года назад

      Thank You
      Do like share and subscribe

  • @VikashSingh-vd9cp
    @VikashSingh-vd9cp Год назад

    best explained

    • @MaheshHuddar
      @MaheshHuddar  Год назад

      Thank You
      Do Like Share and Subscribe

  • @talhajalil8674
    @talhajalil8674 Год назад +1

    What is the value of evidence?

    • @MR_BINGO_
      @MR_BINGO_ Год назад +1

      5:28 bro he mentioned to leave evidence value. i too got the same doubt and went back😅

    • @SupratimBhattacharjee-q7j
      @SupratimBhattacharjee-q7j 2 месяца назад

      evidence = P(H)*P(W)*P(FS), we don't need to calculate evidence for prediction as postirior(Male) and postirior(Female) both have same value in denominator.

    • @talhajalil8674
      @talhajalil8674 2 месяца назад

      @@SupratimBhattacharjee-q7j my exam was in 2023.

    • @SupratimBhattacharjee-q7j
      @SupratimBhattacharjee-q7j Месяц назад

      @@talhajalil8674 The funny thing is that I am not studying for exam, I am studying Machine learning and coding on my own

  • @apurba1903
    @apurba1903 Год назад

    Thanks Sir

    • @MaheshHuddar
      @MaheshHuddar  Год назад

      Welcome
      Please do like share and subscribe

  • @kaarunya9118
    @kaarunya9118 3 года назад

    Sir is this normalise guassian distrubution problem

    • @kaarunya9118
      @kaarunya9118 3 года назад

      @@MaheshHuddar sir i wanted to mail you some pictures can u help me in solving them

    • @kaarunya9118
      @kaarunya9118 3 года назад

      and i have to thank you sir for this guassian it same model came in our another slot exam

    • @kaarunya9118
      @kaarunya9118 3 года назад +1

      @@MaheshHuddar VIT AP SIR

    • @kaarunya9118
      @kaarunya9118 3 года назад

      @@MaheshHuddar vit sir your mail did please

    • @kaarunya9118
      @kaarunya9118 3 года назад

      @@MaheshHuddar i have sent an mail sir can u please check

  • @rishabhkumar8115
    @rishabhkumar8115 2 года назад +1

    good work bro

    • @MaheshHuddar
      @MaheshHuddar  2 года назад

      Thank You
      Do like share and subscribe

  • @salmanshahid8128
    @salmanshahid8128 Год назад

    Thank you so much sir. ❤

  • @MahaLakshmi-pg5ux
    @MahaLakshmi-pg5ux 2 года назад +2

    Sir, what if all the attribute values are continuous values..for example we don't have gender in the above example

    • @meshackamimo1945
      @meshackamimo1945 Год назад

      the values being used here are continuous--meaning they are discrete numerical values--as opposed to categorical or class. that why we are using gaussian, rather than naïve . please see the youtube video on naive bayes, done by the same author, posted here on youtube---it is dealing with non continuous variables--ie CATEGORICAL VARIABLES to predict viability of play or no-play, based on the day's weather

    • @meshackamimo1945
      @meshackamimo1945 Год назад

      gender is not a predictor but but one of the classes you will be predicting using the continuous variables highlighted

  • @nadjetsaidani7924
    @nadjetsaidani7924 Год назад

    Thank you for this sample explaind , i solved this example , but i have another values of variance of height goven female , and of P(h/m)

    • @blaze102
      @blaze102 Месяц назад

      same here mere values bhi alag aa rahe hai

  • @CreativityCourse
    @CreativityCourse Год назад

    Is std = sqrt of variance ?

  • @vaibhavv475
    @vaibhavv475 Год назад +4

    What is the value of evidence?

    • @nothing2everything772
      @nothing2everything772 4 месяца назад

      That can be ignored, answer will be same with or without the denominator

    • @SupratimBhattacharjee-q7j
      @SupratimBhattacharjee-q7j 2 месяца назад +1

      evidence = P(H)*P(W)*P(FS), we don't need to calculate evidence for prediction as postirior(Male) and postirior(Female) both have same value in denominator.