what isn't acceptable is forcing devs to cope with shit hardware like this, the series X is only comparable in GPU power to a 2060, the lowest end GPU from Nvidia's 2018 lineup, the fact that it runs is a luxury, its 2024 man.
on xbox its normal bugfests like this Stalker 2 Xbox Series S: 972p/30fps Xbox Series X: - Quality Mode: 1440p/30fps - Performance Mode: Dynamic 1080p/60fps (common 900p)
@@PerOnnai if those details were unnoticeable they'd be culled, do you really think we don't make sure of that? If there were really so many unnoticeable details, you should be fine playing at minimum settings, should get rid of all that "unnoticeable" detail.
@@yesyes-om1po Fallout 4 is almost a Decade old and it doesn't run smooth on ANY Console, so stop your Fanboy BS and just accept the Fact that those Devs are lazzy and greedy
@@ahabduennschitz7670 you are literally comparing an entirely different studio, Stalker 2's devs are anything but "lazzy and greedy" you don't know shit about the game industry, they literally developed their game in the middle of a fucking war, one of their developers DIED, this isn't about fanboying. Also btw, I can run Fallout 4 at 4k 144hz ultra settings, if I had an RTX 2060, I'd be around the same performance levels as a Series X.
Actually its a very stable and nice experience at 30 fps on series s .The graphics are the same as series x, Same Ray tracing global Illumination. It just needs the motion Blur that does not work on Any platform. That would help a lot specially at 30 fps. The sad truth here IS that unreal engine 5 lumen feature IS too heavy for consoles to handle. They Will never reach 60fps with that tech. The only time I have seen 60fps with UE5 using nanite and lumen IS Robocop wich Is almost an on rail shooter.
I have to add that the image clarity on series s IS not very good. That happens on both consoles , but on the s is. Worst. And of top of low resolution we have many artifacts with rtx like ghosting. I am not a fan of UE 5 because those two reasons.. performance and quality of image.
@@ALLGAMES2025 1 look at the conditions of work they have, 2 the Series S is too weak. For this game i only want better resolution and a little more graphic but not 60 fps, i think that they are unattainable
Ofc such a broken Mess is part of Gamepass, but once its actually playable they will remove it. We pay 18€ per Month to be Alpha and Beta Tester for some shitbroken Games. Great Deal, innit!?
Dying Light 2 looks better than this with a dense tall city and 60fps. This lumen etc not worth it certainly not for lighting that stuff blends into the background anyway.
you mean the series S is garbage, even the series X is only comparable to something like a 2060, that should have been what the series S is, but the series S is even lower than that... imagine that, less GPU performance than a bottom of the line GPU from 2018.
@@yesyes-om1po Don't exaggerate, why are you talking nonsense about Series X being equivalent to 2060? Rtx 2060 is almost equivalent to the xbox series s console. Stalker 2 can definitely run 60fps on this console. The reason why the game runs at 30 fps is because the game is extremely poorly optimized.
@@kaganemre1949 the 2060 and the series x both have 12 tflops of performance in 32bit single precision instructions. this is the most reliable way to measure GPU performance, since it is the part of the GPU that handles all 3d compute, therefore, they have about the same 3d performance. I have a 3090, which has 35 tflops of performance, in most games, it is shown to have about 3x the performance of the consoles, which is almost a perfect 3x multiplication of the 12tflops. So its safe to say, the Series X is comparable to the 2060, and the Series S, even worse.
Did they finally fix the bloody stick drift so the game will be actually playable?
i never understood this i never had any issues with stick drift.
They fixed the stick drift but now the game is freezing back to back . I think the patch made it worse on Xbox
@@504landlord2 i agree it runs horrible on series s, i'm just gonna pass.
the performance issue still same previous.
The joystick deadzones have been increased in the latest patch which solved the problem for me.
Yeah it doesn't matter if it looks great if it's literally unplayable. 20-25 FPS is NOT ACCEPTABLE.
what isn't acceptable is forcing devs to cope with shit hardware like this, the series X is only comparable in GPU power to a 2060, the lowest end GPU from Nvidia's 2018 lineup, the fact that it runs is a luxury, its 2024 man.
on xbox its normal bugfests like this
Stalker 2
Xbox Series S: 972p/30fps
Xbox Series X:
- Quality Mode: 1440p/30fps
- Performance Mode: Dynamic 1080p/60fps (common 900p)
@@PerOnnai if those details were unnoticeable they'd be culled, do you really think we don't make sure of that?
If there were really so many unnoticeable details, you should be fine playing at minimum settings, should get rid of all that "unnoticeable" detail.
@@yesyes-om1po Fallout 4 is almost a Decade old and it doesn't run smooth on ANY Console, so stop your Fanboy BS and just accept the Fact that those Devs are lazzy and greedy
@@ahabduennschitz7670 you are literally comparing an entirely different studio, Stalker 2's devs are anything but "lazzy and greedy" you don't know shit about the game industry, they literally developed their game in the middle of a fucking war, one of their developers DIED, this isn't about fanboying.
Also btw, I can run Fallout 4 at 4k 144hz ultra settings, if I had an RTX 2060, I'd be around the same performance levels as a Series X.
How looks graphics
É incrivel um console de 300 chegar muito perto do que um pc de 1k faz. Ainda penso em voltar para meu series S e deixar o PC
Actually its a very stable and nice experience at 30 fps on series s .The graphics are the same as series x, Same Ray tracing global Illumination. It just needs the motion Blur that does not work on Any platform. That would help a lot specially at 30 fps.
The sad truth here IS that unreal engine 5 lumen feature IS too heavy for consoles to handle. They Will never reach 60fps with that tech. The only time I have seen 60fps with UE5 using nanite and lumen IS Robocop wich Is almost an on rail shooter.
I have to add that the image clarity on series s IS not very good. That happens on both consoles , but on the s is. Worst. And of top of low resolution we have many artifacts with rtx like ghosting. I am not a fan of UE 5 because those two reasons.. performance and quality of image.
Hey, I’m noticing an improvement with my series s after patch. Possible?
No
Yes on xsx 30 fps feel better plus they fixed the deadzone
Si
Stalker 2
Xbox Series S: 972p/30fps
Xbox Series X:
- Quality Mode: 1440p/30fps
- Performance Mode: Dynamic 1080p/60fps (common 900p)
@@XBOXisWeakAF really good
I think I'll stick with stalker gamma for now
I played Starfield in 30 i can totally play this aswell. The performance mode numbers fluctuate too much to use it hell even with vrr on
Noones going to mention the 666K gamerscore ?
It must be optimized At 60 fbs !!!!!
It's a Series S, is not powerful
@Gabrielegigli3 no ; the problem in developers only .
Lazzzy developers
@@ALLGAMES2025 1 look at the conditions of work they have, 2 the Series S is too weak.
For this game i only want better resolution and a little more graphic but not 60 fps, i think that they are unattainable
@@Gabrielegigli3 looks for xbox series x resolutions optimization it's also bad 👎 , all of this because the lazy f*king developers !.
Looks fine to me. 30fps is fine.
This is not stable 30
I literally can't see anomalies sometimes due to the blurry / garbish textures , game's optimzation's trash
Ofc such a broken Mess is part of Gamepass, but once its actually playable they will remove it.
We pay 18€ per Month to be Alpha and Beta Tester for some shitbroken Games.
Great Deal, innit!?
They are not removing this from gamepass. Microsoft literally helped move the company out of Ukraine
@Nizzle89 Thats your Argument? Ok wow
So the resolution is still crap I see
Had to stop playing
The game gave me a headache
Nice my pc with 3070 cost 1800$ and i have 30-40fps😢
He hajonga uyi bhentse sbali snene jo 🏆🫡
Why even make a new so called Xbox if it can’t run at 60 especially the series s
Bro it's the game itself very poorly optimised.. not a hardware issue
Dying Light 2 looks better than this with a dense tall city and 60fps. This lumen etc not worth it certainly not for lighting that stuff blends into the background anyway.
Cyberpunk 2077, Metro exodus, dead island 2 are better and run at 60fps
absolutely worth it, nanite and lumen makes this game better looking than any open world rn
@@kaniffeno its not lmfao DL2 ran on ps4 using rasterized lighting and it looked better than this soulless generic ue5 slop
@Butcher-m7y DL2 does NOT look better than stalker 2 lmao
man dl2 is trash and unreal 5 is a more powerful engine,stalker 2 looks great but the art could be better to squeeze the potential of the engine
As long as it's 30 fps it's garbage
Pues no lo juegues en series s 🤷
@@escannermx7275 wrong. It's been released to it so make it work 50-60 FPS.
you mean the series S is garbage, even the series X is only comparable to something like a 2060, that should have been what the series S is, but the series S is even lower than that... imagine that, less GPU performance than a bottom of the line GPU from 2018.
@@yesyes-om1po Don't exaggerate, why are you talking nonsense about Series X being equivalent to 2060? Rtx 2060 is almost equivalent to the xbox series s console. Stalker 2 can definitely run 60fps on this console. The reason why the game runs at 30 fps is because the game is extremely poorly optimized.
@@kaganemre1949 the 2060 and the series x both have 12 tflops of performance in 32bit single precision instructions.
this is the most reliable way to measure GPU performance, since it is the part of the GPU that handles all 3d compute, therefore, they have about the same 3d performance.
I have a 3090, which has 35 tflops of performance, in most games, it is shown to have about 3x the performance of the consoles, which is almost a perfect 3x multiplication of the 12tflops.
So its safe to say, the Series X is comparable to the 2060, and the Series S, even worse.