Chrisitan Guy was trying to grill zeeshan on manuscripts and authenticity of narrators and then @ 39:00 he states “it is irrelevant” if resurrection is missing in the earliest full manuscript of the bible Alhamdulilah (All praise be to God alone) for the light, truth and clarity of Islam
He's got a bone to pick with the Quran's use of "We" and "You" for different Aharuf, as if a pronoun party's going to shake up the entire doctrine! After all that, we have an entire passage (Story) that miraculously appears in the Bible now, claiming it's "irrelevant" because it doesn't rock the boat of Christianity's core doctrine! So, apparently, swapping "We" for "You" is the Islamic version of a cosmic mic drop! Ha! Classic.
Questions 1. WHERE IS INJIL IN QURAN TO PROVE CLAIM OF MUSLIMS ?? 2. WHERE IS TAWRAT IN QURAN TO PROVE CLAIM OF MUSLIMS ?? 3. WHERE IS ZABUR IN QURAN TO PROVE CLAIM OF MUSLIMS ?? 4. WHERE IS THE ORIGINAL QURAN ? 5. WHY DID UTHMAN BURN ALL ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPTS OF QURAN VARIANTS ?? 6. WHO TOLD UTHMAN TO CREATE HIS OWN OFFICIAL QURAN , WHICH YOU NOW FOLLOW BLINDLY, AS IF ITS FALLEN FROM HEAVEN ?? 7. DID ALLAH/ MOHAMMAD VERIFY UTHMANIC QURAN WHICH YOU USE NOW, AND CERTIFY IT ?? 8. WHEN WAS THE CERTIFICATION GIVEN BY ALLAH/MOHAMMAD TO PRESENT DAY QURAN ?? 9. IF THERE IS NO CERTIFICATION FROM ALLAH/MOHAMMAD TO UTHMANIC QURAN , HOW CAN THE SAME BE A DIVINE BOOK FROM ALLAH?? 10. IF QURAN IS TRUE THAN WHY IS UMMAH SPLIT INTO 73 SECTS, WHICH ARE FIGHTING AND KILLING EACH OTHER ?? 11. WHERE IS THE SOURCE OF MALE/FEMALE CIRCUMCISION IN QURAN ?? 12. DID MOHAMMAD AND ISHMAEL HAVE THEIR CIRCUMCISION AS PER LAW OF MUSA, TO BE IN LINEAGE WITH IBRAHIM, IF YES WHERE DOES IT SAY SO IN QURAN ?? 13. ARE YAJUJ MAJUJ STILL IMPRISONED ?? (SURA 18:86-97) IF SO WHERE ? 14. WHERE IS THE IRON WALL BUILT BY DHUL QURNAIN BEHIND WHICH YAJUJ MAJUJ ARE TO BE SAID TO BE STILL IMPRISONED AS PER QURAN??
brother has no issue in believing in bible that isnt preserved in its original language and earliest copy is 400 after jesus pbuh , yet he takes issues with fully chained narrations of hadith and quran that been scientifically carbon dated to the time of prophet , allah akbar the logic
Can one imagine the amount of arrogance and hypocrisy required to criticize Hadith and the Chain of narration while at the same time accept the Bible....
look up Hadith's that will embarrass a Muslim. Can you imagine following a religion that copied things from the bible and twisted them to follow Islam? The bible was here first, 500 years later Gabriel was sent by GOD to talk to Mohammad , why didn't GOD talk to him? And you say that GOD didn't speak thru Jesus??
Questions 1. WHERE IS INJIL IN QURAN TO PROVE CLAIM OF MUSLIMS ?? 2. WHERE IS TAWRAT IN QURAN TO PROVE CLAIM OF MUSLIMS ?? 3. WHERE IS ZABUR IN QURAN TO PROVE CLAIM OF MUSLIMS ?? 4. WHERE IS THE ORIGINAL QURAN ? 5. WHY DID UTHMAN BURN ALL ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPTS OF QURAN VARIANTS ?? 6. WHO TOLD UTHMAN TO CREATE HIS OWN OFFICIAL QURAN , WHICH YOU NOW FOLLOW BLINDLY, AS IF ITS FALLEN FROM HEAVEN ?? 7. DID ALLAH/ MOHAMMAD VERIFY UTHMANIC QURAN WHICH YOU USE NOW, AND CERTIFY IT ?? 8. WHEN WAS THE CERTIFICATION GIVEN BY ALLAH/MOHAMMAD TO PRESENT DAY QURAN ?? 9. IF THERE IS NO CERTIFICATION FROM ALLAH/MOHAMMAD TO UTHMANIC QURAN , HOW CAN THE SAME BE A DIVINE BOOK FROM ALLAH?? 10. IF QURAN IS TRUE THAN WHY IS UMMAH SPLIT INTO 73 SECTS, WHICH ARE FIGHTING AND KILLING EACH OTHER ?? 11. WHERE IS THE SOURCE OF MALE/FEMALE CIRCUMCISION IN QURAN ?? 12. DID MOHAMMAD AND ISHMAEL HAVE THEIR CIRCUMCISION AS PER LAW OF MUSA, TO BE IN LINEAGE WITH IBRAHIM, IF YES WHERE DOES IT SAY SO IN QURAN ?? 13. ARE YAJUJ MAJUJ STILL IMPRISONED ?? (SURA 18:86-97) IF SO WHERE ? 14. WHERE IS THE IRON WALL BUILT BY DHUL QURNAIN BEHIND WHICH YAJUJ MAJUJ ARE TO BE SAID TO BE STILL IMPRISONED AS PER QURAN??
Imagine the amount of arrogance and hypocrisy required to critized the New Testament when historians (scholars) recognize that the Gospel of Mark probably dates from c. AD 66-70, and the first epistle of Paul was probably written by the end of AD 52; Jesus being crucified (another thing no historian doubt about) in 33. I'll let you do the math. Muslims cannot say so of there own so called "Holy Book" ( which tend to be eaten by goats or burn by caliph) Have a great day.
Questions 1. WHERE IS INJIL IN QURAN TO PROVE CLAIM OF MUSLIMS ?? 2. WHERE IS TAWRAT IN QURAN TO PROVE CLAIM OF MUSLIMS ?? 3. WHERE IS ZABUR IN QURAN TO PROVE CLAIM OF MUSLIMS ?? 4. WHERE IS THE ORIGINAL QURAN ? 5. WHY DID UTHMAN BURN ALL ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPTS OF QURAN VARIANTS ?? 6. WHO TOLD UTHMAN TO CREATE HIS OWN OFFICIAL QURAN , WHICH YOU NOW FOLLOW BLINDLY, AS IF ITS FALLEN FROM HEAVEN ?? 7. DID ALLAH/ MOHAMMAD VERIFY UTHMANIC QURAN WHICH YOU USE NOW, AND CERTIFY IT ?? 8. WHEN WAS THE CERTIFICATION GIVEN BY ALLAH/MOHAMMAD TO PRESENT DAY QURAN ?? 9. IF THERE IS NO CERTIFICATION FROM ALLAH/MOHAMMAD TO UTHMANIC QURAN , HOW CAN THE SAME BE A DIVINE BOOK FROM ALLAH?? 10. IF QURAN IS TRUE THAN WHY IS UMMAH SPLIT INTO 73 SECTS, WHICH ARE FIGHTING AND KILLING EACH OTHER ?? 11. WHERE IS THE SOURCE OF MALE/FEMALE CIRCUMCISION IN QURAN ?? 12. DID MOHAMMAD AND ISHMAEL HAVE THEIR CIRCUMCISION AS PER LAW OF MUSA, TO BE IN LINEAGE WITH IBRAHIM, IF YES WHERE DOES IT SAY SO IN QURAN ?? 13. ARE YAJUJ MAJUJ STILL IMPRISONED ?? (SURA 18:86-97) IF SO WHERE ? 14. WHERE IS THE IRON WALL BUILT BY DHUL QURNAIN BEHIND WHICH YAJUJ MAJUJ ARE TO BE SAID TO BE STILL IMPRISONED AS PER QURAN??
Questions 1. WHERE IS INJIL IN QURAN TO PROVE CLAIM OF MUSLIMS ?? 2. WHERE IS TAWRAT IN QURAN TO PROVE CLAIM OF MUSLIMS ?? 3. WHERE IS ZABUR IN QURAN TO PROVE CLAIM OF MUSLIMS ?? 4. WHERE IS THE ORIGINAL QURAN ? 5. WHY DID UTHMAN BURN ALL ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPTS OF QURAN VARIANTS ?? 6. WHO TOLD UTHMAN TO CREATE HIS OWN OFFICIAL QURAN , WHICH YOU NOW FOLLOW BLINDLY, AS IF ITS FALLEN FROM HEAVEN ?? 7. DID ALLAH/ MOHAMMAD VERIFY UTHMANIC QURAN WHICH YOU USE NOW, AND CERTIFY IT ?? 8. WHEN WAS THE CERTIFICATION GIVEN BY ALLAH/MOHAMMAD TO PRESENT DAY QURAN ?? 9. IF THERE IS NO CERTIFICATION FROM ALLAH/MOHAMMAD TO UTHMANIC QURAN , HOW CAN THE SAME BE A DIVINE BOOK FROM ALLAH?? 10. IF QURAN IS TRUE THAN WHY IS UMMAH SPLIT INTO 73 SECTS, WHICH ARE FIGHTING AND KILLING EACH OTHER ?? 11. WHERE IS THE SOURCE OF MALE/FEMALE CIRCUMCISION IN QURAN ?? 12. DID MOHAMMAD AND ISHMAEL HAVE THEIR CIRCUMCISION AS PER LAW OF MUSA, TO BE IN LINEAGE WITH IBRAHIM, IF YES WHERE DOES IT SAY SO IN QURAN ?? 13. ARE YAJUJ MAJUJ STILL IMPRISONED ?? (SURA 18:86-97) IF SO WHERE ? 14. WHERE IS THE IRON WALL BUILT BY DHUL QURNAIN BEHIND WHICH YAJUJ MAJUJ ARE TO BE SAID TO BE STILL IMPRISONED AS PER QURAN??
@@user-pc8oy7gl1g Your senile and illogical as well, cause you don’t even know what incarnation means, incarnation means when a superior being comes on inferior beings and merge with them who are part of creation and the creator is superior than the creation, which clearly means creator has to reduce their power to come on the lowly creation, cause creator's slightest power is enough to destroy the creation which is inferior and that's why its absurd and illogical cause if creator who has highest authority comes on earth in flesh then, who was managing the universe at the slightest moment? Cause creator has to reduce their power to come on earth which is a part of creation and, creator's power's slightest portion is enough to destroy the universe, that's why it’s illogical and absurd that you can't understand simple matter like this, not just that, your entities like shiva couldn’t even foresaw that mahisasur would cause ruckus even though he got he's third eye which can foresaw anything, whereas he couldn’t foresaw and Supreme Being is absolute who has no equals, all knowing.Whereas your triune gods are equal in your religion, which means none of them are god, cause Supreme Being has no equals and incomparable. Also your entities sleeps which clearly means they have limits, cause a being sleeps when their out of energy, which clearly puts them on limit whereas Supreme Being has no limits, and you can't add characteristics of human to the creator who is far superior than creation and everything within it.ruclips.net/video/sxAaiAUiUbM/видео.htmlsi=Ad8dkg8h7faCfWgcruclips.net/video/W2seyQe9YG4/видео.htmlsi=q0G2rNMPrT_EVgj9ruclips.net/video/sxAaiAUiUbM/видео.htmlsi=Hk4HyI-j0Ko08dSwruclips.net/video/n2AbrETkZLE/видео.htmlsi=JU2bFAtx0To95FlWruclips.net/video/abzZL_3Av2E/видео.htmlsi=i8GpmBQzhS_-HSeZruclips.net/video/qaJDeK2vGck/видео.htmlsi=MiZyaMrd4zVC5uFWruclips.net/video/6IYK_M3ACHI/видео.htmlsi=Wc8B6rgVty5oiBcSruclips.net/video/MJ0SCtoxGa4/видео.htmlsi=4Sb2UwySj375z0DHruclips.net/video/c2ovILc_sKY/видео.htmlsi=Fjj1qnhqXO6t5VuXruclips.net/video/BzAjOED3Kdg/видео.htmlsi=UImJHarRyMY7jGtvruclips.net/video/yYY1BGKrr1E/видео.htmlsi=_zXjy2mNn5um-999
@@user-pc8oy7gl1gYour senile, cause you don’t even know what incarnation means, incarnation means when a superior being comes on inferior beings and merge with them who are part of creation and the creator is superior than the creation, which clearly means creator has to reduce their power to come on the lowly creation, cause creator's slightest power is enough to destroy the creation which is inferior and that's why its absurd and illogical cause if creator who has highest authority comes on earth in flesh then, who was managing the universe at the slightest moment? Cause creator has to reduce their power to come on earth which is a part of creation and, creator's power's slightest portion is enough to destroy the universe, that's why it’s illogical and absurd that you can't understand simple matter like this, not just that, your entities like shiva couldn’t even foresaw that mahisasur would cause ruckus even though he got he's third eye which can foresaw anything, whereas he couldn’t foresaw and Supreme Being is absolute who has no equals, all knowing.Whereas your triune gods are equal in your religion, which means none of them are god, cause Supreme Being has no equals and incomparable. Also your entities sleeps which clearly means they have limits, cause a being sleeps when their out of energy, which clearly puts them on limit whereas Supreme Being has no limits, and you can't add characteristics of human to the creator who is far superior than creation and everything within it.ruclips.net/video/sxAaiAUiUbM/видео.htmlsi=Ad8dkg8h7faCfWgcruclips.net/video/W2seyQe9YG4/видео.htmlsi=q0G2rNMPrT_EVgj9ruclips.net/video/sxAaiAUiUbM/видео.htmlsi=Hk4HyI-j0Ko08dSwruclips.net/video/n2AbrETkZLE/видео.htmlsi=JU2bFAtx0To95FlWruclips.net/video/abzZL_3Av2E/видео.htmlsi=i8GpmBQzhS_-HSeZruclips.net/video/qaJDeK2vGck/видео.htmlsi=MiZyaMrd4zVC5uFWruclips.net/video/6IYK_M3ACHI/видео.htmlsi=Wc8B6rgVty5oiBcSruclips.net/video/MJ0SCtoxGa4/видео.htmlsi=4Sb2UwySj375z0DHruclips.net/video/c2ovILc_sKY/видео.htmlsi=Fjj1qnhqXO6t5VuXruclips.net/video/BzAjOED3Kdg/видео.htmlsi=UImJHarRyMY7jGtvruclips.net/video/yYY1BGKrr1E/видео.htmlsi=_zXjy2mNn5um-999
He has no understanding of Arabic yet wants to critique something he doesnt even begin to understand. They all come with a prepared script and vomit it out. As everyone knows its difficult to stop the process of vomiting once its started. When he knows that he is on thin ice he starts raising himself on his toes. So many of them start wild physical movements and get into a trance. This guys personality is restrained and as per his nature he starts making the tiny rasing himself on his feet movements. Do they think they are furthering their cause through these antics?
He's got a bone to pick with the Quran's use of "We" and "You" for different Aharuf, as if a pronoun party's going to shake up the entire doctrine! After all that, we have an entire passage (Story) that miraculously appears in the Bible now, claiming it's "irrelevant" because it doesn't rock the boat of Christianity's core doctrine! So, apparently, swapping "We" for "You" is the Islamic version of a cosmic mic drop! Ha! Classic.
Not sure they mean to do antics, their cognitive dissonance and mental blocks from years of brainwashing they actually believe they're right even if it's obvious to everyone else they're acting crazy. I thing it's why hasn't just go into preacher mode, they are trying to convince themselves by repeating church dogma like a mantra instead of accepting the truth.
Questions 1. WHERE IS INJIL IN QURAN TO PROVE CLAIM OF MUSLIMS ?? 2. WHERE IS TAWRAT IN QURAN TO PROVE CLAIM OF MUSLIMS ?? 3. WHERE IS ZABUR IN QURAN TO PROVE CLAIM OF MUSLIMS ?? 4. WHERE IS THE ORIGINAL QURAN ? 5. WHY DID UTHMAN BURN ALL ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPTS OF QURAN VARIANTS ?? 6. WHO TOLD UTHMAN TO CREATE HIS OWN OFFICIAL QURAN , WHICH YOU NOW FOLLOW BLINDLY, AS IF ITS FALLEN FROM HEAVEN ?? 7. DID ALLAH/ MOHAMMAD VERIFY UTHMANIC QURAN WHICH YOU USE NOW, AND CERTIFY IT ?? 8. WHEN WAS THE CERTIFICATION GIVEN BY ALLAH/MOHAMMAD TO PRESENT DAY QURAN ?? 9. IF THERE IS NO CERTIFICATION FROM ALLAH/MOHAMMAD TO UTHMANIC QURAN , HOW CAN THE SAME BE A DIVINE BOOK FROM ALLAH?? 10. IF QURAN IS TRUE THAN WHY IS UMMAH SPLIT INTO 73 SECTS, WHICH ARE FIGHTING AND KILLING EACH OTHER ?? 11. WHERE IS THE SOURCE OF MALE/FEMALE CIRCUMCISION IN QURAN ?? 12. DID MOHAMMAD AND ISHMAEL HAVE THEIR CIRCUMCISION AS PER LAW OF MUSA, TO BE IN LINEAGE WITH IBRAHIM, IF YES WHERE DOES IT SAY SO IN QURAN ?? 13. ARE YAJUJ MAJUJ STILL IMPRISONED ?? (SURA 18:86-97) IF SO WHERE ? 14. WHERE IS THE IRON WALL BUILT BY DHUL QURNAIN BEHIND WHICH YAJUJ MAJUJ ARE TO BE SAID TO BE STILL IMPRISONED AS PER QURAN??
@@user-pc8oy7gl1g Why are you asking all this in YT comments? You really think a scholar will answer here? Go to a local masjid or contact a scholar and get reliable information.
This man was hilarious, he spent the first 45 minutes stating that "verbal testimony" cannot be relied upon, when it comes to Quran and Ahadith. Then at 42:32, he says "We have sayings from church fathers substantiating the bible".
I don't understand why Uthman burn_ed the quran early, but there was still the oral tradition and Hafs q-n was taken later from oral tradition. So what happened to the Uthman q-n? Why take the Hafs? This is a contradiction.
@@Cross77774 He burned the false translations of Quran and banned transliteration in foreign languages except original language. As for your Masters like David Wood, Sam Simon, Mari Emmanuel etc,and their craps were destroyed long ago by SYFETalks who's not even a scholar.
@@SajedaBegum1 Actually, according to Shea he destroyed the q-n. Show me an Uthman q-n. Hafs did not have a good reputation, but his version was used. Why? I prefer Al Fadi, Jay Smith, Inspiring Philosophy, Thomas Alexander, Christian Luxenberg and others.
@@Cross77774 Most of the shia Hadiths are weak also find One message foundation, One message many prophets, Digital ummah,SYFETalks, Subhan Allah official in RUclips and clarify yourself by watching all the videos.As for your Masters like David wood, Sam Simon, Mari Emmanuel etc, and their craps were destroyed long ago by SYFETalks who's not even a scholar.
The level of hypocrisy of these people is just insane. The blatant lies they can utter without shame are on another level. Alhamdulillah for Islam. The historical proof in Islam is way more accurate than any other historical evidence provided from any other story.
Wallāhi, the more I hear these "debates" I believe this verse and that Islam is true. Al-Baqarah 2:18 صُمٌّۢ بُكْمٌ عُمْىٌ فَهُمْ لَا يَرْجِعُونَ Deaf, dumb and blind - so they will not return [to the right path].
@user-pc8oy7gl1g agreed. Well done brothers. This is the true essence of friendship, discussing meaningful topics, educating each other and loving each other for the sake of the creator. Bless you both brother Zeeshan and brother Paul.
15:35 the example given here is fire, it's describing the concept of Mutawateer reports in islam, even the non Muslim in the video said he would accept such mass transmitted news.
People be talking about wokenists & their historical revisionism, but completely ignored christianity & its historical revisionism for over 2 millennia!!!
Please do a video together, we would love to see you both duscussing how to prove the chain. This gentleman actually asked very good questions that were then answered in an excellent manner with proof. Made me understand and respect Islam even better.
Thanks for the upload, this shows the double standard of some insincere Christians when it comes to textual criticism, historical veracity, manuscripts of both Quran and Bible.
He's got a bone to pick with the Quran's use of "We" and "You" for different Aharuf, as if a pronoun party's going to shake up the entire doctrine! After all that, we have an entire passage (Story) that miraculously appears in the Bible now, claiming it's "irrelevant" because it doesn't rock the boat of Christianity's core doctrine! So, apparently, swapping "We" for "You" is the Islamic version of a cosmic mic drop! Ha! Classic.
Say, “Is it other than Allah I should desire as a lord while He is the Lord of all things? And every soul earns not except against itself, and no bearer of burdens will bear the burden of another. Then to your Lord is your return, and He will inform you concerning that over which you used to differ.” ~ Qur’an 6:164
It is interesting how some Christians focus on investigating the compilation of the Qur'an, including its origins and contributors, while paying little attention to the formation process of their own scriptures, deeming it "irrelevant". This behavior highlights an intriguing paradox: a desire to affirm their faith by critiquing Islam, potentially using it as a point of reference for truth? 🤔 Like Allah SWT said, it is not the eyes that are blind but the hearts...
Christian: "You can't prove the Quran has been preserved" Muslim: "Yes we can, it was memorized and written down from the beginning and we have chains of narration attesting to such" C: "Narrations can just be made up" Later when discussing biblical preservation C: "It doesn't matter that entire sections with key Christian doctrines are missing from the first complete manuscripts that come 350 years later" M: "Why doesn't it matter?" C: "Because we have quotations from early Christian apologists that attest to good preservation of the bible" I'm just not sure he is really hearing himself. Different standard of evidence, really.
The Birmingham folio is 100% identical to modern Qurans written in the same script. The orthographic debate is about when it was written. Some think within 2 decades of profet Muhammads passing, while others attribute it to the post Uthmanic period. The DNA isn't debated, the content isn't debated, the script and when it was written is. Within 2 decades or within 5.
Polish man discussing old Arabic, a language he doesn't know, in English, a language he doesn't have full comprehension of. With "evidence" from unknown or non-academic "sources". And with an actual scholar (Paul Williams) in front of him who has interviewed the people who investigated the folios in question, and still denying any given evidence.
I don't understand why Uthman burn_ed the quran early, but there was still the oral tradition and Hafs q-n was taken later from oral tradition. So what happened to the Uthman q-n? Why take the Hafs? This is a contradiction.
@@saifulisfree not a joke. It's known Paul is g*y but withholds it for the sake of allah. Allah grants you all your earthly desires so i hope allah give Paul all the er*ct ding a lings he wants in jannah.
Bear in mind that we are not just claiming things, we know who relayed what and who heard that from whom and who these people are, each corroborating each other's stories. And we honestly say when we doubt the authenticity of something even if we keep it in our collections. And this is the rigor of the hadith tradition. The Qur'an can't even be questioned. One person from one side of the world can correct another person on the other side of the world if he or she makes a mistake in reciting it and they don't even have to speak or understand Arabic. This is unprecedented. No faith community has committed their scripture to memory like this that is many cases in a completely different language than their mother tongue. We even know how to pronounce everything accurately. And even then we still have a full manuscript of the Qur'an carbon dated to the time of the prophet sws that is identical to any copy that we have today laying in the Birmingham Museum right now. You really would rather believe an entire civilization conned you even though the evidence is staring in your face? If we all were just making it up, how can people's compilations of hadith that are seperated by time and space turn out to be matching 98% or 70%? This is impossible unless we really genuinely tried to relay something exactly as we heard it at the very least. You are still welcome to think that we were collectively wasting our time with conserving lies, but that says more about you than about us.
That gentleman needs to work on his way of discussion, stop talking over people, listen more, and admit and concede the point, if he wants to have a fruitful dialogue. As Paul said if he is a truth seeker, he needs to think about what took place in this discussion.
It's irrelevant to him because he's avoiding from admitting about the nonexistence of his holy scripture from the 1st century BECAUSE it will destroy his whole argument from the get go and his ego refuses that to happen. Simple as that.
Funny enough in this very century we have found Hadith books that date to the Sahaba. The recently rediscovered Sahifa Hammam Ibn Munabbih who was Abu Hurayra’s student. Only 1 person between him and the Prophet (SAW) And it proves the Hadith’s found in Bukhari/Muslim/Tirmidi
Quranic compilation used both multiple oral testimonies of each Ayah, as well as manuscript evidences of each Ayah, all of which had to have been presented to the Prophet ﷺ in person to ensure accuracy. See Ulum al-Qur’an by Mufti Taqi Uthmani.
Zishan is really patient with this fella. Its apparent he is really biased. The bible itself would fail terribly if compared to the evidences of preservation of the Hadiths & Al Quran. This fella doesn't see it at all.
I really like it when another dawah brother from another channel cameos in. I love brother Paul more scholarly approach. I also love brother Zeeshan more witty approach.
Annoying guy locked in his paradigm and sadly unable to learn new information and allow it to affect his world view he is literally blinded by his own thinking
Of the 7-13 000 proclaimed hadith, 4400-4800 are counted as genuine because they have multiple chains attributed to them. Some Muslims consider only those hadith as genuine. Others accept hadith with singular chains if the narrator is considered trithful in other instances with hadith with multiple chains. This is my understanding as a non-Muslim. I'm open to being corrected.
Abū ‘Abd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Ismā‘īl ibn Ibrāhīm ibn al-Mughīrah ibn Bardizbah al-Ju‘fī al-Bukhārī has collected about 100 000 hadiths before his saheeh compilation projects and he concluded that 7563 reports are authentic.. can i ask for your source about 4800 hadiths that you mention?name of scholar etc...
@ahmadruzaini4646 You are correct. I was misremembering what Abd al-Razzaaq al-Sa'ani said about there being 4400 Musnad ahadith(ahadeeth). Read these things a long time ago. Most I can't remember, others I remember wrong. Not too proud to admit fault.
@@omarsyed1980 i was mistaken..imam bukhari collected about 300 000 hadith maybe more..i don't have knowledge about those he collected..sorry about that
He’s confusing Ahruf with Qiraat 7 Ahruf are how Allah revealed the Quran to help those with different accents or words to read and understand Islam. Qiraat are the 7-10 most popular readings of the Quran using any combination of the Ahruf. Even I can make my own Qiraat if I combine the Ahruf All these are preserved 😂 There are people who know the 10 Qiraat from memory. When he quotes the ayahs that have different meaning the meanings due to a word change they don’t contradict but add another level of context that build upon it. Very interesting to study
It's truly pathetic watching these Christians trying to act like they know our religion and history better than we do. And the intellectual inconsistency regarding the epistemology of testimony is truly staggering.
What do you expect to! A jewish or cristian as witness for event that happen in the time of Khulafaur Rashidin! So only by that happen, you will accept their witnessed, but reject witness from muslim side!
This is a great example of a person whose heart has been veiled by Allah due to their own choosing not wanting to accept the truth.
When he called Paul I was like this is already a beating now he is calling hulk 🤣🤣🤣
you make fun? Quran: 49:11 says other wise, you sin
We should not stoop to their low level brother.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@uta9944 i mean it is a beating if you defeat the argument. Beating of the argument.
@@naehalmulazim Just ignore some of these clowns at moments. You never know if it will be asked on yawm al qiyamah
Chrisitan Guy was trying to grill zeeshan on manuscripts and authenticity of narrators and then @ 39:00 he states “it is irrelevant” if resurrection is missing in the earliest full manuscript of the bible
Alhamdulilah (All praise be to God alone) for the light, truth and clarity of Islam
So I found out about those manuscripts. You guys can to. It's all a smoke screen .
He's got a bone to pick with the Quran's use of "We" and "You" for different Aharuf, as if a pronoun party's going to shake up the entire doctrine!
After all that, we have an entire passage (Story) that miraculously appears in the Bible now, claiming it's "irrelevant" because it doesn't rock the boat of Christianity's core doctrine!
So, apparently, swapping "We" for "You" is the Islamic version of a cosmic mic drop! Ha! Classic.
@@urstube6901 pronouns only affect lgbts
Questions
1. WHERE IS INJIL IN QURAN TO PROVE CLAIM OF MUSLIMS ??
2. WHERE IS TAWRAT IN QURAN TO PROVE CLAIM OF MUSLIMS ??
3. WHERE IS ZABUR IN QURAN TO PROVE CLAIM OF MUSLIMS ??
4. WHERE IS THE ORIGINAL QURAN ?
5. WHY DID UTHMAN BURN ALL ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPTS OF QURAN VARIANTS ??
6. WHO TOLD UTHMAN TO CREATE HIS OWN OFFICIAL QURAN , WHICH YOU NOW FOLLOW BLINDLY, AS IF ITS FALLEN FROM HEAVEN ??
7. DID ALLAH/ MOHAMMAD VERIFY UTHMANIC QURAN WHICH YOU USE NOW, AND CERTIFY IT ??
8. WHEN WAS THE CERTIFICATION GIVEN BY ALLAH/MOHAMMAD TO PRESENT DAY QURAN ??
9. IF THERE IS NO CERTIFICATION FROM ALLAH/MOHAMMAD TO UTHMANIC QURAN , HOW CAN THE SAME BE A
DIVINE BOOK FROM ALLAH??
10. IF QURAN IS TRUE THAN WHY IS UMMAH SPLIT INTO 73 SECTS, WHICH ARE FIGHTING AND KILLING EACH OTHER ??
11. WHERE IS THE SOURCE OF MALE/FEMALE CIRCUMCISION IN QURAN ??
12. DID MOHAMMAD AND ISHMAEL HAVE THEIR CIRCUMCISION AS PER LAW OF MUSA, TO BE IN LINEAGE WITH IBRAHIM, IF YES WHERE DOES IT SAY SO IN QURAN ??
13. ARE YAJUJ MAJUJ STILL IMPRISONED ?? (SURA 18:86-97) IF SO WHERE ?
14. WHERE IS THE IRON WALL BUILT BY DHUL QURNAIN BEHIND WHICH YAJUJ MAJUJ ARE TO BE SAID TO BE STILL IMPRISONED AS PER QURAN??
@@user-pc8oy7gl1g hopefully you will get an answer?? Doubtful tho
The insincerity and hypocrisy is next level with this one
Legit lol this guy is insane
brother has no issue in believing in bible that isnt preserved in its original language and earliest copy is 400 after jesus pbuh , yet he takes issues with fully chained narrations of hadith and quran that been scientifically carbon dated to the time of prophet , allah akbar the logic
We have accurate texts from the time of Hitler, Marx and Mao. But that doesn't mean the quran is true.
The way Paul hijacked the conversation was remarkable.
hes becoming a legend of our times God bless Paul
Can one imagine the amount of arrogance and hypocrisy required to criticize Hadith and the Chain of narration while at the same time accept the Bible....
Christianity comes with a personal revelation of Jesus Christ. Muslims just accept what a 7th century warlord said.
look up Hadith's that will embarrass a Muslim. Can you imagine following a religion that copied things from the bible and twisted them to follow Islam? The bible was here first, 500 years later Gabriel was sent by GOD to talk to Mohammad , why didn't GOD talk to him? And you say that GOD didn't speak thru Jesus??
Questions
1. WHERE IS INJIL IN QURAN TO PROVE CLAIM OF MUSLIMS ??
2. WHERE IS TAWRAT IN QURAN TO PROVE CLAIM OF MUSLIMS ??
3. WHERE IS ZABUR IN QURAN TO PROVE CLAIM OF MUSLIMS ??
4. WHERE IS THE ORIGINAL QURAN ?
5. WHY DID UTHMAN BURN ALL ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPTS OF QURAN VARIANTS ??
6. WHO TOLD UTHMAN TO CREATE HIS OWN OFFICIAL QURAN , WHICH YOU NOW FOLLOW BLINDLY, AS IF ITS FALLEN FROM HEAVEN ??
7. DID ALLAH/ MOHAMMAD VERIFY UTHMANIC QURAN WHICH YOU USE NOW, AND CERTIFY IT ??
8. WHEN WAS THE CERTIFICATION GIVEN BY ALLAH/MOHAMMAD TO PRESENT DAY QURAN ??
9. IF THERE IS NO CERTIFICATION FROM ALLAH/MOHAMMAD TO UTHMANIC QURAN , HOW CAN THE SAME BE A
DIVINE BOOK FROM ALLAH??
10. IF QURAN IS TRUE THAN WHY IS UMMAH SPLIT INTO 73 SECTS, WHICH ARE FIGHTING AND KILLING EACH OTHER ??
11. WHERE IS THE SOURCE OF MALE/FEMALE CIRCUMCISION IN QURAN ??
12. DID MOHAMMAD AND ISHMAEL HAVE THEIR CIRCUMCISION AS PER LAW OF MUSA, TO BE IN LINEAGE WITH IBRAHIM, IF YES WHERE DOES IT SAY SO IN QURAN ??
13. ARE YAJUJ MAJUJ STILL IMPRISONED ?? (SURA 18:86-97) IF SO WHERE ?
14. WHERE IS THE IRON WALL BUILT BY DHUL QURNAIN BEHIND WHICH YAJUJ MAJUJ ARE TO BE SAID TO BE STILL IMPRISONED AS PER QURAN??
Imagine the amount of arrogance and hypocrisy required to critized the New Testament when historians (scholars) recognize that the Gospel of Mark probably dates from c. AD 66-70, and the first epistle of Paul was probably written by the end of AD 52; Jesus being crucified (another thing no historian doubt about) in 33. I'll let you do the math. Muslims cannot say so of there own so called "Holy Book" ( which tend to be eaten by goats or burn by caliph) Have a great day.
The weakest Hadith is more reliable than the bible
Brother Paul! Good to see him here Alhamdulillah
He was with Daniel Haqiqatoju one time
Questions
1. WHERE IS INJIL IN QURAN TO PROVE CLAIM OF MUSLIMS ??
2. WHERE IS TAWRAT IN QURAN TO PROVE CLAIM OF MUSLIMS ??
3. WHERE IS ZABUR IN QURAN TO PROVE CLAIM OF MUSLIMS ??
4. WHERE IS THE ORIGINAL QURAN ?
5. WHY DID UTHMAN BURN ALL ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPTS OF QURAN VARIANTS ??
6. WHO TOLD UTHMAN TO CREATE HIS OWN OFFICIAL QURAN , WHICH YOU NOW FOLLOW BLINDLY, AS IF ITS FALLEN FROM HEAVEN ??
7. DID ALLAH/ MOHAMMAD VERIFY UTHMANIC QURAN WHICH YOU USE NOW, AND CERTIFY IT ??
8. WHEN WAS THE CERTIFICATION GIVEN BY ALLAH/MOHAMMAD TO PRESENT DAY QURAN ??
9. IF THERE IS NO CERTIFICATION FROM ALLAH/MOHAMMAD TO UTHMANIC QURAN , HOW CAN THE SAME BE A
DIVINE BOOK FROM ALLAH??
10. IF QURAN IS TRUE THAN WHY IS UMMAH SPLIT INTO 73 SECTS, WHICH ARE FIGHTING AND KILLING EACH OTHER ??
11. WHERE IS THE SOURCE OF MALE/FEMALE CIRCUMCISION IN QURAN ??
12. DID MOHAMMAD AND ISHMAEL HAVE THEIR CIRCUMCISION AS PER LAW OF MUSA, TO BE IN LINEAGE WITH IBRAHIM, IF YES WHERE DOES IT SAY SO IN QURAN ??
13. ARE YAJUJ MAJUJ STILL IMPRISONED ?? (SURA 18:86-97) IF SO WHERE ?
14. WHERE IS THE IRON WALL BUILT BY DHUL QURNAIN BEHIND WHICH YAJUJ MAJUJ ARE TO BE SAID TO BE STILL IMPRISONED AS PER QURAN??
A self proclaimed gay, expect him to be where only where men are around 😂😂
@@user-pc8oy7gl1g you know these answers already
I love paul’s energy, he’s a true muslim brother 😂😂
you also sin Quran 49;11 mocking
Questions
1. WHERE IS INJIL IN QURAN TO PROVE CLAIM OF MUSLIMS ??
2. WHERE IS TAWRAT IN QURAN TO PROVE CLAIM OF MUSLIMS ??
3. WHERE IS ZABUR IN QURAN TO PROVE CLAIM OF MUSLIMS ??
4. WHERE IS THE ORIGINAL QURAN ?
5. WHY DID UTHMAN BURN ALL ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPTS OF QURAN VARIANTS ??
6. WHO TOLD UTHMAN TO CREATE HIS OWN OFFICIAL QURAN , WHICH YOU NOW FOLLOW BLINDLY, AS IF ITS FALLEN FROM HEAVEN ??
7. DID ALLAH/ MOHAMMAD VERIFY UTHMANIC QURAN WHICH YOU USE NOW, AND CERTIFY IT ??
8. WHEN WAS THE CERTIFICATION GIVEN BY ALLAH/MOHAMMAD TO PRESENT DAY QURAN ??
9. IF THERE IS NO CERTIFICATION FROM ALLAH/MOHAMMAD TO UTHMANIC QURAN , HOW CAN THE SAME BE A
DIVINE BOOK FROM ALLAH??
10. IF QURAN IS TRUE THAN WHY IS UMMAH SPLIT INTO 73 SECTS, WHICH ARE FIGHTING AND KILLING EACH OTHER ??
11. WHERE IS THE SOURCE OF MALE/FEMALE CIRCUMCISION IN QURAN ??
12. DID MOHAMMAD AND ISHMAEL HAVE THEIR CIRCUMCISION AS PER LAW OF MUSA, TO BE IN LINEAGE WITH IBRAHIM, IF YES WHERE DOES IT SAY SO IN QURAN ??
13. ARE YAJUJ MAJUJ STILL IMPRISONED ?? (SURA 18:86-97) IF SO WHERE ?
14. WHERE IS THE IRON WALL BUILT BY DHUL QURNAIN BEHIND WHICH YAJUJ MAJUJ ARE TO BE SAID TO BE STILL IMPRISONED AS PER QURAN??
@@user-pc8oy7gl1g Your senile and illogical as well, cause you don’t even know what incarnation means, incarnation means when a superior being comes on inferior beings and merge with them who are part of creation and the creator is superior than the creation, which clearly means creator has to reduce their power to come on the lowly creation, cause creator's slightest power is enough to destroy the creation which is inferior and that's why its absurd and illogical cause if creator who has highest authority comes on earth in flesh then, who was managing the universe at the slightest moment? Cause creator has to reduce their power to come on earth which is a part of creation and, creator's power's slightest portion is enough to destroy the universe, that's why it’s illogical and absurd that you can't understand simple matter like this, not just that, your entities like shiva couldn’t even foresaw that mahisasur would cause ruckus even though he got he's third eye which can foresaw anything, whereas he couldn’t foresaw and Supreme Being is absolute who has no equals, all knowing.Whereas your triune gods are equal in your religion, which means none of them are god, cause Supreme Being has no equals and incomparable. Also your entities sleeps which clearly means they have limits, cause a being sleeps when their out of energy, which clearly puts them on limit whereas Supreme Being has no limits, and you can't add characteristics of human to the creator who is far superior than creation and everything within it.ruclips.net/video/sxAaiAUiUbM/видео.htmlsi=Ad8dkg8h7faCfWgcruclips.net/video/W2seyQe9YG4/видео.htmlsi=q0G2rNMPrT_EVgj9ruclips.net/video/sxAaiAUiUbM/видео.htmlsi=Hk4HyI-j0Ko08dSwruclips.net/video/n2AbrETkZLE/видео.htmlsi=JU2bFAtx0To95FlWruclips.net/video/abzZL_3Av2E/видео.htmlsi=i8GpmBQzhS_-HSeZruclips.net/video/qaJDeK2vGck/видео.htmlsi=MiZyaMrd4zVC5uFWruclips.net/video/6IYK_M3ACHI/видео.htmlsi=Wc8B6rgVty5oiBcSruclips.net/video/MJ0SCtoxGa4/видео.htmlsi=4Sb2UwySj375z0DHruclips.net/video/c2ovILc_sKY/видео.htmlsi=Fjj1qnhqXO6t5VuXruclips.net/video/BzAjOED3Kdg/видео.htmlsi=UImJHarRyMY7jGtvruclips.net/video/yYY1BGKrr1E/видео.htmlsi=_zXjy2mNn5um-999
@@user-pc8oy7gl1gYour senile, cause you don’t even know what incarnation means, incarnation means when a superior being comes on inferior beings and merge with them who are part of creation and the creator is superior than the creation, which clearly means creator has to reduce their power to come on the lowly creation, cause creator's slightest power is enough to destroy the creation which is inferior and that's why its absurd and illogical cause if creator who has highest authority comes on earth in flesh then, who was managing the universe at the slightest moment? Cause creator has to reduce their power to come on earth which is a part of creation and, creator's power's slightest portion is enough to destroy the universe, that's why it’s illogical and absurd that you can't understand simple matter like this, not just that, your entities like shiva couldn’t even foresaw that mahisasur would cause ruckus even though he got he's third eye which can foresaw anything, whereas he couldn’t foresaw and Supreme Being is absolute who has no equals, all knowing.Whereas your triune gods are equal in your religion, which means none of them are god, cause Supreme Being has no equals and incomparable. Also your entities sleeps which clearly means they have limits, cause a being sleeps when their out of energy, which clearly puts them on limit whereas Supreme Being has no limits, and you can't add characteristics of human to the creator who is far superior than creation and everything within it.ruclips.net/video/sxAaiAUiUbM/видео.htmlsi=Ad8dkg8h7faCfWgcruclips.net/video/W2seyQe9YG4/видео.htmlsi=q0G2rNMPrT_EVgj9ruclips.net/video/sxAaiAUiUbM/видео.htmlsi=Hk4HyI-j0Ko08dSwruclips.net/video/n2AbrETkZLE/видео.htmlsi=JU2bFAtx0To95FlWruclips.net/video/abzZL_3Av2E/видео.htmlsi=i8GpmBQzhS_-HSeZruclips.net/video/qaJDeK2vGck/видео.htmlsi=MiZyaMrd4zVC5uFWruclips.net/video/6IYK_M3ACHI/видео.htmlsi=Wc8B6rgVty5oiBcSruclips.net/video/MJ0SCtoxGa4/видео.htmlsi=4Sb2UwySj375z0DHruclips.net/video/c2ovILc_sKY/видео.htmlsi=Fjj1qnhqXO6t5VuXruclips.net/video/BzAjOED3Kdg/видео.htmlsi=UImJHarRyMY7jGtvruclips.net/video/yYY1BGKrr1E/видео.htmlsi=_zXjy2mNn5um-999
@@user-cd9gk7lj9pWe know.
He has no understanding of Arabic yet wants to critique something he doesnt even begin to understand.
They all come with a prepared script and vomit it out. As everyone knows its difficult to stop the process of vomiting once its started.
When he knows that he is on thin ice he starts raising himself on his toes. So many of them start wild physical movements and get into a trance. This guys personality is restrained and as per his nature he starts making the tiny rasing himself on his feet movements.
Do they think they are furthering their cause through these antics?
i call it self induced retardation
He's got a bone to pick with the Quran's use of "We" and "You" for different Aharuf, as if a pronoun party's going to shake up the entire doctrine!
After all that, we have an entire passage (Story) that miraculously appears in the Bible now, claiming it's "irrelevant" because it doesn't rock the boat of Christianity's core doctrine!
So, apparently, swapping "We" for "You" is the Islamic version of a cosmic mic drop! Ha! Classic.
Not sure they mean to do antics, their cognitive dissonance and mental blocks from years of brainwashing they actually believe they're right even if it's obvious to everyone else they're acting crazy. I thing it's why hasn't just go into preacher mode, they are trying to convince themselves by repeating church dogma like a mantra instead of accepting the truth.
Following this guy's logic we should erase history as a science, because we don't have the time machine to ask all those people face to face. LOL
and then following this guy's logic, his whole faith is a lie.
so instead look up, An evolutionary time line fo HOMO SAPIENS.
Questions
1. WHERE IS INJIL IN QURAN TO PROVE CLAIM OF MUSLIMS ??
2. WHERE IS TAWRAT IN QURAN TO PROVE CLAIM OF MUSLIMS ??
3. WHERE IS ZABUR IN QURAN TO PROVE CLAIM OF MUSLIMS ??
4. WHERE IS THE ORIGINAL QURAN ?
5. WHY DID UTHMAN BURN ALL ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPTS OF QURAN VARIANTS ??
6. WHO TOLD UTHMAN TO CREATE HIS OWN OFFICIAL QURAN , WHICH YOU NOW FOLLOW BLINDLY, AS IF ITS FALLEN FROM HEAVEN ??
7. DID ALLAH/ MOHAMMAD VERIFY UTHMANIC QURAN WHICH YOU USE NOW, AND CERTIFY IT ??
8. WHEN WAS THE CERTIFICATION GIVEN BY ALLAH/MOHAMMAD TO PRESENT DAY QURAN ??
9. IF THERE IS NO CERTIFICATION FROM ALLAH/MOHAMMAD TO UTHMANIC QURAN , HOW CAN THE SAME BE A
DIVINE BOOK FROM ALLAH??
10. IF QURAN IS TRUE THAN WHY IS UMMAH SPLIT INTO 73 SECTS, WHICH ARE FIGHTING AND KILLING EACH OTHER ??
11. WHERE IS THE SOURCE OF MALE/FEMALE CIRCUMCISION IN QURAN ??
12. DID MOHAMMAD AND ISHMAEL HAVE THEIR CIRCUMCISION AS PER LAW OF MUSA, TO BE IN LINEAGE WITH IBRAHIM, IF YES WHERE DOES IT SAY SO IN QURAN ??
13. ARE YAJUJ MAJUJ STILL IMPRISONED ?? (SURA 18:86-97) IF SO WHERE ?
14. WHERE IS THE IRON WALL BUILT BY DHUL QURNAIN BEHIND WHICH YAJUJ MAJUJ ARE TO BE SAID TO BE STILL IMPRISONED AS PER QURAN??
@@user-pc8oy7gl1g Why are you asking all this in YT comments? You really think a scholar will answer here? Go to a local masjid or contact a scholar and get reliable information.
@@David-fq5un don't entertain, just a troll.
This man was hilarious, he spent the first 45 minutes stating that "verbal testimony" cannot be relied upon, when it comes to Quran and Ahadith. Then at 42:32, he says "We have sayings from church fathers substantiating the bible".
The hypocrisy is strong with this one.
I don't understand why Uthman burn_ed the quran early, but there was still the oral tradition and Hafs q-n was taken later from oral tradition. So what happened to the Uthman q-n? Why take the Hafs? This is a contradiction.
@@Cross77774 He burned the false translations of Quran and banned transliteration in foreign languages except original language. As for your Masters like David Wood, Sam Simon, Mari Emmanuel etc,and their craps were destroyed long ago by SYFETalks who's not even a scholar.
@@SajedaBegum1 Actually, according to Shea he destroyed the q-n. Show me an Uthman q-n. Hafs did not have a good reputation, but his version was used. Why? I prefer Al Fadi, Jay Smith, Inspiring Philosophy, Thomas Alexander, Christian Luxenberg and others.
@@Cross77774 Most of the shia Hadiths are weak also find One message foundation, One message many prophets, Digital ummah,SYFETalks, Subhan Allah official in RUclips and clarify yourself by watching all the videos.As for your Masters like David wood, Sam Simon, Mari Emmanuel etc, and their craps were destroyed long ago by SYFETalks who's not even a scholar.
Man, it's rare seeing Paul out there! Definitely need more of Paul in speakers corner. He has so much knowledge.
The crossover we didn't ask, but we needed!
The level of hypocrisy of these people is just insane. The blatant lies they can utter without shame are on another level. Alhamdulillah for Islam. The historical proof in Islam is way more accurate than any other historical evidence provided from any other story.
Wallāhi, the more I hear these "debates" I believe this verse and that Islam is true.
Al-Baqarah 2:18
صُمٌّۢ بُكْمٌ عُمْىٌ فَهُمْ لَا يَرْجِعُونَ
Deaf, dumb and blind - so they will not return [to the right path].
It pains his eardrum when Paul exposed his dishonesty 😁
He came, destroyed the guy then he left. What a legend Paul ❤
Graduated from wikipedia and google.
God have mercy on the soul of every Muslim at Speakers Corner.
what about all the others? So you practice discrimination. Just like Islam teaches you?
Ameen ya rabbil alameen.
@@user-cd9gk7lj9p so u cant specify anyone in your dua? What u on about.
@@user-cd9gk7lj9p Non Muslims don't believe in God. Why would pray for their blessing if they don't even believe in it??
@@user-cd9gk7lj9pstop blaming him 😭😭 he just wants the muslims at speakers corner to be good
Great to see blogging theology and smile 2 jannah collaboration 😊😊
Inshallah you guys do a video soon 😊
Yeah, two men who are really in love with one another??
@user-pc8oy7gl1g agreed. Well done brothers. This is the true essence of friendship, discussing meaningful topics, educating each other and loving each other for the sake of the creator. Bless you both brother Zeeshan and brother Paul.
15:35 the example given here is fire, it's describing the concept of Mutawateer reports in islam, even the non Muslim in the video said he would accept such mass transmitted news.
Brother Paul is on 🔥and this guy's mind is 🤯
People be talking about wokenists & their historical revisionism, but completely ignored christianity & its historical revisionism for over 2 millennia!!!
This guy doesn't seem sincere to me tbh. big up Zeeshan and Paul!
Yeah...he just wants to spout his script without any interruptions...but he'll interrupt whenever he wants and spout slander.
The ending is hysterical, I don't know how you can just ignore him and have a side conversation 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Being over smart is a real problem.. being humble and polite is tough ❤
That last part was really painful and sad to watch. He kept talking whilst nobody listening because of his obvious insincerity.
This Christian guy has a hard time making eye contact. I wonder why… people only do that when they don’t have confidence or is lying.
This guy's entire position against Islam is "I don't believe history". Why do our brothers waste time on these kinds of people.
Please do a video together, we would love to see you both duscussing how to prove the chain. This gentleman actually asked very good questions that were then answered in an excellent manner with proof. Made me understand and respect Islam even better.
he complains about the guy talking over him, but then he does the same..what a hypocrite.
Paul is level 20 now when In Islamic debate compared to before
Compared to when? Did he not do Islamic debate before?
14:30 If he is this skeptical why does he believe in biblical text?
Thanks for the upload, this shows the double standard of some insincere Christians when it comes to textual criticism, historical veracity, manuscripts of both Quran and Bible.
hey unexpected blogging theology cameo, nice!
Chain of narration is the original block chain
The theoretical “Nail in the Coffin” was when Brother Zeeshan said “it could have been written by John Cena” 😂
I hope our Christian brothers wake up to the corruptions in their Bible.
And the Qur'an the book of satan given to Muslims
@@user-sl1tx7uc2y The same book of Satan that says to worship God and not follow Satan 😅
He comes to seek a problem. He keeps asking and arguing every answer given. Never satisfied with every prove and evidence given.
The xtian guy is a walking bible, full of contradiction
He's got a bone to pick with the Quran's use of "We" and "You" for different Aharuf, as if a pronoun party's going to shake up the entire doctrine!
After all that, we have an entire passage (Story) that miraculously appears in the Bible now, claiming it's "irrelevant" because it doesn't rock the boat of Christianity's core doctrine!
So, apparently, swapping "We" for "You" is the Islamic version of a cosmic mic drop! Ha! Classic.
Thanks ALLAH for Islam
Big Paul- big up yaself man
Memorising a pack of lies doesn’t make them true .
Say, “Is it other than Allah I should desire as a lord while He is the Lord of all things? And every soul earns not except against itself, and no bearer of burdens will bear the burden of another. Then to your Lord is your return, and He will inform you concerning that over which you used to differ.” ~ Qur’an 6:164
It is interesting how some Christians focus on investigating the compilation of the Qur'an, including its origins and contributors, while paying little attention to the formation process of their own scriptures, deeming it "irrelevant".
This behavior highlights an intriguing paradox: a desire to affirm their faith by critiquing Islam, potentially using it as a point of reference for truth? 🤔
Like Allah SWT said, it is not the eyes that are blind but the hearts...
Zeeshan: "Let Paul cook! He's cooking!" XD
It's funny that the Polish guy gets frustrated when PW speaks over him, when he kept on preaching without letting others rebut for 1 hour.
MasyaAllah, good to see you with Paul
Christian: "You can't prove the Quran has been preserved"
Muslim: "Yes we can, it was memorized and written down from the beginning and we have chains of narration attesting to such"
C: "Narrations can just be made up"
Later when discussing biblical preservation
C: "It doesn't matter that entire sections with key Christian doctrines are missing from the first complete manuscripts that come 350 years later"
M: "Why doesn't it matter?"
C: "Because we have quotations from early Christian apologists that attest to good preservation of the bible"
I'm just not sure he is really hearing himself. Different standard of evidence, really.
Jazaak Allahu khairan.
Baraka lahu fik brother Z
The Birmingham folio is 100% identical to modern Qurans written in the same script.
The orthographic debate is about when it was written. Some think within 2 decades of profet Muhammads passing, while others attribute it to the post Uthmanic period.
The DNA isn't debated, the content isn't debated, the script and when it was written is. Within 2 decades or within 5.
Polish man discussing old Arabic, a language he doesn't know, in English, a language he doesn't have full comprehension of.
With "evidence" from unknown or non-academic "sources".
And with an actual scholar (Paul Williams) in front of him who has interviewed the people who investigated the folios in question, and still denying any given evidence.
Jeeez the second hand embarrassment
Dude was still talking while zeeshan and paul were saying goodbye to each other after burying this guy 😂
I don't understand why Uthman burn_ed the quran early, but there was still the oral tradition and Hafs q-n was taken later from oral tradition. So what happened to the Uthman q-n? Why take the Hafs? This is a contradiction.
May allah grant brother Paul all of his earthly desires in Jannah.
A harem of men.
When arguments are presented and they are responded by insults, we know that the arguments were powerful. Alhamdoulilah
😂 only clowns make jokes when they can’t respond.
@@saifulisfree not a joke. It's known Paul is g*y but withholds it for the sake of allah.
Allah grants you all your earthly desires so i hope allah give Paul all the er*ct ding a lings he wants in jannah.
I'm sorry you couldn't respond to the argument and instead brought to surface your evil inclinations in the form of this comment.
@@spatel353 respond to what argument lol? Mohammed is a pedo?
Bear in mind that we are not just claiming things, we know who relayed what and who heard that from whom and who these people are, each corroborating each other's stories. And we honestly say when we doubt the authenticity of something even if we keep it in our collections. And this is the rigor of the hadith tradition.
The Qur'an can't even be questioned. One person from one side of the world can correct another person on the other side of the world if he or she makes a mistake in reciting it and they don't even have to speak or understand Arabic. This is unprecedented. No faith community has committed their scripture to memory like this that is many cases in a completely different language than their mother tongue. We even know how to pronounce everything accurately. And even then we still have a full manuscript of the Qur'an carbon dated to the time of the prophet sws that is identical to any copy that we have today laying in the Birmingham Museum right now.
You really would rather believe an entire civilization conned you even though the evidence is staring in your face? If we all were just making it up, how can people's compilations of hadith that are seperated by time and space turn out to be matching 98% or 70%? This is impossible unless we really genuinely tried to relay something exactly as we heard it at the very least.
You are still welcome to think that we were collectively wasting our time with conserving lies, but that says more about you than about us.
I didnt know that the resurrection was added😮 .
First time I've seen Paul. Enjoyed his dialogue thoroughly.
Brother Paul Williams ✊🏾
Alhamdulillah for Islam
What is mind blowing is, Matthew and Luke copied from Mark, but Mark never wrote it, destroy my brain cell instantly
Matching a pack of
Lies fifty years after
An
Alledge account doesn’t make
It true 😂😂😂😂
That gentleman needs to work on his way of discussion, stop talking over people, listen more, and admit and concede the point, if he wants to have a fruitful dialogue. As Paul said if he is a truth seeker, he needs to think about what took place in this discussion.
Z is so polite with these insincere and hypocritical rude Christians... Paul is more... HULK SMASH... I got secondhand embarrassment lol
It's irrelevant to him because he's avoiding from admitting about the nonexistence of his holy scripture from the 1st century BECAUSE it will destroy his whole argument from the get go and his ego refuses that to happen.
Simple as that.
Funny enough in this very century we have found Hadith books that date to the Sahaba. The recently rediscovered Sahifa Hammam Ibn Munabbih who was Abu Hurayra’s student. Only 1 person between him and the Prophet (SAW)
And it proves the Hadith’s found in Bukhari/Muslim/Tirmidi
Quranic compilation used both multiple oral testimonies of each Ayah, as well as manuscript evidences of each Ayah, all of which had to have been presented to the Prophet ﷺ in person to ensure accuracy. See Ulum al-Qur’an by Mufti Taqi Uthmani.
they worked him well he won't forget that day he got educated in 😎 mashallah
Alhamdulillah i'm so proud to be Muslim and Islam and i'm proud Bosnian Allahu akbar ☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️.
The guy is clueless
Bro is a robot 🤖 malfunctioning
Zishan is really patient with this fella. Its apparent he is really biased. The bible itself would fail terribly if compared to the evidences of preservation of the Hadiths & Al Quran.
This fella doesn't see it at all.
so he accepts evidence by some random muslims but not scholars?
did he expect christian to preserved the quran ? 😂 ..
we have zero manuscripts of christianity in the first century but some guy from train station said something
I came here to see Mr. Paul
I really like it when another dawah brother from another channel cameos in.
I love brother Paul more scholarly approach.
I also love brother Zeeshan more witty approach.
It's so funny watching someone who just does not want to accept the truth even though every reasonable reason is given to them
Annoying guy locked in his paradigm and sadly unable to learn new information and allow it to affect his world view he is literally blinded by his own thinking
Of the 7-13 000 proclaimed hadith, 4400-4800 are counted as genuine because they have multiple chains attributed to them. Some Muslims consider only those hadith as genuine.
Others accept hadith with singular chains if the narrator is considered trithful in other instances with hadith with multiple chains.
This is my understanding as a non-Muslim.
I'm open to being corrected.
Abū ‘Abd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Ismā‘īl ibn Ibrāhīm ibn al-Mughīrah ibn Bardizbah al-Ju‘fī al-Bukhārī has collected about 100 000 hadiths before his saheeh compilation projects and he concluded that 7563 reports are authentic..
can i ask for your source about 4800 hadiths that you mention?name of scholar etc...
@ahmadruzaini4646
You are correct.
I was misremembering what Abd al-Razzaaq al-Sa'ani said about there being 4400 Musnad ahadith(ahadeeth).
Read these things a long time ago. Most I can't remember, others I remember wrong.
Not too proud to admit fault.
@@omarsyed1980 i think you implied sunan abu dawood according to the number that you gave..
@@omarsyed1980 i was mistaken..imam bukhari collected about 300 000 hadith maybe more..i don't have knowledge about those he collected..sorry about that
@@omarsyed1980 if 4400 musnad meaning 4400 person narrators that traced back to the prophet SAW..
When brother Paul starts cooking this guy is obviously have regrets and go on useless rant
16:41 get’em
He got cornered in speakers corner whatta the odds
Cooked!
Technical knockout😊
He’s confusing Ahruf with Qiraat
7 Ahruf are how Allah revealed the Quran to help those with different accents or words to read and understand Islam.
Qiraat are the 7-10 most popular readings of the Quran using any combination of the Ahruf. Even I can make my own Qiraat if I combine the Ahruf
All these are preserved 😂 There are people who know the 10 Qiraat from memory.
When he quotes the ayahs that have different meaning the meanings due to a word change they don’t contradict but add another level of context that build upon it. Very interesting to study
18:15 was so funny 😂😂
Could be John cena 😂😂
Double standards.
orang ini mblunder😢😢😢
Zeehan sdh keren jawabannya😅
Amin 🤲
Brother Peter 👏
this guy is a total hypocrite 😂😂
It's truly pathetic watching these Christians trying to act like they know our religion and history better than we do. And the intellectual inconsistency regarding the epistemology of testimony is truly staggering.
What do you expect to!
A jewish or cristian as witness for event that happen in the time of Khulafaur Rashidin! So only by that happen, you will accept their witnessed, but reject witness from muslim side!
Why so many christian wright now love saying "is doesn't matter" like his love LGBT.
the argument was bad it's on his extra channel 🤣
funny when a christian questions authenticity when his book is just gossip