Chuck is irreplaceable. It’s so good to see him introduced each and every time. Don’t get me wrong Neal brings the knowledge but the duo of them both is what makes Star Talk so entertaining and fascinating.
@@djdaddy8080 I love that show. I literally think it shows what our planet and human race will be doing in 1000 years from now. Only unrealistic thing are the propulsion systems the ships use. Rocket propulsion will not get us anywhere in space. What they should be showing is the alternative systems used by the black projects from various countries. Believe me when I say the silent crafts we see flying around are real and use exotic materials combined with a very different form of propulsion.
gotta love chuck for referencing the Expanse, with the 'inter-planetary terrorist', Brilliant show anyone that hasn't watched it, even better series of books. love this channel and love the work you all do.
My only concern with DART is the space objects that we don’t see. There is a ton of objects in the solar system. The fact that our planet hasn’t had a facelift in a long time is amazing.
I was thinking the same, so much is going on the Interstellar space, I haven't forgotten the omuamua yet, we don't know how long for the Jupiter is going to protect us, we have plans for decades but don't know what the Nasa will reveal the very next morning, we are doomed....
Hey man, I've never commented on anything before but I am compelled to applaud and thank you for your attempt to remind us of the utter imperativeness (not a word apparently, but should be) of embracing the scientific method again. I'm referring to your new book, which I haven't read but can tell instantly from your interview at MSNBC with the dude that's bad at math, that your intentions are to re-establish the sanctity of truth, because anything other than the truth only adds to the confusion. I share your reverence for truth. Something that should be so self evident isn't and we all need to hear it.
My feeling is that we need not worry so much from asteroids destroying our planet but worry more about some of our crazy leaders of some countries of our planet.
If NASA mounted a mission to deflect an asteroid headed for an impact with earth and didn't want to panic the public, what would the perfect cover story be?
I was lucky enough to get an invite for myself and my father in-law to a viewing event on Mon night at the John Hopkins Applied Physics Lab for the DART impact. Very excited to hear some of the guest speakers and see the telemetry roll in before I head down to the Cape the next morning for my own launch exercise.
I recall a rather large meteor that flew through Russia a few years ago that took everyone by surprise. Everyone was focused on DA14 asteroid. Is that because it wasn't large enough to be consider a real threat?
And such impacting sea would cause rains and tsunami. As it has happened in past several times. Surface of the moon is good examplee of amount there is rocks flying around. Moon receives every hit on its surface, and older hits will just and only disappear by hits coming after, covering older ones
The Earth is hit by about 6,000 meteors (large enough to reach the ground) and about 17,000 meteorites each year. It's inevitable that an asteroid hitting Earth WILL happen eventually.
@@nyc220guy so, moon is hit about 1/4 of that amount per day, and every bit hits the surface. Now build a base in there.. :) wonder how many hits ISS has received already, or satellites, which in turn, creates more debris that can hit other gear up there
If we can collect debris along the way, then we can make the interaction more effective without lifting that mass from earth. Also, today most cameras use CMOS sensors instead of CCDs.. CCDs still have cleaner signals so most research instruments still use them; however, CMOS technology is improving and it is possible that this also will soon change.
I think we definitely have the ability to deflect an asteroid. Of course it depends on the astroid's path, its mass, timing, etc., but it will also take a significant international effort.
I'd speculate that even if we were masters at asteroid deflection, we wouldn't be able to detect all of the big fast ones coming our way. Especially the ones moving thousands of miles an hour.
Could you explain the aiming more? This seems harder than firing two guns a mile from each other and having the bullets collide. Aren’t those rocks coming way faster than an F22?
So with our current observational capabilities, how long would we need to detect a previously unknown object coming through or from the Oort Cloud heading directly to earth? Could we miss it for a couple years after leaving the Oort Cloud towards us?
No, the energy imparted is a function of mass and velocity and the mass wouldn't change if it were broken into small pieces. The destruction would look very different but the effect would be the same.
Due to my general lack of knowledge about these things, if we mildly change this situation’s orbit, could it possibly end up crashing into Mars around the time we get there?
@aDBo'Ch 1 No , I am no genius, i may have a talent for being able to have multiple concurrent thoughts, but this is a channel with NGT , Chuck and ...here Lindley. I am a minnow in their waters, to the extent that I do not know what point you are making.
Hi @Startalk! Recently we all know that DART mission was successful. Also Apophis recently passed Earth and returning in 7 years. Could DART mission be used on Apophis?
In the Expanse not only does the protagonist move the asteroid. He attaches stealth technology to is so we don’t notice the asteroid until it is way too late.
You always hear the term just outside of our solar system meaning past the furthest planet in orbit but what about above and below our solar system? 🤔🌍📡
If anyone is curious, 4 miles per second which is the speed that dart travelled at, calculates to 14,400 miles per hour. To convert miles per second to miles per hour, simply take the miles per second and multiply it by 3600. The reason is that there are 3600 seconds in one hour.
yes : all you gotta do is push it enough off coarse ,or off the trajectory towards the earth and size plays a factor as well ,but yes it's within our power to do
I expect NASA will have a long road ahead turning this science into a real planetary defense. Given the project approval in June of 2017 and study on the pair of asteroids began in 2003. It is difficult to imagine this sort of mission as an emergency response to a newly discovered threat. One has to wonder at what distances must we detect these threats in order to mount a defense?
What if a black hole collides with a neutron star and sends gravitational waves strong enough to change our reality of space and time? Will we live in a slower world? Fascinating i love science
Unless it hits directly in line with the center of mass of the asteroid... the asteroid will just rotate about it's center of mass. With very little change in it's velocity.
Plan for the worst, and actually do something constructive to alleviate the possibility. Can we use the same logic to remove the potential for Planetary Destruction here on Earth?
Watch NASA's Live Coverage of the DART Mission: ruclips.net/video/-6Z1E0mW2ag/видео.html
T minus 45 Minutes to impact !!!
What great close-up shots before impact!
@@TheChiefGeek I was waiting to see a windshield or a ship, deep inside me I was hoping to see something like that
I watched it live last night. We are making great strides in science. These are truly exciting times.
Trumps space force is actual a good idea
Chuck is irreplaceable. It’s so good to see him introduced each and every time. Don’t get me wrong Neal brings the knowledge but the duo of them both is what makes Star Talk so entertaining and fascinating.
Cosmic balance is restored
100% it’s awesome to have a show where we can laugh and learn at the same time
Plus he’s an Expanse fan so there’s bonus points there
Chuck is an embarrassment to comedians and constantly interrupts with his played out jokes
@@djdaddy8080 I love that show. I literally think it shows what our planet and human race will be doing in 1000 years from now. Only unrealistic thing are the propulsion systems the ships use. Rocket propulsion will not get us anywhere in space. What they should be showing is the alternative systems used by the black projects from various countries. Believe me when I say the silent crafts we see flying around are real and use exotic materials combined with a very different form of propulsion.
gotta love chuck for referencing the Expanse, with the 'inter-planetary terrorist', Brilliant show anyone that hasn't watched it, even better series of books. love this channel and love the work you all do.
Best sci-fi show I’ve seen in years, maybe ever!
Agreed is so good
@@ar1sm70 you mean this video? I would have to agree it's pretty well thought out sci-fi.
@@xplanenation2865 I was actually talking about The Expanse show in response to a comment.
I thought he was referencing Starship Troopers
Fascinating. As with all other Start Talk shows, I'd love to hear more on this subject. Thank you, Neil and all the great guests.
Sure am glad we have Dr. Tyson asking good questions for us.
I hope this is a joke.
I'm here for Chuck's questions
@aDBo'Ch 1 he needs to get on Lex friedmans show. Far more professional. This was utter nonsense. Can’t believe Neil is acting so foolish.
Nothing wrong with going on both? I personally fall asleep every time I try watching lex Friedman ‘s podcast
@@21972012145525 perhaps neil is catering to the wrong audience
Chuck, The Expanse! The best show representing our solar system!
Yes! If you don't have nukes, throwing big camouflaged asteroids is a cheap alternative.
Great speaker.
Thanks for explaining.
My only concern with DART is the space objects that we don’t see. There is a ton of objects in the solar system. The fact that our planet hasn’t had a facelift in a long time is amazing.
I was thinking the same, so much is going on the Interstellar space, I haven't forgotten the omuamua yet, we don't know how long for the Jupiter is going to protect us, we have plans for decades but don't know what the Nasa will reveal the very next morning, we are doomed....
They say they are successfully tracking everything bigger than city killers and there are none on collision course.
The facelift fact is an answer unto itself, we are not alone here..
Maybe this is the right time for the Chuck Nice Space Laser to be on standby, just in case someone forgot to carry the 1.
Following this event closely. Great video!!
I could literally listen to space talk until I die. I find it truly the most fascinating topic out there
Did Chuck make a reference to The Expanse?
16:30 The show is "The Expanse", really good to watch.
@ 5:32 Chuck asked the EXACT question I immediately had right there. Love you, Chuck lol.
Yes Chuck! Marco Inaros is the guy sending the asteroids towards the earth. Great series by the way.
Im curious if the smaller debri that also orbits the larger bodies is a worry for trajectory deflection.
39 min on the countdown and I'm here to warm up. let's go baby!
Seems Chuck is a fan of The Expanse. Referencing Marco Inaros' actions.
It's the 26th September about 2 hours before impact. I'm nervous but also have full trust in NASA's abilities
Just commenting for interaction.
Love your content! Never stop!
Hey man, I've never commented on anything before but I am compelled to applaud and thank you for your attempt to remind us of the utter imperativeness (not a word apparently, but should be) of embracing the scientific method again. I'm referring to your new book, which I haven't read but can tell instantly from your interview at MSNBC with the dude that's bad at math, that your intentions are to re-establish the sanctity of truth, because anything other than the truth only adds to the confusion. I share your reverence for truth. Something that should be so self evident isn't and we all need to hear it.
Keep looking up yall 🌎
These are getting better and better. I'm a fan.
Obviously, there is a whole Series on this topic. Great research material. I am talking about "Salvation".
Well, you know that they say: People that worry too much about Asteroids end up with Hemorrhoids.
Does time physically age?
Yes, but it depends on its mood
Space and time are the same so yes
I thought the past, present and future are all happening at the same “time,” so I guess the answer is all of the above. 🤷🏽♂️
That is the highest question I’ve ever heard 😂
Depends on what you mean by "time". Also depends on what you mean by "age". Also depends on what you mean by "physically".
Coincidentally, I'm watching Deep Impact (1998) now
Don't Look Up is an incredible movie. More in line with this.
Spoiler alert!
Impact wasn't deep.
Barely a scratch.
Now to work on deflecting solar flares. 😃
Solar flare
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_flare
This precision is mind boggling to me.
How can I ask a question?
My feeling is that we need not worry so much from asteroids destroying our planet but worry more about some of our crazy leaders of some countries of our planet.
We can walk and chew gum at the same time lol
Comets will still be a big problem right? Since we'll probably won't see that coming for a long time ahead + it's speed will be a lot higher?
"Im the Planetary Defense Officer" thats quite the conversation starter.
Love his moustache, brings some good memories.
I'm watching the NASA channel right now. A lot of interesting info!
I had written in the year 2002 to a certain place in the USA about changing the course of an approaching asteroid.
NDT should run for President!
He's too reasonable and intelligent to handle peoples political stupidity.
DART is really exciting…in super slow motion.
If NASA mounted a mission to deflect an asteroid headed for an impact with earth and didn't want to panic the public, what would the perfect cover story be?
Lol I see what you are saying
I'm very surprised that those two asteroids make an orbiting system. I didn't think something that small would be able to have a moonlet at all
Chuck absolutely slays me
Love Love Love Love 💕 I feel like I can't Thank you enough for taking the time informing us all with these exciting interesting topics!
man all i gotta say you and chuck gotta make a documentary word up
I was lucky enough to get an invite for myself and my father in-law to a viewing event on Mon night at the John Hopkins Applied Physics Lab for the DART impact. Very excited to hear some of the guest speakers and see the telemetry roll in before I head down to the Cape the next morning for my own launch exercise.
Enjoy!
Good luck!! Hope you have a great time!
I recall a rather large meteor that flew through Russia a few years ago that took everyone by surprise. Everyone was focused on DA14 asteroid. Is that because it wasn't large enough to be consider a real threat?
Yes. There are a lot of small asteroids that we can't keep track of so the priority is bigger targets that could actually cause major damage
Asteroids are a real unseen danger that eventually may come knocking
And such impacting sea would cause rains and tsunami. As it has happened in past several times. Surface of the moon is good examplee of amount there is rocks flying around. Moon receives every hit on its surface, and older hits will just and only disappear by hits coming after, covering older ones
The Earth is hit by about 6,000 meteors (large enough to reach the ground) and about 17,000 meteorites each year. It's inevitable that an asteroid hitting Earth WILL happen eventually.
@@nyc220guy so, moon is hit about 1/4 of that amount per day, and every bit hits the surface. Now build a base in there.. :) wonder how many hits ISS has received already, or satellites, which in turn, creates more debris that can hit other gear up there
How crazy is it that I was watching this video on the 26th of September at 7:14 eastern time🤣😂
I know but I was not.
Talent all across the board.
Chuck Nice watched "The Expance" :D
Marko Inaros was my favourite character
If we can collect debris along the way, then we can make the interaction more effective without lifting that mass from earth. Also, today most cameras use CMOS sensors instead of CCDs.. CCDs still have cleaner signals so most research instruments still use them; however, CMOS technology is improving and it is possible that this also will soon change.
I love this channel. Great videos and easy to understand, no need to be an expert. Love the comedy's finesse touch.
Marco Inaros sends his regards (what Chuck is worried about)
I think Marco was browsing through the old archive of videos and thought, 'Well, that is a nice idea, Chuck."
😅
I think we definitely have the ability to deflect an asteroid. Of course it depends on the astroid's path, its mass, timing, etc., but it will also take a significant international effort.
just need to shoot missiles at it. that attach side thruster's to gently persuade it of course , the further away the less degrees u need to nudge it
but everyone’s focused on each other sadly.
Finally a good use for all those missiles we got aimed at eachother kek
I love this show
If the Universe is expanding what would happen if it stopped and even started to contract? How would that effect the Earth and our Sun?
The expanse is the show chuck is referring to, amazing show btw
Amazing video thanks for another lesson !!
The MOST ACCURATE targeting practice EVER!
"Around the Earth, past the Moon, nothing but Didymos." 🙂
Have we explored all possibilities? Couldn't we just land a can of hair spray on an asteroid and have it go off once in awhile?
Properly if its early Enough
You trying to give the asteroid a beehive, maybe a B-52 or something?!😂
Asteroid is bald
because the inhabitants may not have hair.😁
@@cruelworld1902 .😁
I'd speculate that even if we were masters at asteroid deflection, we wouldn't be able to detect all of the big fast ones coming our way. Especially the ones moving thousands of miles an hour.
What about something like oumuamua coming towards us. Would we even notice it?
Well you guys should also incorporate some graphics and animations to make videos for intriguing.
Man, it's better if Tyson explains it him self.
Good thing they called it DART and not *FART* (first asteroid redirect test). Lol
Could you explain the aiming more? This seems harder than firing two guns a mile from each other and having the bullets collide. Aren’t those rocks coming way faster than an F22?
Neil and Chuck for 2024
So with our current observational capabilities, how long would we need to detect a previously unknown object coming through or from the Oort Cloud heading directly to earth? Could we miss it for a couple years after leaving the Oort Cloud towards us?
God Bless These Men :)
❤️
Can we break it down to sooo many pieces that it spreads, it's smaller and less deadlier
Interesting
No, the energy imparted is a function of mass and velocity and the mass wouldn't change if it were broken into small pieces. The destruction would look very different but the effect would be the same.
Due to my general lack of knowledge about these things, if we mildly change this situation’s orbit, could it possibly end up crashing into Mars around the time we get there?
That would be hilariously bad...
The simple answer is no. The main asteroid Dimorphos will be unchanged, Didymos will slow by a small percentage, like 2%, but remain stable.
Technically.. not unchanged.. orbital mechanics and gravity would play a part, so 'negligible' is more accurate
@aDBo'Ch 1 Thank you for the comment, it added a less than zero increase of an interesting chat.
@aDBo'Ch 1 No , I am no genius, i may have a talent for being able to have multiple concurrent thoughts, but this is a channel with NGT , Chuck and ...here Lindley.
I am a minnow in their waters, to the extent that I do not know what point you are making.
just wondering if deflect the asteroid, will the earth gravity pull it back and hit earth harder?
Can you get him back on to talk about the results?
Hi @Startalk! Recently we all know that DART mission was successful. Also Apophis recently passed Earth and returning in 7 years. Could DART mission be used on Apophis?
After observing the impact yesterday, my first thought was My first thought was "Hey, Dimorphos... This one's for the dinosaurs!"
Wow, it's like playing snooker in space, adjust to the power of shifting that stone by 1 inch 👍
It's a little hard to believe that we are just getting around to this, but extremely proud we have the right people on it.
We have no defense against asteroids without an orbit right?
Another excellent episode with an excellent panelist. One question I have is: was Neil drinking red wine before or during this 🙂
Nice looking!
- And good speeding up! 👍
ALL ages are just perfect... Rockets are good... But it is like bike. Not more complex.
As for gifts from highests - u got it.
😏👍🌍👍😉
This guy reminds me of the Office Space guy. "I talk to the customers!"
In the Expanse not only does the protagonist move the asteroid. He attaches stealth technology to is so we don’t notice the asteroid until it is way too late.
16:37 you're talking about The Expanse
You always hear the term just outside of our solar system meaning past the furthest planet in orbit but what about above and below our solar system?
🤔🌍📡
An Italian camera will record the impact in Space? Hopefully it doesn't switch sides and joins the Asteroids 🤣
If anyone is curious, 4 miles per second which is the speed that dart travelled at, calculates to 14,400 miles per hour. To convert miles per second to miles per hour, simply take the miles per second and multiply it by 3600. The reason is that there are 3600 seconds in one hour.
yes : all you gotta do is push it enough off coarse ,or off the trajectory towards the earth and size plays a factor as well ,but yes it's within our power to do
just need to shoot missiles at it. that attach side thruster's to gently persuade it of course , the further away the less degrees u need to nudge it
Push it off course with a stable and predictable trajectory as there is still a major factor to consider... Gravity. The Sun, the planets, etc.
I hope one day Neil becomes fascinated with Tea and starts a new podcast called Teatalk with Neil deGrasse Teason because Tea is everything! Tea 🍵
chuck and neil together is the best
what is the maximum weight that can be launch and reach a asteroid ;
did chuck just reference the Bobiverse in @16:27 ?
Will this be shown live on RUclips? Would love to see the footage! 💥
It is live
Point is that we want to know what it is made out of. If we like what we see…. Let space mining begin 👀
That looks like a Schroedinger's Catbox with wings...
Schrödinger's cat
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schrödinger's_cat
God, I love Chuck 😂
How did the meteor in 2013 go undetected?
I expect NASA will have a long road ahead turning this science into a real planetary defense. Given the project approval in June of 2017 and study on the pair of asteroids began in 2003. It is difficult to imagine this sort of mission as an emergency response to a newly discovered threat. One has to wonder at what distances must we detect these threats in order to mount a defense?
What if a black hole collides with a neutron star and sends gravitational waves strong enough to change our reality of space and time? Will we live in a slower world? Fascinating i love science
Unless it hits directly in line with the center of mass of the asteroid... the asteroid will just rotate about it's center of mass. With very little change in it's velocity.
So is the moon-let epididymos?
Plan for the worst, and actually do something constructive to alleviate the possibility. Can we use the same logic to remove the potential for Planetary Destruction here on Earth?