@@TheVideoGameReject In generell, ERSGAN is better on low bitrate / high compressed material while CUGAN outperformes it on high bitrate but low resolution material. But it really depens, this is why you run a 10s testclip through various of upscalers.
If your ESRGAN upscale looks this bad, you're clearly doing something wrong. ESRGAN beats the living crap out of Topaz. Maybe when you stitched the images back into a video you screwed up the encode, because this looks like it has a LOT of compression artifacts.
truly living up to the channel name
KEK
LMFAO
ESRGAN It is train only for anime
i compare anime soooo
@@UselessUpscales As a highly commercialized software, no doubt VEAI is better overall
@@yuwong5850 way better
Esr looks a good deal better but I dont like the hassle of having to combine pics into video wish they would change that
You should have use another video because there are to many scenes. It can not be compared. to much movement
Can you try real-cugan?
real-cugan is worse
@@TheVideoGameReject In generell, ERSGAN is better on low bitrate / high compressed material while CUGAN outperformes it on high bitrate but low resolution material.
But it really depens, this is why you run a 10s testclip through various of upscalers.
If your ESRGAN upscale looks this bad, you're clearly doing something wrong. ESRGAN beats the living crap out of Topaz. Maybe when you stitched the images back into a video you screwed up the encode, because this looks like it has a LOT of compression artifacts.
source was 144p
Dang its TechnoMasterBoy teach us Master of tech
@@UselessUpscales Doesn't matter. ESRGAN still beats the shit out of VEAI.
Where i said VEAI is better?
@@UselessUpscales Your video is showing VEAI giving better results.