@@Russh1 With Toyota's famous safety-cell? I doubt it! Did you just miss the fact that the cabin remained intact, and the crash-test dummy was not impacted by anything but the airbag...? I've got a little story for you, it's even true:- in the days before airbags, my mum, a professional driver ~ a truckie who could drive anything on wheels, once went over the side in the Snowy Mountains (in Victoria, on the back road from Orbost to Benalla), rolling side-over-side and end-over-end, and landing on a tree-stump 100m down (which was just as well because beyond the stump was nothing but air). She was clipped by another car and went over, on a spot where a lot of people had done the same -- but as at 1991, she was the only one ever to have survived it. She was in her Toyota Hilux. It broke the chassis, left the main shaft on about a 100 degree angle to itself, and not a panel was recognisable; the canopy disintegrated to nothing - not even a sliver remained of it - and not surprisingly the car was written-off ... but the safety-cell was completely intact, so she walked away from it without even chipping her manicure -- she quite literally pulled herself up the mountain and went for help on foot! Toyota later used her wreck in their first 'Unbreakable' ads. Some cars today can't even withstand a glorified 'fender-bender'; and virtually none would see the driver safely through that! A Hilux, before ABS, traction-control, driver-assist, or airbags, *did.* I certainly wouldn't recommend testing one _that_ way, but I saw the wreck ... and because of it, I won't drive anything but a Toyota ~ a Hilux or a LandCruiser (and I in fact own a LandCruiser).
@@Loribyn it seems to be alot of luck that your mum survived the toyota safety cell🤣 every car has a safety cell mercedes and volvo are the best this car is not up to scratch with modern safety ill take a gle350d over the Toyota in a head on even a new 2017 comodore woild fair better their a reliable good car but not the safest.
No, the description is correct, it is a V8 diesel. The previous model had a straight 6 cylinder diesel, which obviously still is the engine in many countries. This vehicle never had a V6 diesel.
to answer your question(if it is) bull bars in Australia are generaly not fitted to a vehicle with airbags unless the bull bar is airbag compatible. in a crash the bullbar can actually benifit as the energy goes through the chassis first rather the the whole front end taking it and if u have ever seen a 4x4 with a bullbar hit another car u would want a bullbar. and btw the australian standerd means that there built to hit shit at high speeds and keep going
Yep! Top security pick! :)) Also, if it looks like it has been designed in 80's, drives like a 80's car and is optioned like a 80's car, then it is a duck! :)
Having driven one of these and a Nissan patrol of similar vintage, really glad I never got into an accident in either. All the time I felt less safe jetting around in the Hilux after work. See the video for that one inyou haven't, didnt expect that outcome a all.
Does not an australian standards compliant bullbar need to a) not effect the deployment profile of the vehicles airbags b) maintain the vehicles crush profile? Australian standards compliant bullbars are designed to maintain the vehicles power train in the event of an animal strike. The energy they are able to manage is nothing compared to a collision.
+MrBrentles They are tested like all 4x4's. If you can drive it with a car licence, then it must be tested like other vehicles of the same weight, size, and driving licence class.
it performed excellently for what it is, especially compared to the more modern design Nissan Patrol (cab & tray) which folded up like a beer can. I'm glad to see toyota updated this series of Land Cruiser with airbags. If only Land Rover will do the same with the Defender and finally submit it for crash testing
Firstly we're talking diesel engines and secondly I dont know if Toyota have ever put a V6 diesel in a Landcruiser, Straight 6 yea but V6 i dont think so.
mate toyota in OZ stopped production of the V6 in november 2006. from then on its all V8 4.5L turbo diesel. there are no more straight 6's on landcruizer any more. now who's llooklike a wank.
now pour some diesel in it and turn the key: i bet it runs like a champ!.
Who are you talking to? The driver is dead.
Came to the comments just to read this. Thanks for that.
@@Russh1 With Toyota's famous safety-cell? I doubt it!
Did you just miss the fact that the cabin remained intact, and the crash-test dummy was not impacted by anything but the airbag...?
I've got a little story for you, it's even true:- in the days before airbags, my mum, a professional driver ~ a truckie who could drive anything on wheels, once went over the side in the Snowy Mountains (in Victoria, on the back road from Orbost to Benalla), rolling side-over-side and end-over-end, and landing on a tree-stump 100m down (which was just as well because beyond the stump was nothing but air). She was clipped by another car and went over, on a spot where a lot of people had done the same -- but as at 1991, she was the only one ever to have survived it. She was in her Toyota Hilux. It broke the chassis, left the main shaft on about a 100 degree angle to itself, and not a panel was recognisable; the canopy disintegrated to nothing - not even a sliver remained of it - and not surprisingly the car was written-off ... but the safety-cell was completely intact, so she walked away from it without even chipping her manicure -- she quite literally pulled herself up the mountain and went for help on foot! Toyota later used her wreck in their first 'Unbreakable' ads.
Some cars today can't even withstand a glorified 'fender-bender'; and virtually none would see the driver safely through that! A Hilux, before ABS, traction-control, driver-assist, or airbags, *did.*
I certainly wouldn't recommend testing one _that_ way, but I saw the wreck ... and because of it, I won't drive anything but a Toyota ~ a Hilux or a LandCruiser (and I in fact own a LandCruiser).
@@Loribyn it seems to be alot of luck that your mum survived the toyota safety cell🤣 every car has a safety cell mercedes and volvo are the best this car is not up to scratch with modern safety ill take a gle350d over the Toyota in a head on even a new 2017 comodore woild fair better their a reliable good car but not the safest.
cOmEDy cUz yA kNoW iTs A tOyOtA 🤠🤠
No, the description is correct, it is a V8 diesel. The previous model had a straight 6 cylinder diesel, which obviously still is the engine in many countries. This vehicle never had a V6 diesel.
Here in South Africa we always had a V6 and V8 option
@@thabo9218 toyota has never put a v6 diesel in a land cruiser
@@epicengines2565 i meant inline6
It does sometimes have a v6 petrol
to answer your question(if it is) bull bars in Australia are generaly not fitted to a vehicle with airbags unless the bull bar is airbag compatible. in a crash the bullbar can actually benifit as the energy goes through the chassis first rather the the whole front end taking it and if u have ever seen a 4x4 with a bullbar hit another car u would want a bullbar. and btw the australian standerd means that there built to hit shit at high speeds and keep going
I love the way that empty alloy tray deformed the cab. Imagine it had your tools and material on it.........
Wonder what it would look like with an Australian approved bull bar
wonder what it would look like with a new zealand approved bull bar
@@josephstalin2138 it would suck
فيديو سنة 2010
، 2016 ماخذ تقيم 5 نجوم للسلامة
What bothers me about safety organisations is that they blame the car or truck for being too dangerous.
well. what are we supposed to blame jason?
OUCH. But the US needs this anyway ASAP!!
For real
Yep! Top security pick! :)) Also, if it looks like it has been designed in 80's, drives like a 80's car and is optioned like a 80's car, then it is a duck! :)
It has been designed in the 80s.
Most of them come with bullbars and sidesteps and I've seen these crash at high speeds with them and it just shifts the bulbar
Oh what a feelin'
bet it still goes!
4 inch lift and 35" u would have ran that bump over worst case cd player might jump
Oh dear looks like every Ossie in for a rough time after that!
even windscreen not broken!!!! amazing thats my car
Having driven one of these and a Nissan patrol of similar vintage, really glad I never got into an accident in either.
All the time I felt less safe jetting around in the Hilux after work. See the video for that one inyou haven't, didnt expect that outcome a all.
imagine driving one of these tuned off its head and raised 6" thinking if you hit something you'll come off best lmao
@ChildsInc Problem with these 70 series beasts is they have no crumple zones. These are designed for off-road use, not high speed freeways.
Does not an australian standards compliant bullbar need to a) not effect the deployment profile of the vehicles airbags b) maintain the vehicles crush profile? Australian standards compliant bullbars are designed to maintain the vehicles power train in the event of an animal strike. The energy they are able to manage is nothing compared to a collision.
Were they testing out the rear tray or the truck?
Introducing the all new "short wheelbase" Toyota Landcruiser 70 Series.
Pop the clutch and keep it movin' its a Toyota..
It's a cruiser they can't be Beat
It's like watching a Stanley Kubrick film..
Its sad that these are being tested using car test ratings. They really are a light truck.
+MrBrentles They are tested like all 4x4's.
If you can drive it with a car licence, then it must be tested like other vehicles of the same weight, size, and driving licence class.
A 40 mph impact is a 40 mph impact, irrelevant if it is a car, light truck or a truck.
time to wrap mine around a pole 😂
Cruiser looked to be better than the patrol. I know which one I'd rather be in.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!! why god why????
Would a more accurate test include having some sort of cargo in the back as it would resemble in a real life scenario?
it performed excellently for what it is, especially compared to the more modern design Nissan Patrol (cab & tray) which folded up like a beer can.
I'm glad to see toyota updated this series of Land Cruiser with airbags. If only Land Rover will do the same with the Defender and finally submit it for crash testing
Unsafe? Don't care. Still want one.
Straight 6 and v6 are not the same. This model never came with such V6 engine.
i would said: its a Cruiser!
Firstly we're talking diesel engines and secondly I dont know if Toyota have ever put a V6 diesel in a Landcruiser, Straight 6 yea but V6 i dont think so.
land cruiser 4 ever !!!
They can buff that shit out...
For sure, shit like you!)
Poder Toyota!!!
Esa camioneta parece estar hecha de adamantium😂
WHY THE HELL would u ruin a perfectly good landcruiser!!
Yeah as it flys through the back window into the cabin lol
mate toyota in OZ stopped production of the V6 in november 2006. from then on its all V8 4.5L turbo diesel. there are no more straight 6's on landcruizer any more. now who's llooklike a wank.
fucking land rover!!!!!!!!
Worse because there would be no crumple zone.
thank you very much for that lesson
Coffins Cruiser 😂😂
Yep for sure you ain't walking away from that.
this truck is so ugly
Эрик Давидыч you aren’t exactly an oil painting yourself my bellicose friend.
Toyota cartoon crash test