The Best KJV Study Bibles
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
- My Official Website: kjvm.org
If you have been blessed by the teaching and preaching of this ministry, (and if the Lord leads you to) we would like you to prayerfully consider donating to King James Video Ministries. ALL of our videos are given FREELY to anyone who wants to watch them, but it costs us a lot of time and money to do this. My channel is NOT monetized on RUclips, and we rely solely on the body of Christ to support us, according to 1 Corinthians 9:7-11.
Our Donation page with a PayPal Link: kjvm.org/donat...
Give Send Go Link: www.givesendgo...
You can also send checks, money orders, or cash directly to our ministry.
Our ministry address is:
King James Video Ministries
P.O. Box 214
Patten, ME 04765
I no longer have an email account due to receiving thousands of emails every day. I can not write back to everyone. If you need to get in contact with me, please send a letter to the ministry address above. If you want to send something to Katherine or Oliver, PLEASE DO NOT PUT THEIR NAME ON THE ENVELOPE. Just send it to my name (Bryan Denlinger) or to the ministry name (King James Video Ministries). Thank you very much.
How to be saved:
A Salvation Message: • A Salvation Message
What Is TRUE Biblical Salvation?: • What Is TRUE Biblical ...
The 7 Parts Of Biblical Salvation: • The 7 Parts Of Biblica...
Here are the links to websites which sell these 6 different KJV study bibles:
www.thekjvstore...
kjv1611.org/ruc...
purewordsoftrut...
Hi Brother, thank you so much for the detailed video. As am from India and am the first person God has chosen me from my family, I was not sure of what Bible to read. Thank God, that He made me buy Hendrickson's KJV Bible - large print and I have started to study the Word.
Now that I wanted better understanding of the Word, I asked God to tell me of a good reference cum study Bible. Am so glad that God made me see this full video.
Yes, I will buy both Ruckman's reference study Bible and the comman man reference Bible.
Thank you so much. God Bless you, your family and your Ministry in all spheres of your life. Thank you once again!
Study Bibles have their use, but there comes a time when you just need to put them on the shelf, and go with a plain text. Just you and God spending time together in His Word. I recently came to that point in my life. I used Scofield for 20+ years. Bought a CMRB. Nice Bible. Wasn't really crazy about some of Hoffman's ideas. Nonetheless, decent study Bible, and did like the fact that he gave praise to the text. Just a few things I read, and just didn't think them necessary. God will judge according as He sees best. I now use a plain text wide margin from LCBP for reading, and church. I use a Note Takers, also from LCBP for preaching. I used to use the Classic Note Bible from Anchor for preaching. After asking many times for them to fix their printing errors in the text, and getting no reply, I no longer use, or endorse it.
The holy bible king James version kjv published in 1611 🦁🐯🐺🐻🐼🐨🦊🦝🐉🐊🐘🦙🦒🦍🦔🍞🍾👡👡🇦🇺🇧🇷🇨🇦🇪🇬🇬🇧🇫🇷🇩🇪🇮🇳🇮🇱🇮🇹🇮🇹🇲🇬🇲🇽🇲🇽🇷🇴🇹🇳🇺🇲🇻🇦🇻🇪
Saint king James the first James Stewart rest in peace amen 🦁🐯🐺🐻🐼🐨🦊🦝🐉🐊🐘🦙🦒🦍🦔🍞🍾👡👡🇦🇺🇧🇷🇨🇦🇪🇬🇬🇧🇫🇷🇩🇪🇮🇳🇮🇱🇮🇹🇯🇵🇲🇬🇲🇽🇷🇴🇹🇳🇺🇲🇻🇦🇻🇪
Rest in peace saint king James the first James Stewart amen 🦁🐯🐻🐻🐼🐨🦊🦝🐉🐊🐘🦙🦒🦍🦔🍞🍾👡👡🇦🇺🇧🇷🇨🇦🇪🇬🇬🇧🇫🇷🇩🇪🇮🇳🇮🇱🇮🇹🇯🇵🇲🇬🇲🇽🇷🇴🇹🇳🇺🇲🇻🇦🇻🇪
The Classic Note Bible doesn’t have any printing errors that I’m aware of. That was the Bible Jack Hyles recommended.
My favorite bible, believe or not JESUS allowed me to get , is a Holman kjv gaint print bible, it's a clean text it doesn't have really any man's opinion, it's just the text
The holy bible king James version kjv published in 1611 the best seller of all time 🦁🐯🐺🐻🐨🐼🦊🦝🐉🐊🐘🦒🦍🦔🍞🍾🧸👡👡🇦🇺🇧🇷🇨🇦🇪🇬🇬🇧🇫🇷🇩🇪🇮🇳🇮🇱🇮🇹🇯🇵🇲🇬🇲🇽🇷🇴🇹🇳🇺🇲🇻🇦🇻🇪
Saint king James the first James Stewart rest in peace amen 🦁🐯🐺🐻🐨🐼🦊🦝🐉🐊🐘🦒🦍🦔🍞🍾🧸👡👡🇦🇺🇧🇷🇨🇦🇪🇬🇬🇧🇫🇷🇩🇪🇮🇳🇮🇱🇮🇹🇯🇵🇲🇬🇲🇽🇷🇴🇹🇳🇺🇲🇻🇦🇻🇪
Rest in peace saint king James the first James Stewart amen 🦁🐯🐺🐻🐨🐼🦊🦝🐉🐊🐘🦒🦍🦔🍞🍾🧸👡👡🇦🇺🇧🇷🇨🇦🇪🇬🇬🇧🇫🇷🇩🇪🇮🇳🇮🇱🇮🇹🇯🇵🇲🇬🇲🇽🇷🇴🇹🇳🇺🇲🇻🇦🇻🇪
I would not recommend the Thompson Chain Reference bible to a new believer. Because they aren't mature and are uninformed, they'll be prone to believe the false commentaries and can be led astray. Westcott and Hort ESPECIALLY shouldn't have been included in there! Those men were involved in the occult and did not believe in the deity of Jesus. Unbelievers have no business translating the Bible or having any sort of input.
That Thompson Chain Reference Bible looks beautiful
+Ryan Taylor If you decide to purchase one I suggest you get the hardback. My bonded leather version fell apart after one year.
This is a great help in making decisions about what Bible to purchase. The time you spent in making this thorough video is a blessing. It was very helpful to list where we could purchase the Bibles. Thank you!
:) know what I respect about you? you have balance... you state the problems you see and the good you see also.. thats what I like... you're not just condemning and critisizing.. but you state what you see as a problem and the good about it... thank you
The Holman Rainbow study bible is one of the few that is also a Pure Cambridge Edition of the KJV.
This is how I think he would rate the study Bibles
1.Common Man's Reference Bible
2.Ruckman Reference Bible
3.Thompson Chain Reference Bible
4.Rainbow Study Bible
5.Scofield Study Bible
6.The Defender's Study Bible
Do you own all these bible? Do you find all the knowledge over whelming?
MVP 🤗
I bought a common man's reference bible from the KJV store and it STUNK. Literally, the worst TOXIC odor I had ever smelled in my LIFE.
I have a scofield kjv study bible I love it, it reminds me of a Thompson chain reference
The holy bible king James version kjv published in 1611🦁🐯🐺🐻🐨🐼🦊🦝🐉🐊🐘🦒🦍🦔🍞🍾🧸👡👡🇦🇺🇧🇷🇨🇦🇪🇬🇬🇧🇫🇷🇩🇪🇮🇱🇮🇳🇮🇹🇯🇵🇲🇬🇲🇽🇷🇴🇹🇳🇺🇲🇻🇦🇻🇪
Saint king James the first James Stewart rest in peace amen 🦁🐯🐺🐻🐨🐼🦊🦝🐉🐊🐘🦒🦍🦔🍞🍾🧸👡👡🇦🇺🇧🇷🇨🇦🇪🇬🇬🇧🇫🇷🇩🇪🇮🇱🇮🇳🇮🇹🇯🇵🇲🇬🇲🇽🇷🇴🇹🇳🇺🇲🇻🇦🇻🇪
Rest in peace saint king James the first James Stewart amen 🦁🐯🐺🐻🐨🐼🦊🦝🐉🐊🐘🦒🦍🦔🍞🍾🧸👡👡🇦🇺🇧🇷🇨🇦🇪🇬🇬🇧🇫🇷🇩🇪🇮🇱🇮🇳🇮🇹🇯🇵🇲🇬🇲🇽🇷🇴🇹🇳🇺🇲🇻🇦🇻🇪
My Local Church Publisher's Bible has NO commentary or notes on any of the pages. Just Scripture!
They do have Bibles with references in them and Concordance depends on which one you ordered me myself I prefer to go from verse the verse and stay within the Bible and take it for how I read it not by what other men perceive it to be
Yea but what if you hit a verse you don't understand?
@Amanda Williamson very good choice. I recently went with a plain text from LCBP. It's good to have a Bible without distractions, or human input
I like how a study bible explains things at the bottom with referances any good study bible like tha would your ecommened
And your review regarding the Slight Flaw in their color coding sytem due to some passages having more than one implication... is a Big Flaw... that is one of the main reasons I cited in a different video.. for NOT purchasing the Rainbow study bible.. as some passages cannot be catorgorized as this or that... that is why as far as one color coding their own bible DO NOT fall into the pattern of coding like passages in such a manner... One who is coloring or hi-lighting their bible would do better if they stuck to just hi-lighting passages that mean something to them personally.. otherwise.. one wil end up with a bible that ends up being just a confusing MESS..... And your Rainbow bible can be easily fixed.. just apply some super glue to the spine and hold for a minute or so.... good as new!...I've done this to several hardcovers and paperbacks...
The best seller of all time the holy bible king James version kjv published in 1611 love reverend doctor johnny Kennedy with Mrs Sarah Kennedy my beautiful wife 🇻🇪🇻🇦🇺🇲🇹🇳🇷🇴🇷🇴🇲🇬🇯🇵🇮🇹🇮🇱🇮🇳🇩🇪🇫🇷🇬🇧🇪🇬🇨🇦🇧🇷🇦🇺👡👡🎃🧸🍾🍞🦍🦒🐘🐊🐉🦝🦊🐨🐼🐻🐺🐯🦁
The best seller of all time the holy bible king James version kjv published in 1611🇻🇪🇻🇦🇺🇲🇹🇳🇷🇴🇲🇽🇲🇬🇯🇵🇮🇹🇮🇱🇮🇳🇩🇪🇫🇷🇬🇧🇪🇬🇨🇦🇧🇷🇦🇺👡👡🎃🧸🍾🍞🦍🦒🐘🐊🐉🦝🦊🐨🐼🐻🐺🐯🦁
The best seller of all time the holy bible king James version kjv published in 1611🇻🇪🇻🇦🇺🇲🇹🇳🇷🇴🇲🇽🇲🇬🇯🇵🇮🇹🇮🇱🇮🇳🇩🇪🇫🇷🇬🇧🇪🇬🇨🇦🇧🇷🇦🇺👡👡🎃🧸🍾🍞🦍🦒🐘🐊🐉🦝🦊🐨🐼🐻🐺🐯🦁
Jesus says, Read KJV Bible because it is anointed. Meaning other bible gives you your understanding of the word of god but you need the understanding of his. KJV bible is anointed. Get it?
Proverbs 3:5-6(KJV) Trust in the Lord with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding.
I was told this in person. Glory to GOD.
Thanks for the video. I have the "Common Man's Reference Bible" and the "Ruckman Reference Bible". LOVE THEM BOTH.... My favorite is the Ruckman Bible. I read the Common man's first and I'm glad I did because the notes are more basic and they get you ready for the Ruckman notes. The Ruckman notes are so deep and have so much detail, the man is truly amazing!
Do you still have the common man’s reference Bible?
The Thompson Chain is an excellent Bible. Not just for the "beginning" Christian. The linking of key words is very helpful for anyone. The First Day was one day, not a 1000 years, like some people believe. That's the point, it was only one day. I've been studying the Holy Bible for over 50 years and I still use my Thompson Chain.
Always so much fun to watch these King James Debates! I have been enjoying them for a half century. Sadly, apparently the assumption is that none of us in America, speaking more than one language; I speak Four, including Latin. Or are some so vain and so diluted that they think that a true scriptural ation from ancient texts is only available in our faulty English Language? My only hope is that in the end run, regardless of the prejudices and biases of this cult, that our Lord shows grace and mercy to those who don’t know any better what an enjoyable little video!
Many thanks for your video, it's obvious you put a lot of time and effort into giving a considered and thoughtful view. Thanks.
Thompson Chain vs KJV Sword study Bible......What do you think?
Do you think BB Bookstore will come out with a red letter edition of the Ruckman reference bible?
No way Jose I don't think so the best seller book of all time the holy bible king James version kjv published in 1611🇻🇪🇻🇦🇺🇲🇸🇲🇷🇴🇯🇵🇮🇹🇮🇳🇮🇱🇩🇪🇬🇧🇪🇬🇨🇦🇧🇷🇦🇺👡👡💄💍👜🧸💵💸📺📱🚔🎸❤️🍞🍾🦒🦍🐊🐘🐺🦁
The holy bible king James version kjv published in 1611🇻🇪🇻🇦🇺🇲🇸🇲🇷🇴🇯🇵🇮🇹🇮🇳🇮🇱🇩🇪🇬🇧🇪🇬🇨🇦🇧🇷🇦🇺👡👡💄💍👜🧸💵💸💰📺📱🚔🎸❤️🍞🍾🦒🦍🐊🐘🐺🦁
The best seller book of all time the holy bible king James version kjv published in 1611🇻🇪🇻🇦🇺🇲🇸🇲🇷🇴🇯🇵🇮🇹🇮🇳🇮🇱🇩🇪🇬🇧🇪🇬🇨🇦🇧🇷🇦🇺👡👡💄💍👜🧸💵💸💰📺📱🚔🎸❤️🍞🍾🦒🦍🐊🐘🐺🦁
yeah, the defenders study bible , added all those inaccurate notes . Reminds me of the New Scofield study bible. The Old Scofield was fine. The devils hard at work, wants to add that confusion , and those misinterpretation's.
The best seller of all time the holy bible king James version kjv published in 1611 🇻🇪🇻🇦🇺🇲🇹🇳🇷🇴🇲🇽🇲🇬🇯🇵🇮🇹🇮🇱🇮🇳🇩🇪🇫🇷🇬🇧🇪🇬🇨🇦🇧🇷🇦🇺👡👡🧸🎃🍾🍞🦍🦒🐘🐊🐉🦊🦝🐼🐻🐨🐺🐯🦁
Saint king James the first James Stewart rest in peace amen 🇻🇪🇻🇦🇺🇲🇹🇳🇷🇴🇲🇽🇲🇬🇯🇵🇮🇹🇮🇱🇮🇳🇩🇪🇫🇷🇬🇧🇪🇬🇨🇦🇧🇷🇦🇺👡👡🧸🎃🍾🦍🦒🐘🐊🐉🦊🦝🐼🐻🐨🐺🐯🦁
Rest in peace saint king James the first James Stewart amen 🇻🇪🇻🇦🇺🇲🇹🇳🇷🇴🇲🇽🇲🇬🇯🇵🇮🇹🇮🇱🇮🇳🇩🇪🇫🇷🇬🇧🇨🇦🇧🇷🇦🇺👡👡🧸🎃🍾🍞🦍🦒🐘🐊🐉🦊🦝🐼🐻🐨🐺🐯🦁
Thank you Micheal, i have been researching, i watched a documentary of the KJV, and i know in my heart the KJ version is for me.
Thank you for setting me on a true Bible path.
I have the Matthew Henry KJV study bible. I love it!
I have the common man's lamb skin. Seriously so soft you could use as a pillow and I have lol.
Henry Morris is excellent on much of his creation teachings
On the Scofield Bible - The scofield "O" foot note on 1 John 5: 7 the trinity verse says there is no authority for this verse as in westcott and hort.
Do we really want a study Bible that casts doubts on 1 John 5:7...????
Ruckman does a good job on the KJV.
Ruckman Reference Bible is pricey indeed, which is why I got the hard bound copy of the latest edition. I might go back later and order a leather cover or maybe when this one wears out I'll just get another hardcover. Also the Rainbow Study Bible, paper back is so flimsy. I had one tear up too.
The best seller of all time the holy bible king James version kjv published in 1611 🇻🇪🇻🇦🇺🇲🇹🇳🇷🇴🇲🇽🇲🇬🇯🇵🇮🇹🇮🇱🇮🇳🇩🇪🇫🇷🇬🇧🇪🇬🇨🇦🇧🇷🇦🇺👡👡🎃🧸🍾🍞🦍🦒🐘🐊🐉🦊🦝🐨🐼🐻🐺🐯🦁
The best seller of all time the holy bible king James version kjv published in 1611 🇻🇪🇻🇦🇺🇲🇹🇳🇷🇴🇲🇽🇲🇬🇯🇵🇮🇹🇮🇱🇮🇳🇩🇪🇫🇷🇬🇧🇪🇬🇨🇦🇧🇷🇦🇺👡👡🎃🧸🍾🍞🦍🦒🐘🐊🐉🦊🦝🐨🐼🐻🐺🐯🦁
The best seller of all time the holy bible king James version kjv published in 1611 🇻🇪🇻🇦🇺🇲🇹🇳🇷🇴🇲🇽🇲🇬🇯🇵🇮🇹🇮🇱🇮🇳🇩🇪🇫🇷🇬🇧🇪🇬🇨🇦🇧🇷🇦🇺👡👡🎃🧸🍾🍞🦍🦒🐘🐊🐉🦊🦝🐨🐼🐻🐺🐯🦁
The best seller of all time the holy bible king James version kjv published in 1611 🇻🇪🇻🇦🇺🇲🇹🇳🇷🇴🇲🇽🇲🇬🇯🇵🇮🇹🇮🇱🇮🇳🇩🇪🇫🇷🇬🇧🇪🇬🇨🇦🇧🇷🇦🇺👡👡🎃🧸🍾🍞🦍🦒🐘🐊🐉🦊🦝🐨🐼🐻🐺🐯🦁
Saint king James the first James Stewart rest in peace amen 🇻🇪🇻🇦🇺🇲🇹🇳🇷🇴🇲🇽🇲🇬🇯🇵🇮🇹🇮🇱🇮🇳🇩🇪🇫🇷🇬🇧🇪🇬🇨🇦🇧🇷🇦🇺👡👡🎃🧸🍾🦍🦒🐘🐊🐉🦊🦝🐨🐼🐻🐺🐯🦁
I love my ruckman reference Bible
Ruckman has alot of good sermons, except his explanation on Zechariah 5:2 about the roll. Dimension in that vers 20 by 10 cubits are the same as in 1 Kings 6 vers 3 'porch of the temple build by Solomon. Not a flying saucer that was a wrong interpretation.
The defender bible has so much commentary especially in Genesis so that people defending the creation have a full understanding and are adequately equiped to debate athiest or other non believers.
I am new to the Bible, your vids have been invaluable..Thank you.
you did not mention the Finnis Dakes study Bible, what about that one?
It's a pentacostal bible so it's worth having just to realise how the pentacostals get their wrong theology
Dakes is good study Bible, he also breaks down prophecy in Daniel and Revelations pretty good
The holy bible king James version kjv and new king James version NKJV published in 1611 and 1982 from Mr and Mrs johnny Kennedy from Peru Indiana Miami county USA 🇫🇷🇷🇺🇻🇪🇺🇬🇹🇳🇹🇿🇸🇸🇰🇪🇲🇬🇷🇴🇲🇽🇵🇹🇪🇸🇭🇺🇪🇬🇸🇾🇧🇷🇮🇳🇯🇵🇱🇧🇮🇱🇩🇪🇦🇺🇨🇦🇲🇹🇸🇲🇻🇦🇮🇹🇺🇲🇬🇧🐺🐊🐘🦒🦍🦁
The holy bible king James version kjv published in 1611 from Mr and Mrs.johnny Kennedy from Peru Indiana Miami county USA.🇫🇷🇮🇪🇷🇺🇻🇪🇺🇬🇸🇸🇰🇪🇲🇬🇹🇳🇹🇿🇷🇴🇲🇽🇵🇹🇪🇸🇭🇺🇪🇬🇸🇾🇱🇧🇧🇷🇮🇳🇯🇵🇮🇱🇩🇪🇦🇺🇨🇦🇸🇲🇻🇦🇮🇹🇺🇲🇬🇧🐺🐊🐘🦒🦍🦁
I am modifying my Holman NKJV Study Bible to correctly identify the major differences with the Holman KJV Bible. This will be a unique work and none of the Onlyist can complain that I am using a corrupt version or modern Bible version.
Hi. Scofield 'corrects' the text of the King James in Isaiah. He actually says "the text should read . . . " I am surprised that LCBP publishes Scofield with such enthusiasm
Does a similar move for 1 John 5:7
@@robertobriant3621 He does that, because the oldest copies of manuscripts do not have that verse at all. It was inserted in the King James Bible later. Give it some research. This isn’t the only scripture added to the King James Bible, there are several others. The research is very thorough, and well documented.
That is why many tend to read newer translations like NET or NIV. They are new translations from the oldest manuscripts we have, without the all the additions of people later.
Thanks for these very important illustrations and explanations to us. God bless this channel
Very interesting is Ruckmans rebuke on the slandering of Scofield..it cannot be susbstantiated. He had a sermon on that called....backsliders.
Thanks Brother Bryan.. Very interesting.
1 - I found this channel searching for a study Bible. I subbed because it will take me a very long time to get through your content. I thank, and curse you for that. Kidding aside, I respect your opinion because you were very thorough with your review.
2 - I want a Bible that will be the closest to the original meaning. I like reading the KJV, and that is as far as I can get so far. Due to your review I will look at "The Common Man's Bible." Due to a comment from a couple of days ago, I'm looking into "The Key Word Hebrew and Greek Strong's KJV." I would like your thoughts on that one as well. What I could find on that one so far was it seemed to take original words and reference them to modern language.
3 - This choice gets to be difficult when getting to words that are no longer a part of the vernacular, but I love the poetic sense of the KJV, and it just feels right. When trying to figure out the meanings of some stories, I get lost, and it may be just one word, or it might even be trying to comprehend it in it's entirety. I understand a lot of the history behind certain stories, and how the meaning of the story can be changed because we don't live as we lived then. I wouldn't say I know the Bible well, but I know some of the stories that are more commonly told. The movie "Jesus of Nazereth" was what pulled me into wanting to learn more. For me, Robert Powell was Jesus Christ, and that might even be the reason I like the KJV above all else.
4 - I appreciate any extra insight you might be able to give me. God bless.
Greg, have you considered getting Gail Riplingers text In Awe of His Word. Have recommends one not spend on expensive Greek and Hebrew, especially since many of those have altered the definitions in the back English section in an attempt to deceive. They started by redefine meaning of words to other then what the original Greek and Hebrew Text would say, prior to starting to change Scripture itself. She recommends getting an old Webster dictionary, such as one from the 1800's or purchase the oxford dictionary (or use it online as this is a 20 volume book). She explains in the book In Awe of his word, the built in Bible Dictionary included in the KJV and with these tools, you will be much more prepared for study.
THANK YOU, SO SO MUCH for taking the time to give this thorough review! It helped me greatly in choosing a good KJV study Bible👏👏👏👏👏📖✝️
I find it strange that in revelations Ch6 in the Thompson chain is Titled The first Seal FALSE CHRIST but you overlooked the title and say that the chain reference for the white hourse is talking about Jesus.The reference is showing a p.p Parallels of like scripture.The Anti christ a false Christ.I believe that when you fallow your own passions like kjv onlyism you overlook things to prove your own beliefs.Just like many Pentecostals overlook first Corinthians ch12.I have been in booth camps so I speak from my heart brother.Open your spiritual eyes see for yourself come out of these religious teachings.You say its dangerous when man adds helps to the bibles you dont approve of yet its ok for man to add helps to bibles that you agree to.I love you brother but I disagree with some of your teachings not all just some.You are my brother in Christ saved by His blood kept by His grace.Godbless
Anyone out there have an opinion of the Sword Study Bible? I understand it has God's words in red in the Old Testament as well as Jesus's words in the New Testament. Thanks.
Jack Hawes I really like my copy. I have the large print. There is a lot of interesting articles in the back, and as I recall very reasonably priced. I would recommend purchasing one.
Patricia Martinelli thx, Patricia.
Mathew 25 is a parable! "The bridegroom " represents God. This term was used many times in the NT to represent God. The many virgins represents the many believers who will find that they are not fully prepared for the return of Jesus when it does occur.
I'm sorry, I usually agree with your statements. However, I must disagree with you reference to his statements deceiving the interdiction to the new testament. if you would have continued reading (as I did), you will see that he defended his statements as to the authenticity of the original transcripts quite reasonably.
I do agree however, that there are many errors,, but on the other hand, anytime after person becomes involved in the interpretation of God's word, there is always going to be differences based on those interpretations.
Would you add the KJV Reformation Heritage Study Bible to your list of "one of the best" now?
So which KJV is the correct one? Which of those you reviewed were the pure Cambridge and which were the Oxford? And what is the oldest known copy/fragment of the Masoretic text?
can u do a "how to do Bible study" video
I have the hardback and the lambskin wide margin in the Ruckman reference. And I just ordered a common man very excited to get it in the mail 📖👍
Thanks for this. As for Dr. Morris` A.V./K.J.V. study Bible, it is superb for use in questions that come from pseudo-science ("scientism"), e.g. the false paradigm of evolution. That is all to use it for. As for repairing paperbacks like the Rainbow Bible, put some white glue on the exposed binding edge, then medecin cabinet gauze on the fresh glue, then a little more white glue on the other side of the gauze. Affix cover back on the edge & apply pressure. When glue dries, trim the gauze.
A KJV with no additional information is best, use a good concordance and the knowledge of those who have sound doctrine, let the word explain the word, anything more is from the wicked one.
amen to that!
Also pray earnestly to God that he will show you as much as he wants you to understand at that time. God has placed seals on his word.
perhaps I should be plain, the bibles of this world, the new age bibles are from a wicked source, the KJV is a translation, not a paraphrase, which belongs to new age bibles. it is the duty of kings to search out a matter, the KJV was made by enlightened translators, the best of the time and from the best scrolls. the whole world lies in the power of the wicked one, therefore we must seek the word. seek the 160th church in the land of 139 churches. extra biblical text are ok, but not necessary.
ESV is the best direct translation.
No, I believe the ESV is the best literal translation. NLT translation has too much "inclusive language". I don't want the translator's interpretation I want the literal word for word translation whenever possible.
What about the Sword Bible, with red letter in the Old AND New Testaments. Have you seen those since posting this video?
I like the sword Bible too, because it references which name or attribute of God, this passage is referring to, but I am think Gail Riplinger criticizes it in her book, and I haven't taken the time just to go through the Bible and look at the counterfeit list, but I am told by others, there are alterations. She also doesn't like the end of the verse definitions that sometimes show up as they can also be misleading as apparently we can not trust the alternate definitions they are filling in there. If you can ignore that and correct errors, there are benefits, but I don't like having a corrupt text in my hand. Much better to utilize the built in Bible dictionary.
Have you ever used a KJV Sword Bible with the red letter OT and NT???...I like it a lot, it defines words in each verse as needed...really good.
shawn stephens I have this same Bible and I really like it.
shawn stephens I'm using the same KJV Sword Study Bible too!!! although one thing Really DO NOT like at all is they change some words like [Twist, Shew and some others.] but other than that it's a great Bible with red letters in the OT. But at the end of the day, the Holy Bible AV is better without notes by anybody, just the scripture alone. I do wish there is a Holy Bible AV with red letters in Old Testament too, or just have it with color codings of the text with different colors similar like the rainbow.
Thats hows people became christians in acts...repent...believe...baptism...recieve the Holy Spirit. Now a days people respond to an alter call at a worldly church say a 30 second prayer and go home to their idols and call themselves saved...acts 2:38 is more of a biblically account of how to become a real christian than what we have today thats for sure.
In acts 10 peter says the same thing to gentiles with the same process
Whats that all about?? "A study bible by lost people?" Um yes I see your point (Salvation). but don't try to make assumption that were are "lost" because its a "Study Bible" or because we don't have the AV. You better be careful what you say because God records everything what you say and you're going to have to give an account when that day comes.
Also far more Christians have had their faith in the Book expounded and enriched by "Bible Schools".
As Christ told us in John 5:39 "search the scriptures" & Paul referring to the Berean’s [from verse 12]
Acts 17:11 “These were more noble than those in Thessalonica in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures DAILY, whether those things were so."
Thank you for this Video... I have always been a BIG KJV Bible fan... But never knew which one to go with for study/reference guide. I personally Like the Thompson Chain one for the simple fact of "Verse supports Verse" method. Not a big fan of personal "Opinion" type bibles.
You may take issue with certain textual criticisms but to refer to them as a cult is a grave error, just as legalism
I think that C.I. Scofield was a great man, in regaining the dispensational view points on the KJV Bible.
***** He was a man like any other man. There isn't any intrinsic good in man. We are sinners,saved by the grace of God. If it were not for the Lord's saving grace,we would all be going to hell,and I never make any mistakes about that. His wife was a sinner to you know,but the main important thing is that,in this murky mess of fallen humanity,some one like CI Scofield was able to produces such great commentaries for the modern thinkers of our generation,is note worthy,but as for his personal life,the demons that plagues us is the affliction of us all. For the good evil of the good,and the bad evil of the bad. The man was brilliant.
***** I'm not particularly defending Mr. CI Scofield,but what I'm trying to get you to see is that all have sinned and come short of the glory of God. If you never murdered,cheated on your wife,go to church every sunday in your suite and tie, pay your tithes faithfully...ect, It would be easy to compare one's self to those who fall short of your expectations,but how do your life compare to Jesus Christ,who was without sin? Christ is the measure by which we should compare ourselves to, in order to put things in proper perspective. It is by God grace that God gave his son to die for our continued sinfulness in this miserable
flesh,but we are not in the flesh,but justified in the spirit by faith alone in Jesus Christ.
***** You are looking at the wrong kind of fruit my friend. Because we live in a fallen depraved world,human beings have the gall to look on the outside,while God look's at the heart,seeing whether or not a person is trusting in his Son. The fruit that we ought to be looking at is whether on not,that person is proclaiming the good news of Jesus Christ or another gospel of,2 Cor.11:4-6; Gal.1:6-9;Matt.7:15-20,you will know them by what they profess out of their hearts/mouths you will know them. The good news is sins forgiven,life eternal,on God's behalf,sending his Son to ultimately die for sinners,while the obligation of the sinner is to trust totally in Christ atoning death. This is salvation,this is the fruit that we ought to be observing coming from a man that profess Christ,and CI Scofield fits the pattern of a born again believer in Christ Jesus our Lord,this is the kind of fruit I believe pleases God,not the condemnation of the devil. any one of us can bring down the condemnation of the devil,if we chews to operate in out fleshly natures,but it doesn't bring grace to the hearer,and you fill perfectly justified in doing so,but it doesn't bring glory to God,but honor to the devil,and what's even worst,you being a sinner is judging another man's true servant, God's. So what does that make you? a bona fide,100%,nothing added hypocrite,with all due respect.
***** Don't yawn,pay attention. I never said that I was good,but I will proclaim that I have been justified by grace,through faith in the finished work of Jesus Christ,1 Cor.15:1-4. And you to could have this eternal life if you would but only trust in the finished work of Christ, and that alone for salvation.
I used Scofield for 20+ years. Crossed out all of the critical notes. I still break out my wide margin Scofield for times of study.
Does the Ruckman reference bible in leather have Lined pages at the back?
This is why I got my Ruckman to compliment my Thompson. Love my Thompson.
I did the same thing.
Can you say something on Dake's Annotated Reference Bible, plaese?
What do you think of the Hebrew Bible which comes with God names and is supposed to be the word of God?
I think it'd be helpful if you would put the timestamps in the video at which each review starts.
7:22 Aren't you pointing to the wrong Antioch? I thought the KJV traced its manuscripts back to Syrian Antioch, not Pisidian Antioch?
If no translation is inspired then wouldn't that be saying that God isn't Sovereign enough to keep his word? I am 15, have done a lot of study, and I got my self a 1611 without the apocrypha...best bible I ever bought.
I really would like to know your assessment of the King James Int'l.Bible and the free study materials created by Tomorrows World & Living Church of God founded by Roderick C. Merridith before"I pick out the bones" please & get "rebaptized in Jesus name only. Have been a faithful believer since 1972 & baptized same year @ age 32.
Why there are 2nd edition or 3rd edition in the study bible. Is the 1st edition not good enough?
Easter and Passover is in no means the same thing. Easter was established not long after Nimrod. It has nothing to do with the Messiah. Nor has anything to do with the judgement on egypt or the children of Israel.
I like to look at Noah Webster's 1828 "American Dictionary of the English Language"
"Charity" has 8 definitions, but the first one is interesting here.
"1. In a general sense, love, benevolence, good will; that disposition of heart which inclines men to think favorably of their fellow men, and to do them good. In a theological sense, it includes supreme love to God, and universal good will to men."
Looks like the Septuagint was written around 100 or so BCE, and not 200, although some scholars pointed out that it was done between 200-300 BCE.
The text had to be written before Jesus, because there are some areas that either Paul used the Septuagint, or he translated the Hebrew into Greek when he wrote the epistles.
what about the DAKE kjv bible??
Also, bottom line. Do you think The Scofield bible is a good one?
Hope you don't mind my input, brother. It's good if you are grounded in your doctrine before reading the footnotes
Pastor Hoffman just released the Fifth Edition of the Commons Man's Reference Bible. Would you like one, Bro. Denlinger?
I have the 5th edition, and love it.
Thanks, husky394 for this presentation. You mention the errors that these books have in interpretation. What I have noticed in these study Bibles are the errors they have in the interpretation of the prophetic books. I have one Catholic version which misinterprets content in Daniel and the Book of Revelation, claiming that the beast is Rome and the empire emperor Nero. It's just ridiculous. The Oxford Study Bible also gives the same interpretation.
You should check out the KJV Rock Of Ages study Bible.
Having a Thompson Chain Ref Bible myself, I thought the Christ Victor note was kind of strange also. But as looked over, studied on it for a min or two, I believe it is simply trying to bring your attention to the issue of the false victor and the true one, which is Christ. The forward Ref for Points us to 17;14 so we can see the main thought of it. I think anyways. But- I do believe that it’s certainly worded wrong here no doubt. God Bless
Can you please do a small video on Bible commentaries you would recommend that are KJV only and are positively angled toward its text. I want to start seriously studying and finding more information for myself. I also would like to thank you so much for you efforts in bringing the truth to people, all of the versions and false teachings muddy things up and make one very unsure on whether you are reading or listening to the truth.
your review of the notes in the back of the Rainbow Study Bible were on point however... so... if you view the notes as ridiculous... I would think that you would view the whole bible and the concept of the Rainbow as ridiculous as well as one is indicative of the other in my opinion...
The holy bible king James version kjv published in 1611🇻🇪🇻🇦🇺🇲🇹🇳🇷🇴🇲🇽🇲🇬🇯🇵🇮🇹🇮🇱🇮🇳🇩🇪🇫🇷🇬🇧🇪🇬🇨🇦🇧🇷🇦🇺👡👡🧸🎃🍾🍞🦍🦒🐘🐊🐉🦝🦊🐨🐼🐻🐺🐯🦁
The holy bible king James version kjv 🇻🇪🇻🇦🇺🇲🇹🇳🇷🇴🇲🇽🇲🇬🇯🇵🇮🇹🇮🇱🇮🇳🇫🇷🇬🇧🇪🇬🇨🇦🇧🇷🇦🇺👡👡🧸🎃🍾🍞🦍🦒🐘🐊🐉🦝🦊🐨🐼🐻🐺🐯🦁
The holy bible king James version kjv 🇻🇪🇻🇦🇺🇲🇹🇳🇷🇴🇲🇽🇲🇬🇯🇵🇮🇹🇮🇱🇮🇳🇫🇷🇬🇧🇪🇬🇨🇦🇧🇷🇦🇺👡👡🧸🎃🍾🍞🦍🦒🐘🐊🐉🦝🦊🐨🐼🐻🐺🐯🦁
How about the KJV life application bible? is it a 1611 KJV?
Hallo Bryan I am a Bible believer and I use the Thompson Chain Reference KJV Bible Red Letter Edition and Thumb Index I have been a Bible Believer since 1984 and I have a question for you (How come is there so many KJV bible believers out there are following and believing in the flat earth theory?)
Brian I have the rainbow study bible. Isaiah 59v17 says cloak, Gen 30v37 says chestnut
I wonder what's your opinion on this on the dakes of Bible
Where may I find Ruckman's interview about Scofield? I'm glad to see that not everyone believes the critics. I've heard the arguments about Scofield in the past, but payed them no mind. I'd like to hear the full reply on this matter.
what about the Matthew Henry Study Bible?
It's a shame that KJV bible publishers don't include all the marginal notes from the original translators. They made notes just like "modern" English bible versions do. That is a fact.
I just watched the entirety of this video. I looked further into several of the bibles you recommended, and just purchased the Scofield bible from the kjv store. I currently have the Bullinger's Companion Bible, but that is hard to work with, because the side notes are very small, and all the notes are in the back. Each notation is a long and cryptic and here is an example: 11 Lord. Ap. 98. VI, B. 1. B.a. and you have to figure out where this is in the long list of (almost 200) appendices in the back. The notes are so tiny I can hardly read them. Also , the text has superscript letters, but no references to go with them. (?!) So in the meantime, I'm just reading the actual text and not using the notes or other resources. I get my new bible in 2 business days!!
I like a study bible tha has notes at the bottom with referances which one would you recommended ty an god bless
what do you think about the KJV AND NKJV Hebrew Greek Key world study bible by AMG publishers. im referring to the notes and especially his notes on Baptism. what is your reveiw or responce for this bible?
Thanks Husky394, I ended up buying the TCRB. I wanted to say something about the video. I wanted to point out the R.V. and p.p. are comparable, in that, they are added things or revisions. So in revelation 6:2, the p.p. was wrong, or the parallel passage...the p.p. has been added to the TCRB as a chain link since the original was created. So I watch out for R.V, and p.p. marks. Thanks again, God bless.
From Rainbow Bible: Easter in Acts was referring to an actual even that was a pagan holiday, not the celebration of the Resurrection. People have said that the KJB has an error because of this but it is actually more accurate that anyone realized. See Chuck Missler for more on this.
common mans bible is also flat earth supported
Henry Morris actually did write a book on Genesis...TWO as a matter of fact. The Genesis Record and the Genesis Flood.
No, I got the Hendrickson publication, the paper quality isn't as good as the walmart one - which I also own.
can you make a video about your book collection?
Sonia: Since you are new to the Bible can I make a suggestion. I would advise you before you start following anybody's infallible interpretation of it that you find out the History of the Bible. How it came into existence and why?
I believe a bible without the Aleph Tavs in place is a neutered bible. Am I off base there and why?
When you can show us a manuscript that says Jesus is the Aleph tav and not the Alpha and Omega then you can have a translation with it
Have you ever heard of the Rock of Ages KJV Bible? I have one. Its really good. Verily I tell you.
No phonetic text is inerrant, not even the original autographs. It part, this is the reason Jesus Christ came. It's critical to understand the limitations of phonetic text as a method of reproducing *sounds* rather than *meaning*. This is the reason Paul (and many others) say that the "letter kills." In a different passage he says "So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God." Simply put, this implies that there is a spoken Word or an expressed Word that is the source of *hearinrg* as an external sense, and it implies that the internal hearing of sounds produced by reading phonetic text may be misleading.
Now, this doesn't seem to me to be due to some Alexandrian doctrine, but is the simple meaning of the text as it is written subject to comparison. It presents an enigma, and the breakthrough that clarifies the enigma is something each of us must actually experience. I can suggest things about human sense, both internal and external, but this is just reason which should be only the servant of truth and not the leader. (In terms of history, the texts of the Torah were not written down in a phonetic alphabet until around the 6th Century BC at the time of the Captivity. Prior to that they were oral, or perhaps some were hieroglyphic, even though the phonetic alphabet had been invented approximately 1400 years earlier in 1900 BC.
The doctrine that the writings were the "Word of God" is something you don't find until the invention of print. The reason for this is that prior to print, scriptures were transcribed by scribes and the writings were so precious that no one read them in solitude. They were read aloud and memorized. This role of memory and the role of the "voice" within a community of faith is critical, and it isn't comprehensible once the printing press comes on the scene. This is why there is a distinction between Renaissance, Enlightenment, and Reformation. They are not the same thing. The Reformation was the product of the Enlightenment, not of the Renaissance. The Renaissance took place during the manuscript era, *before* print. The printing press changes everything. It even creates visual perspective in art. This explains the *timing* of Jesus Christ's Incarnation on the Earth, and the reason why a post-print era can't understand the meaning of the Incarnation. Instead of worshipping the Word they worship "the letter" (which is what the Greeks called, "the dragon's teeth."
What about life app bible? And everyone should be thanking God the text w translated or we wouldn't have the privilege of knowing him.
Husky393xp;
I was looking for a good reference bible when I watched your video.
You recommended the "Common Man's Bible" quite highly, so I ordered one.
The quality was very good, although I'm used to a different type of paper used for the pages. The paper felt a little lower quality, however I'm not an expert on paper. It may very well be of the highest grade. I also liked the fact that it was made in the U.S.A.
It seemed a decent enough bible, so I just accepted it for what it was.
However... (You knew there was a "however" coming didn't you?)
I was reading Revelation, and came to Rev. 16:13, pertaining to the three "unclean spirits" coming out of the mouths of the "dragon", the "beast", and the "false prophet"... spoken of as "spirits like frogs". I read the footnote by D. Hoffman, and I thought "Wow that's really strange... maybe for some strange reason he's injecting a personal brand of off the wall humor. He gave references and most were speaking of the "prince of this world"; But the last reference given was Zechariah 5:2. That's where it got really strange.
The folks that I ordered bible from were very gracious and helpful in allowing me to return the bible.
Please read those footnotes yourself and let me know what you think.
Tony
Not trying to steal Bro. Brian's thunder, but David Hoffman is my pastor. He often throws out some very strange and wild ideas. I just take what lines up with Scripture, and throw out the rest. I haven't used my CMRB in months. It's on a shelf in the box it came with. Honestly, not a really big fan, after reading some of the notes
What do you think of the Jimmy Swaggart bible.