@ Stealth : You are an exeptional commentator in the game (Wargame) and your taktics-analysis is awesome… I guess I will buy this game cause of you ;-) BUT if you are playing, you are not concentrating that much in gaming yourself. I´ve watched many of your Videos (and they are great by the way) and when you are playing yourself you are very often loosing track, cause you are overwatching your teammembers and commentate their actions. That is sometimes disturbing, cause viewers will think : "Wtf... dude, you had a plan 30sec before… what are you doing now?!?... have you forgotten?!?" ->for example in this game : when you got the Points for a 3rd plane and found something on Right flank to shoot at to aid the Team, you decided to look arround on left (Maybe to look for better target) and commentate those player-aktions. While doing that you totaly forgot what you wanted to do. So later on you got shoot at by SAS over those hills. Don´t get me wrong, I love to watch your Videos, but sometimes you loose track ;-)
I had chosen the MIG-29M because you get cluster bombs which can hurt vehicles better than any regular bomb what you missed in that situation and it has the long range missles and medium stealth so it can be a strike-fighter out of nowhere
Even if you supported your team only with the Air Force, that was a very nice round. But one question I would have Stealth. You have to admit that you were lucky that the opponent brought so little air defense into the game ?! To rely on so few expensive units is a bit risky ?! Nevertheless, please more of it B)
@3:28 oh French transports? Gotta be mobile SAM with them (Crotale) and then the one guy sends out his Peace Rhine, can tell he is panicked and wants to deny you the area, might only be only 1x mobile AAA, MANPAD or AAA at best (unless something is coming up in 30 sec) I miss playing this game even though it is fairly limited... Eugen needs to simply work on the engine, e.g.: - Basic QoL stuff such as: hotkeys to turn off radar sets, more color/better coded smoke signals for teammates, UI improvements - Simple RoE for units; maybe certain units like radar AAA, SAMs, units with ATGMs - More realistic tank ranges maybe? & armor penetration more like Combat Mission games. - I never liked ships, never played on maps with them usually... I'd rather have prop planes - In line with my last point, better emphasis on earlier 1960s units (more of them across both sides so it can be somewhat competitive), feels like this was better in AirLand Battle (but only slightly) - Spotting system to be slightly better (some recon units feel kinda meh) - Changing air system for fixed & rotary wing for generality of 3 or 4 heights, from hugging the ground to 10k meters (hugging ground, low, med, ?high?) & subsequent effects on AAA, radar, recon - Better pathfinding for units - Ability for SOME modular loads for certain units (fixed wing makes the most sense), but Eugen has said previously it would make balance difficult I'm craving Wargame: Red Dragon & Combat Mission. However on the latter part of that - from playing the demos, everything Battlefront has made after BtB & Afrika Korps feels kinda meh. Focusing too much on graphics & complicating their UI instead of core gameplay. I didn't find Red Thunder or Shock Force 2 particularly fun, kind of confusing really. Between camera movement, lack of LoS tool, and having Real Time + Plan & Go feels like they lost their touch. Or I'm just tarded? Not sure.
What does 10 vs 10 'tactical' mean? Does the 'tactical' refer to a game setting? Also how many points did each team member start with in this game? Sorry for beginner questions.
Ok I went back to beginning and saw that the starting points are 125 which is low - I guess this is what they are doing in a tactical game, starting with low points and trying to grab territory for more.
Also im like half a year late and u probably learned it already A tactical Game is based on Low startingpoints and a Low income. The Units are better to be Micromanaged because u have less to control aka tactical gameplay
Sometimes your Plane gameplay is questionable at best :D Without Ground units from yourself its...iffy sometimes. Especially iffy and *very* questionable when you have ground units at times :)
Mechanized focuses on IFV: vehicles with infantry and autocannons. It has decent tank support. Motorized is extremely fast but fragile transport and no tanks. It's meant to make use of a hole in enemy lines and push through quickly.
![Megan Thee Stallion - Mamushi (Remix) [feat. TWICE] [Official Audio]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/5c0_u9PsrsQ/mqdefault.jpg)
I believe the best way to pronounce Fedor is "Foxtrot"
😂
You may want to add a Mig 21 with rocket pods into this deck for some low cost punch vs inf and vehicle sniping.
@ Stealth :
You are an exeptional commentator in the game (Wargame) and your taktics-analysis is awesome… I guess I will buy this game cause of you ;-)
BUT if you are playing, you are not concentrating that much in gaming yourself. I´ve watched many of your Videos (and they are great by the way) and when you are playing yourself you are very often loosing track, cause you are overwatching your teammembers and commentate their actions.
That is sometimes disturbing, cause viewers will think : "Wtf... dude, you had a plan 30sec before… what are you doing now?!?... have you forgotten?!?" ->for example in this game : when you got the Points for a 3rd plane and found something on Right flank to shoot at to aid the Team, you decided to look arround on left (Maybe to look for better target) and commentate those player-aktions. While doing that you totaly forgot what you wanted to do. So later on you got shoot at by SAS over those hills.
Don´t get me wrong, I love to watch your Videos, but sometimes you loose track ;-)
I had chosen the MIG-29M because you get cluster bombs which can hurt vehicles better than any regular bomb what you missed in that situation and it has the long range missles and medium stealth so it can be a strike-fighter out of nowhere
this video might got so meany dislikes because it is not mudfight
And here I was thinking that people were tired of Mudfight...
he's just joking
BOOOHH!!! More Mudfight battles! I demand it!! :p
if it's not clear to anyone the comment was a joke
that longbow had many lifes like a cat
Longbow finally nixed at 25:14
Haters gonna hate!!
It was a good video,stealth
Thanks, appreciate it :)
Loved seeing a non-mudfight map! Keep 'em coming.
Yes
Already 5 dislikes no likes? you have ruffled some feathers stealth.
Yeah I guess so.
It's because Skynet is in the video.
It's a different Skynet by the looks of it, just seems a few people are somewhat displeased.
Wait are you talking about the Skynet that is always in chat? And also why are people disliking him ?
Its MAGIC Yeah i talk to him every now and then. I tend to annoy him a lot
Faster than UPS, that's for sure!
8:18: There was one guy left in that BGS squad. You dropped 30 bombs to kill ONE guy.
"Our -arrows- bombs will blot out the Sun!"
Love your commentary - always educational.
And btw, your english is exceptional.
Thanks :)
Where do you come from, Stealth?
the word "educational" is exactly for him
The UPS: the Unrealistically Painful Soviet.
lmfao
What's up with the Like to dislike ratio
whats up with the dislikes?
you can rearm helo without fobs. just land near supplies. :)
i miss this kind of videos :(
When playing rock, paper, scissors...don't use paper when facing scissors!
hellos that stick around gets heatclustered. that longbow was asking for it.
People like you are why I always went for infrared, and never had anything with radar emissions, except the "MURICA LAUNCHER".
Took me only five minutes to notice that its not a replay...
Even if you supported your team only with the Air Force, that was a very nice round. But one question I would have Stealth. You have to admit that you were lucky that the opponent
brought so little air defense into the game ?! To rely on so few expensive units is a bit risky ?! Nevertheless, please more of it B)
"Pizza delivery, en route."
Isn't Crotale IR and not targetable by SEADs?
But a sead has good ecm. U can dry out FlaRak with them pretty easy
@3:28 oh French transports? Gotta be mobile SAM with them (Crotale) and then the one guy sends out his Peace Rhine, can tell he is panicked and wants to deny you the area, might only be only 1x mobile AAA, MANPAD or AAA at best (unless something is coming up in 30 sec)
I miss playing this game even though it is fairly limited... Eugen needs to simply work on the engine, e.g.:
- Basic QoL stuff such as: hotkeys to turn off radar sets, more color/better coded smoke signals for teammates, UI improvements
- Simple RoE for units; maybe certain units like radar AAA, SAMs, units with ATGMs
- More realistic tank ranges maybe? & armor penetration more like Combat Mission games.
- I never liked ships, never played on maps with them usually... I'd rather have prop planes
- In line with my last point, better emphasis on earlier 1960s units (more of them across both sides so it can be somewhat competitive), feels like this was better in AirLand Battle (but only slightly)
- Spotting system to be slightly better (some recon units feel kinda meh)
- Changing air system for fixed & rotary wing for generality of 3 or 4 heights, from hugging the ground to 10k meters (hugging ground, low, med, ?high?) & subsequent effects on AAA, radar, recon
- Better pathfinding for units
- Ability for SOME modular loads for certain units (fixed wing makes the most sense), but Eugen has said previously it would make balance difficult
I'm craving Wargame: Red Dragon & Combat Mission. However on the latter part of that - from playing the demos, everything Battlefront has made after BtB & Afrika Korps feels kinda meh. Focusing too much on graphics & complicating their UI instead of core gameplay. I didn't find Red Thunder or Shock Force 2 particularly fun, kind of confusing really. Between camera movement, lack of LoS tool, and having Real Time + Plan & Go feels like they lost their touch. Or I'm just tarded? Not sure.
What does 10 vs 10 'tactical' mean? Does the 'tactical' refer to a game setting? Also how many points did each team member start with in this game? Sorry for beginner questions.
Ok I went back to beginning and saw that the starting points are 125 which is low - I guess this is what they are doing in a tactical game, starting with low points and trying to grab territory for more.
Also im like half a year late and u probably learned it already
A tactical Game is based on Low startingpoints and a Low income. The Units are better to be Micromanaged because u have less to control aka tactical gameplay
i swear people dislike this just for the lols
(or because it isnt the replay i sent?)
Yeah I probably pissed off some sub-group from the community. Well boys, have fun disliking, I hope it brings you the joy you're looking for!
goddammit stealth! you are just being trolled, no one is pissed
(i will upvote just for good measure)
Sometimes your Plane gameplay is questionable at best :D Without Ground units from yourself its...iffy sometimes. Especially iffy and *very* questionable when you have ground units at times :)
Deck code?
Keep up for the good work ;)
Is the Su-24m usefull in Mudfight?
What is the diffrence between mechanized and motorized?
Mechanized focuses on IFV: vehicles with infantry and autocannons. It has decent tank support. Motorized is extremely fast but fragile transport and no tanks. It's meant to make use of a hole in enemy lines and push through quickly.
Stealth17 Gaming thanks stealth!
Why the dislikes ? Thumbs up for me :)
3dislikes? i cant beliebe it
i feel the obligation to make the like/dislike ration to exceed 50%
cant upvote on mobile so.... ^
may I ask where you're from stealth?
The Netherlands
Why 16 dislikes ?
No Mudfight