A Bozooka??? Wouldn't effect a M1A2 and Ho much armor does these EV battle tanks actually have. I was a M1 Armor Crewman and The power to push a heavy armored vehicle has to be tremendous. NO BATTERY POWERED MOTOR would handle this plus operate are the electronic equipment inside the tank ao the battery life in a battlefeild condition would last a couple hours. This will get many soldiers killed it's not practical
Who need power station ? as magogian i can say just put parendev permanent magnet motor+generator inside that tanks, that will make that tanks operate 24 hour x 7 days non stop without need charging station but that electric tank get power from parendev generator device.
These nay sayers in the comments section are so narrow minded. Do any of you realize how loud a tank is just at idle? If it work better tactically, then they are good addition.
I guess the cons outweighs the single pro, why would u care about idle noise when the weight of the tank itself will be so noisy anyways, and big to see target. Battery also means it explodes frying everyone instantly more easily, having to charge, limited range considering the weight of the ammo you have to carry, imagine a single tank round weighing close to a person's weight. Makes no sense for such regressive tech.
When this comes out ! I want you to be the first to go into battle with this thing ! I’ll come to your Funeral ! Oh Wait ! I won’t be able to because if your hit with an Anti tank Weapon you’ll be Instantly Cremated As soon as that Battery Catches on fire !
@@CptAngelKGamingEV tech has a lot more instances of catching on fire, from the disastrous London electric buses to the myriad of American and Chinese EVs. So no they are not even remotely close, EV vehicles are far far more dangerous than their gasoline based counterparts.
will they have to tow a diesel generator behind them to keep the charge up when far from base, or will the enemy put in charging stations for them when behind lines etc
if they were to fully electric, they'd probably push solar technology to be more effective while driving. that way, they could longer between charges. though, we'll see what the future holds. military tech works in mysterious ways
@@MiniCerberus991lol that's okay for the summer but next to useless in winter. The panels on my van can run a few lights, boil a few kettles of water and a fridge but in winter it might be 1 kettle per day. Real dumb to put solar panels on a tank.
So when they run out of juice they gona sit in middle of the fire line and charge for 72 hrs😂😂😂😂😂 not possible or logical fuel takes 3/5 mins to fuel back up and get tf out of dodge or is their going to be Tesla charging stations in middle of desert so they can super charge in 45 mins lmfao smh it’s not logical
@@Body_Model I personally think it's a stupid impractical idea. That's just me though. My father who's been more than involved with warfare in his life would also laugh at the idea. Just saying.
I think you are just missing the "autonomous" (or unmanned). Basically you could just drop them in the combat zone and control them remotely. Especially in the front lines.
Your Future Not mine Or Americas ! You and your Whacko DemoRat Rads Are the only people that are scammed by that Agenda ! I’m 72 and this planet was doomed 60 years ago ! Guess what the Earth is still Here !
If it can match the range of a conventional tank, an electric tank would be clearly superior. Less noise and heat signature. More reliable and less exhaust for the crew to deal with.
It doesn't need just range of the diesel/turbine engine MBT, it needs more critically the capability to recharge as fast as you can refuel those two other types, and gain the same range as before. You as well still need lot of other lubrication oils in the vehicles to maintain them operational for day (example Bradley consumes about 25 liters of all kind other oils per day, not just fuel). If that could get rid off, it is more question of the design and engineering than EV, as Soviets and Russia has designed theirs to be very robust and very easy to maintain. The turbine engine benefit is that you can refuel it with anything. It doesn't matter do you have a gasoline, diesel, kerosene or even seed oil, it will run and you can keep going. In emergency situation you can put a one barrel of any fuel, or just get two jerrycans (20L each) and even run at the vehicle, pour them in tank in matter of seconds, and you have capability to drive that out from risky position for few kilometers. But I tell you, one of the benefits of the current engines is, that even when you pierce the fuel tank and it sets on fire, the automatic fire suppression system works and puts down the plausible fire inside for the crew to escape. Do you guess what happens when you pierce that extremely volatile and sensitive battery? You get fire that you can not stop for anything. It will burn the whole thing down in seconds, no suppression system capable to help crew to escape etc. If they can make the batteries swappable. Literally that you open hatches, raise the box out and then insert new one in. And be able to do that in 5 minutes. Now we would be talking about something. But still very inconvenient as you can't do that on the field without that support vehicle. As with with fuel you just need the pipe and either pump or use gravity to refuel vehicle to vehicle.
@@paristopretty sure they will be hot swappable. That's what the video alludes to. China company NiO already designs swappable EV cars so the technology is present. Tesla batteries are also hot swappable although it's only done after it's out of service. The biggest issue is most definitely fire. Holy moly, if a car Ev battery can't be put out 😭 these tank batteries are huge and absolutely won't be able to be put out and they'll burn for a week, maybe a month. Now US fire departments are working on new fire suppression technology and techniques for EV batteries. I think it's a good idea to implement but I don't see our military going fully electric in our lifetime. I think the little vehicle drone is cool. Reminds me of Optimus Prime little trailer vehicle, minicons 😅
@paristo Aluminum air battery. They are non rechargeable but has higher energy density of 1300 Wh/kg. To compare this diesel has an effective energy density of 1700 Wh/kg. Researchers say they can upgrade this battery's density into 2000 Wh/kg with some technologies .
you compare a tank with a car? tanks would need a lot of time to refuel, and bringing a fuel to a battlefield is dumb, imagine a huge fuel tank truck in the middle of battle field that was ready to blow up.
Electric tank hahahahahahahaha:? My God, look at how the Teslas explode. If the tank has a battery 10 times larger than that of a Tesla, then in the event of a mine explosion or a tank being hit by an RPG, all the people in the tank will be fried instantly. This is the most useless invention in the history of mankind hahahaha
If the US military put a little motor and use electric motors as a primary source of momentum for any of these vehicles they would be faster and better operating than any combustion based vehicle they have right now. Creating hybrid system is smarter it makes it fuel last longer and it helps your operators in the battlefield. But they should limit the size of the combustion motor it's always nice to have one that's more efficient but decreasing the heat signature on any vehicle in the battlefield is good.
The only issue is the battery itself. Prius made a car like you describe but at 140,000 miles it is recommended you replace the $5,000.00 battery. How do you dispose of it? Can we expect advancements in batteries themselves? I'm not opposed to including solar panels in some kits they are portable and as far as I know have a long life span.
Idk if this is the way to go. Still in the ME, so if they were solar powered, great choice. But as the front changes, this is not the way to go. A hybrid is better than full electric
@@Body_Model If you read the context, it is about Nissan's E-power idea. Where you have example a small 1.4L gasoline motor as generator, and then you have electric vehicle otherwise doing all normal stuff. The challenge in the 50 ton vehicle movement is that you need huge motor to get it going. But as challenge is not just the mass, it is the situation, you are in combat or you are on danger area, you do not have changes or time to recharge the vehicle or swap battery or do other things. That is the benefit of a turbine motor that you can run it with anything that burns, gasoline, diesel, various oils, kerosene etc. You just fill liquid in tank and run it. And that is the challenge for any electric vehicle, you can not have couple soldiers running to your vehicle with Jerry canisters in both hands (5.3 gallons in both hands) and just in minute or two refuel the military vehicle for it to get away from dangerous place or to increase its operation time. Example, M1 Abrams has 505 gallons fuel tank. It consumes 10 gallons per hour on idle, 30 gallons in operational idle and 60 gallons per hour when moving. Two soldiers can carry quickly over 20 gallons of fuel to M1 Abrams, and fill it in as quickly as you can just get it out from the canister. That gives the M1 Abrams capability to run 2 hours on idle (keep it just running), or have it 40 minutes in combat capable (turn turret, have systems active, fire), or give it a 20 minutes worth of mobility to get away from the bad situation. Now try that with ANY electric vehicle. So having a diesel/turbine engine that will power the MBT, and then have a additional tiny electric motor with small battery that would give that 20-30 min operational time for silent running, and you have situation that it would be far better than having fully electric MBT that you can't recharge at any given moment easily.
@@paristo We have ways to go before we start seeing an all electric Tank. Hybrids yes as they said in the video. Once they make advancements in battery technology, such as range, charging time, weight, etc. then yes.
@@Body_Model The advancements in battery technology is currently plateaued. Last 2 decades battery advancements you have heard are very minor really for use like required here. Main benefits has been the electricity consumption advancement, not so much battery itself. And even then, a one diesel truck can deliver fuel to the whole company. Where a one battery truck can deliver power to two MBT. And what help is from MBT silence anyways in battlefields, when artillery will make everyone deaf for hours before the engagement.... A electric recon vehicle? Count me in! A electric quad bike or just a motocross bike and of course a electric armored recon car... You get a point...
You really can't think of technology progressing past where it is right now can you? Cruise ships use electric drive motors because they are more powerful and efficient than diesel running the motors so the diesel runs generators that power the motors. Until battery advances I see tanks using electric motors with batteries and a motor to charge on the go like hybrid cars do. Tanks would be faster, more agile and quieter when needed. The diesel engine would need to be far less powerful and fuel hungry making logistics a lot easier. Bases would be able to charge them up from time to time further offsetting the need for shipping oil all over again making logistics easier. Wars are won and lost over logistics
Many submarines are battery powered.... They are called nuclear powered submarines. And even diesel submarines has batteries. The problem with the diesel is that you can't stay silent or low noise when you run it, why you have electric motors to do that. And problem with them is that batteries run empty in hours, length of the combat. At some point you need to engage diesel engine and reveal your position.
You think submarines are running diesel while submerged? My dad was on a submarine 60 years ago and when submerged it ran on batteries. That battery tech is ancient and still worked. Current batteries last multiple times longer. It's quite obvious your talking on topics you have no clue about
@@spatease1028 modern submarines run on nuclear power. I was teasing the idea of battery powered tanks. Obviously, you don’t know what you’re talking about from the beginning.
If you've ever been directly involved in warfighting, you already know this is the dumbest idea ever.
Yeah ! The Tank becomes a Crematorium when hit with a Bazooka or Anti tank weapon !
A Bozooka??? Wouldn't effect a M1A2 and Ho much armor does these EV battle tanks actually have. I was a M1 Armor Crewman and The power to push a heavy armored vehicle has to be tremendous. NO BATTERY POWERED MOTOR would handle this plus operate are the electronic equipment inside the tank ao the battery life in a battlefeild condition would last a couple hours. This will get many soldiers killed it's not practical
Does that girl look like she's ever been involved directly in war fighting?
EMP bombs?
A traditional diesel powered tank can be tracked from space due to their heat signature. Those turbo diesels are sitting ducks.
LOLOLOL hold on , I need to find a charging station!
I agree. Yes commander. I'll be there to offer support in two hours. I'm at 33% charge.
Who need power station ? as magogian i can say just put parendev permanent magnet motor+generator inside that tanks, that will make that tanks operate 24 hour x 7 days non stop without need charging station but that electric tank get power from parendev generator device.
yea ur right. cuz existing tanks dont need to refuel or running out of fuel out on the field would never happen cuz battles have strict schedules
@@aliens5142 logistics is a key factor to refueling. How long will a tank have to sit to recharge verses how long it takes to refuel in battle zones.
@@-TheOracle- cuz they went use fast charging tech right? they need the sun up for solar power right?
Stop shooting, does any body have a charging port? 😂😂
These nay sayers in the comments section are so narrow minded. Do any of you realize how loud a tank is just at idle? If it work better tactically, then they are good addition.
I guess the cons outweighs the single pro, why would u care about idle noise when the weight of the tank itself will be so noisy anyways, and big to see target. Battery also means it explodes frying everyone instantly more easily, having to charge, limited range considering the weight of the ammo you have to carry, imagine a single tank round weighing close to a person's weight. Makes no sense for such regressive tech.
When this comes out ! I want you to be the first to go into battle with this thing ! I’ll come to your Funeral ! Oh Wait ! I won’t be able to because if your hit with an Anti tank Weapon you’ll be Instantly Cremated As soon as that Battery Catches on fire !
@@stevesanzari7294 does the military not do funerals anymore for people who died in battle even if their body is not recovered?
@@stevesanzari7294 Yeah because the crew burning inide the tank is totally unheard of. Never happened before. Those damn EVs right? lmao
@@CptAngelKGamingEV tech has a lot more instances of catching on fire, from the disastrous London electric buses to the myriad of American and Chinese EVs. So no they are not even remotely close, EV vehicles are far far more dangerous than their gasoline based counterparts.
will they have to tow a diesel generator behind them to keep the charge up when far from base, or will the enemy put in charging stations for them when behind lines etc
How do they fill up tanks when they run out of gas in the field?
if they were to fully electric, they'd probably push solar technology to be more effective while driving. that way, they could longer between charges. though, we'll see what the future holds. military tech works in mysterious ways
@@MiniCerberus991lol that's okay for the summer but next to useless in winter. The panels on my van can run a few lights, boil a few kettles of water and a fridge but in winter it might be 1 kettle per day. Real dumb to put solar panels on a tank.
Nocked out by an EMP. This isn't ready for the battlefield.
So when they run out of juice they gona sit in middle of the fire line and charge for 72 hrs😂😂😂😂😂 not possible or logical fuel takes 3/5 mins to fuel back up and get tf out of dodge or is their going to be Tesla charging stations in middle of desert so they can super charge in 45 mins lmfao smh it’s not logical
Another vanity project. Maybe the russians will take the bait and invest r&D into making their own 😅
I'm sure Ellon Musk would be the first person to come out with the first all electric tank.
He himself said that the idea of an electric tank is not worthwhile.
@@christidechattilon9111 He's probably saying that so the competition won't beat him first at it.
@@Body_Model I personally think it's a stupid impractical idea. That's just me though. My father who's been more than involved with warfare in his life would also laugh at the idea. Just saying.
I've seen EVs burn after getting a den in the battery so what's and IED gonna do to a massive tank battery!
@@rich-bk7md You've seen EV's burn? LOL Considering they have a very low chance of burning I highly doubt you've seen it other than on YT.
Electric engine, auto loaded, anti tank and air surpressing support wpn.
I think you are just missing the "autonomous" (or unmanned). Basically you could just drop them in the combat zone and control them remotely. Especially in the front lines.
@@TheEmperor000 A tank needs need to be loaded manually to fire.
@@Body_Model ever heard of autoloaders?..
@@CptAngelKGaming That's not how tanks work.
Cut off any source power and it dies on the battlefield. Bad idea.
Green 💚 is the future 🤣
Your Future Not mine Or Americas ! You and your Whacko DemoRat Rads Are the only people that are scammed by that Agenda ! I’m 72 and this planet was doomed 60 years ago !
Guess what the Earth is still Here !
YOU CAN BET RUSSIA AND CHINA WILL FOLLOW THIS IDEA SOON....I DONT THINK.
If it can match the range of a conventional tank, an electric tank would be clearly superior. Less noise and heat signature. More reliable and less exhaust for the crew to deal with.
It doesn't need just range of the diesel/turbine engine MBT, it needs more critically the capability to recharge as fast as you can refuel those two other types, and gain the same range as before.
You as well still need lot of other lubrication oils in the vehicles to maintain them operational for day (example Bradley consumes about 25 liters of all kind other oils per day, not just fuel). If that could get rid off, it is more question of the design and engineering than EV, as Soviets and Russia has designed theirs to be very robust and very easy to maintain.
The turbine engine benefit is that you can refuel it with anything. It doesn't matter do you have a gasoline, diesel, kerosene or even seed oil, it will run and you can keep going. In emergency situation you can put a one barrel of any fuel, or just get two jerrycans (20L each) and even run at the vehicle, pour them in tank in matter of seconds, and you have capability to drive that out from risky position for few kilometers.
But I tell you, one of the benefits of the current engines is, that even when you pierce the fuel tank and it sets on fire, the automatic fire suppression system works and puts down the plausible fire inside for the crew to escape. Do you guess what happens when you pierce that extremely volatile and sensitive battery? You get fire that you can not stop for anything. It will burn the whole thing down in seconds, no suppression system capable to help crew to escape etc.
If they can make the batteries swappable. Literally that you open hatches, raise the box out and then insert new one in. And be able to do that in 5 minutes. Now we would be talking about something. But still very inconvenient as you can't do that on the field without that support vehicle. As with with fuel you just need the pipe and either pump or use gravity to refuel vehicle to vehicle.
@@paristopretty sure they will be hot swappable. That's what the video alludes to. China company NiO already designs swappable EV cars so the technology is present. Tesla batteries are also hot swappable although it's only done after it's out of service.
The biggest issue is most definitely fire. Holy moly, if a car Ev battery can't be put out 😭 these tank batteries are huge and absolutely won't be able to be put out and they'll burn for a week, maybe a month. Now US fire departments are working on new fire suppression technology and techniques for EV batteries.
I think it's a good idea to implement but I don't see our military going fully electric in our lifetime.
I think the little vehicle drone is cool. Reminds me of Optimus Prime little trailer vehicle, minicons 😅
@paristo Aluminum air battery. They are non rechargeable but has higher energy density of 1300 Wh/kg. To compare this diesel has an effective energy density of 1700 Wh/kg. Researchers say they can upgrade this battery's density into 2000 Wh/kg with some technologies
.
Hybrid, yes. All electric tank? probably not because in the chaos of war you need to be able to refuel in a couple of minutes quickly.
A car cannot fill up in a couple minutes forget a tank.
you compare a tank with a car?
tanks would need a lot of time to refuel, and bringing a fuel to a battlefield is dumb, imagine a huge fuel tank truck in the middle of battle field that was ready to blow up.
Ok 5 minutes @@Body_Model
@@ForganMreeman-0maybe the fuel nozzle for a tank is bigger than a cars fuels nozzle. I have no idea.
@@lemdixon01More like 10 to 15 minutes.
Electric tank hahahahahahahaha:? My God, look at how the Teslas explode. If the tank has a battery 10 times larger than that of a Tesla, then in the event of a mine explosion or a tank being hit by an RPG, all the people in the tank will be fried instantly. This is the most useless invention in the history of mankind hahahaha
It Doubles as a Crematorium Too ! That’s joes Plan !
I bet she knows what she is talking about
They will come in rainbow color too...
Just make it cheap price than the engine. Theres gonna be lot of people using it for combat. And not a joke anymore
Stop developing killing machines ✊🏾
Coexist ✊🏾🌎🙏🇺🇦💙☮️
If the US military put a little motor and use electric motors as a primary source of momentum for any of these vehicles they would be faster and better operating than any combustion based vehicle they have right now. Creating hybrid system is smarter it makes it fuel last longer and it helps your operators in the battlefield. But they should limit the size of the combustion motor it's always nice to have one that's more efficient but decreasing the heat signature on any vehicle in the battlefield is good.
The only issue is the battery itself. Prius made a car like you describe but at 140,000 miles it is recommended you replace the $5,000.00 battery. How do you dispose of it? Can we expect advancements in batteries themselves? I'm not opposed to including solar panels in some kits they are portable and as far as I know have a long life span.
Stupidest Idea Ever ! Where are you plugging in an Electric Tank in the Field ?
@@stevesanzari7294yes! Grid strikes would take out electric tanks.
@@stevesanzari7294in WW2 they cutt off gas ⛽️ to other countries. So they can defeat them in wars. Reducing there electricity would be easier.
@@stevesanzari7294 He's talking about a hybrid open your eyes
Definitely going to need hot swappable batteries.
Put solar panels on the roof and make it out of lifhtweight plastic 😅
EMP entered the chat
Emp doesn't work on electronics that are enclosed into a metal box you know. faraday cage 😉
Idk if this is the way to go. Still in the ME, so if they were solar powered, great choice. But as the front changes, this is not the way to go. A hybrid is better than full electric
It’s more dangerous ! These Batteries when on fire Become a Crematorium and with fuel in them Become a Bomb !
@@stevesanzari7294 New batteries burn slower and in the future they are not going to be flammable.
@@stevesanzari7294 You're talking about a vehicle already filled with fuel, oil and AMMO. Battery is the least of your concerns..
20% energy density of oil
It will look like a tank needing a charge out in the open.
A traditional diesel powered tank can be tracked from space due to their heat signature. Those turbo diesels are sitting ducks.
@TheUniversalEyes
So, other than a few countries. Having satellites Diesel tanks are still better.
stealth tank
Trump 2024
Send those who wanted EV tanks into the battlefield to test this and come back from the after life to tell us if it worked
ok captain dumb dumb
A diesel-electric would be better.
yes it ís
Yeah the fire could Last Longer ! When the Battery Blows and catches fire !
No just plain No
Gonna be awhile before we see Electric military vehicles, I see charging being an issue
Nissan's e-power would be great solution for MBT.
It could be. When you need to be silent, you go fully electric for the few moments. And then when you need power, you use diesel motor.
@@paristo Electric motors generator more power.
@@Body_Model If you read the context, it is about Nissan's E-power idea. Where you have example a small 1.4L gasoline motor as generator, and then you have electric vehicle otherwise doing all normal stuff.
The challenge in the 50 ton vehicle movement is that you need huge motor to get it going. But as challenge is not just the mass, it is the situation, you are in combat or you are on danger area, you do not have changes or time to recharge the vehicle or swap battery or do other things.
That is the benefit of a turbine motor that you can run it with anything that burns, gasoline, diesel, various oils, kerosene etc. You just fill liquid in tank and run it.
And that is the challenge for any electric vehicle, you can not have couple soldiers running to your vehicle with Jerry canisters in both hands (5.3 gallons in both hands) and just in minute or two refuel the military vehicle for it to get away from dangerous place or to increase its operation time.
Example, M1 Abrams has 505 gallons fuel tank. It consumes 10 gallons per hour on idle, 30 gallons in operational idle and 60 gallons per hour when moving.
Two soldiers can carry quickly over 20 gallons of fuel to M1 Abrams, and fill it in as quickly as you can just get it out from the canister. That gives the M1 Abrams capability to run 2 hours on idle (keep it just running), or have it 40 minutes in combat capable (turn turret, have systems active, fire), or give it a 20 minutes worth of mobility to get away from the bad situation.
Now try that with ANY electric vehicle.
So having a diesel/turbine engine that will power the MBT, and then have a additional tiny electric motor with small battery that would give that 20-30 min operational time for silent running, and you have situation that it would be far better than having fully electric MBT that you can't recharge at any given moment easily.
@@paristo We have ways to go before we start seeing an all electric Tank. Hybrids yes as they said in the video. Once they make advancements in battery technology, such as range, charging time, weight, etc. then yes.
@@Body_Model The advancements in battery technology is currently plateaued. Last 2 decades battery advancements you have heard are very minor really for use like required here.
Main benefits has been the electricity consumption advancement, not so much battery itself.
And even then, a one diesel truck can deliver fuel to the whole company. Where a one battery truck can deliver power to two MBT.
And what help is from MBT silence anyways in battlefields, when artillery will make everyone deaf for hours before the engagement....
A electric recon vehicle? Count me in!
A electric quad bike or just a motocross bike and of course a electric armored recon car... You get a point...
Be realistic and build transformers, terminators and get rid of the world faster
Megan Eckstein, nice front.😍
*Amy Farrah Fowler* you look so pretty
so your dragging a extra load of batteries , that would be a perfect target for some to take out lol
How do you think they presently fuel tanks. Portable diesel tank, awesome target!
There will be three tractor trailer flat bed trucks following the tank at all times on the battle field loaded with replacement batteries.
Good idea
Current tanks get .6 miles to the gallon so you already have a line of support vehicles following tanks.
This is great in 30 below weather, great idea, but we still need more diversity. When the tank run out of power, we'll ask for a time out!
Wow, save the planet!
You really can't think of technology progressing past where it is right now can you? Cruise ships use electric drive motors because they are more powerful and efficient than diesel running the motors so the diesel runs generators that power the motors. Until battery advances I see tanks using electric motors with batteries and a motor to charge on the go like hybrid cars do. Tanks would be faster, more agile and quieter when needed. The diesel engine would need to be far less powerful and fuel hungry making logistics a lot easier. Bases would be able to charge them up from time to time further offsetting the need for shipping oil all over again making logistics easier. Wars are won and lost over logistics
When are we going to have electric F-18s and battery powered submarines?
Many submarines are battery powered.... They are called nuclear powered submarines.
And even diesel submarines has batteries. The problem with the diesel is that you can't stay silent or low noise when you run it, why you have electric motors to do that. And problem with them is that batteries run empty in hours, length of the combat. At some point you need to engage diesel engine and reveal your position.
You think submarines are running diesel while submerged? My dad was on a submarine 60 years ago and when submerged it ran on batteries. That battery tech is ancient and still worked. Current batteries last multiple times longer. It's quite obvious your talking on topics you have no clue about
@@spatease1028 modern submarines run on nuclear power. I was teasing the idea of battery powered tanks. Obviously, you don’t know what you’re talking about from the beginning.
You are so transparent. "Just stop oil" type.
range: 10 feet per charge