It bothers me too. I think you should discuss this video. I think people don't want to say their interpretation because they fear sounding stupid or being wrong. It's art.People are mostly afraid of having their thoughts exposed. What is making people like this? Or it could possibly be that the video is too short for them to base an opinion.
Sometimes it's painful hearing artists talk about their art. I see it and I get a different message. I don't really pay attention to the light or changes of color that he's talking about. I wonder if artists really want people to understand something or if they want the art to just be? I don't know how to explain what I mean. I just really like the last few sentences he says. I think that pretty much summed it all up. I guess he considered time in the duration of this video. You can glance at it for 5 minuets and not get the full value of the pokes important message.
@@georgebidgood7278 art can be interpretd in a number of ways; when an artist talks about his art he becomes a critic of sorts and emits an opinion just as valid as any other. There is no correct way or message.
closing his eyes or hurting himself is indeed not art but the feeling that is evoked by the painfully slow frame by frame changes, the exhausting disgust that this very close up visual of an unknown old man so intimate that one can see his pores. all three activities are also associated with an action of cleaning something the dry dirt of sleepy haze collected in one's eyes, the uncomfortable dried muck and then the very clear waxy itch in the ear. Everything about this video evokes a feeling of disgust, discomfort and one cannot also discredit the fact that when this video was made the medium itself was very new and unexplored something as simple as bouncing back and forth recorded on a camera was intriguing in itself.
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
Its sad to me how there is never any discussion under these videos.
It bothers me too. I think you should discuss this video. I think people don't want to say their interpretation because they fear sounding stupid or being wrong. It's art.People are mostly afraid of having their thoughts exposed. What is making people like this? Or it could possibly be that the video is too short for them to base an opinion.
Jaylasplenty It's pure garbage
Sometimes it's painful hearing artists talk about their art. I see it and I get a different message. I don't really pay attention to the light or changes of color that he's talking about. I wonder if artists really want people to understand something or if they want the art to just be? I don't know how to explain what I mean. I just really like the last few sentences he says. I think that pretty much summed it all up. I guess he considered time in the duration of this video. You can glance at it for 5 minuets and not get the full value of the pokes important message.
Neyuerde no
By watching the video you are inherently noticing the way the colours change. That’s what watching a video is.
@@georgebidgood7278 art can be interpretd in a number of ways; when an artist talks about his art he becomes a critic of sorts and emits an opinion just as valid as any other. There is no correct way or message.
Featured on Carmel Artists facebook.com/groups/carmelartists
He closed his eye. Not art.
A man hurting himself is not art.
closing his eyes or hurting himself is indeed not art but the feeling that is evoked by the painfully slow frame by frame changes, the exhausting disgust that this very close up visual of an unknown old man so intimate that one can see his pores. all three activities are also associated with an action of cleaning something the dry dirt of sleepy haze collected in one's eyes, the uncomfortable dried muck and then the very clear waxy itch in the ear. Everything about this video evokes a feeling of disgust, discomfort and one cannot also discredit the fact that when this video was made the medium itself was very new and unexplored something as simple as bouncing back and forth recorded on a camera was intriguing in itself.