Solid rocket booster test
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 сен 2024
- This video shows how technicians at Orbital ATK prepare the solid rocket booster that will be tested March 11, 2015 in Promontory, Utah. The test will be one of two to qualify the motor for flight on the first flight of the Space Launch System in 20
I used to work at ATK (I worked on the military armaments/ equipment side) and I always liked talking to the rocket people at trade shows. The history of that division, originally Thiokol which is now owned by Northrop Grumman, is pretty cool. Their development of mass production of solid fuel was a game changer not only for space programs but for defense with SLBMs/ ICBMs etc. Those SRB motors are amazing and the amount of force they generate is staggering. True workhorses and the epitome of brute force.
Could you elaborate more?
Tell us more please.
I can't imagine how dangerous it is to slap one of those together, good stuff!
Not really that dangerous until it's lit by ignitors.
NO SMOKING PLEASE.
By the cheapest bidder😂😂
People always assume if something is powerful, it must be dangerous. Well, I only need a droplet of a certain chemical to kill a town: Thats Dangerous. If something needs a specific routine to be lit in a controlled way: Thats not.
@@mrsmith2904 you are confusing socialist countries where there is no competition.
‘A fire has broken out at the rocket fuel plant aaaaaand don’t worry guys, no fire anymore, the fuel has launched itself so high into the sky that it is no longer a danger to anyone other than airplanes’
Look up the pepcon disaster. Fire and explosion at rocket fuel plant
Scruffy's gonna die how he lived.
1:25 now there's 23 hours a day
How do you steal a comment and get more likes
0:45 - who want's a big scoop of solid rocket booster ice cream ?
Looks delicious
I just hope they didn't forget to put up no smoking signs
Haha
Me me me! I prefer hydrogen and methane doe
edwin hennum DOE
That igniter installation job.......oh boy........that seems stressful.
There is a pin in it that needs to be manually removed in order for it to work. Additionally, it needs an electrical signal of at least 20 volts to fire it. It would be exceptionally difficult to unintentionally activate one. So I doubt it would be stressful, given the relative difficulty of accidentally triggering it.
Might want to double check your antistatic strap
@@PeterPaoliello Take every reasonable safety precaution.
@@PeterPaoliello you know there are shoes that ground you? might wanna double check before you talk useless shit :)
@@chriseffpunkt4333 you know that jokes are made to be funny and not scientifically accurate? Might wanna double check your level of humor before talking useless shit
I hate to say this, but I don't think you're going to launch in 2020
Bold guess
Most likely 2021...
Most likely never... they’ll just keep collecting the funding from the government while a private company with no government funding takes over
@@dyllonmalone5617 private? Yup. No government funding? No :)
@@NoName-zg2te well said. Many private companies wouldn’t exist without NASA’s backing
A highly unforeseen event happened when Ed inadvertently, and probably out of pure distraction, introduced the Innibitor into the igniter tube.
0:44 thats the real astronaut ice cream.
Really cool to see. I was there for the QM-1 test (the motor being built here) as a social media rep for NASA. On day 1 we got a full facility tour and I was amazed at the safety precautions taken, rightfully so. Still have my Orbital ATK hat! :-)
1:23 is it over? (Music stops) hm time to change vid (A BIG BOOM AND A ROCKET ENGINE) HOLY SHIT!
Who's watching after 5 years😁😁😁
I'm watching how humans looked like in 21st century... I'm watching this video in year 4130...
Found "RUclips" and this video in something called a "smartphone" i think which has been kept in a box for more than 2 thousands years.. This box I've got from my ancestors also contains "pictures of my ancestors (and also other humans), this phone with some applications installed like youtube and things...
So I'm watching this video after 2115 years! And in my days we invented time travel... Simple as going 2times the speed of light through mediums and loophole...
So i came from the year 2130 n the time travel last only for about 1mins and 59sec, just have the time to watch this video and write this comments and I'll be gone! And if i wanna come back it will cost me only $1Trillion.. I mean 999Billions994millions927thousands990hundreds99! This is not so much like time travel is really cheap!
Spoiler : our cats and dogs can talk human language and has wings to. Fly too, most of them are robots. We still dont have flying cars as our president which is also a robot classified flying car as lame and ugly.
We can enlarge the penis to any length and girth desire! Women can be stay virgin for as long as they want even if they have sex 5 times a day which is optional ( women needs to have sex at least
3times a day which is compulsory) just by taking some prescribed pills... If a woman cheats, we converts her into a robot which shall then be a slave to its owner. If men cheats their penis shortens by 7cm every time he cheats and shall wait 1 year to grow back his penis and shall pay a fine of $7Trillions... And only after that that he will be able to enlarge to his desire size... If he continues to cheat the court will punish him by removing his penis and giving him a vagina... If anyone wanna cheats, they need to buy a premium citizen membership and pays $15trillions every 3 to 6mnths depending on the membership...
-The punishment for rape is " they cut the rapist penis and boil it in front of them and make them eat it live, and they shall get anal fuxked by a really big dick [length : 1meter to 2½Meter, Girth 20 to 40cm](depending on the gravity of the case) all day, every single day till their sentence is over. That's probably why the cases are really rare!
I mean that's why you should do LSD and shrooms and blue magic n heroine and top it up with some synthetic weed!
me
Not me
A lot of time, work and patience goes into not just the booster, but rocket too.
I didn't know those things were that massive!
Rockets are a lot bigger than you think!
They're fucking uge! As Trump would say lol
12 foot diameter if I remember correctly
@@vampov thanks for the reply
I stood by the nozzle. It was huge.
How to make most powerfull rocket motor ever flown:
This is how we end leap years.
Beautiful work !
1:25 looks like me after taco hell 😬
Lmfao
@Walter B it's sooooo yummy in my tummy
*Flame exists at mach 3*
So will these be in the firework stands in time for the 4th?
Nice to see the guts of the SRB.
Good job
I like no one is smoking here , definitely here smoking kills
scott manley brought me here
These are no where near the most powerful boosters ever made. The AJ260 was by far the most powerful, at 24 mega-newtons of thrust, almost double what these are producing.
Also the upcoming starship from space-x is going to have a total trust of 65mega-newtons
@@marinkovachev4694 no its not
@@dgafbrapman688 you are right
i just cheked the true amount of trust the Super Heavy booster will have and that is 72 Mega newtons. Here's a link to a wikipedia page for proof en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Starship
@@marinkovachev4694 im saying, its easy to say to say something, alot harder to deliver, especially for spacex. Its not that i thought u were wrong, i just doubt spacex's capability. A rocket company not even 20 years old is going to make the most powerful rocket stage ever developed? Fat chance.
@@dgafbrapman688 correct me if I am wrong but isn’t this less than 20 year old rocket company the same one that created the first ever reusable rocket and changed the rocket industry for ever.
As space-x has shown us already it is capable of doing things never done before using methods no one has ever thought of.
1:24 You can see the GoPro camera that's in another video that took a while to melt getting the shot of this actual test. GoPro films QM1 rocket smoke ring b4 melting.
ruclips.net/video/XybLjSUYgII/видео.html
that's why the earth is moving to Pluto
0:45 - Chocolate ice cream.
That thing is better than 95% of the stuff I make.
Awesome to work there.
how was that fastened to the test pad
velcro
Tightly.
Flex tape
5 YEARS AGO LOL.
SpaceX is the new king of space launches.
Had Rockey and Bullwinkle been able to keep Upsidaisium a secret, we could be farther ahead in the space race.
How many degrees in celcius that exhaust core.?
0:44 - Forbidden ice cream.
Simply amazing
What is the propellant they use? Isn't it aluminum powder or something, what else is in it?
Google "ammonium perchlorate composite propellant"
@@josephastier7421 yeah thanks mate
So this is where Scott Manley found video for his srb explanantion
Indeed. I had seen this video before. I remembered the imagery from way back. It just happened to pop up in my suggestions today lol.
a single spackle = 💥
And it's almost 2021 already...
I can't for the life of me understand why these things didn't break the whole stack apart with shock when they were used on shuttle launches. I mean that's a huge explosion when they ignite.
I heard in the Netflix Challenger documentary by someone who was present at a test say it was like a mini earthquake when those things go off.
Just for pure curiosity purposes, what is the degree temperature of the exhaust gas leaving the rocket engine?
I've always been dying to know how brutally hot that stuff is.
Should be about 10 to 15k C°
@@janav5624 damn!!
TY!
@@bovax6259 wait you replied after a year of your comment Man ! I wasn't hoping this thanks ☺️
@janav5624 Your comment came up on my RUclips notifications that you'd posted a reply. I'd forgotten about my posting, but RUclips hadn't until your reply.
In all my RUclips watching of nasa stuff or the Scott Manly channel who does space and rocket stuff, no one talks about how hot rocket gas is, and I've always wanted to know.
Finally, Ive got a rough approximation from you and it deserved a TY! 👍🤘
I NERD out over weird shit like that. 😁
I wonder if the full length version is out on Betamax yet?
Blimey!!! And here I'm lookin for a match to start my rizzla
Silver is one of the most useful metals. They prevent rusting. Ever silver metal plates are a mix of iron and a drop of silver. They give such a shine and good sheild for radiation. But exactly how they work is a mystery. But most abundant.
Why is it melted down, instead of just putting the powder in?
I believe it's because it's aluminum
It is not melted down at all. It is a thick dough like material when all of the ingredients are mixed that then cures after a curative is added and mixed in. Like adding hardener to the resin of an epoxy. It then forms a hard rubber like material after it is cured.
Composição do combustível?
Until space travel is more than using big firecrackers, we are really going to go nowhere…
Ehh, we have already explored the entire solar system, using nothing but "big firecrackers"...
Sent out interstellar probes, using nothing but "big firecrackers"...
And landed humans on the Moon, using nothing but "big firecrackers"...
What are you babbling about?
"Thedolt" is an apt moniker...
@@codymoe4986 can you say light years? I thought not… Love you guys.
What is the music in the video I love it
Helicopter veiw(main mix)
What music? I just heard boring, rhythmic noise. But I guess you're actually being ironic (at least I hope so).
Somehow I have a feeling that SpaceX isn't impressed...
You wouldn’t want to accidentally make a static electricity spark 😬
causing earth rotation to stop
No.
hi 7 Y A...
'
nope...
earth is the strong turnning rotatry than rocket
I used to look up to NASA. Then I watched as SpaceX steamrolled over them and I began to wonder... what was NASA doing with the billions of dollars of taxpayer dollars.
They are paying spacex in form of development contracts. They are planing a moon base. They are operating the space station....... aso
😉
SpaceX wouldn't exist without taxpayer money. So they're the same thing with less accountability and oversight.
@@peterLoO100 the question is more about things like:
Spacex: 2003/2005/2011(thoughts/concept/official plan) --> 2018(first flight)
Cost: wikipedia says "more than $500milion" let we even assume, that was $1Bilion for development, manufacturing and flight.
NASA: ULA SLS 2011(official plan) --> today(still in development, flights moved in time like premiere of cyberpunk 2077)
Cost: $18B (2011-2020) and it will be more
MORE FOOTAGE
that fuel looks yummy
That's quite the firework, lol
Explosive cement
How can members of the public view the rocket testing?
Stand there and watch.
Boeing: not today bucko *screws up the sls rs engines*
And all of this is just thrown away just after one use
jea and also tose wonderful rs-25 engines
That makes no sense
0:43 Forbidden pudding
I work for DRDO INDIA, I am looking for job change.....
Add a public comment...
Sucks we spent over 15 billion on sls and it’s reusing parts from the shuttle and old technology… I’m all for investing in space but it’s be nice if we actually got something for it
Eh, you mean a machine, capable of sending humans back to the Moon?
The exact thing that SLS and Orion proved on Artemis 1?
They only thing we're waiting on is that colossal boondoggle that is Starship...
Wonder where they go for a cigarette break😁
Crazy!
I guess there is a no smoking rule in place🤔😂
HEY!!! NASA SHOULD TRY GOING TO THE MOON FOR REAL THIS TIME.
LOL Earth slows-down/speeds-up by 1 second.
'
wow big rocket booster...
cannot going to mars...
only out to the sky from the earth ground
I’m sorry but I thought that guy in the thumbnail was going to get blasted
Same lol
I wouldn't trust NASA to launch a bottle rocket
Bill I don't think you have to worry about being called up!
@@SMHman666 nobody asked you. Shut up and read the comment.
Me after eating chicken vindaloo
What is the fuel made of?
Aluminum powder fuel, perchlorate oxidiser, and epoxy rubber binder. The aluminum powder gives the silvery color
What ratio?
@@random3250 If you just want to make an APCP rocket motor you can just look up for "Cherry Limeade APCP" formulation. It was made by the MIT rocket team
@@random3250 "The propellant mixture in each SRB motor consists of an ammonium perchlorate (oxidizer, 69.6 percent by weight), aluminium (fuel, 16 percent), iron oxide (a catalyst, 0.4 percent), a polymer (a binder that holds the mixture together, 12.04 percent), and an epoxy curing agent (1.96 percent)."
Thank you
There's a difference between most powerful rocket ever made and ever flown
Think very carefully about what you just typed.
1:24 after chilli con carne
with this money spacex could go to mars 50x
With starship, even more
Worst case scenario would be sth like
$10B (some random source says, that elon said, it will be sth between 2 and 10 billion) for development and then he hopes that it will be sth like 2mln per launch (LEO i guess), so let we say, that it will go up to 20mln
up to 2020 cost of sls development was sth like 18bilions
So u have 8bilion difference which goes into launches xD
8bln/20mln= sth like 400 flights 😀
Source: Trust me dude.
0:29 asmr
Whats the ingredients?
Ammonium Perchlorate, Aluminum powder, and Polybutadiene Acrylonitrile epoxy binder, plus a few other proprietary additives.
@@TheExplosiveGuy thanks
Cinnamon, flour, eggs, sugar and a smattering of chutney.
Comments 200
Step back.
5 years later and this tech is already obsolete and outdated lol
How?
@@crippleddiego9226 Why build an expensive expendable one-time use booster when we now have cheap reusable rockets for a fraction of the price with a fraction of manufacturing time? And thats just with Falcon 9/Heavy. Once their Starship design becomes operational they can carry 100 metric tonnes to orbit while being fully reusable (1st & 2nd stage). Space X plans to manufacture 1 Starship every 2 weeks. Shit will be cray cray :D
@@omfgstfuandgtfo simple. They supply a lot of thrust. Also, they don’t have to be fully expendable. Even though the space shuttle program did a bad job with it, I think that SRBs could at the least be partially reusable. They could be picked up by a helicopter like RocketLab plans to recover their Electron rockets. Reusability cuts costs. If SRBs could do that I don’t think they would be hellishly expensive like they are right now.
@@omfgstfuandgtfo Bruh, boosters are used several times, where did you get that idea from?
1:10 The ladies hair? Nobody sees that?
The propellant of solid rocket booster looks like baumkuchen.😋
Hate to tell ya but you gotta make it to the moon first
Something, something about this comment, not aging well?
I wonder if you had enough of them lined up you could speed up or slow down the rotation of the earth? 🤭
No..
Yes. In the sense that Archimedes said "Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world." The logistics however wouldn't
Your problem is that the exhaust isn't anywhere near escape velocity, meaning any torque on the planet is countered somewhere down the line as the exhaust slows down/falls back down.
So unfortunately, it can't. Neither could you push the earth this way. For that you need a rocket with an exhaust velocity exceeding 11km/s (vs this booster's ~3km/s)
@Walter B It's not actually about thrust or power, but about how fast your exhaust gases are relative to the back of your rocket. The amount of momentum applied to earth is actually your total momentum MINUS the momentum lost due to gravity (MfVf = Mi(Ve-11.2km/s) )
You can have the most powerful rocket in the world but it won't matter if the exhaust falls back to earth. Conversely, even a tiny electrical thruster can slowly change earth's orbit if its exhaust is fast enough.
Really I'm not a rocket scientist bit what if they were lined up around the planet and set off at the right time.
Send more money to Mars, everything’s just fine down here.
Vous avez entièrement raison 👌
😆 🤣 😂
If you want to wait until everything is fine down here, space exploration will never happen. We're already benefiting from space exploration now and will continue to benefit exponentially. In the not too distant future, we will be protecting the earth from asteroid impacts. That's a huge goal and it will not wait for everything to be cool down here. No one is going to stop it. Arguments about war and famine and poverty and anything else political carry no weight as far as space exploration is concerned. Given that you object to the money spent on exploration, can I assume that you know that the amount spent on it pales in comparison to so-called defense spending and that you're okay with that? Why don't you target the money spent on aggression down here? Leave those that want a bright future alone. I believe that anyone making the "don't spend on space while people suffer" argument are myopic in the mind's eye.
@@AnotherGlenn You’re certainly entitled to your opinion “benefit exponentially” perhaps further expenditures should be further justified and then voted on.
@@craigewing3054 We are all entitled to our opinions. You didn't answer the question about so-called defense spending. Just keep ignoring the fact that you're okay with a gigantic military expenditure and a tiny space exploration expenditure. Your position is untenable. I hope other people can see this.
take a smoke
A step on the way to Mars? Disposable solid state rockets are not the way to mars. Reusable Reusable Reusable
А состав интересен... 🤔😉
Hey! I just thought of a new way to execute our prisoners. Put them all behind that SLS booster during the next test or launch!
Specially child molesters...
@@dirtyharry1844 nah, too quick.
@@dirtyharry1844
adrenochrome child traffickers
That would vaporize prisoners once the booster is ignited or before those they would choke to death from the smell of those powders
I don't think NASA is going to be doing much other than observing, providing communications, and telemetry.....they certainly have lost their edge.
What's the carbon footprint?
Who cares
Like a yeti
It burns aluminum with ammonium perchlorate (yikes!) with epoxy rubber binder and iron catalyst.
The rubber will likely vaporize, and you get some nasty stuff from the perchlorate.
@El Fo That is for liquid oxygen - hydrogen rockets, this is a solid rocket.
@El Fo technically correct for the oxygen. In this case its ammonium perchlorate though the fuel is aluminum.
Lovedu mere data se rilitet vedio contac profil statas aur pic dikhana band kar vishal corner ke tower se aur dsp center se
1:24 me after taco bell
Nobody:
Will it fit in my Honda?
Hold my beer
Am I a joke to you?
Asking for a friend
Everybody gangsta
End this man’s whole career
He protecc, he attacc …
Sexual/genitalia innuendo
Scatological/potty joke
Question of quantity answered yes
Plot twist
Left/entered the chat
Gaming reference
Dislikes are from
I’m a simple man
Not gonna lie
Last time I was this early
Legend has it
That’ll buff right out
Fun fact
(X) be like
(X) intensifies
(X) wants to know your location
YT algorithm counting down years
Who’s watching in current year?
So you've chosen death?
Punch line below read more
A rocket has, and will again go again to Mars. Nobody will ever be on it. The billionaire is taking us for a ride, but you, or your grandchildren are not going, and that is a good thing.
The ozone layer says that you shouldnt use it
No it doesn't lol. None of the byproducts of these boosters cause ozone depletion.
@@TheExplosiveGuy actually yes but it depends on which guel you use, the fuel containkng clorine does, since ozone is 3ox combined and therefore unstable, it eould when the solid fuel burns, it will create an exaust containing, co2, h2o and clorine
@@TheExplosiveGuy but indeed *these* rocket boosters are safe, but still dirty compared to the liquid, but hey, they provide alot of thrust
SLS needs to go away. It's a zombie of the worst space flight program ever (the Shuttle).
This is how pollution ... You know😄😄
Not only usa but all countries
Lol expendable
Overbudget and outdated even before it launches. I don’t see anything to get exited about
Honestly, I don't think you can really complain about SLS being over budget when it's just a drop in the water compared to military projects.
V7 Videos Well it’s a huge piece of NASA’s budget and highlights chronic problems with the way NASA contractors operate, which is always go overbudget and never finish anything on schedule
@@harbl2479 to be fair, every big project goes over budget and overtime nowadays, at least where I live
Write the senator, or even better, phone him, tell him what you think is the best for the state, and how to spend your tax. Now that would be exiting!
Harbl nasa’s budget is fucking tiny. They are gonna go over budget a lot and they are forced to use old shit and can’t innovate. So how bout you try doing something about(even though there is literally nothing anyone can do about it).