Excuse me, sir. I have some confusion: When the rubber rod is rubbed with fur, the rubber rod is negatively charged, right? (Because different materials rub against each other: the nuclei of different atoms have different attraction to electrons, and the rubber atoms attract the electrons of the fur atoms, so they are negatively charged) After the rubber rod touches the electroscope, the angle of the electroscope becomes larger, which means that the electrons are transferred from the rubber rod to the metal ball of the electroscope, right? The attraction of metal atoms to electrons is not as strong as that of rubber atoms, right? The electrons that the rubber atoms have finally snatched from the fur are given to it by lightly touching the metal? This electroscope is negatively charged. When the uncharged rubber rod connects it to another uncharged electroscope, why does no reaction occur? Isn't there a lot of electrons in the negatively charged electroscope? Why doesn't the uncharged rubber snatch its electrons when it touches it (the electrons of the electroscope should be easier to snatch than the electrons of the fur? Many electrons in the electroscope are redundant and have no binding force, why doesn't the rubber rod accept these electrons?) Looking forward to your reply.
So if we have a dc source connected to a capacitor with a glass or ebonite inside its plates we can have a dc current through the glass or ebonite... 😅😅😅 The transfer of electrons from ebonite to the metal plate of elctroscope is not only due to the + charge of metal plate but also from the microfriction during the conduction.
The best explanation video ever ,clears all my doubt😊😊😊
Glad to hear that
So helpful to study. The visualisation made me easy to understand! Thank you so much, Sir ❤
Excuse me, sir. I have some confusion: When the rubber rod is rubbed with fur, the rubber rod is negatively charged, right? (Because different materials rub against each other: the nuclei of different atoms have different attraction to electrons, and the rubber atoms attract the electrons of the fur atoms, so they are negatively charged) After the rubber rod touches the electroscope, the angle of the electroscope becomes larger, which means that the electrons are transferred from the rubber rod to the metal ball of the electroscope, right? The attraction of metal atoms to electrons is not as strong as that of rubber atoms, right? The electrons that the rubber atoms have finally snatched from the fur are given to it by lightly touching the metal? This electroscope is negatively charged. When the uncharged rubber rod connects it to another uncharged electroscope, why does no reaction occur? Isn't there a lot of electrons in the negatively charged electroscope? Why doesn't the uncharged rubber snatch its electrons when it touches it (the electrons of the electroscope should be easier to snatch than the electrons of the fur? Many electrons in the electroscope are redundant and have no binding force, why doesn't the rubber rod accept these electrons?)
Looking forward to your reply.
So nice
awesome visualization
Welcome
Nice👍
Thank you Sir for this video. It helped me understand this activity more clearly. All my doubts are cleared through this video.
All the best
Superb
best explanation
Loved the demonstration❤ thank you❤
Wow thankyou so much
Most welcome 😊
Helped me beyond measure
Thanks a lot, Sir❤
Most welcome!
Thank you sm for the clear explanation sir!!
Glad to help
Thankyou very much, its really very helpful✨😊
You're welcome 😊
How can you know that this is a positive charge or negative charge
We just assume that one is positive and other is Negative
Your explanation is very nice
Thanks a lot
❤❤❤
Thank you for building my concept
Welcome
So if we have a dc source connected to a capacitor with a glass or ebonite inside its plates we can have a dc current through the glass or ebonite... 😅😅😅 The transfer of electrons from ebonite to the metal plate of elctroscope is not only due to the + charge of metal plate but also from the microfriction during the conduction.