Another big thing to note is that the new Sequoia went back to a solid rear axel when the past generation was independent suspension, the Tahoe is running an independent rear suspension. Both are great looking SUVs. If you are going to off road more often the Sequoia would be the better choice for the rear locker and articulation of the solid axel, if you would like a smoother ride and occasionally need 4WD then the Tahoe is great too.
@@MarkrrO Toyota has always been known for their reliability but for these new turbo hybrid engines it might be too soon to say. However, I would give them the benefit of the doubt for their reputation. Chevy is decent but i have heard some horror stories of lifter failures. I own a 03 sequoia which has been amazing and a 21 chevy trail boss, thankfully no issues with the chevy so far.
Hey man, I was there yesterday. Saw the new Sequoia for the first time. Third row situation was a real disappointment, especially when seeing in person. Most people seemed to have the same reaction.
I'll wait for the next gen 4runner as my wife loves my 5th gen to death. This was a woman forever attached to her little sports cars and now wants the TRD Pro route.
Just picked up the Capstone. I will say that the cargo space is limited and awkward. The board it comes with is a little flexible. Makes you wonder how much you can rest on it. The room in the 3rd row is much better than everyone is saying. I am 6'2 and just fine in the back. Don't let that be a concern. The AC system is only adequate though-a real bummer. The heated and vented seats also in the second row are nice, but don't think your back-side is going to be ice cold in the summer, it will cool down slightly. Comfort is very nice. I would say for under 100,000 its worth it. Just always remember that it is a Toyota and the reliability is going to help you sleep at night.
I believe the reason the seat organs are exposed in the 2nd row of the Tahoe is because the second row slides while the Sequoia’s does not. I think it’s kind of nice that you can option out the Tahoe vs HAVING to get everything on the Sequoia forcing you into a 10 grand upgrade if you want to go off-road! Both nice trucks! Only way to know if they are off road or better than eachother is to take them there! Can’t wait to see a real off-road head-to-head on these two. Also, does the Sequoia have a manual locking diff? The z71 has a mechanical I believe? Although too bad it doesn’t take the electronic locking diff out of the at4 Yukon! Overall I think the Tahoe looks ALOT nicer for daily use! I think it could probably stand up to the TRD off-road too!
Our family was going to order one of trd pros but after having so many issues with our 22 hybrid Sienna we chose the new Yukon Denali. Here in Canada the Yukon was $97 k. At least we got $10k more than we paid for it on trade.
Hands down Sequoia for most of the obvious reasons people buy Toyota's for. But the main thing is I would like my $80000 vehicle to be worth More than 60k the moment I drive off the lot lol. GM depreciate wayyyyyyy too much. Yota goes up in value often times. Oh and it's a way better off roader
Having driven both, I think the Tahoe is the better all around SUV with significantly more cargo space and a nicer interior. That being said (and since the final call would rest with Mrs JAX), we no longer need all the space we once did. But for what the TRD Pro costs (and is marked up to) you can get magna ride and air springs on the Tahoe, which gives it a pretty fantastic ride. Reliability? Well, it’s a wash for me since the Toyota powertrain is new. I think the jury is still out for both gens on that.
Im a huge Toyota fan and Im sure it will be a solid, reliable SUV (own an 08 with 200K trouble free miles on it) but I must admit I like the Tahoe for its looks, interior comfort, space, quieter cabin, 0:02 and ride far more than I do the the Sequoia. To me the third row, lack of cargo space, and that shelving system marketed as “flexible” (lets call BS when we see or smell it) is a no starter for me. Clearly if you want to more serious off roading the sequoia would serve your needs better but for 98% of owners, both would serve their mild off roading needs. It will be interesting to see 2024 refreshed interior of the Tahoe.
I think the Sequoia would be a more reliable vehicle in the long run. Chevy is known for mechanical issues. But my neighbor got a new Tahoe last year and he's really happy with it.
If off-road capability was my main goal, I would pick Sequoia. For everything else though, I like the Tahoe. The Toyota just looks odd inside, the GM has a much nicer interior. Also, for what is essentially an appearance package, Tahoe comes with some pretty legit recovery points. It's a shame Toyota can't be bothered to do these.
This is a great comparison. Thank you for showing us this, Jon. Question in general, the Tahoe appears to "trick" you into thinking the seats fold flat, since the cargo area is much higher already. It this just my impression? The third row doesn't seem to fold any lower than they already are. So, it seems as though the Sequoia has a lower cargo area, and the shelf provides you with a level area, matching the third row. Plus, as you said, the area underneath the second row is much cleaner on the Sequoia.
I have to agree with some of the other comments here JON, neither, way to over priced, both look great and both have nice features, but (realistically) it's not worth the investment at that price point. My personal views. Great run down on both, thanks. :)
You walk between the 2 back captains chairs to get to the 3rd row in the Tahoe. You don't have to try to fit like in the Toyota. Also, why didn't you go over the fact that the Tahoe had the touch screens for the back passengers? But for off road I'd pick the Toyota. For everything else the Tahoe.
TRD Jon, I have that Tahoe. The air suspension is really nice. It gives it at ~ 2 inch lift. On the Highway you are at the same height of semis or lifted trucks. It comes down when you exit. On 4 low it goes up another inch. Gas mpg is worse than advertised, but it appears that’s the same case with the Tundra/Sequoia. I’m averaging 13 city 16.5 hwy 14 combined on regular. To me the part time 4x4 is a deal breaker for the Toyota.
oh i was here today at DC auto Show :) did a TRD PRO test drive and found that ride was pretty stiff which i did not like and also did not like the V8 Fake noise in the cabin .
Wish Toyota would offer a non-hybrid version with a true fold-flat cargo area. The current cargo arrangement is a deal-breaker. No way I’m buying a Chevy though. Hopefully Toyota comes up with a better solution in a future refresh. Until then, I’ll keep my 4Runner.
Both are nice but the issue is the no ground clearance independent rear suspension on the Tahoe. Driving behind the new Tahoe, you can see the rock knocking lower rear suspension arms. I would personally have the solid rear axle on a true 4x4.
You are so RIGHT, this current gen Tahoe/Suburban was almost perfect, but they RUIN it for me with the Low Rear-Axle Ground Clearance. And it's interesting how Toyota actually went the opposite direction with this new Gen, its as Solid Rear Axle, while the previous Gen have the Independent Rear Suspension, which was still better than the Current Tahoe's. But But, the Tahoe may not be that bad because I heard that the Suspension height is adjustable from a push of a button, so maybe that solve the problem.
Springs and solid rear axle is better (especially off the road). Air springs are cooler to show big lift - but in real world in highest setting is stiff and no articulation, electronics needs to do a lot to compensate it. These 3rd seats battery need some space. I would but Sequoia. I love the hybrid toyota's powertrains.
The Sequoia you want, will be 90k. It’s Toyotas way of selling the LC to a broader American public. I’ve owned a Tacoma for 12 years. Traded it in for a Tahoe.
Battle of the base models is an interesting topic but I'm definitely interested about what the comps are for the AT4 and TRDPro models. I'd take the base model sequoia but it's hard for me to see myself taking a trdpro over the AT4's
toyota or chevy its like nike, or vans, we are all brand loyal , the 3rd row in the sequoia, take's up to much cargo space , we need cargo space, payload , room for our overlanding kit. as we have no need, want or will ever have a use for a 3rd row ....do like the looks of the new sequoia solid rear
Great video and nice comparison. If Toyota did their R&D, then the Sequoia would out last the Tahoe, and for that, I would pick the Sequoia. Chevy just not as good as they used to be.
For me, id much rather pick the Sequoia for sure. Im a bit picky with interior look wise, not so much exterior cause youre spending more inside. The Tahoes interior looks a bit older style and the colour isnt my type. Couldve just went with black colour than that brownish grey, its a bit too boring.
Sequoia is better in multiple ways but that rear storage is a problem. They could offer a two row hybrid and flatten the back or they could go LX600 style and get rid of the hybrid.
The Sequoia is great but if you don't like to be noticed while you're driving I don't think the Sequoia TRD PRO would be a good idea. A friend of mine has a white one with the red interior and everytime I am with him in it people are staring, looking and trying to ask him questions about it.
How about a Toyota Dealer that ISN'T DOING MARKET ADJUSTMENT!!! I've spoken to probably 5 dealers ALL doing 10k-15k above MSRP.... Dear Toyota I'm driving a 07 Tundra (have a HIghlander for my wife) with 300K miles LOVE the truck but your dealers are about to drive me to another brand...... Your dealers are ruining your brand with the frustration of these absurd chargers... But then I also understand selling something at the price the market will pay... But this will not last forever but my memory and many other customers memory will
I don't mind waiting because of inventory or being on a list...But being on a wait list and being expected to pay a "Market Adjustment" of 10K-15k is just not happening for me..... Never mind when you try and reach out for inventory they either don't respond or don't answer the question of "Do You Apply A Market Adjustment " ....Then they dance all around the question asking If I have a trade? That at this point has nothing to do with the question of "Market Adjustment" ... Purchasing a car has always been frustrating now it's just as frustrating just with different questions
If I wanted to spend $80k and just wanted something ready off the showroom floor then I'd say the Bronco Raptor? Or if you wanted something a bit more luxurious, the Defender? The prices these days are just mind-blowing.
@@terrynichol577 lmao, not buying either. Not spending $80k on any of these. Would rather build-out an old Land Cruiser or something with that kind of money
@@ColeMarkusen Good stuff. Land cruises are the shit. Myself. I have an 18 TRD off-road premium. I've been building it for the last year. No interest in getting away from natural aspirated 4.0 engine in there.
Lots of pros and cons. Bottom line neither vehicle will see any serious off-roading at those price points. I posted before and I am a fan of Toyota. I'd be hard pressed to give up my 18 4Runner, I mean really hard pressed. In this case I would go for the Chevy. One is for the fold flat storage and room in back, do not need 3rd row seating. Second big one at this point is that the Toyota is on an all new platform and has not stood the test of time, it just came out. I am seeing a lot of quality control issues with Toyota on various models that we have not seen in the past when new models come out. That concerns me. The Chevy looks better in my opinion, sleeker, not as box like. Seriously, neither will see situations where articulation is an issue. These are for families, vacations, towing the boat or travel trailer down dirt roads or snow situations. Biggest thing is that they are seriously overpriced and people will never use half of what is on them. Just not affordable for the average person or family. I've been off-loading since the late 60's early 70's and never had any of this new electronic controls and suspensions and did just fine with a little common sense. Okay maybe there were times I forgot common sense but had a hell of a time doing it! My old FJ was a tank. Okay they were a little too sparse back then, no AC, no power steering, no carpeting, heck no radio but the radio didn't matter once you got over 30 mph you couldn't hear anything or talk anyway. :)
Seems like the Tahoe z-71 is a big hit with the Mommies in the school drop-off line in our area 😂. So, buy a Tahoe for the Wife, so she can run with the herd, but buy a TRD-Pro for yourself for genuine off-road capability, reliability. & it’s just plain bad-ass looking. Tahoes are a dime a dozen
Yeah why not. Throw in a Porsche to race at the track just for your me days too. LOL,, Don't forget to purchase that 2nd Vacation home while you're at it.
Tahoes are a dime a dozen for a reason....just like 4Runners....because everyone likes them 😂😂😂....but I have yet to see a Sequoia TRD PRO on the road yet and I live in LA, the car capital of the country 🙄....there is a reason why the Tahoe and the 4Runner have not changed much over the years, they don't need to....people just keep buying the same old platform over and over...forever. Toyota and Chevy have definitely received high profits from both designs....decades of free flowing profits for both. This generation of Sequoia may or may not break even for the initial design costs...maybe it will be a loss for Toyota in the end....
Usually love Toyota but hard pass on this , they rushed it and the battery packs is so stupid how they raised all the seat to keep the cooling inside. Also the fit and finish is disappointing by a big mile. Im not a Chevy person but better then Toyota in this case.
Toyota built the vehicle that RUclips influencers wanted. Not what real drivers wanted. Must haves big fancy iPad due dad thing a ma giggies. Cameras every where because I can’t take my eyes of the imax screen in my vehicle or turn my head. Safety this safety that because I’m to busy watching my imax screen while driving down the road. Off-road vehicles with no clearance , street tires , low ground effects. $80000 price tag add another 5 to 10 to make off-road capable. Need to stop calling these off-road vehicles. Most buyers of these will come to off roading is if they accidentally drive on the grass backing out of driveway. Let’s just call this what it is an American status symbol. No where as good as 70 series Land Cruiser.
Chevys interior look like they have for years. Nothing new there. Toyota quality over Chevy any day. Reliability? Toyota? Resale value? Toyota! #NoContest
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
Another big thing to note is that the new Sequoia went back to a solid rear axel when the past generation was independent suspension, the Tahoe is running an independent rear suspension. Both are great looking SUVs. If you are going to off road more often the Sequoia would be the better choice for the rear locker and articulation of the solid axel, if you would like a smoother ride and occasionally need 4WD then the Tahoe is great too.
Great point!!
What about thr reliabilty which one you think is good?
@@MarkrrO Toyota has always been known for their reliability but for these new turbo hybrid engines it might be too soon to say. However, I would give them the benefit of the doubt for their reputation. Chevy is decent but i have heard some horror stories of lifter failures. I own a 03 sequoia which has been amazing and a 21 chevy trail boss, thankfully no issues with the chevy so far.
I am a Toyota guy but I'd go with the tried and true Chevy V8 and I liked the way the tahoe back seat lay flat to the vehicle
New Tahoe is junk. Lots of lifter issues.
@@h1tman-640
@@h1tman-640 wow didnt know that unreal for almost 80K
Chevys ecotech motors are junk
@@Jojo-ni2cg They were great trucks but they added in cylinder deactivation technology that is causing lifters to go in the engines.
I really don't think either is worth the price tag, but if I had to choose sequoia for me, Jon.
They are both nice but also WAYY OVER PRICED!!
I'll just stick with my 5th Gen 4runner 🤙❤️
Your baby Sequoia... lol
@Gabriel Alcantara haha funny guy, With the pink slip in hand and knowing I didn't over pay. Its all good, I'll take that any day 😂😉👍
Yeah fr like what middle-class person has enough money to pay off an 80K vehicle in 3 yrs
@@noahpickerill3749 those with 2-3 jobs 😂
If you had to buy just one, the Sequoia. If you had to choose which one to live with though, the Tahoe is the better vehicle for comfort in space.
Tahoe for me
Hey man, I was there yesterday. Saw the new Sequoia for the first time. Third row situation was a real disappointment, especially when seeing in person. Most people seemed to have the same reaction.
I'll wait for the next gen 4runner as my wife loves my 5th gen to death. This was a woman forever attached to her little sports cars and now wants the TRD Pro route.
Just picked up the Capstone. I will say that the cargo space is limited and awkward. The board it comes with is a little flexible. Makes you wonder how much you can rest on it. The room in the 3rd row is much better than everyone is saying. I am 6'2 and just fine in the back. Don't let that be a concern. The AC system is only adequate though-a real bummer. The heated and vented seats also in the second row are nice, but don't think your back-side is going to be ice cold in the summer, it will cool down slightly. Comfort is very nice. I would say for under 100,000 its worth it. Just always remember that it is a Toyota and the reliability is going to help you sleep at night.
Congrats on your Capstone!
@@TRDJon Thanks, it was more for my wife. Curious, we didn’t get the MTS or CC feature in this model. Can one/dealer install this after?
I believe the reason the seat organs are exposed in the 2nd row of the Tahoe is because the second row slides while the Sequoia’s does not.
I think it’s kind of nice that you can option out the Tahoe vs HAVING to get everything on the Sequoia forcing you into a 10 grand upgrade if you want to go off-road!
Both nice trucks! Only way to know if they are off road or better than eachother is to take them there! Can’t wait to see a real off-road head-to-head on these two.
Also, does the Sequoia have a manual locking diff? The z71 has a mechanical I believe? Although too bad it doesn’t take the electronic locking diff out of the at4 Yukon!
Overall I think the Tahoe looks ALOT nicer for daily use! I think it could probably stand up to the TRD off-road too!
Our family was going to order one of trd pros but after having so many issues with our 22 hybrid Sienna we chose the new Yukon Denali.
Here in Canada the Yukon was $97 k. At least we got $10k more than we paid for it on trade.
You’re gonna take a huge loss on the Tahoe
What issues did you have with your sienna? Curious bc I'm considering one.
I really want to know what Toyota has to say about the rear being such a screwup and whether theres a plan to do a redesign
Sticking with Toyota for me
Hands down Sequoia for most of the obvious reasons people buy Toyota's for. But the main thing is I would like my $80000 vehicle to be worth More than 60k the moment I drive off the lot lol. GM depreciate wayyyyyyy too much. Yota goes up in value often times. Oh and it's a way better off roader
No comparison for myself Toyota is way higher quality
Sequoia trd pro as soon as you go off the lot goes up 20k lol
Having driven both, I think the Tahoe is the better all around SUV with significantly more cargo space and a nicer interior. That being said (and since the final call would rest with Mrs JAX), we no longer need all the space we once did. But for what the TRD Pro costs (and is marked up to) you can get magna ride and air springs on the Tahoe, which gives it a pretty fantastic ride. Reliability? Well, it’s a wash for me since the Toyota powertrain is new. I think the jury is still out for both gens on that.
How is it better all around when the mileage sucks 😮
Im a huge Toyota fan and Im sure it will be a solid, reliable SUV (own an 08 with 200K trouble free miles on it) but I must admit I like the Tahoe for its looks, interior comfort, space, quieter cabin, 0:02 and ride far more than I do the the Sequoia. To me the third row, lack of cargo space, and that shelving system marketed as “flexible” (lets call BS when we see or smell it) is a no starter for me. Clearly if you want to more serious off roading the sequoia would serve your needs better but for 98% of owners, both would serve their mild off roading needs. It will be interesting to see 2024 refreshed interior of the Tahoe.
I think the Sequoia would be a more reliable vehicle in the long run. Chevy is known for mechanical issues. But my neighbor got a new Tahoe last year and he's really happy with it.
Idk the new Toyota V6 isn’t seeming to be that great either
If off-road capability was my main goal, I would pick Sequoia. For everything else though, I like the Tahoe. The Toyota just looks odd inside, the GM has a much nicer interior. Also, for what is essentially an appearance package, Tahoe comes with some pretty legit recovery points. It's a shame Toyota can't be bothered to do these.
Great job on the video Jon! Thanks for making it.
This is a great comparison. Thank you for showing us this, Jon. Question in general, the Tahoe appears to "trick" you into thinking the seats fold flat, since the cargo area is much higher already. It this just my impression? The third row doesn't seem to fold any lower than they already are. So, it seems as though the Sequoia has a lower cargo area, and the shelf provides you with a level area, matching the third row. Plus, as you said, the area underneath the second row is much cleaner on the Sequoia.
I have to agree with some of the other comments here JON, neither, way to over priced, both look great and both have nice features, but (realistically) it's not worth the investment at that price point. My personal views. Great run down on both, thanks. :)
You walk between the 2 back captains chairs to get to the 3rd row in the Tahoe. You don't have to try to fit like in the Toyota. Also, why didn't you go over the fact that the Tahoe had the touch screens for the back passengers?
But for off road I'd pick the Toyota. For everything else the Tahoe.
Makes sense with the smaller seats. And I believe that was part of the tech stuff I showed.
TRD Jon, I have that Tahoe. The air suspension is really nice. It gives it at ~ 2 inch lift. On the Highway you are at the same height of semis or lifted trucks. It comes down when you exit. On 4 low it goes up another inch. Gas mpg is worse than advertised, but it appears that’s the same case with the Tundra/Sequoia. I’m averaging 13 city 16.5 hwy 14 combined on regular. To me the part time 4x4 is a deal breaker for the Toyota.
oh i was here today at DC auto Show :) did a TRD PRO test drive and found that ride was pretty stiff which i did not like and also did not like the V8 Fake noise in the cabin .
Better quality, most reliable brand, better MPG, Better resale value... It's a no brainer. TOYOTA ALL DAY!!!
Wish Toyota would offer a non-hybrid version with a true fold-flat cargo area. The current cargo arrangement is a deal-breaker. No way I’m buying a Chevy though. Hopefully Toyota comes up with a better solution in a future refresh. Until then, I’ll keep my 4Runner.
Sequoia needs an extended model like a suburban. No room for a big family with luggage.
Both are nice but the issue is the no ground clearance independent rear suspension on the Tahoe. Driving behind the new Tahoe, you can see the rock knocking lower rear suspension arms. I would personally have the solid rear axle on a true 4x4.
You are so RIGHT, this current gen Tahoe/Suburban was almost perfect, but they RUIN it for me with the Low Rear-Axle Ground Clearance. And it's interesting how Toyota actually went the opposite direction with this new Gen, its as Solid Rear Axle, while the previous Gen have the Independent Rear Suspension, which was still better than the Current Tahoe's. But But, the Tahoe may not be that bad because I heard that the Suspension height is adjustable from a push of a button, so maybe that solve the problem.
Springs and solid rear axle is better (especially off the road). Air springs are cooler to show big lift - but in real world in highest setting is stiff and no articulation, electronics needs to do a lot to compensate it. These 3rd seats battery need some space. I would but Sequoia. I love the hybrid toyota's powertrains.
The Sequoia you want, will be 90k. It’s Toyotas way of selling the LC to a broader American public. I’ve owned a Tacoma for 12 years. Traded it in for a Tahoe.
Jon why dont they go all black on the TRD PRO headliners I hate the white headliner
Battle of the base models is an interesting topic but I'm definitely interested about what the comps are for the AT4 and TRDPro models.
I'd take the base model sequoia but it's hard for me to see myself taking a trdpro over the AT4's
Are you hearing anything on Trail Hunter Sequoia?
Nothing yet.
toyota or chevy its like nike, or vans, we are all brand loyal , the 3rd row in the sequoia, take's up to much cargo space , we need cargo space, payload , room for our overlanding kit. as we have no need, want or will ever have a use for a 3rd row ....do like the looks of the new sequoia solid rear
Great video and nice comparison. If Toyota did their R&D, then the Sequoia would out last the Tahoe, and for that, I would pick the Sequoia. Chevy just not as good as they used to be.
My 2023 Sequoia platinum has black headliner.
Jon, do you think we’ll ever see a 1794 Edition Sequoia?
TBH I hope. Especially since it is made at the same plant.
Yota all the way!
For me, id much rather pick the Sequoia for sure. Im a bit picky with interior look wise, not so much exterior cause youre spending more inside. The Tahoes interior looks a bit older style and the colour isnt my type. Couldve just went with black colour than that brownish grey, its a bit too boring.
Sequoia all the way 🎉
Any comparison around the TRD Pro vs Lexus LX?
Sequoia is better in multiple ways but that rear storage is a problem. They could offer a two row hybrid and flatten the back or they could go LX600 style and get rid of the hybrid.
Tahoe looks way better ‼️
Same. It looks more complete
Get Tahoe with the LM0 Duramax
I think a correct question is which one is reliable? Quick answer, the old fashioned V8.
The one with the known lifter issues???
Both should be priced lower, but the Sequoia tops the Tahoe. Long term and for offroad
The Sequoia is great but if you don't like to be noticed while you're driving I don't think the Sequoia TRD PRO would be a good idea. A friend of mine has a white one with the red interior and everytime I am with him in it people are staring, looking and trying to ask him questions about it.
How about a Toyota Dealer that ISN'T DOING MARKET ADJUSTMENT!!! I've spoken to probably 5 dealers ALL doing 10k-15k above MSRP.... Dear Toyota I'm driving a 07 Tundra (have a HIghlander for my wife) with 300K miles LOVE the truck but your dealers are about to drive me to another brand...... Your dealers are ruining your brand with the frustration of these absurd chargers... But then I also understand selling something at the price the market will pay... But this will not last forever but my memory and many other customers memory will
Same here in Phoenix.. it’s so lame. I have a 17 4runner, 18 Camry, and 20 Avalon. I’m about to trade the 4Runner for a yukon
Plenty around, there are at least 5 in Colorado that I know of. Book market the cheese balls adding markups, spread the word and never buy from them.
I don't mind waiting because of inventory or being on a list...But being on a wait list and being expected to pay a "Market Adjustment" of 10K-15k is just not happening for me..... Never mind when you try and reach out for inventory they either don't respond or don't answer the question of "Do You Apply A Market Adjustment " ....Then they dance all around the question asking If I have a trade? That at this point has nothing to do with the question of "Market Adjustment" ... Purchasing a car has always been frustrating now it's just as frustrating just with different questions
@@Brad901 exactly same here but unfortunately someone is paying it.
As much as I dig Toyota I would pick the Tahoe. I’ll take the V8 over a hybrid all day long.
Nice!
*peasant blockers* ❣😄❣
I’d pick the Rivian R1S at that price point :)
Sequoia for sure! I would not buy a Chevy even if it was half the price!! ✌️
Is there a perfect all around SUV out in the market?
80k plus mark up, BLOODY FUCKING HELL
If I wanted to spend $80k and just wanted something ready off the showroom floor then I'd say the Bronco Raptor? Or if you wanted something a bit more luxurious, the Defender?
The prices these days are just mind-blowing.
Yeah, but neither of those are Toyota so go ahead bud buy a piece of shit lol
@@terrynichol577 lmao, not buying either. Not spending $80k on any of these. Would rather build-out an old Land Cruiser or something with that kind of money
@@ColeMarkusen Good stuff. Land cruises are the shit. Myself. I have an 18 TRD off-road premium. I've been building it for the last year. No interest in getting away from natural aspirated 4.0 engine in there.
Sounds like your bitter and need to make more money
@@derrickmartinez2147 Nah, there are just better options out there for the money.
Really need you to drive both now. C/D still has the Tahoe as far superior to the Sequoia.
Neither, buy a “used” Lexus GX460!! Less expensive and v8…
Looks and is so old though for 60k plus
Jon is this you Telegramming here or an imposter, thanks.
No. I blocked that user
@@TRDJon Ok Thanks. :)
Obviously the nissan armada,and save 20k!
Black is just boring - red is way more fun!
The red pops!
Lots of pros and cons. Bottom line neither vehicle will see any serious off-roading at those price points. I posted before and I am a fan of Toyota. I'd be hard pressed to give up my 18 4Runner, I mean really hard pressed. In this case I would go for the Chevy. One is for the fold flat storage and room in back, do not need 3rd row seating. Second big one at this point is that the Toyota is on an all new platform and has not stood the test of time, it just came out. I am seeing a lot of quality control issues with Toyota on various models that we have not seen in the past when new models come out. That concerns me. The Chevy looks better in my opinion, sleeker, not as box like. Seriously, neither will see situations where articulation is an issue. These are for families, vacations, towing the boat or travel trailer down dirt roads or snow situations. Biggest thing is that they are seriously overpriced and people will never use half of what is on them. Just not affordable for the average person or family. I've been off-loading since the late 60's early 70's and never had any of this new electronic controls and suspensions and did just fine with a little common sense. Okay maybe there were times I forgot common sense but had a hell of a time doing it! My old FJ was a tank. Okay they were a little too sparse back then, no AC, no power steering, no carpeting, heck no radio but the radio didn't matter once you got over 30 mph you couldn't hear anything or talk anyway. :)
Seems like the Tahoe z-71 is a big hit with the Mommies in the school drop-off line in our area 😂. So, buy a Tahoe for the Wife, so she can run with the herd, but buy a TRD-Pro for yourself for genuine off-road capability, reliability. & it’s just plain bad-ass looking. Tahoes are a dime a dozen
Yeah why not. Throw in a Porsche to race at the track just for your me days too. LOL,, Don't forget to purchase that 2nd Vacation home while you're at it.
Tahoes are a dime a dozen for a reason....just like 4Runners....because everyone likes them 😂😂😂....but I have yet to see a Sequoia TRD PRO on the road yet and I live in LA, the car capital of the country 🙄....there is a reason why the Tahoe and the 4Runner have not changed much over the years, they don't need to....people just keep buying the same old platform over and over...forever. Toyota and Chevy have definitely received high profits from both designs....decades of free flowing profits for both. This generation of Sequoia may or may not break even for the initial design costs...maybe it will be a loss for Toyota in the end....
Auto start on the Tahoe is free for the life of the vehicle…. Come on Toyota…
Tahoe has rear entertainment screens. This is a huge miss for the Toyota. If I had young kids, that would be a no brainer.
Usually love Toyota but hard pass on this , they rushed it and the battery packs is so stupid how they raised all the seat to keep the cooling inside. Also the fit and finish is disappointing by a big mile. Im not a Chevy person but better then Toyota in this case.
GM interiors are always generations behind. The Tahoe exterior looks real good though. Just can't stand the interior.
Who is taking a 80k care offroad!!
Toyota built the vehicle that RUclips influencers wanted. Not what real drivers wanted. Must haves big fancy iPad due dad thing a ma giggies. Cameras every where because I can’t take my eyes of the imax screen in my vehicle or turn my head. Safety this safety that because I’m to busy watching my imax screen while driving down the road. Off-road vehicles with no clearance , street tires , low ground effects. $80000 price tag add another 5 to 10 to make off-road capable. Need to stop calling these off-road vehicles. Most buyers of these will come to off roading is if they accidentally drive on the grass backing out of driveway. Let’s just call this what it is an American status symbol. No where as good as 70 series Land Cruiser.
Toyota Sequoia baby looks better is better and will last for ever not a 5 year vehicle
Chevy V8 Toyota V6...
And?
None...I hope even very well-off people don't pay this much for one.
cannot handle red interior
Let’s be real here….people who buys sequoia trd pro are not going to take it off roading 😂
BIG EGO PRIDE $80K CAR! THAT'S ALL!
Chevys interior look like they have for years. Nothing new there. Toyota quality over Chevy any day. Reliability? Toyota? Resale value? Toyota! #NoContest
Grandma interior
What?
😂
@@drewkane8052 well which one are you talking about man? Definitely not the Toyota. That Chevy Looks like a piece of shit lol
@@terrynichol577 lol. Of course I’m taking about the Chevy. Other then the screens the interior is straight out of the 90’s
Dang I can’t wait to be a grandma then.
Chevy looks like junk in comparison the choice is obvious for me