Class 26: Lyapunov Stability

[@hiramrayotorres2030]

Very nice explanation. There is nothing better to understand somehow abstract concepts than to visualize them. Congratulations.

[@LydellAaron]

Lyapunov videos have been showing up in my feed. Thank you for your explanation.

[@Neapoleone-Buonaparte]

Justin has done amazingly well. What a clear Western voice and well-spoken too!

[@shaheedvh3732]

Very brief and I like that accent .

[@benjamindeworsop8348]

Best explanation i've seen. Thank you!

[@SangramNiramale]

Neat and clear explanation. Thank you for this video.

[@TheHamoodz]

Beautiful explanation!

[@mohammadumair7778]

Nicely explained... kudos!

[@maverickreynolds]

Thank you for this video!

[@hjuanguilherme106]

Very good explanation

[@milesyoung7548]

At 9:38 condition (1) should be V(x*) = 0 right?

[@justinruths9590]

Yep - in this case we've take x*=0, but in general, yes, everything "centers" on x*.

[@electronicsandprogramming9794]

at 2:36 isn't any value of x and v = 0 an equilibrium?

[@pamulyadav4275]

my thoughts exactly, if v = 0, then x can be any constant value.

[@اممحمد-ق2ه]

Hello, can you help me please, I am working on bifurcations and solving a system of 3 equations with 6 variables and solving them using a Local Method of Lyapunov - Schmidt, I need some help please

[@mertozden94]

Thanks for the video. CHE580'den selamlar.

[@siuuomi]

Mert Özden aleykümselam kardesim allah zihin acikligi versin

[@osamaawad6947]

V. Good explanation.

[@eozineable]

Thanks

[@gauffreb4529]

I have a problem with your explanation at 4:40 ; If E(t) >= 0 and the derivate is negative, then it only means that E(t) converge to a positive number - not to 0
Then i think I missed a point somewhere ?

[@brendawilliams8062]

Thankyou