The fact the commentary said it was a robbery was mega unprofessional. Every time Taylor landed they were quiet as hell it was only when Serrano landed that they made noise.
Robbed again by a clumbsy , fumbling , cheap fighter. Katie Taylor is extremely embarrassing to watch , her foot work is very bad she always looks sloppy . Serrano is a savage , Katie could never fight with a cut like that . Serrano legacy will always be bigger than any others when it comes to ❤️ 💯 facts
@@boxingislife471Nobody gives a fuck that its unproffesional, its the TRUTH. She lead with her head in every supposed "clinch" and would rub on the cut to open it and she got completly outlanded, she should be ashamed along with anyone that cant see whats right infront of them
The commentators were cheering for Amanda and Only commenting her shots ignoring completely what Katie was landing. Complete disrespect so they lead people to think that it was robbed but Taylor deserves her victory and Amanda was a warrior. Thatvwas the fight of the night.
Mauro Ranallo and Rosie Perez just bounced off each other until what they were saying bore little to no resemblance to what was happening in the ring. If Netflix are going to appeal to a global audience they need a non-American commentator in there.
@maickamazigh812 I absolutely 100% agree with you. This is totally biased commentary. They commented on the Taylor vs. Serrano fight 1 as "iconic," my word and then said Taylor vs. Serrano 2 is another brilliant fight between 2 of the best ladies in boxing. Then they decided that Taylor's dirty tactics robbed Serrano of this fight. Katie Taylor deserved the win, no question. She won by using her tactical brain her experience in digging deep and her never give up attitude. Sore losers. They need to listen to Katie when she previously lost her fight In Dublin. No excuses no waffles. What an ambassador of boxing, What a lady What class. 🥊🥊🥊
Oh so its ok to be averaging headbutts every round now? Its clear as day how they were all intentional with how aimed most of them were, you should be ashamed for supporting something so blatantly dirty
Fair play to clarissa , I'll have to watch it again, but all this robbery talk is garbage . Roy Jones was the only sensible commentator. Very close fight again .
the girl, was like a bull charging with her head. That's foul. I respected Amanda more and felt she won. I wanted Amanda to protect her head more she let her get in and keep ramming.
No, aperently, she doesn't know what she is talking about. Amanda was the aggressor, and Serrano hurt Katie on more than one occasion. If by defense, she ment the ram stile defense, which it did not look accidental,l what made it worse was that katies head butting got worse it.
@andrewdevitt9380 How many more keyboard warriors are full of it, Cut the bull, surely you watched other contact sports. Cuts happen unfortunately for Amanda Serrano but if the tables were turned what would your opinion be then. The ref removed a point from Katie Taylor. Your comment suggests if Amanda Serrano won the fight the judges would be elevated to God-like level which using your words is moronic. Open your eyes all great fights are close and this was such a fight. Take off your rose-tinted glasses and look again. Have a good day..
2 часа назад
Even if they were partially intentional - she did it subtlety enough that it wasn't clear. I only saw the first 2 clash of heads, and both moved their heads into it. It's all part of the game. What your doing is similar to crying about being roughed up in Football/Soccer - yes it happens sometimes, but it's your job to either bait the free kick or to battle back. At the end of the day, whether it was intentional or not is regardless, because it's unprovable, highly debatable and Katie won.
According to Roy Jones junior the clash of heads was just that, a clash of heads so I think I will take the opinion of a ex world champion over a keyboard spider. 🙄
Really! Taylor fought with her head and continued to do so after the cut. The fight was amazing, but Serrano should of walked away the winner. According to Serrano and her team, this is what Taylor does. Cuts her opponents.
2 часа назад+4
[I'm not a huge Katie Taylor fan. I scored the first fight and had Sorano winning!] *But can someone explain to me how they think Katie lost this fight? Because I didn't score it but here's how I remember it:* *1. Firstly,* Katie struggled in the first 4 rounds. *2.* There was a legal clash of heads by both parties twice in round 4, which cut Sorano. *3.* After this, Katie's really started letting her hands go *(targeting the eye with check left hooks),* and at the end of EVERY she caused Sorano to bleed bad over her face. *4.* The cut made most of Katie's punches twice as effective. *5.* The Ref took a point of Katie - which I thought was stupid really. Leaning into your opponent and wanting to fight on the inside, should not be illegal. It is the obvious way to fight if you have a much shorter reach - and making this kinda inside work "illegal" is extremely unfair imo. *6. Overall,* Sorano might have the better punch stats - but Katie's light jab to Sorano's split eye was more damaging + effective than a power punch from Sorano on Katie. *7. Therefore,* Katie's aggression (while maybe not illustrated by the stats) was far more effective. You only needed to look at both of their faces after the fight - and you could see who had been battered. *8. To conclude, Katie CLEARLY won!!* *P.s. - Yes obviously headbutts are illegal and not scored - But,* the extra damage caused by punches after & due to the vulnerable area opened up the headbutt, is still scored. Thus, I am confused af as to how anyone can think that Sorano won that fight. Katie played the perfect Matador, baiting Sorano in, setting traps, targetting the cut, and if the fight continued how it was going - Sorano would've ended up blinded in one eye & KO'd.
I watched the whole fight live with no sound and thought serrano clearly won by a couple of rounds. It was a good fight and katie came on after a rough first couple of rounds, but i didnt listen to any commentary and thought serrano won. More aggressive, landed more and landed harder. Katie boxed well after the start but dont think it was enough
I don't know, commending her for aiming continuously for a head butt cut to gain the upper hand, is actually not good.... Taylor was definitely leading with her head a lot.
Y'all goofy as hell, if u don't think Katie was fighting dirty early. After the cut, she started working that area. 🧠. Before the cut, it was different.
That cut ruined the fight just like the first, two fights wasn't close tbh cos it's clear Amanda beat her in both fights. Katey is a dirty fighter and the refs was terrible cos Amanda complained several times during the fight and Katey should've been disqualified
Shields is so pooping herself over the idea that Amanda might be considered the gwoat that she'll say anything. Clearly Taylor won the bout by headbutt. Taylor is now the dirtiest female boxer in history, the headbutt queen of all times.
All the talking about amanda serrano getting robbed will not change the result of katie getting her hand raised congratulations on katie taylors win she's the goat no need for trilogy 😉
Rewatch that fight the head butts came after Amanda landed good shots on Taylor. Yeah it might hade been accidental causing the cut but the 3 times after that intentional
It isnt dirty tactics. Its another case of a southpaw causing accidental headbuts and an American who cant deal with losing to a non American. Katie was brilliant. Amanda did extremely well to go the distance but she is ruining it with the excuses and the sour grapes. I think the final score was extremely generous to serrano and she should be more magnanimous in defeat. She lacks class. The commentators were terrible too. No boxing experience and just cheering for the American. Katie would land combo after combo and all they would say is she looks tired. Serrano gets in a glancing blow and they are calling it a huge hit.
Katie learnt from the first fight Amanda fights dirty, head & elbows for 10 rnds. This fight Katie was smarter in the clinch kept her head down fought fire with fire, head to head. Amanda not so great lol
"Biggest shots" how? Maybe by force of the punch - but if you do the most powerful punch on someone's arm - it's not going to do much damage to them. Katie had the most damaging shots - because she targetted them to Sorano's eye. After round 4, *Sorano finished every round COVERED IN BLOOD!* If she was doing more damage with "bigger shots", shouldn't Katie have been bleeding too? Katie threw less powerful shots, and still do double the damage Sorano was doing - and Boxing is scored on "effective aggression" not "biggest/most shots landed".
The fight was so sad that Amanda could've really got hurt sense it started she was getting hit with the head and it was very clear the message, they didn't wanted her to win I won't watch boxing no more in my entire life dirty, dirty , dirty from all angles 😢
Finally someone talking sense. The commentary was a disgrace.
The fact the commentary said it was a robbery was mega unprofessional. Every time Taylor landed they were quiet as hell it was only when Serrano landed that they made noise.
Robbed again by a clumbsy , fumbling , cheap fighter. Katie Taylor is extremely embarrassing to watch , her foot work is very bad she always looks sloppy . Serrano is a savage , Katie could never fight with a cut like that . Serrano legacy will always be bigger than any others when it comes to ❤️ 💯 facts
❤
@@boxingislife471Nobody gives a fuck that its unproffesional, its the TRUTH. She lead with her head in every supposed "clinch" and would rub on the cut to open it and she got completly outlanded, she should be ashamed along with anyone that cant see whats right infront of them
@@nikko7507She's in her late thirties now and she fights everyone.
Watch without commentary and you'll get an unbiased real view of the fight.
Who’s dumb idea was it to have Rosie Perez commenting on fights
not sure if you knew, but she’s from Brooklyn, and Roy Jones jr loves BODY shots
I was asking that. Does Perez have a background/connection to boxing that I'm unaware of?
@@JamesMMcCann just a fan i believe
Very gracious of her. There’s a lot of viewers out there that don’t know how to judge a fight but have very strong opinions.
Once a fighter head buts multiple times I have no respect at all and the last fight as well 🤦🏻♂️
The commentators were cheering for Amanda and Only commenting her shots ignoring completely what Katie was landing. Complete disrespect so they lead people to think that it was robbed but Taylor deserves her victory and Amanda was a warrior. Thatvwas the fight of the night.
Mauro Ranallo and Rosie Perez just bounced off each other until what they were saying bore little to no resemblance to what was happening in the ring. If Netflix are going to appeal to a global audience they need a non-American commentator in there.
@maickamazigh812 I absolutely 100% agree with you. This is totally biased commentary. They commented on the Taylor vs. Serrano fight 1 as "iconic," my word and then said Taylor vs. Serrano 2 is another brilliant fight between 2 of the best ladies in boxing. Then they decided that Taylor's dirty tactics robbed Serrano of this fight. Katie Taylor deserved the win, no question. She won by using her tactical brain her experience in digging deep and her never give up attitude. Sore losers. They need to listen to Katie when she previously lost her fight In Dublin. No excuses no waffles. What an ambassador of boxing, What a lady What class. 🥊🥊🥊
It’s like DAZN initially, Netflix need to be more professional progressively
Bullshit, Amanda Got Robbed Again!😡
Oh so its ok to be averaging headbutts every round now?
Its clear as day how they were all intentional with how aimed most of them were, you should be ashamed for supporting something so blatantly dirty
Fair play to clarissa , I'll have to watch it again, but all this robbery talk is garbage . Roy Jones was the only sensible commentator. Very close fight again .
Totally agreed, the other two commentaries are bs
He was seriously biased himself will you stop.
@darraghsheehan9467 compared to Rosie and maurro you're having a laugh .
She knows what’s she’s talking about. Not keyboards warriors
and not you
Oh look we found a keyboard warrior@@bigvee401
Yeah right......
Imagine landing over 100 more punches while your opponent is deducted a point for dirty tactics and still lose by unanimous decision. What a disgrace.
the girl, was like a bull charging with her head. That's foul. I respected Amanda more and felt she won. I wanted Amanda to protect her head more she let her get in and keep ramming.
No, aperently, she doesn't know what she is talking about. Amanda was the aggressor, and Serrano hurt Katie on more than one occasion. If by defense, she ment the ram stile defense, which it did not look accidental,l what made it worse was that katies head butting got worse it.
A world champion legendary female boxer dosent know what she shes talking about but martinez on youtube does😂
Gold medalist,multiple division champ, multiple undisputed most decorated female boxer doesn't know what she's talking about? .....ok
Those headbutts were intentional,period. Katie knew exactly what ahe was doing, the ref and the judges were outright moronic.
@andrewdevitt9380 How many more keyboard warriors are full of it, Cut the bull, surely you watched other contact sports. Cuts happen unfortunately for Amanda Serrano but if the tables were turned what would your opinion be then. The ref removed a point from Katie Taylor. Your comment suggests if Amanda Serrano won the fight the judges would be elevated to God-like level which using your words is moronic. Open your eyes all great fights are close and this was such a fight. Take off your rose-tinted glasses and look again. Have a good day..
Even if they were partially intentional - she did it subtlety enough that it wasn't clear. I only saw the first 2 clash of heads, and both moved their heads into it. It's all part of the game. What your doing is similar to crying about being roughed up in Football/Soccer - yes it happens sometimes, but it's your job to either bait the free kick or to battle back. At the end of the day, whether it was intentional or not is regardless, because it's unprovable, highly debatable and Katie won.
According to Roy Jones junior the clash of heads was just that, a clash of heads so I think I will take the opinion of a ex world champion over a keyboard spider. 🙄
Everyone knows Clarissa cant stand amanda
Really! Taylor fought with her head and continued to do so after the cut. The fight was amazing, but Serrano should of walked away the winner. According to Serrano and her team, this is what Taylor does. Cuts her opponents.
[I'm not a huge Katie Taylor fan. I scored the first fight and had Sorano winning!]
*But can someone explain to me how they think Katie lost this fight? Because I didn't score it but here's how I remember it:*
*1. Firstly,* Katie struggled in the first 4 rounds.
*2.* There was a legal clash of heads by both parties twice in round 4, which cut Sorano.
*3.* After this, Katie's really started letting her hands go *(targeting the eye with check left hooks),* and at the end of EVERY she caused Sorano to bleed bad over her face.
*4.* The cut made most of Katie's punches twice as effective.
*5.* The Ref took a point of Katie - which I thought was stupid really. Leaning into your opponent and wanting to fight on the inside, should not be illegal. It is the obvious way to fight if you have a much shorter reach - and making this kinda inside work "illegal" is extremely unfair imo.
*6. Overall,* Sorano might have the better punch stats - but Katie's light jab to Sorano's split eye was more damaging + effective than a power punch from Sorano on Katie.
*7. Therefore,* Katie's aggression (while maybe not illustrated by the stats) was far more effective. You only needed to look at both of their faces after the fight - and you could see who had been battered.
*8. To conclude, Katie CLEARLY won!!*
*P.s. - Yes obviously headbutts are illegal and not scored - But,* the extra damage caused by punches after & due to the vulnerable area opened up the headbutt, is still scored. Thus, I am confused af as to how anyone can think that Sorano won that fight. Katie played the perfect Matador, baiting Sorano in, setting traps, targetting the cut, and if the fight continued how it was going - Sorano would've ended up blinded in one eye & KO'd.
Claressa has always been jealous of Amanda. She's delusional.
Let let go fight Taylor,,maybe talking diferent...dammmmm
I watched the whole fight live with no sound and thought serrano clearly won by a couple of rounds. It was a good fight and katie came on after a rough first couple of rounds, but i didnt listen to any commentary and thought serrano won. More aggressive, landed more and landed harder. Katie boxed well after the start but dont think it was enough
clarissa a bum, she's a hater 💀
Clarissa you legend, thank you for your honesty ❤
I don't know, commending her for aiming continuously for a head butt cut to gain the upper hand, is actually not good....
Taylor was definitely leading with her head a lot.
Y'all goofy as hell, if u don't think Katie was fighting dirty early. After the cut, she started working that area. 🧠. Before the cut, it was different.
Of course Claressa will defend Katie against Amanda 😂
I have no respect for dirty fighters.
Oh dear ! That's just stupid .
😅😂😅
And I have no respect for cry babies. Kate didn't do that purposely. That happens when a righty fights a lefty, sometimes.
Kate is just tougher 🇮🇪
And we here have no respect for you my friend.🙄
katie is a dirty fighter!😡
That cut ruined the fight just like the first, two fights wasn't close tbh cos it's clear Amanda beat her in both fights. Katey is a dirty fighter and the refs was terrible cos Amanda complained several times during the fight and Katey should've been disqualified
Claressa Shield always been jelous of Amanda Serrano so doesnt surprise me her BS opinion
The best fighter won
100% Clarissa
Shields is so pooping herself over the idea that Amanda might be considered the gwoat that she'll say anything. Clearly Taylor won the bout by headbutt. Taylor is now the dirtiest female boxer in history, the headbutt queen of all times.
Katie used Raiders rule #1 Cheating is encouraged and then used Raiders rule # 2 Refer back to rule #1. Love it! 😂
All the talking about amanda serrano getting robbed will not change the result of katie getting her hand raised congratulations on katie taylors win she's the goat no need for trilogy 😉
Complete biased commentary awful to listen to it
Real recognize real
Rewatch that fight the head butts came after Amanda landed good shots on Taylor. Yeah it might hade been accidental causing the cut but the 3 times after that intentional
It isnt dirty tactics. Its another case of a southpaw causing accidental headbuts and an American who cant deal with losing to a non American. Katie was brilliant. Amanda did extremely well to go the distance but she is ruining it with the excuses and the sour grapes. I think the final score was extremely generous to serrano and she should be more magnanimous in defeat. She lacks class.
The commentators were terrible too. No boxing experience and just cheering for the American. Katie would land combo after combo and all they would say is she looks tired. Serrano gets in a glancing blow and they are calling it a huge hit.
It’s ok to be wrong
Clarissa shields bores me to death. It doesn’t mean I don’t respect her skills but I don’t waste my time watching her fight.
About time. Clarissa was 100% honest and I’m impressed with her analysis. She is so right. Katie won
Katie look defeated almost every round
Amanda won smh the best thing Katie did was an illegal head but and Amanda landed and threw more punches
It's boxing it's no badmenton
She really stayed a head of the fight 😅
Katie learnt from the first fight Amanda fights dirty, head & elbows for 10 rnds.
This fight Katie was smarter in the clinch kept her head down fought fire with fire, head to head.
Amanda not so great lol
I agree with Clarissa
She's a heater
You wrong claressa, Amanda got robbed again!😡
She definitely was leading with that head
Thank you
Nah Amanda won
TAYLOR WON THE FIGHT MUCH BETTER FIGHTER
Should of been a draw at the least
Watch the fight back without the ridiculous commentary lol
100% correct Clarissa. Great analysis
Smart words ,listen the best of they best❤.
Them You go to fight next Taylor,,,than You SEE...dammmm
Shes a hater
She a HATER!!
GWOAT AMANDA SERRANO 🇵🇷👸🙏💪🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
😂😂😂😂😂
Ella es contrario de Amanda por eso habla así.
Amanda won🇵🇷🇵🇷
That's what i thought too. I thought Katie won barely
Head butt where dirty stop over analyzing . K.i.S.S
No only Amanda hit the biggest shots amanda landed 100 more punches
Bro doesn’t know how boxing is scored 😂😂😂😂
"Biggest shots" how? Maybe by force of the punch - but if you do the most powerful punch on someone's arm - it's not going to do much damage to them. Katie had the most damaging shots - because she targetted them to Sorano's eye. After round 4, *Sorano finished every round COVERED IN BLOOD!* If she was doing more damage with "bigger shots", shouldn't Katie have been bleeding too?
Katie threw less powerful shots, and still do double the damage Sorano was doing - and Boxing is scored on "effective aggression" not "biggest/most shots landed".
And still lost even with a bias judge, you are not making much sense here.
😂😂😂😂😂yes you are a hater 😂😂
The Irish head butter lmfaoooo ☘️
I concur
It's an MVP promotion afterall. Taylor is just more skilled.
It’s called boxing it’s not dirty tactics it’s called boxing..
Lady....you forgot all the headbutts by Taylor.
U Trippin
The fight was so sad that Amanda could've really got hurt sense it started she was getting hit with the head and it was very clear the message, they didn't wanted her to win I won't watch boxing no more in my entire life dirty, dirty , dirty from all angles 😢