Seems to be a pretty good kit when the components are genuine. I'm glad your power supplies are back up to snuff. Thanks for sharing your electronics adventures amigo.🤠👍
@Sonic_Ox Yeah nice compact easy build. Pity the first one didn't work out so well. Not sure where the 100 watts per channel come from with this circuit. The IC is spec'd for it in an ideal circuit but as the ideals can fall apart with temperature gain.... lol
Compadre, what's your next project? I was hoping you would take on something a lot more challenging like a 1000W amplifier. 😅 come in knock our socks off ! Can I ask what is the best of the best of the biggest kits? I've looked at a few and its very challenging to just find an amp of good quality. How many of the big amps is worth building? You've built an incredible amount of amps. What are your thoughts on the bigger amplifiers say around the 600~1000W range?
@decem_unosquattro9538 I can't justify buying, building, then building power supplies for and testing 1000 watt amplifiers. Sorry. Also I can't think of why I may need one. As you know this is a very small Vlog which doesn't make any money and so can not buy. If you want to finance a 1000 watt build let me know. I am open to your offers.
0:39 I looked on the specs it's 100W peaks not continuous which is typically what Chinese sellers state while it is probably accurate it's not as you know a RMS rating which is kinda annoying. 🤔
@decem_unosquattro9538 The specs according the the TDA7294 datasheet state 100 watts music power, which I find, as you do, annoying. I am sure most of us we would like our watts to be RMS. So if we see the RMS output power the test showed, we could almost say if we want to use the music power term, (can this be interchanged with 'peek music power output'?) I think we might have been looking at 90+ watts. Good catch Dec... nice to see!
@decem_unosquattro9538 The ST TDA7294 datasheet table 3 provides the electrical characteristics. RMS and PO parameters are provided including 4 ohm and 8 ohm variables. I think this is interesting : Music Power (RMS) IEC268.3 RULES - ∆t = 1 s
@KorAllRBare Noted! I have added a section (TDA7294 Electrical Characteristics) to the community section of this channel. The datasheet also includes 6 Ohm loads.
![VICTOR Denmark Open 2024 | An Se Young (KOR) [1] vs. Gregoria Mariska Tunjung (INA) [5] | SF](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Y3QEyCih85s/mqdefault.jpg)
Seems to be a pretty good kit when the components are genuine. I'm glad your power supplies are back up to snuff. Thanks for sharing your electronics adventures amigo.🤠👍
@Sonic_Ox Yeah nice compact easy build. Pity the first one didn't work out so well. Not sure where the 100 watts per channel come from with this circuit.
The IC is spec'd for it in an ideal circuit but as the ideals can fall apart with temperature gain.... lol
I like the looks of that one. It's got me designing enclosures in my mind lol.
Compadre, what's your next project? I was hoping you would take on something a lot more challenging like a 1000W amplifier. 😅 come in knock our socks off ! Can I ask what is the best of the best of the biggest kits? I've looked at a few and its very challenging to just find an amp of good quality.
How many of the big amps is worth building?
You've built an incredible amount of amps.
What are your thoughts on the bigger amplifiers say around the 600~1000W range?
@decem_unosquattro9538 I can't justify buying, building, then building power supplies for and testing 1000 watt amplifiers. Sorry. Also I can't think of why I may need one.
As you know this is a very small Vlog which doesn't make any money and so can not buy. If you want to finance a 1000 watt build let me know. I am open to your offers.
@@Elecifun Okay, fair enough. 👍🙂
at 20 hertz if you want it to be more square you need to make the coupling capacitors bigger and this will also allow lower frequencies through.
0:39 I looked on the specs it's 100W peaks not continuous which is typically what Chinese sellers state while it is probably accurate it's not as you know a RMS rating which is kinda annoying. 🤔
@decem_unosquattro9538 The specs according the the TDA7294 datasheet state 100 watts music power, which I find, as you do, annoying.
I am sure most of us we would like our watts to be RMS.
So if we see the RMS output power the test showed, we could almost say if we want to use the music power term, (can this be interchanged with 'peek music power output'?) I think we might have been looking at 90+ watts.
Good catch Dec... nice to see!
@@Elecifun Yeah, that's right compardre it's a PMPO rating which makes the specs look better but yeah it's not an RMS (root means square) rating.
@decem_unosquattro9538 The ST TDA7294 datasheet table 3 provides the electrical characteristics.
RMS and PO parameters are provided including 4 ohm and 8 ohm variables.
I think this is interesting : Music Power (RMS) IEC268.3 RULES - ∆t = 1 s
Not bad, not bad at all, Err-I would like to see how this medium power amplifier goes with 4 Ohm load Err-speakers..
BTW 👁👍
@KorAllRBare Noted!
I have added a section (TDA7294 Electrical Characteristics) to the community section of this channel. The datasheet also includes 6 Ohm loads.