The fire scene in the movie made me cry so much 😢 Honestly it’s one of the greatest movies I’ve ever seen. The fact that there are those who say it’s all fiction convinced me even more that there’s truth in her story because there are so many men who rather erase women from history just because they held the title of Queen, because they did great things for the people and country, and so many men hate that idea of a woman being admired and having influence they rather deny her existence. This has always happened in history even in Egypt there great women Pharaohs who built amazing architecture, made Egypt richer and kept peace, yet of course they rarely are mentioned or taught simply because they were women..And I mean way before Cleopatra. So I’m not surprised at all that the Rama Padmini haters are so quick to deny her and make a big fight about allowing a woman to be great even in a movie!
The Authentic True History Of Padmavati: Written on Date 1210, 1220 and 1300 AD. It clearly states that Padmavati was a simple woman like many other women’s and wife of Raja Ratan Sen of Rajput. The Historian’s written in those day of Rajput, Brshman’s and Muslim's doesn’t describe about her extraordinary beautifulness neither her superiority beauty. There was problem territory between Chittor King Raja Ratan Sen (husband of Padmavati) and neighbour Kumbalner regior King Raja Devpal. The Problem led to combat between these two nearby Territories of Chiior and Kumbalner due to which Chittor regime Raja Ratan Sen was defeated and killed along with his many soldiers by Kumbalner Raja Devpal with his Army. so Chittor was occupied under Devpal magistrate. In Rajputs its very old sacred practice of Sati of woman on terms of her husband have been dead or killed. Therefore, Rajput Sacred Sati was practiced on all the women’s whose Husband were Killed in that combat due to which Rani Padmavati (wife of Raja Ratan Sen) along with other women’s were welcomed to holy Sati event and burnt to death by the rituals followers. After few months, Alaudin Khalji needed to expand his territory to Rajasthan, Gujarat and some places of Present Maharashtra. The Historian of 1297 states: Alaudin Khalji not only concurred/occupied Chittor but also Ranthambore, Chanderi, Dhar, Ujjain and Mewar in that same month of time and it wasn’t due to Padmavati. Confirmed. Alaudin Khalji Territorial expansion was friendlier, where he used to give a friendlier hand written letter to all the expansion regions kings to come under the regime of Mughal Sultane and enjoy their unity and correlation under one Kingdome. Some offered hands in hands happily, while some Fighted with him, of one such combat was Kumbalner & Chittor Raja Devpal and Alaudin. But in 1900 the store of Alaudin was faked and written as present Padmavati to degrade the Mughal King by Sanghi. In 1900, then Hindu sanghi historian faked and written a new story of Beautiful Rani Pandmavati and affairs Mughal King Alaudin ….. Hahaa, This was famous epics that time, the Fake Rani Padmavati was popularize in journals and Story Books. Then in 1980, the rise of sanghi: made Rani Padmavati serials and movie too ,… the same mith followed now by sanghi make another movie of Padmavati to degrade Mughals. Jawaharlal Nehru in 1940s : Said Rani Padmavati is a local poem made now a day and it fakes the actual Truth. PLEASE GUYS READ THE HISTORY OF 1200 AND 1300, NOT THE SANGHI’S MADE HISTORY OF AND FROM 1900.
History is funny my friend. There are various "Versions" of it. There is no agreement or disagreement on it. You can just debate. Neither we nor you were present at the time to prove the truth.
This is exactly what I said..men hate to see a woman have any influence or power so they change the story to make her look average and focus on what the men did, that’s what they care about. They cannot stand for a woman to be great 😂 why you so uncomfortable about a great woman who was loved by her people hundreds of years ago? Why you hate on women so much and think only men should matter? Get over yourself lol
It is Rani Padmini not Rani Padmavati. Please see the details of her birth. She was not a Sinhalese or Ceylon princess.Rani Padmini was born in Rajasthan. She belonged to a royal family from the Pungal region in Jaisalmer. She was not born in Sri Lanka. Details of her birth are mentioned in Tavarik-e-Jaislamer, dating back to the 14th century. It says that Padmini was born in 1285 in a royal family to Rawal Punyapal, who later moved to Sihrar which became Singhal Dweep in later texts such as 'Padmavat' and 'Singoli'. This was said by the JSS Jauhar Smriti Sansthan. Sri lanka has had no connection with her birth or ancestry. I was very unsure when I heard she was a Sri Lankan princess.Sinhalese culture is very different from the Indian / Rajput Culture. She really existed a Divine beauty.
Ok with all the different stories where exactly does one find the details of her story without some uncomfortable men who can’t stand for a woman to be a Queen, to be loved or have influence? These men are everywhere they jump in every story and deny her existence and believe only men matter and would rather never for women to be mentioned. Honestly these men really make me wonder what is their problem with women lol
The fire scene in the movie made me cry so much 😢 Honestly it’s one of the greatest movies I’ve ever seen.
The fact that there are those who say it’s all fiction convinced me even more that there’s truth in her story because there are so many men who rather erase women from history just because they held the title of Queen, because they did great things for the people and country, and so many men hate that idea of a woman being admired and having influence they rather deny her existence.
This has always happened in history even in Egypt there great women Pharaohs who built amazing architecture, made Egypt richer and kept peace, yet of course they rarely are mentioned or taught simply because they were women..And I mean way before Cleopatra. So I’m not surprised at all that the Rama Padmini haters are so quick to deny her and make a big fight about allowing a woman to be great even in a movie!
Good historical tale
The Authentic True History Of Padmavati: Written on Date 1210, 1220 and 1300 AD.
It clearly states that Padmavati was a simple woman like many other women’s and wife of Raja Ratan Sen of Rajput. The Historian’s written in those day of Rajput, Brshman’s and Muslim's doesn’t describe about her extraordinary beautifulness neither her superiority beauty.
There was problem territory between Chittor King Raja Ratan Sen (husband of Padmavati) and neighbour Kumbalner regior King Raja Devpal. The Problem led to combat between these two nearby Territories of Chiior and Kumbalner due to which Chittor regime Raja Ratan Sen was defeated and killed along with his many soldiers by Kumbalner Raja Devpal with his Army. so Chittor was occupied under Devpal magistrate.
In Rajputs its very old sacred practice of Sati of woman on terms of her husband have been dead or killed.
Therefore, Rajput Sacred Sati was practiced on all the women’s whose Husband were Killed in that combat due to which Rani Padmavati (wife of Raja Ratan Sen) along with other women’s were welcomed to holy Sati event and burnt to death by the rituals followers.
After few months, Alaudin Khalji needed to expand his territory to Rajasthan, Gujarat and some places of Present Maharashtra.
The Historian of 1297 states: Alaudin Khalji not only concurred/occupied Chittor but also Ranthambore, Chanderi, Dhar, Ujjain and Mewar in that same month of time and it wasn’t due to Padmavati. Confirmed.
Alaudin Khalji Territorial expansion was friendlier, where he used to give a friendlier hand written letter to all the expansion regions kings to come under the regime of Mughal Sultane and enjoy their unity and correlation under one Kingdome. Some offered hands in hands happily, while some Fighted with him, of one such combat was Kumbalner & Chittor Raja Devpal and Alaudin.
But in 1900 the store of Alaudin was faked and written as present Padmavati to degrade the Mughal King by Sanghi.
In 1900, then Hindu sanghi historian faked and written a new story of Beautiful Rani Pandmavati and affairs Mughal King Alaudin ….. Hahaa,
This was famous epics that time, the Fake Rani Padmavati was popularize in journals and Story Books. Then in 1980, the rise of sanghi: made Rani Padmavati serials and movie too ,… the same mith followed now by sanghi make another movie of Padmavati to degrade Mughals.
Jawaharlal Nehru in 1940s : Said Rani Padmavati is a local poem made now a day and it fakes the actual Truth.
PLEASE GUYS READ THE HISTORY OF 1200 AND 1300, NOT THE SANGHI’S MADE HISTORY OF AND FROM 1900.
History is funny my friend. There are various "Versions" of it. There is no agreement or disagreement on it. You can just debate. Neither we nor you were present at the time to prove the truth.
Kamar Alam we know the Mughals had tyrant King like the Aurangzeb.. history was truly intimidating
This is exactly what I said..men hate to see a woman have any influence or power so they change the story to make her look average and focus on what the men did, that’s what they care about. They cannot stand for a woman to be great 😂 why you so uncomfortable about a great woman who was loved by her people hundreds of years ago? Why you hate on women so much and think only men should matter? Get over yourself lol
It is Rani Padmini not Rani Padmavati. Please see the details of her birth. She was not a Sinhalese or Ceylon princess.Rani Padmini was born in Rajasthan. She belonged to a royal family from the Pungal region in Jaisalmer. She was not born in Sri Lanka. Details of her birth are mentioned in Tavarik-e-Jaislamer, dating back to the 14th century. It says that Padmini was born in 1285 in a royal family to Rawal Punyapal, who later moved to Sihrar which became Singhal Dweep in later texts such as 'Padmavat' and 'Singoli'. This was said by the JSS Jauhar Smriti Sansthan. Sri lanka has had no connection with her birth or ancestry. I was very unsure when I heard she was a Sri Lankan princess.Sinhalese culture is very different from the Indian / Rajput Culture. She really existed a Divine beauty.
Ok with all the different stories where exactly does one find the details of her story without some uncomfortable men who can’t stand for a woman to be a Queen, to be loved or have influence? These men are everywhere they jump in every story and deny her existence and believe only men matter and would rather never for women to be mentioned. Honestly these men really make me wonder what is their problem with women lol