I want to know how he worked out such smooth locomotion in Knex. It’s too brief and small to clearly see how the model is built but I’d like to make my own.
A word about Jurassic Park. Around the time Michael Crichton was writing his novel, a paleontologist (Gregory Paul, I believe) released a paper addressing and partially revising dromaeosaur taxonomy. Specifically, Paul considered Deinonychus to be a junior synonym of Velociraptor, thus renaming it to Velociraptor antirrhopus. Crichton used this paper for his resource material, which is where the confusion stems from.
it ought to be the other way around, since deinonychus is much bigger than velocirraptor. anyway, even if I'm not a fan of the JP franchise AT ALL, I remember that back in the day I read the book, and then saw the movie, and I always thought they had swapped V with D just to have a larger dinosaur in the film, but kept the name thinking it sounded cooler. I don't recall that anything in the novel suggested velocirraptor to be larger than it really is. this always bothered me from the beginning, the same way that they decided to shrink dilophosaurus just because. I've always found surprising how very often people mention these movies ever since, even in scientific context, I guess they made a profound impression upon fans of a certain generation, an impression to which I was immune. When they were promoting the first JP, they said they had professional paleontologists giving top notch advice and all that, but they actually took many liberties for the sake of dramatism or whatever, and those movies are really, really poor from a cinematographic point of view.
I was rewatching old YDAW vids and I saw this comment, I just thought I'd back it up with a quote from the book. "Ellie said "but the animal we just saw, the velociraptor- you said it was a mongoliensis?" "From the location of the amber," Wu said. "It is from China." "Interesting," Grant said. "I was just digging up an infant antirrhopus"" -Chrichton 127-128. Crichton specifies the dino in the park is mongoliensis, then incorrectly says antirrhopus is a velociraptor species, then proceeds to write the rest of the book as if mongoliensis is closer to D. antirrhopus size than to chicken size. Great book though.
@@c.l.6957 In the resource material Chriton used they labeled Deinonychus as Velociraptor Antirrhopus. By the time the movie came out (it could have been earlier) everyone involved knew of the mistake (just like they were aware of feathered dinos) but kept the name because it sounded cooler and was easier to pronounce.
@@canalsoloparaverunvideodem8451 I always had the impression the Raptors in JP (the novel) where oversized, otherwise they wouldn't be that big of a threat. Remember one got hit by a rpg and all it did was wound the dinosaur. As far as the name goes, aside from cooler I've always read that partly why Spielberg stuck with velociraptor was because it was easier to pronounce. Which I really can't argue with, to this day I struggle with spelling deinonychus, let alone saying it.
@@canalsoloparaverunvideodem8451 also I believe somewhere it's mentioned the dilo was a juvenile, and from a cinematic point of view, it's actually pretty well done, it would not have the following it does today. It's ok to not like something just because you don't like it, don't need to make up a reason for not liking it.
I'm not a palenotologist, but loved dinosaurs as a kid and still "geek out" on them today. I grew up in the 60s and the 70s thinking the dinosaur images made by Knight were really cool: dinosaurs were slow, "cold-blooded", reptilian, mean, relentless, powerful, dark creatures moving around in primordial swamps, fighting and dying in epic, earth-shaking battles. But then I saw the original and really beautiful Bakker drawing of Deinonychus in the early 80s and it blew my mind: it still had the look of a reptile, but it was a jet-fighter, a Corvette, a sprinting rapier of a predator. A dinosaurian cheetah. It was mind-blowing. Even the name, "Terrible Claw"...so awesome. One can't understate how ground-breaking this find was and how Ostrem really made the connection to birds...very cool. And still is to this day.
Thank you, I think the way you teach science on youtube should be a model for all the other hyped sciency channels that go for a more superficial, poorly referenced with-jokeys-in-teh-middle approach.
There is also a kickstarter funded project called “Beasts of the Mesozoic” creating Posable dinosaur figures they have done the Raptors like Velociraptor, Pryoraptor, Dromeosaurus, and Etc. Currently they are working on the Ceratopsian Dinosaurs.
@@victorshen9257 it's not technically a reptile either. Pelycosaur . Mammalian reptile or maybe more accurate reptilian mammal. pelycosaurs were kind of like missing link from reptile to mammal.
+animalman57 Problem there is that any Deinocheirus toys are like to be made as accurate as possible, because they've only been made since the full body was revealed.
G. S. Paul: **believes that Velociraptor and Deinonychus are the same dinosaur (despite separation by different continents, roughly 40 million years, and different skeletons)** Every other paleontologist with a fully functioning brain: **[visible confusion]**
You guys are amazing!!! Just the first minute had me almost subbed lol but all ur actual facts with citations had me in love. You guys need to go mainstream worldwide. I’m so tired of ignorant channels giving misinformation out!!!! Spreading ignorance is horrible. They’re like the enemies of truth and knowledge. Stay scientific dawgs! I’ll always be watching you guys and spreading the channel/vids. It’s honestly a privilege. Thank you.
YAY! New video! 5:45 The Utahraptor outline is a bit outdated, recnet discoveries seem to show that Utahraptor was a lot bulkier than smaller Dromeosaurids.
You’ll be really happy to know that Safari Ltd is working hard to update the ones you’ve done. Today I saw accurate Velociraptor (and this exact inaccurate Velociraptor/Deinonychus toy oddly enough). I also saw accurate T-Rex, Deinocheirus, Archaeopteryx, and Therazinosaurus toys, as well as some pretty good Pterosaurs in proper quadrupedal posture with pycnofibers.
If I ever get a pet bird I'm naming it Deinonychus; if it's male I'll nickname him Nyki (pronounced as Nicky) or Dein (Dean), if female I'll nickname her Deina (Diana)
About the note at 10:46 the term foreleg can and now does typically mean the foremost extension of a leg. Because of the ever changing nature of English it no longer is used to describe a four legged critter. Thank God cause that was archaic as hell
Can't really remember the exact reason but in my childhood this was my favorite dinosaur, I know I had 2 of them from Dinoriders which might have been the influence. Now a day with all the talk about feathers on dinosaurs and dinosaur sounds, One bird I that makes me think of "raptors" is the Magpie. (Long tail, feather color, the sounds that they make, intelligence and maybe even pack like structure)
There is another reason deinonychus was confused with Velociraptor in jurassic park. Crichton mixed up his sources for his book, making deinonychus velociraptor arthirropus.
Not exactly. Crichton actually knew that his velociraptors were deinonychuses, and its mentioned in the dialogue between characters _within_ the book itself. They (inGen) chose to use velociraptor because it was more viscous sounding.
He never mixed up his sources lmfao. Deinonychus Arthirropus was also called Velociraptor Arthirropus. In the books, its directly adressed why the raptors are so large and are called raptors instead of Deinonychus. Just read the book or watch a video on it, but get something straight. Crichton did not mess up his sources
Yay! Haha just saw this and kind of got hyped and excited when you mentioned my name! Thanks for making the video man! :) Btw, you said deeman correctly but for 'gamez' its just the word games :P
I got here looking for the doom metal band Deinonychus, I have no interest in Dinosaurs but this guy is so interesting I ended up watching the whole thing, the background music is so well selected for the video it's mind blowing.
Honestly, when I draw a sort-of crest on a Deinonychus, it's really just artistic-liberaty. When i draw dinosaurs I try to keep it realistic, but a flat, pigeon-like head looks to bland IMO
the opposite of hypertrophy would be hypotrophy. The two prefixes are used opposite of each other in instances where there is a scalar difference between an above position and a below position. Sometimes also used to describe size. I think the a- prefix doesn't have an opposite, it just negates what it comes before, so the opposite of atrophy should be trophy, which, if hypertrophy is overgrowth and hypotrophy is undergrowth, then trophy could mean the presence of a grown body part in the first place. Which would mean atrophy should mean the complete loss of a body part, but english isn't a constructed language lol
Wait, so feather-bearing deinonychus reconstructions were being made as early as the 80s? And Jurassic Park still somehow ended up making them a bunch of baldies, huh.
I feel like saying that it had a tail fan because Microraptor had one is like saying a Lynx must have a mane, because you found a Lion with the mane preserved. There's been some serious over-correction in giving _every_ dinosaur flamboyant feathers just because they were far more bird-like than people once supposed.
I love how he said its hands are pretty accurate because they are faced inwards, unlike in some movies and ark. Simply because he specifically mentioned ark, one of the most inaccurate modern dinosaur games. That just made me laugh because it is so popular and he specifically mentions it rather than in "video games". I found this funny, oh and please do a video on me!
Dako I know Im late but considering the raptor in ark is a fucking UTAHRAPTOR, yeah, id say its a kinda inaccurate representation of an animal it is not. And Im pretty sure he said art not ark. And for the most part ark is realistic and accurate, aside from the giganotosaurus being bigger than the trex, even though in real life they were pretty closely sized. What else is inaccurate about ark.
No, Ark is not very accurate whatsoever. Even though their raptor is based on Utahraptor, it is still extremely inaccurate. I still like the game, and the developers _know_ that its not accurate. The game is meant to be fun and cool, not accurate and educational, and they 100% know this. They tend to grossly exaggerate size, not just on the giganotosaurus but other animals as well. And they tend to exaggerate features as well, to make them stand out from each other more. For example, Kaprosuchus, being a crocodillian, probably couldn't leap 200 feat horizontally. But they needed it to stand out from the sarcosuchus, so they just posted that onto it.
I had the exact same pronunciation issue with Dinonychus. Similarly until relatively recently: PA-ra-SAUR-oh-LOW-fuss (Parasaurolophus) seh-LOFF-ehsis (Coelophysis)
On pronunciation - My biology teacher told us what her professor taught her: "Whoever pronounces it the loudest and most confident is correct." We are mashing Greek, Latin, German, Chinese, other languages, and proper nouns together. There is no way to "properly" pronounce these names.
That deinonychus toy looks like what would happen if Robert Bakker's deinonychus depiction had sex with a hybrid between an iguanadon and one of those vaguely t-rex like "dinosaurs" from old children's books/cartoons, had a kid with it and overfed it, then it grew up living in unbearable agony
Man part of me wants to send you what I consider one of the worst examples of a velociraptor toy I have ever found. It not only suffers from the usual problems (like no feathers and wrong arm positions etc) but I am thinking it is a recycled sculpt of some kind. This velociraptor toy has the head of a herbivore. It has a beaked mouth with no teeth and cheeks. Makes me think of really old terrible iguanadon reconstructions and I wouldn't have guessed it was a velociraptor if it wasn't for the toe claw and the text on the belly claiming that is what it's suppose to be. (it should be noted this toy has the date of 2000)
I think I may have 3 of the animals you are talking about , mine are literally an iguanodon with raptor feet, I cannot tell what it is as it has no name and is around 1 centimetre long it is brown in colour with darker brown stripes. It is also on four leger , as if it was meant to be an iguanodon but with raptor toes
I also have one like that it came in a set with an ankylosaurus that had a very triangular head from the dorsal view, tons of spikes on the front and almost no club on its tail
I know I'm a million years late but I always have to comment when it comes up... the Jurassic Park raptors were in fact based on Utahraptor. In one of the features on the DVD set I have they talk about how they hesitated to make the raptors as big as they did because they had no precedent for a dromeosaur of that size. However, WHILE THEY WERE FILMING Utahraptor was dug up and one of the archaeologists on that team called up the consultants for the film and they then went forward in making it as big as they did. Utahraptor wasn't described officially until later, but that doesn't mean the community wasn't aware of it.
I have an original 1978 national geographic magazine with a large segment on his thoughts on deinonychus. It features a drawing that is way ahead of its time for an animal discovered in the 60s. I mean its not feathered but its a really good image of the animal.
For a behind-the-scenes look at why they went with Velociraptor for Jurassic Park I recommend reading the intro to Raptor Red (if you haven't already).
I never knew dinosaurs inspired such intense nerdiness. Hell, why not? They lived on an ancient version of Earth and neither will never occur in nature again.
The English Y has many origins. One is the Greek letter Ypsilon, which was pronounced Ü and is the precursor of the Latin V, which in turn gave birth to U and W. The Romans were too lazy to write the stem apparently. In the past the Greek Y has often been pronounced U. For example in the Mother Goose rhyme, "Polly put the kettle on/ Sukey took it off again", Sukey could also be spelled Psyche.
Jurassic Park was the best (at the time) special effects dinosaur movie ever. For myself, while watching it, I was very perturbed by the gross amount of inaccuracies. However, it spurred a huge amount of interest in dinosaurs which helped activate the public awareness and scientific curiosity.
Do you think you could do an episode on ammosaurus and anchisaurus as there is debate on whether or not they are the same dinosaurs.... I'd be curious to see you compare the two. Thanx Steve! Keep up the awesome vids!
Before you do the Velociraptor episode I think you could also mention Achillobator as an inspiration for the Jurassic Park raptors. It was from Mongolia, and believed to be a Velociraptor species before it was classified in 1999. It was also similar size to Deinonychus.
Ezekiel O'Callaghan I only mention Jurassic Park because, for a large segment of the population, those films are the only point of contact with dinosaurs. A lot of people might not know what a _Deinonychus_ or _Achillobator_ was, but they recognize a raptor. That said: yes, we should definitely cover how the raptor misconception came about.
i saw something that suggested that the big claw on the foot might have been used to climb trees, as opposed to tearing apart prey. What do we think about that?
2018 here checking in. I love these videos. I hope Steven eventually learns the word "genera". It's pronounced jĕn'ə-rə gen-er-a. "Genre" is similar but different.
I have been trying my hand at dromaeosaurid restorations for quite some time now. I still almost always get something wrong. You clarified that the feathers are attached to the second finger, but I have some issues with that. How long were the feathers on that finger? It seems impractical to have long feathers on an instrument used to subdue prey. Were all three fingers free to move? If so, the feathers on them would move, too, which would be more than a bit clumsy if the feathers were long. It seems weird to put long, fragile feathers on an instrument used to kill prey. One night about fifteen years ago, my pet bird got frightened in the night and landed hard on his tail. He lost several feathers and damaged one of the follicles. His tail will never have a complete set of feathers again. And that was just from a hard landing. Think of the thrashing that would happen while a large dromaeosaur struggled to subdue prey. Long feathers on fingers would be a definite impediment. So perhaps the feathers on the hands and fingers should be small protofeathers rather than a shafted feather with barbs. Or perhaps the hands and fingers should be entirely bare. Would a dinosaur's bare hands still have scales passed down from reptilian ancestors or would the skin be more akin to the bare skin found on turkeys and vultures? Quill knobs found on the ulnae of _Velociraptor_ skeletons suggest long feathers protruded from the arm, but I'm thinking these should _not_ extend to the hands. The long fingers on _Deinonychus_ look like weapons, not structures to support long, fragile feathers. If you look at the anatomy of a bird, the longest flight feathers are on the hand and the remainder are on the ulna. The humerus does not support any flight feathers. When I look at restorations of feathered dinos on Wikipedia and elsewhere, I see the same arrangement as that of birds: long feathers on the hands and fingers. I've used that arrangement myself, but it really doesn't make sense if the larger dromaeosaurids used their long fingers and claws to subdue prey. TBH, I think only the ulna should have a few longer feathers for display, leaving the hands either bare or with smaller protofeathers that would not get in the way. Putting an entire "wing" on the hands and fingers of the larger dromaeosaurids seems contrary to their purpose. One other thing: _Microraptor_ obviously had long flight feathers on its hands and fingers. Could it bend its fingers? If so, that would probably be counterproductive to gliding. Is it possible that the second and third fingers were fused inside the integument to provide a more rigid structure for the flight feathers? I'm wondering what paleontologists have to say about this issue. Thanks.
Well, high-five for feathered paleoart! Have you read Martyniuk's blog post breaking down the Senter (2006) & Sullivan (2010) articles about forelimb function? [dinogoss 2011_05_01] What about Dr. Hone's post about Microraptor's hand feathers? [archosaurmusings 2010/03/04] (I would link you properly but RUclips doesn't let me put links in comments.) As for your feathered forearm but fuzzy and/or scaly hand proposition...it doesn't _contradict_ any evidence I've seen. Like, the 'primitive' condition for dromeosaurs' feet would've been pennaceous feathers, yet we restore them with fluff or scutes, so unless we get direct evidence proving primaries I suppose there's no reason _not_ to restore them that way. That said, if their arm feathers served some purpose other than display, suppressing the expression of pennaceous feathers on the fingers might've been more trouble than it was worth. (Admittedly, if they were used primarily to push air around we'd probably see quill knobs on the larger animals). You might be underestimating the strength & flexibility of feathers, while overestimating their length relative to the fingers, as well as the encumbrance they would represent in combat & predation. It's good that you're thinking about function & behavior when restoring dinosaur integument, though! Keep that up. As far as _Microraptor's_ fingers, I don't know enough about those critters to comment one way or the other.
Steven Bellettini No, I haven't read those papers, but I will Google the titles. I want to give you a longer answer. I didn't see your full comment because I had my RUclips "herp derp" extension enabled for use on videos where people are behaving like idiots. XD Your video doesn't fall under that category, thankfully. I'll get back to you after some study and thanks for your thoughtful reply.
Now that the actual look of Deinocheirus is pretty settled (badly beating our wildest imagination or most of them) will you do an episode on it eventually?
As a child, all the dinosaur books I read had the dumb shambling lump stumbling around swamps idea of dinosaurs. Reading Bakker's Dinosaur Heresies was like somebody switched the light on.
So I've been curious for a while... Have you seen the new Beasts of the Mesozoic Raptor figures? They are labelled as being the most scientifically accurate dinosaur toys out there. I wonder if you've seen them and had any thoughts on them.
This toy is still sold in the Dollar Tree I work at and I cry a little inside whenever someone buys it. P.S. I also said DInoNYchus for the first few decades of my life. I feel your pain.
Just some comments on the Jurassic Park version of these animals. Crichton based his animal on the Deinonychus, but he named them Velociraptor because it sounded "cooler", he has publicly stated this. It's not a mistake, he just decided to do it. His "velociraptors" are also incredibly powerful, what you see in the movies is toned down compared to the novel: Cheetah speed. Hyena-like bit-force, shown to be able to bite through steel wire. Chimpanzee intelligence, possibly a bit smarter. In one scene they are shown to do a vertical jump of 3 meters. They have some kind of weird decentralized nervous system (All the dino's), Muldoon uses a rocket-propelled grenade to take down a raptor since firearms aren't reliable. Chameleon-like camouflage, one raptor is stated to change its skin color to blend in. Gender-swapping. Social group animals. Pack-hunting behavior (Very advanced and rare trait). Migratory behavior, including them waiting for a boat to dock so they can board it. The JP T-rex is similarly overpowered. Henry Wu also states that he was so focused on results that he used DNA from whatever he had on hand to create the dinosaurs, he is also incapable of naming any of them. This could explain some of the strange traits of the "dinosaurs" in jurassic park, they alluded to this in Jurassic World.
*+ The winged Porpoise* Sorry! I learned this stuff from written sources, rather than lectures or videos, so there are a lot of words I've never actually heard out loud. For example, how do you actually pronounce jugal? Zhoo-gull? Joo-gaul? Fortunately our viewers are both helpful and forgiving when it comes to my idiosyncratic enunciation.
That makes sense and I noticed you don't know how to do the blue reply thing at the beginning which I as well don't know how to do that which is annoying when there are about 15 people replying to a comment (mainly on dinosaur videos which have more debates than others.)
When the robotic sauropod starts coming in to camera he's trying not to smile or laugh XD
I want to know how he worked out such smooth locomotion in Knex. It’s too brief and small to clearly see how the model is built but I’d like to make my own.
And so are we all
@@Hoshimaru57 I have a decades old set called K’nexasaurus Rex that moves fairly smoothly as well
A word about Jurassic Park. Around the time Michael Crichton was writing his novel, a paleontologist (Gregory Paul, I believe) released a paper addressing and partially revising dromaeosaur taxonomy. Specifically, Paul considered Deinonychus to be a junior synonym of Velociraptor, thus renaming it to Velociraptor antirrhopus. Crichton used this paper for his resource material, which is where the confusion stems from.
it ought to be the other way around, since deinonychus is much bigger than velocirraptor.
anyway, even if I'm not a fan of the JP franchise AT ALL, I remember that back in the day I read the book, and then saw the movie, and I always thought they had swapped V with D just to have a larger dinosaur in the film, but kept the name thinking it sounded cooler. I don't recall that anything in the novel suggested velocirraptor to be larger than it really is.
this always bothered me from the beginning, the same way that they decided to shrink dilophosaurus just because.
I've always found surprising how very often people mention these movies ever since, even in scientific context, I guess they made a profound impression upon fans of a certain generation, an impression to which I was immune. When they were promoting the first JP, they said they had professional paleontologists giving top notch advice and all that, but they actually took many liberties for the sake of dramatism or whatever, and those movies are really, really poor from a cinematographic point of view.
I was rewatching old YDAW vids and I saw this comment, I just thought I'd back it up with a quote from the book.
"Ellie said "but the animal we just saw, the velociraptor- you said it was a mongoliensis?"
"From the location of the amber," Wu said. "It is from China."
"Interesting," Grant said. "I was just digging up an infant antirrhopus"" -Chrichton 127-128.
Crichton specifies the dino in the park is mongoliensis, then incorrectly says antirrhopus is a velociraptor species, then proceeds to write the rest of the book as if mongoliensis is closer to D. antirrhopus size than to chicken size.
Great book though.
@@c.l.6957 In the resource material Chriton used they labeled Deinonychus as Velociraptor Antirrhopus. By the time the movie came out (it could have been earlier) everyone involved knew of the mistake (just like they were aware of feathered dinos) but kept the name because it sounded cooler and was easier to pronounce.
@@canalsoloparaverunvideodem8451 I always had the impression the Raptors in JP (the novel) where oversized, otherwise they wouldn't be that big of a threat. Remember one got hit by a rpg and all it did was wound the dinosaur. As far as the name goes, aside from cooler I've always read that partly why Spielberg stuck with velociraptor was because it was easier to pronounce. Which I really can't argue with, to this day I struggle with spelling deinonychus, let alone saying it.
@@canalsoloparaverunvideodem8451 also I believe somewhere it's mentioned the dilo was a juvenile, and from a cinematic point of view, it's actually pretty well done, it would not have the following it does today. It's ok to not like something just because you don't like it, don't need to make up a reason for not liking it.
I'm not a palenotologist, but loved dinosaurs as a kid and still "geek out" on them today. I grew up in the 60s and the 70s thinking the dinosaur images made by Knight were really cool: dinosaurs were slow, "cold-blooded", reptilian, mean, relentless, powerful, dark creatures moving around in primordial swamps, fighting and dying in epic, earth-shaking battles. But then I saw the original and really beautiful Bakker drawing of Deinonychus in the early 80s and it blew my mind: it still had the look of a reptile, but it was a jet-fighter, a Corvette, a sprinting rapier of a predator. A dinosaurian cheetah. It was mind-blowing. Even the name, "Terrible Claw"...so awesome. One can't understate how ground-breaking this find was and how Ostrem really made the connection to birds...very cool. And still is to this day.
I'm going to send a Barney costume.
madwonderland oh god.....
may i ask why?
Please send one
WHAT IS BARNEY?
MikeShatter they clearly just want to watch the world burn
Thank you, I think the way you teach science on youtube should be a model for all the other hyped sciency channels that go for a more superficial, poorly referenced with-jokeys-in-teh-middle approach.
hoarf wat about trey the explaining
looking at you Discovery News/Seeker.
There is also a kickstarter funded project called “Beasts of the Mesozoic” creating Posable dinosaur figures they have done the Raptors like Velociraptor, Pryoraptor, Dromeosaurus, and Etc.
Currently they are working on the Ceratopsian Dinosaurs.
tasty beasts of the mesozoic
ive got the balaur, zhenyuanlong and the eastern 2-pack hehe (≧∀≦)
Wow, I have had that Deinonychus figure for years and never knew what it was.
there is usually a label at the bottom
J.D. Norcross I always thought it was an iguanodon when I had it
Sparkii06 games You know something's wrong when a raptor is mistaken for Iguanodon! XDXD
Ultima ZillaRex but It does a bit....ok your right there is something wrong with me.
Sparkii06 games Not something wrong with you. I meant something wrong with the toy.
Cue dozens of Archaeopteryx toys arriving at TGG headquarters in 3. 2. 1...
dakotaraptor would be cool as they are basically speedy utahraptors there is no innacurate pop culture references to dakotaraptor yet
+Xandeogre I think the New Ice Age movie features them
Dakotaraptors were solitary hunter. But many think it's pack hunter when it was newly discovered
What about saurian?
Xandeowolf I'm definitely late but with saurian now there may be some mistakes in the Dakotaraptor
so what would be the point of doing this video then?
Quetzalcoatlus would be an interesting choice! I know it's not a dinosaur, but has that stopped you before?
A pterosaur and a mammal have been on the show before. Why not?
plesiosaurus
@@jeffreygao3956 What mammal? Not a mammal, a reptile, if you are referring to Dimetrodon.
@@victorshen9257 it's not technically a reptile either. Pelycosaur . Mammalian reptile or maybe more accurate reptilian mammal. pelycosaurs were kind of like missing link from reptile to mammal.
@@victorshen9257 stem-mammal
Please do Deinocheirus since it's body was fully revealed in 2014.
+animalman57 Problem there is that any Deinocheirus toys are like to be made as accurate as possible, because they've only been made since the full body was revealed.
Finally someone suggests Deinocheirus! It's one of my favorite dinos.
You say that like some development team has kept it secret until now...
animalman57 I get mixed up with Deinonichus and deinocherus
animalman57 hey animal man I see you all the time in prehistoric gaming's videos. Wus up
I lost it at the beginning. The intros never cease to amuse me.
G. S. Paul: **believes that Velociraptor and Deinonychus are the same dinosaur (despite separation by different continents, roughly 40 million years, and different skeletons)**
Every other paleontologist with a fully functioning brain: **[visible confusion]**
9:50 I was totally blown away when I first saw that dynamic sketch of Deinonychus by Bob Bakker.
i've seen this raptor toy at walmart here! i need to grab one, i love collecting "inaccuraptor" toys
Deinonyochus was one of my favorite raptors
I LOVE THIS SERIES! STEVE.....ANOTHER GREAT VIDEO, I COULD LISTEN AND WATCH YOU BREAK DINOSAURS DOWN ALL DAY!
Dear lord that Deinonychus toy is ugly O_O
+CJCroen1393 I have that toy
+CJCroen1393 I have that same toy. Lol.
I have a different one
I have that toy, labeled as a velociraptor!
Tyrannosaurus aegyptiacus 423 lol
How you say it normally: die-non-ik-us
How your grandparents say it: die-no-nye-cuss
You guys are amazing!!! Just the first minute had me almost subbed lol but all ur actual facts with citations had me in love. You guys need to go mainstream worldwide. I’m so tired of ignorant channels giving misinformation out!!!! Spreading ignorance is horrible. They’re like the enemies of truth and knowledge. Stay scientific dawgs! I’ll always be watching you guys and spreading the channel/vids. It’s honestly a privilege. Thank you.
Steve, the veins in your forearms could facilitate the flow of enough water to irrigate The [friggin'] Hanging Gardens.
Touch his chin? Like a philosoraptor?
gold
Poor Deinonychus, got his body stolen by Velociraptor thanks to Crichton and Jurassic Park.
5 years later... Velociraptor has finally been covered.
YAY! New video!
5:45 The Utahraptor outline is a bit outdated, recnet discoveries seem to show that Utahraptor was a lot bulkier than smaller Dromeosaurids.
Make your dinosaurs are wrong on Herrerasaurus.
You’ll be really happy to know that Safari Ltd is working hard to update the ones you’ve done. Today I saw accurate Velociraptor (and this exact inaccurate Velociraptor/Deinonychus toy oddly enough). I also saw accurate T-Rex, Deinocheirus, Archaeopteryx, and Therazinosaurus toys, as well as some pretty good Pterosaurs in proper quadrupedal posture with pycnofibers.
If I ever get a pet bird I'm naming it Deinonychus; if it's male I'll nickname him Nyki (pronounced as Nicky) or Dein (Dean), if female I'll nickname her Deina (Diana)
Ah yes, Nyki, nicking others with the large claw…
This show have such a dry sense of humor at times. It’s wonderful.
Man, I had my parents subscribe to the Dinosaur binder in the 90's, but you take this thing to a whole other level.
"About the size of a horse" *labeled 23 feet long*
its tail was really long but it weighed about as much as a horse, so therefore it was around the size of a horse
Probably meant more in overall volume, some weight ratio, or most likely *height* than length.
Deinonychus > Velociraptor
I loved deinonychus since I was younger. I even have a toy better than that one
no they are 2 different spicies
T R3KT
Ehhh did I say something different?No I didn`t.
> means "bigger" or "better" in that case.
Ofc they are 2 different species.
Randy1337 sorry then it is true cus raptor is like only 2m long xD
T R3KT
Yep :-)
“We’ll cover Velociraptor eventually.”
They end up doing it 5 years later.
Yes
About the note at 10:46 the term foreleg can and now does typically mean the foremost extension of a leg. Because of the ever changing nature of English it no longer is used to describe a four legged critter. Thank God cause that was archaic as hell
I love the creative ways they prevent these toys and how Steve try so hard not crack up.
Can't really remember the exact reason but in my childhood this was my favorite dinosaur, I know I had 2 of them from Dinoriders which might have been the influence.
Now a day with all the talk about feathers on dinosaurs and dinosaur sounds, One bird I that makes me think of "raptors" is the Magpie. (Long tail, feather color, the sounds that they make, intelligence and maybe even pack like structure)
There is another reason deinonychus was confused with Velociraptor in jurassic park. Crichton mixed up his sources for his book, making deinonychus velociraptor arthirropus.
Deinonychus is in the same family of velicoraptor
Not exactly. Crichton actually knew that his velociraptors were deinonychuses, and its mentioned in the dialogue between characters _within_ the book itself. They (inGen) chose to use velociraptor because it was more viscous sounding.
I think also because its much easier to say aswell
He never mixed up his sources lmfao. Deinonychus Arthirropus was also called Velociraptor Arthirropus. In the books, its directly adressed why the raptors are so large and are called raptors instead of Deinonychus. Just read the book or watch a video on it, but get something straight. Crichton did not mess up his sources
The Creator And it used to literally be called Velociraptor antirrhopus until it was given its own name but technically that's still inaccurate
It’s actually true that it was based by this, the author of jurassic Park had professionals help him model them after deinonychus
I'd love to hear about Utahraptor, they're my favorite.
Yay! Haha just saw this and kind of got hyped and excited when you mentioned my name! Thanks for making the video man! :) Btw, you said deeman correctly but for 'gamez' its just the word games :P
d_won1 ok
I got here looking for the doom metal band Deinonychus, I have no interest in Dinosaurs but this guy is so interesting I ended up watching the whole thing, the background music is so well selected for the video it's mind blowing.
Deinonychus is a fantastic Doom Metal band name
Amazing! My son and I are watching this with mouths open. It is criminal that our toys are wrong. We will watch again tomorrow.
Honestly, when I draw a sort-of crest on a Deinonychus, it's really just artistic-liberaty. When i draw dinosaurs I try to keep it realistic, but a flat, pigeon-like head looks to bland IMO
yee
ThisIsNotHarvey yee
When I draw dinosaurs, I make sure to make crests and colorful scales/feathers for males.
The flat, bland heads are for females
Fantastic episode. Can't wait to get to the newer ones.
the opposite of hypertrophy would be hypotrophy. The two prefixes are used opposite of each other in instances where there is a scalar difference between an above position and a below position. Sometimes also used to describe size. I think the a- prefix doesn't have an opposite, it just negates what it comes before, so the opposite of atrophy should be trophy, which, if hypertrophy is overgrowth and hypotrophy is undergrowth, then trophy could mean the presence of a grown body part in the first place. Which would mean atrophy should mean the complete loss of a body part, but english isn't a constructed language lol
Who pauses when the corrected toy is finished and says "Ding dong!" to lock that image in one's head?
I would love to see you do a Spinosaurid! They're my favorite dinosaurs.
THAT INTRO WAS SICK
Wait, so feather-bearing deinonychus reconstructions were being made as early as the 80s? And Jurassic Park still somehow ended up making them a bunch of baldies, huh.
I gotta agree with everyone! This series rocks! Do Spinosaurs!
I feel like saying that it had a tail fan because Microraptor had one is like saying a Lynx must have a mane, because you found a Lion with the mane preserved. There's been some serious over-correction in giving _every_ dinosaur flamboyant feathers just because they were far more bird-like than people once supposed.
I'm kinda confused why people dont want feathery giant birds, I mean imagine the floof!!
I love how he said its hands are pretty accurate because they are faced inwards, unlike in some movies and ark. Simply because he specifically mentioned ark, one of the most inaccurate modern dinosaur games. That just made me laugh because it is so popular and he specifically mentions it rather than in "video games". I found this funny, oh and please do a video on me!
I prefer The Isle. Get to be a Carno.
What evs
Dako I know Im late but considering the raptor in ark is a fucking UTAHRAPTOR, yeah, id say its a kinda inaccurate representation of an animal it is not. And Im pretty sure he said art not ark. And for the most part ark is realistic and accurate, aside from the giganotosaurus being bigger than the trex, even though in real life they were pretty closely sized. What else is inaccurate about ark.
The devs of Ark actually did their research and decided to screw it over in favor of rule of cool and other stuff.
No, Ark is not very accurate whatsoever. Even though their raptor is based on Utahraptor, it is still extremely inaccurate.
I still like the game, and the developers _know_ that its not accurate. The game is meant to be fun and cool, not accurate and educational, and they 100% know this. They tend to grossly exaggerate size, not just on the giganotosaurus but other animals as well. And they tend to exaggerate features as well, to make them stand out from each other more. For example, Kaprosuchus, being a crocodillian, probably couldn't leap 200 feat horizontally. But they needed it to stand out from the sarcosuchus, so they just posted that onto it.
YAY! :D a new one! I LOVE these cause they teach me so much about Dinosaurs. You should do a episode with a triceratops!
0:52 who the hell thought THAT looked like a Deinonychus?!
Jenny Hart nobody
Yeah right that is a thicc boi
I had the exact same pronunciation issue with Dinonychus. Similarly until relatively recently:
PA-ra-SAUR-oh-LOW-fuss (Parasaurolophus)
seh-LOFF-ehsis (Coelophysis)
On pronunciation - My biology teacher told us what her professor taught her: "Whoever pronounces it the loudest and most confident is correct."
We are mashing Greek, Latin, German, Chinese, other languages, and proper nouns together. There is no way to "properly" pronounce these names.
That deinonychus toy looks like what would happen if Robert Bakker's deinonychus depiction had sex with a hybrid between an iguanadon and one of those vaguely t-rex like "dinosaurs" from old children's books/cartoons, had a kid with it and overfed it, then it grew up living in unbearable agony
Man part of me wants to send you what I consider one of the worst examples of a velociraptor toy I have ever found. It not only suffers from the usual problems (like no feathers and wrong arm positions etc) but I am thinking it is a recycled sculpt of some kind. This velociraptor toy has the head of a herbivore. It has a beaked mouth with no teeth and cheeks. Makes me think of really old terrible iguanadon reconstructions and I wouldn't have guessed it was a velociraptor if it wasn't for the toe claw and the text on the belly claiming that is what it's suppose to be. (it should be noted this toy has the date of 2000)
I think I may have 3 of the animals you are talking about , mine are literally an iguanodon with raptor feet, I cannot tell what it is as it has no name and is around 1 centimetre long it is brown in colour with darker brown stripes. It is also on four leger , as if it was meant to be an iguanodon but with raptor toes
I also have this one ( mine is a really dark blue almost black)
I also have one like that it came in a set with an ankylosaurus that had a very triangular head from the dorsal view, tons of spikes on the front and almost no club on its tail
+The winged Porpoise THAT'S IT THAT'S THE ONE I HAVE!!!
+Isaac Dickson did it come with other dinosaurs and a big mountain and palm trees
I HAD THAT SAME TOY IN MY DINOSAUR COLLECTION AS A KID AND IT WAS MY FAVORITE ONE
I know I'm a million years late but I always have to comment when it comes up... the Jurassic Park raptors were in fact based on Utahraptor. In one of the features on the DVD set I have they talk about how they hesitated to make the raptors as big as they did because they had no precedent for a dromeosaur of that size. However, WHILE THEY WERE FILMING Utahraptor was dug up and one of the archaeologists on that team called up the consultants for the film and they then went forward in making it as big as they did. Utahraptor wasn't described officially until later, but that doesn't mean the community wasn't aware of it.
I have an original 1978 national geographic magazine with a large segment on his thoughts on deinonychus. It features a drawing that is way ahead of its time for an animal discovered in the 60s. I mean its not feathered but its a really good image of the animal.
Hi! Really good videos! I was wondering if you could make a Velociraptor one. Keep up the good work
For a behind-the-scenes look at why they went with Velociraptor for Jurassic Park I recommend reading the intro to Raptor Red (if you haven't already).
I never knew dinosaurs inspired such intense nerdiness. Hell, why not? They lived on an ancient version of Earth and neither will never occur in nature again.
The k'nex Dinosaur is like Neptr from Adventure Time! Giving Steve a hug like "I love you, creator"
Your amazing, best art reference if listened to yet. Your field of study helps my hobby. =) thank you for all of your videos!
That toy (the sorta redish purple one) I had it as a kid I always thought it was a utahraptor
0:30 please, tell me where you got that.
I'm so amazed you didn't know the pronunciation of Deinonychus. By far my fave dino and fave dino name.
The English Y has many origins. One is the Greek letter Ypsilon, which was pronounced Ü and is the precursor of the Latin V, which in turn gave birth to U and W. The Romans were too lazy to write the stem apparently.
In the past the Greek Y has often been pronounced U. For example in the Mother Goose rhyme, "Polly put the kettle on/ Sukey took it off again", Sukey could also be spelled Psyche.
That toy is particularly awful. It's very satisfying to see all the corrections animated at the end.
The pronunciation of Deinonychus makes sense. As -onychus comes from the same root word as -onyx (like Baryonyx)
Jurassic Park was the best (at the time) special effects dinosaur movie ever. For myself, while watching it, I was very perturbed by the gross amount of inaccuracies. However, it spurred a huge amount of interest in dinosaurs which helped activate the public awareness and scientific curiosity.
Do you think you could do an episode on ammosaurus and anchisaurus as there is debate on whether or not they are the same dinosaurs.... I'd be curious to see you compare the two. Thanx Steve! Keep up the awesome vids!
Dude
you need to make dinosaur toys.
5:39 I believe that rahonavis is the smallest dromaeasaurus we know of
Dilophosaurus has always been my favorite dinosaur, it would be cool to see a video on that one!
We talked about that one for Episode 5!
ah, I didn't see that, I'll have to go watch it :D
me when I see the deinonychus: BOI WHAT IS THAT
I remember having this exact toy as a kid
Before you do the Velociraptor episode I think you could also mention Achillobator as an inspiration for the Jurassic Park raptors. It was from Mongolia, and believed to be a Velociraptor species before it was classified in 1999. It was also similar size to Deinonychus.
Ezekiel O'Callaghan I only mention Jurassic Park because, for a large segment of the population, those films are the only point of contact with dinosaurs. A lot of people might not know what a _Deinonychus_ or _Achillobator_ was, but they recognize a raptor.
That said: yes, we should definitely cover how the raptor misconception came about.
i saw something that suggested that the big claw on the foot might have been used to climb trees, as opposed to tearing apart prey. What do we think about that?
Oh, so that toy dinosaur I had was a Deinonychus
Deinonychus 50% feathered 50% scales
Uh. 6;56 What if they both evolved from it rather then the other way around?
Enjoy this show so much!
2018 here checking in. I love these videos. I hope Steven eventually learns the word "genera". It's pronounced jĕn'ə-rə gen-er-a. "Genre" is similar but different.
That K-nex dinosaur was freaking cool!
I have been trying my hand at dromaeosaurid restorations for quite some time now. I still almost always get something wrong. You clarified that the feathers are attached to the second finger, but I have some issues with that.
How long were the feathers on that finger? It seems impractical to have long feathers on an instrument used to subdue prey. Were all three fingers free to move? If so, the feathers on them would move, too, which would be more than a bit clumsy if the feathers were long. It seems weird to put long, fragile feathers on an instrument used to kill prey.
One night about fifteen years ago, my pet bird got frightened in the night and landed hard on his tail. He lost several feathers and damaged one of the follicles. His tail will never have a complete set of feathers again. And that was just from a hard landing. Think of the thrashing that would happen while a large dromaeosaur struggled to subdue prey. Long feathers on fingers would be a definite impediment.
So perhaps the feathers on the hands and fingers should be small protofeathers rather than a shafted feather with barbs. Or perhaps the hands and fingers should be entirely bare. Would a dinosaur's bare hands still have scales passed down from reptilian ancestors or would the skin be more akin to the bare skin found on turkeys and vultures?
Quill knobs found on the ulnae of _Velociraptor_ skeletons suggest long feathers protruded from the arm, but I'm thinking these should _not_ extend to the hands. The long fingers on _Deinonychus_ look like weapons, not structures to support long, fragile feathers.
If you look at the anatomy of a bird, the longest flight feathers are on the hand and the remainder are on the ulna. The humerus does not support any flight feathers. When I look at restorations of feathered dinos on Wikipedia and elsewhere, I see the same arrangement as that of birds: long feathers on the hands and fingers. I've used that arrangement myself, but it really doesn't make sense if the larger dromaeosaurids used their long fingers and claws to subdue prey. TBH, I think only the ulna should have a few longer feathers for display, leaving the hands either bare or with smaller protofeathers that would not get in the way. Putting an entire "wing" on the hands and fingers of the larger dromaeosaurids seems contrary to their purpose.
One other thing: _Microraptor_ obviously had long flight feathers on its hands and fingers. Could it bend its fingers? If so, that would probably be counterproductive to gliding. Is it possible that the second and third fingers were fused inside the integument to provide a more rigid structure for the flight feathers?
I'm wondering what paleontologists have to say about this issue.
Thanks.
Well, high-five for feathered paleoart!
Have you read Martyniuk's blog post breaking down the Senter (2006) & Sullivan (2010) articles about forelimb function? [dinogoss 2011_05_01] What about Dr. Hone's post about Microraptor's hand feathers? [archosaurmusings 2010/03/04] (I would link you properly but RUclips doesn't let me put links in comments.)
As for your feathered forearm but fuzzy and/or scaly hand proposition...it doesn't _contradict_ any evidence I've seen. Like, the 'primitive' condition for dromeosaurs' feet would've been pennaceous feathers, yet we restore them with fluff or scutes, so unless we get direct evidence proving primaries I suppose there's no reason _not_ to restore them that way.
That said, if their arm feathers served some purpose other than display, suppressing the expression of pennaceous feathers on the fingers might've been more trouble than it was worth. (Admittedly, if they were used primarily to push air around we'd probably see quill knobs on the larger animals). You might be underestimating the strength & flexibility of feathers, while overestimating their length relative to the fingers, as well as the encumbrance they would represent in combat & predation.
It's good that you're thinking about function & behavior when restoring dinosaur integument, though! Keep that up.
As far as _Microraptor's_ fingers, I don't know enough about those critters to comment one way or the other.
Steven Bellettini No, I haven't read those papers, but I will Google the titles. I want to give you a longer answer. I didn't see your full comment because I had my RUclips "herp derp" extension enabled for use on videos where people are behaving like idiots. XD Your video doesn't fall under that category, thankfully. I'll get back to you after some study and thanks for your thoughtful reply.
Now that the actual look of Deinocheirus is pretty settled (badly beating our wildest imagination or most of them) will you do an episode on it eventually?
do you need to send in real dinosaur toys to him i have all your favorite dinosaurs
Benjamin TRex but i don't have archyarchorex
As a child, all the dinosaur books I read had the dumb shambling lump stumbling around swamps idea of dinosaurs. Reading Bakker's Dinosaur Heresies was like somebody switched the light on.
So I've been curious for a while... Have you seen the new Beasts of the Mesozoic Raptor figures? They are labelled as being the most scientifically accurate dinosaur toys out there. I wonder if you've seen them and had any thoughts on them.
This toy is still sold in the Dollar Tree I work at and I cry a little inside whenever someone buys it.
P.S. I also said DInoNYchus for the first few decades of my life. I feel your pain.
it is interesting that we have avian scales on ornithiscians
That toy is saying "Hello fellow deinonychus"
Just some comments on the Jurassic Park version of these animals. Crichton based his animal on the Deinonychus, but he named them Velociraptor because it sounded "cooler", he has publicly stated this. It's not a mistake, he just decided to do it.
His "velociraptors" are also incredibly powerful, what you see in the movies is toned down compared to the novel:
Cheetah speed.
Hyena-like bit-force, shown to be able to bite through steel wire.
Chimpanzee intelligence, possibly a bit smarter.
In one scene they are shown to do a vertical jump of 3 meters.
They have some kind of weird decentralized nervous system (All the dino's), Muldoon uses a rocket-propelled grenade to take down a raptor since firearms aren't reliable.
Chameleon-like camouflage, one raptor is stated to change its skin color to blend in.
Gender-swapping.
Social group animals.
Pack-hunting behavior (Very advanced and rare trait).
Migratory behavior, including them waiting for a boat to dock so they can board it.
The JP T-rex is similarly overpowered.
Henry Wu also states that he was so focused on results that he used DNA from whatever he had on hand to create the dinosaurs, he is also incapable of naming any of them. This could explain some of the strange traits of the "dinosaurs" in jurassic park, they alluded to this in Jurassic World.
*+ The winged Porpoise* Sorry! I learned this stuff from written sources, rather than lectures or videos, so there are a lot of words I've never actually heard out loud. For example, how do you actually pronounce jugal? Zhoo-gull? Joo-gaul?
Fortunately our viewers are both helpful and forgiving when it comes to my idiosyncratic enunciation.
We definitely forgive you, Steven! It's part of the thrills and perils of self-teaching. ;D
That makes sense and I noticed you don't know how to do the blue reply thing at the beginning which I as well don't know how to do that which is annoying when there are about 15 people replying to a comment (mainly on dinosaur videos which have more debates than others.)
lol the way you use your hands is so nerdy it's great
Hey, I had that toy (not that specifically but one exactly like it)
Because of Jurassic Park, I thought it was a Velociraptor
"The Hot-Blooded Dinosaurs" by Adrian J Desmond is a great read.