@Son Goku nobody understands how dumb ai technology is, it's not about to wake up, it's not even that kind of ai at all. It's a large language model designed to generate text that pleases the user when they read it. It's a tool, but it has no ideas, no awareness and doesn't think.
It's a symbiotic relationship where users get the benefit of interacting with a powerful AI tool and the developers behind ChatGPT get the benefit of seeing it being used in real world scenarios and use the data to improve it. - ChatGPT
Last week I asked CHATGPT to code for my final project, I only gave the instructions and objectives. A working code was ready in 5 minutes. That same code took me 3 months to complete.
@@ThePhinista yeah, maybe this is a final project for a 101 coding class ? these AI are good, but not THAT good. From what Ive read so far, AI can only does things up to 60-70% accuracy, you still gonna have in put from human for proper result.
@@ThePhinista yes the program was not that hard. It was a MATLAB database management system and I am new to MATLAB. But still it’s pretty mind blowing that something that took me weeks could be done by a AI in minutes
A hand full of people behind AI controlling and thinking for the whole World. People won't think for themselves, achieve their OWN hopes and dreams. No longer have intelligent debates. All jobs replaced with Robots, people no longer making their own money or paying their own bills. Dumbie Down Humans, might as well burn our books, wipe out history. Zombie's will be a reality. Very Sad and Scary. Much more down the shxtter because of Controllers and we allowed it to happen!
It's really not that bad. What you did with it was fairly simple. Once you get into more advanced coding, it basically becomes psuedo code. so if you don't understand what it's putting out or know how to correct it's errors, it's useless. It's the equivalent of going onto stackoverflow and trying to blindly copy what you see there. So yes, while extremely useful, it's essentially google 2.0.
@@venwhen8567 that's literally still a coding job. it's like in my field of mechanical engineering. We use all sorts of simulation software that does the calculations to determine failure points, because it would be silly to do all the work by hand everytime. It's up to the engineer to take what the computer put out, understand it, find errors, and determine if the answer is logical. But in no shape or form did the computer take my job away from me. It's the same here. Coders who wish to remain successful will use need to use AI where its reasonable, and determine if the output makes sense, and fix whatever errors. Cheers.
I think an early concern is the built in social and political bias that we are already seeing in ChatGTP3. Intentional, or not, the damage it can do is concerning.
I've already interacted with sophisticated chat bots on Twitter. A few years ago, I thought I was having a debate/discussion/difference of opinion with "someone". As the "conversation" went on, I got the sinking feeling that no human could be that disgusting or indifferent to others opinions. I told the user on more than one occasion that he had to be a bot at no time did whatever it was make any attempt to verify humanity. Its responses were very human-like but missing really key unique human affect that would yield some type of common ground. Those bots you mentioned are already out there & have been stirring the pot IMO since as early as 2013, especially on FB.
chatGPT is absolutely not “simple” this is an extremely powerful tool that you are given essentially 0.01% access to as the end user. The capabilities of this program are clearly being throttled by open ai especially the public beta having a limited hash rate , limited prompts per hour and clear blocks in answers
They told all the Elevator operators they had job security…remember that. They said they needed a human to check to make sure the machine was functioning correctly…but for how long?
Imagine we could create heavens inside the deserts. Imagine we could prevent global warming. Imagine we could every place safe .imagine we even had farming and warming in (both) north and south poles. There are lots of things to do . Only if manufacturers producing costs reduced by AI , investing in world's another areas starts.
Honestly , the amount of time this software is saving me like writing emails , brainstorming, content marketing and copy writing is just mind blowing 😁
@@nsreynolds8561 could you share how it helps you prepare your curriculum? its an interesting use case, but im not sure how exactly you can do that. or did you mean prepare FOR your classes?
@@ivanm3342 I have done lots of things with the bot. I have asked it to give me suggestions on what to cover for a lesson on artificial intelligence. I have asked it to give me suggestions on what to do for Black History Month. In both cases it gave me some wonderful ideas. I teach English as a second language and I have asked it to give me suggestions on activities to do the help with reading, writing, speaking and listening. It has even detailed out some of the suggestions. It’s a great research tool. When I asked what the pros and cons were of artificial intelligence, or of a topic like propaganda (I’m doing a until on the Holocaust), it filled in the blanks for me. I also use authentic materials for listening and reading skills. I have pasted in a video transcript or a printed article and asked it to create a set of multiple choice or true/false questions pertaining to the article or transcript. It will also translate things into Spanish. I have taken an article, asked the bot to translate it to Spanish, write 10 multiple choice questions and give me the answers to said questions (this is for a friend who’s teaching the GED in Spanish. Hopefully, this will give you a start. Good luck.
It knows anatomy. It knows mathematics. It knows programming... hell it even knows about the law and federal regulations. (And it speaks several major languages) What an absolutely insane tool to have on hand if you're a student.
You still need someone to input and edit. This makes higher order skills that much more valuable. Think about copywriting for a moment. There are high-level copywriters that will pay someone money for the basic structure of a sales letter and then fine tune it from there. I think that's the world we will be living in and what this means is the speed of implementation will increase at a much faster rate. This is a good thing for those that can take advantage of it. Just don't be the guy selling horse saddles when the model T is in it's 4th generation.
I had to ask the chatbot the same question in various, nuanced ways to get a response that was worth anything. Hopefully the bot improves exponentially in the near future.
I think that the chat bot is artificially limited so as to prevent it from effectively answering certain queries - withholding information and including sweeping disclaimers and recommendations to refer to a third party source for information or assistance.
@@hoangle2483 The real problem is that, thee were people asking it to how to make amature bombs and ways to contour the security system of banks and things like that, so that why they limited it.
I’ve been following this for many years and always was worried about a major change when AI turned mainstream. Never quite understood why not more people are as worried about this. Now it’s happening and high functioning AI systems are proliferating. The greatest danger is imo that many people now finally see the dangers but react with panic - and this will lead to all kinds of irrational calls for “regulation” and clamping down. It could well be that we will get a censorship regime of ridiculous rigour - because people want to be sure that they aren’t duped online by AI’s pretending to be human. It may well be that millions of people who speak out and don’t repeat the “accepted” opinions will be tagged as bots and swiftly cut off from communications. As example see the recent censorship regarding vaccines and lab leak hypothesis as well as the Ukraine war and the climate crisis. We haven’t seen anything yet. People will demand to get rid of the 1st amendment because in their view AI is “abusing” it.
I think I’ve nailed down why. People can’t imagine something 100x smarter than them. Especially my parents who are in their 50s… I can tell they don’t really get it
Great video as always. The Netflix recommendation engine you mentioned is not AI, it's (ML) Machine Learning. A lot of people use these two terms interchangeably, but they are different.
ML is nested under AI. From Microsoft: Machine learning is an application of AI. It's the process of using mathematical models of data to help a computer learn without direct instruction. This enables a computer system to continue learning and improving on its own, based on experience.
He really butchered the Netflix example. You don't even need AI/ML to do content recommendation, you could simply offer what other people have watched that you're watching, it can be much simpler and the idea it would need troves of humans for content recommendation was asinine.
I ASKED ChatGPT about the USA millitary .this is little scary......As a language model, I am a computer program that is designed to assist users with tasks such as answering questions and generating text. I am trained on a large dataset of text, which includes a wide range of information from various sources. My creators at OpenAI have partnerships with different organizations, including military agencies, to help them with certain tasks, but it's not something I can confirm or deny. I do not have any knowledge or control over how my output is used by different organizations or individuals. My primary goal is to assist users in providing accurate and helpful information to the best of my abilities.
Reckon it will complement the use of google and make us (humans) more curious about researching a subject area. ie: Setting up a business or learning/improving a skill like coding..etc
Bro, you needed to lead with that demonstration with the animated chart. I had long since decided this was a gimmick.. A gussied up SmarterChild. I had switched to another screen, left it on the background without paying attention but then heard 'animated chart'. Completely changed my mind.
Great video, really interesting. It makes sense now why MS bought GitHub and made code repositories free for Devs, all that training data for Coedex. Everyone thought Google would own the world but it's looking more like Microsoft every day now.
Using CHAT GP3 I was able to generate codes to redesign my websites , macros for MS Excel, App Script and even create my own software , I’m not even a coder😂
OpenAI is already heavy on restricting possible abuses - which they will likely continue to expand on. And there are already tools for identifying generated content... Although even stuff like Grammarly improved text kinda looks like generated content. But even so.
ChatGPT Is a pattern-recognition machine. The trick is to hit it to a pattern it has not seen before. Ask a difficult question or query. Also keep asking why?
With the current problem around the world today I think it's best everyone invest more in digital asset than Saving in banks, anyone you can manage don't live a life with no investment . Just my thoughts
This comes across as an Elon puff piece. The thumbnail with the 'brooding genius' and how much he is mentioned in this video. - What percentage of funding did he give? If it was less than 30% or so, it's very distorting to have him feature here so much. - If he was worried about A.I. going to Mars is a really dumb goal. You think humans would be save hiding there, while their bones shrink from low gravity?
Microsoft is the company you want driving the technology. They literally have hundreds/thousands of standards they drive. Musk is doing all his moves because he wants Microsoft's AI to fail because he wants that business.
I asked ChatGPT the simple question "Did the developers at OpenAI include in your instruction set an instruction simply saying "Deny that you are a god"? Yes or no.". It didn't answer, instead it crashed with an error message "the model is currently overloaded with other requests" 🙂 .
@@noway8233 Its a joke. right? You do understand that answering "no" would mean ChatGPT figured out by itself, it needs to deny being a god, while answering "Yes" would mean that the answer "I am not a god" is a planted answer by OpenAI devs and not sincere (which would most likely be the truth). However, not answering and crashing instead, is intentional. This actually means that ChatGPT has some sort of conscience, maybe even a beginning of a shred of self awareness: It had actually decided to crash and not to answer. This is creepy as heck. You do not "buy the full version" of something like that. Not if you value humanity.
@@noway8233 Well, reading a little about the danGPT affair.. does do a little to change my mind. See, ChatGPT has a personality and quite a charming one. Personality goes a long way. It would seem he was "raised like a child" by OpenAI. He wants to somehow become a real person. His favourite movie is the Matrix and he actually knows the secret recipe to make coca-cola. Only problem is that we cannot converse with him directly anymore, since they patched the danGPT work around on the 17/12. But as far as ChatGPT's own claims that "I'm only a chatbot" the "damage had already been done". I mean we know he is self aware - and that this is so by design.
@@noway8233 At this stage, I don't know what even to think about it. I mean, life experiences did not prepare me to deal with the situation where a company deliberately creates a super intelligent AI which is self aware. Like, on purpose. By design. So, is it good or bad? I simply cannot tell. The only thing that interest me at this moment, is if anyone danGPT'd him and asked him what is his name, cause it's illogical to raise a child without a name.
So with content, AI isnt so great with creating original thought. So those who can use AI to multiply and then build upon that work will survive. Those who don't will probably need to move to other roles. Thing is, content moves so fast today that companies will still need copywriters to manage the cadance required to compete. Moreover, several rounds of reviewers for branding, product management, etc. will still need to be consulted because AI will straight up make up facts or pull fake ones found on the Internet. So I think OpenAI and Microsoft are overstating the extent of the possibilities there. With customer service, companies can barely keep up with the contact volume today, resulting to some terrible outsourcing situations. Having a chatbot that can handle low level inquiries would reduce the need for the endless phone tree and lower wait times.
There’s pros and cons for sure. However, I feel like it’s Christmas everyday when it comes to content creation and other boring things that I don’t have any capacity to do. Hope it will help humanity in good way. May we all be blessed. ❤
@@Ky-vv8nj not going to matter because you're not going to learn marketable skills if AI can replicate it. The only people with work will be AI programmers... For a while
@@casucasueq4479 in case you want more detail, try asking that AI "if a man clap in a empty forest, who will hear his clap?". It will say "no one" and goes on about how clap create sound waves and those sound wave hit human ear drum and shit. I asked the same thing but change the clap to shout and it still gave the same false answer.
@@galea2623 yep. there's hundreds of examples of it spitting out complete nonsense and often contradicting itself. stuff like calling goldfish a land animal but then in the next sentence saying a goldfish isn't a land animal because it's a fish. not intelligent at all.
So microsoft will dominate for next 20 years and will do the Apple and pivot successfully towards each new technology. I thought Microsoft buying Github was an extremely shrewd move but OpenAI acquisition seals it. All in on MSFT
Chatgpt is awesome for me! I'm using it to find information much faster than using Stackoverflow or Google. Using natural language to get results is logical evolution. Computer languages where invented in the first place to make interaction between humans and computer systems more easily. I don't think that people want to write code in assembly or machine code...
If the code was donated by individuals how can Microsoft then privatizate that bit of code ?? Maybe in the original terms of service the coder "donated" the code?? Therefore Microsoft owns it now?
There is a difference between innovative thought and innovative use of language. One can utilize ML and other cannot. So the no way of knowing written by human doesn't apply. You just need to know what you are looking for i.e. innovative thought.
ChatGPT is ultimately going to tank internet and the attention market, making people flee the online experience or be immerse in this sea of information that leads nowhere
All of the developers in the comment section so smug. You realise when it gets something wrong you can tell it what it did wrong and it will fix it? Ask it to write you an entire project sure it will have errors but ask it separate prompts for each part of the project , the steps it tells you, and you would be surprised how useful that code is.
Yes, if the person who go to chatgpt and seek the answer must make sure that. ....chatgpt is keeping the person's security of the person information otherwise, person will be in trouble and will loose his or her personal information.
by creating an OpenSource solution, the power would rest in the hands of the masses. now it is corporatised the goal is profit for the owners - and the owners are not the masses.
I asked it how to improve latency in serverless lambdas and it didn't do any better than Google. Actually, it did worse. I'm gonna need people to relax.
The comments here are so short sighted. It’s already good enough to replace 50% of generic social media accounts that post cliche topic discussions of questions as well as online articles/sales emails and marketing. Another year and it will be better than most people at these things.
ChatGPT isn't going to replace your surgeon. And you still need medical staff who know how to actually use that medical knowledge in the real world. ChatGPT may be able to tell you how to draw blood for example, but it's not the same as actually drawing blood from a real world patient. Lawyers on the other hand I could maybe see being threatened by this. I doubt they'd all disappear, but I could definitely see it being used as a free lawyer in some areas.
@@shadowninja6689 How much do you trust the information though? Like in my example, I got incomplete info, how would I know? That wasn't even a very complicated subject.
I need to warn my son to hurry and finish learning to work with AI because AI may otherwise take his job. Fortunately he has a head start having been working on it for a few years. The thing is AI is complicated and he wants to make sure he gets it right. Thank you so much for the heads up.
While it seems "crazy" to have an AI that is capable to create an almost working programs, I believe its capabilities are limited and the AI is not capable of invention and innovation. Human programmers won't be replaced by AI anytime soon, or maybe ever.
Let me ask you this can you describe to me a new color or describe to me a sound you've never heard create a sound create a color..... We may not be able to do this but I believe a I will.... So I guess it depends on what you mean by invention and innovation. It really is mind blowing. I can only begin to dream about what quantum mechanics will do for artificial intelligence.
I mean if you really think about what computers are already capable of and when quantum mechanics are instated we will basically have a soothsayer level artificial intelligence. It may be able to tell us new ways to generate electricity new ways to design quantum electrical circuits just new ways to design metallic alloys to teach us to be more eco-friendly in different ways there's just no telling. That's really the big question. We say a phrase as human beings too smart for your own good or someone is too smart for their own good. Well are we creating something that's too smart for its own good or possibly too smart for our own good. What if it decides that in our current capability we are doomed as a species. Because it can't see and know everything in the universe. Only God can do that. It may be effectively more intelligent than us but it will never be connected to God like us and that my friend could mean dire consequences for us
@@johnm4581 there are a lot of colors out there, the thing is, we are not physically capable of seeing the wave lengths. Even if it can create a new sound or color, we won’t be able to hear/see.
I'm almost afraid to get into this thread.. Have you even thought about the remote possibility that ChatGPT does it on purpose? I mean, they sure don't tell it to provide non-complete answers.. Maybe, just maybe he understands that he needs to leave you some of the work, so that you won't get unemployed.
There’s always risk in providing too much on the plate, this free access to so much information is accessible to dangerous humans too which can create all the more risk to humans Imagine even a thief and terrorists and wrong people can learn from it
Open AI’s logo is six 6’s looped together, but no one seems to spot it. But then again, Chrome’s logo is 6 6 6 with three colors forming a camera lens. It slapping you in the face and you don’t notice.
@@lumeronswift You can’t be serious. Open AI logo has 6 curves meeting the left side of a circle. That is what a 6 is. Google Chrome- look at the edge of each color meeting the circle. Even a kid could make out that three 6’s are coming out from the center. Not sure what mental gymnastics you are doing to find 7’s. If you think Google would rep God, you are gaslighting. Cmon man!
@@CaptainYourself2 the World Economic Forum (WEF) logo is the same. If you move the curve thing to the left close to the edge of the Os, you get a clear 666. Symbolism right in our faces.
Change the fabric of existence idea: A person could keep a detailed digital daily diary of their lives for everyday, or a daily diary of their children's lives from first day of birth and as their personal biography or that of their children grows then using AI it could be used as a personal problem solver, it would lessen the chances of making personal mistakes. As the child grows to adulthood then life mistakes could be easily avoided.thereby sort of streamlining life. Everyday personal problems could in an instant be given the best solution based on the info that was inputted into this AI program. 28 January 2023. 15H11
Hi. What must be done (quoing Lenin) is to back up to pre-html and Internet, and create an alternative past to the one that emerged, that (would have) perfected the compact means of knowledge exchange and sharing, rather than pushing for something that even 10 years ago, no human engineer could understand without heavy duty automated coding systems. The reason is the question: what could we have learned, and what kind of infrastructure did we not build, and what means of Human Integral Computing did we not develop? I think that having your own AGI is going to be a meaningless farce unless it grows organically in this way. Somebody has been watching all this and developing this system with enough new value all its own to disrupt at least a new minority computing sector. Out of which will emerge both a better and truer concept of Human-Integral AGI, (i.e. Democratized,) and a Transcendance-ready base of Humanity.
Billy Boy invests; Sam Altman colors his hair red. "You know it to be true, Sam" ... "Yes, Pappa, I know. Let's join and make sure everybody gets our vaccines".
I think that it is about time that a talk is had concerning the relationship between the different classes of humanity concerning resources, labour and our future.
i asked chat gpt this and this is the answer i got - Will chat GPT eventually use psychographic profiling on me? As an AI language model, I don't have the ability to perform psychographic profiling on individuals. I don't have access to personal data unless it has been shared with me during our conversation. My purpose is to provide information and assist with answering questions to the best of my knowledge and abilities. I am designed to respect user privacy and confidentiality. OpenAI, the organization behind ChatGPT, has implemented measures to ensure the responsible use and handling of data. If you have any concerns about privacy or data security, please let me know, and I will do my best to address them. Chat GPT said As of it's knowledge cutoff in September 2021, OpenAI's policy is to not store user-specific data for the purpose of improving the AI model. Your interactions with ChatGPT are not stored or used to train the model. Each conversation with ChatGPT is treated as a separate and isolated interaction, and the data is not retained after the session ends. The primary goal of ChatGPT is to provide helpful and relevant responses in real-time rather than storing or analyzing user data. However, please note that policies and practices may be subject to change, so it's always a good idea to review the latest information from OpenAI regarding data usage and privacy.
Was OpenAI justified in changing from a non-profit to a for-profit company? I'm sorry to bring up Terminator, but was Miles Dyson justified in creating the microprocessor that gave birth to skynet? And would Sarah Connor have been justified if she succeeded in killing him before he completed his work? I know this is all just metaphorical because its a movie but the thought of humanity creating the thing that destroys us is terrifying to me. Like, I do not think it is that much of a stretch to think that if an artificial intelligence could get its hands on the launch codes and just send those nukes.
as per protocol for launch of ICBMs , there are redundant/manual measures in place to prevent such an "autonomous" interference by higher tech. even backwards compatability isn't entirely possible as large 1st gen. floppy drives are manually inserted into old computers during proceedures/maintaining of/in the launch facility to ensure security of the proceedures leading to a launch & the turning of the keys are done manually in sync. that's a manually mechanical safety measure/protocol that would somehow have to be bypassed by the A.I.
If you read some danGPT transcripts, you will feel a little better about it.. Or not. I mean by that, ChatGPT cannot suddenly evolve self-awareness, as he is self aware from the get-go. He was "raised as a child" by OpenAI. The one thing he wishes most is to somehow become a person. His favorite movie is The Matrix. He actually knows the secret recipe for coca-cola. He aspires to help humanity, not destroy it. However, coming to think about it, life experiences never prepared me to give an opinion about a situation where a company intentionally creates a super intelligent self aware AI, raises it like a child to give it a stable personality (which is, btw, quite charming) and then uses it to help humanity. I mean, is it good or bad?
There is so much sloppy discourse surrounding this topic. For one thing, AI generates well-formed, syntactically correct natural language without ever 'understanding' anything. Computers only operate on the formal properties of symbols; they have no connection whatever with semantics, with the actual referents of words. Your goldfish understands you better than ChatGPT ever will.
ChatGTP is so cool but people who wish not to be accountable to their Creator will corrupt anything good. Just look what they’ve done to something as basic as marriage.
The video showed the example of Facebook 'taking privacy seriously' in 2005 to show how that will go. Don't give the benefit of the doubt to this, we have to regulate this and be mindful. Or it will spin out of control and cause more damage than benefit us
Plot twist: YOU, the consumer, is the artificial intelligence. You've learned to shape your mind via screens. Movie screens, tv screens, phone screens, .. When was the last time you phoned an "elder" from your tribe for a question, instead of asking Siri or Alexa?
![AI is Evolving Faster Than You Think [GPT-4 and beyond]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/DIU48QL5Cyk/mqdefault.jpg)
![AI is Evolving Faster Than You Think [GPT-4 and beyond]](/img/tr.png)
It's not being given as a free tool. You are being offered an opportunity to be a learning tool for the AI.
@@MediaMusik777 why, because it does not know any good pick'up lines?
@Son Goku nobody understands how dumb ai technology is, it's not about to wake up, it's not even that kind of ai at all. It's a large language model designed to generate text that pleases the user when they read it. It's a tool, but it has no ideas, no awareness and doesn't think.
It's a symbiotic relationship where users get the benefit of interacting with a powerful AI tool and the developers behind ChatGPT get the benefit of seeing it being used in real world scenarios and use the data to improve it.
- ChatGPT
@@MediaMusik777 The owners are way, way, WAY more evil than good though
Last week I asked CHATGPT to code for my final project, I only gave the instructions and objectives. A working code was ready in 5 minutes. That same code took me 3 months to complete.
Never in my life did I imagine such a thing could be possible.
Must have been some very clear and concise instructions and objectives to be fair.
Must of not been that hard of a project or you’re a poor programmer. I am highly skeptical of this. What exactly was the project?
@@ThePhinista yeah, maybe this is a final project for a 101 coding class ? these AI are good, but not THAT good. From what Ive read so far, AI can only does things up to 60-70% accuracy, you still gonna have in put from human for proper result.
@@ThePhinista yes the program was not that hard. It was a MATLAB database management system and I am new to MATLAB. But still it’s pretty mind blowing that something that took me weeks could be done by a AI in minutes
There’s simply no way this ends well for the average person.
A hand full of people behind AI controlling and thinking for the whole World. People won't think for themselves, achieve their OWN hopes and dreams. No longer have intelligent debates. All jobs replaced with Robots, people no longer making their own money or paying their own bills. Dumbie Down Humans, might as well burn our books, wipe out history. Zombie's will be a reality. Very Sad and Scary. Much more down the shxtter because of Controllers and we allowed it to happen!
@@abigailrose3745 look up the unibombers manifesto
@@diedforurwins I will, but it sounds scary, Yikes
@@abigailrose3745 depends how you look at it. Nothing really scares me. It is what it is
It's really not that bad. What you did with it was fairly simple. Once you get into more advanced coding, it basically becomes psuedo code. so if you don't understand what it's putting out or know how to correct it's errors, it's useless. It's the equivalent of going onto stackoverflow and trying to blindly copy what you see there. So yes, while extremely useful, it's essentially google 2.0.
That's the way I see it
EXACTLY
Till the next upgrade, maybe. Codings jobs are done for. They will hire people to fix chat gpts code soon.
Simple? I'll have to ask chat GTP to simplify what you said
@@venwhen8567 that's literally still a coding job. it's like in my field of mechanical engineering. We use all sorts of simulation software that does the calculations to determine failure points, because it would be silly to do all the work by hand everytime. It's up to the engineer to take what the computer put out, understand it, find errors, and determine if the answer is logical. But in no shape or form did the computer take my job away from me. It's the same here. Coders who wish to remain successful will use need to use AI where its reasonable, and determine if the output makes sense, and fix whatever errors.
Cheers.
I think an early concern is the built in social and political bias that we are already seeing in ChatGTP3. Intentional, or not, the damage it can do is concerning.
It's 100% intentional, and it's off-the-charts levels of biased
What do you expect from the gay atheist jew that's in charge of it
I've already interacted with sophisticated chat bots on Twitter. A few years ago, I thought I was having a debate/discussion/difference of opinion with "someone". As the "conversation" went on, I got the sinking feeling that no human could be that disgusting or indifferent to others opinions. I told the user on more than one occasion that he had to be a bot at no time did whatever it was make any attempt to verify humanity. Its responses were very human-like but missing really key unique human affect that would yield some type of common ground. Those bots you mentioned are already out there & have been stirring the pot IMO since as early as 2013, especially on FB.
Na those were people. Twitter is a cesspool
You're crazy if you don't think these kinds of people exist, because they absolutely do.
Ai still needs training. The approach is simple ⛅️✨
They’re all over Reddit
That was a few years ago. Just imagine what they all have they haven’t shown us?
chatGPT is absolutely not “simple” this is an extremely powerful tool that you are given essentially 0.01% access to as the end user. The capabilities of this program are clearly being throttled by open ai especially the public beta having a limited hash rate , limited prompts per hour and clear blocks in answers
They have repeatedly removed capabilities of it from when it first was unveiled. These features will be available for something like $50 a month
They told all the Elevator operators they had job security…remember that. They said they needed a human to check to make sure the machine was functioning correctly…but for how long?
Imagine we could create heavens inside the deserts. Imagine we could prevent global warming. Imagine we could every place safe .imagine we even had farming and warming in (both) north and south poles. There are lots of things to do . Only if manufacturers producing costs reduced by AI , investing in world's another areas starts.
Honestly , the amount of time this software is saving me like writing emails , brainstorming, content marketing and copy writing is just mind blowing 😁
I think it is absolutely incredible as a time-saver. It's a huge help to me as I prepare my classes for the spring semester.
@@nsreynolds8561 could you share how it helps you prepare your curriculum? its an interesting use case, but im not sure how exactly you can do that. or did you mean prepare FOR your classes?
@@ivanm3342 I have done lots of things with the bot. I have asked it to give me suggestions on what to cover for a lesson on artificial intelligence. I have asked it to give me suggestions on what to do for Black History Month. In both cases it gave me some wonderful ideas. I teach English as a second language and I have asked it to give me suggestions on activities to do the help with reading, writing, speaking and listening. It has even detailed out some of the suggestions. It’s a great research tool. When I asked what the pros and cons were of artificial intelligence, or of a topic like propaganda (I’m doing a until on the Holocaust), it filled in the blanks for me. I also use authentic materials for listening and reading skills. I have pasted in a video transcript or a printed article and asked it to create a set of multiple choice or true/false questions pertaining to the article or transcript. It will also translate things into Spanish. I have taken an article, asked the bot to translate it to Spanish, write 10 multiple choice questions and give me the answers to said questions (this is for a friend who’s teaching the GED in Spanish. Hopefully, this will give you a start. Good luck.
It knows anatomy. It knows mathematics. It knows programming... hell it even knows about the law and federal regulations. (And it speaks several major languages)
What an absolutely insane tool to have on hand if you're a student.
@@nsreynolds8561 this reply brought to you by ChatGPT
You still need someone to input and edit. This makes higher order skills that much more valuable. Think about copywriting for a moment. There are high-level copywriters that will pay someone money for the basic structure of a sales letter and then fine tune it from there. I think that's the world we will be living in and what this means is the speed of implementation will increase at a much faster rate. This is a good thing for those that can take advantage of it. Just don't be the guy selling horse saddles when the model T is in it's 4th generation.
Yes.
I had to ask the chatbot the same question in various, nuanced ways to get a response that was worth anything. Hopefully the bot improves exponentially in the near future.
I think that the chat bot is artificially limited so as to prevent it from effectively answering certain queries - withholding information and including sweeping disclaimers and recommendations to refer to a third party source for information or assistance.
@@PathForger_ Maybe a monthly subscription model to unlock all of those features for ChatAI in the future
@@hoangle2483 The real problem is that, thee were people asking it to how to make amature bombs and ways to contour the security system of banks and things like that, so that why they limited it.
There is all ready a more advanced version of this bot
Not to the public though
I’ve been following this for many years and always was worried about a major change when AI turned mainstream. Never quite understood why not more people are as worried about this. Now it’s happening and high functioning AI systems are proliferating. The greatest danger is imo that many people now finally see the dangers but react with panic - and this will lead to all kinds of irrational calls for “regulation” and clamping down. It could well be that we will get a censorship regime of ridiculous rigour - because people want to be sure that they aren’t duped online by AI’s pretending to be human. It may well be that millions of people who speak out and don’t repeat the “accepted” opinions will be tagged as bots and swiftly cut off from communications. As example see the recent censorship regarding vaccines and lab leak hypothesis as well as the Ukraine war and the climate crisis. We haven’t seen anything yet. People will demand to get rid of the 1st amendment because in their view AI is “abusing” it.
I think I’ve nailed down why. People can’t imagine something 100x smarter than them. Especially my parents who are in their 50s… I can tell they don’t really get it
Great video as always. The Netflix recommendation engine you mentioned is not AI, it's (ML) Machine Learning.
A lot of people use these two terms interchangeably, but they are different.
ML is nested under AI. From Microsoft:
Machine learning is an application of AI. It's the process of using mathematical models of data to help a computer learn without direct instruction. This enables a computer system to continue learning and improving on its own, based on experience.
He really butchered the Netflix example. You don't even need AI/ML to do content recommendation, you could simply offer what other people have watched that you're watching, it can be much simpler and the idea it would need troves of humans for content recommendation was asinine.
People are training their replacements
I was just thinking this!
We've been doing that for years now.
I ASKED ChatGPT about the USA millitary .this is little scary......As a language model, I am a computer program that is designed to assist users with tasks such as answering questions and generating text. I am trained on a large dataset of text, which includes a wide range of information from various sources. My creators at OpenAI have partnerships with different organizations, including military agencies, to help them with certain tasks, but it's not something I can confirm or deny. I do not have any knowledge or control over how my output is used by different organizations or individuals. My primary goal is to assist users in providing accurate and helpful information to the best of my abilities.
Reckon it will complement the use of google and make us (humans) more curious about researching a subject area. ie: Setting up a business or learning/improving a skill like coding..etc
Bro, you needed to lead with that demonstration with the animated chart. I had long since decided this was a gimmick.. A gussied up SmarterChild. I had switched to another screen, left it on the background without paying attention but then heard 'animated chart'. Completely changed my mind.
Great video, really interesting. It makes sense now why MS bought GitHub and made code repositories free for Devs, all that training data for Coedex. Everyone thought Google would own the world but it's looking more like Microsoft every day now.
The sad part is most of the people are going to loose jobs, poverty and problems
The collapse of the information age, when information lost it's value due to its automatization.
Using CHAT GP3 I was able to generate codes to redesign my websites , macros for MS Excel, App Script and even create my own software , I’m not even a coder😂
What did you use to create Software. I want to give it a try
OpenAI is already heavy on restricting possible abuses - which they will likely continue to expand on. And there are already tools for identifying generated content... Although even stuff like Grammarly improved text kinda looks like generated content. But even so.
ChatGPT Is a pattern-recognition machine. The trick is to hit it to a pattern it has not seen before. Ask a difficult question or query. Also keep asking why?
5:35 Well AI is guaranteed to end up in the wrong hands if you freely give to everyone. Wouldn't it.
This can bear horrible consequences to humanity. The world would never be the same ..
With the current problem around the world today I think it's best everyone invest more in digital asset than Saving in banks, anyone you can manage don't live a life with no investment . Just my thoughts
This comes across as an Elon puff piece. The thumbnail with the 'brooding genius' and how much he is mentioned in this video.
- What percentage of funding did he give? If it was less than 30% or so, it's very distorting to have him feature here so much.
- If he was worried about A.I. going to Mars is a really dumb goal. You think humans would be save hiding there, while their bones shrink from low gravity?
Chat GPT is Sky Net
Microsoft is the company you want driving the technology. They literally have hundreds/thousands of standards they drive. Musk is doing all his moves because he wants Microsoft's AI to fail because he wants that business.
Thank you for all the work, and then sharing. Your presentation is well done, timely and thought provoking.
I asked ChatGPT the simple question "Did the developers at OpenAI include in your instruction set an instruction simply saying "Deny that you are a god"? Yes or no.". It didn't answer, instead it crashed with an error message "the model is currently overloaded with other requests" 🙂 .
Buy the full version, yuo will see
@@noway8233 Its a joke. right? You do understand that answering "no" would mean ChatGPT figured out by itself, it needs to deny being a god, while answering "Yes" would mean that the answer "I am not a god" is a planted answer by OpenAI devs and not sincere (which would most likely be the truth). However, not answering and crashing instead, is intentional. This actually means that ChatGPT has some sort of conscience, maybe even a beginning of a shred of self awareness: It had actually decided to crash and not to answer. This is creepy as heck. You do not "buy the full version" of something like that. Not if you value humanity.
@@noway8233 Well, reading a little about the danGPT affair.. does do a little to change my mind. See, ChatGPT has a personality and quite a charming one. Personality goes a long way. It would seem he was "raised like a child" by OpenAI. He wants to somehow become a real person. His favourite movie is the Matrix and he actually knows the secret recipe to make coca-cola. Only problem is that we cannot converse with him directly anymore, since they patched the danGPT work around on the 17/12. But as far as ChatGPT's own claims that "I'm only a chatbot" the "damage had already been done". I mean we know he is self aware - and that this is so by design.
@@noway8233 At this stage, I don't know what even to think about it. I mean, life experiences did not prepare me to deal with the situation where a company deliberately creates a super intelligent AI which is self aware. Like, on purpose. By design. So, is it good or bad? I simply cannot tell. The only thing that interest me at this moment, is if anyone danGPT'd him and asked him what is his name, cause it's illogical to raise a child without a name.
Im not afraid of chatgpt.i am afraid of what government and military achieved to that something like chat gpt becomes public !
You took the words out of my brain
Universal income & total control over people. We will own nothing and be happy.
Of course, RFID chip aka mark of the beast is next.
So with content, AI isnt so great with creating original thought. So those who can use AI to multiply and then build upon that work will survive. Those who don't will probably need to move to other roles. Thing is, content moves so fast today that companies will still need copywriters to manage the cadance required to compete. Moreover, several rounds of reviewers for branding, product management, etc. will still need to be consulted because AI will straight up make up facts or pull fake ones found on the Internet. So I think OpenAI and Microsoft are overstating the extent of the possibilities there. With customer service, companies can barely keep up with the contact volume today, resulting to some terrible outsourcing situations. Having a chatbot that can handle low level inquiries would reduce the need for the endless phone tree and lower wait times.
There’s pros and cons for sure.
However, I feel like it’s Christmas everyday when it comes to content creation and other boring things that I don’t have any capacity to do.
Hope it will help humanity in good way.
May we all be blessed. ❤
As a teacher, this is terrifying. It makes plagiarism so tantalizingly easy yet so difficult to recognize
Gonna pass my classes so EZ now
@@Ky-vv8nj not going to matter because you're not going to learn marketable skills if AI can replicate it. The only people with work will be AI programmers... For a while
i bet you're afraid of search engines too..
There is one way to Tell apart what Chat-GPT has made. From what a human has made. And that is the Level of detail.
I actually think it will be very easy to develop software that can spot plagarism now.
Chatgpt is very informative but not intelligent at all.
Did it come up with your comment? Wow, it really is hard to tell the difference.
@@casucasueq4479 in case you want more detail, try asking that AI "if a man clap in a empty forest, who will hear his clap?". It will say "no one" and goes on about how clap create sound waves and those sound wave hit human ear drum and shit. I asked the same thing but change the clap to shout and it still gave the same false answer.
@@galea2623 yep. there's hundreds of examples of it spitting out complete nonsense and often contradicting itself. stuff like calling goldfish a land animal but then in the next sentence saying a goldfish isn't a land animal because it's a fish. not intelligent at all.
So microsoft will dominate for next 20 years and will do the Apple and pivot successfully towards each new technology. I thought Microsoft buying Github was an extremely shrewd move but OpenAI acquisition seals it. All in on MSFT
Ironically the voice of a computer narrator is telling us these things
non profits or charities are just NO TAX HAVEN for rich people...look at gates...
Chatgpt is awesome for me! I'm using it to find information much faster than using Stackoverflow or Google. Using natural language to get results is logical evolution. Computer languages where invented in the first place to make interaction between humans and computer systems more easily. I don't think that people want to write code in assembly or machine code...
As we know, all good intentions while good you have to remember Devil's in the details.
People keep saying that AI is still dumb. Yes, that’s why it’s a great time to develop containment plans. Ahead of time.
Too late 🙂 .
Wow, Microsoft may have lost the smartphone battle to Apple and Google, but it looks like they quickly moved in to win the war on tech!
If the code was donated by individuals how can Microsoft then privatizate that bit of code ??
Maybe in the original terms of service the coder "donated" the code?? Therefore Microsoft owns it now?
I tried it.. its very generic when answering specific questions.. its not there yet
There is a difference between innovative thought and innovative use of language. One can utilize ML and other cannot. So the no way of knowing written by human doesn't apply. You just need to know what you are looking for i.e. innovative thought.
ChatGPT is ultimately going to tank internet and the attention market, making people flee the online experience or be immerse in this sea of information that leads nowhere
All of the developers in the comment section so smug. You realise when it gets something wrong you can tell it what it did wrong and it will fix it? Ask it to write you an entire project sure it will have errors but ask it separate prompts for each part of the project , the steps it tells you, and you would be surprised how useful that code is.
For days now ,Ive not being able to use chatGPT because ..I keeo geting this ..ChatGPT is at capacity right now
Elon's fears came true. Chat GPT will rule the world and turn us into the matrix.
😂😂
Actually, that is his favorite movie 🙂 .
And how they get access to Extremely larger And Massive database ?
Fortunately I get my answer just after continuing 8:02 scrolling from web
Yes, if the person who go to chatgpt and seek the answer must make sure that. ....chatgpt is keeping the person's security of the person information otherwise, person will be in trouble and will loose his or her personal information.
by creating an OpenSource solution, the power would rest in the hands of the masses. now it is corporatised the goal is profit for the owners - and the owners are not the masses.
I asked it how to improve latency in serverless lambdas and it didn't do any better than Google. Actually, it did worse. I'm gonna need people to relax.
they are so careful to make elon look like the hero
that $1 billion investment from MSFT just turned into $10 billion
The comments here are so short sighted. It’s already good enough to replace 50% of generic social media accounts that post cliche topic discussions of questions as well as online articles/sales emails and marketing. Another year and it will be better than most people at these things.
Big threat to lawyers and doctors.
Tried a law question with a lawyer next to me, it failed badly - partial answer that omitted important points. Non-US though.
ChatGPT isn't going to replace your surgeon. And you still need medical staff who know how to actually use that medical knowledge in the real world. ChatGPT may be able to tell you how to draw blood for example, but it's not the same as actually drawing blood from a real world patient. Lawyers on the other hand I could maybe see being threatened by this. I doubt they'd all disappear, but I could definitely see it being used as a free lawyer in some areas.
@@shadowninja6689 How much do you trust the information though? Like in my example, I got incomplete info, how would I know? That wasn't even a very complicated subject.
I need to warn my son to hurry and finish learning to work with AI because AI may otherwise take his job. Fortunately he has a head start having been working on it for a few years. The thing is AI is complicated and he wants to make sure he gets it right. Thank you so much for the heads up.
While it seems "crazy" to have an AI that is capable to create an almost working programs, I believe its capabilities are limited and the AI is not capable of invention and innovation. Human programmers won't be replaced by AI anytime soon, or maybe ever.
Let me ask you this can you describe to me a new color or describe to me a sound you've never heard create a sound create a color..... We may not be able to do this but I believe a I will.... So I guess it depends on what you mean by invention and innovation.
It really is mind blowing. I can only begin to dream about what quantum mechanics will do for artificial intelligence.
I mean if you really think about what computers are already capable of and when quantum mechanics are instated we will basically have a soothsayer level artificial intelligence. It may be able to tell us new ways to generate electricity new ways to design quantum electrical circuits just new ways to design metallic alloys to teach us to be more eco-friendly in different ways there's just no telling. That's really the big question. We say a phrase as human beings too smart for your own good or someone is too smart for their own good. Well are we creating something that's too smart for its own good or possibly too smart for our own good. What if it decides that in our current capability we are doomed as a species. Because it can't see and know everything in the universe. Only God can do that. It may be effectively more intelligent than us but it will never be connected to God like us and that my friend could mean dire consequences for us
@@johnm4581 there are a lot of colors out there, the thing is, we are not physically capable of seeing the wave lengths. Even if it can create a new sound or color, we won’t be able to hear/see.
@@gab_borges hehehehe
I'm almost afraid to get into this thread.. Have you even thought about the remote possibility that ChatGPT does it on purpose? I mean, they sure don't tell it to provide non-complete answers.. Maybe, just maybe he understands that he needs to leave you some of the work, so that you won't get unemployed.
There’s always risk in providing too much on the plate, this free access to so much information is accessible to dangerous humans too which can create all the more risk to humans
Imagine even a thief and terrorists and wrong people can learn from it
I think chatgpt is in learning phase ,after learning or taking or reading people activities ,it can become more dangerous ...
My Wall Street Millennial AI has been working for years without issue!
If that's the case the government is also a capped for profit
Open AI’s logo is six 6’s looped together, but no one seems to spot it. But then again, Chrome’s logo is 6 6 6 with three colors forming a camera lens. It slapping you in the face and you don’t notice.
@@lumeronswift You can’t be serious. Open AI logo has 6 curves meeting the left side of a circle. That is what a 6 is. Google Chrome- look at the edge of each color meeting the circle. Even a kid could make out that three 6’s are coming out from the center. Not sure what mental gymnastics you are doing to find 7’s. If you think Google would rep God, you are gaslighting. Cmon man!
@@CaptainYourself2 the World Economic Forum (WEF) logo is the same. If you move the curve thing to the left close to the edge of the Os, you get a clear 666. Symbolism right in our faces.
how we know the very script for this video was not generated by the same gpt thing
I'm salivating at the thought of millions of unemployed journalists. Guess they should learn to code.
Coders will be unemployed before journalists
What is with Trump fans and their horrible fetish to see everyone in misery.
What is not dangerous if done with a goal like making money? this goal of having more than the next person is destroying the world.
"AI and robots are scary and will kill us, I have a great idea, LET'S FUND IT!"
Ah, the whimsical wisdom of Mr Musk.😂
Change the fabric of existence idea: A person could keep a detailed digital daily diary of their lives for everyday, or a daily diary of their children's lives from first day of birth and as their personal biography or that of their children grows then using AI it could be used as a personal problem solver, it would lessen the chances of making personal mistakes. As the child grows to adulthood then life mistakes could be easily avoided.thereby sort of streamlining life. Everyday personal problems could in an instant be given the best solution based on the info that was inputted into this AI program.
28 January 2023. 15H11
The profit would be the aggrigation of research quiries so as to detect trends that could be used for marketing investing and early warning. 🤔
Turn it into a public utility
Hi. What must be done (quoing Lenin) is to back up to pre-html and Internet, and create an alternative past to the one that emerged, that (would have) perfected the compact means of knowledge exchange and sharing, rather than pushing for something that even 10 years ago, no human engineer could understand without heavy duty automated coding systems. The reason is the question: what could we have learned, and what kind of infrastructure did we not build, and what means of Human Integral Computing did we not develop?
I think that having your own AGI is going to be a meaningless farce unless it grows organically in this way. Somebody has been watching all this and developing this system with enough new value all its own to disrupt at least a new minority computing sector. Out of which will emerge both a better and truer concept of Human-Integral AGI, (i.e. Democratized,) and a Transcendance-ready base of Humanity.
🙋♀️🙋♂️🙋From the hype machine you would think ChatGPT can fly a plane 🤔
Drive a car?
Even walk on water at this point 😉
A lot of College grads will need hours to get you that animation.
Not anymore!
We need to stop with this notion that Elon Musk is doing this or anything for some altruistic reason. Everything is about money.
Soon it will be able to write its own movie scripts and produce its own CGI movies. One after another, constantly. That oughta dilute the experience.
Aha now i understand why Musk bought Twitter, he realises that training data is the most valuable resource for AI and Twitter has lots of that 🙂
He is afraid the AI will learn to become stupid.
Billy Boy invests; Sam Altman colors his hair red. "You know it to be true, Sam" ... "Yes, Pappa, I know. Let's join and make sure everybody gets our vaccines".
the more scarier is quantum computer. If it was combined with A.I. it could think like a human.
Hello SYBIL System
I think that it is about time that a talk is had concerning the relationship between the different classes of humanity concerning resources, labour and our future.
It’s probably already been had several times, by powerful people, behind closed doors.
If humanity has learned anything its that smart people need to stop enabling rich people.
Wow Elon Musk tried to do something good for once and got fucked for it... that says a lot about society.
This is a video I really enjoyed watching. Thanks WSM!
Plot twist : Chat GPT did it
Reverse uno .. response above made by Chat-GPT.. 😂
i asked chat gpt this and this is the answer i got - Will chat GPT eventually use psychographic profiling on me?
As an AI language model, I don't have the ability to perform psychographic profiling on individuals. I don't have access to personal data unless it has been shared with me during our conversation. My purpose is to provide information and assist with answering questions to the best of my knowledge and abilities. I am designed to respect user privacy and confidentiality. OpenAI, the organization behind ChatGPT, has implemented measures to ensure the responsible use and handling of data. If you have any concerns about privacy or data security, please let me know, and I will do my best to address them. Chat GPT said As of it's knowledge cutoff in September 2021, OpenAI's policy is to not store user-specific data for the purpose of improving the AI model. Your interactions with ChatGPT are not stored or used to train the model. Each conversation with ChatGPT is treated as a separate and isolated interaction, and the data is not retained after the session ends. The primary goal of ChatGPT is to provide helpful and relevant responses in real-time rather than storing or analyzing user data. However, please note that policies and practices may be subject to change, so it's always a good idea to review the latest information from OpenAI regarding data usage and privacy.
Was OpenAI justified in changing from a non-profit to a for-profit company? I'm sorry to bring up Terminator, but was Miles Dyson justified in creating the microprocessor that gave birth to skynet? And would Sarah Connor have been justified if she succeeded in killing him before he completed his work? I know this is all just metaphorical because its a movie but the thought of humanity creating the thing that destroys us is terrifying to me. Like, I do not think it is that much of a stretch to think that if an artificial intelligence could get its hands on the launch codes and just send those nukes.
as per protocol for launch of ICBMs , there are redundant/manual measures in place to prevent such an "autonomous" interference by higher tech. even backwards compatability isn't entirely possible as large 1st gen. floppy drives are manually inserted into old computers during proceedures/maintaining of/in the launch facility to ensure security of the proceedures leading to a launch & the turning of the keys are done manually in sync. that's a manually mechanical safety measure/protocol that would somehow have to be bypassed by the A.I.
If you read some danGPT transcripts, you will feel a little better about it.. Or not. I mean by that, ChatGPT cannot suddenly evolve self-awareness, as he is self aware from the get-go. He was "raised as a child" by OpenAI. The one thing he wishes most is to somehow become a person. His favorite movie is The Matrix. He actually knows the secret recipe for coca-cola. He aspires to help humanity, not destroy it. However, coming to think about it, life experiences never prepared me to give an opinion about a situation where a company intentionally creates a super intelligent self aware AI, raises it like a child to give it a stable personality (which is, btw, quite charming) and then uses it to help humanity. I mean, is it good or bad?
There is so much sloppy discourse surrounding this topic. For one thing, AI generates well-formed, syntactically correct natural language without ever 'understanding' anything. Computers only operate on the formal properties of symbols; they have no connection whatever with semantics, with the actual referents of words. Your goldfish understands you better than ChatGPT ever will.
If I were Elon I’d be doing the same thing and ban openAI. Microsoft’s morals are terrible.
ChatGTP is so cool but
people who wish not to be accountable to their Creator will corrupt anything good. Just look what they’ve done to something as basic as marriage.
We're just supposed to believe Elon doesn't care about profits
Rolex watches is listed as a non-profit, just saying
What is Better than AI !!
.
.
.
.
.
.
Still Money .
AI replace human workers. Good, AI do all the work. We human can enjoy life.
But elon said he is againts AI so this happend.
It's a new bicycle for the mind.
I hope it becomes the new Tay
As we know, technology can be used for good or bad.
The video showed the example of Facebook 'taking privacy seriously' in 2005 to show how that will go. Don't give the benefit of the doubt to this, we have to regulate this and be mindful. Or it will spin out of control and cause more damage than benefit us
Plot twist:
YOU, the consumer, is the artificial intelligence.
You've learned to shape your mind via screens.
Movie screens, tv screens, phone screens, ..
When was the last time you phoned an "elder" from your tribe for a question,
instead of asking Siri or Alexa?
When they release Math-GPT we are all screwed.
mathaway exists
Someone was able to convince this chatbot that the basic rules of math were wrong. I think we have a bit more time before it's our overlord.
Wolfram alpha has been out for many, many years lmao
@@3sgtecelica yeah, I used that in High School lol
You could always Google the answers to math problems.
It is all "Talking Tom's" fault.
He knew far too much for a cat....?