@@joeybaseball7352 you’re off on this one, there is a detailed “audience retention” graph that helps us creators see what parts of the video people watch. RUclips doesn’t talk much about it so most people haven’t heard of it.
When I was a soldier in 1987 - 1989, I wore such boots. At first they seemed uncomfortable to me and rubbed my feets. Around the spring of 1988, we were given high-laced boots. Having tried all the options, we returned to the old boots. These boots are not hot in summer and not cold in winter, they do not get wet in the rain. Until now, somewhere on the balcony I have a pair of such boots.
@@VolodymyrKostenko-q1m как-то некрасиво называть свою страну улусом, Володимир, но на вопрос-то вы так i не ответили? если вдруг? то какие планы на 24й-то?
@@sjoormen1they are good boots, and last a long time. It takes feet time to get used to them. When starting military service, sudden everyday use the city boys that never wore boots would have finger nails come off, pieces of skin rub off, bloody feet and was a nightmare. This was the boot of the villages and a lot of people working dirty jobs.
I used those Kirza boots in the Army in early 90s. We had plenty of modern boots, but used Kirza for some daily work and duty in the fields. To say the least, I was amazed how comfortable and practical they were when you work in trenches, dirt, high grass and similar environments. Especially when you know how to use it with footcloth. Also, despite simplicity, those boots had a lot of killer features - they were light, reliable, easy to maintain, protected and stabilized the foot and it was super-easy to keep your feet dry. Only best tactical boots with modern lacing and Goretex can compete with them. So I understand why Kirza boots were used for more than a century.
Мне тоже довелось носить кирзу с портянкой после берцев и носков, и честно говоря, возвращаться к берцам после этого не хотелось совершенно, а особенно возвращаться к вонючим носкам) В кирзу можно быстро вкинуться и быстро их снять при необходимости ( что не раз пригождалось в наряде)). Единственный минус у кирзы, что я выявил - в них неудобно бегать и маневрировать, они тяжелее берцев. Во всем остальном - одни плюсы
@@johnweiland9389 rectangular pieces of cloth that are worn wrapped around the feet to avoid chafing. Footwraps are also quicker to dry than socks and are more resistant to wear and tear: any holes can be compensated for by re-wrapping the cloth in a different position.
The officers had leather jack boots. Kirza boots were for the lower ranks. Either kind of these boots were worn without socks. Instead of socks each foot would be wrapped with a strip of linen or cotton fabric in a such way that would make these boots quite comfortable to wear. When part of the fabric strip gets wet from sweat, the foot gets rewrapped so the dry end wraps around the foot while the wet end is wrapped around the crus to dry out. Due to water resistance, these boots could also be used as a vessel.
@Kelly Harbeson носки у нас умели шить, даже при советах, просто это настолько плохая обувь, что если носить её с носками вместо портянок, ноги превратятся в фарш, это такая советская магия
I collect Soviet stuff and do reenactment, the foot wraps are more of a thick flannel material and make these boots actually pretty comfortable to wear, in fact I’ll use these when shoving snow in the winter and with wool socks and foot wraps theses stay nice and warm and work great
I don't think you understand war boots enough, because these are some of the best. These boots didn't get hot in the summer, and didn't get too cold in the winter-they're kind of comfortable, too and THEY ARE COMPLETELY WATER TIGHT. In a warzone, when you're marching for miles/fighting in wet, muddy trenches, walking through boggy fields and unpaved, muddy roads after artillery has bombed them and tanks drove through, being watertight is far more important than being resistant to fire; fire is not that common, can be avoided most of the time, meanwhile, the rain doesn't stop, the rainy, muddy, sloshy weather of September/October til April doesn't stop the fighting, the fighting doesn't stop if you're in a foxhole pinned down for hours with water seeping in. If it wasn't for these boots being water-tight, millions more would be dead/with amputated feet/out of action due to trenchfoot.
Spot on. The dude in the clip has zero understanding of the nature of infantry warfare. He even has a pair of PERFECT all-season cross-country infantry boots in his hands, and still fails to understand, declaring them "the worst" compared to some total junk you would NEVER want to wear in a field / mud, and only citing cost benefit.
This dude probably wouldn’t last a couple of days on the snow fighting in the trenches without crying for a latte because his hands and feet are too cold;🤣🤣….if these boots are water tight and insulated in the inside they certainly are good enough for me.😂🎉🎉🇷🇺🇺🇸🤣
Are you guys surprised? Not calling anything from Russia cheap junk is an easy way to get a swarm of Russophobes accusing you of being a Kremlin bot who sold his soul to Putin, or whatever. That, and many Westerners just have an extraordinarily deep seated anti-Russia bias.
I was in the British military in the 1980s and 1990s our military and our boots were pretty good. I married an Estonian woman and used to do work at their country house on the property in Tabasalu, Estonia. I used a pair of those Russian boots and they were really quality items hard wearing and superbly comfortable. The quality of the leather and lining was just excellent. I totally understand why they would have kept them that style and for so long.
I heard a story of a Soviet soldier who got boots two sizes too big. His comrades thought he was mad, and a pain in the *** in the rain when he would get stuck in the mud. However, come the winter, he stuffed his boots with newspaper and had the warmest feet in the regiment.
Yep, I have a pair of 80s model officer boots, one and a half size bigger, i put height insoles, plus thicker socks. So warm and comfier and easier to walk on.
I served in 2010, in the military registration and enlistment office we were given military boots along with a uniform. During the first week of the "young fighter course" in the military unit, some guys wore their legs very badly, and then we were given kirza boots with footcloths, my legs felt so blissful then that I still remember it, how great it was compared to high-top boots and socks = )
@@мишкатоптыжка-в1ж Разобравшись как наматывать портянки без складок - очень даже не обязательно. Даже я, бывший в армии всего лишь на сборах, бегал в них марш броски по 20 км без особых последствий
My father was an officer in the Soviet army in 1980-s, he said that although officers were issued cooler full-leather boots, many of them would still prefer kirza boots for being lighter. He brought a few pairs home, I would occasionally wear them when doing chores around our village house - didn't like them much, mostly because the "shoe" part was completely stiff, and putting them on was giving me some kind of "foot claustrophobia" (e. g. the feeling that I maybe shouldn't put my foot into that, because it's unclear whether I will be able to get it back out). I didn't bother with footwraps, would just put several cotton socks on each foot, and then a thick wool sock on top of that if the weather was cold.
I have 2 different versions? One pair looks just like the ones in the video, the other are not "flat" over the toes but has more space over them. Use them in the winter driving my tractor and when driving motorcycles. I fixed the "nail problem" with a pair of thick wool soles. You are right. The rubber gets a bit stiff and slippery after a couple of decades.
looks like he completley skipped part where russia with germany attack poland and russia with germany were allies with plan to split lands called ribbetropp molotow. And then they occupied my country to 1993 where for rest of the world war end in 1945.
This was very interesting to me. My mother was employed by The Florsheim Shoe Company in Chicago, Illinois when WWII ended, and she told me that on the day they were informed that the war in Europe was over, that the manager of the factory was upset that his contracts would be canceled. He was not too popular with the ladies working there who had family members fighting in that war.
That's just the nature of war under capitalism, it's not about survival (most of the times), it's all about supplying the government and leeching away the tax money from everyone else, even the guys getting killed out there to keep you safe.
No kidding....now of the war production factories where my mother worked she never mentioned that one. Just Motorola and we'll Precious Metal? Or something where she made machine gun mounts for bombers. And she had three brothers in the service. In WW-2.
I remember wearing one of these in 2011, while serving in the army. Mine hade a glued on sole, and most of the guys from my squad changed their combat boots for this type of footwear, as it fits better for the hot climate. Also, you can easily take them off while having a break on a speed march, what made them really popular among soldiers. Thanks for the video!
I owned the East German copies (basically the same boots issued to East Germany from the 50's to the 80's). They were fairly indestructible, hard on your feet with or without socks, waterproof. Very plain outside of them being high boots.
The East German Army , the NVA used Leather boots for the conscripts that were essentially copies of the March Jackboots for the lower enlisted personnel and the cadre NCO's and Officers had slightly taller leather boots.
@@MrHrKaidoOjamaaVKJV The ones from Sportsman's Guide East German Surplus boots were identical to the Russian boots with the cotton canvas coated type material.
@exexpat11 Those from the Sportsman's Guide were not genuine, not the real deal. I know I wore the real deal in the Estonian Defense Forces in the early 1990's
These boots, at least for me, make for encredably good work and walking boots particularly for the price. There aren't many places where you can get knee high boots with durable soles in for $80. They are also encredably comfortably when you use footwraps with them since in my experience they fill out the boot better and allow sweat to wick away alot easier.
@@lazzie7495 I got mine from a Russian military surplus site. It's one of the first results you get when you type it Google. They use European sizing rather than the Soviet one to be clear.
@@Timsturbs indeed, although linen works very well too for more tropical environments. I use the German method that is cotton footwraps with wool socks for most conditions. The wool sock providing warmth and the foot wraps for durability.
Sore feet, the nightmare of infantrymen . Those boots adresses two of the most important issues of walking miles over miles : weight and dryness . Lesson learned from my time in the French marine infantry (2ème RIMA regiment)
I wore those boots during my militeraized service (emercom) in years 2002-2005, as an old colleague gave me his old style boots which were too small for him and told me not to wear the new-style boots with laces. I was very satisfied, as I could put them on in a second during the night shifts and could come into rather deep water or mud with them. I used to climb, jog and jump in these boots without any problems. do not see any problems in using these boot with the tissue instead of socks. cheers from Russia!
Здравия желаю товарищу по службе в мчс :) Месяц назад дмб из ногинска. Сейчас выдают берцы фарадей / парижская комунна удивительная обувь которая согревает ногу в 30 градусную жару и охлаждает зимой помимо того что модели которые выдают ещё и самые дешёвые и неудобные в которых ходишь скрипя как сквидварт и при скользишь на любом льду.
It might be on the lower side of reliability and quality, but if they really are lighter and more waterproof than the other boots, I'd take them. Having wet feet at war times, especially in the Russian winter, is life threatening. And having to walk with heavy boots packed with snow or mud is extremely fatiguing, considering the huge distances the soldier had to walk during the later stages of the war.
Tend to agree. The comments section reveals they were worn with footwraps and not socks and so I presume that helped solve the insulation issue to an extent as well.
@@jackmacfakie1387 портянки носили вместо носков как более надежное средство, так как носки в таких сапогах, да и вообще в сапогах снашиваются буквально за 2 часа. Занимался в свое время военно исторической реконструкцией РККА, ходил и в ботинках кожаных с обмотками и сапогах кожаных и кирзовых, кирзовые сапоги наиболее универсальны.
@@jackmacfakie1387 And properly wrapped footwraps stabilized the lower leg. Also somehow decreased sweating, perhaps by giving airy cushion or just having more absorbent volume. Natural fibre socks will die in such a boot after couple of hours of running. And synthetic fiber was not suitable for long wear until fairly recently.
I wore those shoes in Soviet Army at the end of 1980's. It is not just a boot. IT is the whole system of tightly wrapped around a foot piece of cloth, called Portianka. If your foot gets wet or sweaty you can wrap your foot with the another side, while wet part dries as you continue walking. When you sleep, you wrap the cloth around the boot and let it and the boot dry up. Becides the lighter weight, you don't have to worry about socks to carry spares. As per fire resistance, It never even crossed my mind, as it never been a problem. Last, these boots saved lots of lives, as it takes split second to put them on, no shoe laces to worry, no socks to put, just put a cloth over the boot and slide the foot into the boot. Cheap and light does not mean it is bad, it did the job it was designed for. And I completely disagree with western and German propaganda that Soviet leaders just threw the bodies at any problem. It is especially very visible when Soviet union started war against Japan. With relatively few troops Red Army was way more successful in destroying Japanese Imperial Army that was occupying China, Korea, Sakhalin and Kurils
Respect to you, my friend. The USSR steamedrolled the Japanese in Manchuria while the US were struggling with their island hop. The west tends to attribute "throwing bodies" to anyone they don't like.
@@borghorsa1902 Until you look at the details and compare apples to apples. Against Japan Americans lost way more troops while fighting for just a few islands in Pacific. uSSR defeated largest, industrial area in Manchuria which had largest Japanese Force. USSR Red Army lost most troops in 1941-1942. At the time when German Army was the strongest and most capable. Yes lots of losses killed, taken POWs. The largest losses were due to criminal treatment of Soviet POWs. It is the established fact that for German troops Eastern front was the same thing Bakhmut was to Ukranian troops
As a person that has 3 pairs of these boots. They are very durable all weather boots, and great for outdoors and even horse riding. Down side, they do take very long to break in and can be very uncomfortable at first. But with proper boot socks and time it becomes very comfortable. The water proof quality of the boot is what is the most important factor to me. And light weight. Weight equals lbs, lbs quality pain. Having a water proof boot is far better to have in Eastern Europe too as most of eastern Europe is a bog, swamp and hill grassland. So I wouldn't say it is a bad boot, it is a great boot for the area it is designed. You want a light boot in a bog and swamp as it is easier to get out of mud versus a heavy boot.
I do wwii soviet reenacting and i can guarantee these boots are quite comfortable and versatile. With footwraps they fit quite snug and are easy to repair as im a cobbler and have torn a few open
As reenactor who got his hands on british, american and russian kits i can tell with full confidence - boots from all sides have their own strenghs and weaknesses. Soviet jackboots so far lightests and waterproof. American - most comfortable. British - you can go on any dangerous and slippery surface and not fall - nails will chew into anything.
It is absolutely the best most practical ugly war-boot in the world, knee deep in mud, water, wet snow. Just imagine tiying fancy bootlaces with frozen hands or in the mud, having wet socks, and wet heavy soaked leather, only ankle high... and so on. Think.
I love looking at historical trade offs like this. Seeing what decisions were made and why, and ultimately the outcomes of those choices. We can learn so much from seeing what has already been tried. Thank you for doing these sorts of videos.
@@petesheppard1709 Yeah. Portyanki are awesome. I've been hiking and bushcrafting in these boots for a few years, i definitely see the Kirza above the leather tearing at some point but they've been amazing boots. If they break I'll just get another pair. They don't feel cheap or poorly made, but easily replacing them if they were damaged was part of the whole reason why they were designed the way they were to be mass produced. They're great boots. They fill the role well and if they break, replace them and keep going lol I'd rather wear these over riding boots or muck boots any day. They're too much fun. They feel really nice too. And I've jogged in them before and they don't feel bad at all. They're just different.
My father served in the Yugoslav Army in the early 1950s. He told me they were issued socks and foot-wraps. They used the socks while on base but when they were out in the field they used the foot-wraps. My father claimed that when foot-wraps were properly used you could march for miles and never get a blister.
the Kirza is great because you can make a bigass jack boot which is perfect for the deep snow and mud you will often run into in Russia, but it's not excessively heavy.
My first pair of kirza boots was with LEATHER heel. It was 1987 BTW. After initial break-in period they were quite comfortable, if heavy, and careful wrapping of the foot was not necessary - simply place foot wrap on top and push your foot in (socks are necessary for this trick). After 4 months in boot camp and training center I upgraded them to officer version (all-leather, shorter, lighter, rubber sole) and woolen socks since it was far North and we were Navy after all :). Logically working boots (called gady) should be issued to sailors instead of jackboots but I newer got mine. Instead I purchased extra pair of dress boots and was wearing them with socks when on shore. On board everybody was wearing legendary perforated submarine slippers :)
Is it true that those perforated submarine slippers were introduced in the navy only after an admiral visited a ship, promptly slipped and cracked his head open?
Worst boot? I've worn out at least two pairs of them. I love them. I've worn them with both socks and footwraps. Because they (or the footwraps) are not tight, they don't restrict blood flow to the feet, meaning your feet don't get so cold in cold weather, and in the heat, your feet don't sweat so bad, because they are loose enough for sweat to more easily escape. Easy to get on and off - you can't say that about the WWII US Army lace up boot with those blasted gaiters.
It was reported that when Russia switched from the Kirza jackboot to the low lace-up boots the General officers were quoted as saying, "Wait until the spring floods come the soldiers will wish they had Kirza boots".
My greatgrandfather wore his own, self made leather boots in ww2 and this situation was quite common.Soviet people in this days make many things by they own hands. If they need something on the front, and army have no suplies, they made it! If the take bad items they make them beter, upgrade it. Greatgrandfather can make boots, horse harness, even wooden house, etc etc
I do little bit of "airsoft reenactment" and I wore these during the 5 hour game in melting snow and ankle deep mud, a lot of running, jumping around, in total I ran 7km with it. I had telogrejka- watnik uniform, socks and footwraps( the footwraps were too small so I had to wear socks also) and I was amazed how waterproof they are. Normaly during games I wear modern combat boots, but these are in fact very light weight which made running feel better. On the downside, I would not like to have anything heavy fall on my foot because the leather is quite thin. My feet were completely dry and if I know how to wrap the footwraps better, not like a halfwit my feet would feel little bit less sore. I plan to buy proper footwraps and test it for some 10+ km march in summer to see if my fingers would fall off or not :D
The kirza boots are also very easy and quick to put on. Also in around a month of wearing they change their shape exactly to your feet and become quite comfortable. I never had any problems with nails when I was in Soviet army, like feeling them. And especially during the WW2 russian soldiers had to walk enormous distanses, when the roads turn to mud, and that is what thouse boots are really made for.
Thank you. I used to wear KIRza combat boots when I was I kid, it is very bad in the cold weather. But they were nearly indestructible. Also you the army “became” red only after 1017 revolution, befor that it was just a Russian army :) thumbs up!
I’m really glad you added the stats about views versus museum visits. I work in museums. It’s a perpetual problem. And then does anyone actually pay attention when they are there….I’m so pleased to see videos like this reaching so people who are just sat at home and haven’t had to even travel and negotiate the terrible cafe! It’s a great way of getting meaningful history to people, and telling a story and interacting with an object is much more accessible than sticking something in a case and having a label next to it. We are so restricted by how much information we can get across. I work with the objects but the visitors never get to see what I see. They see two lines on a label, and no context. This is far more useful. Thank you. Try and get your hands on straw insulated winter army boots - massive things. It would be interesting to freeze them too and compare their performance.
To be presice, in 1914 its wasn't called Red Army, cos it was still Russian Empire, and Red Army was the name of communist army during Civil War and then in thr USSR. Also, Bolshevik revolution (or rather October Socialist revolution) was third, not second, in February sa.ne year was rhe February revolution that put an end to Russian Empire and provisional government was installed, but they failed to meet people's demands, didn't fulfill their promises and didn't stop the war, so then Bolsheviks stepped in and overthrew them.
I find your historical analysis of boots of WWII an amazing analysis! It is such an important piece of kit that just gets overlooked by so many fanboys. If you've ever had to do a road march with your rucksack you are INTIMATELY aware of how good or bad your boots are! Thanks for your efforts to bring light to such a cool part of our history!
Another massive advantage of this construction method, especially given the circumstances: they don't require any industrial machines or electricity. The nailed construction is all handmade and construction could continue even in awful conditions, unlike boots that were made with goodyear welt stitching machines.
@@jackmacfakie1387 Cope. They went from a backwards agrarian state to parity with the US, the most powerful empire in history, while victims of the holocaust. China has now surpassed you.
Служил с 1986 по 88 года, Кирзачи -самая лучшая обувь!!! Находились в тундре - носили при температуре до -50 градусов! Сапоги и две пары портянок и все окей! Потом были в Казахстане при +45 -50 градусов тепла ,одна пара тонких портянок и все окей! КаКИЕ БОТИНКИ? Все они не удобны их надо разнашивать,у кого-то стопа широкая, у кого-то подьем стопы высокий и все этого дико не удобно, отсюда мозоли, натертости и тд ... А Кирзачи одел с портянками и лепота!!! Попробуйте в своих ботинках одеться за 45 секунд!!! Есть у меня сейчас ботиночки от фирмы 5.11 и, что вы думаете? Ну супер просто тащусь - две стельки ,одна пласмассовая другая мягкая ,повторяе форму ноги - ну супер! Одел,был таким довольным пока через час ходьбы не натер на одной ноге мозоль на пятке!!! Сначало не мог понять причину, а потом увидел,что на пядке обуви где проходит шов ниток - получился бугорок из ниток и теперь что не делал все за зря, трет ногу и все! Вот вам и крутая обувь - 150 евро на ветер !!!
English calls them both boots but one has laces and the other one is a solid impregnable tube. The latter is far far superior in some cases. The issue on the Eastern Front was not so much fire and snake bites but getting across vast swaths of mud and snow and keeping the foot dry and not frostbitten. That is the main task that is why water resistance is paramount.
in 1984, I was a teenager in the USSR, and I lived in a military town, my parents bought me children's kirza boots in a military store, at first I didn't like them because they were too simple, but after wearing them I got great pleasure from their patency everywhere and superiority in fights with peers. I think the big mistake was the refusal of the army from kirza boots, modern tactical shoes are just a shame.
@@Grisuu Superiority is when you have two blacksmith's hammers on your feet, one blow with a cast-iron boot - the opponent is disabled. Still impenetrable shin protection. Also, when walking through the forest, there is a feeling that the tracks from the t-34 tank are on their feet. At the same time, the boots are light, warm in winter, cool to the foot and dry in summer. For reliability-ideal. The most important thing is that the child has such an opinion! And also, perhaps you didn't know - in the browser from the Yandex search engine, all videos are translated by voice!!! online in your native language, it is extremely convenient. Try.
Landmines in Afghanistan- its one of the reasons the high-topped boot had to go. Look at the photos of Soviets in Afghanistan and those that could, wore those blue Nike-like sneakers. Land mines were one of the reasons from a medical standpoint. Yes running up and down mountains had a lot to do with it, but if you search the medical reasons it becomes even clearer. If/when a Soviet trooper stepped onto a landmine the explosive force and super heated air was tunneled up and through the high-topped portion of the boot basically tearing everything off the lower leg. The boot became a chimney. If stepped on while wearing a low-topped boot or sneaker the explosion from a anti-personnel mine would destroy the foot and maybe some of the lower leg but wearing the boot was risking damaging the knee which is vital in rehabilitation. Awesome videos-thank you for the history lessons!
@@iac4357 that's the only reason , landmine damage on foot wearing boot vs sneakers has no difference and his explanation is a plain myht? Kyrza massive issue is the complete lack of ankle support . they were made to fight in europe plains and mud . Dry mountain leads to thoussands of ankle casualties and greatly diminished the troops mobility . Sneakers remained extremly rare for the whole war , tho some amount managed to get issued laced boots (some with metal crampon ) and such boots remained well liked into chechens war even tho kirza was still majority
me too. had to learn about one of the world wars at school and how the allies would cut the frozen legs off german corpses, throw them in an oven for 20 minutes to thaw out, then wear their boots because their own were giving them trenchfoot. I do wonder what were the brand of those boots that made them so valuable.
27 million is the total number The Soviet Union lost 9 million soldiers in World War II. 16.6 million people were civilians killed by Nazi Germany. Nazi Germany also lost about 9 million people on the eastern front. The stories about the heavy losses of the Soviet Red Army are a myth. And in my opinion tarpaulin boots are one of the best boots. They are comfortable, reliable and can keep your feet safe from many dangers.
Cheap waterproof boot that just worked. Might not be the most comfortable but it was the best boot that the USSR needed at the time. Could have made something fancy but you would have ended up with dudes fighting barefoot. Tall boots are also great in the wet muddy conditions that the Eastern Front was infamous for, a conventional boot would have been pretty horrible in comaprison considering the depth of the mud would have meant mud in you're boots.
I am very glad that you are not one-sided in your assessment of WWII Russian products and attitudes! Others (probably for political reasons) look down on and slander the Russians. They had maybe 20 years to develop industry after the feudal tsarist system and the intervention of the Western powers. The industrialized British, who dominate the world empire, poke fun at the Russians, who were "wiped off the map" by the Germans in both wars. Without the USA, there would be no GB today. What are they talking about and on what basis? I'm not a "Russian fan", I just hate when they judge anything one-sidedly!
I read a book about the battle of the bulge, and there apparently were some German troops who had previously fought the Russians on the eastern front who had been transferred to the eastern front that were found wearing these Russian boots. So I’d say they might’ve been pretty damn good boots to have made it all the way between fronts.
Lower part is most important and it is leather + rubber, upper only keep water out and for that purpose works. Boots are light what is another plus if you wear them almost all the time. In short, perfect war boots.
@@Totemparadox What exactly is bad or poor or not functional in those boots? Leather part, synthetic waterproof part, rubber part, nailed together part, light weight part? Or is it maybe"commie" part that bothers you? Hm, expert?
@@danijel3227 By all records these are some of the most uncomfortable boots according to people who have used them either in service or civilian life. Also the fact that they're pull ons means they slide on your feet needing extra steps to not get blisters. Also being totally waterproof means your feet become like a swamp.
The same reason we Marines in the Vietnam era wore the worst excuses for a boot ever made. Wore out at an alarming rate, the soles wore down and the boot became useless. Why? It was cheap.
Today's military footwear is designed for mechanized troops, those of that period were for long marches, for walking in snow and mud I would have preferred these boots, I think the evaluation should consider the environment of use, In this case, for example compared to the boots of the Germans, the Soviet ones were lighter, waterproof, cheap to produce and a little higher, it seems difficult to argue that they were worse.
During my service in the army 2007-2009, we were given these boots for the first time. We wore them either with party girls or with socks. It was more comfortable in party girls only because of the soft material that was pleasant to the foot and the shoes sat tighter to the foot. We were lucky to find boots from the 40s and 50s. They were very beautiful and virtually immortal. Then everyone finally changed their shoes into shoes, but that's another story ....
I have been loving these videos on military boots. You should take a look at some Servis Cheetahs they are infamous for their use by the Taliban, Mujahideen, and even the Afghan security force over the last 40 years.
The one you cut was a nice pair, the one I got was a cold war variant, cardboard inner soles so the first time I wore them melted the inner soles, dont use socks on them, they will chew through socks within a day, if you wanna make it work with socks replace the inner soles, other than that its waterproof and will do as advertised.
Typical for USSR: Cheap, easy and quick to build. Also no laces: Muddy terrain is a nightmare for laced boots. But the downside is that there isn't much ankle support
@@wecx2375 Kilties are good but unfortunately they don't protect the laces or eyelets. And when everything is covered in mud, it takes a long time to take off your shoes and clean it.
I think the light weight and water proofness would be a larger benefit than flame resistance and puncture resistance (of the shaft). It'd be nice if they could be laced though, because I doubt these properly fitted many soldiers.
They are supposed to be worn with footwraps - you can google the word "портянки" and see what I mean - that solve the fitting (and hygiene) problem. Variations for paratroopers had laces on top of the shaft so that boots don't fly off though
12:37 you just contradict yourself. Why taking the trouble to design a waterproof, hardnailed, well waxed boot to shoe bodies just thrown into the battles? Just give them sandals in that case. Why wasting time if your are calculating the soldier wouldn't survive long?
If you ever tried to wear them, they are actually very comfortable when worn properly, e.g. with the cotton linen instead of socks. No clue why you call them the worst. They are lightweight and obviously way better for the mud, as you noted, which actually makes them best infantry boots for the actual combat in Europe, which is all-season and cross-country. And even if the water / mud gets inside, you simply change the linen. They are not for jogging or for the mountains, but they ARE the perfect solution for the real all-season cross-country combat. Try that in your fancy leather boots with bunch of holes for the water / mud to get in.
It's one of the most versatile boots. People still wear them in extreme conditions, where you need to do lots of dirty work and be in mud. I'd rather choose them than some overpriced timberlands
Love the history: military, materials, etc. I think that you have shown that the RIGHT answer for combat boots in WWII might depend on the country and its circumstances. Kind of like tactics and armament. Oh, and rage, rage, ragedy, rage-a-licious, rage-a-mungous. For the al-go-rythm.
Could you do a video on Red Army Valenki boots? They are woolen winter boots used during WW2. Even German and Finnish soldiers used captured Valenki to deal with the cold.
Two issues: It was not the Russian army in WWII, it was the Red Army or Soviet Army. The Soviet Union was a multiethnic state! These boots are postwar production. They're very close to wartime, but it's not a proper comparison IMO
Russia pre revolution was a multiethnic state and it remains one today. The Soviet Union was an empire, whose interests included violently suppressing the social and democratic agency of the people within (and often without) the empire
12:40 this wasnt their strategy as depicted in COD, its more a myth. There were instances of that mass charges, but this wasnt happening all the time, especially late war (1943) they used the deep battle doctrine. But correct me if im wrong.
Mongolia bought a crap ton of these boots. And have seen estimates of there being over 100 million pairs of kirza boots being Made over the decades. Its a great material
The author constantly says that the Russians threw bodies at the enemies. This indicates a low level of knowledge about the war on the Eastern Front. It is enough to study the proportions of Russian losses in that war - of the 27 million dead, 17 million were civilians killed during the German genocide. The ratio of Soviet and German military losses is about 1:1.3, which does not look like "they filled up enemies with corpses."
The Soviet army sent people into battle without weapons only in call of duty and bad films. At the beginning of the war, the USSR had more self-loading rifles than the Nazis.
The problem was not having rifles. The problem was getting them to the front, alongside ammunition and everything else. Soviet logistics struggled at times, men could be issued insufficient rifles, tanks could be out of fuel or go with limited ammunition.
Also the USSR was on the defensive most of the time, and defenders as a very rough rule of thumb have a 1 to 3 advantage. Which makes the real 1.3 to 1 ratio look especially bad.
One of the most important features omitted here is that these boots were designed to be combined with foot wraps instead of socks. Wraps suffer no holes (one of the worst feet killers are wet socks with holes) and are far cheaper and easier to produce, and have advantages against most socks (greater heat insulation etc.). Only best tactical boots with modern membrane and lacing can compete with them. This is why a modern equivalent costs tenfold more with minimal advantages over kirza boots.
I've got a pair of those, purchased from old Soviet stocks. I use them as my "burner" boots, for gardening, garage work, and everything muddy and wet when the comfort of my normal more modern boots isn't mandatory (swamp trekking, offroading in deep mud etc). They're indeed unimaginably durable, because they're oversized and I wear them with double woolen socks (originally footwraps would be used) they're comfortable even when full of water after a thigh-deep water crossing, they also dry very fast for a leather boot and protect you from creepy crawlies etc because of their height. The only downside is because the soles are so damn f*cking hard, almost inflexible, you absolutely need some cushioning insoles, and even then your back and ass will suffer on the pavement. This is why I don't wear these daily. Thank you for these amazing videos, history of military footwear is very important yet often neglected
Most of the rural Russian soldiers had home knitted thick woolen socks in addition to the foot wrappings. The wool socks prevented their feet from freezing in the cold Russian winters and did not cause sweating like other materials.
Wow! I love how you took the time to dive into the history of Russia and how the boot played a role!! It would be cool to own a pair someday! Great video!👏👏
Что же можно сказать о сапогах и портянках, если смотреть на них глазами профессионала? В первую очередь, при ношении ботинок необходимо иметь носки. Носить портянки с ботинками просто невозможно. А вот сапоги можно носить как с носками, так и с портянками. Стоимость носков значительно выше, да и изнашиваются они быстрее. Нужно подобрать каждому солдату тот размер, который подходит ему. Как только носки намокнут, необходимо сразу поменять их, пока ноги не покрылись мозолями. А в масштабах целой армии решить эти проблемы довольно непросто. Ведь носочные фабрики просто не могут снабжать армию таким количеством носков, какое необходимо. Особенно если говорить про военное время. Зато портянки не имеют размера, а кроме того - их можно изготовить за несколько минут, просто взяв кусок любой ткани. Если портянки промокли. Можно снять их, перемотать другим концом, после чего ноги снова окажутся в тепле и сухости, в то время как мокрый край будет сохнуть на лодыжке. Таким образом, нося портянки, солдат значительно меньше зависит от органов снабжения, чем солдат предпочитающий носки. Конечно, армейская вещевая служба сможет гораздо легче найти то количество ткани, которое нужно для портянок, чем для носков. Что же можно сказать о сапогах? Благодаря высокому голенищу, сапог может защитить ногу от ожогов, травм и любых других повреждений ногу почти до колена. Ботинки же не могут похвастать этим. Также сапог защищает от сырости. Достаточно пройтись по мокрой траве рано утром в простых ботинках, чтобы почувствовать - брюки промокли до колена. А вот сапоги защитят от такой неприятности, как мокрые брюки. В них можно форсировать глубокую лужу или мелкий ручей. Надеть сапоги можно гораздо быстрее, чем ботинки. Очень полезным является и то, что на них нет шнурков, которые регулярно рвутся Возможно человеку, которому приходится ходить только по паркету, будет тяжело понять и оценить перечисленные выше плюсы сапог. А вот простой офицер или солдат, которого судьба занесла на Кавказ, довольно сложно вовремя менять носки и сушить ботинки. Стоит помнить и о том, что мокрая обувь является не только причиной серьезных мозолей, но и повышает количество простудных заболеваний. А уже такая бытовая мелочь (не мелочь это, вовсе не мелочь!) может стать причиной падения морального настроя воюющего солдата.
Certainly not 'worst boot of WW2'. It did it's job well and is more practical than most others, especially in winter conditions; were this boot would prevail. Without the Red army or their boots, he would not be here to complain about them.
I mean can you blame the guy considering the recent Russian tactics? It's honestly made me reconsider that meat waves and blocking troops of the USSR was a myth considering that that is the very strategy the Moscow regime currently employs
on the eastern front German soldiers suffered terribly with trench foot and frostbite of the feet, the Russians didn't, mainly due to no steel studs in the sole transferring cold through the sole but also due to the fact the Russian boot fared much better in wet conditions, and army marches on its feet, not its stomach contrary to popular belief.
Your criteria for the best/worst ww2 boots is beyond ridiculous. All other laced boots with socks were useless on the eastern front as they were extremely slow to put on/off; slow at marching; useless in heat, freeze, rain and snow, mud, sand and swim. Not to mention the logistical nightmare of replacing socks every two weeks. Kirza boots passed all of the above with flying colors. Empirically the best boots of ww2
Ignoring that Soviet troops also had lace up boots with putter along side these at near 1.5:1 low boot to high. There's a reason we don't use this type of not anymore.
Kirza boots are like T 34 tanks, unrefined, quick to produce, innovative, and easy to repair. I really liked this video because it gives a historical perspective of the problem of equipping what at that time was the population of entire countries with footwear. Even the very fact that Soviet soldiers were not given socks, but two pieces of cloth with which they wrapped their feet and which in summer allowed ventilation and prevented the foot from cooking and in winter created pockets of hot air for avoid frostbite of the feet. . Not to mention avoiding abrasions from both the lining material and the nails with which the boot was built. Plus they look great. YuoTube comrades return the money, respect the rules of capitalism
@agnozis а если времени чуть побольше есть, чем просто перемотаться, то наматывали портянку вокруг голенища сапога, и к костерку ставили. А если учесть, что портянки почти у всех запасные были, то сухими перематывались, а мокрые можно было на себя намотать, под форму. На теле оно всë быстрее сохло)). Я портянки стирал перед отбоем, и клал под матрас, на сетку, чтоб не потерялись случайно🤣
@agnozis не, у меня не было... Я вообще большую часть времени ездил за рулëм в гражданской одежде🤣🤣🤣. Но на КМБ и во время строевых смотров - кирзачи и портянки онли)).
Im 100% sure all british soldiers fighting in trenches in WW1 would replace their leather boots for those soviet ones, so they don't get trench foot as such massive scale. Not to mention they are half as heavy than the leather ones
For Russian winters spent in the trenches with minimal access to supplies, I think I'd take these over the other WW2 boots. Especially with linen foot wraps instead of wool socks.
There was two types of that what you call linen foot wraps: regular, for spring and summer and winter ones, for cold part of the year. Winter wraps was made from much more thiker and warmer material. We call them portyankee))).
My father is a dirt poor peasant's son, he was actually born in the mountains while his family was running from SS division murdering a whole region, he spent his whole childhood wearing basic leather moccasin-like shoes in winter only, the rest of the year walking bare footed, and he absolutely hated those army foot wraps during his conscription. He said he would "cheat" and wear wool socks his mother hand-made instead.
Completely love your videos and watch every one. You make history real and you highlight that quality is important in our disposable world. Well done and keep up the great work.
12:40 - man, please have some respect for history and civilians killed by nazis! Axis had more army when they attack, something like 5 mil against 3.5 mil Red Army. Yes, more than 34 mil were mobilized against 22-24 mil of Axis soldiers. And total army death count is like 8 mils for Red Army and about 6 mils for Axis. Keep in mind, that you will loose much more when attacking. So no one it just throwing bodies. You are joking about 18 000 000 dead civilians, how fun is that. About that boot. Do you know it's not made for socks? only footcloth. Footcloth is cheap, you can make one in a field, if needed.
I would like to personally thank you for the deepness of your research. If I had to do it I wouldn't have reached this level of detail that you put. Bravo, Bravo!
Soviet doctrine demanded stockpiling as well post WW2. The Soviets learned how important with modern mechanized warfare that factories and resources could be over run in little time. Especially being a land based power. There were no oceans to have as barriers. Therefore stock piling was essential. Stockpiling meant mass production wich meant simpler and cheaper designs were vital. This became even more true during the nuclear age where entire cities,factories and production would naturally be targeted within minutes. Therefore mass production of weapons and equipment beforehand was necessary and wise. Dispersed to depots and bunkers before a potential conflict assured that even with factories and production destroyed, there would be be enough stockpiled supplies to continue fighting. So yes. Quality wasn't the best but that wasn't the strategy or goal,simply equipping millions of men after a huge conflict started was. So the term "Soviet junk" is often misunderstood. Yes and no.
I’d like to see you examine a pair of British Army DMS (Directly Moulded Sole) boots that were used from the 1950s to the 80s and were hated as far as I know, they’re cheap and easy to find. I own a pair from 1980, they’re not the worst things I’ve ever worn but certainly not the best, either.
On my book you have permission to cut ANYTHING footwear related in half, this channel is history itself being preserved! And it's a way to celebrate every single shoe that comes to your hands as well! Ive been here since your Vans video, and got instantly addicted! I hope to see some more vans models overtime as well (I really wanna see what they've done different in some shoes like the Wayvees and the Knu Skools)
Russia had 4 million troops in its army in 1914 everyone in Europe had large armies at the time. By the end of the war each country fielded over 7 million men each. 60 million men saw combat. 9 million died. Russia alone lost almost 3 million. Estimates counting civilians for that war and revolution is around 10 million depending who you ask. We heavily downplay WW1 in America.
The events of WW1 had a huge impact on WW2. I think we could do a better job of displaying it as well. It was an important war that affected the lives of hundreds of millions of people
We do not "down play" WW1 in the U.S., we just simply weren't involved with most of it. You also don't learn much about the Russo-Japanese war, or the Crimean war for the same reason, just as people in Europe probably don't study much about the Mexico campaign, the Spanish American War or the Civil War and reconstruction. It's a matter of perspective, not suppression. I do wish there was more emphasis on it, but do to the political side coming out for the last half century schools avoid anything approaching modern history.
@sinisterthoughts2896 thank you for further proving the point by listing a bunch of examples of events that don't get exposure in the U.S. the seriousness of these events deserves much more attention.
Its to not let the Goyim know about the Russian Revolution, Lend Lease, and why Ayn Rand, Mises, Fink, Greenblatt, Mayorkas, Blinken are in the country as Spies. And somehow didnt get Dutch Ovened lol.. Cant have it both ways.. Cant be a marginalized group and have a Israeli Junta, and Oligarchy... Youll get your kids taken away like Yeezy... Its too bad Mean Mr Mustache didnt invade Russia sooner... Thankfully the Russikis know now and are "De Mr Mustashing" Ukraine and their Israeli Oligarch...
You should keep a angle grinder with a cuttoff wheel on hand for when you hit nails/shanks. Have you tried a carbide tooth bandsaw blade? That might work good as long as you keep it cool.
10:43 As someone living in a country that had been under Japanese occupation (arguably the four worst years in four centuries of occupation by various foreign powers here; the garden across the road from the house I grew up was used as an execution ground), I'm not sure how I'd feel about walking around in replicas of Japanese WWII boots. Cool project I guess...
Get 20% off Every Man Jack with code ROSE20 here: www.everymanjack.com/?Rose+Anvil&RUclips
Props to them for willing to be at the end of the video. That face lotion sounds nice
@@joeybaseball7352 It's shown in the statistics
You're not looking at why they needed a light water proof boot, the kind of muddy wet ground that the Soviets were fighting demanded those specs
@@joeybaseball7352 well, i see somewhere. Maybe its in the RUclips studio application
@@joeybaseball7352 you’re off on this one, there is a detailed “audience retention” graph that helps us creators see what parts of the video people watch. RUclips doesn’t talk much about it so most people haven’t heard of it.
When I was a soldier in 1987 - 1989, I wore such boots. At first they seemed uncomfortable to me and rubbed my feets. Around the spring of 1988, we were given high-laced boots. Having tried all the options, we returned to the old boots. These boots are not hot in summer and not cold in winter, they do not get wet in the rain. Until now, somewhere on the balcony I have a pair of such boots.
Взадницу кирзу, служил в тоже время, испортилсебе ступни.
@@VolodymyrKostenko-q1m а если Залужный перемогу не организует, то какие планы на 24й? Просто радi любопытства.
@@VolodymyrKostenko-q1m как-то некрасиво называть свою страну улусом, Володимир, но на вопрос-то вы так i не ответили? если вдруг? то какие планы на 24й-то?
how are they on hard surface, rocks,.. etc?
@@sjoormen1they are good boots, and last a long time. It takes feet time to get used to them. When starting military service, sudden everyday use the city boys that never wore boots would have finger nails come off, pieces of skin rub off, bloody feet and was a nightmare. This was the boot of the villages and a lot of people working dirty jobs.
I used those Kirza boots in the Army in early 90s. We had plenty of modern boots, but used Kirza for some daily work and duty in the fields. To say the least, I was amazed how comfortable and practical they were when you work in trenches, dirt, high grass and similar environments. Especially when you know how to use it with footcloth. Also, despite simplicity, those boots had a lot of killer features - they were light, reliable, easy to maintain, protected and stabilized the foot and it was super-easy to keep your feet dry. Only best tactical boots with modern lacing and Goretex can compete with them.
So I understand why Kirza boots were used for more than a century.
Мне тоже довелось носить кирзу с портянкой после берцев и носков, и честно говоря, возвращаться к берцам после этого не хотелось совершенно, а особенно возвращаться к вонючим носкам) В кирзу можно быстро вкинуться и быстро их снять при необходимости ( что не раз пригождалось в наряде)). Единственный минус у кирзы, что я выявил - в них неудобно бегать и маневрировать, они тяжелее берцев. Во всем остальном - одни плюсы
which army?
What are footwraps? Why are they better than socks?
@@johnweiland9389 they're better because they're cheaper and easier to make, more durable, and can dry better.
@@johnweiland9389 rectangular pieces of cloth that are worn wrapped around the feet to avoid chafing. Footwraps are also quicker to dry than socks and are more resistant to wear and tear: any holes can be compensated for by re-wrapping the cloth in a different position.
The officers had leather jack boots. Kirza boots were for the lower ranks. Either kind of these boots were worn without socks. Instead of socks each foot would be wrapped with a strip of linen or cotton fabric in a such way that would make these boots quite comfortable to wear. When part of the fabric strip gets wet from sweat, the foot gets rewrapped so the dry end wraps around the foot while the wet end is wrapped around the crus to dry out. Due to water resistance, these boots could also be used as a vessel.
@Kelly Harbeson носки у нас умели шить, даже при советах, просто это настолько плохая обувь, что если носить её с носками вместо портянок, ноги превратятся в фарш, это такая советская магия
Can only imagine what those rags smelled like after being pinned down in Stalingrad for a month or two.
@@juslitor oof
I collect Soviet stuff and do reenactment, the foot wraps are more of a thick flannel material and make these boots actually pretty comfortable to wear, in fact I’ll use these when shoving snow in the winter and with wool socks and foot wraps theses stay nice and warm and work great
@@juslitor they can be washed and dry in 15 minutes if you know how.
I don't think you understand war boots enough, because these are some of the best. These boots didn't get hot in the summer, and didn't get too cold in the winter-they're kind of comfortable, too and THEY ARE COMPLETELY WATER TIGHT.
In a warzone, when you're marching for miles/fighting in wet, muddy trenches, walking through boggy fields and unpaved, muddy roads after artillery has bombed them and tanks drove through, being watertight is far more important than being resistant to fire; fire is not that common, can be avoided most of the time, meanwhile, the rain doesn't stop, the rainy, muddy, sloshy weather of September/October til April doesn't stop the fighting, the fighting doesn't stop if you're in a foxhole pinned down for hours with water seeping in.
If it wasn't for these boots being water-tight, millions more would be dead/with amputated feet/out of action due to trenchfoot.
Very true.
Spot on. The dude in the clip has zero understanding of the nature of infantry warfare. He even has a pair of PERFECT all-season cross-country infantry boots in his hands, and still fails to understand, declaring them "the worst" compared to some total junk you would NEVER want to wear in a field / mud, and only citing cost benefit.
This dude probably wouldn’t last a couple of days on the snow fighting in the trenches without crying for a latte because his hands and feet are too cold;🤣🤣….if these boots are water tight and insulated in the inside they certainly are good enough for me.😂🎉🎉🇷🇺🇺🇸🤣
Watertight is highly important, you’re absolutely correct!
Are you guys surprised? Not calling anything from Russia cheap junk is an easy way to get a swarm of Russophobes accusing you of being a Kremlin bot who sold his soul to Putin, or whatever. That, and many Westerners just have an extraordinarily deep seated anti-Russia bias.
I was in the British military in the 1980s and 1990s our military and our boots were pretty good. I married an Estonian woman and used to do work at their country house on the property in Tabasalu, Estonia. I used a pair of those Russian boots and they were really quality items hard wearing and superbly comfortable. The quality of the leather and lining was just excellent. I totally understand why they would have kept them that style and for so long.
J+s franklin boots
They aren't leather
@@wirelessone2986 I know, but it's just imitation, but it is good whatever it was.I was not sure what to call it. Maybe you know the correct word?
@@wirelessone2986 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirza Here you are not leather, but I would say better than leather.
I heard a story of a Soviet soldier who got boots two sizes too big. His comrades thought he was mad, and a pain in the *** in the rain when he would get stuck in the mud. However, come the winter, he stuffed his boots with newspaper and had the warmest feet in the regiment.
Normal practice. Usually they took a size larger, not two. If the boots are two sizes too big, then you will knock your legs off.
Yep, I have a pair of 80s model officer boots, one and a half size bigger, i put height insoles, plus thicker socks. So warm and comfier and easier to walk on.
Stuffing footwear with paper is known survival technique
Зимой в советской армии, выдавали " валенки"
САПОГИ НЕ ,,НАБИВАЛИ,, - ГАЗЕТАМИ ОБВОРАЧИВАЛИ ГОЛУЮ НОГУ , А СВЕРХУ ОБВОРАЧИВАЛИ ,,ПОРТЯНКОЙ,, - ПОЛОСКО Х/Б ТКАНИ 40×70см. ( ПРАВИЛЬНО НАМОТАТЬ ,,ЦЕЛАЯ НАУКА,, 🤔☝️🤨😜)
I served in 2010, in the military registration and enlistment office we were given military boots along with a uniform. During the first week of the "young fighter course" in the military unit, some guys wore their legs very badly, and then we were given kirza boots with footcloths, my legs felt so blissful then that I still remember it, how great it was compared to high-top boots and socks = )
В керзовом сапоге у тебя бы давно стерлась нога
@@мишкатоптыжка-в1жнеа
@@мишкатоптыжка-в1ж Разобравшись как наматывать портянки без складок - очень даже не обязательно. Даже я, бывший в армии всего лишь на сборах, бегал в них марш броски по 20 км без особых последствий
@@dmitripogosian5084 тож знаю о чем говорю . У меня тож пацаны находили норм в сапогах , мне же не повезло и дело не в намотке
@@dmitripogosian5084 сапог это нищенство , спецыально для руской армии
My father was an officer in the Soviet army in 1980-s, he said that although officers were issued cooler full-leather boots, many of them would still prefer kirza boots for being lighter. He brought a few pairs home, I would occasionally wear them when doing chores around our village house - didn't like them much, mostly because the "shoe" part was completely stiff, and putting them on was giving me some kind of "foot claustrophobia" (e. g. the feeling that I maybe shouldn't put my foot into that, because it's unclear whether I will be able to get it back out). I didn't bother with footwraps, would just put several cotton socks on each foot, and then a thick wool sock on top of that if the weather was cold.
Do they smell like eggs?
@@Eduardo_Espinoza This version did not contain egg so why would it smell like egg?
@@Eduardo_Espinoza No, not at all.
I have 2 different versions? One pair looks just like the ones in the video, the other are not "flat" over the toes but has more space over them. Use them in the winter driving my tractor and when driving motorcycles. I fixed the "nail problem" with a pair of thick wool soles. You are right. The rubber gets a bit stiff and slippery after a couple of decades.
I love how he adds the entire history around the boots. Makes me super interested in history!
As someone who knows quite a bit about WW2 and really enjoy reading about it. The boots is something I never thought about learning about.
@@Plague_Doc22 The focus is usually on the footwraps, so the boots are easy to overlook.
@TastingHistory is a good channel here on RUclips
looks like he completley skipped part where russia with germany attack poland and russia with germany were allies with plan to split lands called ribbetropp molotow. And then they occupied my country to 1993 where for rest of the world war end in 1945.
@@will-o-the-wisp-witch And everyone's favorite: Weird History
This was very interesting to me. My mother was employed by The Florsheim Shoe Company in Chicago, Illinois when WWII ended, and she told me that on the day they were informed that the war in Europe was over, that the manager of the factory was upset that his contracts would be canceled. He was not too popular with the ladies working there who had family members fighting in that war.
That's just the nature of war under capitalism, it's not about survival (most of the times), it's all about supplying the government and leeching away the tax money from everyone else, even the guys getting killed out there to keep you safe.
No kidding....now of the war production factories where my mother worked she never mentioned that one. Just Motorola and we'll Precious Metal? Or something where she made machine gun mounts for bombers. And she had three brothers in the service. In WW-2.
I remember wearing one of these in 2011, while serving in the army.
Mine hade a glued on sole, and most of the guys from my squad changed their combat boots for this type of footwear, as it fits better for the hot climate.
Also, you can easily take them off while having a break on a speed march, what made them really popular among soldiers.
Thanks for the video!
are you out now?
@@MsZsc yes, I was out almost a decade ago.
@@Nikita_Random that's good
I owned the East German copies (basically the same boots issued to East Germany from the 50's to the 80's). They were fairly indestructible, hard on your feet with or without socks, waterproof. Very plain outside of them being high boots.
the standart is footcloths, not socks )) . Try it, it is far better.
@@vasiliypoopkeen7954 I actually tried the wrap and socks and bare feet. Socks and the wrap was similar.
The East German Army , the NVA used Leather boots for the conscripts that were essentially copies of the March Jackboots for the lower enlisted personnel and the cadre NCO's and Officers had slightly taller leather boots.
@@MrHrKaidoOjamaaVKJV The ones from Sportsman's Guide East German Surplus boots were identical to the Russian boots with the cotton canvas coated type material.
@exexpat11
Those from the Sportsman's Guide were not genuine, not the real deal.
I know I wore the real deal in the Estonian Defense Forces in the early 1990's
These boots, at least for me, make for encredably good work and walking boots particularly for the price.
There aren't many places where you can get knee high boots with durable soles in for $80.
They are also encredably comfortably when you use footwraps with them since in my experience they fill out the boot better and allow sweat to wick away alot easier.
right you are
Where do you get these kinds of boots?
@@lazzie7495 I got mine from a Russian military surplus site. It's one of the first results you get when you type it Google.
They use European sizing rather than the Soviet one to be clear.
want to add footwrap material plays a big role, it should be thick soft cotton preferably with wool, like flannel
@@Timsturbs indeed, although linen works very well too for more tropical environments. I use the German method that is cotton footwraps with wool socks for most conditions.
The wool sock providing warmth and the foot wraps for durability.
Sore feet, the nightmare of infantrymen . Those boots adresses two of the most important issues of walking miles over miles : weight and dryness .
Lesson learned from my time in the French marine infantry (2ème RIMA regiment)
I wore those boots during my militeraized service (emercom) in years 2002-2005, as an old colleague gave me his old style boots which were too small for him and told me not to wear the new-style boots with laces. I was very satisfied, as I could put them on in a second during the night shifts and could come into rather deep water or mud with them. I used to climb, jog and jump in these boots without any problems. do not see any problems in using these boot with the tissue instead of socks. cheers from Russia!
Здравия желаю товарищу по службе в мчс :) Месяц назад дмб из ногинска. Сейчас выдают берцы фарадей / парижская комунна удивительная обувь которая согревает ногу в 30 градусную жару и охлаждает зимой помимо того что модели которые выдают ещё и самые дешёвые и неудобные в которых ходишь скрипя как сквидварт и при скользишь на любом льду.
@@АндрейЛазутин-ы8цпоржал в голос 😂😂😂
It might be on the lower side of reliability and quality, but if they really are lighter and more waterproof than the other boots, I'd take them.
Having wet feet at war times, especially in the Russian winter, is life threatening. And having to walk with heavy boots packed with snow or mud is extremely fatiguing, considering the huge distances the soldier had to walk during the later stages of the war.
Tend to agree. The comments section reveals they were worn with footwraps and not socks and so I presume that helped solve the insulation issue to an extent as well.
@@jackmacfakie1387 портянки носили вместо носков как более надежное средство, так как носки в таких сапогах, да и вообще в сапогах снашиваются буквально за 2 часа. Занимался в свое время военно исторической реконструкцией РККА, ходил и в ботинках кожаных с обмотками и сапогах кожаных и кирзовых, кирзовые сапоги наиболее универсальны.
In the Soviet Army frostbite was a criminal offence in WWII, it meant being derelict in following ones training
@@jackmacfakie1387 And properly wrapped footwraps stabilized the lower leg. Also somehow decreased sweating, perhaps by giving airy cushion or just having more absorbent volume. Natural fibre socks will die in such a boot after couple of hours of running. And synthetic fiber was not suitable for long wear until fairly recently.
I wore those shoes in Soviet Army at the end of 1980's. It is not just a boot. IT is the whole system of tightly wrapped around a foot piece of cloth, called Portianka. If your foot gets wet or sweaty you can wrap your foot with the another side, while wet part dries as you continue walking. When you sleep, you wrap the cloth around the boot and let it and the boot dry up.
Becides the lighter weight, you don't have to worry about socks to carry spares. As per fire resistance, It never even crossed my mind, as it never been a problem.
Last, these boots saved lots of lives, as it takes split second to put them on, no shoe laces to worry, no socks to put, just put a cloth over the boot and slide the foot into the boot. Cheap and light does not mean it is bad, it did the job it was designed for. And I completely disagree with western and German propaganda that Soviet leaders just threw the bodies at any problem. It is especially very visible when Soviet union started war against Japan. With relatively few troops Red Army was way more successful in destroying Japanese Imperial Army that was occupying China, Korea, Sakhalin and Kurils
Respect to you, my friend. The USSR steamedrolled the Japanese in Manchuria while the US were struggling with their island hop.
The west tends to attribute "throwing bodies" to anyone they don't like.
Soviet losses and USA losses speak volume about two different battle philosophies - USSR lost 10x more
@@dxq3647 USSR lost 10x more. Look at Russian invasion into Ukraine, Russ fight like Russo-Finnish war
@@borghorsa1902 Until you look at the details and compare apples to apples. Against Japan Americans lost way more troops while fighting for just a few islands in Pacific. uSSR defeated largest, industrial area in Manchuria which had largest Japanese Force.
USSR Red Army lost most troops in 1941-1942. At the time when German Army was the strongest and most capable. Yes lots of losses killed, taken POWs. The largest losses were due to criminal treatment of Soviet POWs.
It is the established fact that for German troops Eastern front was the same thing Bakhmut was to Ukranian troops
Spot on about the propaganda narrative. The whole video reeks of historical illiteracy.
As a person that has 3 pairs of these boots.
They are very durable all weather boots, and great for outdoors and even horse riding. Down side, they do take very long to break in and can be very uncomfortable at first. But with proper boot socks and time it becomes very comfortable.
The water proof quality of the boot is what is the most important factor to me. And light weight.
Weight equals lbs, lbs quality pain.
Having a water proof boot is far better to have in Eastern Europe too as most of eastern Europe is a bog, swamp and hill grassland.
So I wouldn't say it is a bad boot, it is a great boot for the area it is designed. You want a light boot in a bog and swamp as it is easier to get out of mud versus a heavy boot.
I think they work great when riding motorcycles. And, as you say, they keep water away for a long time. They are easy to dry too!
You wear them with socks, not foot wraps as is proper?! You /heretic/!
Что ты такое несёшь, чёрт возьми !? "Большая часть это болото и трясина" процентов 20 это большая часть !?
I do wwii soviet reenacting and i can guarantee these boots are quite comfortable and versatile.
With footwraps they fit quite snug and are easy to repair as im a cobbler and have torn a few open
same here, one event i was stuck in a stream for 10-15 mins. my feet stayed bone dry. much better than my usgi boots lol
As reenactor who got his hands on british, american and russian kits i can tell with full confidence - boots from all sides have their own strenghs and weaknesses. Soviet jackboots so far lightests and waterproof. American - most comfortable. British - you can go on any dangerous and slippery surface and not fall - nails will chew into anything.
It is absolutely the best most practical ugly war-boot in the world, knee deep in mud, water, wet snow. Just imagine tiying fancy bootlaces with frozen hands or in the mud, having wet socks, and wet heavy soaked leather, only ankle high... and so on. Think.
I love looking at historical trade offs like this. Seeing what decisions were made and why, and ultimately the outcomes of those choices. We can learn so much from seeing what has already been tried. Thank you for doing these sorts of videos.
He was wrong about the human wave tactics ruclips.net/video/_7BE8CsM9ds/видео.html
I wish you would have elaborated more on Portyanki. Theyre a really important part of the usage and identity of these boots.
Lars (Survival Russia) has some good videos, where he points out how they can be better than socks!
@@petesheppard1709 Yeah. Portyanki are awesome. I've been hiking and bushcrafting in these boots for a few years, i definitely see the Kirza above the leather tearing at some point but they've been amazing boots. If they break I'll just get another pair. They don't feel cheap or poorly made, but easily replacing them if they were damaged was part of the whole reason why they were designed the way they were to be mass produced. They're great boots. They fill the role well and if they break, replace them and keep going lol
I'd rather wear these over riding boots or muck boots any day. They're too much fun. They feel really nice too. And I've jogged in them before and they don't feel bad at all. They're just different.
The German soldiers preferrred "Fußlappen" over socks too.
@@adumbratus4148 Yeah. Fußlappen are awesome
My father served in the Yugoslav Army in the early 1950s. He told me they were issued socks and foot-wraps. They used the socks while on base but when they were out in the field they used the foot-wraps. My father claimed that when foot-wraps were properly used you could march for miles and never get a blister.
the Kirza is great because you can make a bigass jack boot which is perfect for the deep snow and mud you will often run into in Russia, but it's not excessively heavy.
I remember my military training - one of our guys got a foot blister, whose old school boots were the only thing which could help him stay mobile
My first pair of kirza boots was with LEATHER heel. It was 1987 BTW. After initial break-in period they were quite comfortable, if heavy, and careful wrapping of the foot was not necessary - simply place foot wrap on top and push your foot in (socks are necessary for this trick). After 4 months in boot camp and training center I upgraded them to officer version (all-leather, shorter, lighter, rubber sole) and woolen socks since it was far North and we were Navy after all :). Logically working boots (called gady) should be issued to sailors instead of jackboots but I newer got mine. Instead I purchased extra pair of dress boots and was wearing them with socks when on shore. On board everybody was wearing legendary perforated submarine slippers :)
Is it true that those perforated submarine slippers were introduced in the navy only after an admiral visited a ship, promptly slipped and cracked his head open?
Worst boot? I've worn out at least two pairs of them. I love them. I've worn them with both socks and footwraps. Because they (or the footwraps) are not tight, they don't restrict blood flow to the feet, meaning your feet don't get so cold in cold weather, and in the heat, your feet don't sweat so bad, because they are loose enough for sweat to more easily escape. Easy to get on and off - you can't say that about the WWII US Army lace up boot with those blasted gaiters.
It was reported that when Russia switched from the Kirza jackboot to the low lace-up boots the General officers were quoted as saying, "Wait until the spring floods come the soldiers will wish they had Kirza boots".
I absolutely love these kind of videos Weston. Please keep doing these more historical boots. They're super fun.
My greatgrandfather wore his own, self made leather boots in ww2 and this situation was quite common.Soviet people in this days make many things by they own hands. If they need something on the front, and army have no suplies, they made it! If the take bad items they make them beter, upgrade it. Greatgrandfather can make boots, horse harness, even wooden house, etc etc
I do little bit of "airsoft reenactment" and I wore these during the 5 hour game in melting snow and ankle deep mud, a lot of running, jumping around, in total I ran 7km with it.
I had telogrejka- watnik uniform, socks and footwraps( the footwraps were too small so I had to wear socks also) and I was amazed how waterproof they are.
Normaly during games I wear modern combat boots, but these are in fact very light weight which made running feel better.
On the downside, I would not like to have anything heavy fall on my foot because the leather is quite thin.
My feet were completely dry and if I know how to wrap the footwraps better, not like a halfwit my feet would feel little bit less sore.
I plan to buy proper footwraps and test it for some 10+ km march in summer to see if my fingers would fall off or not :D
It’s also important to mention that it’s worn with foot wraps and not socks, it makes a huge difference
The kirza boots are also very easy and quick to put on. Also in around a month of wearing they change their shape exactly to your feet and become quite comfortable. I never had any problems with nails when I was in Soviet army, like feeling them. And especially during the WW2 russian soldiers had to walk enormous distanses, when the roads turn to mud, and that is what thouse boots are really made for.
Thank you. I used to wear KIRza combat boots when I was I kid, it is very bad in the cold weather. But they were nearly indestructible. Also you the army “became” red only after 1017 revolution, befor that it was just a Russian army :) thumbs up!
In a cold weather you need to replace footwraps with a warm ones
I’m really glad you added the stats about views versus museum visits. I work in museums. It’s a perpetual problem. And then does anyone actually pay attention when they are there….I’m so pleased to see videos like this reaching so people who are just sat at home and haven’t had to even travel and negotiate the terrible cafe! It’s a great way of getting meaningful history to people, and telling a story and interacting with an object is much more accessible than sticking something in a case and having a label next to it. We are so restricted by how much information we can get across. I work with the objects but the visitors never get to see what I see. They see two lines on a label, and no context. This is far more useful. Thank you.
Try and get your hands on straw insulated winter army boots - massive things. It would be interesting to freeze them too and compare their performance.
I'm surprised that you never mentioned the footwraps and how socks weren't used with kirza boots!
To be presice, in 1914 its wasn't called Red Army, cos it was still Russian Empire, and Red Army was the name of communist army during Civil War and then in thr USSR. Also, Bolshevik revolution (or rather October Socialist revolution) was third, not second, in February sa.ne year was rhe February revolution that put an end to Russian Empire and provisional government was installed, but they failed to meet people's demands, didn't fulfill their promises and didn't stop the war, so then Bolsheviks stepped in and overthrew them.
I find your historical analysis of boots of WWII an amazing analysis! It is such an important piece of kit that just gets overlooked by so many fanboys. If you've ever had to do a road march with your rucksack you are INTIMATELY aware of how good or bad your boots are! Thanks for your efforts to bring light to such a cool part of our history!
Another massive advantage of this construction method, especially given the circumstances: they don't require any industrial machines or electricity. The nailed construction is all handmade and construction could continue even in awful conditions, unlike boots that were made with goodyear welt stitching machines.
Low tech mass produced - yep, sounds like Soviet Russia.
@@jackmacfakie1387 Cope. They went from a backwards agrarian state to parity with the US, the most powerful empire in history, while victims of the holocaust. China has now surpassed you.
You can still buy new ones in Russia, they are very often bought by workers to work at a construction site
Waterproof, light and cheap I'd wear them.
@@jackmacfakie1387I prefer a steel toe in construction .
Soviet army was not devastated - the casualties were the same as of Axis. But 20 million of civilians were killed - they did not wear boots of course.
Служил с 1986 по 88 года, Кирзачи -самая лучшая обувь!!! Находились в тундре - носили при температуре до -50 градусов! Сапоги и две пары портянок и все окей! Потом были в Казахстане при +45 -50 градусов тепла ,одна пара тонких портянок и все окей! КаКИЕ БОТИНКИ? Все они не удобны их надо разнашивать,у кого-то стопа широкая, у кого-то подьем стопы высокий и все этого дико не удобно, отсюда мозоли, натертости и тд ... А Кирзачи одел с портянками и лепота!!! Попробуйте в своих ботинках одеться за 45 секунд!!! Есть у меня сейчас ботиночки от фирмы 5.11 и, что вы думаете? Ну супер просто тащусь - две стельки ,одна пласмассовая другая мягкая ,повторяе форму ноги - ну супер! Одел,был таким довольным пока через час ходьбы не натер на одной ноге мозоль на пятке!!! Сначало не мог понять причину, а потом увидел,что на пядке обуви где проходит шов ниток - получился бугорок из ниток и теперь что не делал все за зря, трет ногу и все! Вот вам и крутая обувь - 150 евро на ветер !!!
Нам-то не гони! В -50 только валенки. В сапогах ноги отморозить недолгое дело.
English calls them both boots but one has laces and the other one is a solid impregnable tube. The latter is far far superior in some cases. The issue on the Eastern Front was not so much fire and snake bites but getting across vast swaths of mud and snow and keeping the foot dry and not frostbitten. That is the main task that is why water resistance is paramount.
in 1984, I was a teenager in the USSR, and I lived in a military town, my parents bought me children's kirza boots in a military store, at first I didn't like them because they were too simple, but after wearing them I got great pleasure from their patency everywhere and superiority in fights with peers. I think the big mistake was the refusal of the army from kirza boots, modern tactical shoes are just a shame.
@@Grisuu Superiority is when you have two blacksmith's hammers on your feet, one blow with a cast-iron boot - the opponent is disabled. Still impenetrable shin protection. Also, when walking through the forest, there is a feeling that the tracks from the t-34 tank are on their feet. At the same time, the boots are light, warm in winter, cool to the foot and dry in summer. For reliability-ideal. The most important thing is that the child has such an opinion! And also, perhaps you didn't know - in the browser from the Yandex search engine, all videos are translated by voice!!! online in your native language, it is extremely convenient. Try.
In the west, we’d call those shit kickers.
Landmines in Afghanistan- its one of the reasons the high-topped boot had to go. Look at the photos of Soviets in Afghanistan and those that could, wore those blue Nike-like sneakers. Land mines were one of the reasons from a medical standpoint. Yes running up and down mountains had a lot to do with it, but if you search the medical reasons it becomes even clearer.
If/when a Soviet trooper stepped onto a landmine the explosive force and super heated air was tunneled up and through the high-topped portion of the boot basically tearing everything off the lower leg. The boot became a chimney.
If stepped on while wearing a low-topped boot or sneaker the explosion from a anti-personnel mine would destroy the foot and maybe some of the lower leg but wearing the boot was risking damaging the knee which is vital in rehabilitation.
Awesome videos-thank you for the history lessons!
Also because they High Boots provided no Ankle Support when climbing through the Mountains.
@@iac4357 that's the only reason , landmine damage on foot wearing boot vs sneakers has no difference and his explanation is a plain myht? Kyrza massive issue is the complete lack of ankle support . they were made to fight in europe plains and mud . Dry mountain leads to thoussands of ankle casualties and greatly diminished the troops mobility . Sneakers remained extremly rare for the whole war , tho some amount managed to get issued laced boots (some with metal crampon ) and such boots remained well liked into chechens war even tho kirza was still majority
I love the historical boot series! It’s awesome getting to learn and see these little thought items that were insanely important but often overlooked.
me too. had to learn about one of the world wars at school and how the allies would cut the frozen legs off german corpses, throw them in an oven for 20 minutes to thaw out, then wear their boots because their own were giving them trenchfoot. I do wonder what were the brand of those boots that made them so valuable.
27 million is the total number
The Soviet Union lost 9 million soldiers in World War II. 16.6 million people were civilians killed by Nazi Germany.
Nazi Germany also lost about 9 million people on the eastern front.
The stories about the heavy losses of the Soviet Red Army are a myth.
And in my opinion tarpaulin boots are one of the best boots. They are comfortable, reliable and can keep your feet safe from many dangers.
Cheap waterproof boot that just worked. Might not be the most comfortable but it was the best boot that the USSR needed at the time. Could have made something fancy but you would have ended up with dudes fighting barefoot. Tall boots are also great in the wet muddy conditions that the Eastern Front was infamous for, a conventional boot would have been pretty horrible in comaprison considering the depth of the mud would have meant mud in you're boots.
The idea that flame resistance and puncture resistance are viewed as being better than water-proofing and weight in this video is comical.
I am very glad that you are not one-sided in your assessment of WWII Russian products and attitudes! Others (probably for political reasons) look down on and slander the Russians. They had maybe 20 years to develop industry after the feudal tsarist system and the intervention of the Western powers. The industrialized British, who dominate the world empire, poke fun at the Russians, who were "wiped off the map" by the Germans in both wars. Without the USA, there would be no GB today. What are they talking about and on what basis? I'm not a "Russian fan", I just hate when they judge anything one-sidedly!
I read a book about the battle of the bulge, and there apparently were some German troops who had previously fought the Russians on the eastern front who had been transferred to the eastern front that were found wearing these Russian boots. So I’d say they might’ve been pretty damn good boots to have made it all the way between fronts.
Lower part is most important and it is leather + rubber, upper only keep water out and for that purpose works.
Boots are light what is another plus if you wear them almost all the time.
In short, perfect war boots.
Perfect war boots for a poor nation with massive army. Bad boots for the soldiers.
@@Totemparadox No.
@@danijel3227 Yes
@@Totemparadox What exactly is bad or poor or not functional in those boots?
Leather part, synthetic waterproof part, rubber part, nailed together part, light weight part?
Or is it maybe"commie" part that bothers you?
Hm, expert?
@@danijel3227 By all records these are some of the most uncomfortable boots according to people who have used them either in service or civilian life. Also the fact that they're pull ons means they slide on your feet needing extra steps to not get blisters. Also being totally waterproof means your feet become like a swamp.
- Rose Anvil: "This boots is less durable then all WW2 boots."
- Rose Anvil several minutes later: "This boots broke the bandsaw :((."
1:26 The Red Army could not need kirza before 1914 because it (the Red Army) was created only in 1918.
The same reason we Marines in the Vietnam era wore the worst excuses for a boot ever made.
Wore out at an alarming rate, the soles wore down and the boot became useless.
Why?
It was cheap.
Today's military footwear is designed for mechanized troops, those of that period were for long marches, for walking in snow and mud I would have preferred these boots, I think the evaluation should consider the environment of use, In this case, for example compared to the boots of the Germans, the Soviet ones were lighter, waterproof, cheap to produce and a little higher, it seems difficult to argue that they were worse.
During my service in the army 2007-2009, we were given these boots for the first time. We wore them either with party girls or with socks. It was more comfortable in party girls only because of the soft material that was pleasant to the foot and the shoes sat tighter to the foot. We were lucky to find boots from the 40s and 50s. They were very beautiful and virtually immortal. Then everyone finally changed their shoes into shoes, but that's another story ....
What are party girls?
@@elFulberto bad yandex translate probably. He meant portianka.
I have been loving these videos on military boots. You should take a look at some Servis Cheetahs they are infamous for their use by the Taliban, Mujahideen, and even the Afghan security force over the last 40 years.
just googled this. sorry but the taliban has no business walking around with that much drip
@@b.e.e.l.i Inshallah Brother.
The one you cut was a nice pair, the one I got was a cold war variant, cardboard inner soles so the first time I wore them melted the inner soles, dont use socks on them, they will chew through socks within a day, if you wanna make it work with socks replace the inner soles, other than that its waterproof and will do as advertised.
Typical for USSR: Cheap, easy and quick to build.
Also no laces: Muddy terrain is a nightmare for laced boots. But the downside is that there isn't much ankle support
Gotta have kilties
@@wecx2375 Kilties are good but unfortunately they don't protect the laces or eyelets.
And when everything is covered in mud, it takes a long time to take off your shoes and clean it.
Сапоги носили поверх портянок. Сапоги сидели на ноге очень плотно.
I think the light weight and water proofness would be a larger benefit than flame resistance and puncture resistance (of the shaft). It'd be nice if they could be laced though, because I doubt these properly fitted many soldiers.
They are supposed to be worn with footwraps - you can google the word "портянки" and see what I mean - that solve the fitting (and hygiene) problem. Variations for paratroopers had laces on top of the shaft so that boots don't fly off though
12:37 you just contradict yourself. Why taking the trouble to design a waterproof, hardnailed, well waxed boot to shoe bodies just thrown into the battles? Just give them sandals in that case. Why wasting time if your are calculating the soldier wouldn't survive long?
If you ever tried to wear them, they are actually very comfortable when worn properly, e.g. with the cotton linen instead of socks. No clue why you call them the worst. They are lightweight and obviously way better for the mud, as you noted, which actually makes them best infantry boots for the actual combat in Europe, which is all-season and cross-country. And even if the water / mud gets inside, you simply change the linen. They are not for jogging or for the mountains, but they ARE the perfect solution for the real all-season cross-country combat. Try that in your fancy leather boots with bunch of holes for the water / mud to get in.
It's one of the most versatile boots. People still wear them in extreme conditions, where you need to do lots of dirty work and be in mud. I'd rather choose them than some overpriced timberlands
Love the history: military, materials, etc. I think that you have shown that the RIGHT answer for combat boots in WWII might depend on the country and its circumstances. Kind of like tactics and armament. Oh, and rage, rage, ragedy, rage-a-licious, rage-a-mungous. For the al-go-rythm.
Could you do a video on Red Army Valenki boots? They are woolen winter boots used during WW2. Even German and Finnish soldiers used captured Valenki to deal with the cold.
Two issues:
It was not the Russian army in WWII, it was the Red Army or Soviet Army. The Soviet Union was a multiethnic state!
These boots are postwar production. They're very close to wartime, but it's not a proper comparison IMO
Point is you knew exactly what he meant
The Russian army also had various ethnicities in it
Russia pre revolution was a multiethnic state and it remains one today. The Soviet Union was an empire, whose interests included violently suppressing the social and democratic agency of the people within (and often without) the empire
He was not saying Russian army because he did not know they were Soviet Union.
@@willieclark2256There was a Russian Empire before the Soviet Union also. Even proclaimed itself as such.
You're providing an education that helps me in my craft. I'm a novelist, and I never know what I will need to know, you know? Keep 'em coming!
12:40 this wasnt their strategy as depicted in COD, its more a myth. There were instances of that mass charges, but this wasnt happening all the time, especially late war (1943) they used the deep battle doctrine.
But correct me if im wrong.
Remember that they didn't wear socks, they had foot bindings that were probably more comfortable and a lot warmer in Russian winters
The name Kirza is an abbreviation of the name of the factory where they were made, KIRovsky ZAvod (Kirov Factory).
Mongolia bought a crap ton of these boots. And have seen estimates of there being over 100 million pairs of kirza boots being Made over the decades. Its a great material
The author constantly says that the Russians threw bodies at the enemies. This indicates a low level of knowledge about the war on the Eastern Front. It is enough to study the proportions of Russian losses in that war - of the 27 million dead, 17 million were civilians killed during the German genocide. The ratio of Soviet and German military losses is about 1:1.3, which does not look like "they filled up enemies with corpses."
I realize this wasn't the norm, but they did send men into battle without rifles. Hard to see that as anything but throwing bodies at the enemy.
The Soviet army sent people into battle without weapons only in call of duty and bad films. At the beginning of the war, the USSR had more self-loading rifles than the Nazis.
@@ДмитрийАрсланов-б8д just read up more on this. Yeah I was wrong. Sorry about that. Thanks for the info.
The problem was not having rifles. The problem was getting them to the front, alongside ammunition and everything else. Soviet logistics struggled at times, men could be issued insufficient rifles, tanks could be out of fuel or go with limited ammunition.
Also the USSR was on the defensive most of the time, and defenders as a very rough rule of thumb have a 1 to 3 advantage. Which makes the real 1.3 to 1 ratio look especially bad.
One of the most important features omitted here is that these boots were designed to be combined with foot wraps instead of socks. Wraps suffer no holes (one of the worst feet killers are wet socks with holes) and are far cheaper and easier to produce, and have advantages against most socks (greater heat insulation etc.). Only best tactical boots with modern membrane and lacing can compete with them.
This is why a modern equivalent costs tenfold more with minimal advantages over kirza boots.
Happy to hear you are working on ww2 japanese repros. I definitely put myself on the mailing list for that.
I've got a pair of those, purchased from old Soviet stocks. I use them as my "burner" boots, for gardening, garage work, and everything muddy and wet when the comfort of my normal more modern boots isn't mandatory (swamp trekking, offroading in deep mud etc). They're indeed unimaginably durable, because they're oversized and I wear them with double woolen socks (originally footwraps would be used) they're comfortable even when full of water after a thigh-deep water crossing, they also dry very fast for a leather boot and protect you from creepy crawlies etc because of their height. The only downside is because the soles are so damn f*cking hard, almost inflexible, you absolutely need some cushioning insoles, and even then your back and ass will suffer on the pavement. This is why I don't wear these daily.
Thank you for these amazing videos, history of military footwear is very important yet often neglected
Lightweight boots are not joke when you have to ruck 10 miles a day
Right? I served in the Army and I always hated wearing combat boots. 2.5lbs per foot doesn't sound like much, but it is when you're in the field.
@@cat_city2009 1lb on your feet is 5 on your back
Most of the rural Russian soldiers had home knitted thick woolen socks in addition to the foot wrappings. The wool socks prevented their feet from freezing in the cold Russian winters and did not cause sweating like other materials.
Wow! I love how you took the time to dive into the history of Russia and how the boot played a role!! It would be cool to own a pair someday! Great video!👏👏
Что же можно сказать о сапогах и портянках, если смотреть на них глазами профессионала?
В первую очередь, при ношении ботинок необходимо иметь носки. Носить портянки с ботинками просто невозможно. А вот сапоги можно носить как с носками, так и с портянками. Стоимость носков значительно выше, да и изнашиваются они быстрее. Нужно подобрать каждому солдату тот размер, который подходит ему. Как только носки намокнут, необходимо сразу поменять их, пока ноги не покрылись мозолями. А в масштабах целой армии решить эти проблемы довольно непросто.
Ведь носочные фабрики просто не могут снабжать армию таким количеством носков, какое необходимо. Особенно если говорить про военное время. Зато портянки не имеют размера, а кроме того - их можно изготовить за несколько минут, просто взяв кусок любой ткани. Если портянки промокли. Можно снять их, перемотать другим концом, после чего ноги снова окажутся в тепле и сухости, в то время как мокрый край будет сохнуть на лодыжке. Таким образом, нося портянки, солдат значительно меньше зависит от органов снабжения, чем солдат предпочитающий носки. Конечно, армейская вещевая служба сможет гораздо легче найти то количество ткани, которое нужно для портянок, чем для носков.
Что же можно сказать о сапогах? Благодаря высокому голенищу, сапог может защитить ногу от ожогов, травм и любых других повреждений ногу почти до колена. Ботинки же не могут похвастать этим. Также сапог защищает от сырости. Достаточно пройтись по мокрой траве рано утром в простых ботинках, чтобы почувствовать - брюки промокли до колена. А вот сапоги защитят от такой неприятности, как мокрые брюки. В них можно форсировать глубокую лужу или мелкий ручей.
Надеть сапоги можно гораздо быстрее, чем ботинки. Очень полезным является и то, что на них нет шнурков, которые регулярно рвутся
Возможно человеку, которому приходится ходить только по паркету, будет тяжело понять и оценить перечисленные выше плюсы сапог. А вот простой офицер или солдат, которого судьба занесла на Кавказ, довольно сложно вовремя менять носки и сушить ботинки. Стоит помнить и о том, что мокрая обувь является не только причиной серьезных мозолей, но и повышает количество простудных заболеваний. А уже такая бытовая мелочь (не мелочь это, вовсе не мелочь!) может стать причиной падения морального настроя воюющего солдата.
In Finnish army we using almost same two types high boots as part of combat equipment for summer and winter forest.
Certainly not 'worst boot of WW2'. It did it's job well and is more practical than most others, especially in winter conditions; were this boot would prevail. Without the Red army or their boots, he would not be here to complain about them.
Ah yes the famous myth of USSR, just throwing bodies at the enemy until victory. Truly the height of ww2 knowledge.
he’s a boot guy, not a historian
I mean can you blame the guy considering the recent Russian tactics? It's honestly made me reconsider that meat waves and blocking troops of the USSR was a myth considering that that is the very strategy the Moscow regime currently employs
The USA had no real war.
It is kinder garden.
So, their view is funny
It is self zombification
on the eastern front German soldiers suffered terribly with trench foot and frostbite of the feet, the Russians didn't, mainly due to no steel studs in the sole transferring cold through the sole but also due to the fact the Russian boot fared much better in wet conditions, and army marches on its feet, not its stomach contrary to popular belief.
Your criteria for the best/worst ww2 boots is beyond ridiculous. All other laced boots with socks were useless on the eastern front as they were extremely slow to put on/off; slow at marching; useless in heat, freeze, rain and snow, mud, sand and swim. Not to mention the logistical nightmare of replacing socks every two weeks. Kirza boots passed all of the above with flying colors. Empirically the best boots of ww2
Ignoring that Soviet troops also had lace up boots with putter along side these at near 1.5:1 low boot to high.
There's a reason we don't use this type of not anymore.
I still don’t like cutting them apart the historic boots but yours reasons make sense
Kirza boots are like T 34 tanks, unrefined, quick to produce, innovative, and easy to repair. I really liked this video because it gives a historical perspective of the problem of equipping what at that time was the population of entire countries with footwear. Even the very fact that Soviet soldiers were not given socks, but two pieces of cloth with which they wrapped their feet and which in summer allowed ventilation and prevented the foot from cooking and in winter created pockets of hot air for avoid frostbite of the feet. . Not to mention avoiding abrasions from both the lining material and the nails with which the boot was built. Plus they look great. YuoTube comrades return the money, respect the rules of capitalism
Easy to replace
soviets had the best technology but no money
But the man in the video said that those boots could not be repaired. And the T-34 tanks were not easy to repair at all.
Your passion for foot ware makes for quality entertainment… history in foot ware how wonderful,,,good job guys
Hi there! Im russian and i was in army in 2005-2006 and yes, i was wearing kirza boots with portyanki))).
Да, тема портянок тут нераскрыта ) А ведь это важный момент, перемотал сырую портянку другим концом и ноги снова сухие.
@agnozis а если времени чуть побольше есть, чем просто перемотаться, то наматывали портянку вокруг голенища сапога, и к костерку ставили. А если учесть, что портянки почти у всех запасные были, то сухими перематывались, а мокрые можно было на себя намотать, под форму. На теле оно всë быстрее сохло)). Я портянки стирал перед отбоем, и клал под матрас, на сетку, чтоб не потерялись случайно🤣
@@Sergio_Hattifnatt запасные? Не помню такой роскоши ) Зимние, да, были.
@agnozis не, у меня не было... Я вообще большую часть времени ездил за рулëм в гражданской одежде🤣🤣🤣. Но на КМБ и во время строевых смотров - кирзачи и портянки онли)).
Im 100% sure all british soldiers fighting in trenches in WW1 would replace their leather boots for those soviet ones, so they don't get trench foot as such massive scale. Not to mention they are half as heavy than the leather ones
For Russian winters spent in the trenches with minimal access to supplies, I think I'd take these over the other WW2 boots. Especially with linen foot wraps instead of wool socks.
There was two types of that what you call linen foot wraps: regular, for spring and summer and winter ones, for cold part of the year. Winter wraps was made from much more thiker and warmer material.
We call them portyankee))).
For russian winter in trenches you should get wool valenki. If you can wear boots in trenches - that's spring or autumn ))
My father is a dirt poor peasant's son, he was actually born in the mountains while his family was running from SS division murdering a whole region, he spent his whole childhood wearing basic leather moccasin-like shoes in winter only, the rest of the year walking bare footed, and he absolutely hated those army foot wraps during his conscription. He said he would "cheat" and wear wool socks his mother hand-made instead.
Linen is well known for not holding heat, hence why it is prized in warmer climates.
Completely love your videos and watch every one. You make history real and you highlight that quality is important in our disposable world. Well done and keep up the great work.
12:40 - man, please have some respect for history and civilians killed by nazis! Axis had more army when they attack, something like 5 mil against 3.5 mil Red Army. Yes, more than 34 mil were mobilized against 22-24 mil of Axis soldiers. And total army death count is like 8 mils for Red Army and about 6 mils for Axis. Keep in mind, that you will loose much more when attacking. So no one it just throwing bodies. You are joking about 18 000 000 dead civilians, how fun is that.
About that boot. Do you know it's not made for socks? only footcloth. Footcloth is cheap, you can make one in a field, if needed.
I would like to personally thank you for the deepness of your research. If I had to do it I wouldn't have reached this level of detail that you put. Bravo, Bravo!
Soviet doctrine demanded stockpiling as well post WW2. The Soviets learned how important with modern mechanized warfare that factories and resources could be over run in little time. Especially being a land based power. There were no oceans to have as barriers. Therefore stock piling was essential. Stockpiling meant mass production wich meant simpler and cheaper designs were vital. This became even more true during the nuclear age where entire cities,factories and production would naturally be targeted within minutes. Therefore mass production of weapons and equipment beforehand was necessary and wise. Dispersed to depots and bunkers before a potential conflict assured that even with factories and production destroyed, there would be be enough stockpiled supplies to continue fighting. So yes. Quality wasn't the best but that wasn't the strategy or goal,simply equipping millions of men after a huge conflict started was. So the term "Soviet junk" is often misunderstood. Yes and no.
Also, портянки / portyanki / fußlappen / footwraps very good!
I’d like to see you examine a pair of British Army DMS (Directly Moulded Sole) boots that were used from the 1950s to the 80s and were hated as far as I know, they’re cheap and easy to find. I own a pair from 1980, they’re not the worst things I’ve ever worn but certainly not the best, either.
I have around 20 pairs of the NZ version.
@@ek-nz 20 pairs? What are you, a centipede?😂👍
@@numberstation And they’re all different sizes. Not a centipede, a CO. Sometimes the problems are similar.
@@ek-nzthat is a rather witty reply, I commend you.
On my book you have permission to cut ANYTHING footwear related in half, this channel is history itself being preserved! And it's a way to celebrate every single shoe that comes to your hands as well!
Ive been here since your Vans video, and got instantly addicted! I hope to see some more vans models overtime as well (I really wanna see what they've done different in some shoes like the Wayvees and the Knu Skools)
Russia had 4 million troops in its army in 1914 everyone in Europe had large armies at the time. By the end of the war each country fielded over 7 million men each. 60 million men saw combat. 9 million died. Russia alone lost almost 3 million. Estimates counting civilians for that war and revolution is around 10 million depending who you ask. We heavily downplay WW1 in America.
The events of WW1 had a huge impact on WW2. I think we could do a better job of displaying it as well. It was an important war that affected the lives of hundreds of millions of people
We do not "down play" WW1 in the U.S., we just simply weren't involved with most of it. You also don't learn much about the Russo-Japanese war, or the Crimean war for the same reason, just as people in Europe probably don't study much about the Mexico campaign, the Spanish American War or the Civil War and reconstruction. It's a matter of perspective, not suppression. I do wish there was more emphasis on it, but do to the political side coming out for the last half century schools avoid anything approaching modern history.
@sinisterthoughts2896 thank you for further proving the point by listing a bunch of examples of events that don't get exposure in the U.S. the seriousness of these events deserves much more attention.
He spread bullshit about human wave tactics unfortunately ruclips.net/video/_7BE8CsM9ds/видео.html
Its to not let the Goyim know about the Russian Revolution, Lend Lease, and why Ayn Rand, Mises, Fink, Greenblatt, Mayorkas, Blinken are in the country as Spies. And somehow didnt get Dutch Ovened lol..
Cant have it both ways.. Cant be a marginalized group and have a Israeli Junta, and Oligarchy... Youll get your kids taken away like Yeezy...
Its too bad Mean Mr Mustache didnt invade Russia sooner...
Thankfully the Russikis know now and are "De Mr Mustashing" Ukraine and their Israeli Oligarch...
You should keep a angle grinder with a cuttoff wheel on hand for when you hit nails/shanks. Have you tried a carbide tooth bandsaw blade? That might work good as long as you keep it cool.
10:43 As someone living in a country that had been under Japanese occupation (arguably the four worst years in four centuries of occupation by various foreign powers here; the garden across the road from the house I grew up was used as an execution ground), I'm not sure how I'd feel about walking around in replicas of Japanese WWII boots. Cool project I guess...