My ex-husband opened a cell phone account in my name in California, while I lived and worked in Missouri. I had to jump thru flaming hoops to get them to drop their attempt to collect. It was infuriating to have to prove that it wasn't me, when they didn't do their due diligence in opening the account. It happens.
I understand that the system has to take precautions, and sometime it sucks, but there is absolutely no reason we should be accepting the idea that innocent people just have to sit in jail for 15 days before being dragged off to another state and they get no recompense and nobody has to pay for that. Somebody has to pay, like a thousand dollars a day minimum. If it's a cop that screwed up, the cop pays. If it's a DA, the DA pays. A judge, the judge pays. A criminal, the criminal pays, and hell yes if they have no assets make em work it off in prison!
@@trygveskogsholm5963 reality is when those you listed screw up, they don't pay but YOU do and by millions. So many 1st amendment auditors are getting arrested just because cops have egos.... Prosecutors also are corrupt and charge you with whatever the cop says and not watch a single body cam and not realease it.
My Uncle Bob is a retired cop. He told my daughter the same thing as the judge. Men are dogs. Lol. Her Dad wasn't a dog, however! Sadly, he passed away. I hope she finds a man as wonderful as my husband was.
He should have definitely talked to her a little more. She indicated she already had a lawyer in Tennessee after stating earlier she had never been there. It's possible but he should have definitely questioned her a little more to try and determine the truth
Another case where he is unwilling to look at exculpatory video. I watched another case before this judge where a man was accursed of something that could be disproved by viewing video, but the judge declined to view the video, that man had a very good lawyer who continued; to insist that the judge look at the video that the prosecutor had on a laptop in court at that time. When he finally looked at the video, he found no probable cause because the video clearly showed the charges were false. Here he declines to look at video that another judge said existed and kept a woman falsely incarcerated. If video is available that shows she is not the person sought and that could free her, he is a part of the problem if he won't view it.
12:39 He fully explains the situation and how to resolve her issue of having an outstanding bond. He also states he has no access to any video should it exist that would be a matter for later down the line. So I find your comment in this instance on the unfair side. He even offers to look at the situation again should she present further proof when many would just stamp the form and say next.
@@ryansta She doesn't have the video that another judge is aware of and may have seen. This is not about guilt or innocence, it's about identify. An Arizona woman spent time in jail for a warrant issued for a woman in another state that she does not resemble and is 20+ years her junior because they wouldn't look at her ID information.
A teacher in our district was killed by a drunk driver at 3 pm as she was leaving work to go to church. She was the sweetest, kindest person. There is no excuse when ride share services are available.
This is not the court for that. And the ADA should’ve reviewed that evidence before deciding wether or not there was enough evidentiary circumstances to secure a conviction
It's a bond hearing rather than a trial. This is a Texas court which I'm not very familiar with. generally multiple defendants can be tried at the same time for the exact same crime. It would also make sense if they had the same attorney. The defendants and attorney could move to sever the trials for a bunch of reasons, but again this was a bond hearing, there was no jury, and if they were going to be tried on the same day it would help with scheduling.
While you have 3 different Court systems there one operating under a different Legal System (Scotland), I'm pretty sure you go into one of the Lower Courts when they're doing a list and it'll be like being at a concert. My experience is the Irish criminal courts (only as an intern) but the only difference here was where they were standing, and if you noticed they were cuffed together. England and Wales IIRC allows defendents to appear cuffed, we don't so different strokes for different folks.
Where I live (California), if people commit the same crime together, they are tried together, unless the judge allows them to sever the joint case. But they are always (at a minimum) arraigned together. I don't know about Texas, though. That's the annoying-- I mean "beautiful" part of each state being allowed to write their own laws, we often don't know which state does what.
The last defendant had zero sense of urgency and offered nothing to the judge of substance when he mentioned no knowledge of her background. Didn't mention a job, family, activities, home stability, nothing. Either stupid innocent or co-conspirator. Both are bad.
He specifically stated that obtaining his credentials to practice in Texas would require taking the bar exam there and jumping through hoops. In terms of speculation of drug use- you do realize that there are plenty of practicing lawyers who are (semi)functional drug addicts and/or alcoholics?
Wasn't a very good lawyer or he would have answered I got tired of not being able to challenge the courts lack of jurisdiction over my clients. now that I am not a member of the bar I can argue that.
I am utterly astounded. Rarely, if ever, have I witnessed a judge exhibit such genuine diligence and compassion for ordinary citizens. Observing this judge’s actions leaves me convinced that he is a rare asset to the judiciary and must be safeguarded at all costs. Were someone of his caliber serving on the Supreme Court, Trump would undoubtedly be incarcerated, and Kamala Harris might very well occupy the presidency. The integrity and fairness exemplified by judges like him are indispensable to the restoration of public trust in our judicial system.
Hahaha, this judge is Awesome. You're delusional if you thought Harris was gonna be president. She is worthless, race and sex are no reason to vote for someone. I'm not a huge fan of Trump either but you clearly have your head in the sand if you don't see the powder keg the world is right now. She was running a popularity contest not for president not to help our country. Canada and Mexico are not that far if you don't like to get out.
The judge would have seen through all the b.s. from fani willis / alvin bragg / jack smith... trump was aquit3d by the largest jury trial in the history of the world.. amd he was found not guilty / 47th president
12:00 I was sure he's talking about the cup size. "I have ton of money here and there, Steven's got s lot money. Gates can't buy. Bezos can't. You have it and we can't buy it. You know what it is? No... H." XD
Number 2 - You got Age.. FFS Judge, stop buying Jazzy suits and Bow Ties, take that money in a suitcase down to the best Opticians money can buy and get your eyes sorted out. She looks like she could be his Mom. You can have a car that's a year old, but if it's been razzed around with no mechanical sympathy and has 80,000 on the clock and never had an oil change, it's still gunna be fk'd.
@@IngerThomaswhen I worked in a psychiatric ward one of our patients was a lawyer who was out on bail for defrauding his clients (one of whom was one of our staff) he ended up doing jail time for fraud and being barred from ever being a lawyer again
16:40 what a nutter. For it to be identity fraud on a DEBIT card for minimal 60K she'd have had to have 60K in her own account for someone to steal it. Plus she'd have to have incredible credit scores and substantial assets of her own person for someone to benefit from stealing her identity by opening huge lines of credit. Didn't happen.
First, my brother in christ. Two lawyers and a judge heard her defense and if the charges were really for Debit and not Credit they would have called her ass out on camera. Certainly her own lawyer wouldn't have used that as a defense if that were true. Second you only need a 670 to get 60k in credit not real that hard to accomplish. I'm up to my ears in medical and student loan debt and I still got a 750. You don't know any more if she is telling the truth than the lawyers and judge listening to her. Just gotta wait for the evidence.
What crock. If she is innocent and a victim of identity theft, the judge telling her she must prove her innocence is ridiculous. The Harris County DA needs to do some work. This person will rot in jail, lose her job, cost money and devastate her life. The good judge telling her to prove your innocence is stupid. My God, this woke judge sets other people free who have blatantly broke the law and plays helpless with this one.
That's what op is saying, however with forgeries and impersonation suddenly it's probable enough, then the burden shifts to the actual victim. Simply denying the fact and asking to prove it was actually you doing things is not enough, and that's ridiculous. Banks and courts love to assume they did due diligence and force victim prove it wasn't them rather then taking a burden to prove correct identity of the offender. I mean they have some proof, e.g. they checked i.d. document but asking whether it was forged or not, suddenly becomes unreasonable.
@@OmateYayami If she is telling the truth, The Good Woke Judge here should have required someone in that office to contact her attorney to find out all the details of her legal issues there at the very least.
He is about right. I would also say "money" is what the ruling class use to control the peasants/slave class. With money they can coninuosly tax us & taxation is also a modern-day slavery tool. Literaly we cannot live without money. We depend on it for everything. We are the only species on earth paying "rent" to live on earth.
My ex-husband opened a cell phone account in my name in California, while I lived and worked in Missouri. I had to jump thru flaming hoops to get them to drop their attempt to collect. It was infuriating to have to prove that it wasn't me, when they didn't do their due diligence in opening the account. It happens.
And not like we can hold the company liable either
If what that woman says about her identity theft case is true, wow! I feel so bad for her.
I understand that the system has to take precautions, and sometime it sucks, but there is absolutely no reason we should be accepting the idea that innocent people just have to sit in jail for 15 days before being dragged off to another state and they get no recompense and nobody has to pay for that.
Somebody has to pay, like a thousand dollars a day minimum.
If it's a cop that screwed up, the cop pays.
If it's a DA, the DA pays.
A judge, the judge pays.
A criminal, the criminal pays, and hell yes if they have no assets make em work it off in prison!
@@trygveskogsholm5963 reality is when those you listed screw up, they don't pay but YOU do and by millions. So many 1st amendment auditors are getting arrested just because cops have egos.... Prosecutors also are corrupt and charge you with whatever the cop says and not watch a single body cam and not realease it.
@@trygveskogsholm5963 Go give Ya head a Shake .
@@trygveskogsholm5963 the taxpayer pays in all of those cases
My Uncle Bob is a retired cop. He told my daughter the same thing as the judge. Men are dogs. Lol. Her Dad wasn't a dog, however! Sadly, he passed away. I hope she finds a man as wonderful as my husband was.
The last case I believe the judge should have set her Free!
He should have definitely talked to her a little more. She indicated she already had a lawyer in Tennessee after stating earlier she had never been there. It's possible but he should have definitely questioned her a little more to try and determine the truth
2nd case -Great advice from Judge F ! 22yrs? 😅 Thought she was 52yrs!
Another case where he is unwilling to look at exculpatory video.
I watched another case before this judge where a man was accursed of something that could be disproved by viewing video, but the judge declined to view the video, that man had a very good lawyer who continued; to insist that the judge look at the video that the prosecutor had on a laptop in court at that time. When he finally looked at the video, he found no probable cause because the video clearly showed the charges were false.
Here he declines to look at video that another judge said existed and kept a woman falsely incarcerated. If video is available that shows she is not the person sought and that could free her, he is a part of the problem if he won't view it.
12:39 He fully explains the situation and how to resolve her issue of having an outstanding bond. He also states he has no access to any video should it exist that would be a matter for later down the line. So I find your comment in this instance on the unfair side. He even offers to look at the situation again should she present further proof when many would just stamp the form and say next.
@@ryansta She doesn't have the video that another judge is aware of and may have seen. This is not about guilt or innocence, it's about identify. An Arizona woman spent time in jail for a warrant issued for a woman in another state that she does not resemble and is 20+ years her junior because they wouldn't look at her ID information.
@@ryansta It was a probable cause hearing, dumba$$! You are defending the indefencible.
A teacher in our district was killed by a drunk driver at 3 pm as she was leaving work to go to church. She was the sweetest, kindest person.
There is no excuse when ride share services are available.
This is not the court for that. And the ADA should’ve reviewed that evidence before deciding wether or not there was enough evidentiary circumstances to secure a conviction
Any updates about the woman who’s identity was stolen?
If the judge is real, He is A GOOD MAN. Hard,Isay,Hard to find. I'm Blue, I'd vote for him. Thanks sir. Thanks.
What do you mean, if he’s real? You think they just let anybody behind the bench?
How do two defendants appear before a judge at the same time? Not allowed in the UK! Can anyone enlighten me please?
It's a bond hearing rather than a trial. This is a Texas court which I'm not very familiar with. generally multiple defendants can be tried at the same time for the exact same crime. It would also make sense if they had the same attorney.
The defendants and attorney could move to sever the trials for a bunch of reasons, but again this was a bond hearing, there was no jury, and if they were going to be tried on the same day it would help with scheduling.
It’s cheaper
It’s about processing more for more money ❤
It isn't everywhere
While you have 3 different Court systems there one operating under a different Legal System (Scotland), I'm pretty sure you go into one of the Lower Courts when they're doing a list and it'll be like being at a concert. My experience is the Irish criminal courts (only as an intern) but the only difference here was where they were standing, and if you noticed they were cuffed together. England and Wales IIRC allows defendents to appear cuffed, we don't so different strokes for different folks.
Where I live (California), if people commit the same crime together, they are tried together, unless the judge allows them to sever the joint case. But they are always (at a minimum) arraigned together. I don't know about Texas, though. That's the annoying-- I mean "beautiful" part of each state being allowed to write their own laws, we often don't know which state does what.
The last defendant had zero sense of urgency and offered nothing to the judge of substance when he mentioned no knowledge of her background. Didn't mention a job, family, activities, home stability, nothing. Either stupid innocent or co-conspirator. Both are bad.
Hungry person on a street is a public danger. Gotta love this logic lol.
Commenting on lawyer guy, i am willing that drugs are involved and why he isnt a lawyer anymore.
..too many hoops to jump through to get Bar admittance in that state.
He specifically stated that obtaining his credentials to practice in Texas would require taking the bar exam there and jumping through hoops.
In terms of speculation of drug use- you do realize that there are plenty of practicing lawyers who are (semi)functional drug addicts and/or alcoholics?
Wasn't a very good lawyer or he would have answered I got tired of not being able to challenge the courts lack of jurisdiction over my clients. now that I am not a member of the bar I can argue that.
I am utterly astounded. Rarely, if ever, have I witnessed a judge exhibit such genuine diligence and compassion for ordinary citizens. Observing this judge’s actions leaves me convinced that he is a rare asset to the judiciary and must be safeguarded at all costs. Were someone of his caliber serving on the Supreme Court, Trump would undoubtedly be incarcerated, and Kamala Harris might very well occupy the presidency. The integrity and fairness exemplified by judges like him are indispensable to the restoration of public trust in our judicial system.
This guy is really good dude, he mostly does probable cause so lets a lot of people off caught by police doing sketchy stops
He would be smart enough to know like the majority of people in this country that Trump didn't do anything to be incarcerated for.
The reason u see him smiling is because he makes RUclips videos..😂😂😂😂😂..nothing fancy
Hahaha, this judge is Awesome.
You're delusional if you thought Harris was gonna be president. She is worthless, race and sex are no reason to vote for someone. I'm not a huge fan of Trump either but you clearly have your head in the sand if you don't see the powder keg the world is right now. She was running a popularity contest not for president not to help our country. Canada and Mexico are not that far if you don't like to get out.
The judge would have seen through all the b.s. from fani willis / alvin bragg / jack smith... trump was aquit3d by the largest jury trial in the history of the world.. amd he was found not guilty / 47th president
Why not compare her fingerprints from Tennessee
Did TN ever have their suspect in custody to get prints?
12:00 I was sure he's talking about the cup size.
"I have ton of money here and there, Steven's got s lot money. Gates can't buy. Bezos can't. You have it and we can't buy it. You know what it is? No... H." XD
Last case with the title of this video - what happened?
Number 2 - You got Age.. FFS Judge, stop buying Jazzy suits and Bow Ties, take that money in a suitcase down to the best Opticians money can buy and get your eyes sorted out. She looks like she could be his Mom. You can have a car that's a year old, but if it's been razzed around with no mechanical sympathy and has 80,000 on the clock and never had an oil change, it's still gunna be fk'd.
From lawyer in Chicago to homeless in Houston? 🤔 I'd be checking for warrants in Illinois!
Idk how police, Lawyers or whoever start on one side of the law and end up on the other side of the law. Usually it all goes south. SMH.
@@IngerThomaswhen I worked in a psychiatric ward one of our patients was a lawyer who was out on bail for defrauding his clients (one of whom was one of our staff) he ended up doing jail time for fraud and being barred from ever being a lawyer again
Sounds like he has a drug problem that he is trying to hide
did he just say knowledge with an unsilenced K, K- nowledge wow
16:40 what a nutter. For it to be identity fraud on a DEBIT card for minimal 60K she'd have had to have 60K in her own account for someone to steal it. Plus she'd have to have incredible credit scores and substantial assets of her own person for someone to benefit from stealing her identity by opening huge lines of credit. Didn't happen.
First, my brother in christ. Two lawyers and a judge heard her defense and if the charges were really for Debit and not Credit they would have called her ass out on camera. Certainly her own lawyer wouldn't have used that as a defense if that were true. Second you only need a 670 to get 60k in credit not real that hard to accomplish. I'm up to my ears in medical and student loan debt and I still got a 750. You don't know any more if she is telling the truth than the lawyers and judge listening to her. Just gotta wait for the evidence.
What crock. If she is innocent and a victim of identity theft, the judge telling her she must prove her innocence is ridiculous. The Harris County DA needs to do some work. This person will rot in jail, lose her job, cost money and devastate her life. The good judge telling her to prove your innocence is stupid. My God, this woke judge sets other people free who have blatantly broke the law and plays helpless with this one.
The burden of proof is usually on the accuser ,not the defendent
That's what op is saying, however with forgeries and impersonation suddenly it's probable enough, then the burden shifts to the actual victim. Simply denying the fact and asking to prove it was actually you doing things is not enough, and that's ridiculous.
Banks and courts love to assume they did due diligence and force victim prove it wasn't them rather then taking a burden to prove correct identity of the offender.
I mean they have some proof, e.g. they checked i.d. document but asking whether it was forged or not, suddenly becomes unreasonable.
@@OmateYayami If she is telling the truth, The Good Woke Judge here should have required someone in that office to contact her attorney to find out all the details of her legal issues there at the very least.
I have watched this judge let people walk away free guilty of crimes they committed. But acts helpless in this situation.
This judge is as cool as the other side of the pillow.
using robot voice for narration is the real crime here. channel added to the block list
This judge is a activist judge!!!!
Right on!!!
I don’t agree with the Judge always saying MONEY is g be supreme thing in life! It’s not
He is about right. I would also say "money" is what the ruling class use to control the peasants/slave class. With money they can coninuosly tax us & taxation is also a modern-day slavery tool. Literaly we cannot live without money. We depend on it for everything. We are the only species on earth paying "rent" to live on earth.
What tf am I seeing at 21:25? lol
'Here's a bag of candy: get your little butt back to my chambers, lad.' lol
Yeah not sure I believe her