Comparison of single and twin guns - China, USA, Russia

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 17 янв 2025

Комментарии • 2,5 тыс.

  • @testpilotmafia862
    @testpilotmafia862 Год назад +718

    US: aim, shoot, correct, shoot...
    RU: aim, shoot, correct, shoot...
    CN: shoot...shoot...shoot...shoot... shoot -- more were not hitting anything !

    • @مسلمغانم-ش5ث
      @مسلمغانم-ش5ث Год назад +13

      😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @johnmaximusconstantine2743
      @johnmaximusconstantine2743 Год назад +13

      Hey, no one said anything about aiming! Just deliver what it was requested.
      what are cannons made for? Aiming or shooting?
      china: Work smarter, not harder XD

    • @testpilotmafia862
      @testpilotmafia862 Год назад

      @@johnmaximusconstantine2743 China: We can mine more lead.

    • @taca100
      @taca100 Год назад +3

      Intimidation

    • @peytonsapp8766
      @peytonsapp8766 Год назад

      Communists that have slaves

  • @mee6923
    @mee6923 Год назад +1822

    Первое: Лёгкая артиллерия.
    Второе: Выстрел из основного калибра.
    Третье: Зенитная пушка.
    Иными словами, сравнили три абсолютно разные вещи

    • @oreshek_grecky
      @oreshek_grecky Год назад +47

      На втором, далеко, не основной калибр

    • @АлмазАлшынбаев
      @АлмазАлшынбаев Год назад +4

      ​@@oreshek_grecky один из основных калибров стоящих на вооружении

    • @urapopov8642
      @urapopov8642 Год назад +67

      ​@@АлмазАлшынбаев если ты думаешь что 127 мм орудие это лекгая артилерия а 130 уже основной калибр то это уже клиника

    • @RyanPuller
      @RyanPuller Год назад +8

      The American one is our main gun. We mostly use long range missiles submarines or aircraft for our offense.

    • @zlolz500
      @zlolz500 Год назад +5

      ​@@urapopov8642я тоже не помню чтоб на наших кораблях стояли пушки как на линкорах. Там же в основном ракетное вооружение стоит. А у амеров есть линкоры с большими калибрами.

  • @TheMjalltheway
    @TheMjalltheway Год назад +901

    The Chinese gun really said "fuck it they out there somewhere"

    • @choelewis5484
      @choelewis5484 Год назад +9

      😂😂😂exactly what i was thinking

    • @michaelversant8401
      @michaelversant8401 Год назад +4

      lol :)

    • @GenaroMarte
      @GenaroMarte Год назад +2

      😂😂😂😂😂

    • @timespace2879
      @timespace2879 Год назад +3

      😂😂 is the chinese one a military exercise of ? Like a drone test or something

    • @J3uTaMuH
      @J3uTaMuH Год назад +3

      Зато у него блютуз есть 😅 и ТВ каналы ловит.

  • @jimmyjohnjames6397
    @jimmyjohnjames6397 Год назад +937

    China's gun: When you order your targeting system from WISH.😂

    • @diRtyMuddman
      @diRtyMuddman Год назад +2

      Fucking had me with that one 😂😂😂😂

    • @ritjardsoto9124
      @ritjardsoto9124 Год назад +3

      I mean, they got anti ship and anti air in the same piece.

    • @Obtite
      @Obtite Год назад +1

      ​@@ritjardsoto9124there is no anti ship guns nowdays. Ships are just anti piracy . Ship to ship combat gets done with missiles

    • @AceAndrew00
      @AceAndrew00 Год назад +2

      Hmmm… almost like it was made in China… 😅🫵🏼

    • @christianporter3638
      @christianporter3638 Год назад +4

      Exactly! “Made in China” gives me zero confidence that it will last for any significantly meaningful amount of time. I’ve got myriad of examples in my home to prove that point

  • @donosprey8754
    @donosprey8754 Год назад +223

    I would be surprised but you compared three different types of weapon. The US 127 is an actual main battery whilst the Chinese one looks to be a light cannon or AA gun.

    • @sergeantblue6115
      @sergeantblue6115 Год назад +4

      2 actually, the ak130 and the mark45mod4 are of the same category of guns, the hpj26 is more comparable to the likes of auto melera, I feel like either the Chinese 100mm or the 130mm would be more comparable to the other two

    • @SalutPOTO
      @SalutPOTO Год назад +1

      ​@@sergeantblue6115 😵‍💫🤕

    • @Chironex_Fleckeri
      @Chironex_Fleckeri Год назад +4

      ​@@SalutPOTOBasically this video leads people to draw conclusions that aren't accurate. The Chinese gun is probably for a frigate or their doctrine requires them to get much closer or to only engage smaller surface threats. If the 76mm is in gun range of a DDG torpedoes or some sea skimming air breathing threat is on the way.
      Different mission sets is my guess. China's requirements are different. I'm sure it could be used against an island, but sailing an expensive warship within ATGM and Javelin range seems crazy. You don't need to sink a ship to render it useless to a mission. My guess is China wants to use this as a dual purpose

    • @YourBonesInMyDresser
      @YourBonesInMyDresser Год назад

      ​@@Chironex_Fleckeri the video isn't leading anyone to anything other than to laugh at the hilarity of how they're firing it. 😂

  • @makubex00
    @makubex00 Год назад +713

    The chinese turret operator must be having the time of his life. Not sure what the engineers would say though.

    • @allent2ify
      @allent2ify Год назад +31

      He doesnt know how to aim so hes trying the accuracy by volume trick.

    • @testpilotmafia862
      @testpilotmafia862 Год назад +7

      Or he's of his seizure meds.

    • @johnmaximusconstantine2743
      @johnmaximusconstantine2743 Год назад +10

      Engineer: with this joystick you can aim and fire the weap...
      gunner: yeeehaaawww!
      engineer: wait, what are yoy doing? Lemmon man, stop... Stahp!

    • @mark-ish
      @mark-ish Год назад +6

      Chinese are shooting a cloud of mosquitoes.

    • @hectoralejandro9883
      @hectoralejandro9883 Год назад

      They’re still trying to translate the maintenance manual into Chinese so they can complete the theft.

  • @N75911_
    @N75911_ Год назад +557

    US Gun: Firing at target
    RU Gun: Firing at target
    CN Gun: GOOFY AHHH NAVAL ARTILLERY.

    • @dauphongii
      @dauphongii Год назад +4

      It's also firing at target. Starting from highest to the lowest height so all shots land at the same time like mortar

    • @Manoshiv3002
      @Manoshiv3002 Год назад

      ​@@dauphongii😂😂 i think u r brain is also made in Cheena.... 😂

    • @Azaqa
      @Azaqa Год назад +12

      ​@@dauphongii incorrect. Its an anti air gun, not sure why its even in the video. Also thats not at all how mortars work?

    • @dauphongii
      @dauphongii Год назад +2

      @@Azaqa mortars can shoot a projectile which explodes in the air and then spreads out, exploding on multiple places at once. This is similar to what the mortar is doing

    • @Azaqa
      @Azaqa Год назад +7

      @@dauphongii thats called airburst and is not at all what the chinese gun is doing...

  • @megbegbmeg8529
    @megbegbmeg8529 Год назад +2291

    У китайской сломался датчик наводки и контроля стрельбы)

    • @KastMasterrr
      @KastMasterrr Год назад +62

      Это зенитное орудие, с фугасными снарядами, обладающими радио-взрывателем.

    • @kirillorlov3676
      @kirillorlov3676 Год назад +56

      @@KastMasterrrкнопка атаки залипла

    • @KastMasterrr
      @KastMasterrr Год назад +3

      @@kirillorlov3676 Врятли.

    • @franciscruz2012
      @franciscruz2012 Год назад +11

      Concuerdo con el desconocido

    • @hellhound908
      @hellhound908 Год назад +2

      А не ускирина ли съёмка ?

  • @j-davis7290
    @j-davis7290 Год назад +227

    I love how it just casually shits out the spent casing a second later

    • @adanm603
      @adanm603 Год назад +4

      If you look closely above the barrel, a small hatch opens to eject the spent shell!

  • @drewkallhoff7213
    @drewkallhoff7213 Год назад +382

    when you are experienced at war, you don't need to fire a crap load of rounds to hit a target lol

    • @zendraw3468
      @zendraw3468 Год назад +16

      did you read that in the manual?

    • @RJ-ol3xk
      @RJ-ol3xk Год назад +27

      ​@@zendraw3468 No, just the fact that US Naval gunfire is the most used and experienced battery in real world conflict out of the three.

    • @zendraw3468
      @zendraw3468 Год назад +24

      @@RJ-ol3xk what real world conflict exactly... becouse i havent heard about naval fights happening in last 50 years...

    • @RJ-ol3xk
      @RJ-ol3xk Год назад +13

      @@zendraw3468 Naval gunfire gets used in supporting ship to shore engagements. The USN has can and does fire that deck gun on over the horizon arcs in support of on land operations throughout continued hostilities in North Africa and the Middle east. It's not the primary armament for ship to ship engagements.

    • @floreshaxhukellari8164
      @floreshaxhukellari8164 Год назад

      I love it

  • @butter6519
    @butter6519 Год назад +195

    The China gunner dropped his controller

    • @frobro2250
      @frobro2250 Год назад +4

      😂😂

    • @maximepires2603
      @maximepires2603 Год назад +4

      nah, it just malfunctioned (it happens all the time)

    • @icedancer2370
      @icedancer2370 Год назад

      This is the best comment

    • @vipeerx
      @vipeerx Год назад

      😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂ору

  • @wasertog2742
    @wasertog2742 Год назад +1227

    США: Лови точный выстрел демократии
    Россия: Лови дуплетом
    Китай: И тут я начинаю шмалять!

  • @ThomasistheTwin
    @ThomasistheTwin Год назад +137

    When you make your guns at the windshield wiper factory.

    • @ash56919
      @ash56919 Год назад +3

      Can’t stop laughing

    • @Scandalous0001
      @Scandalous0001 Год назад +1

      😂😂😂😂

    • @thunderedsun203
      @thunderedsun203 Год назад +1

      civilian factory converted to military factory

    • @ThomasistheTwin
      @ThomasistheTwin Год назад +2

      @@thunderedsun203 You sure we can make that? Sure we can, without delay.

    • @redneck4741
      @redneck4741 Год назад

      This comment made me choke from laughing 🤣🤣

  • @diRtyMuddman
    @diRtyMuddman Год назад +62

    China: We shoot so fast and at ease. America: our bullets are twice the size and don't miss. 😂😂😂

    • @DanielOrdaz-k4y
      @DanielOrdaz-k4y Год назад +3

      Cómo los misiles que usaron para tirar un mísero globo? Y fallaron todavía jajaja se gastaron millones de dólares para tirar un globo .
      En cambio Rusia les tiró un dron espía con estilo y sin batallar 🤭🤷🏻‍♂️

    • @MrBombs-ez4vx
      @MrBombs-ez4vx Год назад +1

      @@DanielOrdaz-k4y Are you talking about the Chinese balloon from earlier in the year? If so there was no missing and that balloon was brought down.

    • @ベストテン動画
      @ベストテン動画 Год назад

      中国的拍摄距离较远 这个口径和美国的一样 都是舰载火炮

  • @Unregistered.Hypercam.2.
    @Unregistered.Hypercam.2. Год назад +18

    Usa: accurate fire
    Russia: accurate fire
    China: what the FUCK is accurate fire

  • @thespartanamongus1121
    @thespartanamongus1121 Год назад +244

    Waiting for the comparison of 800mm Gustav and 20mm Oerlikon

    • @barneytheovergrownpetsnail4437
      @barneytheovergrownpetsnail4437 Год назад +3

      literally, like you can’t compare those they’re all totally different 😭😭😭

    • @earlcatolin5702
      @earlcatolin5702 Год назад +1

      Those are autocannons right?

    • @redmask1356
      @redmask1356 Год назад +10

      @@barneytheovergrownpetsnail4437 thats the point

    • @jonslg240
      @jonslg240 Год назад +1

      That last one looks like it's been sped up about 1.5x lol

    • @BANAnCHEK1
      @BANAnCHEK1 Год назад

      Глянь на русский корабельный ака, прикольная штука, один раз в живую видел как стреляет, мурашки по коже

  • @reynztv3635
    @reynztv3635 Год назад +420

    I think that chinese gun is malfunctioning 😳

    • @hellisia-celeste-evangelin8925
      @hellisia-celeste-evangelin8925 Год назад +32

      No no american boom russian boom boom china bingchilling ratatatata 😂😂

    • @Terence911
      @Terence911 Год назад +13

      No,its a Anti Air sistem of 70mm a much lighter caliber that can be fired rapidly,the american one is 131mm a much hevier caliber

    • @baransamy9698
      @baransamy9698 Год назад +7

      Its not malfunctioning each shell Is fired on a different arc, the first is the highest angle and consecutive shots on a more direct approach. This is done so all shells fired of a volley can land near simultaneously for added affect. Or maybe it is. I wasn't there.

    • @paulsd9255
      @paulsd9255 Год назад +9

      @@baransamy9698 different arcs for maximum civilian damage

    • @novanoir8309
      @novanoir8309 Год назад

      It went berserk 😅

  • @Maga-s5k6l
    @Maga-s5k6l Год назад +231

    Где-то на китайском заводе.
    -И так вы сделали карабельную артиллерию?
    -Вы хотели сказать пулемёт?
    -Нет, артиллерия.
    -Аааа ааа.... Ну тогда тут проблемка.

  • @heathhalfhill6401
    @heathhalfhill6401 Год назад +62

    1st one hitting the target with a large caliber round, 2nd hitting target with a large caliber round, and the 3rd shooting indiscriminately at nothing with a smaller caliber round.

    • @angrydragonslayer
      @angrydragonslayer Год назад +3

      just a matter of attitude
      he's shooting indiscriminately at EVERYTHING

    • @sergiodario58able
      @sergiodario58able Год назад +2

      I think it's called "zone saturation" in contrast to incoming missiles and using "Proximity Spoletts" where the ammunition fragments in proximity of its incoming target.

    • @WENLONGTU
      @WENLONGTU Год назад

      这是中国055舰炮陆基极限射速测试。055上的1130近防炮也拥有同样卓越的性能。期待055b全电推进版本。

  • @tysonhughes3711
    @tysonhughes3711 Год назад +20

    It is never about fire power or speed, it is all about accuracy
    Sun Tzu - the art of war

  • @demonloot6712
    @demonloot6712 Год назад +18

    Chinese government: so do these bullets work? No, but if you shoot many of them we might hit something.

  • @SergeantDandy1776
    @SergeantDandy1776 Год назад +218

    Every 12 year old finding out there’s an underbarrel grenade launcher in COD 4: Modern Warfare

  • @雑用係-t6y
    @雑用係-t6y Год назад +150

    使用用途が違うからだろ、対空兵装なら威力なんて無視して連射させたほうが強い。

    • @Kalashnikov..
      @Kalashnikov.. Год назад +1

      Тут у вашего орудия вышел датчик контроля и наводки.

    • @Bustin_cider00
      @Bustin_cider00 Год назад +1

      76mm seems VERY anemic for an Anti-Aircraft gun

    • @ライフル君
      @ライフル君 Год назад

      威力が高いって事は飛距離がその分伸びて、早い段階から迎撃出来る。連射して当らんかったら馬鹿馬鹿しい。それに連射速度遅かったら物量でカバーできるやろ

    • @雑用係-t6y
      @雑用係-t6y Год назад

      @@ライフル君
      弾幕張る前提なら尚更必要だろ、着発信管なら数が必要。

    • @jg3517
      @jg3517 Год назад +1

      彼等は対UFO用対空砲を作ったんだよ。
      通常の対空兵装では相手にならないだろうから。

  • @Vladislav_Rusov
    @Vladislav_Rusov Год назад +14

    Китайцы свои традиции не оставляют. У них и арбалет был безумный, и пушка туда же.😁👍

  • @peterhuffam1006
    @peterhuffam1006 Год назад +2

    If you actually AIM and hit the target the first time, you save time and ammo. The ammo available for the American version of the Otto/Melara 127mm gun is pretty scary stuff. The early versions of the programmable fuse were impressive enough, but now there’s projectiles with terminal optical guidance, the imagery for which is uploaded to the memory of the projectile fuse as it is leaving the barrel of the gun, at 3200 fps. It doesn’t miss.

  • @pfffffff510
    @pfffffff510 Год назад +213

    У китайца лапша опрокинулась на приборы🤣

    • @Muhhammad-05
      @Muhhammad-05 Год назад

      😂😂

    • @АнтонСтепанов-т2ц
      @АнтонСтепанов-т2ц Год назад

      Скорее на коленки))))

    • @DarkCook1es
      @DarkCook1es Год назад

      люблю, как весь раздел commets - просто рост на фарфоровом пистолете

    • @ih_m1
      @ih_m1 Год назад

      😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @dimasivan2005
      @dimasivan2005 Год назад

      🇨🇳🇨🇳🤜🇷🇺

  • @CindyLooper-r6w
    @CindyLooper-r6w Год назад +72

    USA actually hits it's Target

  • @SUKHOI-57
    @SUKHOI-57 Год назад +88

    H/PJ26함포 시험영상이네요...
    76.2mm이고 사실상 대공포

    • @BeJlblu_gem0H
      @BeJlblu_gem0H Год назад +1

      Ты типо китаец? 我也是

    • @noticedruid4985
      @noticedruid4985 Год назад

      ​@@BeJlblu_gem0H это корейский

    • @BeJlblu_gem0H
      @BeJlblu_gem0H Год назад +1

      @@noticedruid4985 нет это китайская письменость

    • @noticedruid4985
      @noticedruid4985 Год назад +2

      @@BeJlblu_gem0H Вы можете сказать, что это корейский язык по кружкам в символах. Китайские иероглифы не используют круги. Вот пример на китайском и корейском языках.
      привет на китайском это 你好
      привет на корейском это 안녕하세요

    • @CriscCiaddu
      @CriscCiaddu Год назад +1

      Chinese Oto-Melara?

  • @jerryheo5756
    @jerryheo5756 Год назад

    3인치.함포의 발사속도는 역시 대공포로 쓰였던 포 이기도 하지 예전에 mk45 5인치 함포의 기능중 하나가 사거리 연장탄 발사가 가능하다는 건대 그 포탄은 미국에서 비용 문제로 개발이 폐기됬죠

  • @lancehayes9983
    @lancehayes9983 Год назад +4

    Russia makes sure you know exactly where they're at and china looks like a 12 year old playing call of duty.

  • @噛み噛み
    @噛み噛み Год назад +224

    中国さん、落ち着けw

  • @audreyross7540
    @audreyross7540 Год назад +45

    When you're drunk with the boys and decided to play warships

    • @Odin-dvajdi
      @Odin-dvajdi Год назад

      Главное не скорострельность а точность

  • @zabidulka
    @zabidulka Год назад +20

    3 - наводчик контужен ,разброс увеличен 😅

  • @yjbae2080
    @yjbae2080 Год назад +11

    첫 장면.. 탄피 바다로 빠지면 어쩌나 ㅎㄷㄷ 수거본능 발동

    • @WarmPillow-hs6kj
      @WarmPillow-hs6kj Год назад +2

      Very much true my friend, but take it into account that they’re in combat and littering is all the sudden an occurrence instead of a problem in war.

    • @ReaIJackhammer
      @ReaIJackhammer Год назад

      Imagine if they hit what they are aiming for 😮😮😮. All of a sudden a lot is going into rhe sea.

    • @ud35607
      @ud35607 Год назад

      울나라 해군 기준 총 발사한 포탄 중 10퍼였나? 그정돈 잃어버려도 상관없음
      바다 기상때문에 잃어버리는게 당연한수준이라
      물론 잃어버렸다고 무슨 서류는 써야하긴 하는데 별 중요하진 않은거 같음

    • @cdcd33cdcd7
      @cdcd33cdcd7 Год назад

      ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

    • @I_Hate_HandIe
      @I_Hate_HandIe Год назад

      울타리있음

  • @reform-revolution
    @reform-revolution Год назад +3

    am I the only one that giggles whenever a shell just poops out of an autolaoding turret?

    • @jetstreak2786
      @jetstreak2786 Год назад

      No, apparently half of the viewers of this video are fascinated by the dwarven magic of autoloaders.

    • @reform-revolution
      @reform-revolution Год назад

      @@jetstreak2786 the dwarves would make autoloaders the crafty b*stards

  • @thunderhawk7264
    @thunderhawk7264 Год назад +25

    This brings a new meaning to made in china

  • @나는나-c5t
    @나는나-c5t Год назад +22

    단발 쌍발 중요한게 아니곶ㅡ 표적 타격 정확성이다

  • @TheyCallMeArchy
    @TheyCallMeArchy Год назад +9

    Imagine you’re in battle and all if a sudden you hear abba.

    • @tintindb
      @tintindb Год назад +1

      "Don't go wasting ammunition 🎶.."

  • @СергейСизов-ю5и
    @СергейСизов-ю5и 10 месяцев назад +1

    А ещё больше можно ускорить китайца?
    А то,как то не очень быстро получается😢

  • @fksplittistbarin7167
    @fksplittistbarin7167 Год назад +1

    科普一下,片中中国的舰炮射击画面是上个世纪八十年代一款中国舰炮在进行测试的画面,当时的场景是进行极速射击,就算测试在短时间对不同目标进行射击,因为有空中目标和地面目标,所以射击角度也不一样。这款舰炮后来装备在054护卫舰上。

  • @TheGreenNewSteal2025
    @TheGreenNewSteal2025 Год назад +17

    When the gunner has a twelve-vodka lunch.

  • @john05173
    @john05173 Год назад +6

    Вы бы еще с пулемётом сравнили. На русских кораблях 130 мм стоит, у США немного меньше, а Китай 76 мм.

  • @ovzy0
    @ovzy0 Год назад +43

    the operator pressed the button while screaming HAHAHAHAHOOAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  • @wortilus7643
    @wortilus7643 Год назад

    Wow, that's great. Now, what's the accuracy of the systems at 1000 yards on a target moving 50 knots in rough sea conditions.

  • @kevinmaxwell6610
    @kevinmaxwell6610 Год назад +1

    I've always heard that once a barrel gets hot accuracy declines,so that's the idea of multi barrels.

  • @floridaman3892
    @floridaman3892 Год назад +10

    Not only are the guns completely different calibers, the US one I know for sure is optimized for long range missile stuff and things, and I’d guess that means it would have less advanced guns. Also the first comment I saw explained it perfectly

    • @Dakshc-g7k
      @Dakshc-g7k Год назад +1

      Russian 130caliber usa 120calibers and china about 70calibers

  • @Momoco1212
    @Momoco1212 Год назад +18

    2003 년 중국은 76-mm 해군 함포를 테스트
    76mm canon testing in the year of 2003.

  • @thecommunityspace
    @thecommunityspace 11 месяцев назад

    Saturation strikes with proximity detonation is the most effective against any air attack within range. Barrel may need to be replaced afterwards but thats why you always carry spares. Hater gonna hate 🤷🏾‍♂️

  • @darkone739
    @darkone739 Год назад +1

    USA-accuracy and precision
    Russia-Let’s just eyeball it and send it
    China-Fuck I dropped my controller

  • @HosoKT
    @HosoKT Год назад +19

    艦砲も焼尽薬莢にしないと、甲板がへこみだらけになってしまう。

    • @Vincent98987
      @Vincent98987 Год назад +4

      Deck is a strong material not plastic

    • @GrundleLongDong
      @GrundleLongDong Год назад

      @@Vincent98987 no, shhhh
      They haven’t found out how to build stronger decks yet, don’t give them any hints

  • @gg0415_
    @gg0415_ Год назад +4

    MK45って撃ったあと中に人がいて薬莢を捨てているみたいなかんじで出てくるの良いよね

  • @전덕근-g2j
    @전덕근-g2j Год назад +35

    차이나는차이나네ㅋㅋㅋ옆에있던라오닝 격침!

  • @Synthmilk
    @Synthmilk Год назад

    There is an important change in shooting philosophy happening in some Western militaries, which prioritizes range + accuracy over rate of fire or size of the shell. If you can hit the target the first time before the target can hit you, then not only does this result in a faster victory, but dramatically reduces the cost and risk of getting that victory. It also means you can immediately engage the next target if you know the first shot is going to hit and you won't need a follow up shot, which means you can engage many more targets effectively. Self Guided Ammunition is starting to make it's way to all US cannons, from 155mm Howitzers, to these 127mm Naval guns, down to 35mm autocannons, and even 12.7mm (.50 Cal) rounds.
    Volume of fire will soon be obsolete as an effective engagement strategy.

  • @pilipino_ph8640
    @pilipino_ph8640 Год назад +1

    Us:*fire**reload**fire**reload*
    Russia:"forget to reload just fire"
    China:BUMBUMBUMBUMBUM

  • @테드-h6q
    @테드-h6q Год назад +6

    차이나~ 저거 진짜 무서운거임 포탄이 어디로 떨어질지 모르니까^^

  • @kairatbereshov4433
    @kairatbereshov4433 Год назад +9

    Главное не количество выстрела вожна, а качество мощность и точность выстрела вожна, вот в чём надо сравнивать .

  • @Praktical_
    @Praktical_ Год назад +8

    Lmao I think the dude at the controls of that chinese gun is having a seizure 😂

  • @clementfortin4315
    @clementfortin4315 Год назад

    What is the name of the last gun ive seen this video a long time ago and was never able to find it again.

  • @igorovcharov7424
    @igorovcharov7424 Год назад

    китаец лупит так, чтобы в китае безработицы еще лет сто не было! Молодец! Переживает за свой народ!

  • @hpk1490
    @hpk1490 Год назад +25

    중국껀 아주 사방 팔방 난사를 하는구나 ㅋㅋ

    • @ВасилийСухорутченко
      @ВасилийСухорутченко Год назад

      Попасть не может

    • @ВасилийСухорутченко
      @ВасилийСухорутченко Год назад

      Посмотри фильм Хантер, под конец интересно

    • @오너리퍼-b3u
      @오너리퍼-b3u Год назад

      허나 저건 하나에 문제가 있는영상일뿐 실제론 다목적 함포입니다
      무려 줌왈트에 탑재될 레일건도 "이론상" 방공이 가능하다는 정보지만 HPJ130은 예비탄만 있다면 130MM를아주 자동발사로 방공질을 할수있는게 기본옵션입니다

  • @ws29leo14
    @ws29leo14 Год назад +7

    지구를 적으로 생각하는 대륙의 기상

    • @ASinov
      @ASinov Год назад

      我们都是这罪恶之地的孩子。 Ха

    • @edamaru00
      @edamaru00 Год назад +1

      🌍🌏🌎vs🇨🇳

  • @antiquesandlearningtolive4369
    @antiquesandlearningtolive4369 Год назад

    Where is the Iowa class battleship 16' double 3x launchers?
    Video maker didn't do homework. As far as ship fired artillery/weaponry, the Iowa class was never matched.
    Search "Iowa class battleship cannon firing".

  • @icommitedthefunny
    @icommitedthefunny Год назад

    i think the last one is a autoloader test where they fire at the sharpest and randomest of angles to see if the autoloader can reload consistently or not

  • @-Russian_Knight
    @-Russian_Knight Год назад +2

    🇺🇲: 💥 💥 💥 💥
    🇷🇺: 💥💥 💥💥 💥💥
    🇨🇳:👉👉👉👉👉👉👉👉👉👉👉👉👉

  • @Sun-wi1zg
    @Sun-wi1zg Год назад +9

    검증도 안된 차이나 클라스. ㅋㅋㅋ

  • @クルニタ
    @クルニタ Год назад +5

    С праздником вас,С днем великой победы, Ура ❤️❤️❤️🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇲🇨 🇲🇨 🇲🇨🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸L

  • @christopherchartier3017
    @christopherchartier3017 Год назад

    Not to dunk on Russia but I never understood why having those double guns were a good option nowadays. Seems like extra maintenance for similar firepower to contemporaries, perhaps with slightly better but negligible. I could be wrong, feel free to correct me

  • @Militaryman64
    @Militaryman64 Год назад

    Big differences between direct fire on target and suppressive fire around area of target.

  • @audionmusic2787
    @audionmusic2787 Год назад +18

    It’s funny to hear Russians talking about Chinese the way we Americans talk about Russians.

    • @vipeerx
      @vipeerx Год назад

      Это называется "недооценивать противника"😂

    • @РатниК-ч1ш
      @РатниК-ч1ш Год назад +1

      Хаха😂🇷🇺

    • @РатниК-ч1ш
      @РатниК-ч1ш Год назад

      We are a white race🤷‍♂️

    • @Андрей-о3т2у
      @Андрей-о3т2у Год назад +1

      У США бумажная оружие это уже не для кого не секрет

    • @pandibbarman
      @pandibbarman Год назад

      ​@@Андрей-о3т2уThen why countries like india who has been buying Russian weapons for decades are buying US weapons instead? 😭☠️

  • @strontiumend
    @strontiumend Год назад +6

    is that chinese hpj an anti air?
    edit: (yep it's an anti air)

  • @hfmexe0657
    @hfmexe0657 Год назад +3

    Juraría que todos son cañones automáticos pero sus funciones son distintas.

  • @wagakkisugoi331
    @wagakkisugoi331 Год назад

    will you take slow accurate shot or fast random shot's?

  • @MuLLIka_2022
    @MuLLIka_2022 Год назад

    there are different guns on different ships, this comparison is still worth comparing An-2 with a fighter, there is not such a big difference in this comparison, but the essence is clear.

  • @k0a2k0e1
    @k0a2k0e1 Год назад +48

    弾薬の重さ違うだろww

  • @bigmak9636
    @bigmak9636 Год назад +5

    The trouble with the Russian one is they have not fingered out how to fire the guns when the ship is on the sea bottom

  • @ivcharon1859
    @ivcharon1859 Год назад +25

    (*`3´))ペッ﹅って吐き出してるのなんか可愛い😘

  • @ВалерийЧекмазов

    Я этот ролик, уже видел несколько раз. Только под другими флагами. Все равно не видно, кто куда попал.

  • @WoT-j4j
    @WoT-j4j Год назад +1

    China наши друзья!)

  • @휴머니스트-n6h
    @휴머니스트-n6h Год назад +4

    차이나는 도대체 목표물이 무엇이냐?? 아무나 맞아랏???

  • @luisernestomontenegrogarci2496
    @luisernestomontenegrogarci2496 Год назад +4

    China: HOLD MY BING CHILLING

  • @О.Р.К
    @О.Р.К Год назад +8

    Последняя сломалась, по ходу. 🫣

    • @Alex-vv3my
      @Alex-vv3my Год назад

      Это наверное проверка .

  • @wyattjenkins7898
    @wyattjenkins7898 Год назад

    Lmao, y’all saying the Chinese guns targeting system is broke. Not even just showing off the capabilities of their gun. From what I can see their naval gun can not only engage ships but planes as well

  • @narach3244
    @narach3244 Год назад

    Where are you aiming at?

  • @Verttix9
    @Verttix9 Год назад +4

    that chinese gunner is having the time of their life

  • @JonathanRodriguez-sf9yg
    @JonathanRodriguez-sf9yg Год назад +12

    No creo q sea tan rápida la china y ninguna hablando de esos calibres

    • @mediador9161
      @mediador9161 Год назад +1

      Pues lo son

    • @ghostsaide6488
      @ghostsaide6488 Год назад

      El arma china vista en el short, es un H/PJ-26 de 76,2mm una variante autónoma de AK-176 (¡no es una copia!), claramente va disparar más rápido que los cañones Mark 45 y Ak-130, con una cadencia de 120 dis/min

  • @akasakaasjsaa1987
    @akasakaasjsaa1987 Год назад +5

    中国の砲口径小さいし、オーバーヒートしそう😮

    • @shamrock6378
      @shamrock6378 Год назад

      なんなら焼けクソでもぶっ放すか

  • @SergeyYagupov
    @SergeyYagupov Год назад

    When do I need to update my military stock?

  • @godabhayyt3182
    @godabhayyt3182 Год назад +1

    US :- BLOW THAT HOUSE OFF ON THAT COAST... burgers
    RUSSIANS:- BLOW TAHT SHIT OUT OF THAT COAST.. vodka
    CHINESE:- WHICH COAST PREMIER... Bing chillin
    💀💀💀💀💀

  • @chandlerpeters539
    @chandlerpeters539 Год назад +5

    You also leave out the part where the American gun shoots just as fast as the Chinese gun

  • @ニャルラトポテフ-v1r
    @ニャルラトポテフ-v1r Год назад +5

    対空砲のような荒ぶり方だな。

    • @laozhang3657
      @laozhang3657 Год назад +1

      酸啊,中国用的是制导炮弹,精度最高,可以防空,也可以打击小型舰艇。

    • @にとろん-v8g
      @にとろん-v8g Год назад +2

      中国語知らんけど「精度最高」ってあってめちゃくちゃに草w

  • @Kriptoxx01
    @Kriptoxx01 Год назад +4

    🇨🇳🇨🇳👏👏 blessed machine gun mashallah

    • @AB-media15
      @AB-media15 Год назад +1

      Its said in quran , all non muslims are togather. Muslims are happier in USA than in russia and china. But my muslim guy here is praising a small chinese gun which is just 64mm compared to 127 mm american and 130 mm russian gun. 😂😂😂

  • @ScaryFoot
    @ScaryFoot Год назад

    I mean an automatic 76mm isnt rare.. the Italians have been making those for a long time and with efficiency.

  • @SMILING432
    @SMILING432 Год назад +1

    U.S.A : steady, slow, aim, FIRE!
    Russia : GET THAT THING DOWN FAST! I DON'T CARE WHAT ARE YOU AIMING!
    China : SHOOT! SHOOT! JUST SHOOT!

  • @달려라-v1x
    @달려라-v1x Год назад +5

    중국거 지리는데??? 근데 왜 안맞았지???

  • @HanKaR1n
    @HanKaR1n Год назад +4

    중국은 함포를 기관포으로 만들어버리네
    근데 맞긴 하려나 ㅋㅋ

  • @user-lv7xh7zt71
    @user-lv7xh7zt71 Год назад +5

    中国さんノリノリで草

  • @Ditrih_Kofman
    @Ditrih_Kofman Год назад

    Система управления огнём китайской пушки : Я пришел сюда что бы пострелять с настоящими мужиками ))))))))))

  • @markrayes2973
    @markrayes2973 Год назад

    seems like the chinese operator was told to put that gun through a stress test 😂😂😂

  • @stardust9072
    @stardust9072 Год назад +6

    i love russian songs

  • @hi-hl7mw
    @hi-hl7mw Год назад +8

    当たらなければどうということはない。