"Police" ??? Just becuae it states it their clothing does not mean they are doing ANYTHING to justify that term .. It should have "TAX STEALERS" instead of police .. They used to have 6ft and EX military that actually policed the streets of the UK .. NOW look at the panderers . DISGUSTING TAX THIEVES
LEGALS Don't forget to ask the question when you see blue tape or similar ... "which section of which Act prevents me from walking through here"? Remember, if it's not dangerous, and there's no CSI to protect, and you don't stop them walking about ("interference") then they have no powers to stop you, to touch you, or direct you in any way. This is a free country. There is no "blue tape Act".
Since when did life become so boring to people that they feel the need to film every single blasted thing of every single day, no matter who may have been injured or even worse through the event??
Yes I often wonder why the news has to film things, or accidents or fires or just people in background. Really terrible that 'people' film for dissemination
If you don't want to be filmed, then why draw attention to yourself "karen" by bleating about how much you don't want to be filmed. That almost guarantees you're not only going to get filmed more but then end up on RUclips
Maybe see what I was recording before thinking I was being disrespectful. Filming for local news website ruclips.net/video/NK0-CQO6Aj8/видео.htmlsi=xAHNL7rwSgH55Hko
Isn’t this what mainstream media outlets pay Reuters and other photographic agencies literally millions and millions of pounds for footage every year for?
All these people saying well done 😂😂 you do realise that these clowns with cameras only do this for money it’s nothing to do with rights, if that was true where was they all before RUclips became a cash cow think about it🤦♂️
They have the right to film, period. How much money they acquire from what theyve recorded is absolutely irrelevant to their right to do so. If they're not harassing anyone, there should be no issue. If someone doesn't have any respect towards this right, then they may end up harassing them the same way the old lady did, unnecessarily.
@@joshpotts7640 it’s we have a right to film not they🤦♂️ you are missing the point of what I’m saying, yes we have rights to film and take photos, however if you stick a camera in someone’s face at a sensitive moment because you know they won’t be happy and you will money from their reaction because you upload to RUclips, then you need to ask yourself if you have any morals in life instead of hiding behind it’s my right to film etc. So I ask you again where was these camera clowns before RUclips started paying did our rights not apply back then? Or only now because it pays to harass people this behaviour will result in a change 100%
Hahaha. NOOOOoooooooo!! In public, fair game. You ever been to a concert or football match or even on a street during news broadcast. You think photographers and TV get consent. And they make money... Wish I made money Do you get consent for every photo you have on Facebook that has random people in the background. Same thing mate. No expectation of privacy on public PINAC. Use your freedoms or lose 'em
Police busy causing maximum disruption as usual!
"Police" ???
Just becuae it states it their clothing does not mean they are doing ANYTHING to justify that term .. It should have "TAX STEALERS" instead of police ..
They used to have 6ft and EX military that actually policed the streets of the UK .. NOW look at the panderers . DISGUSTING TAX THIEVES
And we all know why the police hate cameras
ABSOFUCKINGLUTELY!!!!
because it shows how inept they are.?............
@@JL-rx6hl corrupt....
Karen objects to public filming before getting her camera out......
They whip out their phone like it's an AK47!!!!!....Idiots.
and PC Karen
You have the potential to be good at this. You should do more.
We're not going to make it; humans I mean...
Is there any useful female cop ?
I've sure NEVER came across one!!!
voor achter het fornuis wel en 1 die de afwas doet!!
Well, perhaps ask the families of WPC Yvonne Fletcher, and officers Nicola Hughes and Fiona Bone.
I don't see one Karen. I see two now.
Silly bird
Well handled
One look and you could tell she is a Karen.
Always film them never stop filming
For what? To prove you have absolutely no life?
@@jakehamilton9352 film them for your own protection and this is a good cause as they are corrupt and they film you so to bad on that one Jakey
Nothing else to do
@@jakehamilton9352 Don't you like freedom and accountability?
@@jakehamilton9352 Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than speak and remove all doubt.....Nice one Jake!
Police policing with feelings. They won’t last long as a police officer if a somebody with a camera causes them to be that outraged.
Useless jobsworth.
well done
LEGALS
Don't forget to ask the question when you see blue tape or similar ... "which section of which Act prevents me from walking through here"?
Remember, if it's not dangerous, and there's no CSI to protect, and you don't stop them walking about ("interference") then they have no powers to stop you, to touch you, or direct you in any way. This is a free country. There is no "blue tape Act".
Earning their hate
😂😂😂😂🤦🏼♀️😑
Well done for making them both world famous 👏👏👏👏
Woman complains about someone filming and then does exactly the thing she was complaining about!
Hypocrite Karen’s are breading
You are right !
Britain’s going Bonkers
Feelings enforcer.😅😅😅
Well done mate make em av it
Tell her to shut her trap and get on with her job. No point in arguing with these feelings police.
Cam back Karen ... loon squad.
Deluded thinking they can tell people what to do and where to stand.
Silly old cow.
Looks more like Darren with falsies than Karen 🤪
Corrupt cops Cornwall
Not everything needs to be filmed just to get a reaction for your channel.
Correct.... I don't want a reaction....
I just want to be left a alone to film a bit of footage to go with the news report.
Since when did life become so boring to people that they feel the need to film every single blasted thing of every single day, no matter who may have been injured or even worse through the event??
Yes I often wonder why the news has to film things, or accidents or fires or just people in background. Really terrible that 'people' film for dissemination
If you don't want to be filmed, then why draw attention to yourself "karen" by bleating about how much you don't want to be filmed. That almost guarantees you're not only going to get filmed more but then end up on RUclips
And then get your phone out and do the thing you complain about LOL
WHAT AAAAAAA WWAANNKKEERR
Police woman had dumbo ears. Very rare on a woman.
And it appears she has a cavity problem: there's a cavity between those ears.
Sad little manchild
Good little bootlicker
So why are you actually filming an accident scene, hoping for a reaction?..Phone mad bleeding population, put it away ffs
Or... Now here me out... If someone has the right to do something, maybe leave them tf alone and mind your own business? Just a thought...
He's just filming something in public. Not bothering anyone, They didn't need to bother him.
Do you ask the same question when your evening news broadcast does the same?
Maybe see what I was recording before thinking I was being disrespectful. Filming for local news website
ruclips.net/video/NK0-CQO6Aj8/видео.htmlsi=xAHNL7rwSgH55Hko
Isn’t this what mainstream media outlets pay Reuters and other photographic agencies literally millions and millions of pounds for footage every year for?
I agree with the Woman, use some compassion.
Knob
@@elboy6715 Yep I've got one.
Compassion for what? An empty junction, some twisted metal?
Watch the video of what I actually filmed, didn't even see any people
ruclips.net/video/NK0-CQO6Aj8/видео.htmlsi=xAHNL7rwSgH55Hko
@@kernowaudits Why film it then, get a life.
All these people saying well done 😂😂 you do realise that these clowns with cameras only do this for money it’s nothing to do with rights, if that was true where was they all before RUclips became a cash cow think about it🤦♂️
They have the right to film, period. How much money they acquire from what theyve recorded is absolutely irrelevant to their right to do so. If they're not harassing anyone, there should be no issue. If someone doesn't have any respect towards this right, then they may end up harassing them the same way the old lady did, unnecessarily.
@@joshpotts7640 it’s we have a right to film not they🤦♂️ you are missing the point of what I’m saying, yes we have rights to film and take photos, however if you stick a camera in someone’s face at a sensitive moment because you know they won’t be happy and you will money from their reaction because you upload to RUclips, then you need to ask yourself if you have any morals in life instead of hiding behind it’s my right to film etc. So I ask you again where was these camera clowns before RUclips started paying did our rights not apply back then? Or only now because it pays to harass people this behaviour will result in a change 100%
Knob
@@elboy6715 clearly educated 🤦♂️
@@superfoxes7204he didn't stick a camera in someone's face what are you talking about?
if you post photos on line you have to get the persons consent, if you make money from said photos that is also against the law
Hahaha. NOOOOoooooooo!!
In public, fair game. You ever been to a concert or football match or even on a street during news broadcast. You think photographers and TV get consent. And they make money... Wish I made money
Do you get consent for every photo you have on Facebook that has random people in the background. Same thing mate.
No expectation of privacy on public
PINAC. Use your freedoms or lose 'em
@@kernowaudits it is against the law
No its not. @@micklemass
@@carlhaydock1787 yes it is look it up
Hope you have never taken a photo in public then and got random people in the shot... I'll check out your socials a min 😂😉
Less power than a flat battery 🔋
More uneducated uniforms