Having, worked with perpetrators of abuse , I have heard all the excuses under the sun from distorted perceptions of faith ( and I am talking all faith here ) to "she didn't iron my shirt properly".I know of no faith that prescribes abuse in contemporary society, however I have met lots of individuals who use any excuse to justify partner violence. Religions don't perpetrate abuse , individuals do , and they have a choice it's called free will!!
I don’t think you are taking into account a sociological aspect where socio-economic factors such as poverty can indeed engender addiction issues-which in turn influence abusive or violent relationships. Good video nonetheless. 👍.
@@Counsellingtutor1 Religions may not directly perpetrated abuse but the scriptures do allow the normalisation of abuse, and give social license. In some religions it is expected behaviour. People may ridicule you if you don't. It's almost like if mistreatment of household workers is okay in a group, and you being part of the group don't endorse it, the group will ridicule you as a defense mechanism because your views threaten the group's value and indirectly it's "ways of being."
The slide in time 5:37 is not consistent with Wikipedia Attachment theory. Ambivalent/Resistant Caregiver: Inconsistent between appropriate and neglectful responses. Generally will only respond after increased attachment behavior from the infant.
The key feature of ambivalent attachment is that the parent figure is INCONSISTENT - sometimes available and other times not. This is what creates the ambivalence. The child does not know how the adult is going to react - so they crave the attention but they resent it at the same time.
I think the info on Avoidant and Ambivalent was incorrect. Avoidant attachment is when a caregiver has little or no response to a child’s needs; Ambivalent attachment is when a caregiver responds inconsistently to a child’s needs, the caregiver is sometimes sensitive, sometimes neglectful.
Really helpful when reading notes on children's panel hearings and being able to relate the information to what I have just watched here, Will be looking into this some more for sure. Thank you.
Ainsworth was a student and then colleage of John Bowlby :) There's a great journal I'm using for my assessment called "The origins of Attachment Theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth" by Inge Bretherton (1992) if you're interested, it would be worth a read
Slightly disappointed that the author of the video credited Bowlby with the attachment styles and not Mary Ainsworth who termed the first three (secure, ambivalent, and resistant), or Mary Main, who later identified the disorganized type.
Thank you so much for this. I have watched a number of your videos in perpetration for my exams and they have helped greatly. Keep up the good work and thank you
Thankyou for your reply. My concern was more to do with the nature of Islamic spousal abuse, or any abuse that occurs in a marriage with the apparent permission of religions. I am hoping the future shapes healthier human attachment in marriage and indeed healthier detachment during divorce. :)
Hamda Ahmd tap the triangle on the right below the video, then click on counsellingtutor.com. Scroll down and there is a link there that mentions references /resources...
How does our society explain when the 'sense of self-entitlement' of abuse of power - when occurs in marriage. In terms of domestic violence, is the violent partner suffering an 'attachment disorder'?
Ainsworth was Bowlby's pupil. Therefore their theory is relatively the same and hard to separate, hence why most teachers tend to teach both together as Bowlby's and Ainsworth's attachment theory
To refute some obsolete pseudo-feminist critique. Primary caregiver does not have to be female. It can be male too. Also, primary caregiver does not have to be biological parent. Male are well equppied to provide sustainable child care as long as they have been brought up and educated in how to do it (not talking about physiological abilities like breast feeding etc) . No one is born with such knowledge, neither males nor females. You learn it on the way. Sadly, in our culture, males are not brought up to have capacity to express and learn such behaviour as it is delusionary considered as unmanly.
Ainsworth's research came to prominence in the 1970s, 20 years after post-war governments had leveraged Bowlby's Thieves study,(1944) to allow returning Soldiers to go back to employment, they also removed nursery provision.
The caregiver behaviour in this video is the wrong way round. Children with Ambivalent attachment had parents who were inconsistent. Children with Avoidant attachment had parents who were unavailable and encouraged independence.
As a counselor I understand the goal with this theory - however....as a Christian, we know this is not our home and our primary relationship is with Jesus Christ. When we walk in his ways, you would be amazed at how well he heals our troubled hearts and our troubled relationships.
I just wish that all these presenters will use a better talking to explain theory rather than reading than out. The contents are good. But I get nothing out of your reading.
My teacher showed this to our psychology class in Australia , for our exams found it really helpful , thankyou :)
Having, worked with perpetrators of abuse , I have heard all the excuses under the sun from distorted perceptions of faith ( and I am talking all faith here ) to "she didn't iron my shirt properly".I know of no faith that prescribes abuse in contemporary society, however I have met lots of individuals who use any excuse to justify partner violence. Religions don't perpetrate abuse , individuals do , and they have a choice it's called free will!!
I don’t think you are taking into account a sociological aspect where socio-economic factors such as poverty can indeed engender addiction issues-which in turn influence abusive or violent relationships. Good video nonetheless. 👍.
@@Counsellingtutor1 Religions may not directly perpetrated abuse but the scriptures do allow the normalisation of abuse, and give social license. In some religions it is expected behaviour. People may ridicule you if you don't. It's almost like if mistreatment of household workers is okay in a group, and you being part of the group don't endorse it, the group will ridicule you as a defense mechanism because your views threaten the group's value and indirectly it's "ways of being."
Congratulations, its a magnificent explanation.
You are a god and have saved my academic life!!! Thank you
The avoidant/ambivalent caregiver behaviours are switched here I think, good to be wary of that. Otherwise, this video is helpful!
Fully agreed. I think he confused them
Thank you for sharing. It is helpful as I am preparing for my presentation about this theory next week.
Thanks alot this came in handy❤
Thank you very much for this greatly structured and informative presentation about the attachment theory!
Great content, easy to understand. Thank you for providing this great resource.
Thank you for sharing your information and making it so accessible, xx
Doing an essay on attachment for uni... U just saved me a lot of time! Thank you!
hellooo
The slide in time 5:37 is not consistent with Wikipedia Attachment theory.
Ambivalent/Resistant
Caregiver:
Inconsistent between appropriate and neglectful responses. Generally will only respond after increased attachment behavior from the infant.
This was done so well, thank you.
super duper....helpful to my assignment:)
You get right to the heart of the matter. Great job! Thank you!!!
Thanks for creating the content. Easy language and great explaining of theories.
The key feature of ambivalent attachment is that the parent figure is INCONSISTENT - sometimes available and other times not. This is what creates the ambivalence. The child does not know how the adult is going to react - so they crave the attention but they resent it at the same time.
+Martin Goodwin Pretty much what I alluded to in the video
+CounsellingResource I think you mixed up caregiver behavior for ambivalent attachment and avoidant attachment.
I think the info on Avoidant and Ambivalent was incorrect. Avoidant attachment is when a caregiver has little or no response to a child’s needs; Ambivalent attachment is when a caregiver responds inconsistently to a child’s needs, the caregiver is sometimes sensitive, sometimes neglectful.
This is quite informative and straight to the point 👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️
I think the caregiver's behavior from the avoidant and ambivalent is reversed.
Great explanation! Thank-you🙏🏼
Really helpful when reading notes on children's panel hearings and being able to relate the information to what I have just watched here, Will be looking into this some more for sure. Thank you.
I thought the attachment types stemmed from Mary Ainsworth and her 'Strange situation'.
Ainsworth was a student and then colleage of John Bowlby :) There's a great journal I'm using for my assessment called "The origins of Attachment Theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth" by Inge Bretherton (1992) if you're interested, it would be worth a read
Merci pour ces présentations en anglais...Je suis étudiante en psycho et cela va m'aider...
Amazing. Very helpful. Thank you!
Lovely video, extremely helpful, do you do private lessons? cheers buddy ;) xoxoxox
think you got Ambivalent and Avoident mixed up here?
Slightly disappointed that the author of the video credited Bowlby with the attachment styles and not Mary Ainsworth who termed the first three (secure, ambivalent, and resistant), or Mary Main, who later identified the disorganized type.
Good and effective one...😍😍you give what we want😃😃 Thank you so much☺☺ once again..㊗️㊗️
Thank you so much for this. I have watched a number of your videos in perpetration for my exams and they have helped greatly. Keep up the good work and thank you
Very enlightening, I'm the proponent of this theory myself...
That's awesome. Thank you sir !
Thankyou for your reply. My concern was more to do with the nature of Islamic spousal abuse, or any abuse that occurs in a marriage with the apparent permission of religions. I am hoping the future shapes healthier human attachment in marriage and indeed healthier detachment during divorce. :)
Well done, good teaching!
very helpful thank you
Very good!
Thank you
this helped so much with my first assignment. thank you!
can you help me coz had assignments to submit this week 😢😢😢
Nice explanation
Some mix up between ambivalent and avoidant here
My second video on attachment expands on the theory and indeed credits Ainsworh for developing attachment styles.
Where can be relate the attachment theory into the learnered center principles?
Really helpful piece
Great exam revision thanks!
Thanks a lot!!
Can you please provide the resources ?
Hamda Ahmd tap the triangle on the right below the video, then click on counsellingtutor.com. Scroll down and there is a link there that mentions references /resources...
Thanks heaps! Really helpful for my psych studies. :)
p dot s - where are you from? I couldn't quite place the accent!
Very good.
How does our society explain when the 'sense of self-entitlement' of abuse of power - when occurs in marriage. In terms of domestic violence, is the violent partner suffering an 'attachment disorder'?
you forgot one thing, its not a BOND! a bond is a one way relationship, this si TWO WAY
Correct me if i'm wrong, but isn't the attachment theory undertaken by Mary Ainsworth?
Bowlby 69 - Ainsworth 73 watch the other videos to find out more
Ainsworth was Bowlby's pupil. Therefore their theory is relatively the same and hard to separate, hence why most teachers tend to teach both together as Bowlby's and Ainsworth's attachment theory
Interesting.
on the caregiver behaviour
To refute some obsolete pseudo-feminist critique.
Primary caregiver does not have to be female. It can be male too.
Also, primary caregiver does not have to be biological parent.
Male are well equppied to provide sustainable child care as long as they have been brought up and educated in how to do it (not talking about physiological abilities like breast feeding etc) . No one is born with such knowledge, neither males nor females. You learn it on the way.
Sadly, in our culture, males are not brought up to have capacity to express and learn such behaviour as it is delusionary considered as unmanly.
having disorganized attachment is TUFF sometimes you gotta be daddy
That conspiracy loses much of its ‘weight’ when one factors in Mary Ainsworth
Ainsworth's research came to prominence in the 1970s, 20 years after post-war governments had leveraged Bowlby's Thieves study,(1944) to allow returning Soldiers to go back to employment, they also removed nursery provision.
cool
The caregiver behaviour in this video is the wrong way round. Children with Ambivalent attachment had parents who were inconsistent. Children with Avoidant attachment had parents who were unavailable and encouraged independence.
As a counselor I understand the goal with this theory - however....as a Christian, we know this is not our home and our primary relationship is with Jesus Christ. When we walk in his ways, you would be amazed at how well he heals our troubled hearts and our troubled relationships.
Yes you are correct , have you seen this presentation
ruclips.net/video/xot1B5E5oOo/видео.html
I just wish that all these presenters will use a better talking to explain theory rather than reading than out. The contents are good. But I get nothing out of your reading.
"A better talking" I come from Manchester - we all pretty much talk like this, and there is only one presenter.
Thank you