I think the english speaking audiance might have missunderstood dr jung here. I as a native german speaker think he is referring to himself (jung), as not beeing welcome to the discussion, cause einstein had his fixed ideas. Dr jung kinda uses english words with german sentence construction and pronounciation ^^
Dont watch it, one view less, you did your part on helping in stopping these videos. You chose your reality to some extent, you cannot change everything around you. Simply put, if you dont like it, dont watch it, it is that easy.
I understand what he said clearly.. if your study was not mathematically documented along with the evidence Dr enstine lacked enthusiasm for the subject.
@@edwarda5584 that's almost impossible in a psyche study, except in material/empirical stuff, where the variables aren't even clear and the laws don't seem to be very firm
@@bezbezzebbyson788The big questions asked by classical psychologists have evolved into matters other scientists can address. Classical psychology was never able to pay off William James' wish that "...by treating Psychology like a natural science, to help her to become one."
Unless we are able to hear their original discussion, we have no way of judging for ourselves. Einstein could have easily said: in relativity we are looking at physical realities-but humane phycology is a mingling of concepts.
@thesurvivorssanctuary6561 Einstein wasn't open to God. Just like when the Catholic Priest who developed the Big Bang theory pointed out Einstein was saying there is a high probability that God exists. Einstein went back and tried changing his work but saw there was no way to do it. Understand when I say God, I don't mean the superstitious sky daddy. I mean the Infinite Consciousness that everything flows from. As Jung said I KNOW God exists and the math is even starting to say it.
I think it's that Einstein was a man of reason, and Jung wasn't, so Einstein wasn't interested in discussing Jung's crackpot ideas, and Jung is trying to put it down to Einstein's lack of openness.
Not roasting, just speaking facts. When you are highly specialized, there’s no room for multidisciplinary thought. That’s not a negative it is by necessity a byproduct of specialization.
At that time multi discipline thinking was not yet the case, I think, more 'closed' concepts, no internet yet... Wich takes ideas fast forward, and mixed medea
@@jankehaga8735All science disciplines were created from one - Philosophy. So no, multi discipline is an old concept actually. Which got a new developer in modern era.
@@atius8571 yes oké in the beginning of 'science' I can understand the world was more seen as a whole, mythic experienced, I don't exactly know when 'scientific' thinking started
They transcribed the words wrong. He is basically saying Einstein has so much physics and maths to think about that he doesn't have much time to discuss psychological things with Jung
So i would have to ask more questions would it be similar to hexagonal (locked position )depression (or a, b-x, y magnetism ) when you refer to e= mc²/ e=mc²= current condition at scale idk
This is the real reason this world stuck with the current consciousness we have. We put science as the ONLY thing to believe, to be an “ mainstream”. Yes science has done so many great things for humanity, and we need it to continue working for humanity. But many quantum mechanics can’t calculate or explain because this area’s actually indeed is only can explained by the existence of spirit in the universe. We all part of it, and the scientists put this part away like we made by just some kind of data, not matter.
I think he noticed that Einstein took being concentrated on his own work and being a mathematician on top of that as a compliment so he roasted Einstein by saying "your not welcome"
To be fair to Einstein here, there couldn't be a bigger philosophical gap between these two. A committed scientist can't really engage in the idea of the unconscious, especially in the way Jung conceived it.
Jung’s conception of the unconscious is distinctly not Freudian. Freud's conception of the unconscious focuses on repressed personal experiences, desires, and traumatic memories, primarily driven by sexual and aggressive instincts. Jung, on the other hand, expands the unconscious to include both the personal unconscious and the collective unconscious, which contains universal archetypes and symbols shared across humanity. Freud's approach emphasizes resolving repressed conflicts through psychoanalysis, whereas Jung's approach emphasizes achieving individuation by integrating both personal and collective unconscious elements. Thus, Freud's view is more individually centered, while Jung's incorporates a broader, more universal perspective.
@@quentinkumba6746 Thank you for the correction (will edit my comment). My point was the general idea of the unconscious as a "thing" was derived from Freud I think.
@@learnnowspeaknow - yes, and my criticism was a bit overdone because Jung began with Freud’s ideas as a base from which to depart. Ultimately Jung takes a view of the unconscious and especially of archetypes as being structural principles of the universeitself. Jung worked with Wolfgang Pauli the quantum physicist to try and explain mathematics and physics in terms of archetypes. This leads him along long way away from Freud but he starts with Freud.
The caption is unnecessarily sensational & not accurate. This wasnt a roast, merely a fact as Jung viewed it, that their ways of thinking didn’t mesh - that Jung’s view was basically unwelcome to Einstein.
Thats precisely what I was thinking as well.😊 And Einstein probably meant that psychological theories and ways of thinking ARE relative and subjective ( which they are )....depending on subjective assessments...as opposed to a scientists view of the natural world ( which is more absolute ...and definable more stringently ).
Einstein's son, Eduard Einstein, was a big fan of Psychoanalysis, especially Freud. He even wrote some interesting things about his father's psyche. But more interesting is what Albert Einstein thought about psychoanalysis: “It may not always be helpful to delve into the subconscious,” he once said. “Our legs are controlled by a hundred different muscles. Do you think it would help us to walk if we analyzed our legs and knew the exact purpose of each muscle and the order in which they work?” Source: Isaacson, 2007
Highly, HIGHLY recommend Jung’s book - ‘Modern Man In Search of a Soul’. The wisdom he provides is invaluable, and our world is in dire need of such wisdom. Now more than ever
Teaching in a university in the Third Reich and still have the courages Ego against those who tried to stop the cancer called nazism, this is something I’m amazed.
What he's saying is that Albert Einstein told him that he was not welcome to Einstein's Theory of Relativity because Einstein was arrogantly could not care less about any nonmaterial topic such as evolutionary psychology.
This is so misleading. Jung is saying that no one could understand Einstein because he is an introverted thinker. Anyone could hardly understand what Einstein thinks so it would be hard to convince him otherwise because his knowledge is fixed and reasonable. It would take much to convince him to an idea. Not a roast but a compliment from a psychoanalytical way.
Not quite. Jung is actually saying Einstein is incapable of listening to other's intellectual ideas. It fits Einstein's history, and REALLY shows off how unbearable a husband he must've been with his wife.
@@thesurvivorssanctuary6561I agree. Its the typical arrogance of the natural scientist,who thinks he has the key to everything in the universe...!! Even if its a great mind like Einstein......
Wrong subs … “when a man is so concentrated on his own idea “ meaning when he’s stuck in his own box he knows everything in that box and won’t allow it to open cause he’s holding onto what fits his narrative. There is no way for new ideas to come into that box because It threatens the very existence of that box itself . No one wants those beliefs to fly out since we worked so hard to identify ourselves with them
Einestien might be right.. i feel like it could apply to himan psyche.. when u have a major cosmic law like that it usually applies to so many aspects.. especially that human psyche develops above & below certain rules or levels.. some are more advanced than others..
relativity isn't a law, it's a compilation of descriptions of reality. It's not the same thing. Thermodynamics? Those are laws. In a closed system, energy cannot be destroyed or created, only transformed. This can apply to other fields such as economics or sociology, because it's a universal law, but relativity isn't like thermodynamics.
the problem with Einstein and scientists like that is that they think everything is set in stone and they are the smartest, also the same is feud between Jung and Froyd, I can say Jung was a thinker and Froyd just like a boy who does not really understand science but plays along like he does....
You are not welcome means relativity is not the only perspective. einstein missed the other view by not accomodating any new ideas. I never liked the concept of relativity by einstein. Chris Nolan made a film on a flawed concept.
@@tizoc4999 foundations are flawed. for any research question, we seek to frst understand by defining. So Define water - A substance in 3 states, sorry now 4 states... etc and so on and so forth. 1. Definition. A definition is arrived at only after the theory is understood. Define Gravity? Current definition is flawed. Define relativity? That is flawed. Define Time? So when you take flawed definitions for research, the conclusion and foundations are all wrong. The outcomes will be wrong :/. Carl Jung would have added a perspective. Sadly einstein lost the opportunity to learn, his ego got the better of him. Study INDIA's ancient texts you will get some perspective. The indigenous - after years of observation got astronomy and what not. Stay humble to learn. or like einstein... Oy Vey ! is all we have for him. Dark matter is Ether that keeps all orbital mass and trajectory in its set destination. But who will listen. ether controls what happens. the Divine void or Divine Darkness' hands are Ether is. Divine design, discover it. Its not relative. Its the same static all over the multiverse, omni verses. It does not change. Slow and fast you may say vary. But for the observer only, Subjectively. Not objectively. All is flawed because the people who set the alphabet on science wanted us to be in the dark (No Knowlegde) But knowledge is truth and that always surfaces. Universal truths. rest i leave to your discovery. ruclips.net/video/aUtdLfdnpzs/видео.html BBC did an article. But its vague too :) Let those who seek, find. All the best. Its not going to change your life's trajectory. Still, Discover.
@@tizoc4999 I don't know what precisely OP is talking about, but the two issues I can think about are: - It's incomensurate with QM - Mach's principle I don't really know how relativity pertains to psychic function. The question seems underspecified; are we saying that somehow psychic function is significantly affected by gravity, or that there is a (specious) relativity associated with psychic function?
So Jung couldn’t talk to Einstein because he didn’t believe in Einsteins capacity to have an open mind? That sounds to me like Jung was the one with a closed mind.
We don't have free will but we have conciousness and knowledge, and that knowledge will help us to work well in this world .The knowledge is responsibility for functioning of society .The fact is here who is providing knowledge and what we type of knowledge considering that we human not perfect being
Einstein’s quantum ghost! He did not believe in after life, he was a mathematician … Jung did believe… “peculiar faculties of the psyche not confined to time/space. Two opposite men!
A philosopher and a physics professor in one room is nothing but disaster. As the hood Wittgenstein once said: “There are mathematical problems, biological problems, but philosophy does not have real problems.”
Jung was basically calling Einstein arrogant, and unable to listen to others. If true, then it's no wonder his wife was okay with his divorcing her. He sounds unbearable to a fellow intellectual who doesn't initially pique his curiosity.
Basically Einstein was a table, its purpose in life is to have items placed on it everything else is irrelevant, where as others are a bicycle its only function is to traverse distances, anything else is irrelevant , i think all academics in their respected fields are like this
Not really a surprising disconnect. Einstein had an incisive mind focused on the logical implications of facts and mathematical inferences. Jung's mind searched for patterns in the fuzzy manifestations of subconscious mental process. It's like trying to find common ground for conversation between an Eskimo and a professional basketball player. Different worlds!
I would imagine a person buried in numbers would have a very hard time talking about the abstract. We all know the spooky quantum story...he couldn't find his way around that.
Basically Carl Jung said he is not a Physicist nor a Mathematician, so applying relativity to psyche is beyond his scope. Thus, I never see someone apply relativity to Psychology..?
The fabric of spacetime is affected by the gravity of our thougts..into the present Can we change the past.. Yes.. When we change the future with our thoughts ..the future then writes its past as the present .. Theory of .real.ativity U see the signal of that in synchromysticity talked about by carl jung.. Here is an example : People wakiing up to the debt matrix that has hijacked the debt matrix Utube : occult law of commerce jason whitney And the solution to the problem .mits abject representation is read by the creatives and potrayed in abstract form in trailers ..via words and pictures Utube : current war trailer Our subconscious is like the worm hole feeding energy .and info from the collective subconscious into the balck hole which is future spacetime... But when the individual wakes up to the subconscious collective programming if the debt matrix then we can individuallu affect the future or talk to it..and interact with it ..the proof of that is the clues and sunchromysitic events it uses to talk to us via sights and symbols and words...becuase we gave changed the future ... Theory of relativity can be used as an analogy as to how the waking cinscious is tied to the subconscious and its feedback to and from the superconsciousness . .black hole sun .. Study the debt matrix to get out of it ..and then u see ..especially in trailers how the future talks to u ...and introduces and informs its presence ..in abstract from from the creatives who unknowingly tap into that superconscious fabric.. They use sumbols like black madonna..Mother ..Sea .. Etc... U only see what your eyes want to see.. If u want to see the Sea, the Sea will show itself to u Utube : madonna frozen
Well some people are very smart in one area while clueless in another this apply also to Einstein as well as to Jung. And the clip here showcase that fact very well.
Theories of mind ride the coattails of theoretical physics. Here they talk about how relativity might affect the mind in much the same way that philosophy of the mind today has latched onto quantum mechanics.
jung also couldn't understand math in grade school. it just never clicked for him, so he likely wasn't able to follow with einsteins ideas. both specialized in different things. on jung;s side, it likely wasn't a 'roast', just an observation that he acknowledged as subjective
There’s no reason to call this a roast.. he’s a psychologist he’s doing what he does-that is, making observations of and speaking about human nature. Please try to avoid commodifying genuine intellectuals who offer truly liberating knowledge, as soon as something is commodified it becomes obsolete.
Ah yes in other words we get in our own way and in order to experience the miracle of Life we often need help smashing the Self Will to allow such a drastic paradigm shift.
I feel like cacophobia - prejudice against unnattractive people - is a severely underexplored issue, particularly with how it intersects with things like queerphobia and ableism.
I think that depends on what you mean by metaphysics. Considering he objected to quantum non-locality based on the "reality" principle, I'd think that would count on some definitions.
@@ericm9495Einstein was primarily a theoretical physicist and areas like psychology/study of consciouness (especially the Jungian) and spirituality, in general, cross over deeply to what can be termed as metaphysics. That's why he argued to the bitter end agains quantum physics because he thought "God doesn't play dice with the universe." In his mind, probably, anything that cannot be explained /reduced to some neat mathematical equation cannot be true science.
@@socialjunkster But the term "Metaphysics" doesn't just mean "study of the supernatural/spiritual". It's used in philosophy to mean, among other things, the study of reality as it really is, independent of our perceptions. So my point is that by that definition, his objections to QM were on metaphyiscal grounds. As are his objections to QM that he based on his commitment to determinism. There are people, like the logical positivists, who scoff at metaphysics as "the study of reality independent of perceptions" just as there are people who scoff at "the study of the supernatural". So I just thought your original comment needed clarification. I'm also not sure where your last sentence fits in, since QM is highly mathematical and scientific.
Zherka possesses an eccentric knowledge and curiosity. It’s always refreshing to learn these types of things about curious individuals. Unfortunately, I find that most people are “matrix” like in their behavior and are therefore extremely low in curiosity and the subsequent knowledge.
Einstein's god is not Jung's God . Einstein believed in Espinoza's god, which happens to be the same as satan's god . The nature itself personified as god .
على ما أظن يجب ترتيب الاولويات في التفكير، وأظن اول ما ستخرج به هو التفكير بالحقائق ثم تبدأ بغربلة الحقائق سواء كانت الدينية، العلمية،الفلسفية الخ.. تبتعد عن التحيز (الفِتَن) وتُعطي من جُهدك ووقتِك بعدل في البحث في كل منها أما إذا أردت نصيحتي وخبرتي المتواضعة (فمختصر الطريق ان الحقيقة لن تجدها الا بالدين) واذا أردت رأيي مرة أخرى فلن تجد الحقيقة الا في (الإسلام) ونعم قد مررت بتجربة غنية من التخبطات سواء بالالحاد او بالتدين او والعلم عند اللَّه بما هو أعمق من ذلك فاختصار الطريق واتباع الاسلام كان دائما افضل حل وجواب فالحَمدُ للَّه إذا أصبت، وأستَغفر اللَّه إذا أخطأت
I think that priorities must be arranged in thinking, and I think that the first thing you will come up with is thinking about the facts Then you start sifting through the facts, whatever they are Religious, scientific, philosophical, etc. Stay away from bias (temptation) You give your effort and time fairly in researching each of them But if you want my advice and my humble experience (the short road is that you will not find the truth except through religion) If you want my opinion again, you will only find the truth in (Islam). And yes, I have been through a rich experience of confusion, whether with atheism, religiosity, or with something deeper than that.واللَّه أعلم Shortening the path and following Islam has always been the best solution and answer Praise be to اللَّه if I am right, and I seek forgiveness from اللَّه if I am wrong سبحان اللَّه وبِحَمدِه سُبْحَان اللَّه العَظِيم.
I think the english speaking audiance might have missunderstood dr jung here. I as a native german speaker think he is referring to himself (jung), as not beeing welcome to the discussion, cause einstein had his fixed ideas. Dr jung kinda uses english words with german sentence construction and pronounciation ^^
That makes sense, thanks for sharing.
Your explanation makes sense.
Agree
@@humannature698 change the caption then
@@ayushanand6718 if I could edit the video, I'ld do it but, I'ld have to reupload again so Idk about it
He’s saying it was impossible to get inside Einstein a mind because he was so absorbed in his own ideas
jung is saying einstein had no interest in jung's ideas because einstein had ideas of his own
@@jgunther3398 I bet Einstein tried to get into Jung’s mine just the same, with the same luck.
Thanks
your welcome
@@WOWlowLifeDoj
@@bencarr8809 pssss they are about carbon reduce us
dude, stop turning nuanced philosophical discussions into meaningless sensationalist clickbait shorts
You seem like a sour person
Exactly
His thumbnail sums it up. 😅
Dont watch it, one view less, you did your part on helping in stopping these videos. You chose your reality to some extent, you cannot change everything around you. Simply put, if you dont like it, dont watch it, it is that easy.
🤓🤓🤓🤓
He said "so concentrated" not "so unconcentrated". Captions are wrong.
Captions are always wrong in shorts.
now it makes sense thx
I heard the same
Captions always lie these days. It's a plague
Yes.
You are misrepresenting what Jung is saying here.
Yes, he's thinking something completely else
"So concentrated" he says
😂
I understand what he said clearly.. if your study was not mathematically documented along with the evidence Dr enstine lacked enthusiasm for the subject.
I understood wht u said; not what he said. Maybe language issue.
Oh I see. Einstein would only take Jung seriously if he backed up his ideas with numbers, equations etc
So then Einstein was hard to assess bc of this
...
@@edwarda5584 that's almost impossible in a psyche study, except in material/empirical stuff, where the variables aren't even clear and the laws don't seem to be very firm
@@bezbezzebbyson788The big questions asked by classical psychologists have evolved into matters other scientists can address. Classical psychology was never able to pay off William James' wish that "...by treating Psychology like a natural science, to help her to become one."
JUNG AND ALBERT HAD BEEF JUNG WAS FROM THE EASTSIDE BLOODS AND ALBERT WAS A WESTSIDE CRIP . LIFE IS MORE STRANGER THAN IT SEEMS
Lost how many brain cells trying to read this.
Jung and Einstein had their reasons. It was among the German-Swiss Faction. Real greaseball $hit. If you know, you know.
@@dreamingdreamerdreamshut up 304
@@dreamingdreamerdreamif you can’t accept the truth, then you’re not needed here.
@@childpeanut5095 Wow, scary
So concentrated.... Not unconcentrated
True if I listen to it without watching it, he clearly says concentrateted
@@alejandrohauser3165 like a detective...searching for truth by finding and taking complementary hints . Very clever 😊
@@alejandrohauser3165are u german ??
All he said was Einstein was not interested in Jungs field of study
There was no room for Einstein to digest and discuss Jung’s profound ideas because Einstein was entrenched with his own ideas
Nah. He was entrenched in stealing other people's ideas.
I love how he profoundly describes historical characters as the humans that they are through his interactions with them.
Ha ha. He’s just saying what he thinks about a contemporary of his.
Relax
PLUS he didn't say unconcentrated, he said concentrated
Unless we are able to hear their original discussion, we have no way of judging for ourselves. Einstein could have easily said: in relativity we are looking at physical realities-but humane phycology is a mingling of concepts.
He doesn't roast Einstein, he simply explains why the conversation didn't focus on the links in their theories
I just thought of two things: one is Einstein is too busy to entertain other thoughts, second is Jung might have been rejected.
What was the roast? Seems like Jung said Einstein wasn't open to different perspective that Jung would propose.
Yes. He's calling Einstein arrogant, and he's correct. They're both geniuses, but Einstein lacked the wisdom to see other's intellectual value.
@thesurvivorssanctuary6561 Einstein wasn't open to God. Just like when the Catholic Priest who developed the Big Bang theory pointed out Einstein was saying there is a high probability that God exists. Einstein went back and tried changing his work but saw there was no way to do it.
Understand when I say God, I don't mean the superstitious sky daddy. I mean the Infinite Consciousness that everything flows from. As Jung said I KNOW God exists and the math is even starting to say it.
I think it's that Einstein was a man of reason, and Jung wasn't, so Einstein wasn't interested in discussing Jung's crackpot ideas, and Jung is trying to put it down to Einstein's lack of openness.
@omp199 that's understandable. Some of jungs ideas are very out there.
@@javiersoto5223 Like which ones are out there? I'm curious. 🙂
"The maths shows that human observation cannot be trusted when in pursuit of empirical truth" - a conclusion I would imagine from their dialogue.
This applies to gambling.
It's not logic, it's maths.
It's odds.
Not roasting, just speaking facts. When you are highly specialized, there’s no room for multidisciplinary thought. That’s not a negative it is by necessity a byproduct of specialization.
At that time multi discipline thinking was not yet the case, I think, more 'closed' concepts, no internet yet... Wich takes ideas fast forward, and mixed medea
@@jankehaga8735All science disciplines were created from one - Philosophy. So no, multi discipline is an old concept actually. Which got a new developer in modern era.
@@atius8571 what filosofy?
@@atius8571 yes oké in the beginning of 'science' I can understand the world was more seen as a whole, mythic experienced, I don't exactly know when 'scientific' thinking started
Basically, when all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
He didn't say he tried, more that he didn't bother
They transcribed the words wrong. He is basically saying Einstein has so much physics and maths to think about that he doesn't have much time to discuss psychological things with Jung
I think it would be a good idea to correct the subtitles. They are exactly wrong.
I think that he was saying that Einstein cannot focus on anything outside of his ideas, his fields. Not welcome into his mind. ?
I frequently found Maths teachers to be a little different.
Thanks Dr Jung for explaining. 😂
This is so relatable when you are educated in psychology and talk to someone who is having non of it. Your perspective is simply not welcome.
Albert was in his box.
So i would have to ask more questions would it be similar to hexagonal (locked position )depression (or a, b-x, y magnetism ) when you refer to e= mc²/ e=mc²= current condition at scale idk
This is the real reason this world stuck with the current consciousness we have. We put science as the ONLY thing to believe, to be an “ mainstream”. Yes science has done so many great things for humanity, and we need it to continue working for humanity. But many quantum mechanics can’t calculate or explain because this area’s actually indeed is only can explained by the existence of spirit in the universe. We all part of it, and the scientists put this part away like we made by just some kind of data, not matter.
I think he noticed that Einstein took being concentrated on his own work and being a mathematician on top of that as a compliment so he roasted Einstein by saying "your not welcome"
"Hes so concentrated, not (unconcentrated as the script reads) editoria error, please fix.🤔
To be fair to Einstein here, there couldn't be a bigger philosophical gap between these two. A committed scientist can't really engage in the idea of the unconscious, especially in the way Jung conceived it.
Jung’s conception of the unconscious is distinctly not Freudian.
Freud's conception of the unconscious focuses on repressed personal experiences, desires, and traumatic memories, primarily driven by sexual and aggressive instincts. Jung, on the other hand, expands the unconscious to include both the personal unconscious and the collective unconscious, which contains universal archetypes and symbols shared across humanity. Freud's approach emphasizes resolving repressed conflicts through psychoanalysis, whereas Jung's approach emphasizes achieving individuation by integrating both personal and collective unconscious elements. Thus, Freud's view is more individually centered, while Jung's incorporates a broader, more universal perspective.
@@quentinkumba6746 Thank you for the correction (will edit my comment). My point was the general idea of the unconscious as a "thing" was derived from Freud I think.
@@learnnowspeaknow - yes, and my criticism was a bit overdone because Jung began with Freud’s ideas as a base from which to depart.
Ultimately Jung takes a view of the unconscious and especially of archetypes as being structural principles of the universeitself.
Jung worked with Wolfgang Pauli the quantum physicist to try and explain mathematics and physics in terms of archetypes.
This leads him along long way away from Freud but he starts with Freud.
@@quentinkumba6746Thats right.Jung had a more encompassing view of the human mind AND the human condition....and a loftier one,as well !!....❤😊...
The caption is unnecessarily sensational & not accurate. This wasnt a roast, merely a fact as Jung viewed it, that their ways of thinking didn’t mesh - that Jung’s view was basically unwelcome to Einstein.
Thats precisely what I was thinking as well.😊 And Einstein probably meant that psychological theories and ways of thinking ARE relative and subjective ( which they are )....depending on subjective assessments...as opposed to a scientists view of the natural world ( which is more absolute ...and definable more stringently ).
They both had their World Views and life perspectives built around the occult and the mystery religions..
Where is the occult and the mystery religions here....?
Einstein's son, Eduard Einstein, was a big fan of Psychoanalysis, especially Freud. He even wrote some interesting things about his father's psyche. But more interesting is what Albert Einstein thought about psychoanalysis:
“It may not always be helpful to delve into the subconscious,” he once said. “Our legs are controlled by a hundred different muscles. Do you think it would help us to walk if we analyzed our legs and knew the exact purpose of each muscle and the order in which they work?”
Source: Isaacson, 2007
he said Einstein was "concentrated" not "unconcentrated". Captions are wrong
Highly, HIGHLY recommend Jung’s book - ‘Modern Man In Search of a Soul’. The wisdom he provides is invaluable, and our world is in dire need of such wisdom. Now more than ever
Teaching in a university in the Third Reich and still have the courages Ego against those who tried to stop the cancer called nazism, this is something I’m amazed.
Agent 488. Let me know what you find
What he's saying is that Albert Einstein told him that he was not welcome to Einstein's Theory of Relativity because Einstein was arrogantly could not care less about any nonmaterial topic such as evolutionary psychology.
This is so misleading. Jung is saying that no one could understand Einstein because he is an introverted thinker. Anyone could hardly understand what Einstein thinks so it would be hard to convince him otherwise because his knowledge is fixed and reasonable. It would take much to convince him to an idea.
Not a roast but a compliment from a psychoanalytical way.
Not quite. Jung is actually saying Einstein is incapable of listening to other's intellectual ideas. It fits Einstein's history, and REALLY shows off how unbearable a husband he must've been with his wife.
@@thesurvivorssanctuary6561I agree. Its the typical arrogance of the natural scientist,who thinks he has the key to everything in the universe...!! Even if its a great mind like Einstein......
Wrong subs … “when a man is so concentrated on his own idea “ meaning when he’s stuck in his own box he knows everything in that box and won’t allow it to open cause he’s holding onto what fits his narrative. There is no way for new ideas to come into that box because It threatens the very existence of that box itself . No one wants those beliefs to fly out since we worked so hard to identify ourselves with them
When two demigods are discussing the cameraman should not interfere 😂😂
HEAVY ROAST. ALBERT MIGHT AS WELL BE A THANKSGIVING TURKEY. BOOM.
lmfao
Well shieeet
Einestien might be right.. i feel like it could apply to himan psyche.. when u have a major cosmic law like that it usually applies to so many aspects.. especially that human psyche develops above & below certain rules or levels.. some are more advanced than others..
relativity isn't a law, it's a compilation of descriptions of reality. It's not the same thing.
Thermodynamics? Those are laws. In a closed system, energy cannot be destroyed or created, only transformed. This can apply to other fields such as economics or sociology, because it's a universal law, but relativity isn't like thermodynamics.
Einstein as Asperger’s. He bounds to keep himself to himself.
^
Very typical of the scientific mind as well....
the problem with Einstein and scientists like that is that they think everything is set in stone and they are the smartest, also the same is feud between Jung and Froyd, I can say Jung was a thinker and Froyd just like a boy who does not really understand science but plays along like he does....
You are not welcome means relativity is not the only perspective. einstein missed the other view by not accomodating any new ideas. I never liked the concept of relativity by einstein. Chris Nolan made a film on a flawed concept.
@@kingcrimson3882 Yes dear. you need to have the capacity to absorb new information.
@@ekulda to me it is enough that luke never liked it
@@ekulda no joke
Can point me to a video or explain the main reason why it’s flawed
@@tizoc4999 foundations are flawed. for any research question, we seek to frst understand by defining. So Define water - A substance in 3 states, sorry now 4 states... etc and so on and so forth.
1. Definition.
A definition is arrived at only after the theory is understood.
Define Gravity?
Current definition is flawed.
Define relativity?
That is flawed.
Define Time?
So when you take flawed definitions for research, the conclusion and foundations are all wrong. The outcomes will be wrong :/. Carl Jung would have added a perspective. Sadly einstein lost the opportunity to learn, his ego got the better of him. Study INDIA's ancient texts you will get some perspective. The indigenous - after years of observation got astronomy and what not. Stay humble to learn. or like einstein... Oy Vey ! is all we have for him.
Dark matter is Ether that keeps all orbital mass and trajectory in its set destination. But who will listen. ether controls what happens. the Divine void or Divine Darkness' hands are Ether is. Divine design, discover it.
Its not relative. Its the same static all over the multiverse, omni verses. It does not change. Slow and fast you may say vary. But for the observer only, Subjectively. Not objectively.
All is flawed because the people who set the alphabet on science wanted us to be in the dark (No Knowlegde) But knowledge is truth and that always surfaces. Universal truths.
rest i leave to your discovery.
ruclips.net/video/aUtdLfdnpzs/видео.html
BBC did an article. But its vague too :) Let those who seek, find. All the best. Its not going to change your life's trajectory. Still, Discover.
@@tizoc4999 I don't know what precisely OP is talking about, but the two issues I can think about are:
- It's incomensurate with QM
- Mach's principle
I don't really know how relativity pertains to psychic function. The question seems underspecified; are we saying that somehow psychic function is significantly affected by gravity, or that there is a (specious) relativity associated with psychic function?
So Jung couldn’t talk to Einstein because he didn’t believe in Einsteins capacity to have an open mind? That sounds to me like Jung was the one with a closed mind.
We don't have free will but we have conciousness and knowledge, and that knowledge will help us to work well in this world .The knowledge is responsibility for functioning of society .The fact is here who is providing knowledge and what we type of knowledge considering that we human not perfect being
Einstein’s quantum ghost! He did not believe in after life, he was a mathematician … Jung did believe… “peculiar faculties of the psyche not confined to time/space. Two opposite men!
So he's answering the question by saying Einstein didn't let me into his mind.
Well then, keep your secrets Einstein 😂
Not a roast, but a toast!
No roast here. Jung just said he couldn't really discuss with Einstein because he was too concentrated on his work.
Hey check this from Jung talking about Einstein....he nailed it in so many ways 😂😂
The man was comprimised like Einstein
A philosopher and a physics professor in one room is nothing but disaster.
As the hood Wittgenstein once said:
“There are mathematical problems, biological problems, but philosophy does not have real problems.”
He said *concentrated* . Not unconcentrated.
Einstein married his first cousin Elsa. Hahahahah! Sooooo smart
Was waiting for the silly sigma song to fade in 🤣 this isn't a roast it's a compliment
Jung was basically calling Einstein arrogant, and unable to listen to others. If true, then it's no wonder his wife was okay with his divorcing her. He sounds unbearable to a fellow intellectual who doesn't initially pique his curiosity.
It's neutral.
Good thing I read the comments
😂you are not welcome
Basically Einstein was a table, its purpose in life is to have items placed on it everything else is irrelevant, where as others are a bicycle its only function is to traverse distances, anything else is irrelevant , i think all academics in their respected fields are like this
Jung clearly knew the value of being concentrated - think Sabina Spielrein, and how she was treated.
You make it sound like a true roast lol. He’s just criticizing him a little. Loll. Very nice very nice.
Not really a surprising disconnect. Einstein had an incisive mind focused on the logical implications of facts and mathematical inferences. Jung's mind searched for patterns in the fuzzy manifestations of subconscious mental process. It's like trying to find common ground for conversation between an Eskimo and a professional basketball player. Different worlds!
"roasts"
I don't think this word applies here.
He's a physicist, not a mainly mathematician?
Get your captions right.
Thats not a roast, an assessment, could even be interpreted as a compliment in fact.
I would imagine a person buried in numbers would have a very hard time talking about the abstract. We all know the spooky quantum story...he couldn't find his way around that.
🔥 What an Honour!
Jung just goes there. Love him
Basically Carl Jung said he is not a Physicist nor a Mathematician, so applying relativity to psyche is beyond his scope. Thus, I never see someone apply relativity to Psychology..?
The fabric of spacetime is affected by the gravity of our thougts..into the present
Can we change the past..
Yes..
When we change the future with our thoughts ..the future then writes its past as the present ..
Theory of .real.ativity
U see the signal of that in synchromysticity talked about by carl jung..
Here is an example :
People wakiing up to the debt matrix that has hijacked the debt matrix
Utube : occult law of commerce jason whitney
And the solution to the problem .mits abject representation is read by the creatives and potrayed in abstract form in trailers ..via words and pictures
Utube : current war trailer
Our subconscious is like the worm hole feeding energy .and info from the collective subconscious into the balck hole which is future spacetime...
But when the individual wakes up to the subconscious collective programming if the debt matrix then we can individuallu affect the future or talk to it..and interact with it ..the proof of that is the clues and sunchromysitic events it uses to talk to us via sights and symbols and words...becuase we gave changed the future ...
Theory of relativity can be used as an analogy as to how the waking cinscious is tied to the subconscious and its feedback to and from the superconsciousness .
.black hole sun ..
Study the debt matrix to get out of it ..and then u see ..especially in trailers how the future talks to u ...and introduces and informs its presence ..in abstract from from the creatives who unknowingly tap into that superconscious fabric..
They use sumbols like black madonna..Mother ..Sea ..
Etc...
U only see what your eyes want to see..
If u want to see the Sea, the Sea will show itself to u
Utube : madonna frozen
Its such a weird thing that people act like Einstein was thw smartest man on Earth
It was Jung actually :>
Well some people are very smart in one area while clueless in another this apply also to Einstein as well as to Jung. And the clip here showcase that fact very well.
And many more. We just happens to put scientific intelligence as the superior kind.
There's no smartmest man. Since you cant be the best at everything.
They were good at their fields.
@@nehamotwani6477it has been the best tool to solving the world's problem.
@@andrewfrancis1424 only in one way though.
the woman sees inside Dr Peterson's mind
He isn’t roasting Einstein, stop with the clickbait nonsense!
As a native spanish speaker, i got the same meaning you are explaining.
Theories of mind ride the coattails of theoretical physics. Here they talk about how relativity might affect the mind in much the same way that philosophy of the mind today has latched onto quantum mechanics.
jung also couldn't understand math in grade school. it just never clicked for him, so he likely wasn't able to follow with einsteins ideas. both specialized in different things. on jung;s side, it likely wasn't a 'roast', just an observation that he acknowledged as subjective
There’s no reason to call this a roast.. he’s a psychologist he’s doing what he does-that is, making observations of and speaking about human nature. Please try to avoid commodifying genuine intellectuals who offer truly liberating knowledge, as soon as something is commodified it becomes obsolete.
Ah yes in other words we get in our own way and in order to experience the miracle of Life we often need help smashing the Self Will to allow such a drastic paradigm shift.
Maybe Einstein is just interested only in the physical world.
I feel like cacophobia - prejudice against unnattractive people - is a severely underexplored issue, particularly with how it intersects with things like queerphobia and ableism.
Average sigma male
Easiest way to spot a moron is if they use this term.
"Get on Einstein's level or GTFO"
Jung was no lightweight in his field.
We could state the same about Jung. There’s no such thing as Einstein or Jung in their fields, to this day.
Einstein and Freud would’ve probably had a better relationship overall, due to their innate stubbornness.
The level of a sold clown . He was lying about relativity and he knew it perfectly well .
@@cristig243 how so?
Einstein had no time for metaphysics
I think that depends on what you mean by metaphysics. Considering he objected to quantum non-locality based on the "reality" principle, I'd think that would count on some definitions.
@@ericm9495Einstein was primarily a theoretical physicist and areas like psychology/study of consciouness (especially the Jungian) and spirituality, in general, cross over deeply to what can be termed as metaphysics. That's why he argued to the bitter end agains quantum physics because he thought "God doesn't play dice with the universe." In his mind, probably, anything that cannot be explained /reduced to some neat mathematical equation cannot be true science.
@@socialjunkster
But the term "Metaphysics" doesn't just mean "study of the supernatural/spiritual". It's used in philosophy to mean, among other things, the study of reality as it really is, independent of our perceptions. So my point is that by that definition, his objections to QM were on metaphyiscal grounds. As are his objections to QM that he based on his commitment to determinism.
There are people, like the logical positivists, who scoff at metaphysics as "the study of reality independent of perceptions" just as there are people who scoff at "the study of the supernatural". So I just thought your original comment needed clarification.
I'm also not sure where your last sentence fits in, since QM is highly mathematical and scientific.
Yeah, metaphysics just means the object of study isnt physical.
Like, the study of ideas are already metaphysical.
Not true. Einstein read Shopenhauer
Zherka possesses an eccentric knowledge and curiosity. It’s always refreshing to learn these types of things about curious individuals. Unfortunately, I find that most people are “matrix” like in their behavior and are therefore extremely low in curiosity and the subsequent knowledge.
Zherka? 🤔
He had adhd and was hyperfocused on math and physics, for a psychological idol you sure weren't that astute 😊
Of course relativity is connected to the psychic function. Our science is a reflection of a mental disconnect from true nervous functions.
Einstein's god is not Jung's God . Einstein believed in Espinoza's god, which happens to be the same as satan's god . The nature itself personified as god .
So concentrated
He said concentrated not unconcentrated!
He didn’t roast him. It’s called an opinion and diff views on life. We need to allow for this again.
على ما أظن يجب ترتيب الاولويات في التفكير، وأظن اول ما ستخرج به هو التفكير بالحقائق
ثم تبدأ بغربلة الحقائق سواء كانت
الدينية، العلمية،الفلسفية الخ..
تبتعد عن التحيز (الفِتَن)
وتُعطي من جُهدك ووقتِك بعدل في البحث في كل منها
أما إذا أردت نصيحتي وخبرتي المتواضعة (فمختصر الطريق ان الحقيقة لن تجدها الا بالدين)
واذا أردت رأيي مرة أخرى فلن تجد الحقيقة الا في (الإسلام)
ونعم قد مررت بتجربة غنية من التخبطات سواء بالالحاد او بالتدين او والعلم عند اللَّه بما هو أعمق من ذلك
فاختصار الطريق واتباع الاسلام كان دائما افضل حل وجواب
فالحَمدُ للَّه إذا أصبت، وأستَغفر اللَّه إذا أخطأت
I think that priorities must be arranged in thinking, and I think that the first thing you will come up with is thinking about the facts Then you start sifting through the facts, whatever they are Religious, scientific, philosophical, etc. Stay away from bias (temptation) You give your effort and time fairly in researching each of them But if you want my advice and my humble experience (the short road is that you will not find the truth except through religion) If you want my opinion again, you will only find the truth in (Islam). And yes, I have been through a rich experience of confusion, whether with atheism, religiosity, or with something deeper than that.واللَّه أعلم Shortening the path and following Islam has always been the best solution and answer Praise be to اللَّه if I am right, and I seek forgiveness from اللَّه if I am wrong
سبحان اللَّه وبِحَمدِه سُبْحَان اللَّه العَظِيم.
Ya, a physicist doesn’t really need to talk to a BS artist...
Totally fair and I understand noth parties here. Shameless clickbait
This wasn’t a roast
Funny cuz enstien and jung have the same mbti personality type intp
he has that Arnold accent
Clickbait title. Shameful