Yes that track design is just better, if not more complicated and likely to create problems. Also being adjustable on the fly? Pretty ingenious for a tractor made in Fargo ND, where I’m writing from. Also, you can get a premium interior in the New Holland as was shown in the Case. A bit unfair in comparison there. And the seats are a small part of it, the layout in the New Holland much more intuitive. But it’s newer so expected
Red one wins Just had both on trial Theyre both identical except for the tracks, cab and hydraulic remotes New holland track system is junk, it can't get power to the ground, it power hops to a stop at 80% engine load plus its top speed is only 28 so putting it on a grain cart is not an option The new hollamd is just a wheeled tractor with track units bolted on not a dedicated track machine designed from.the ground up to function properly Theres no reason you can't just buy the cheaper wheeled new holland then buy the track units separate and.slot them on because they're not a cnh product they're made by a separate supplier The new holland has a better cab in my opinion, I domt like the leather seat amd the new holland layout makes it easier to run cables for all your implement monitors But the comport is identical because the cab frame is the same amd the seat frame is the same But its a case we ended up buying It just performs world's ahead in every operation
@@MonsterTracksStudios you answered your own question. PTO HP. It didn’t matter when I was a kid on our big 4wds, but now with giant grain carts and air seeders perhaps it does. I’d be curious to know how much HP each uses on their track system? Fuel usage difference. I’m old so I’d rather have some LSW tires. Having worked on actual CAT dozer undercarriages I can tell you once the warranty is gone, you don’t want either of these. But I suppose most farmers don’t fix their own stuff anymore. Just a fact of life when I was a kid farming with my dad. Tires reduce fuel loss and are a days work to replace, even though spin can be a factor, the difference in compaction is over blown and tracks are more trouble than they’re worth. You’ll see, 15 years from now people will scrap these rather than rebuild and replace tracks. See how simple Claas designs there’s? That’s how it’s done.
El New holland t9 tiene 700 HP y el rojo 620Hp el azul gana y otra cosa porque. Tienen el mismo diseño ya la case pierde tradición otra empresa le copió el diseño a la case a donde ven a la Jhon deere copia de tractores por eso es única en el mundo y es la n1
Or New Holland build the Case. The NH track design is superior, as is the interior layout, despite this video showing the Case with optional Premium interior. I like the color blue better than red so I’m NH. The whole lineup that NH has put up rivals any other. The T8.435 is impressive, but not up to the Fendt 1050, but the NH doesn’t carry near that price either. Fendt makes the most impressive tractors I have seen in the 1050, it’s a regular tractor that’s been scaled up by 1/3. Nuts
Engine peak torque : 2.941 Nm (both)
Given that they're essentially twins, I'm gonna go with the eyeball test: the blue tractor wins.
NH for the W! Plus it's tracks have a more interesting design
It's the same engine, but the T9 is quite better desingend especially the large tracks
Yes that track design is just better, if not more complicated and likely to create problems. Also being adjustable on the fly? Pretty ingenious for a tractor made in Fargo ND, where I’m writing from. Also, you can get a premium interior in the New Holland as was shown in the Case. A bit unfair in comparison there. And the seats are a small part of it, the layout in the New Holland much more intuitive. But it’s newer so expected
Christopher Alton Carlson ingenious for a tractor made in Fargo? Implying that Steiger hasn’t always been great?
Red one wins
Just had both on trial
Theyre both identical except for the tracks, cab and hydraulic remotes
New holland track system is junk, it can't get power to the ground, it power hops to a stop at 80% engine load plus its top speed is only 28 so putting it on a grain cart is not an option
The new hollamd is just a wheeled tractor with track units bolted on not a dedicated track machine designed from.the ground up to function properly
Theres no reason you can't just buy the cheaper wheeled new holland then buy the track units separate and.slot them on because they're not a cnh product they're made by a separate supplier
The new holland has a better cab in my opinion, I domt like the leather seat amd the new holland layout makes it easier to run cables for all your implement monitors
But the comport is identical because the cab frame is the same amd the seat frame is the same
But its a case we ended up buying
It just performs world's ahead in every operation
👍👍👍👍👍
T9 700: 629 CV (620 Hp) Max 691 CV (682 Hp)
Steiger 620: 629 CV (620 Hp) Max 691 CV (682 Hp)
Só para corrigir!
Red for sure! Try cleaning mud and dirt out of them solid bogeys on new Holland! Case has spoked bogeys that make cleaning and maintenance easy!
I'd choose the red one
is the new holland built in fargo as well?
As far as i know Case IH and New Holland the same thing owned technology by Iveco and owned by CHN Industrial.
That was the point of the video and question.
Holland is best tractor 🚜
bizim tt55 o caseyi çeker mk
they are twins. be cause using same engine technology.....
If it's Red... leave it in the shed. :)
If its blue leave it there dude
@@christophermarlar4595 not as good
Doesn’t rime
New Hollaaand 💪💪💪
I chose new holland t9700
I think T9 700 is the best he have much pto power and other things than case
Yes, nh is better when the gearshift and front and rear differential lock go to shit at 500 operating hours.
what is the difference of PTO power??
@@MonsterTracksStudios you answered your own question. PTO HP. It didn’t matter when I was a kid on our big 4wds, but now with giant grain carts and air seeders perhaps it does. I’d be curious to know how much HP each uses on their track system? Fuel usage difference. I’m old so I’d rather have some LSW tires. Having worked on actual CAT dozer undercarriages I can tell you once the warranty is gone, you don’t want either of these. But I suppose most farmers don’t fix their own stuff anymore. Just a fact of life when I was a kid farming with my dad. Tires reduce fuel loss and are a days work to replace, even though spin can be a factor, the difference in compaction is over blown and tracks are more trouble than they’re worth. You’ll see, 15 years from now people will scrap these rather than rebuild and replace tracks. See how simple Claas designs there’s? That’s how it’s done.
tt55 al en iyisi
case çöp
Case 💪
Claro da New Holland
Məcə bular iki qardadlar HOLLAD VƏ CANSEL
El New holland t9 tiene 700 HP y el rojo 620Hp el azul gana y otra cosa porque. Tienen el mismo diseño ya la case pierde tradición otra empresa le copió el diseño a la case a donde ven a la Jhon deere copia de tractores por eso es única en el mundo y es la n1
Case 💪 new Holland 🦾
New Holland vs xmaxx 😂😂😂😂
New Holland............
Same company, like Buick vs GM, I used to design for them. What a mess
That was the point of the video and question.
Their the exact same tractor because case ih build new Holland’s large tractors
Or New Holland build the Case. The NH track design is superior, as is the interior layout, despite this video showing the Case with optional Premium interior. I like the color blue better than red so I’m NH. The whole lineup that NH has put up rivals any other. The T8.435 is impressive, but not up to the Fendt 1050, but the NH doesn’t carry near that price either. Fendt makes the most impressive tractors I have seen in the 1050, it’s a regular tractor that’s been scaled up by 1/3. Nuts
Case build the NH because Case has made the Quadtrac long before they merged together.
NH KRALLLLLLLLLLLLLL
Draw