Even with the source being unknown. And the manuscript is authentic. There is a tradition of writing the Quran as a means to aid in memorization and familiarization. It’s perfectly logical that the writer was writing off of memory, like a child, and brought it to his teacher and his teacher corrected the mistakes and wrote the overlying text
@@hk8450 no, it’s Arabic, the researchers founded different textes erased from the manuscript. The non Muslims islamophobes say the Quran was changed and thus Islam is false while in reality it was just a child learning manuscript that obviously was corrected.
@@z0rO999 you have been born into islam, and there is not much hope convincing you otherwise, as your mind operates outside of logic now. All I can say is, don't hate on non muslims. People are not islamophobe if they don't like the religion of islam, they are islamophobes if they hate muslim people. As for the quran being altered. It wasn't compiled until 650, there is no proof it wasn't unaltered before. And the 3rd caliph ordered that different versions were burned, indicating there were alternative versions circulating. However, even if the quran was perfectly preserved, it is still a flawed book, it advocates for violence, it contains contradictions, among many other problems.
I know right? We still do that today to learn it's obviously a student copy and we are humans we make mistakes sometimes in printing writing etc although rare but it happens and the Qur'an is preserved by memorization not written
The Christians and Jews are annoyed that their own scriptures have changed over time, so they begin pointing fingers at Muslims in desperation. Despite them wanting to change the Words of Allah, the Quran will remain preserved until the end of time. Allah says, "Verily, We, it is We Who have sent down the Dhikr (i.e. the Qur’ân) and surely, We will preserve it" (Al-Hijr:9).
They’re bitter dead Enders coz their own congregation is leaving by their millions, they think false stories posted online will change our hearts??? The same lies they post about China 🇨🇳
@eckhardtkiwitt8602 The Quran was originally a recitation that was memorized, not a book written by humans. Humans who memorized the Quran came together and then wrote it down.
@@Eckhardt-Kiwitt_QS72 that is literally because nobody else can say it. why would Muhammad pbuh say that when he himself knows he is just narrating for people to write down the message.
Thank you. I think that’s the biggest proof, i didn’t think like that maybe i didn’t understood till i saw your comment, i went back and watched the part again. Thank you
BECAUSE SHAHBA REFUSE THE QURAN OF ALI THE MIGHTY AND ZAID BIN SABIT 1ST OF KHIZRIG TRIBE WHO ACCEPTED ABU BAKAR THE CALIPH WAS MADE RESPONSIBLE TO GATHER THE QURAN NOT THE AHLEBAIT
as a middle school teacher i'm really impressed with your way of elaborating, simplifying and organising topics, so i must say I'm learning two stuff here haha. may Allah reward you and all of us with his heavens
You can’t be serious. A Parchment is not the type of material where you mess around on. Especially when it comes to learning. Its use, given its cost and limited availability was only for the most important tasks done by the most reputable and educated people in a community. This may shock you, but it’s not some form of chalk board. There are plenty of early manuscripts wherein some mistakes were made by copyists that were subsequently corrected (sometimes even by the same scribe). That's not what is happening here. The entire structure and skeleton of this manuscripts does not follow the standardized Uthman rasm (consonantal skeleton). Completely desperate having to make a 12 minute video full of excuses in a false attempt to deny the truth 😂😂😂
I remember there was an atheist teacher in our school going around and telling highschoolers lies about this. How I wish I had the information at that time. Thank you for all the research, may Allah bless you. To everyone here, check on your kids, know about their friends and teachers, make sure to keep the doors of communication open between yourselves. And seek knowledge and then educate them regarding the deen, there are people there trying to lead them astray.
Turkey has an abnormally large number of atheists. I feel bad for parents who had to suffer like you did because of that teacher and others like him. I've seen teachers like that and we were able to shut them down with evidence.
Knowledge is power. If you had said that the Topkapi Palace had the handwritten Quran of Hazrat Osman and that the digital text had been checked by atheists many times and they could not find any difference, you would have silenced him. But as you said, they first kept people ignorant and then alienated them from Islam with their own lies.
In Morocco, the traditional method of memorizing the Qur’an in mosques is by writing verses on wooden boards by the students, reviewing them with the teacher, then washing the boards and repeating the process over and over again.
We had the same here in Pakistan, its called ( Takh'ti ) ....now ofcrs things have changed but still you can find children using them in village schools
That's how I studied, we coat the boards with mud made of a special light grey clay, let them dry, then write on them with a hand made ink and pen, when we want to erase them we wash them off clean with water, the mud dissolve taking the ink with it.
We did the same in Pakistan. As soon as he said there was mistakes, I knew it was a kid trying to practice writing the verses on a washable paper. And it got corrected by the teacher or he did it himself by notating something in the very line he made a mistake.
I've honestly heard of this manuscript before and never gave it that much attention as much as some attackers did since it was after all..."erased", there could've been many possibilities. However, I'll admit that your work was more than EXCELLENT with incredible research and I really wish more people would watch this video, it is indeed an important one as you said it is. May Allah bless you.
@@adriankoh4859 yeah its not like qurans fall from the sky as the brother mentions in the video. Nice try but the quran was revealed in audio form, as Prophet Mohammad (s.a.w) was illiterate. did you even watch the video?
1- Just a minor point: The cover screen says Old Quran and Quran. Better type: Old Mushaf and mushaf. These written copies are called Mushaf (s) and Masahif (p}. 2- Behnam paper which I see at minute 3: 29: I read it and it is actually a great paper refuting some so called academic work attacking Sanaa' manuscripts Thanks
My friend, I have TWO different Arabic versions of the quran right here at home. So I hold the evidence that there are more than one version of the quran. You have been lied to my friend. But please my friend, do NOT believe me. Go and buy a hafs quran and a warsh quran (they are the most popular) in ARABIC and compare them. You do not even need to know much Arabic to easily see the many differences in MEANING between just these two versions of the quran. So will you accept my challenge and buy these two qurans or will you keep on believing the islamic fairy tale of the one perfectly preserved quran my friend? And both these versions of the quran are full of mistakes and contradictions as well as approving of evil such as raping women captured in battle (surah 33:50) and wife beating (surah 4:34) and child marriage (surah 65:4) which means that Mohammed and his allah approved of raping little prepubescent girls (those who have not menstruated) which is pure evil. And Mohammed led by example when he married a 6 old child and then had sex with that child when it was just 9 years old. Sex with children is always rape as a child cannot consent to something they cannot fully understand, which makes sex with children evil and disgusting. That means Mohammed was an evil child rapist and disgusting pervert which makes him a false prophet. Nobody needs the Sana'a manuscripts to know that the quran has been corrupted
Something else that proves the preservation of the Quran is how it is recited the same around the world. From China, Dagestan all the way to South Africa.
@@TheJiminiflix There are about 77000 words in the Quran. So you are telling me there is a difference in each word there is a variant to other Qurans.
@@ToHimWeWillBeReturnedyour confusing the 7 recitations of the Qur'an, The 7 recitations or mode of reading Were sent all to Muhammed their purposes were to make the arab tribes memorise and preach the Qur'an in a more easier by their own dialect The difference between those recitations is by pronunciation , pronouns The other changes won't change the meaning but it will deepen the meaning of the Ayat Like for example: Fig 1: Those who were killed for the sake of Allah,Allah will not make their work go to waste Fig.2: those who fought for the sake of Allah,Allah will not make their work go to waste Those 2 figures deepens the meaning of the Aya,by saying that who only fights doesn't die will be rewarded by who was a shahid and died will also be rewarded giving a deeper meaning and understanding And they say there are more than 1000 differences between those recitations Because there are different ways of tajweed, pronunciation, spelling the words throughout the various recitations
My friend, I have TWO different Arabic versions of the quran right here at home. So I hold the evidence that there are more than one version of the quran. You have been lied to my friend. But please my friend, do NOT believe me. Go and buy a hafs quran and a warsh quran (they are the most popular) in ARABIC and compare them. You do not even need to know much Arabic to easily see the many differences in MEANING between just these two versions of the quran. So will you accept my challenge and buy these two qurans or will you keep on believing the islamic fairy tale of the one perfectly preserved quran my friend? And both these versions of the quran are full of mistakes and contradictions as well as approving of evil such as raping women captured in battle (surah 33:50) and wife beating (surah 4:34) and child marriage (surah 65:4) which means that Mohammed and his allah approved of raping little prepubescent girls (those who have not menstruated) which is pure evil. And Mohammed led by example when he married a 6 old child and then had sex with that child when it was just 9 years old. Sex with children is always rape as a child cannot consent to something they cannot fully understand, which makes sex with children evil and disgusting. That means Mohammed was an evil child rapist and disgusting pervert which makes him a false prophet. Nobody needs the Sana'a manuscripts to know that the quran has been corrupted
@@johnzuma4688 That's news to me. Thank you for telling me the difference in Quran(s). Quick searching actually show ke that there are tens variations of quran, yes, hafs and warsh are the best well-known. Regarding their difference, however, I find that the difference is fairly consistent. You can treat them as two different kind arabics which need two different dictionary to translate. Meaning-wise, they are (should be) the same. That being said, THERE IS inconsistency for 'min' vs 'mina' in two out of three examples you provide. This topic deserve further investigation.
@@arifbagusprakoso2308 Thank you for your reply my friend. There are thousands of differences in Meaning between all these versions of the quran. As the hafs version of the Quran and warsh version of the Quran are the most used versions of the Quran they are the ones usually compared. You will find that number of verses in Hafs is 6236, while Warsh has only 6214 verses. In Surah Al imran 3:146 in the hafs Quran it states “And many a prophet fought” and in the warsh Quran it states “And many a prophet was killed”. In verse 2:184, the Hafs Quran reads the verse to be "... a ransom [as substitute] of feeding a poor person...". On the other hand, the Warsh Quran reads it "... a ransom [as substitute] of feeding poor people..." Logically prophets being killed is not the same meaning as prophets fighting and feeding one is different in meaning from feeding many. Clearly we have two different versions of the quran here which proves that the qurans (plural) have not been perfectly preserved. Differences between hafs and warsh Quran. www.free-minds.org/sites/default/files/WhichQuran.pdf
It's really hilarious when people try to say the Quran was changed. Like, if you literally get a group of 3 or 4 children who have memorized the Quran, you can reconstruct it and have it revised by a couple other children, and then you have a complete, authenticated version. How can anyone, then, say that, during a time when tens of thousands of people memorized the entirety of the text by heart, the Quran was changed by these very same people??
Yes. During the time of those early memorizers who numbered in the thousands and who heard directly the quranic verses from the Prophet (p.b.u.h) while he was there with them, any mistakes in recitals from memory can be immediately spotted and corrected. They checked and counter-checked their recitals from memory with each other for countless times. This check and counter-check is still in practice to this day for those who memorize the quran.
@@oliverk3913 Quran is different. You should try it yourself if you dont believe. You can easily memorise Quran. And its automatically keep playing in your head.
Then tell the people to submit to Allah wholeheartedly and leave off sins and innovations, and adhere to the sunnah of the prophet ﷺ upon the understanding of his beloved companions
Yes, as I have expected form the title of this video, There is no different changed quran. My first though was that it was probably just mistakes that have been fixed by a student of the quran. Probably used it to memorize it by writing it down and hardwiring it to his brain with muscle memory. As today most of the teachers say, by writing something down you will remeber it more effectively.
My friend, I have TWO different Arabic versions of the quran right here at home. So I hold the evidence that there are more than one version of the quran. You have been lied to my friend. But please my friend, do NOT believe me. Go and buy a hafs quran and a warsh quran (they are the most popular) in ARABIC and compare them. You do not even need to know much Arabic to easily see the many differences in MEANING between just these two versions of the quran. So will you accept my challenge and buy these two qurans or will you keep on believing the islamic fairy tale of the one perfectly preserved quran my friend? And both these versions of the quran are full of mistakes and contradictions as well as approving of evil such as raping women captured in battle (surah 33:50) and wife beating (surah 4:34) and child marriage (surah 65:4) which means that Mohammed and his allah approved of raping little prepubescent girls (those who have not menstruated) which is pure evil. And Mohammed led by example when he married a 6 old child and then had sex with that child when it was just 9 years old. Sex with children is always rape as a child cannot consent to something they cannot fully understand, which makes sex with children evil and disgusting. That means Mohammed was an evil child rapist and disgusting pervert which makes him a false prophet. Nobody needs the Sana'a manuscripts to know that the quran has been corrupted
@@johnzuma4688Do not spread lies here. There is a difference in the way of reading in Warsh and Hafs, and every Muslim knows this. You must know Arabic in order to know that there is no difference except in the rules and way of reading and intonation. It was proven from the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, that the Qur’an was revealed from God in seven letters, that is, languages of the languages of the Arabs and their dialects; to make it easier for them to recite it, and as a mercy from God to them. This was transmitted by continuous transmission, and the reality of the Qur’an confirms this, and whatever readings are found in it, they are all revelations from the Wise, the Praiseworthy.
@@johnzuma4688Surah Al-Ahzab, verse fifty, talks about the wives of the Messenger. What rape are you talking about? Surah 4:34 says that men are the protectors and maintainers of women, meaning that the man is the ruler who spends on his wife and children. Also, your talk about beating women is because you did not read the entire verse because this is how you want to understand what you want to understand. Allah Almighty says: (And those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and forsake them in bed and strike them. But if they obey you, seek not against them a way), there is no doubt that a husband beating his wife is permissible, and beating is one of the means of discipline, but it is not permissible for the husband to rush to beat his wife in the first place, and he must first admonish her. If admonition is beneficial, then good and well, and if admonition is not beneficial, then he should forsake her in bed. If forsake fails to bring her back to the right path, then he should resort to beating. The purpose of beating is not to harm the wife, such as breaking her teeth or disfiguring her face, but rather the purpose of beating is to reform the woman’s condition, and the beating should not be severe. Likewise, it is not permissible to beat the face or sensitive areas in The body... is finished.
@@johnzuma4688Surah At-Talaq verse four talks about divorce and menstruation and not about what it says about Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace, and fabricating lies about our Messenger, as the verse says that the waiting period for a divorced woman is three months, and also about the waiting period for a woman who menstruates and those who have not menstruated, so the Surah never talks about rape or about our Messenger Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace. I really do not understand what people like you, who are full of hatred, hypocrisy and jealousy, benefit from, so you spread lies. A person like you does not have many friends. I studied psychology and I know people like you very well.
@@johnzuma4688Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace, married Aisha, may God be pleased with her, when she was nine years old. She was the daughter of his close friend Abu Bakr Al-Siddiq. Even the infidels of Quraish did not say anything about her age because it is stupid to compare our time and laws with the laws of people who lived 1400 years ago. There are also several reasons for the marriage of the Messenger, may God bless him and grant him peace, to Aisha. Also, your statement that he was a devilish child proves to me how ignorant and foolish you are at the same time because the Messenger, may God bless him and grant him peace, married Khadija, may God be pleased with her, at the age of twenty-five. She was forty years old. She was a widow with children. He stayed with her until she died. Then he married other women to end the wars, as at that time every tribe was in a state of readiness for any attack. Marriage was the appropriate solution to end the tension between the tribes. Also, his marriage to Aisha was so that she would be a reference for the Muslims, and this is what she became after the death of the Messenger, may God bless him and grant him peace, as she became a scholar of religion. Also, the age of marriage in Britain in the year 1700 AD was twelve years. Also, there is in the Bible the marriage of Isaac to a daughter. She was a three years old, why don't we talk about her??
My friend, I have TWO different Arabic versions of the quran right here at home. So I hold the evidence that there are more than one version of the quran. You have been lied to my friend. But please my friend, do NOT believe me. Go and buy a hafs quran and a warsh quran (they are the most popular) in ARABIC and compare them. You do not even need to know much Arabic to easily see the many differences in MEANING between just these two versions of the quran. So will you accept my challenge and buy these two qurans or will you keep on believing the islamic fairy tale of the one perfectly preserved quran my friend? And both these versions of the quran are full of mistakes and contradictions as well as approving of evil such as raping women captured in battle (surah 33:50) and wife beating (surah 4:34) and child marriage (surah 65:4) which means that Mohammed and his allah approved of raping little prepubescent girls (those who have not menstruated) which is pure evil. And Mohammed led by example when he married a 6 old child and then had sex with that child when it was just 9 years old. Sex with children is always rape as a child cannot consent to something they cannot fully understand, which makes sex with children evil and disgusting. That means Mohammed was an evil child rapist and disgusting pervert which makes him a false prophet. Nobody needs the Sana'a manuscripts to know that the quran has been corrupted
@@johnzuma4688 aint no way bro brought up 2 qiraats of the quran and said they are different☠ did u think u did something😂 every qiraat of the quran has been preserved word for word letter for letter
Some people even found grammatical errors in the lower text, such as in Surah Tawbah where the lower test said "An-Naru Jahannam" instead of "Naru Jahannam", which is bad grammar. And in 9:88 it says "wa ulaaika huwa al-muflihoon" instead of "wa ulaaika hum al-muflihoon", huwa is a singular male pronoun which doesn't agree with the suffix "-oon", which is bad grammar. So it is very shocking that non-Muslims and others try to claim this was an original Qur'an, all the lower text showed was that a tradition of personal copies/training sheets/etc. were present in the time. It is also very likely the writer was writing off of memory, such as the fact that 9:85 is COMPLETELY missing. I think you're right. This is 99% the work of a learner or student keeping personal notes.
Sejak jaman Nabi Muhammad... tradisi Qur'an adalah HAFALAN.. bukan tulisan. Hafalan ini dibaca dan diulang tiap hari terutama saat sholat berjamaah... dimana Nabi yang jadi imam sholat mengulang hafalan bacaan surat surat Al Qur'an sehingga ribuan sahabat juga hafal Al Qur'an.. Ini dilakukan tiap hari, terus menerus, dari generasi ke generasi berikutnya.. Hingga saat ini ada berjuta juta orang di seluruh dunia hafal Al Qur'an... Itu yang membuat Al Qur'an tetap terjaga dari jaman Nabi sampai sekarang
it looks like a draft copy, that was first written and was finalized after lots of verification. As said in the video it is a student most probably and a scholar was correcting him/her. Or this is the first work done by a group of scholars at that time to preserve or write the Quran. Can't imagine that they have done a really hard work. They made sure each and every single mistake was corrected, and they also made more than 900 copies without a mistake, completely identical to what we read and see today. May Allah bless them for their hard work they have done for the Ummah.
My friend, I have TWO different Arabic versions of the quran right here at home. So I hold the evidence that there are more than one version of the quran. You have been lied to my friend. But please my friend, do NOT believe me. Go and buy a hafs quran and a warsh quran (they are the most popular) in ARABIC and compare them. You do not even need to know much Arabic to easily see the many differences in MEANING between just these two versions of the quran. So will you accept my challenge and buy these two qurans or will you keep on believing the islamic fairy tale of the one perfectly preserved quran my friend? And both these versions of the quran are full of mistakes and contradictions as well as approving of evil such as raping women captured in battle (surah 33:50) and wife beating (surah 4:34) and child marriage (surah 65:4) which means that Mohammed and his allah approved of raping little prepubescent girls (those who have not menstruated) which is pure evil. And Mohammed led by example when he married a 6 old child and then had sex with that child when it was just 9 years old. Sex with children is always rape as a child cannot consent to something they cannot fully understand, which makes sex with children evil and disgusting. That means Mohammed was an evil child rapist and disgusting pervert which makes him a false prophet. Nobody needs the Sana'a manuscripts to know that the quran has been corrupted
@@johnzuma4688 your lies are evident for any muslim. And I didn't ask a valid question, but even nonmuslim who has been exposed to Islamic teachings and Qur'an would know that. Thanks for demonstrating the little extent of your knowledge
This is like me writing a a personal copy of "treasure Island by Robert Louie Stevenson" a widely acclaimed popular book with thousands of copies for writing practice or something and then saying the book has been changed.
If anyone in the comments is an Arabic speaker, if you want more detailed information regarding the topic, check Ahmed Al-Shamy lectures and/or debates. He's an expert on the topic of quranic manuscripts and textual criticism on a professor level.
The sann'a manuscript contain (Orthographic Variations, Word Variations, Omissions or Additions like: Uthmanic Text (Modern Quran): "And the greatest bliss is the Good Pleasure of Allah. That is the supreme success." (ورضوان من الله أكبر ذلك هو الفوز العظيم) Lower Text (Ṣanʿāʾ Manuscript): The phrase "ورضوان من الله" (And the Good Pleasure of Allah) is omitted in the lower text. It reads: "That is the supreme success" (ذلك هو الفوز العظيم).
I used to underestimate the oral preservation of the Quran. I mean, what if they forget since human memories are weak. But then I came to a conclusion that this is the best way. If we preserved it written, the documents could be lost, broken, erased etc by someone evil. On the other hand, memorizing is just the best way since it is done by millions upon millions of people throughout the time and they came up with the exact same words and letters. And no one could erase the memories of millions of people unless there is a genocide that kills the entire human race. Masha Allah, I am grateful for being a muslim.
No brother Torah has oral tradition as well and it’s not preserved also it was made into a book since memory is fallible and since so many memorizers had passed away at battle of yamama that in a few more battles the Quran could be lost That’s why it was written and still ppl began writing from their own memories and ppl memory is so bad everyone had a different Quran so urhman had to burn them all Only Sikhi did God have the holy book written directly from The Propher and then checked over by him and still have our complete original and master copy to prove its unchanged.
This was very helpful for explaining the topic. Love your work but especially this one. It makes me more informed and prepared when liars bring up this fake story. It also shows how this is a positive for Islam more than 900 mushafs that are all perfectly pressed.
Al Salmu Allaika brother, I just want to thank you for your efforts on battling misinformation through a great rational and respectful lense and providing such informative and clear Quran is videos. I find your videos extremely helpful as someone who has recently took it upon myself to properly learn tajweed, so thanks again. The style you use for your videos is just as adorable as your handwriting✨☺️, I wonder what app you use 👀Quick question though, in the 30 day tajweed series, does the material cover all the rules of tajweed? And what concise and beginner friendly Tajweed book do you suggest? (I'm an Arabic speaker btw) Or is the 30 day series enough? And yes, I completely agree with your reasoning as to why these claims are not to be taken at face value. May Allah bless you and accept your deeds☺️🌷✨
الله يرضى عنك، ويزيدك علم ومعرفة. صدق الله الذي قال: وَإِنَّا لَنَعْلَمُ أَنَّ مِنكُم مُّكَذِّبِينَ | وَإِنَّهُۥ لَحَسْرَةٌ عَلَى ٱلْكَـٰفِرِينَ | وَإِنَّهُۥ لَحَقُّ ٱلْيَقِينِ | فَسَبِّحْ بِٱسْمِ رَبِّكَ ٱلْعَظِيمِ. فليكن حسرة على قلوبهم الى يوم يبعثون
The most authentic version of the Quran is the oral version. Any printed version that does not agree with the oral one, then it is considered as unauthentic. It is just as simple as that.
Thats why I fight against my sunni wife, when she adds an "bidda - Amin" after Sura Al Fatiha. We should never accept these wahabi takfiris attacks of our Quran, add or reduce not a small letter and with not any excuse. My children understand it but wahabi preachers have successfully undergone sunni madrasas with their huge amount of petrodollars, and partly successful inluenced sunnis to add a word to Sura Al Fatiha, but even if they destroy all sunnis Sura Al Fatiha, we Shia Muslims fiercely f'refuse any petro dollar driven influence, thats why wahabi takfiris hate Shia Musilms more then christians,jews,atheists,hundus and whatever is on earth. All groups, sunnis included, could be deceived by them when they claim to be "real Muslims" except Shia Muslims, they can detect them, expose them and send them to where they belong: wold of munafikun. Thats why all in the unislamic state in Syria &Iraq could pay jizya, except shia Muslims,they were killed immediately, they beheaded even children 12 years just being Shia Muslims...
@@user-wl7sy8et6l Actually the first verse says recite and read. The Arabic word says "Iqra'a" which can mean read or recite. The prophet pbuh thought angel Jibreel pbuh was saying to read so he replied "I'm unlettered" this repeated several times until the prophet pbuh finally understood that he was supposed to recite the verses being recited by angel Jibreel pbuh so he repeated/recited what Angel Jibreel said. Also, The Quran is not just Arabic words, but there is tajweed and specific phonetic sounds that can only be passed down orally. This is something all Muslims know. There is a famous Hadith by one of the sahaba who was teaching one of the scholars of the tab'een. The student was reading from the Quran from the sahaba's parchment, the Arabic reading was correct but it was not how the Quran is supposed to be read so the sahaba told his student "that is not how I heard the prophet recite it." Qura'an literally means "something that is repeatedly recited"
Convey message of Islam to all people of the world and to everyone who will come also convey message of Islam to all world leaders.....................
They got discovered because people forgot they existed for whatever reason over time. Some thinking wouldn't hurt anybody. Mabey you should consider thinking more before writing anything to save yourself from the embarrassment and shame.
Ma shaa' Allah. You were right to advise us not to miss this lesson and share it everywhere. Ppl when attacking Islam they use a technique... They accuse Islam of their own problems so we be busy refuting them instead of opening their books and pointing out on a thing. Even if we assume the bible had manuscripts belonging to the 1st century. We will never know who wrote them... The bible contains full chapters with unknown writers we will neither know whether they are correct... They have no connected series
Thank you for the video, may Allah reward you. Ive heard about this manuscript before and the syubhah associated with it, and usually just ignored it, thank you for clarification.
My skin goes all goosebumps I swear to Allah The Merciful. Each letter and phrase and verse of the Quraan is truly beyond human engineering. in other words, literally hearing and reciting it out laud does something to the psyche and mind of the Muslim. It's heavy, and humbling. It's the best source to hold mirror to your self as it were. It speaks to all of humanity yet speaks to YOU, PERSONALLY. THE QURAN is beyond time and Space, The Quran is key to the metaphysical unseen world . Allah, LaElaha Elaa Huu!
Very nice brother, my thoughts are the same. The Quran is a compilation of spoken words by the merciful Creator, it is not bound by time and space. It is a live timeless document, which scans the soul and nafs of the reader/listener and reveals its in-depth meaning relative to the reader’s intellect level and purity of heart. These are just my thoughts, Allah swt knows the truth. May Allah swt grant us the purity of heart and a high level of intellect, Ameen.
The thing about deception is it deceiving . Your spirit knows its lies. You're speaking over yourself lies and garbage. It's not evidence of truth to have tingles up your spine. Truth is truth and lies are lies. Thr Quran is FULL of lies.
JazakaAllah Khayern and btw i was talking with a Jew with a similar problem and it's that in the Torah the Book of exodus Musa as wrote his about his death and she literally responded by "it's normal for someone to write about his own death in past tense or maybe it was Jousha who wrote it" looks like Jousha love talking about deaths even his own lol
Contradictions in the Bible Nobody knows how many, please check it out which is false book. 1.Who incited to David to reckon the fighting men of Israel? God did (2 Samuel 24:1) Satan did ( 1 chronicles 21:1) 2.The chief of the mighty men of David lifted up his spear and killed how many men in one time? 800 (2 Samuel 23:8) 300(1 Chronicles 11:11)
3.When David defeated the King of Zobah, How many horses men did he capture? 1700(2 Samuel 8:4) 7000(1 Chronicles 18:4) 4.When did David bring the ark of covenant to Jerusalem? before defeating the Philistines or after? Before(1 Chronicles ch 13and 14) After(2 Samuel ch 5and 6) 5.In that reckon how many fighting people were found in Israel? Eight hundred thousand(2 Samuel 24:1) 1.1 million (1 Chronicles 21:5) 6.How many fighting men were found in Judah? 500000(2 Samuel 24:9) 470000(1 Chronicles 21:5) 7.God sent his Prophet to threaten to David how many years of famine? 7 years(2 Samuel 24:13) 3 years(1 Chronicles 21:12) 8.How old was Ahaziah when he began to reign over Jerusalem? 22 years(2 Kings 8:26) 42 years(2 Chronicles 22:2) 9.How old was Jehoiachin when he became king of Jerusalem? 18 years(2 Kings 24:8) 8 year(2 Chronicles 36:9) 10.How long did Jehoiachin reign over Jerusalem? Three months(2 Kings 24:8) Three months and ten days (2 Chronicles 36:9) 11.How many pairs of clean animals did God tell to Noah to take into the ark? 2 (Genesis 6:19-20) 7 (Genesis 7:2) 12.How many stalls for horses did Solomon have ? 40000 (1 Kings 4:26) 4000 (2 Chronicles 9:25) 13.In what year of King Asa's reign did Baasha king of Israel die? Twenty six year(1 Kings 15:33-16:8) Still alive in the thirty-six year(2 Chronicles 16:1) 14.How many overseers did Solomon appointed for the work of building temple? Three thousand six hundred(2 : Chronicles 2:2) Three thousand three hundred(1 Kings 5:16) 15.Solomon built a facility containing how many baths? 2000 (1 Kings 7:26) Over 3000( 2 Chronicles 4:5) 16.Of the Israelites who were freed from Babylonian captivity, how many were the children of Pahrathmoab ? Two thousand eight hundred and twelve(Ezra 2:6) Two thousand eight hundred and eighteen(Nehemiah 7:11) 17.How many were children of Zattu? Nine hundred and forty- five(Ezra 2:8) Eight hundred and forty -five(Nehemiah 7:13) 18.How many were children of Azgad? One thousand two hundred and twenty-two(Ezra 2:12) Two thousand three hundred and twenty-two(Nehemiah 7:17) 19.How many were the children of Adin? Four hundred and fifty-four(Ezra 2:15) Six hundred and fifty-five(Nehemiah 7:20) 20.How many were the children of Hashum? Two hundred and twenty-three(Ezra 2:19) Three hundred and twenty-eight(Nehemiah 7:22) 21.How many were the children of Bethel and Ai? Two hundred and twenty-three(Ezra 2:28) One hundred and twenty-three(7:32) 22.Ezra 2:64 and Nehemiah 7:66 agree that the total number of whole assembly was 42360. Yet the number do not add up to anything close,the total Obtained from each book is as follows:29818(Ezra) 31089(Nehemiah) 23.How many singers accompanied the assembly? Two hundred(Ezra 2:65) Two hundred and forty-five (Nehemiah 7:67) 24.What was the name of king Abijah's mother? Michaiah, daughter of Uriel of Gibeah(2 Chronicles 13:2) Maachah, Daughter of Absalom(2 Chronicles 11:20) But Absalom had only one daughter whose name was Tamar( 2 Samuel 14:27) 25.Did Joshua and Israelites capture Jerusalem? Yes, (Joshua 10:23-49) No, (Joshua 15:63) 26.Who was the father of Joseph, Husband of Mary? Jacob(Matthew 1:16) Heli (Luke 3:23) 27.Jesus Descended from which son of David? Solomon (Matthew 1:6) Nathan(Luke 3:31)}..
بارك الله فيكم... اللهم اغفر لوالدينا و ارحمهما و اجمعنا معهما في الفردوس الأعلى مع الأنبياء و الشهداء و الصالحين و جميع موتى المسلمين.. اللهم احقن دماء المسلمين و انصرهم على من عاداهم.. رب إني مسني الضر و أنت أرحم الراحمين... لا إله إلا أنت سبحانك إني كنت من الظالمين..... ............. ......................... . . . . . .
@@Ii_78i الموضوع عن مخطوطات صنعاء وهي محطوطات مكتوب عليها آيات من القرآن الكريم، لكن بعضها فيها اختلاف عن القرآن الذي نعرفه، والسبب بسيط جدا، كون هذه المخطوطات كانت لطفل يتعلم القرآن، فكان يكتب ويمحي ويعيد الكتابة، والمحطوطات نفسها تصرح بذلك إذ عليها ملاحظات تصحيحية يرجح أن تكون من الشيخ المعلم أو التلميذ نفسه. لكن أعذاء الإسلام من غبائهم ادعوا بأن القرآن أصابه التحريف استناذا لمخطوطات الأطفال المسماة محطوطات صنعاء. مع العلم أن النسخ الأصلية لمصحف عثمان المزامنة لنسخ المصاحف الأولى موجودة في وقتنا هذا وهي مطابقة تماما للمصحف الحالي.
8:24 the strongest statement is examining the text of the letter, how important the contents of C1 were until it was removed from the Qur'an, and thankfully there is an editorial: لا تقل بسم الله, which is an undeniable milestone
It's hilarious and at the same time sad how many atheists and Christians try their hardest to search for mistakes in the Quran, or even invent fallacies about it instead of trying to find the truth behind it, or simply opening their eyes and hearts and try to understand the meaning of the message it conveys. You're not gonna find a single mistake in it, not you and nor does anyone ever found it before, nor anyone will ever do, simply because it's the word of God.
There same difference the early manuscripts also there is misinterpretations of the many of the verses because when the classical scholars were interpreting the Quran to Classical Arabic they used every day spoken language which is different than Quran language which is more grammatical and poetic modern scholars discovered this.
@@riyaansheikh7470that's what happens when family members own the password to their deceased Facebook or youtube etc. Or in some wild cases fake scammers pretending to have died.
@@La_Fata_Ila_Ali No . Muslim usually use boards made of wood, or slates, that can be wiped off. They don't even use paper, as far as I know. nobody would have used parchment for studying.
Muslims must learn from authentic sources, and certainly not the doubts and fabrications from the orientalists and other disbelievers. نسأل الله تعالى السلامة جزاكم الله خيرا
Biggest proof we have lots of people memorise the Quran in the time of prophet Muhammad (s. a. w) still this nowknow also we recite Quran in prayer 5 time also for this reason person have to memorize at least more than ten surah also We read the whole Quran is ramadan night prayer.
Regarding the logical argument: This would be a very strong argument, if these manuscripts would be independent. If the C1 manuscript is the oldest, meaning that it can be objectively dated to have been written earlier than all the others, then all the other books might have been written with the express purpose to be the same as C1. This would actually be very plausible, because they are apparently all part of a single collection. This collection could have been curated with the goal to not allow for divergences. Nobody would know today if there were other manuscripts with differences that have been destroyed, just like nobody knows what's on the missing pages of any of these manuscripts. The question why C1 would have been preserved at all also does not help, because whenever such a decision might have been on, the decision makers might not have had access to the technology that was used to restore the erased text. The last generation that knew the contents of the erased text before its restoration lived at the time when the newer version was written. That is not to say that the Qu'ran is a fake or falsified. It might simply mean that whomever wrote the erased version made mistakes that then have been corrected. But logic does not provide a conclusive argument here. Both malicious intend and human error are possible and plausible explanations. It would have been more convincing if this argument would not have been abused, because trying to make a fallacy an argument displays malicious intend and actually removes credibility instead of adding to it. To transform this fallacy into an argument, somebody needed to find a manuscript that is old enough from a source that it unlikely to have had communications with the curators of this collection. Such manuscripts would be independent from C1. For such a manuscript, this argument could be made with a lot of weight. EDIT: I am not arguing that there is a manipulation, I was answering only to the argument in isolation
@@hasnaali6213 True. but it can give you the impression when it is used. Also, they measure with writing style. so both methods would help to get a more precise date of scribing.
@@Syria_Free_Palestine_will_too What I'm saying is that I had Printing Paper over 10 years old and if you were to use it the ink. The carbon dating of the paper would be over 10 years older than the ink.
@@hasnaali6213 I understood. but tens of years of difference isn't that important when we are dating something over a 1000 years ago. and it's very rare to leave a paper hundreds of years to write on it for the first time. Moreover, the carbon dating method is not 100% precise, its margin of error of carbon dating might reach +/- 50 years or more for a few thousands years old object. that's why sometimes they age objects with intervals instead of a specific number.
Would you mind to make a content about chronology of ayat & surah of quran based on chronology of the Prophet pbuh (ترتيب نزولي) biography? Or have you did it? Thanks😊
world's oldest Quran sample in Birmingham is older than San'aa Manuscript. if a different version existed compared to now. it would have been in the Quran sample in Birmingham which was written during prophets lifetime
There are differences between the Qur'an in Birmingham and today's Qur'an : "A comparison between the copy of MS PaB and the Medina muṣḥaf leads to a number of differences being identified. These variants can be understood as a mirror of the linguistic competence of the copyist and his linguistic context, in that the manuscript bears some phonetic, orthographic, morphologic and syntactic variants, but also a few lexical variants, among which there are variants related to the voice and recipient of the message and some variants due to mechanical errors during the copying activity. Lastly, the manuscript exhibits a few peculiar features as regards the subdivision of the Qur’ānic text into verses. Furthermore, the analysis of the manuscript text compared with the literature of the Islamic tradition reveals a few qirā’āt that are substantiated through the manuscript itself."
Even with the source being unknown. And the manuscript is authentic. There is a tradition of writing the Quran as a means to aid in memorization and familiarization. It’s perfectly logical that the writer was writing off of memory, like a child, and brought it to his teacher and his teacher corrected the mistakes and wrote the overlying text
Yup, and I love how all the examples of a learner is a child, as if it’s something normal that a child memorises the Quran. Which it is!
@@azizsafudin bizarre statement. Virtually all hafiz (Quran memorised) are children!!
so its written with different language. this is summary for this video
@@hk8450 no, it’s Arabic, the researchers founded different textes erased from the manuscript. The non Muslims islamophobes say the Quran was changed and thus Islam is false while in reality it was just a child learning manuscript that obviously was corrected.
@@z0rO999 you have been born into islam, and there is not much hope convincing you otherwise, as your mind operates outside of logic now. All I can say is, don't hate on non muslims. People are not islamophobe if they don't like the religion of islam, they are islamophobes if they hate muslim people.
As for the quran being altered. It wasn't compiled until 650, there is no proof it wasn't unaltered before. And the 3rd caliph ordered that different versions were burned, indicating there were alternative versions circulating. However, even if the quran was perfectly preserved, it is still a flawed book, it advocates for violence, it contains contradictions, among many other problems.
Jazakallah khair for all your great work in educating the ummah with these videos.
That "Do not say Bismillah" on At-taubah is a clear sign it was used for learning.
I know right? We still do that today to learn it's obviously a student copy and we are humans we make mistakes sometimes in printing writing etc although rare but it happens and the Qur'an is preserved by memorization not written
The Christians and Jews are annoyed that their own scriptures have changed over time, so they begin pointing fingers at Muslims in desperation. Despite them wanting to change the Words of Allah, the Quran will remain preserved until the end of time. Allah says, "Verily, We, it is We Who have sent down the Dhikr (i.e. the Qur’ân) and surely, We will preserve it" (Al-Hijr:9).
They’re bitter dead Enders coz their own congregation is leaving by their millions, they think false stories posted online will change our hearts??? The same lies they post about China 🇨🇳
@@Eckhardt-Kiwitt_QS72no he is just QUOTING what Allah said in the quran and if you quote you have to say who said it so Allah
@@Eckhardt-Kiwitt_QS72Bro DID NOT watch the video.
The only reason you clicked just so you can "disprove" the Quran and Islam lol xD
@eckhardtkiwitt8602 The Quran was originally a recitation that was memorized, not a book written by humans. Humans who memorized the Quran came together and then wrote it down.
@@Eckhardt-Kiwitt_QS72 that is literally because nobody else can say it. why would Muhammad pbuh say that when he himself knows he is just narrating for people to write down the message.
Once he mentioned that the erased text said لا تقل before بسمالله in سورة ال توبة I knew it was a student
جزاك الله خيرا
right, it is so obvious, subhan Allah
Thank you. I think that’s the biggest proof, i didn’t think like that maybe i didn’t understood till i saw your comment, i went back and watched the part again. Thank you
BECAUSE SHAHBA REFUSE THE QURAN OF ALI THE MIGHTY AND ZAID BIN SABIT 1ST OF KHIZRIG TRIBE WHO ACCEPTED ABU BAKAR THE CALIPH WAS MADE RESPONSIBLE TO GATHER THE QURAN NOT THE AHLEBAIT
@@fatimakafadak tf ?
@@fatimakafadak lemme guess, Shia?
as a middle school teacher i'm really impressed with your way of elaborating, simplifying and organising topics, so i must say I'm learning two stuff here haha. may Allah reward you and all of us with his heavens
Thank you for our education
Allah is a false God.. and Muhammad never existed
Barakallah fee kum.
618.43 usd? almost got a heart attack when i saw 10000000 lol
@@marshadoww-z5k Same here lol.
@@marshadoww-z5k 618 is ALOT tho
Its 100 thousand rupiah.. less than 10usd
It's in the path of Allah, even if it's just a Penny 💖
Bruh they took a copy out of a 927, a learning sheet, and tried to debunk Islam with. That’s desperate 😂
Well it's not something new they do this all the time lol
Easy bro, seem they becoming more stupid, try to said Quran have many version, 😂
@@thecomedymask9089 they did this to Genesis and codex gigas too
You can’t be serious. A Parchment is not the type of material where you mess around on. Especially when it comes to learning. Its use, given its cost and limited availability was only for the most important tasks done by the most reputable and educated people in a community. This may shock you, but it’s not some form of chalk board.
There are plenty of early manuscripts wherein some mistakes were made by copyists that were subsequently corrected (sometimes even by the same scribe). That's not what is happening here. The entire structure and skeleton of this manuscripts does not follow the standardized Uthman rasm (consonantal skeleton).
Completely desperate having to make a 12 minute video full of excuses in a false attempt to deny the truth 😂😂😂
Bro really said that on a piece of manuscript on a PARCHMENT, It's not a normal type of material yk
I remember there was an atheist teacher in our school going around and telling highschoolers lies about this. How I wish I had the information at that time. Thank you for all the research, may Allah bless you.
To everyone here, check on your kids, know about their friends and teachers, make sure to keep the doors of communication open between yourselves. And seek knowledge and then educate them regarding the deen, there are people there trying to lead them astray.
Turkey has an abnormally large number of atheists. I feel bad for parents who had to suffer like you did because of that teacher and others like him.
I've seen teachers like that and we were able to shut them down with evidence.
@@BlazySM-qp4yn ours was a history teacher too, he was trying to debate the students during the break.
@@ArabMan98 it was in an international highschool in turkey i studied in
there so many shapes of shaytons syetan to make yo go in hell fire be carefull with your family member
Knowledge is power. If you had said that the Topkapi Palace had the handwritten Quran of Hazrat Osman and that the digital text had been checked by atheists many times and they could not find any difference, you would have silenced him. But as you said, they first kept people ignorant and then alienated them from Islam with their own lies.
In Morocco, the traditional method of memorizing the Qur’an in mosques is by writing verses on wooden boards by the students, reviewing them with the teacher, then washing the boards and repeating the process over and over again.
I know that method, it's very good one. Nowadays very rare method to use.
It is still use in Morocco
We had the same here in Pakistan, its called ( Takh'ti ) ....now ofcrs things have changed but still you can find children using them in village schools
That's how I studied, we coat the boards with mud made of a special light grey clay, let them dry, then write on them with a hand made ink and pen, when we want to erase them we wash them off clean with water, the mud dissolve taking the ink with it.
We did the same in Pakistan. As soon as he said there was mistakes, I knew it was a kid trying to practice writing the verses on a washable paper. And it got corrected by the teacher or he did it himself by notating something in the very line he made a mistake.
I've honestly heard of this manuscript before and never gave it that much attention as much as some attackers did since it was after all..."erased", there could've been many possibilities. However, I'll admit that your work was more than EXCELLENT with incredible research and I really wish more people would watch this video, it is indeed an important one as you said it is. May Allah bless you.
Allah is a false God.. and Muhammad never existed
Thanks for the detailed research and clear explanation!
May Allah ﷻ reward you brother for your efforts. 🤍
امين
آمين.
حقيقةً هذا جهاد وذبّ عن دين الله وكتابه العزيز.
ولعنة الله على الظالمين.
This means the quaran is man made 😂
@@adriankoh4859No this means you have no counter argument s after this video exposed your laughable childish zeus like trinitarian lies 😂
@@adriankoh4859 yeah its not like qurans fall from the sky as the brother mentions in the video.
Nice try but the quran was revealed in audio form, as Prophet Mohammad (s.a.w) was illiterate.
did you even watch the video?
I don't usually say this, but you really deserve more recognition. Thanks for all the efforts you put in these videos. جزاك الله خيرا
1- Just a minor point: The cover screen says Old Quran and Quran. Better type: Old Mushaf and mushaf. These written copies are called Mushaf (s) and Masahif (p}.
2- Behnam paper which I see at minute 3: 29: I read it and it is actually a great paper refuting some so called academic work attacking Sanaa' manuscripts Thanks
Many "regular" Muslims do not know that the written Qur'aan is called mus-haf. They might miss the video. There's also the algorithm thing.
many people don't understand mushaf specially non-muslims so thats why
Allah is a false God.. and Muhammad never existed
My friend, I have TWO different Arabic versions of the quran right here at home. So I hold the evidence that there are more than one version of the quran. You have been lied to my friend. But please my friend, do NOT believe me. Go and buy a hafs quran and a warsh quran (they are the most popular) in ARABIC and compare them. You do not even need to know much Arabic to easily see the many differences in MEANING between just these two versions of the quran. So will you accept my challenge and buy these two qurans or will you keep on believing the islamic fairy tale of the one perfectly preserved quran my friend? And both these versions of the quran are full of mistakes and contradictions as well as approving of evil such as raping women captured in battle (surah 33:50) and wife beating (surah 4:34) and child marriage (surah 65:4) which means that Mohammed and his allah approved of raping little prepubescent girls (those who have not menstruated) which is pure evil. And Mohammed led by example when he married a 6 old child and then had sex with that child when it was just 9 years old. Sex with children is always rape as a child cannot consent to something they cannot fully understand, which makes sex with children evil and disgusting. That means Mohammed was an evil child rapist and disgusting pervert which makes him a false prophet. Nobody needs the Sana'a manuscripts to know that the quran has been corrupted
Something else that proves the preservation of the Quran is how it is recited the same around the world. From China, Dagestan all the way to South Africa.
Yeah when you have memories something then you don't need to only depend on the written text
@safayatahmed5887 whyare there iver 30 different Qurans around the world with over 93000 differences between them then?
@@TheJiminiflixthere is one quran what are u talking about , give me 5 qurans😂
@@TheJiminiflix There are about 77000 words in the Quran.
So you are telling me there is a difference in each word there is a variant to other Qurans.
@@ToHimWeWillBeReturnedyour confusing the 7 recitations of the Qur'an,
The 7 recitations or mode of reading
Were sent all to Muhammed their purposes were to make the arab tribes memorise and preach the Qur'an in a more easier by their own dialect
The difference between those recitations is by pronunciation , pronouns
The other changes won't change the meaning but it will deepen the meaning of the Ayat
Like for example:
Fig 1: Those who were killed for the sake of Allah,Allah will not make their work go to waste
Fig.2: those who fought for the sake of Allah,Allah will not make their work go to waste
Those 2 figures deepens the meaning of the Aya,by saying that who only fights doesn't die will be rewarded by who was a shahid and died will also be rewarded giving a deeper meaning and understanding
And they say there are more than 1000 differences between those recitations
Because there are different ways of tajweed, pronunciation, spelling the words throughout the various recitations
Thank you for this detailed video. I have no doubts in the Quran but this will help those who are struggling. ❤
That is true as Muslim we believe in 100 percent authenticity of Quran but sometime shaitan attack some people this will be very helpful for them.
My friend, I have TWO different Arabic versions of the quran right here at home. So I hold the evidence that there are more than one version of the quran. You have been lied to my friend. But please my friend, do NOT believe me. Go and buy a hafs quran and a warsh quran (they are the most popular) in ARABIC and compare them. You do not even need to know much Arabic to easily see the many differences in MEANING between just these two versions of the quran. So will you accept my challenge and buy these two qurans or will you keep on believing the islamic fairy tale of the one perfectly preserved quran my friend? And both these versions of the quran are full of mistakes and contradictions as well as approving of evil such as raping women captured in battle (surah 33:50) and wife beating (surah 4:34) and child marriage (surah 65:4) which means that Mohammed and his allah approved of raping little prepubescent girls (those who have not menstruated) which is pure evil. And Mohammed led by example when he married a 6 old child and then had sex with that child when it was just 9 years old. Sex with children is always rape as a child cannot consent to something they cannot fully understand, which makes sex with children evil and disgusting. That means Mohammed was an evil child rapist and disgusting pervert which makes him a false prophet. Nobody needs the Sana'a manuscripts to know that the quran has been corrupted
@@johnzuma4688 That's news to me. Thank you for telling me the difference in Quran(s). Quick searching actually show ke that there are tens variations of quran, yes, hafs and warsh are the best well-known. Regarding their difference, however, I find that the difference is fairly consistent. You can treat them as two different kind arabics which need two different dictionary to translate. Meaning-wise, they are (should be) the same. That being said, THERE IS inconsistency for 'min' vs 'mina' in two out of three examples you provide. This topic deserve further investigation.
@@arifbagusprakoso2308 Thank you for your reply my friend. There are thousands of differences in Meaning between all these versions of the quran.
As the hafs version of the Quran and warsh version of the Quran are the most used versions of the Quran they are the ones usually compared. You will find that number of verses in Hafs is 6236, while Warsh has only 6214 verses.
In Surah Al imran 3:146 in the hafs Quran it states “And many a prophet fought” and in the warsh Quran it states “And many a prophet was killed”.
In verse 2:184, the Hafs Quran reads the verse to be "... a ransom [as substitute] of feeding a poor person...". On the other hand, the Warsh Quran reads it "... a ransom [as substitute] of feeding poor people..."
Logically prophets being killed is not the same meaning as prophets fighting and feeding one is different in meaning from feeding many. Clearly we have two different versions of the quran here which proves that the qurans (plural) have not been perfectly preserved.
Differences between hafs and warsh Quran.
www.free-minds.org/sites/default/files/WhichQuran.pdf
مجهود كبير مبذول فى اعداد هذا الفيديو ، جعلة الله فى ميزان حسناتكم.
Thanks
It's really hilarious when people try to say the Quran was changed. Like, if you literally get a group of 3 or 4 children who have memorized the Quran, you can reconstruct it and have it revised by a couple other children, and then you have a complete, authenticated version. How can anyone, then, say that, during a time when tens of thousands of people memorized the entirety of the text by heart, the Quran was changed by these very same people??
Yes. During the time of those early memorizers who numbered in the thousands and who heard directly the quranic verses from the Prophet (p.b.u.h) while he was there with them, any mistakes in recitals from memory can be immediately spotted and corrected. They checked and counter-checked their recitals from memory with each other for countless times.
This check and counter-check is still in practice to this day for those who memorize the quran.
Have you played the game of telephone?
@@oliverk3913 Quran is different. You should try it yourself if you dont believe. You can easily memorise Quran. And its automatically keep playing in your head.
@@oliverk3913 no its not you cant compare telephone game with thousands of people who memorize the whole quran.
@@oliverk3913 even if you burn all the quran, it will still revive back because thousand of muslim have memorized it
This channel is a masterpiece, keep going brothers, the Ummah need you more than ever
Free palestine.
Stop it
@@TahaYunus294why?
What effect would it have with a comment like that? Would it change the situation?
Then tell the people to submit to Allah wholeheartedly and leave off sins and innovations, and adhere to the sunnah of the prophet ﷺ upon the understanding of his beloved companions
@@TahaYunus294It raises awarness
Thanks!
Hello, I'm from Sana'a. So happy to see this online finally🤩🤩🤩🤩
Yes, as I have expected form the title of this video,
There is no different changed quran.
My first though was that it was probably just mistakes that have been fixed by a student of the quran.
Probably used it to memorize it by writing it down and hardwiring it to his brain with muscle memory.
As today most of the teachers say, by writing something down you will remeber it more effectively.
My friend, I have TWO different Arabic versions of the quran right here at home. So I hold the evidence that there are more than one version of the quran. You have been lied to my friend. But please my friend, do NOT believe me. Go and buy a hafs quran and a warsh quran (they are the most popular) in ARABIC and compare them. You do not even need to know much Arabic to easily see the many differences in MEANING between just these two versions of the quran. So will you accept my challenge and buy these two qurans or will you keep on believing the islamic fairy tale of the one perfectly preserved quran my friend? And both these versions of the quran are full of mistakes and contradictions as well as approving of evil such as raping women captured in battle (surah 33:50) and wife beating (surah 4:34) and child marriage (surah 65:4) which means that Mohammed and his allah approved of raping little prepubescent girls (those who have not menstruated) which is pure evil. And Mohammed led by example when he married a 6 old child and then had sex with that child when it was just 9 years old. Sex with children is always rape as a child cannot consent to something they cannot fully understand, which makes sex with children evil and disgusting. That means Mohammed was an evil child rapist and disgusting pervert which makes him a false prophet. Nobody needs the Sana'a manuscripts to know that the quran has been corrupted
@@johnzuma4688Do not spread lies here. There is a difference in the way of reading in Warsh and Hafs, and every Muslim knows this. You must know Arabic in order to know that there is no difference except in the rules and way of reading and intonation. It was proven from the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, that the Qur’an was revealed from God in seven letters, that is, languages of the languages of the Arabs and their dialects; to make it easier for them to recite it, and as a mercy from God to them. This was transmitted by continuous transmission, and the reality of the Qur’an confirms this, and whatever readings are found in it, they are all revelations from the Wise, the Praiseworthy.
@@johnzuma4688Surah Al-Ahzab, verse fifty, talks about the wives of the Messenger. What rape are you talking about?
Surah 4:34 says that men are the protectors and maintainers of women, meaning that the man is the ruler who spends on his wife and children. Also, your talk about beating women is because you did not read the entire verse because this is how you want to understand what you want to understand. Allah Almighty says: (And those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and forsake them in bed and strike them. But if they obey you, seek not against them a way), there is no doubt that a husband beating his wife is permissible, and beating is one of the means of discipline, but it is not permissible for the husband to rush to beat his wife in the first place, and he must first admonish her. If admonition is beneficial, then good and well, and if admonition is not beneficial, then he should forsake her in bed. If forsake fails to bring her back to the right path, then he should resort to beating. The purpose of beating is not to harm the wife, such as breaking her teeth or disfiguring her face, but rather the purpose of beating is to reform the woman’s condition, and the beating should not be severe. Likewise, it is not permissible to beat the face or sensitive areas in The body... is finished.
@@johnzuma4688Surah At-Talaq verse four talks about divorce and menstruation and not about what it says about Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace, and fabricating lies about our Messenger, as the verse says that the waiting period for a divorced woman is three months, and also about the waiting period for a woman who menstruates and those who have not menstruated, so the Surah never talks about rape or about our Messenger Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace. I really do not understand what people like you, who are full of hatred, hypocrisy and jealousy, benefit from, so you spread lies. A person like you does not have many friends. I studied psychology and I know people like you very well.
@@johnzuma4688Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace, married Aisha, may God be pleased with her, when she was nine years old. She was the daughter of his close friend Abu Bakr Al-Siddiq. Even the infidels of Quraish did not say anything about her age because it is stupid to compare our time and laws with the laws of people who lived 1400 years ago. There are also several reasons for the marriage of the Messenger, may God bless him and grant him peace, to Aisha. Also, your statement that he was a devilish child proves to me how ignorant and foolish you are at the same time because the Messenger, may God bless him and grant him peace, married Khadija, may God be pleased with her, at the age of twenty-five. She was forty years old. She was a widow with children. He stayed with her until she died. Then he married other women to end the wars, as at that time every tribe was in a state of readiness for any attack. Marriage was the appropriate solution to end the tension between the tribes. Also, his marriage to Aisha was so that she would be a reference for the Muslims, and this is what she became after the death of the Messenger, may God bless him and grant him peace, as she became a scholar of religion. Also, the age of marriage in Britain in the year 1700 AD was twelve years. Also, there is in the Bible the marriage of Isaac to a daughter. She was a three years old, why don't we talk about her??
Jazak Allah Kher, thank you so much for clearing these misconceptions.
Your videos are always masterpieces on RUclips. I am always taken aback. Keep up the great work!
Your channel always inspires me a lot May Allah bless you abundantly Aameen ❤
Jazakallahu khairan. Your videos are always satisfying to watch
w profile pic
And your profile picture is not satisfying to watch.
@@BoxingSnail 😂😂😂
@@trollgegael And you stole his PFP and added a soldier hat?
@@BoxingSnail do you think he made it lmao
You've explained so simply and perfectly. Subhan'Allah.
For sure a student, he/she literally wrote: " لَا تَقُلْ بِسْمِ اللهِ "
قصد الأستاذ في نص السوره.
كأنك مشيت لخلوه لتعليم القرأن حتعرف أن هذي غلطه يغلطونها الصغار كثير .
This surah you cannot read with bismillah.
My friend, I have TWO different Arabic versions of the quran right here at home. So I hold the evidence that there are more than one version of the quran. You have been lied to my friend. But please my friend, do NOT believe me. Go and buy a hafs quran and a warsh quran (they are the most popular) in ARABIC and compare them. You do not even need to know much Arabic to easily see the many differences in MEANING between just these two versions of the quran. So will you accept my challenge and buy these two qurans or will you keep on believing the islamic fairy tale of the one perfectly preserved quran my friend? And both these versions of the quran are full of mistakes and contradictions as well as approving of evil such as raping women captured in battle (surah 33:50) and wife beating (surah 4:34) and child marriage (surah 65:4) which means that Mohammed and his allah approved of raping little prepubescent girls (those who have not menstruated) which is pure evil. And Mohammed led by example when he married a 6 old child and then had sex with that child when it was just 9 years old. Sex with children is always rape as a child cannot consent to something they cannot fully understand, which makes sex with children evil and disgusting. That means Mohammed was an evil child rapist and disgusting pervert which makes him a false prophet. Nobody needs the Sana'a manuscripts to know that the quran has been corrupted
@@johnzuma4688 Get A Life
@@johnzuma4688 aint no way bro brought up 2 qiraats of the quran and said they are different☠ did u think u did something😂 every qiraat of the quran has been preserved word for word letter for letter
Some people even found grammatical errors in the lower text, such as in Surah Tawbah where the lower test said "An-Naru Jahannam" instead of "Naru Jahannam", which is bad grammar.
And in 9:88 it says "wa ulaaika huwa al-muflihoon" instead of "wa ulaaika hum al-muflihoon", huwa is a singular male pronoun which doesn't agree with the suffix "-oon", which is bad grammar.
So it is very shocking that non-Muslims and others try to claim this was an original Qur'an, all the lower text showed was that a tradition of personal copies/training sheets/etc. were present in the time. It is also very likely the writer was writing off of memory, such as the fact that 9:85 is COMPLETELY missing.
I think you're right. This is 99% the work of a learner or student keeping personal notes.
Sejak jaman Nabi Muhammad... tradisi Qur'an adalah HAFALAN.. bukan tulisan.
Hafalan ini dibaca dan diulang tiap hari terutama saat sholat berjamaah... dimana Nabi yang jadi imam sholat mengulang hafalan bacaan surat surat Al Qur'an sehingga ribuan sahabat juga hafal Al Qur'an..
Ini dilakukan tiap hari, terus menerus, dari generasi ke generasi berikutnya..
Hingga saat ini ada berjuta juta orang di seluruh dunia hafal Al Qur'an...
Itu yang membuat Al Qur'an tetap terjaga dari jaman Nabi sampai sekarang
Great video. Barakallahu feek, may Allah accept your efforts
it looks like a draft copy, that was first written and was finalized after lots of verification. As said in the video it is a student most probably and a scholar was correcting him/her. Or this is the first work done by a group of scholars at that time to preserve or write the Quran. Can't imagine that they have done a really hard work. They made sure each and every single mistake was corrected, and they also made more than 900 copies without a mistake, completely identical to what we read and see today. May Allah bless them for their hard work they have done for the Ummah.
The unnamed heroes of the ummah. History doesn't know their names but inshaaAllah we meet them in jannah
My friend, I have TWO different Arabic versions of the quran right here at home. So I hold the evidence that there are more than one version of the quran. You have been lied to my friend. But please my friend, do NOT believe me. Go and buy a hafs quran and a warsh quran (they are the most popular) in ARABIC and compare them. You do not even need to know much Arabic to easily see the many differences in MEANING between just these two versions of the quran. So will you accept my challenge and buy these two qurans or will you keep on believing the islamic fairy tale of the one perfectly preserved quran my friend? And both these versions of the quran are full of mistakes and contradictions as well as approving of evil such as raping women captured in battle (surah 33:50) and wife beating (surah 4:34) and child marriage (surah 65:4) which means that Mohammed and his allah approved of raping little prepubescent girls (those who have not menstruated) which is pure evil. And Mohammed led by example when he married a 6 old child and then had sex with that child when it was just 9 years old. Sex with children is always rape as a child cannot consent to something they cannot fully understand, which makes sex with children evil and disgusting. That means Mohammed was an evil child rapist and disgusting pervert which makes him a false prophet. Nobody needs the Sana'a manuscripts to know that the quran has been corrupted
@@johnzuma4688 how many waqt in janazah salat?
@@iwatchwithnoads7480 Why do you ask me my friend, I do NOT follow the false prophet Mohammed and his false ideology.
@@johnzuma4688 your lies are evident for any muslim.
And I didn't ask a valid question, but even nonmuslim who has been exposed to Islamic teachings and Qur'an would know that. Thanks for demonstrating the little extent of your knowledge
This is like me writing a a personal copy of "treasure Island by Robert Louie Stevenson" a widely acclaimed popular book with thousands of copies for writing practice or something and then saying the book has been changed.
Fantastic bro may allah reward you for your good work
Thanks for an awesome Video, much needed, May Allah bless you Immensely
alhamdulillah , thank for this pure work , may Allah give you Hannah as a reward
*Jannah
If anyone in the comments is an Arabic speaker, if you want more detailed information regarding the topic, check Ahmed Al-Shamy lectures and/or debates. He's an expert on the topic of quranic manuscripts and textual criticism on a professor level.
JazakaAllahu Khairan. I'll check them InshaAllah.
The sann'a manuscript contain (Orthographic Variations, Word Variations, Omissions or Additions like: Uthmanic Text (Modern Quran):
"And the greatest bliss is the Good Pleasure of Allah. That is the supreme success." (ورضوان من الله أكبر ذلك هو الفوز العظيم)
Lower Text (Ṣanʿāʾ Manuscript):
The phrase "ورضوان من الله" (And the Good Pleasure of Allah) is omitted in the lower text.
It reads:
"That is the supreme success" (ذلك هو الفوز العظيم).
I used to underestimate the oral preservation of the Quran. I mean, what if they forget since human memories are weak. But then I came to a conclusion that this is the best way. If we preserved it written, the documents could be lost, broken, erased etc by someone evil. On the other hand, memorizing is just the best way since it is done by millions upon millions of people throughout the time and they came up with the exact same words and letters. And no one could erase the memories of millions of people unless there is a genocide that kills the entire human race.
Masha Allah, I am grateful for being a muslim.
No brother Torah has oral tradition as well and it’s not preserved also it was made into a book since memory is fallible and since so many memorizers had passed away at battle of yamama that in a few more battles the Quran could be lost
That’s why it was written and still ppl began writing from their own memories and ppl memory is so bad everyone had a different Quran so urhman had to burn them all
Only Sikhi did God have the holy book written directly from
The Propher and then checked over by him and still have our complete original and master copy to prove its unchanged.
@@Ss3gokus Fact-spinning much?
This was very helpful for explaining the topic. Love your work but especially this one. It makes me more informed and prepared when liars bring up this fake story. It also shows how this is a positive for Islam more than 900 mushafs that are all perfectly pressed.
Your video was really helpful, Appreciated.
Al Salmu Allaika brother, I just want to thank you for your efforts on battling misinformation through a great rational and respectful lense and providing such informative and clear Quran is videos. I find your videos extremely helpful as someone who has recently took it upon myself to properly learn tajweed, so thanks again. The style you use for your videos is just as adorable as your handwriting✨☺️, I wonder what app you use 👀Quick question though, in the 30 day tajweed series, does the material cover all the rules of tajweed? And what concise and beginner friendly Tajweed book do you suggest? (I'm an Arabic speaker btw) Or is the 30 day series enough? And yes, I completely agree with your reasoning as to why these claims are not to be taken at face value. May Allah bless you and accept your deeds☺️🌷✨
@@broski.bundle wa ʿalaykum us-Salām wa-Raḥmatullāhi wa-Barakātuh
May Allah protect you and guide you 🙏🏼💕✨💐
@@broski.bundle Amīn wa ʾiyyākum
مجهود رائع.. بارك الله فيك يا أخي❤❤
جزاك الله خير على عملك الصالح ان شاء الله
im a german revert, make dua for me that i become a hafith and make it easier for me. i finished tajweed now. i wanna start hifz.
salam from germany
Ameen . May Allah accept your DUA
MaSha Allah
Fantastic video mashAllah. JazakAllahu Khairan
يا أخي الله يجزاك خير على جهدك و جهادك و يجعله خالص لوجه الله.
آمين آمين
نسأل الله القبول
Where do u get the manuscripts?@@Arabic101 i have this (corpuscoranicum.de/en/manuscripts) but idk if its good. Can u name me more websites?
@@Arabic101 اخي هل انت عربي؟
Masha-allah.
Brother how are you making these videos? It's extremely catchy especially for younger students. Please share your knowledge about it.
الله يرضى عنك، ويزيدك علم ومعرفة. صدق الله الذي قال: وَإِنَّا لَنَعْلَمُ أَنَّ مِنكُم مُّكَذِّبِينَ | وَإِنَّهُۥ لَحَسْرَةٌ عَلَى ٱلْكَـٰفِرِينَ | وَإِنَّهُۥ لَحَقُّ ٱلْيَقِينِ | فَسَبِّحْ بِٱسْمِ رَبِّكَ ٱلْعَظِيمِ. فليكن حسرة على قلوبهم الى يوم يبعثون
The most authentic version of the Quran is the oral version. Any printed version that does not agree with the oral one, then it is considered as unauthentic. It is just as simple as that.
Well said
Why, the first verse is very clear... It says read in god name.. not recite in gods name
Thats why I fight against my sunni wife, when she adds an "bidda - Amin" after Sura Al Fatiha. We should never accept these wahabi takfiris attacks of our Quran, add or reduce not a small letter and with not any excuse. My children understand it but wahabi preachers have successfully undergone sunni madrasas with their huge amount of petrodollars, and partly successful inluenced sunnis to add a word to Sura Al Fatiha, but even if they destroy all sunnis Sura Al Fatiha, we Shia Muslims fiercely f'refuse any petro dollar driven influence, thats why wahabi takfiris hate Shia Musilms more then christians,jews,atheists,hundus and whatever is on earth. All groups, sunnis included, could be deceived by them when they claim to be "real Muslims" except Shia Muslims, they can detect them, expose them and send them to where they belong: wold of munafikun. Thats why all in the unislamic state in Syria &Iraq could pay jizya, except shia Muslims,they were killed immediately, they beheaded even children 12 years just being Shia Muslims...
@@user-wl7sy8et6lActually it could be interprete both
@@user-wl7sy8et6l Actually the first verse says recite and read. The Arabic word says "Iqra'a" which can mean read or recite. The prophet pbuh thought angel Jibreel pbuh was saying to read so he replied "I'm unlettered" this repeated several times until the prophet pbuh finally understood that he was supposed to recite the verses being recited by angel Jibreel pbuh so he repeated/recited what Angel Jibreel said.
Also, The Quran is not just Arabic words, but there is tajweed and specific phonetic sounds that can only be passed down orally. This is something all Muslims know.
There is a famous Hadith by one of the sahaba who was teaching one of the scholars of the tab'een. The student was reading from the Quran from the sahaba's parchment, the Arabic reading was correct but it was not how the Quran is supposed to be read so the sahaba told his student "that is not how I heard the prophet recite it."
Qura'an literally means "something that is repeatedly recited"
Convey message of Islam to all people of the world and to everyone who will come also convey message of Islam to all world leaders.....................
I can't imagine to get my practice sheet to be one of the oldest manuscript of the Quran
qwq
They got discovered because people forgot they existed for whatever reason over time.
Some thinking wouldn't hurt anybody.
Mabey you should consider thinking more before writing anything to save yourself from the embarrassment and shame.
Wow!!! Baraka Allah-u fik!! More videos like this!! About other manuscripts.
☝🏻
Mashallah Brother,May Allah bless you
Aameen summa Aameen ❤
Ma shaa' Allah. You were right to advise us not to miss this lesson and share it everywhere.
Ppl when attacking Islam they use a technique... They accuse Islam of their own problems so we be busy refuting them instead of opening their books and pointing out on a thing.
Even if we assume the bible had manuscripts belonging to the 1st century. We will never know who wrote them... The bible contains full chapters with unknown writers
we will neither know whether they are correct... They have no connected series
بارك الله فيك وكتب أجرك ..
Honestly, I think this video is the best video of RUclips in 2024.
جزاك الله خيرا
This is incredibly insightful
Thank you for the video, may Allah reward you.
Ive heard about this manuscript before and the syubhah associated with it, and usually just ignored it, thank you for clarification.
My skin goes all goosebumps I swear to Allah The Merciful.
Each letter and phrase and verse of the Quraan is truly beyond human engineering. in other words, literally hearing and reciting it out laud does something to the psyche and mind of the Muslim.
It's heavy, and humbling. It's the best source to hold mirror to your self as it were. It speaks to all of humanity yet speaks to YOU, PERSONALLY.
THE QURAN is beyond time and Space, The Quran is key to the metaphysical unseen world .
Allah, LaElaha Elaa Huu!
Very nice brother, my thoughts are the same. The Quran is a compilation of spoken words by the merciful Creator, it is not bound by time and space. It is a live timeless document, which scans the soul and nafs of the reader/listener and reveals its in-depth meaning relative to the reader’s intellect level and purity of heart. These are just my thoughts, Allah swt knows the truth. May Allah swt grant us the purity of heart and a high level of intellect, Ameen.
The thing about deception is it deceiving . Your spirit knows its lies. You're speaking over yourself lies and garbage. It's not evidence of truth to have tingles up your spine.
Truth is truth and lies are lies.
Thr Quran is FULL of lies.
JazakaAllah Khayern and btw i was talking with a Jew with a similar problem and it's that in the Torah the Book of exodus Musa as wrote his about his death and she literally responded by "it's normal for someone to write about his own death in past tense or maybe it was Jousha who wrote it" looks like Jousha love talking about deaths even his own lol
Contradictions in the Bible
Nobody knows how many, please check it out which is false book.
1.Who incited to David to reckon the fighting men of Israel?
God did (2 Samuel 24:1)
Satan did ( 1 chronicles 21:1)
2.The chief of the mighty men of David lifted up his spear and killed how many men in one time?
800 (2 Samuel 23:8)
300(1 Chronicles 11:11)
3.When David defeated the King of Zobah, How many horses men did he capture?
1700(2 Samuel 8:4)
7000(1 Chronicles 18:4)
4.When did David bring the ark of covenant to Jerusalem? before defeating the Philistines or after?
Before(1 Chronicles ch 13and 14)
After(2 Samuel ch 5and 6)
5.In that reckon how many fighting people were found in Israel?
Eight hundred thousand(2 Samuel 24:1)
1.1 million (1 Chronicles 21:5)
6.How many fighting men were found in Judah?
500000(2 Samuel 24:9)
470000(1 Chronicles 21:5)
7.God sent his Prophet to threaten to David how many years of famine?
7 years(2 Samuel 24:13)
3 years(1 Chronicles 21:12)
8.How old was Ahaziah when he began to reign over Jerusalem?
22 years(2 Kings 8:26)
42 years(2 Chronicles 22:2)
9.How old was Jehoiachin when he became king of Jerusalem?
18 years(2 Kings 24:8)
8 year(2 Chronicles 36:9)
10.How long did Jehoiachin reign over Jerusalem?
Three months(2 Kings 24:8)
Three months and ten days
(2 Chronicles 36:9)
11.How many pairs of clean animals did God tell to Noah to take into the ark?
2 (Genesis 6:19-20)
7 (Genesis 7:2)
12.How many stalls for horses did Solomon have ?
40000 (1 Kings 4:26)
4000 (2 Chronicles 9:25)
13.In what year of King Asa's reign did Baasha king of Israel die?
Twenty six year(1 Kings 15:33-16:8)
Still alive in the thirty-six year(2 Chronicles 16:1)
14.How many overseers did Solomon appointed for the work of building temple?
Three thousand six hundred(2 : Chronicles 2:2)
Three thousand three hundred(1 Kings 5:16)
15.Solomon built a facility containing how many baths?
2000 (1 Kings 7:26)
Over 3000( 2 Chronicles 4:5)
16.Of the Israelites who were freed from Babylonian captivity, how many were the children of Pahrathmoab ?
Two thousand eight hundred and twelve(Ezra 2:6)
Two thousand eight hundred and eighteen(Nehemiah 7:11)
17.How many were children of Zattu?
Nine hundred and forty- five(Ezra 2:8)
Eight hundred and forty -five(Nehemiah 7:13)
18.How many were children of Azgad?
One thousand two hundred and twenty-two(Ezra 2:12)
Two thousand three hundred and twenty-two(Nehemiah 7:17)
19.How many were the children of Adin?
Four hundred and fifty-four(Ezra 2:15)
Six hundred and fifty-five(Nehemiah 7:20)
20.How many were the children of Hashum?
Two hundred and twenty-three(Ezra 2:19)
Three hundred and twenty-eight(Nehemiah 7:22)
21.How many were the children of Bethel and Ai?
Two hundred and twenty-three(Ezra 2:28)
One hundred and twenty-three(7:32)
22.Ezra 2:64 and Nehemiah 7:66 agree that the total number of whole assembly was 42360. Yet the number do not add up to anything close,the total Obtained from each
book is as follows:29818(Ezra)
31089(Nehemiah)
23.How many singers accompanied the assembly?
Two hundred(Ezra 2:65)
Two hundred and forty-five
(Nehemiah 7:67)
24.What was the name of king Abijah's mother?
Michaiah, daughter of Uriel of Gibeah(2 Chronicles 13:2)
Maachah, Daughter of Absalom(2 Chronicles 11:20)
But Absalom had only one daughter whose name was Tamar( 2 Samuel 14:27)
25.Did Joshua and Israelites capture Jerusalem?
Yes, (Joshua 10:23-49)
No, (Joshua 15:63)
26.Who was the father of Joseph, Husband of Mary?
Jacob(Matthew 1:16)
Heli (Luke 3:23)
27.Jesus Descended from which son of David?
Solomon (Matthew 1:6)
Nathan(Luke 3:31)}..
بارك الله فيكم...
اللهم اغفر لوالدينا و ارحمهما و اجمعنا معهما في الفردوس الأعلى مع الأنبياء و الشهداء و الصالحين و جميع موتى المسلمين..
اللهم احقن دماء المسلمين و انصرهم على من عاداهم..
رب إني مسني الضر و أنت أرحم الراحمين...
لا إله إلا أنت سبحانك إني كنت من الظالمين.....
.............
.........................
.
.
.
.
.
.
سؤال شو قصده؟
@@Ii_78i الموضوع عن مخطوطات صنعاء وهي محطوطات مكتوب عليها آيات من القرآن الكريم، لكن بعضها فيها اختلاف عن القرآن الذي نعرفه، والسبب بسيط جدا، كون هذه المخطوطات كانت لطفل يتعلم القرآن، فكان يكتب ويمحي ويعيد الكتابة، والمحطوطات نفسها تصرح بذلك إذ عليها ملاحظات تصحيحية يرجح أن تكون من الشيخ المعلم أو التلميذ نفسه.
لكن أعذاء الإسلام من غبائهم ادعوا بأن القرآن أصابه التحريف استناذا لمخطوطات الأطفال المسماة محطوطات صنعاء. مع العلم أن النسخ الأصلية لمصحف عثمان المزامنة لنسخ المصاحف الأولى موجودة في وقتنا هذا وهي مطابقة تماما للمصحف الحالي.
8:24 the strongest statement is examining the text of the letter, how important the contents of C1 were until it was removed from the Qur'an, and thankfully there is an editorial: لا تقل بسم الله, which is an undeniable milestone
Mashallah. Very interesting video. Thank you.
It's hilarious and at the same time sad how many atheists and Christians try their hardest to search for mistakes in the Quran, or even invent fallacies about it instead of trying to find the truth behind it, or simply opening their eyes and hearts and try to understand the meaning of the message it conveys. You're not gonna find a single mistake in it, not you and nor does anyone ever found it before, nor anyone will ever do, simply because it's the word of God.
Not true… Qura’an has never been nor can be changed. The upper punctuation marks are added for pronunciation… plz stop spreading misinformation… 1:23.
He never said it was changed though no?
😨 it is true though.
You are incorrect you are confused with qiraat and a7ruf
hes not spreading misinformation u need to watch the video to understand
There same difference the early manuscripts also there is misinterpretations of the many of the verses because when the classical scholars were interpreting the Quran to Classical Arabic they used every day spoken language which is different than Quran language which is more grammatical and poetic modern scholars discovered this.
جزاك الله خير
Allahuma Barik! Very well built explanation. May Allah bless you for the information. ❤
thank you!!! thank you!! I wish I can like this video over and over again .Jazaka lahou khayran
Thank you brother for this important video ❤
Those missionaries maaan🤦♂️, they sure are professionals when it comes to fabricating lies
Joshua wrote in his book that he died at the age of 110 🤦♀
Looks like he wrote from his grave 😂💀
@@riyaansheikh7470 Lol 🤣
@@riyaansheikh7470that's what happens when family members own the password to their deceased Facebook or youtube etc. Or in some wild cases fake scammers pretending to have died.
who is joshua bro?
@@shaonhai9212 Joshua son of Nun, a prophet to the children of Israel right after Moses who led them to the holy land "Palestine"
Jazakumullah khairan katsiran. I'm very grateful to Allah that I'm finding your channel. Thank you very much. Deserve many subs
🤍🤲
Alhamdullilah- this is very nicely explained ❤
the sanna manuscript is clearly a students text book from back when there were not text books to write in. hence all the mistakes and erased area's.
It cannot be a student's bookj, since no student would write on parchments.
@@frankehlig1856well what were they gonna write on? The ground??
@@La_Fata_Ila_Ali No . Muslim usually use boards made of wood, or slates, that can be wiped off. They don't even use paper, as far as I know.
nobody would have used parchment for studying.
@@frankehlig1856 he already explained. It was parchment made of sheep or goat skin, it wasn’t paper
@frankehlig1856 actually it can there is a documentary on the subject on RUclips that explores all possibilities and comes to a conclusion.
Muslims must learn from authentic sources, and certainly not the doubts and fabrications from the orientalists and other disbelievers.
نسأل الله تعالى السلامة
جزاكم الله خيرا
Biggest proof we have lots of people memorise the Quran in the time of prophet Muhammad (s. a. w) still this nowknow also we recite Quran in prayer 5 time also for this reason person have to memorize at least more than ten surah also We read the whole Quran is ramadan night prayer.
Regarding the logical argument: This would be a very strong argument, if these manuscripts would be independent.
If the C1 manuscript is the oldest, meaning that it can be objectively dated to have been written earlier than all the others, then all the other books might have been written with the express purpose to be the same as C1. This would actually be very plausible, because they are apparently all part of a single collection. This collection could have been curated with the goal to not allow for divergences. Nobody would know today if there were other manuscripts with differences that have been destroyed, just like nobody knows what's on the missing pages of any of these manuscripts. The question why C1 would have been preserved at all also does not help, because whenever such a decision might have been on, the decision makers might not have had access to the technology that was used to restore the erased text. The last generation that knew the contents of the erased text before its restoration lived at the time when the newer version was written.
That is not to say that the Qu'ran is a fake or falsified. It might simply mean that whomever wrote the erased version made mistakes that then have been corrected. But logic does not provide a conclusive argument here. Both malicious intend and human error are possible and plausible explanations.
It would have been more convincing if this argument would not have been abused, because trying to make a fallacy an argument displays malicious intend and actually removes credibility instead of adding to it.
To transform this fallacy into an argument, somebody needed to find a manuscript that is old enough from a source that it unlikely to have had communications with the curators of this collection. Such manuscripts would be independent from C1. For such a manuscript, this argument could be made with a lot of weight.
EDIT: I am not arguing that there is a manipulation, I was answering only to the argument in isolation
A very important video,
It needs to be archived,
There is a very clear transfer of information.
May God bless you.
Very successful, thank you.
بارك الله فيك
elhamdülillah, great video
your explanations are always on point
Love your videos! Jazakallah khari❤
Hello?
Hello
There's the Birmingham manuscript probably older than this according to carbon dating & it matches correctly with the quran we recite today 🤔🤷♂️
True.
I heard they only carbon dated the paper not the ink.
@@hasnaali6213 True. but it can give you the impression when it is used. Also, they measure with writing style. so both methods would help to get a more precise date of scribing.
@@Syria_Free_Palestine_will_too What I'm saying is that I had Printing Paper over 10 years old and if you were to use it the ink. The carbon dating of the paper would be over 10 years older than the ink.
@@hasnaali6213 I understood. but tens of years of difference isn't that important when we are dating something over a 1000 years ago. and it's very rare to leave a paper hundreds of years to write on it for the first time. Moreover, the carbon dating method is not 100% precise, its margin of error of carbon dating might reach +/- 50 years or more for a few thousands years old object. that's why sometimes they age objects with intervals instead of a specific number.
JazakAllah Khair
Jazak Allahu khayran
The production of this video was great🎉😅
Alhumdulillah, great video
What a great content you have, thank you so much
Would you mind to make a content about chronology of ayat & surah of quran based on chronology of the Prophet pbuh (ترتيب نزولي) biography? Or have you did it? Thanks😊
One of the biggest miracle of Quran is that Quran can NOT never be changed and can NOT never been re-written.
jazallakhair ya alam, thank you for this video
Assalamualaikum!
Wa Alaekum Aslam🌷✨
Wa ʿalaykum us-Salām wa-Raḥmatullāhi wa-Barakātuh
وعليكم السلام و رحمة الله وبركاته
Very interesting and rational argumentations beautifully presented. جزاكم الله خيرا
Jazak Allah Khairun ❤
They want to find any excuse to only worship their desires
RUclips « suggested » content is doing wonders for me! Absolutely amazing explanation. Subscribed! 7amdulullah.
world's oldest Quran sample in Birmingham is older than San'aa Manuscript. if a different version existed compared to now. it would have been in the Quran sample in Birmingham which was written during prophets lifetime
There are differences between the Qur'an in Birmingham and today's Qur'an :
"A comparison between the copy of MS PaB and the Medina muṣḥaf leads to a number of differences being identified. These variants can be understood as a mirror of the linguistic competence of the copyist and his linguistic context, in that the manuscript bears some phonetic, orthographic, morphologic and syntactic variants, but also a few lexical variants, among which there are variants related to the voice and recipient of the message and some variants due to mechanical errors during the copying activity. Lastly, the manuscript exhibits a few peculiar features as regards the subdivision of the Qur’ānic text into verses. Furthermore, the analysis of the manuscript text compared with the literature of the Islamic tradition reveals a few qirā’āt that are substantiated through the manuscript itself."
Your videos are amazing. May Allah ﷻ reward you for your efforts. Baarak Allahu feekum!