A Future on Rail - 1957

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 30 июн 2020
  • Intended for those graduating from school, A Future on Rail is an industry sponsored film produced in 1957 by British Transport Films. The film depicts some of the opportunities offered to new recruits following British Rails modernization plan.

Комментарии • 30

  • @robharding4028
    @robharding4028 2 года назад +1

    There is still so much romance about the old rail system, I love the old clips,

  • @JimTLonW6
    @JimTLonW6 4 года назад +8

    I liked the lad sitting behind the driver. We went on our first DMU in the late 1950's on the Mundesley line, we sat behind the driver too, and the train touched 60 MPH! Wow!

  • @michaelnewman1920
    @michaelnewman1920 4 года назад +9

    Love these old films of yesteryear

  • @sunilprabhakar2510
    @sunilprabhakar2510 4 года назад +5

    I still remember the stream engines I used to travel when I was a child

  • @simonf8902
    @simonf8902 3 года назад +2

    Last gasp of traditional British railways. Steam still being built.
    Dr Breaching ( sic)unknown. Marvellous.

  • @jimstrainsandstuff9539
    @jimstrainsandstuff9539 4 года назад +10

    Love those old films! I was a whole two years old when they made this one.

  • @sebastiancarmienke3082
    @sebastiancarmienke3082 2 года назад +2

    very Nice

  • @smitajky
    @smitajky 4 года назад +17

    So funny to see this and then think that only a very short time later The Beeching cuts took most of the system away.

    • @neiloflongbeck5705
      @neiloflongbeck5705 4 года назад +3

      By the end of the 1950s BR was losing £100,000 a day. Something had to go.
      And those marshalling yards were a white elephant. Wrong solution to the wrong problem.

    • @nelsonhogquist3247
      @nelsonhogquist3247 4 года назад +1

      0p

    • @Satters
      @Satters 4 года назад +4

      Railways should be a public service not a business, just as the NHS, the closed lines should be reopened and run with low fares, the subsidies to the private companies now is more than it cost to directly fund British railways

    • @ironmatic1
      @ironmatic1 3 года назад +1

      @Alexander Challis nooo but meh steam train

    • @NirateGoel
      @NirateGoel 3 года назад +1

      Most? Only 33% of the system hardly most. Look across the sea, the island of Ireland, about 2/3s of the rail network was cut (not by Beeching). Even now the rail network continues to shrink.

  • @damiendye6623
    @damiendye6623 3 года назад +4

    little did they know at the time Beaching was around the corner to cull it all

    • @bobtudbury8505
      @bobtudbury8505 2 года назад

      beeching closed nothing. the labour party closed the lines

    • @damiendye6623
      @damiendye6623 2 года назад +1

      @@bobtudbury8505 wrong Ernest Marples the minister from transport for the conservative government at the the time or the report and it was them who authorised it. Please fact check

    • @bobtudbury8505
      @bobtudbury8505 2 года назад

      @@damiendye6623 don't give me that old rubbish, at the time BR could not even tell us how many staff it employed! Beeching was then set on to do a report by the torys. When the report was made labour was well and truly in power. They then closed the lines. Not all of beechings reccomendations , some were kept open. However they closed 1oo's of miles not on his report. After the deed was done labour gave beeching an award.Beeching had no power. The madness only stopped under heath, the torys in 1970 ( though a few lines were still cut then as the process was under way.this is the truth and facts , do your own research but not wiki, lefty fake facts there.

  • @davidwpinkston4226
    @davidwpinkston4226 4 года назад +5

    after taking the speed to .75, i was able to understand some of what was said

    • @rvnmedic1968
      @rvnmedic1968 4 года назад +1

      I did the same thing with another video. But when I watched a different one the next day, the speaker sounded like he was drunk, slurring his words, etc. I then realized that I failed to change the speed back to normal. LOL Cheers from Upstate NY!

  • @davids8449
    @davids8449 2 года назад +2

    Sounds very nice but it's the beginning of the rot...... Less staff, more profit, same old thing. How lucky we are to participate

  • @melynagwyrdd
    @melynagwyrdd 4 года назад +8

    So much for the future and modern changes ..... the Woodhead route that was touted as the electric future of our railways lies silent and closed as millions of pounds of taxpayers was wasted in the rush to close our railways

    • @michaelnewman1920
      @michaelnewman1920 4 года назад +1

      Think there's a campaign
      to get it reopened

    • @billbeare1513
      @billbeare1513 4 года назад +1

      Re open Woodhead ?.
      No chance !, sold to the national grid for cabling use for a pittance.
      Millions to repurchase it.
      Tunnels have sagged in the centres.
      Know the area well.
      Also a walk and cycleway, sold for £1 to a private company.
      Should never have been axed in the first place.🧐🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

  • @terencebennison6275
    @terencebennison6275 4 года назад +3

    Seems so quaint now, doesn't it?

  • @MrTantrums007
    @MrTantrums007 2 года назад +2

    There was a future on rail until the Tories and Beeching decided to go too far with the railway closures in the c1960s.

  • @upturnedkangaroo
    @upturnedkangaroo 2 года назад +2

    Back when we had jobs and decent railways and public services, before the Tories ruined everything