Sir, I really appreciate the way you take a neutral stance while explaining such news. As a law student I can clearly state that not many channels do that. Half of them cover a one side story with no knowledge of the facts. Infact, leading newspapers these days cover so many legal news in such a general manner that it looses its true essence. Many times I have seen reputed newspapers using wrong legal terminologies and at times failing to deliver out the correct position.
I support it totally, this is how judiciary works, slay those who think they can do anything in this democratic country, nobody is above the law and this one would be prime example in modern times.
In fact this is a good example for ethics case study...Maintaing the majesty of justice is the utmost duty of the executive bcoz it's ultimately people who benefits
This is a misuse of power by highcourts. There should be a law protecting officers from judiciary. Otherwise dyarchy is back. Both HC and state governments are running the state
Kahe ka ethics... My Lord ki ijjat Ijjat bakiyo ki kuch na... Judges ke bhi bhohot examples mil jayenge... Unhe bhi jail mai daalo... Late decision pr galat decision pr jail mai daalo...
Then why should we conduct election. Why should we send elected representatives who are representing peoples emotions, problem, why across the world constutional makers gave law making right to legislative when we have constutional dictator. In afternoon if judge says its night we all have to obey it. Otherwise they will send executives in jail
@Devraj Singh government can't violate fundamental rights of citizen. Executives are answerable and accountable to legislature. They have to face election. Fear of public outrage is always there. And more importantly we have separation of power in constitution. Its more act like checks and balance. What about courts? To whom are they accountable. Moral here is judiciary need to respect separation of powers and they shouldn't cross blur line between judicial activism and judicial over reach
Jab tak review petition ka decision nhi aata.. Pension dena tha, it is absolutely contempt of court. Like this government can delay untill pensioners died..
DM acting in excess of his authority, Ordering against judgement/order of honourable HC is wrong instead would have informed the honourable HC of his situation due to the review petition filed by State Government as well as marking the reply & judgement/order of honourable HC to Secretariat.
@@amitlal85 abe uske bare me dekh. Use pm se award mila tha jald hi for his good work. Tum jaise logo ki wjah se to koi administration me kaam nhi krna chahta...acche kam ki koi value hi nhi.
भारतीय न्याययिक व्यवस्था चाहे अच्छी हो या बुरी लेकिन कभी भी सनातन की हितैषी नहीं रही है।ऐसा निर्णय कोर्ट का अपने आप को सबसे उपर दिखाने का बहुत सुन्दर नमूना है। धर्म और देश से तो इनका दूर दूर तक कोई लेना है ही नहीं क्योंकि जो कोर्ट देशद्रोहियों और सनातनघातियों के लिए अपना वार्तालाप का पैनल भेजता है उनका विवेक कितना होगा भगवान जाने।
@@kumarakhilesh8981 देश तो गीता से ही चल सकता है लेकिन बहुत से लोग अभी कुरान के खतरे से अनभिज्ञ हैं पर 15-20 साल बाद उन्हें भी पता चल जाएगा कि हम कितने गलत थे।
Responsibilities ek labour ki bhai hoti hai... It's all about the pressure. How well you perform under pressure. How quickly you can think out with solutions. And while dispensing your duties how well you protect yourself is important. All the jobs are challenging today, but not all the jobs have the same level of pressure which a bureaucrat has to undergo. ☺️ A great example for all the aspirants to know wt they are aspiring for and wt challenges it may bring. 👍🏻
Many people here are justifying the order of the court and condemning the act of Mathura DM. I think they fail to understand that the order passed by DM is not on his own whims and fancy. It as per the policy and guidelines of state government. Political leadership and High Court having opposite policy/ruling on same issue. Both of them ordering bureaucrat to fulfill its policy. And then punishing bureaucrats for not fulfillment of the order.
If D.M has the EXECUTIVE POWER then honble court will not address the order to Ministers.... I guess u missed ur political lecture. The power a bureaucrat enjoys in our country,has been designed in such a way that HE/SHE IS QUALIFIED ENOUGH TO MANAGE THE DILEMMAS. Bt the D.M issued a ORDER against a High Court bench order Is a very very very serious contempt. Think this way "AGAR SARKAR HI COURT KI NAHI SUNEGI TOH AAM AADMI SARKAR KE KHILAF KAHA GUHAAR LAGAGA?
@@learningspirit9410 aam admi guhar laga ke bhi kya hi kar lega. Judge sahab ke balkani me 2 sal pehle chiriya ne tatti kar di thi to judge sahab ne 4 bench se order pass kiya ki koi us area me chiriya ko khana nhi dega. Ek balatkari inse to tanga nhi jata. Ego ka probleme hae aur kuch nhi
@@arsih3013 Once NON BAILABLE warrent is issued the person have to be taken into custody (until court quash this warrent). Court to tab hi choregi jab wo sunwai karegi 12 may ko. Tab tak to custody me rehna parega. Problem here is that this step of going to jaid for few days only stops all the future career growth of the person. Even if the court find it non guilty later on 12th may. Still the person is punished for life. No one have problem with some person (whoever it be, a politician or officer) being punished after found guilty. But these steps of the court lead to parallel punishment which remain even the person is not guilty.
I m sure judges never go on ground..even they don't have direct contact with public.. My lord over prolonged period make them feel God.. Making judgement sitting in office may not b correct.. Govt / executive have their own challenges. too much of democracy is not good for a nation.. Judiciary & executive services should have policy of exchange of services(like deputation) for some period .. It's possible by enabling through Job requirements/ educational requirements..
Who solved Ram Janambhumi case pending for century? Why cant ur favourite executive and legislative in spite of having all powers could not solve such problem.? Do u know judiciary is the watchdog of executive. Pl make ur comment sensibly.
You explained judicial part excellent but problem is executive part 1) a person served a nation for years and after retirement he/she has to wait for years for legal benefits . 2) Bureaucracy is not working neutral way in most cases.... If person is influencial then things would be different 3) there is special policy of litigation acts and govt has separate department of legal proceedings which includes judicial experts. 4) but in most cases govt delegates matters to District or tehsil 5) this officers at bottom level don't have legal knowledge but under pressure file affidavit on behalf of government 6) bureaucracy don't show little courage to return such cases back to government 7) there is provision to ask for help or guidance or written order when working outside of your power but being IAS. , They are considering themselves superior or they don't have knowledge staff to follow such processes 8) in this case there is major two issue - one government already denied and other is court's order - being DM , he should have taken permission from government.... However ,in all this , pensoner would suffer delay.
For those who are arguing about this case, I want to say one thing. Courts are above all, even higher than the president(apex court) then who is IAS IPS🤣🤣 sometimes bureaucrats neglect court orders but depending upon the weightage courts acts like this.. they are here to protect the law, constitution not for ego battle okay!!
@@MBO12345 Bhai kya baat kr rha h judge ko sarkar impeach kr degi, judge kabhi govt ko nhe gira payegi, baki law ko null void kr skti h woh bhi ordinance se dubara le aati h govt sc/st act yaad hoga
Those who denies court order how can he maintain law and order in a district? The Allahabad High court has definitely done a commendable work. In India we need a strong judiciary. Allahabad HC has a tradition of passing strong judgement against powerful persons including former prime minister Indira Gandhi.
@@iqra6324 bhai app sahi bole ho. Kuy ke politicians are there boss. Kuch bhi bolo akee(one) DM, ko neta ke orders ko Maan na padata hay. Because the neta is representative people. How can a public servent deny government?
When there is a review petition pending how can hc give orders on contempt proceedings?? In terrorist afzal case, and Delhi rape case courts were giving continuous judgment on all the petitions filed without any contempt proceedings on jail authorities that why you are not hanging when orders are already given.
Judiciary is a joke judges should be recruited through all India service exam to ensure proper standard and not through state level exam also JUDICIAL ACOUNTABILITY SHOULD BE INTRODUCED IN JUDICIARY.
Don't make any foolish comment like a joker unless you have proper knowledge in this regard. Judiciary, legislative and executive functions independently... District judges are appointed by High Courts.. And jurisdiction of HC expends within a state.. So here concept of all india test is a joke... And HC justices are recruited by SC judges based on performance , eligibility and most importantly impartiality of their self to uphold the Transperency of higher judiciary.... If exams are conducted then influence of gov will cast on judiciary that 's unfair and it's not necessary that all aspirants qualifying the exam will not be sold to money... 90% of beurocrates who passed interview are corrupt . That's why to sustain the nutral image of higher judiciary , reliability of justice is to be evaluated by on ground performance not exam
Saheb, 1st your voice is very good and communicating skill is very simple and understanding. Good God bless you. I wanted to study LAW, but our family Economic diginity was marginal. But helping myself in learning from you. Thank you very much. Good night Shriman.
"A person should not be too honest. Straight trees are cut first and honest people are screwed first" ----- Maine bahut barr dekha courts mai ips katgahre mai hai or ias bahut barr jail bhi gae hai Maff krna I m also judicial aspirant but i observe that all in practice time Y janab logg apne power dekha ne ke le in public servants (ias, ips or any) inhe kuch nhi samjhte ,,,,, par Inhe shi kam ke le majboor krte hai.... Shi bhi hai agar judiciary esa kr ra hai ,,,, Kyunki jab yhi batt or order politician kre tab y ias ips krdete hai jald se Inhe bhi judiciary ko samjhna hoga Or to or supreme court ke advocates bhi bahut bejat karte hai inhe .. So respect all who r doing good work either administration or judiciary..
Obviously I don't know about the intricacies of the case (wrt the pensioners) but if pension/salary is a subject of the executive and they have decided not to release it (definitely there must be a rationale behind this). Isn't the judiciary encroaching over the executive in this particular case ?? Can anyone elaborate where am I wrong?
Pension comes through pension rules and services act. If not followed then court will interpret law, weigh facts and circumstances and then decide. Court is not encroaching, but doing its work of keeping a check at executive discretion.
This is how a Senior HC Judge behaves when his ego gets bruised. They went too far with NB warrant. When matter sub- judice for review and DM was not bound to execute the order. Just like one can get a stay on district court’s order from HC. 4 crores cases are pending in India judiciary will not do anything about that but so much interference in the name of justice
its not judge ego , its that the DM issued an order, against an order , already passed by court , which is illegal, Judge have more power than DM , and even its not a district court , its an order passed by allahabad high court , and if you know in 1970s , even then PM Indira Gandhi election was deemed wrong by same allahabad high court , forced then prime minister to step down , Even PM can’t deny same court’s order , why do you think a DM would have any chance ?
Yup the non-bailable part is clearly to abuse the power and show their privilege. These courts can't even find the time to hear the West Bengal genocide case, or multiple criminal cases but get time for this
@Karthik Shubham no , Removing HC judge is very hard , it require 2/3 majority of both house of parliament to remove a HC judge , yogi cannot do anything to a HC judge
Good decision by honourable court.. this type of decisions r need of d hour.. think about those poor pples who's life hs bcame even worse than jail because of this burocratic hurdles..
SSP doesn't salutes DM. DM is not direct boss of SSP, its DIG. DM has magisterial powers , which means , in order to use force , SSP needs DM permission first, also SSP reports to DM on law and order situations , but DM doesn't have operational control over police, once permission to use force is given by DM, it is upto SSP whether to use force and how to use it. SSP is more or less equal in rank to DM
SP/SSP is not of the same rank as DM. Check your State's Order of Precedence. In my state, DM comes in rank 35 in Order of Precedence & SP/SSP comes 39. Even the SP/SSP's Annual appraisal report is given by the DM, which is always given by a senior officer. If an SP/SSP doesn't salute DM, that's because of their ego, but DM is a higher post than SP/SSP.
Police comes under DM as a tool to maintain law and order... Hence, SP/SSP reports to DM and in many states DM write the ACR of SP/SSP. SP/SSP has to salute DM but they avoid it by not wearing cap with uniform as you are not supposed to salute someone without wearing complete uniform which includes cap.
I want judges also to be held behind bars who give unnecessary verdict which eventually turns into a crime!! Example : many time judge gives bail to rape accused bcz of lack medical reports but later the victim is killed by the accused as soon he got bail!! So in this case judge should be taken under custody.
If a DM only acts according to the government executive verbal words without even applying his thoughts n wisdom,,then why is the requirement of an IAS officer at the post, a clerk may also serve the post of drafting the orders....!!
This incident proves courts and judiciary is going all out against any one who is working for a elected govt especially when it is a BJP govt. after all 70 saal walon ki ji Hajoori tho karni padegi na
DM ko Pension release kar dena chahiye tha..Sarkar ki petition ka decision court baad me leta , Agar decision sarkar ke favour me aata to pension amount ko recover kiya ja sakta tha..DM ne court decision ke upar apna decision liya jo court ke order ke against tha..Ye Contempt of court hai. Allahbad court ka sahi decision hai...
He is not in authority to do so at his own will....it's being like neglecting government order and if he passed he would have got suspended with internal enquiry against him..
What officers learned ? .. कि अब आगे से लोगो को गोल गोल घुमाना है, राज्य सरकार और कोर्ट के बीच ... खुद बीच मे नही पडना। लोग जाने, कोर्ट जाने, सरकार जाने ।
Jaruri bhi hai Sir, aisehi agar Courts ke order ka contempt hota raha to courts ko log halke me lene lagenge aur court jane ke bajaay bribe dekar apna kaam karane ki koshish karenge. Court ki garima rehni chaiye itne badey democratic desh mein.
Courts ke order accountibility bear nhi krte....ise case mei hi dekh lo.... Yaha court ne order pass kr diya pension ka bina future consequences ko smjhe....as if on same grounds age thousands log pension lene lge....toh already budget deficit state ka bahut sa paisa sirf pension mei jaega ... Aur smjho sarkar ka paisa nhi hota....ye paisa janta ka hota hai .... court should issue special statement this order is for exceptional circumstance this order will not effective with other case on same grounds
Judiciary ka EGO bahut hota h ...unko respect ki itni aadat ho gyi hoti h aur sab salam krte rehte to lagne lagta h bhagwan ban gye h...chhoti chhoti baat pr hyper hote huye dekha h judges ko!
True,A bill should be passed in the parliament so that IAS,IPS Officers should not get harassed so easily by the judiciary,after all Beaurocrats are the backbone of our country.
Govt should have some stance in this arrest or else DM acts are situational executions...their should be a clean path linked from judiciary to govt and it's officials...when the govt is telling not to give pension den court should ask directly the officials....about that review pettition..y should DM. Alone n individual responsible for the same...
On one hand its necessary for courts to get their decisions implemented and on another hand the executive and legislature branch has to see the larger repercussions of the decision taken. I wonder if judiciary takes everything into consideration. If Govt goes bankrupt paying pensions, how will any funds be left for development. Pensions are an important part for an individual but its also a curse for Govt. Why does only a Salaried person gets pension. A businessman cannot work in his old age, how does society expect him to stay alive without continuous source of income. Businessmen do avoid taxes in many cases by evading them. Govt should reduce income tax levied on Businessman and increase income tax levied on Govt employee to level the field.
Judges should be held responsible for repercussions..Now it's a trend,they just sit and pass idealistic judgments and don't take the practical factors into the account..
DM is at fault here clearly. DM should clearly enforce HC court orders first than government policy. Second mistake he did is he issued a order against the orders of high court. He should have enforced the orders of court and if some uper authority could have stopped the pension he could have atleast present his ground on court.
सुप्रीम कोर्ट का हाल ही में फैसला आया की आयुष डॉक्टर को एक एलोपैथी डॉक्टर के समान वेतन मिलना चाहिए लेकिन राज्य सरकारें इस को इंप्लिमेंट नही कर रहि हे ( हालाकि। फैसला उत्तराखंड के कर्मचारियों के लिऐ था) मगर सुप्रीम कोर्ट का फैसला होने से समान रूप में सभी राज्यों पर लागू होना चहिए?? अगर हां? तो क्या इसके लिऐ फिर से कोर्ट में जा सकते हे?? क्या हो सकता हे??
Court should hv issues a suo motto Constitutional writ of Mandamous and directed the DM. This is misuse if powers by the court to issue arrest orders to DM. What if people of executive start harassing Judges like wise? Court doesn't hv the authority to humiliate Officers and in many cases officers are not responsible as they are constantly transferring.
#Update - The HC has recalled it's order after DM has submitted an affidavit on May 6 and has complied with order of the Hon’ble Court. When the sword is pointed above their heads they immediately follow the orders. Hail ! to Judiciary for keeping these egoistic bureaucracy under control. 1. High Court was perfectly right in issuing Non Bailable warrant as the order issued by the DM on 18.04.2022 was unconstitutional and outside his limits when the order of High Court was clear and pending action since September, 2021. The problem is that Bureaucrats have high ego problems. 2. The decision of HC on September 2021 was after an elaborate hearing, if the court have passed the judgment and the Bureaucrats were just playing delay tactics. It is wrong to say that Government was thinking of other 1000 people who were to claim pensions in future. It is not Government Ideology or arbitrary decisions which run a state office. A person who is eligible for pension must get it in any circumstances whether the number is in lakhs or thousands, these pensioners must have given their dedicated service to the government for almost 30 years. 3. The DM would have saved himself if Government had issued some order before September 2021 and he was not in authority to pass an order contradictory to HC Order even Chief Minister or Prime Minister don't have such powers. He could have easily moved to SC challenging such an order of HC.
This is judicial Overreach If this continues, then I prefer dictatorship over democracy. No one can become too smart be it judiciary or IAS Most of them are those who couldn't qualify upsc but filled with ego n mediocrity
@@karansingh-ez6jc It seems you are a UPSC aspirant, what are your thoughts about IAS Pooja Singhal who was caught by ED after cracking UPSC. Cracking UPSC doesn't tell your merits as a human being. Judiciary has anytime better public trust than executives around the world. Many legal personalities left civil services to join legal profession. Judicial Overeach becomes necessary when the bureaucrats disturb the public, they are servants of public. Civil servants have to work under law.
@@AKOjhaji Judiciary must take action against such corrupt people who r termites. Judiciary also plays a key role in improving the laws and government orders in public interest. That is fair and just. But this case is more reflective of ego. They could have registered their concerns rather than issuing NBW. Judicial activism is a good thing but Judicial Overreach isn't. We dont have Parliamentary supremacy or executive supremacy or Judicial supremacy but Constitutional supremacy
What about this pathetic and lethargic judiciary that has failed to deliver justice to crores of Indians? Who will issue warrants against them and who will punish them for their crimes against humanity? These judges should be incarcerated for life.
Filling Review petition is not enough, unless a stay is granted on the previous order in the said review petition, one has to obey orders of the court. After all they have fought the case and won a battle in the court on merits, if the administration is in contempt, what can you expect from common citizen. DM should not pass an order which has disempowered/underpowered a HC order
Ilahabad High court's decision to giving non-bailable warrant is very necessary to show the power of judiciary and make change the rude manners of bureaucrats
वे 3 कर्मचारी ये अच्छी तरह से जानते है के वे बोहोत बाद में रेगुलर हुए है, और रेगुलर होने के बाद की सेवा अवधि के आधार पर वे पेंशन की पात्रता नही रखते है। ये जानते हुए भी की नियुक्ति के समय ही उन्हें ये बता दिया गया था की आप रेगुलर नही है, तब रोजगार पाने के उन्हे सब मंजूर था अब जब सेवा निवृत हो गए है तो इस प्रकार की याचिका लगाकर सरकार और कोर्ट का समय खराब करते है।
Even after Court orders if administrators are reluctant to implement court backed decisions then there's serious doubt on their capabilities to handle situations and pressure. In case they are not in a position to implement Honble Court orders then they should challenge that in High court or Supreme court
Pehle 36 ka आकडा legislature vs Judiciary ke beech hai... Ab se Executive vs Judiciary ke beech. Kaha jaye kiske pass jaye. Fair justice ke chakkar me web series material mil gaya.
If He Filed Counter Response...And This Is A Valid Response That Govt. Filed Review Petition Regrading This...And He Has To Wait For That...He Can't Do Things Against The Decision Of Govt...So What Is Wrong...If There Is Anything Wrong Then Court May Notice Him To Present Before The Court....Why The Non Bailable Warrent..??? If Not As A DM...But As A Normal Person He Has Dignity.... Some Time I Feel Judiciary Day By Day Crossing Its Limit (Lakhsman Rekha) In The Name Of Independent Judiciary... Judicial Activism...Etc..Etc...
@@tnverma_indiaIt's Not About The Civil Servants or Bureaucrats...It's About The Judiciary Vs Govt...Whic Isn't A New Thing...But The Bad Thing Is Always Govt. Servants...Police Etc..Are Becoming Soft Targets... Govt. Is Staying In Its Limit Because There Is Judiciary For Checks n Balances...But In Other Hand There Is No Such Checks n Balances Or Limit On Judiciary... Neither There Is Any Role Of Govt. Nor There Is Any Role Of People In Appointment Process Etc... Neither Judiciary Is A Elected Body Nor It Is Responsible To People Like Legislature n Executive... Unfortunately If They Will Not Do Anything Regarding This Then Just Like Legislature n Executive.. Judiciary Will Loss Its Relevance.. Respect..Etc.. Which Will Definitely Be A Very Wrong Thing....
@@shuvendurout3576 yes i totally agree. Judicial transparency and accountability is the need of the hour. We want a nation lead by people that we chose ,not by someone just clearing a pcs exam. I will prefer controlled (by people) fool over uncontrolled intellectual to run the country.
@@nitinmishra3017 bhai agar koi link h toh dikha do kyoki DM ko arrest karne ke liye state ki prior permission leni padti h aur is matter me state permission dega nahi.
Issuing office order against high court order is grossly wrong and bad in law.. poor fellow not advised well by legal department..and DM thought himself above the Honorable High Court..if DM does such things to High Court then what they must be doing to aam janta... arrival of real democracy by Court's orders..
Hum decisions pending krenge. Murderes rapists ko bail denge 10 saal tak Riots instability ko ignire krenge. Hmare orders nhi manega use arrest kraynge. DM he kuna ho. -we are indian judiciary
Harshit sir with all due respect, but I think you have misunderstood some time line of the facts of the case. In its September 2021 order, the Court had observed that the services rendered for a "very long period" cannot be ignored while computing qualifying services. It was in this context, hearing the contempt petition in Feb 2022, the Court sought the response of the DM Mathura, and again ordered it to comply with the order of the Writ Court. Pursuant to the above order of the Court, the DM Mathura filed a compliance affidavit filed before the Court enclosing an order passed by him on 18.04.2022, wherein, he had refused to grant the benefit of service rendered by the applicants prior to their regularization. So the administrative order by the Respected DM of Mathura was passed after the response was asked by the Honbl HC seeking the reason for not implementing the previous dated order and again a reminder was made to comply with the order. As far as review of the order is concerned, the court stated that:- It is expected that the District Magistrate should know the basic principle of law that till the order has not been stayed, the order shall remain in force, and the authority is bound to comply with the order. Thus, his later act of issuing an administrative order contrary to the current existing decision of the Highest Court of the state amounted contempt as the DM had no such overriding administrative power to do such an act, since until the court's decision was stayed the previous order was unconditionally applicable over the state. Also Terming the order of the DM as nothing but an abuse of power on the part of the District Magistrate and which amounted to gross disrespect to the order of this Court, the Court further remarked thus: " Though, normally this Court would have issued a nonbailable warrant, but in such glaring facts where the order of this Court has been violated with impunity, this Court cannot shut its eyes, and to uphold the majesty and dignity of the Court so that confidence of public may not erode in the judicial system, this Court finds it to be a fit and appropriate case in which non-bailable warrant is issued against the District Magistrate, Mathura who shall be produced in police custody on the next date fixed."
@@Woyseng crisp and consise sometimes is not sufficient and warrants detailed facts so as to clear the misunderstanding of people like Harshit Dwivedi.
@@mmdmm6 kya karne ae ho yaha jiski izza t nahi karte uski vedio me comment karne..... Dwivedi sir is great all his efforts and work is for providing knowledge to all students....money should not be a barrier for education.....sir has been trying to make it true.....
Judiciary is very proactive in govt policies. If everything is decision is decided by court than there is no relevant of EC and Govt. Let's rules them court.
now the public prosecutor or who ever on behalf of the state should approach the supreme court to stay this NBW. then the PP should lead the case in the proceedings on behalf of the state
Ab sarkar ko kuch aisa karna chahiye jisse judiciary ki Maa-behen ek ho jaye. Bahut ho gya inn judges ka natak. Aj toh CJI khule aam govt ko phatkar laga rahi hai. Kal dhamki dega aur manmani karega. Aukat mein rehna toh yehlog bhul gaye. Apne nepotism ko banaye rakhne k liye collegium system ko hatane nhi de rahe hai. Aisa lagta hai ab yeh judges sabse jyada corrupt hai. Bahut ghatiya judiciary ka halat hai iss desh mein.
Simple, RDC could notify DM's residence as prison and he could stay and work from home till then. DM didn't commit any serious crime. He is just the disbursing authority of Pension at district level. Issue of Pension has to be dealt with state Pension Dept, which is headed by another IAS officer of Principal Secretary Rank. It's easy for a court to issue an order to give the pension, but the question is we're is the funds to generate the pension ??
I support it completely... legislative+ executive run the govt in reality ( not only executive) executive blindly support Netajj..now they will ask nEtaj ..why should i sign ..if i can get arrested broo
Sarkaar ke khilaaf bolo to ... UAPA.. sedition charges thok do... Or courts ke khilaaf bolo to Contempt of court thok do... Kuch bhi ho... Courts/Govt nahi sudhrenge hum sahi hai to bas hai... Aapki emotions, justice delay, or wrong verdicts hamare liye kuch maayne nahi rakhte....
There should be law to even punish judge if they pass wrong judgement, few of judges in their old age are passing any judge's. Law should be respected not the once who is sitting there as judge.
Sir, I really appreciate the way you take a neutral stance while explaining such news. As a law student I can clearly state that not many channels do that.
Half of them cover a one side story with no knowledge of the facts.
Infact, leading newspapers these days cover so many legal news in such a general manner that it looses its true essence. Many times I have seen reputed newspapers using wrong legal terminologies and at times failing to deliver out the correct position.
A
Zzz
Law is supreme . Every citizen must follow and respect law and the Judges .
@vlad I totally agree. Mostly that is the case.
माननीय कोर्ट द्वारा लिया ऐसा फैसला जनसाधारण का विश्वास न्याय प्रणाली पर और बढ़ा देता है।
Kabhi kabhi legislative ke upar v action lena chaiye court ko bekar me executive ke upar le raha hai !!!!!!
I support it totally, this is how judiciary works, slay those who think they can do anything in this democratic country, nobody is above the law and this one would be prime example in modern times.
Our judiciary is suck bro
They turn capital punishment of minor girl rapist into life time prison.
In fact this is a good example for ethics case study...Maintaing the majesty of justice is the utmost duty of the executive bcoz it's ultimately people who benefits
This is a misuse of power by highcourts. There should be a law protecting officers from judiciary. Otherwise dyarchy is back. Both HC and state governments are running the state
Kahe ka ethics... My Lord ki ijjat Ijjat bakiyo ki kuch na... Judges ke bhi bhohot examples mil jayenge... Unhe bhi jail mai daalo... Late decision pr galat decision pr jail mai daalo...
@@sarwanrathore36 ha bhai..they don't even understand ethics
Then why should we conduct election. Why should we send elected representatives who are representing peoples emotions, problem, why across the world constutional makers gave law making right to legislative when we have constutional dictator. In afternoon if judge says its night we all have to obey it. Otherwise they will send executives in jail
@Devraj Singh government can't violate fundamental rights of citizen.
Executives are answerable and accountable to legislature. They have to face election. Fear of public outrage is always there. And more importantly we have separation of power in constitution. Its more act like checks and balance.
What about courts? To whom are they accountable.
Moral here is judiciary need to respect separation of powers and they shouldn't cross blur line between judicial activism and judicial over reach
Jab tak review petition ka decision nhi aata.. Pension dena tha, it is absolutely contempt of court. Like this government can delay untill pensioners died..
Agar review petition mein result govt ki taraf se nikla toh kya pension diya wo kya cheen ke lega kya.
@@pranayvidhate3886 na but pension stop ho jayega..... Q ki india ki welfare state hea as per Constitution under Article 38
@@shyamsundarbhardwaj4839 Pension ke liye itna action aur rape case 7-10 saal se latak matak....aja baby satak satak
DM acting in excess of his authority, Ordering against judgement/order of honourable HC is wrong instead would have informed the honourable HC of his situation due to the review petition filed by State Government as well as marking the reply & judgement/order of honourable HC to Secretariat.
Review petition dala hai usme high court ke decision ka stay ka order hai ? Agar nahi hai to DM ki galti hai
@@amitlal85 Filing of Review petition does not mean stay on the previous judgement/order.
Ab dm itna kam chhor ke HC me baitha rhe jake...roj to HC tang arati hai administration me...india needs to control its judiciary
@@tnverma_india kaam hi nahi kiya to court kya jail bhi jana parega . Jiska pension rok ke baith gaya uska kaun sunega ?
@@amitlal85 abe uske bare me dekh. Use pm se award mila tha jald hi for his good work. Tum jaise logo ki wjah se to koi administration me kaam nhi krna chahta...acche kam ki koi value hi nhi.
Issue is this : DM signing and implementing an order that goes against Court Order. Not acceptable under any circumstance.
Same old scapegoat case
he was dm of chandauli just before here.very good guy
Hmm
Navneet chahal sir be like " in sab mei meri kya galti thi , sign kru toh court action lega nhi kru toh government"
Navneet chahal be like : mujhe kyon toda!
That is why upsc is not easy
Navneet be like :- to mai kya karu job chod du 😀
He is people's servant.
Moral-UPSC prep me G*nd Fat ti hei...Aur Clear karke Senior v bangeye...to Aur Jyada G*nd fat ti hei 😂😂
भारतीय न्याययिक व्यवस्था चाहे अच्छी हो या बुरी लेकिन कभी भी सनातन की हितैषी नहीं रही है।ऐसा निर्णय कोर्ट का अपने आप को सबसे उपर दिखाने का बहुत सुन्दर नमूना है। धर्म और देश से तो इनका दूर दूर तक कोई लेना है ही नहीं क्योंकि जो कोर्ट देशद्रोहियों और सनातनघातियों के लिए अपना वार्तालाप का पैनल भेजता है उनका विवेक कितना होगा भगवान जाने।
ध्यान रखना देश गीता रामायण कुरआन से नही चलता।
@@kumarakhilesh8981 देश तो गीता से ही चल सकता है लेकिन बहुत से लोग अभी कुरान के खतरे से अनभिज्ञ हैं पर 15-20 साल बाद उन्हें भी पता चल जाएगा कि हम कितने गलत थे।
@@sunilnadda816 गीता में कौन सा कानून है भाई?
Responsibilities ek labour ki bhai hoti hai... It's all about the pressure. How well you perform under pressure. How quickly you can think out with solutions. And while dispensing your duties how well you protect yourself is important. All the jobs are challenging today, but not all the jobs have the same level of pressure which a bureaucrat has to undergo. ☺️ A great example for all the aspirants to know wt they are aspiring for and wt challenges it may bring. 👍🏻
Many people here are justifying the order of the court and condemning the act of Mathura DM. I think they fail to understand that the order passed by DM is not on his own whims and fancy. It as per the policy and guidelines of state government.
Political leadership and High Court having opposite policy/ruling on same issue. Both of them ordering bureaucrat to fulfill its policy. And then punishing bureaucrats for not fulfillment of the order.
If D.M has the EXECUTIVE POWER then honble court will not address the order to Ministers.... I guess u missed ur political lecture. The power a bureaucrat enjoys in our country,has been designed in such a way that HE/SHE IS QUALIFIED ENOUGH TO MANAGE THE DILEMMAS. Bt the D.M issued a ORDER against a High Court bench order Is a very very very serious contempt. Think this way "AGAR SARKAR HI COURT KI NAHI SUNEGI TOH AAM AADMI SARKAR KE KHILAF KAHA GUHAAR LAGAGA?
When u get knowledge from whatsap only
Chacha ,,agar ye innocent hoga to high court ise chor v dega
@@learningspirit9410 aam admi guhar laga ke bhi kya hi kar lega. Judge sahab ke balkani me 2 sal pehle chiriya ne tatti kar di thi to judge sahab ne 4 bench se order pass kiya ki koi us area me chiriya ko khana nhi dega. Ek balatkari inse to tanga nhi jata. Ego ka probleme hae aur kuch nhi
@@arsih3013 Once NON BAILABLE warrent is issued the person have to be taken into custody (until court quash this warrent). Court to tab hi choregi jab wo sunwai karegi 12 may ko. Tab tak to custody me rehna parega.
Problem here is that this step of going to jaid for few days only stops all the future career growth of the person. Even if the court find it non guilty later on 12th may. Still the person is punished for life.
No one have problem with some person (whoever it be, a politician or officer) being punished after found guilty. But these steps of the court lead to parallel punishment which remain even the person is not guilty.
I m sure judges never go on ground..even they don't have direct contact with public.. My lord over prolonged period make them feel God.. Making judgement sitting in office may not b correct.. Govt / executive have their own challenges. too much of democracy is not good for a nation.. Judiciary & executive services should have policy of exchange of services(like deputation) for some period .. It's possible by enabling through Job requirements/ educational requirements..
Who solved Ram Janambhumi case pending for century? Why cant ur favourite executive and legislative in spite of having all powers could not solve such problem.? Do u know judiciary is the watchdog of executive. Pl make ur comment sensibly.
You explained judicial part excellent but problem is executive part
1) a person served a nation for years and after retirement he/she has to wait for years for legal benefits .
2) Bureaucracy is not working neutral way in most cases.... If person is influencial then things would be different
3) there is special policy of litigation acts and govt has separate department of legal proceedings which includes judicial experts.
4) but in most cases govt delegates matters to District or tehsil
5) this officers at bottom level don't have legal knowledge but under pressure file affidavit on behalf of government
6) bureaucracy don't show little courage to return such cases back to government
7) there is provision to ask for help or guidance or written order when working outside of your power but being IAS. , They are considering themselves superior or they don't have knowledge staff to follow such processes
8) in this case there is major two issue - one government already denied and other is court's order - being DM , he should have taken permission from government....
However ,in all this , pensoner would suffer delay.
True brother this part should have been covered
For those who are arguing about this case, I want to say one thing. Courts are above all, even higher than the president(apex court) then who is IAS IPS🤣🤣 sometimes bureaucrats neglect court orders but depending upon the weightage courts acts like this.. they are here to protect the law, constitution not for ego battle okay!!
Sarkaar sbse upr hai hamesha judge ias kuch nhe
@@saurabhpatel3022 sarkar aur judiciary parallel hai bro, judiciary sarkar ko girasaktha he lekin sarkar judiciary ko nahi girasaktha he..
@@MBO12345 Bhai kya baat kr rha h judge ko sarkar impeach kr degi, judge kabhi govt ko nhe gira payegi, baki law ko null void kr skti h woh bhi ordinance se dubara le aati h govt sc/st act yaad hoga
@@MBO12345 Konsa polity padha he bhai🙄
Higher than the president???🤔
He can still apply for Anticipatory bail. No need to remain in jail if AB is accepted
@@gauravvkanishk it was reintroduced in 2019. So now it is applicable .
Sir ji your explanation is quite different from other which makes the topic more interesting.....
I think in this case court also need to understand that DM don't pay pension by his own. It's the government policy..
Correct
Matalb gov ki galtiya bhi officers hi bear kare...
Yes,that's why beaurocracy is created in india....it's a escape route for governments
Those who denies court order how can he maintain law and order in a district? The Allahabad High court has definitely done a commendable work. In India we need a strong judiciary. Allahabad HC has a tradition of passing strong judgement against powerful persons including former prime minister Indira Gandhi.
To phir neta ke khilaf kyun nehi hota contempt of court
@@iqra6324 Chavanni Chhaap Neta K Paas Public Support hota hai...
@@iqra6324 bhai app sahi bole ho. Kuy ke politicians are there boss. Kuch bhi bolo akee(one) DM, ko neta ke orders ko Maan na padata hay. Because the neta is representative people. How can a public servent deny government?
@@iqra6324
Nnnnmlkñ
as sir has told in the polity videos, the IAS/IPS is the guinea pig for the mistakes of the politicians. that's why it is high risk job.
When there is a review petition pending how can hc give orders on contempt proceedings?? In terrorist afzal case, and Delhi rape case courts were giving continuous judgment on all the petitions filed without any contempt proceedings on jail authorities that why you are not hanging when orders are already given.
Redressal of grievance against judge ...should place a petition in Supreme Court
Court decision must be always out of politics. Otherwise this
BJP is eating people rights like a dictator
Waah
Dictator dekha h kabhi real me?
Indra gandi ko dekhta to pta chalta
2016 me kiski government me thi UP me.... Pehle ye check karo
@@Bansaliens
Dikh ne rha kya tujhe. Ab mai fir andh bhakt boluga toh bura lagega, better hai khud dekh le acche se...
@@anubhavdwivedi2997 kya tujhe lagta abe iss baat k liye, kisi court k decision per party baji karni chahiye, aaj kis ke, kal kis ke party...
Judiciary is a joke judges should be recruited through all India service exam to ensure proper standard and not through state level exam also JUDICIAL ACOUNTABILITY SHOULD BE INTRODUCED IN JUDICIARY.
You are a joke. Lol
Don't make any foolish comment like a joker unless you have proper knowledge in this regard. Judiciary, legislative and executive functions independently... District judges are appointed by High Courts.. And jurisdiction of HC expends within a state.. So here concept of all india test is a joke... And HC justices are recruited by SC judges based on performance , eligibility and most importantly impartiality of their self to uphold the Transperency of higher judiciary.... If exams are conducted then influence of gov will cast on judiciary that 's unfair and it's not necessary that all aspirants qualifying the exam will not be sold to money... 90% of beurocrates who passed interview are corrupt . That's why to sustain the nutral image of higher judiciary , reliability of justice is to be evaluated by on ground performance not exam
@@thevoicev969 you are right.good...
Saheb, 1st your voice is very good and communicating skill is very simple and understanding. Good God bless you. I wanted to study LAW, but our family Economic diginity was marginal. But helping myself in learning from you. Thank you very much. Good night Shriman.
"A person should not be too honest. Straight trees are cut first and honest people are screwed first" -----
Maine bahut barr dekha courts mai ips katgahre mai hai or ias bahut barr jail bhi gae hai
Maff krna I m also judicial aspirant but i observe that all in practice time
Y janab logg apne power dekha ne ke le in public servants (ias, ips or any) inhe kuch nhi samjhte ,,,,, par
Inhe shi kam ke le majboor krte hai....
Shi bhi hai agar judiciary esa kr ra hai ,,,,
Kyunki jab yhi batt or order politician kre tab y ias ips krdete hai jald se
Inhe bhi judiciary ko samjhna hoga
Or to or supreme court ke advocates bhi bahut bejat karte hai inhe ..
So respect all who r doing good work either administration or judiciary..
Obviously I don't know about the intricacies of the case (wrt the pensioners) but if pension/salary is a subject of the executive and they have decided not to release it (definitely there must be a rationale behind this). Isn't the judiciary encroaching over the executive in this particular case ??
Can anyone elaborate where am I wrong?
Rationale is decided in court not by executive's descretion.
Pension comes through pension rules and services act. If not followed then court will interpret law, weigh facts and circumstances and then decide. Court is not encroaching, but doing its work of keeping a check at executive discretion.
Judiciary ko v soch samajh kar decision deni chahiye otherwise judiciary par v koi bharosa nhi karega.
This is how a Senior HC Judge behaves when his ego gets bruised. They went too far with NB warrant. When matter sub- judice for review and DM was not bound to execute the order.
Just like one can get a stay on district court’s order from HC.
4 crores cases are pending in India judiciary will not do anything about that but so much interference in the name of justice
its not judge ego , its that the DM issued an order, against an order , already passed by court , which is illegal, Judge have more power than DM , and even its not a district court , its an order passed by allahabad high court , and if you know in 1970s , even then PM Indira Gandhi election was deemed wrong by same allahabad high court , forced then prime minister to step down , Even PM can’t deny same court’s order , why do you think a DM would have any chance ?
Yup the non-bailable part is clearly to abuse the power and show their privilege. These courts can't even find the time to hear the West Bengal genocide case, or multiple criminal cases but get time for this
Absolutely true .. 👌👌
@Karthik Shubham no , Removing HC judge is very hard , it require 2/3 majority of both house of parliament to remove a HC judge , yogi cannot do anything to a HC judge
Very good. This should help people in power to keep their act intact and don't be egomaniac
Good decision by honourable court.. this type of decisions r need of d hour.. think about those poor pples who's life hs bcame even worse than jail because of this burocratic hurdles..
SSP doesn't salutes DM. DM is not direct boss of SSP, its DIG. DM has magisterial powers , which means , in order to use force , SSP needs DM permission first, also SSP reports to DM on law and order situations , but DM doesn't have operational control over police, once permission to use force is given by DM, it is upto SSP whether to use force and how to use it. SSP is more or less equal in rank to DM
DM Malik hota aur sp naukar..smz lo ye baat..
SP/SSP is not of the same rank as DM. Check your State's Order of Precedence. In my state, DM comes in rank 35 in Order of Precedence & SP/SSP comes 39. Even the SP/SSP's Annual appraisal report is given by the DM, which is always given by a senior officer. If an SP/SSP doesn't salute DM, that's because of their ego, but DM is a higher post than SP/SSP.
Well said
Police comes under DM as a tool to maintain law and order... Hence, SP/SSP reports to DM and in many states DM write the ACR of SP/SSP. SP/SSP has to salute DM but they avoid it by not wearing cap with uniform as you are not supposed to salute someone without wearing complete uniform which includes cap.
One has to salute magistrate nd administration... Even ssp will salute state sdm
Bilkul Sahi Kadam. ABSOLUTELY Right Step on the part of H.C. ESE HE SIDHE HONGE YE NIKAMMI HO CHUKI SARKARI MACHINERY.
Non bailable warrant against a DM will set a benchmark for those beurocrates who turned into a hypocrite
So now instead of government courts should keep finance portfolio in their control and they should decide the fund allotments of state and nation.
Ias power is decreasing day by day .
Nice😂😂
I want judges also to be held behind bars who give unnecessary verdict which eventually turns into a crime!! Example : many time judge gives bail to rape accused bcz of lack medical reports but later the victim is killed by the accused as soon he got bail!! So in this case judge should be taken under custody.
Sir according to 14th part of indian constitution ab DM ka legal expenses ka kharcha upsc karegi.
If a DM only acts according to the government executive verbal words without even applying his thoughts n wisdom,,then why is the requirement of an IAS officer at the post, a clerk may also serve the post of drafting the orders....!!
This incident proves courts and judiciary is going all out against any one who is working for a elected govt especially when it is a BJP govt. after all 70 saal walon ki ji Hajoori tho karni padegi na
DM ko Pension release kar dena chahiye tha..Sarkar ki petition ka decision court baad me leta , Agar decision sarkar ke favour me aata to pension amount ko recover kiya ja sakta tha..DM ne court decision ke upar apna decision liya jo court ke order ke against tha..Ye Contempt of court hai. Allahbad court ka sahi decision hai...
Paise toh government hi deti jo aate nhi tab bhi DM hi fas ta
@@Einstein_Kumar M.p. me bhi yahi haal hai..Arrier ka paisa bhul gayi sarkar 😂
He is not in authority to do so at his own will....it's being like neglecting government order and if he passed he would have got suspended with internal enquiry against him..
Paise toh sarkar hi deti naa aur agar ye de dete fir govt inko pakad leti ki hamare permission ke bina kyu kia aapne wo kaam kia..
What officers learned ? .. कि अब आगे से लोगो को गोल गोल घुमाना है, राज्य सरकार और कोर्ट के बीच ... खुद बीच मे नही पडना। लोग जाने, कोर्ट जाने, सरकार जाने ।
Sahi kaha..bas yhi hoga ab...court kachahari ki wajah se kabhi development nhi hoga...
Jaruri bhi hai Sir, aisehi agar Courts ke order ka contempt hota raha to courts ko log halke me lene lagenge aur court jane ke bajaay bribe dekar apna kaam karane ki koshish karenge. Court ki garima rehni chaiye itne badey democratic desh mein.
Courts ke order accountibility bear nhi krte....ise case mei hi dekh lo....
Yaha court ne order pass kr diya pension ka bina future consequences ko smjhe....as if on same grounds age thousands log pension lene lge....toh already budget deficit state ka bahut sa paisa sirf pension mei jaega ...
Aur smjho sarkar ka paisa nhi hota....ye paisa janta ka hota hai .... court should issue special statement this order is for exceptional circumstance this order will not effective with other case on same grounds
Judiciary ka EGO bahut hota h ...unko respect ki itni aadat ho gyi hoti h aur sab salam krte rehte to lagne lagta h bhagwan ban gye h...chhoti chhoti baat pr hyper hote huye dekha h judges ko!
Absolutely true .. 👌👌
True,A bill should be passed in the parliament so that IAS,IPS Officers should not get harassed so easily by the judiciary,after all Beaurocrats are the backbone of our country.
Arrest State govt. Ki honi chahiye, Because he is accoutable the most
आजकल कोर्ट व्यक्तिगत मुद्दे मुद्दों में ज्यादा उलझी रहती है वही सामाजिक मुद्दों को राम भरोसे छोड़े रहती है🙄
Contempt of court sucks
Govt should have some stance in this arrest or else DM acts are situational executions...their should be a clean path linked from judiciary to govt and it's officials...when the govt is telling not to give pension den court should ask directly the officials....about that review pettition..y should DM. Alone n individual responsible for the same...
On one hand its necessary for courts to get their decisions implemented and on another hand the executive and legislature branch has to see the larger repercussions of the decision taken. I wonder if judiciary takes everything into consideration. If Govt goes bankrupt paying pensions, how will any funds be left for development. Pensions are an important part for an individual but its also a curse for Govt. Why does only a Salaried person gets pension. A businessman cannot work in his old age, how does society expect him to stay alive without continuous source of income. Businessmen do avoid taxes in many cases by evading them. Govt should reduce income tax levied on Businessman and increase income tax levied on Govt employee to level the field.
it was very impressive and so informative.
Court took the right stance. These bureaucrats think they are above the law. But no one is above the law.
Judges should be held responsible for repercussions..Now it's a trend,they just sit and pass idealistic judgments and don't take the practical factors into the account..
बीच बीच मे ऐसी पनिश्मेंट अधिकारियो को होती रहनी चाहीये. इन का घमंड थोडा कम होता राहेगा ऐसें हादसो से..☺️☺️☺️👍
DM is at fault here clearly. DM should clearly enforce HC court orders first than government policy. Second mistake he did is he issued a order against the orders of high court. He should have enforced the orders of court and if some uper authority could have stopped the pension he could have atleast present his ground on court.
सुप्रीम कोर्ट का हाल ही में फैसला आया की आयुष डॉक्टर को एक एलोपैथी डॉक्टर के समान वेतन मिलना चाहिए लेकिन राज्य सरकारें इस को इंप्लिमेंट नही कर रहि हे ( हालाकि। फैसला उत्तराखंड के कर्मचारियों के लिऐ था) मगर सुप्रीम कोर्ट का फैसला होने से समान रूप में सभी राज्यों पर लागू होना चहिए?? अगर हां? तो क्या इसके लिऐ फिर से कोर्ट में जा सकते हे?? क्या हो सकता हे??
Court should hv issues a suo motto Constitutional writ of Mandamous and directed the DM.
This is misuse if powers by the court to issue arrest orders to DM.
What if people of executive start harassing Judges like wise?
Court doesn't hv the authority to humiliate Officers and in many cases officers are not responsible as they are constantly transferring.
#Update - The HC has recalled it's order after DM has submitted an affidavit on May 6 and has complied with order of the Hon’ble Court.
When the sword is pointed above their heads they immediately follow the orders. Hail ! to Judiciary for keeping these egoistic bureaucracy under control.
1. High Court was perfectly right in issuing Non Bailable warrant as the order issued by the DM on 18.04.2022 was unconstitutional and outside his limits when the order of High Court was clear and pending action since September, 2021.
The problem is that Bureaucrats have high ego problems.
2. The decision of HC on September 2021 was after an elaborate hearing, if the court have passed the judgment and the Bureaucrats were just playing delay tactics. It is wrong to say that Government was thinking of other 1000 people who were to claim pensions in future. It is not Government Ideology or arbitrary decisions which run a state office. A person who is eligible for pension must get it in any circumstances whether the number is in lakhs or thousands, these pensioners must have given their dedicated service to the government for almost 30 years.
3. The DM would have saved himself if Government had issued some order before September 2021 and he was not in authority to pass an order contradictory to HC Order even Chief Minister or Prime Minister don't have such powers. He could have easily moved to SC challenging such an order of HC.
This is judicial Overreach
If this continues, then I prefer dictatorship over democracy.
No one can become too smart be it judiciary or IAS
Most of them are those who couldn't qualify upsc but filled with ego n mediocrity
To give Pension or not ,it's not a judicial policy
Its policy of govt.
@@karansingh-ez6jc Definitely it is a government policy, which cannot be denied to one and granted to others, that's were Law comes in and do justice.
@@karansingh-ez6jc It seems you are a UPSC aspirant, what are your thoughts about IAS Pooja Singhal who was caught by ED after cracking UPSC. Cracking UPSC doesn't tell your merits as a human being. Judiciary has anytime better public trust than executives around the world. Many legal personalities left civil services to join legal profession. Judicial Overeach becomes necessary when the bureaucrats disturb the public, they are servants of public. Civil servants have to work under law.
@@AKOjhaji Judiciary must take action against such corrupt people who r termites.
Judiciary also plays a key role in improving the laws and government orders in public interest.
That is fair and just.
But this case is more reflective of ego.
They could have registered their concerns rather than issuing NBW.
Judicial activism is a good thing but Judicial Overreach isn't.
We dont have Parliamentary supremacy or executive supremacy or Judicial supremacy but Constitutional supremacy
Power of judiciary 🔥
What about this pathetic and lethargic judiciary that has failed to deliver justice to crores of Indians? Who will issue warrants against them and who will punish them for their crimes against humanity? These judges should be incarcerated for life.
Dil ki baat boldi bro
need more courts for speedy trials
Kya
Absolutely right .. 👌👌
Truee courts h but inka sarkari rutwaa dbb khraab krr deta h
Tehsil office ka bhi vahi haal h
Kaam ho jaane k baad bhi document nahi dete h namoone
Filling Review petition is not enough, unless a stay is granted on the previous order in the said review petition, one has to obey orders of the court. After all they have fought the case and won a battle in the court on merits, if the administration is in contempt, what can you expect from common citizen. DM should not pass an order which has disempowered/underpowered a HC order
Thank you !
Ilahabad High court's decision to giving non-bailable warrant is very necessary to show the power of judiciary and make change the rude manners of bureaucrats
वे 3 कर्मचारी ये अच्छी तरह से जानते है के वे बोहोत बाद में रेगुलर हुए है, और रेगुलर होने के बाद की सेवा अवधि के आधार पर वे पेंशन की पात्रता नही रखते है। ये जानते हुए भी की नियुक्ति के समय ही उन्हें ये बता दिया गया था की आप रेगुलर नही है, तब रोजगार पाने के उन्हे सब मंजूर था अब जब सेवा निवृत हो गए है तो इस प्रकार की याचिका लगाकर सरकार और कोर्ट का समय खराब करते है।
Even after Court orders if administrators are reluctant to implement court backed decisions then there's serious doubt on their capabilities to handle situations and pressure. In case they are not in a position to implement Honble Court orders then they should challenge that in High court or Supreme court
A hard slap on yogi govt by HC of allahabad
Navneet chahal sir need to give a petition against those higher authority who told him to do so.👍
This is rule of law 👍 chahe koi bhi ho ye hai hamare desh ki nyay vyavastha
Pehle 36 ka आकडा legislature vs Judiciary ke beech hai... Ab se Executive vs Judiciary ke beech. Kaha jaye kiske pass jaye. Fair justice ke chakkar me web series material mil gaya.
If He Filed Counter Response...And This Is A Valid Response That Govt. Filed Review Petition Regrading This...And He Has To Wait For That...He Can't Do Things Against The Decision Of Govt...So What Is Wrong...If There Is Anything Wrong Then Court May Notice Him To Present Before The Court....Why The Non Bailable Warrent..???
If Not As A DM...But As A Normal Person He Has Dignity....
Some Time I Feel Judiciary Day By Day Crossing Its Limit (Lakhsman Rekha) In The Name Of Independent Judiciary... Judicial Activism...Etc..Etc...
Ekdum sahi bat kahi... now i don't like civil services because of the way they are treated by judiciary.
@@tnverma_indiaIt's Not About The Civil Servants or Bureaucrats...It's About The Judiciary Vs Govt...Whic Isn't A New Thing...But The Bad Thing Is Always Govt. Servants...Police Etc..Are Becoming Soft Targets...
Govt. Is Staying In Its Limit Because There Is Judiciary For Checks n Balances...But In Other Hand There Is No Such Checks n Balances Or Limit On Judiciary... Neither There Is Any Role Of Govt. Nor There Is Any Role Of People In Appointment Process Etc...
Neither Judiciary Is A Elected Body Nor It Is Responsible To People Like Legislature n Executive...
Unfortunately If They Will Not Do Anything Regarding This Then Just Like Legislature n Executive.. Judiciary Will Loss Its Relevance.. Respect..Etc.. Which Will Definitely Be A Very Wrong Thing....
@@shuvendurout3576 yes i totally agree. Judicial transparency and accountability is the need of the hour. We want a nation lead by people that we chose ,not by someone just clearing a pcs exam. I will prefer controlled (by people) fool over uncontrolled intellectual to run the country.
is se pata chalta he court ka power.. kanoon se upad koi nehi.. isi tarah sakht hona chahiye taki sabko sabak mile
High court is like a small child who likes to cry 😂.
They can't even implement a civil decree and now they think they can implement a arrest warrant.
🤣🤣 court is taking it seriously, without considering the government,, bachhe ki trh ro rhi hai😅
@@nitinmishra3017 kuch pata laga DM ka ?
3 hafte ho gaye arrest warrant nikle hue kya hua??
@@piyushmishra1426 bhai arrest hue the ,, 12 may ko peshi thi,, age pta nhi
@@nitinmishra3017 bhai agar koi link h toh dikha do kyoki DM ko arrest karne ke liye state ki prior permission leni padti h aur is matter me state permission dega nahi.
@@piyushmishra1426 phle ye clear krna hai ki,, court ka order supreme ya state ki permission
Issuing office order against high court order is grossly wrong and bad in law.. poor fellow not advised well by legal department..and DM thought himself above the Honorable High Court..if DM does such things to High Court then what they must be doing to aam janta... arrival of real democracy by Court's orders..
Supreme court should fire all the corrupt DC's and corrupt magistrate .
Court khud ko Maharaj na samajh rehe hai... 🤔🤔independent matlab executive sath kuch bhi karega?
Aaj kal kuch jada hi power abuse kar rahi hai court.
Courts r bound to give justice to the ppl of india. Here everyone is doing their duty except govt.
Hum decisions pending krenge.
Murderes rapists ko bail denge 10 saal tak
Riots instability ko ignire krenge.
Hmare orders nhi manega use arrest kraynge. DM he kuna ho.
-we are indian judiciary
@@Manish-vf7cb Executive hi to der karte hain evidences dene me .
@@abhijeet4675 Executives? How?
Harshit sir with all due respect, but I think you have misunderstood some time line of the facts of the case.
In its September 2021 order, the Court had observed that the services rendered for a "very long period" cannot be ignored while computing qualifying services.
It was in this context, hearing the contempt petition in Feb 2022, the Court sought the response of the DM Mathura, and again ordered it to comply with the order of the Writ Court.
Pursuant to the above order of the Court, the DM Mathura filed a compliance affidavit filed before the Court enclosing an order passed by him on 18.04.2022, wherein, he had refused to grant the benefit of service rendered by the applicants prior to their regularization.
So the administrative order by the Respected DM of Mathura was passed after the response was asked by the Honbl HC seeking the reason for not implementing the previous dated order and again a reminder was made to comply with the order.
As far as review of the order is concerned, the court stated that:-
It is expected that the District Magistrate should know the basic principle of law that till the order has not been stayed, the order shall remain in force, and the authority is bound to comply with the order.
Thus, his later act of issuing an administrative order contrary to the current existing decision of the Highest Court of the state amounted contempt as the DM had no such overriding administrative power to do such an act, since until the court's decision was stayed the previous order was unconditionally applicable over the state.
Also Terming the order of the DM as nothing but an abuse of power on the part of the District Magistrate and which amounted to gross disrespect to the order of this Court, the Court further remarked thus:
" Though, normally this Court would have issued a nonbailable warrant, but in such glaring facts where the order of this Court has been violated with impunity, this Court cannot shut its eyes, and to uphold the majesty and dignity of the Court so that confidence of public may not erode in the judicial system, this Court finds it to be a fit and appropriate case in which non-bailable warrant is issued against the District Magistrate, Mathura who shall be produced in police custody on the next date fixed."
write in crisp and concise manner.
Correct 👍
@@Woyseng crisp and consise sometimes is not sufficient and warrants detailed facts so as to clear the misunderstanding of people like Harshit Dwivedi.
Great writing skills bro
@@mmdmm6 kya karne ae ho yaha jiski izza t nahi karte uski vedio me comment karne..... Dwivedi sir is great all his efforts and work is for providing knowledge to all students....money should not be a barrier for education.....sir has been trying to make it true.....
Sir, you presented the case as you are telling the story is a very good method please carry on, thank you, sir
good decision by the court respective everyone
Judiciary is very proactive in govt policies. If everything is decision is decided by court than there is no relevant of EC and Govt. Let's rules them court.
now the public prosecutor or who ever on behalf of the state should approach the supreme court to stay this NBW. then the PP should lead the case in the proceedings on behalf of the state
Power ka khel ho rha h ki kaun jyada powerful h judicery ya sarkar.CJI humesa say anti bjp rhte hai.
Andh bhakt pro bjp.
BJP ??? BJP is anti-India ..
Ab sarkar ko kuch aisa karna chahiye jisse judiciary ki Maa-behen ek ho jaye. Bahut ho gya inn judges ka natak. Aj toh CJI khule aam govt ko phatkar laga rahi hai. Kal dhamki dega aur manmani karega. Aukat mein rehna toh yehlog bhul gaye. Apne nepotism ko banaye rakhne k liye collegium system ko hatane nhi de rahe hai. Aisa lagta hai ab yeh judges sabse jyada corrupt hai. Bahut ghatiya judiciary ka halat hai iss desh mein.
Upsc ki tayari kar rahe ho kya?
Bjp it cell ki most probably
Netagiri se to achhi hi haalat h judiciary ki.
@@abhijeet4675 nopes
@@harshparmar1880 kyu problem hai kya ..?? Pura desh BJP chala rha hai.....toh phir desh chod do sabse pehle 🤣🤣🤣 apni aukat mein reh 2 kaudi k C
Thank you so much sir 🙏
Simple, RDC could notify DM's residence as prison and he could stay and work from home till then. DM didn't commit any serious crime. He is just the disbursing authority of Pension at district level. Issue of Pension has to be dealt with state Pension Dept, which is headed by another IAS officer of Principal Secretary Rank. It's easy for a court to issue an order to give the pension, but the question is we're is the funds to generate the pension ??
Thank You So Much Dear Harshit Sir 🙌🙌🙌🙌
Courts are going extreme after BJP came to power. This kind of dadagiri and targeting good officers should stop…
And it is the beauty of our Constitution law is for everyone irrespective of their post or power
It's duty of DM to teach Govt about jurisprudence
HC is right Bureucrates run government & they are totally responsible and bound to follow courts orders. Good step for preserving peoples rights.
I support it completely... legislative+ executive run the govt in reality ( not only executive) executive blindly support Netajj..now they will ask nEtaj ..why should i sign ..if i can get arrested broo
most bureaucrats live in their world and don't understand anyone before them..very much necessary
Excellent analysis well done
Sarkaar ke khilaaf bolo to ... UAPA.. sedition charges thok do...
Or courts ke khilaaf bolo to Contempt of court thok do... Kuch bhi ho... Courts/Govt nahi sudhrenge hum sahi hai to bas hai... Aapki emotions, justice delay, or wrong verdicts hamare liye kuch maayne nahi rakhte....
Why Monopoly in judiciary ? Only 125 family has hold in High/supreme Court
HIGHLY APPRECIATED
There should be law to even punish judge if they pass wrong judgement, few of judges in their old age are passing any judge's. Law should be respected not the once who is sitting there as judge.
Par sir jab tak previous court order pe stay na aajayae tab tak to DM ko previous order ko manna chahiye tha
very very very gud decision taken by court
salute those judges
Aisa lagta hain bno to sidha Supreme court ke Advocate bno nhi to Minister
Couts should not interfere in govt policy