Yea jaywalking and cycling are the REAL concern for Californians. Not the multi daily street parked car breaks ins, muggings, store theft or homelessness. Glad everyone can cross the street now without getting a ticket whoop whoop!
Worst part is they are making it easier for protestors to gridlock areas with people in the steets. When the railroad protests didnt work they decided they would change the laws. Edit: 2016-2018 455 reported cases of fatal cyclist accidents in california.. not just one city I mean every city.
OMG, 100,000 new laws on top of all other laws and regulations??? Laws and regulations exist due to a lack of common sense, and that says it all about Calicrazy. Calinutie is definitely going down.
Surprisingly, jaywalking is much safer than using a crosswalk. Probably because jawalkers know they have to look out for their own safety, whereas crosswalk users often just assume that all cars will stop.
Yup, I think they need to destroy all the E-bikes, those mofos don't no how to drive. All of them violate the law, by not stopping at a stop sign or cross without looking. Cause an accident or get pancaked.
Surprisingly, jaywalking is much safer than using a crosswalk. Probably because jawalkers know they have to look out for their own safety, whereas crosswalk users often just assume that all cars will stop.
I almost ran over a Jay walker a few nights ago. The logics in a person wearing all black in a not to well lit main road. With no decency to even wear something refletive so my light can see them crossing.
@@remindmesometime1855 It shouldn't be. But can you honestly, 100%, guarantee me, that not 1 single person is going to go out of their way to simply 'ignore' traffic and walk right out in front of someone, and DARE them to call the police on them for nearly causing an accident? Or that someone is not going to intentionally walk in front of a car, JUST so they can get 'bumped', then try to claim "well its legal for me to walk now, he wasn't paying attention! arrest him instead!." please.....
@@Gwydion_Wolf And that is what will really happen there is the scams. Where I live they already scam with car wrecks. In the earlier days when you could keep your doors unlocked at night sure we would not need jay walking laws but these days you do.
Also check those cyclist who don’t wear a helmet , no light or reflector vest at night…. Good god those who don’t do any of those think their immortal or have a death wish …..
It reminds me back in high school where they made the law that told people to wear helmets and my school kept reminding students to wear there helmets when riding a bike and guest what nobody really cared and rode without helmets.
Those bicycles need titles and registration along with a license plate on the front and back. Also all PPE should be worn at all times or will be given a ticket. Also will need a license for those bikes so will need you to take a training course after requiring your permit. Once training courses fully completed then you can purchase your license for your registered bicycle. Failure to do so will be automatic 30 days in jail or a 10,000 dollar fine.
My mother was visiting from New England last month. We saw a woman selling stuff she'd stolen from a dollar store on a table on the sidewalk. Mom asked, "Do people need a permit for that?" Sigh......
How many of these 100,000 new laws will involve the state taking more money out of our pockets one way or another and likely for something basic we already do without additional costs? Were they able to slip in a breathing tax somewhere? Can I still wear a purple shirt on Tuesdays or is there a fee for that? Amazing how many new laws were created in a year, especially considering how many work days our legislators have in that period of time.
@thefox47 how about the road but actually follow traffic laws? Like not blowing through stop signs and intersections, like cyclists like to say, share the road, but they never do. They think they're entitled to it.
my grandma was killed by a bicyclist on the sidewalk going as fast as he could he hit her coming out of a bakery he was high on meth and no charges filed 2020
@@indianatarzan8001 That's an interesting question. In New York it is a ticket able offense to not use a bike lane when available, unless the bike lane is blocked. I imagine the law in California will behave similarly. Also, if you are so concerned, you can look these laws up on the internet. They are publicly available.
@@indianatarzan8001 near where I live, Colima Road has a big bicycle lane but because it's a fast street, bicyclist ride on the sidewalk and small cars use the bicycle lane as a long right turn lane. What a waste of money.
@@blahbaconblah facts. Making a law that will cause more cars to move away from bicycle riders instead of staying close enough to hit them is going to save them. When I rode my bike I always moved to the sidewalk when a car came on the same lane less that a foot away from my bike and this was after I been in a bike accident hit by car so I'll have that same experience of getting to use the bike lane with cars around
@@David-ty5jk I race mountain bikes, and I ride to my local trails as a warm up before I begin practices. I have to travel about a mile on roads to get there from my house. Every day I get some dickhead honking at me, likely because he has no idea that it is illegal to drive within 3 feet of a cycle, and that I have right of way on the road. When driving I make it a point to always move as far away from cyclists as I can and drive slower when near them. It's in no way an inconvenience for me in a car to yeild to a cyclist.
If Friedman was so concerned with bicyclists, she’d fund bicycle lanes on every major thoroughfare and make it easier to transport bicycles on public transportation.
Or you know.. drivers and bicyclists actually paying attention to each other and not acting entitled to the road is a good start. We didn’t really need any laws for that when it comes down to peoples choices
Build sidewalks for cyclists then. In NY state here, we have the move over law which means that if a cop, firetruck, ambulance or emergency vehicle or even construction vehicle or tow truck with lights on, you must move over one lane to the left or slow down if not able to. Coming from NJ where it's allowed go pass a cop car on the side with lights on, I got a moving violation ticket.
*move over one lane for bicyclist? no thanks. How you expect me to move over one lane when there is only one lane. How about you have them move to over to the side walks.*
I'm sorry, e-bikes are motor vehicles and should not be on bike paths. Just because they have pedals doesn't make them any different from a moped or scooter.
Having cars stop and hesitate in order to move to the next lane just to give the cyclists more space sounds stupid. This new law may cause more altercations. Now a police officer may pull you over for passing by a cyclist and not moving over to a further lane though traffic may prevent that. More information would be nice.
you may have the right away..... good luck with that.... they have just intensified the anger of all of us to wards these idiots...who do not have jobs ..... not going to work well...
2020 will be the last time I voted. Elected officals are endangering the lives of every day residents. By defunding the police, removing anti camping laws, allowing homeless roam free & infest every area; just so these elected officals get more federal money. I'm working on a video of a woman I knew who became homeless, what she told me as I drove her to find section 8 housing, I'll post in 2023
Not voting doesn't solve any of your problems, and certainly can make your perceived issues go in the other direction on you. Go vote, it is important. I definitely don't agree with you, but I will still say you should vote.
@@BiggestMessiFan12334 I do agree with defunding police to a certain point, but only because they waste millions in tax payer dollars settling excessive force and corruption cases against them, and I definitely support removing qualified immunity from police. Also, Homeless people are not "everywhere" so I don't know what you mean.
@@blahbaconblah Nah, elected officals have shown me that my vote doesn't matter. By not disclosing fully what ballot measure is for to misuse of taxpayer money under a false flag narrative.
@@blahbaconblah Do you live in the L.A b/c it doesn't sound like you do. Crime rates have gone up sine police have been defunded. It's a catch & release w/ the scared cows of sociely: black, latinos, gay, homeless. Homeless are infesting neighborhoods like cockroaches, they get free ride on metro bus get off where ever set up tent cities.
Freedom to walk act How about the folks that can’t walk? Sort of an ableist law. People in wheel chairs can’t just roll up on the curb. This law is unlawful.
But driving to close to a rider on a ten speed is illegal yet it's okay to jaywalk? War on cars alert. People do run over bicycles and riders all the time. So they're right but if I want to just walk or run into the street it's ok???
What about night bike riders? What happens when THEY run into your car? They don’t have headlights on at night, so we can know they’re approaching if coming down a dark street? Especially the ones with the motors? Like it’s team work on the street, I look out for me and you but you also gotta look out for you and notice two bright lights at night (car) and not try to zoom pass it. We all do our part and no one gets into an accident, that’s how I see it. I tell my friend before he go skateboarding or biking, don’t expect vehicles to see you, especially at night. Even tho they should be looking around, but just don’t expect, so ride your bike for you and them. Be their set of eyes. Making sure you don’t get hit.
What about the driver being endangered by jaywalkers? I ride a motorcycle full time and I’ve almost been killed by jaywalkers. You mean to tell me that now I have to be on the lookout for random jaywalkers? Whoever thought of this idea needs their head checked! For some of us motorists, there are consequences!
@@blahbaconblah I had a similar thought. The person operating machinery in public complains about nearly being killed by his machinery colliding with a person and needing to be on the lookout? Perhaps a tricycle would be more appropriate?
@@thefox47545 yeah like a cyclist tax with registration at the dmv! cycle insurance in case of an accident!! they can make so much more money if they go this route.
I'm all for pedestrian safety and if you want to ride your bike I'm all for that, but, instead of making plans to upgrade the infrastructure to allow for cyclists to safely traverse the roads, they are going to impose a law that will fine drivers (that already pay super high road use taxes that are included at the pump and are supposed to go towards infrastructure development) for not giving way to someone who is technically impeding traffic (and also, probably if they don't drive, not paying the road use taxes) so that they can make more money to....not upgrade the infrastructure? California traffic is crappy enough, let's see how we can make it worse.
Uh, bicyclists are traffic, and the car in front of you is a greater impediment than a cyclist (unless it's some crazy person literally trying to be an impediment). But if you're going to unleash passion about obstructions, I hope you'll consider the fact that even when a cyclist obstructs a driver it's usually a short time before the driver can pass; and proceed at the desired pace. But not so with other cars.
@@6dmiller Not really sure where I "unleashed passion" about obstructions, I was actually trying to make a point that the roads need to be safer for cyclists and pedestrians and generally anyone that uses the public byways for any form of travel.
@@paulanderson8272 You said, "lets see how we can make it worse." Sounds to me like you are implying that putting in laws that help cyclists ride safe will somehow make your perceived issue worse. I can't help it if you fail basic diction and grammar. Your rant is pointless either way, and not exactly based in reality. It does not really matter if I missed your point, as I'm fairly certain it wasn't very well thought out to begin with.
@@David-ty5jk Davis I been. Saying Marshall for longtime dude you get me. But no homeless person don’t hurt me is their way of living and their action bruh they are infront of schools and business
@@thechosen7875 I mean it isn't smart to establish your camp in an area like that but who are you to tell them what to do when you haven't been out there like them and have had handouts like c'mon smh they gotta be outside daily there's no hiding from danger and suffering you just never knew anyone homeless or not related to them
@@David-ty5jk well how do you know that? I am writing it cause obvious reason… I been there sir. But not to the extreme how this folks are doing it, and I got my things together.
Well if you want to throw some common sense into the equation, maybe the “cyclist” should bear the responsibility to determine if the path they are choosing is safe. Too many times I have encountered these cyclist type people who seem to think the road is for them, not the cars. Gee, isn’t that money that I spend when registering my vehicle supposed to be used for the upkeep of roads in the state? How much do cyclist contribute to this fund? So very sad that common sense is the missing element in so many decisions made these days.
Bikes, ebikes and escooters are a huge problem on the sidewalks. I'm a pedestrian. My closest call was when I had no idea a silent scooter was racing past me from behind until I felt my clothes get sucked into the vacuum created. If I'd stepped slightly to the left at that moment, I'd have been seriously injured.
@@blacknbluegamer2979. Yes, they are. But before scooters were a thing, it was plain old fashioned bicycles that were the danger to folks walking on the sidewalk, because they approach from behind/fly by at speed, totally silently.
@@myoldvhstapes I agree with you what I mainly stating is if it doesn't have a motor in it it should stay on the sidewalk because where I live there is groups of bicyclers that don't pay attention behind them and are in the middle of the road and the right side of the road and it's just dangerous for them
100,000 new laws? Im sure every single one of them had the best interest of the people in mind. No way at all they’d sneak anything in there nefariously…
I'll sleep better at night knowing jaywalkers aren't going to be given citations unfairly. That's what keeps me up at night. These are the laws that are really going to turn cities around like L.A. and S.F.
The real problem is not the cyclists, but the scooter riding folk that block multiple lanes and don't follow traffic laws, like stopping at intersections.
Yeah, the problem with electric scooters, the rental ones anyway, is that they are usually rented by people that have no experience on scooters, especially when they go so fast! I used to work in an ER in Santa Monica and electric scooter accidents by inexperienced riders were very common.
OK but cyclists can whitestrip others by passing into lanes and weaving in and out of traffic when it's backed up with no tickets? So moving over makes it safe for them, but they make the roads unsafe.
@@jonathanfalkowsky672 Lane splitting is statistically safer for both cyclists and motorcycles. It prevents cyclists from being sandwiched between cars in a rear-ending accident which are very common at intersections.
Well, yes 1 store is closing bc of the homeless in that area (hey, elected city officials what are doing to help your constituates?) and blatant shoplifting. Although, homelessness is a national crisis, those responsible are the states Governor, the county Mayor & county office representatives and the city respresentive and city office officials and lawmakers within those branches. Sorry, I digress point being Big Lots (way too much coffee). Lots President and CEO Bruce Thorn said the Citrus Heights location is closing due to homeless & shoplifting. An employee said some people dial-up a cart and walk out and there's nothing they can do. She added that there's a "loophole" in the law that says anything below $950 in theft is only a misdemeanor (as opposed to a felony). Tough neighborhood. They have over 1,400 stores in 47 states, CA has the most with 149 stores followed by TX 115, FL 106, OH 101. In January, Big Lots announced plans to open appx 500 new stores in 2022 alone, had plans to open 50 stores, with 80 or more opening per year after that. Prior to that announcement, Big Lots had had a "flat store count" for a decade, noting that they were introducing a "store invention program" to reduce # of closures. However, the situation has changed and a # of closing stores is picking up. Dec 1st earnings call from 3rd fiscal quarter of 2022 inflation impacting customers' discretionary spending- particularly on big-ticket items-thus affecting the retailers performance in this quarter. Net sales down 9%, loss of 87 million, compared with just $4 million during same quarter last year. Revenue losses is driving store closures.
I received a jay walking ticket in California a few years back from a swat van. They made me sit on the curb and treated me like I had just robbed a bank. I think it ended up costing me $170
Yup I got one too right in front of my house and neighbors for crossing to speak to a old guy I knew from the hood. Took a year weighing on my shoulders to get dropped and then a few years later I decided to ride a bike for some exercise and got pulled over around the corner from my house. If you ain’t Asian then you can’t do nothing and get away with it. My Asian neighbors don’t have the same laws who ever knew. Over grown trees, people living in sheds so a house has 10 cars out front and they leave their trash cans out all week.
![Germany 1930s in color, Pre-War [60fps, Remastered] w/sound design added](/img/1.gif)
Yea jaywalking and cycling are the REAL concern for Californians. Not the multi daily street parked car breaks ins, muggings, store theft or homelessness. Glad everyone can cross the street now without getting a ticket whoop whoop!
Well that's why they changed it bud. I'm sure people watched the video sweetheart they know what changed
That must be the only state that has that law,here in the south cops would get laughed at
For real
Worst part is they are making it easier for protestors to gridlock areas with people in the steets. When the railroad protests didnt work they decided they would change the laws.
Edit: 2016-2018 455 reported cases of fatal cyclist accidents in california.. not just one city I mean every city.
OMG, 100,000 new laws on top of all other laws and regulations???
Laws and regulations exist due to a lack of common sense, and that says it all about Calicrazy.
Calinutie is definitely going down.
Almost 100,000 new laws! And the public is supposed to "just know" them all!
Well they better get started or else…
@@Rocket_Man. or else what??
Lol seriously 100k new laws is crazy
I know a lot of the California penal And vehicle code. Those are the most important
Calm down there Voltaire!
RIP all those people who jaywalk on busy roads and highways.
The horror of being responsible for your own safety when crossing the street
Places like San Francisco or Los Angeles is too crowded.This will definitely help stem the city’s growing population.Population control at its finest
Surprisingly, jaywalking is much safer than using a crosswalk. Probably because jawalkers know they have to look out for their own safety, whereas crosswalk users often just assume that all cars will stop.
Yup, I think they need to destroy all the E-bikes, those mofos don't no how to drive. All of them violate the law, by not stopping at a stop sign or cross without looking. Cause an accident or get pancaked.
RIP to all the motorcyclists that hit them!
Surprisingly, jaywalking is much safer than using a crosswalk. Probably because jawalkers know they have to look out for their own safety, whereas crosswalk users often just assume that all cars will stop.
I almost ran over a Jay walker a few nights ago. The logics in a person wearing all black in a not to well lit main road. With no decency to even wear something refletive so my light can see them crossing.
I agree
Dummy alert 🚨
🤓 i concur
Good point. 👍
California.
Legalizing Criminal activity more and more with each year!
Crazy how you think walking the earth should be a crime
@@remindmesometime1855 It shouldn't be. But can you honestly, 100%, guarantee me, that not 1 single person is going to go out of their way to simply 'ignore' traffic and walk right out in front of someone, and DARE them to call the police on them for nearly causing an accident? Or that someone is not going to intentionally walk in front of a car, JUST so they can get 'bumped', then try to claim "well its legal for me to walk now, he wasn't paying attention! arrest him instead!."
please.....
@@Gwydion_Wolf And that is what will really happen there is the scams. Where I live they already scam with car wrecks. In the earlier days when you could keep your doors unlocked at night sure we would not need jay walking laws but these days you do.
Also check those cyclist who don’t wear a helmet , no light or reflector vest at night….
Good god those who don’t do any of those think their immortal or have a death wish …..
No need for a helmet
It reminds me back in high school where they made the law that told people to wear helmets and my school kept reminding students to wear there helmets when riding a bike and guest what nobody really cared and rode without helmets.
@@himhim3344just like I don’t need a seatbelt but u don’t hear me complaining
Those bicycles need titles and registration along with a license plate on the front and back. Also all PPE should be worn at all times or will be given a ticket. Also will need a license for those bikes so will need you to take a training course after requiring your permit. Once training courses fully completed then you can purchase your license for your registered bicycle. Failure to do so will be automatic 30 days in jail or a 10,000 dollar fine.
You mean the bumps on the road?
Jaywalking no longer a crime.
And apparently shoplifting either.
wild wild west 😣
Imagine someone shotlifiting and then jaywalking after lol
My mother was visiting from New England last month. We saw a woman selling stuff she'd stolen from a dollar store on a table on the sidewalk. Mom asked, "Do people need a permit for that?" Sigh......
How many of these 100,000 new laws will involve the state taking more money out of our pockets one way or another and likely for something basic we already do without additional costs? Were they able to slip in a breathing tax somewhere? Can I still wear a purple shirt on Tuesdays or is there a fee for that? Amazing how many new laws were created in a year, especially considering how many work days our legislators have in that period of time.
man get a home office and shut up.
Freedom to walk act 😂
Its a good way to control the cities growing population lol 😂
Stupidest thing I've ever heard of
Woke glasses
100,000 new laws to take effect in 2023. Good job CA.
Thank you James C.
These Scumbags in the California Legislature need to go.
Crazy no new policy for homeless/drugs
Keep a votin for dem Dems !...
Im sure all the stoners can remember them all
F**** CYCLING..
Freedom to walk. & cross border.
that must be the Jaywalking law ,,nobody is going to empeed the traffic
ruclips.net/user/shortshQiPvcRRQvc?feature=share
Last year, Californians had a chance to remove newsom from office. But they didn't!!!!! They kept him!!!!!! THEY DESERVE HIM!!!!!!
The thing is Californians move to other States that they left just to ruin them .
100k new laws? what's the other 99.9999k ones🤔
Exactly 💯. Why did they only tell us 2 of the most irrelevant laws???
100,000 new laws for 2023??....God damn!!
No manchen
Lol glad I don't live in California!!
2 that might be enforced
And 3 are for law abiding citizens 😅
@Alex Gomez don’t say stupid
Bicyclist need to be licensed and follow rules and use hand signals. They should also have to license their bicycle
As a cyclist I'm ok with that BUT will it actually make drivers be for careful of cyclist? I don't think so.
Who comes up with all this crap ???...
They treat it like they're 100,000 missed call voicemails. Like you'll get thru all of them... eventually 😂
So she did just say 100,000 new laws??? Yeah, things are looking GREAT for the future.
Cyclist were already thinking the own the road smh
AND the sidewalks.
@@myoldvhstapes People don't want us riding on the road, AND the sidewalk? Where do we ride?
Well people don't want us on the sidewalk either, just look at the 1st reply of your comment. Where do we ride?
Cyclists and drivers both own the road equally. How do you not know that?
@thefox47 how about the road but actually follow traffic laws? Like not blowing through stop signs and intersections, like cyclists like to say, share the road, but they never do. They think they're entitled to it.
What stupid laws
What about a law to fix these fk’d up roads?
my grandma was killed by a bicyclist on the sidewalk going as fast as he could he hit her coming out of a bakery he was high on meth and no charges filed 2020
Oh, my condolences!!! As a pedestrian, the lack of any enforcement for bikes, ebikes and escooters on the sidewalks is a threat to me.
@@myoldvhstapes Not all cyclists are high on meth.
Bruh I'm tired of California and it's laws and top officials. I'm out of here
Which side of the street does that bicycle law pertain to? Ever try driving near the beach on a busy weekend?
Cyclists are subject to the same laws as motor vehicles. You can be ticketed for riding a bike against traffic if its found to be reckless.
I wonder if that bicycle law applies when there's a freaking bike lane that the cyclist should be using.
@@indianatarzan8001 That's an interesting question. In New York it is a ticket able offense to not use a bike lane when available, unless the bike lane is blocked. I imagine the law in California will behave similarly. Also, if you are so concerned, you can look these laws up on the internet. They are publicly available.
@@indianatarzan8001 near where I live, Colima Road has a big bicycle lane but because it's a fast street, bicyclist ride on the sidewalk and small cars use the bicycle lane as a long right turn lane. What a waste of money.
This will make everything worse. There will be MORE jaywalker vs auto accidents and there will be MORE bicycle vs auto accidents.
How will a law that forces drivers to move over cause more bike vs car accidents?
@@blahbaconblah facts. Making a law that will cause more cars to move away from bicycle riders instead of staying close enough to hit them is going to save them. When I rode my bike I always moved to the sidewalk when a car came on the same lane less that a foot away from my bike and this was after I been in a bike accident hit by car so I'll have that same experience of getting to use the bike lane with cars around
@@David-ty5jk I race mountain bikes, and I ride to my local trails as a warm up before I begin practices. I have to travel about a mile on roads to get there from my house. Every day I get some dickhead honking at me, likely because he has no idea that it is illegal to drive within 3 feet of a cycle, and that I have right of way on the road. When driving I make it a point to always move as far away from cyclists as I can and drive slower when near them. It's in no way an inconvenience for me in a car to yeild to a cyclist.
This will cull the herd. The entitled and the stupid will be the most negatively impacted.
What about murder ?
is that still a no-no ?
Another way to cars off the road. Stop voting dem.
Did you, did you have a seizure while writing that comment? Seems like you skipped a word. 😂😂😂
100,000 NEW LAWS in california… wtf?
I could only imagine what laws they slipped in there. I guess we will all find out soon. 😱😱😱It's California nothing is too much for them.
If Friedman was so concerned with bicyclists, she’d fund bicycle lanes on every major thoroughfare and make it easier to transport bicycles on public transportation.
Or you know.. drivers and bicyclists actually paying attention to each other and not acting entitled to the road is a good start. We didn’t really need any laws for that when it comes down to peoples choices
Freedom to walk act ? More like Freedom to get hit by an Uber act 😂
I lot of people are going to get run over.
Pretty much
Compared to how many get run over now?
Build sidewalks for cyclists then. In NY state here, we have the move over law which means that if a cop, firetruck, ambulance or emergency vehicle or even construction vehicle or tow truck with lights on, you must move over one lane to the left or slow down if not able to. Coming from NJ where it's allowed go pass a cop car on the side with lights on, I got a moving violation ticket.
The same law applies in California, but rarely is there enforcement.
*move over one lane for bicyclist? no thanks. How you expect me to move over one lane when there is only one lane. How about you have them move to over to the side walks.*
the law literally stipulates "when possible". You can't actually be that dumb.
Pedestrians don't want us on the sidewalk either so take it up with them.
Get ready for even worse traffic in California.
Also check those cyclists that don’t stay in the bike lane and try to take the car lane when there’s like 10 cyclists together.
Gotta do what you gotta do 🚴🚴
I absolutely despise cyclists.
On another note , crime will sky rocket due to these New Laws scheduled to take effect next year 🤣😂🤣
LA stopped enforcing laws years ago.
I'm sorry, e-bikes are motor vehicles and should not be on bike paths. Just because they have pedals doesn't make them any different from a moped or scooter.
Having cars stop and hesitate in order to move to the next lane just to give the cyclists more space sounds stupid. This new law may cause more altercations. Now a police officer may pull you over for passing by a cyclist and not moving over to a further lane though traffic may prevent that. More information would be nice.
Yeah. Sounds like total bs if you ask me
Seems like more chaos from this just like every other law was for good intentions
Human speed bumps 100 points for each of them
Good luck enforcing all these laws
LA stopped enforcing laws years ago.
They add in these bs fluff laws so the cops get more freedom to detain people whenever they feel like it
you may have the right away..... good luck with that.... they have just intensified the anger of all of us to wards these idiots...who do not have jobs ..... not going to work well...
You need to get out of your car more and get some fresh air; it will help with that anger issues you have.
2020 will be the last time I voted. Elected officals are endangering the lives of every day residents. By defunding the police, removing anti camping laws, allowing homeless roam free & infest every area; just so these elected officals get more federal money. I'm working on a video of a woman I knew who became homeless, what she told me as I drove her to find section 8 housing, I'll post in 2023
Not voting doesn't solve any of your problems, and certainly can make your perceived issues go in the other direction on you. Go vote, it is important. I definitely don't agree with you, but I will still say you should vote.
@@blahbaconblah you agree with defunding the police, homeless people being everywhere?
@@BiggestMessiFan12334 I do agree with defunding police to a certain point, but only because they waste millions in tax payer dollars settling excessive force and corruption cases against them, and I definitely support removing qualified immunity from police.
Also, Homeless people are not "everywhere" so I don't know what you mean.
@@blahbaconblah Nah, elected officals have shown me that my vote doesn't matter. By not disclosing fully what ballot measure is for to misuse of taxpayer money under a false flag narrative.
@@blahbaconblah Do you live in the L.A b/c it doesn't sound like you do. Crime rates have gone up sine police have been defunded. It's a catch & release w/ the scared cows of sociely: black, latinos, gay, homeless. Homeless are infesting neighborhoods like cockroaches, they get free ride on metro bus get off where ever set up tent cities.
Give people on bikes riding in the middle of the street more space?!?!?! WTF is going on, seriously this is starting to get scary
WOW! More laws for the Cops not to enforce! Yah.
Freedom dies not with a bang, but with limp-wristed bureaucracy.
Freedom to walk is also freedom to die.
Freedom to walk act
How about the folks that can’t walk? Sort of an ableist law. People in wheel chairs can’t just roll up on the curb. This law is unlawful.
As a wheelchair useri can tell you it isn't ableist. Just don't jay walk and use cross walks . It's not that complicated
@@brooke9225 It is. Why can't wheelchair users jaywheel up curbs? The state should start making jaywheeling accessible for the wheelchair bound.
But driving to close to a rider on a ten speed is illegal yet it's okay to jaywalk? War on cars alert. People do run over bicycles and riders all the time. So they're right but if I want to just walk or run into the street it's ok???
What about night bike riders? What happens when THEY run into your car? They don’t have headlights on at night, so we can know they’re approaching if coming down a dark street? Especially the ones with the motors? Like it’s team work on the street, I look out for me and you but you also gotta look out for you and notice two bright lights at night (car) and not try to zoom pass it. We all do our part and no one gets into an accident, that’s how I see it. I tell my friend before he go skateboarding or biking, don’t expect vehicles to see you, especially at night. Even tho they should be looking around, but just don’t expect, so ride your bike for you and them. Be their set of eyes. Making sure you don’t get hit.
More stupid laws by this state 😅
Tell that to the dirty cops
You know an anchor has skills when she can read the line "100,000 new laws" with a straight face.
More Zombies will now throw themselves into traffic with no fear of repercussions! Great!
What about the driver being endangered by jaywalkers? I ride a motorcycle full time and I’ve almost been killed by jaywalkers. You mean to tell me that now I have to be on the lookout for random jaywalkers? Whoever thought of this idea needs their head checked! For some of us motorists, there are consequences!
precisely. Even when i drive on the freeway, there are signs that say, “Always look out for pedestrians”
You have to use your eyes when driving?!?!?! What outrage!
@@blahbaconblah I had a similar thought. The person operating machinery in public complains about nearly being killed by his machinery colliding with a person and needing to be on the lookout? Perhaps a tricycle would be more appropriate?
@@6dmiller I think they are feigning outrage. Complaining and pretending to be victims.
But Fentanyl is going absolutely bonkers there.
Nobody is selling fentanyl at employed peoples jobs. If you have one you have nothing to worry about
That second one is just common sense I been doing that for years...
Respect to others and all surroundings.
That's why I like California. The gun laws are a little iffy but they get it.
With all the homeless clogging up the sidewalks with tents and poop buckets you have to walk in the street anyway.
100,000 new laws, clearly it eventually gets to the point as what is too much?
Number One: NEVER wash your iron skillet with soap.
Seriously
Out of all the problems in CA, they chose jay walking and bicycling..
No wonder this state is failing
WELL IF CYCLIST HAVE ALL THESE RIGHT MAYBE THEY SHOULD PAY A SMALL FEE FOR USING OUR ROADS, 🤨 JUST SAYING
if the cyclists have to pay to use the road, so should you
Well, I pay city taxes already that pay for roads, are you saying we have to pay more?
@@thefox47545 yeah like a cyclist tax with registration at the dmv! cycle insurance in case of an accident!! they can make so much more money if they go this route.
@@speeddemon002 I'm OK with that, but would that make drivers more careful of cyclist? I don't think so.
@@thefox47545 you know how people are, lol
100,000 new laws taking effect and what do they talk about? Jaywalking and bikes 🙄
Instead of being tougher on law breakers California keeps reducing the severity of punishments or removing them completely. Glad I left.
Part of it is to let the entitled and the stupid deal with the consequences.
Bicycles should pay dmv registration fees! I don’t want to hear anyone complain that most bicycles own vehicles. Not even true..
I'm all for pedestrian safety and if you want to ride your bike I'm all for that, but, instead of making plans to upgrade the infrastructure to allow for cyclists to safely traverse the roads, they are going to impose a law that will fine drivers (that already pay super high road use taxes that are included at the pump and are supposed to go towards infrastructure development) for not giving way to someone who is technically impeding traffic (and also, probably if they don't drive, not paying the road use taxes) so that they can make more money to....not upgrade the infrastructure? California traffic is crappy enough, let's see how we can make it worse.
Bikes have always been on the roads... calm down.
Uh, bicyclists are traffic, and the car in front of you is a greater impediment than a cyclist (unless it's some crazy person literally trying to be an impediment). But if you're going to unleash passion about obstructions, I hope you'll consider the fact that even when a cyclist obstructs a driver it's usually a short time before the driver can pass; and proceed at the desired pace. But not so with other cars.
@@blahbaconblah never said that they weren't. Thanks for missing the point. 👍👍
@@6dmiller Not really sure where I "unleashed passion" about obstructions, I was actually trying to make a point that the roads need to be safer for cyclists and pedestrians and generally anyone that uses the public byways for any form of travel.
@@paulanderson8272 You said, "lets see how we can make it worse." Sounds to me like you are implying that putting in laws that help cyclists ride safe will somehow make your perceived issue worse. I can't help it if you fail basic diction and grammar. Your rant is pointless either way, and not exactly based in reality. It does not really matter if I missed your point, as I'm fairly certain it wasn't very well thought out to begin with.
why dont they quit letting violent criminals out of prison....
Because if they didn't who would?
Ever think of that smart guy?
If they have that new law for jay walking anywhere, where is the new law where you can hit jay walkers?
this is a huge win for e-bike providers!
100k new laws.... lol because so many criminals abide by the other 2074293429364173 laws 🤡
There are not 100k new laws. According to Newsweek, there are just under 1k new laws set to take effect in 2023 in CA. Just as unbelievable however.
I thought we were all Law-ed Up in '22
but I was mistaken
Thank Goodness our leaders are On The Job
Gavin Newsom's handy work.
Is that an attempt at a diss?
@@blahbaconblah Don’t worry about it.
@@QuickStix26 It's not a worry, just curiosity. Trying to figure out how misinformed you are.
They should made this law anybody in a tent or homeless will get cited and can or will serve time
Sounds like marshall law lol somebody sounds like they were hurt by a homeless person
@@David-ty5jk Davis I been. Saying Marshall for longtime dude you get me. But no homeless person don’t hurt me is their way of living and their action bruh they are infront of schools and business
@@thechosen7875 I mean it isn't smart to establish your camp in an area like that but who are you to tell them what to do when you haven't been out there like them and have had handouts like c'mon smh they gotta be outside daily there's no hiding from danger and suffering you just never knew anyone homeless or not related to them
@@David-ty5jk well how do you know that? I am writing it cause obvious reason… I been there sir. But not to the extreme how this folks are doing it, and I got my things together.
100,000 new laws, it's like you're making new laws for every variation of the multiverse or something...
New law for cycles and walkers because they can’t use the sidewalks. They are occupied by the homeless. But that’s not a problem.
Trash the bike and get a ev hummer
And spend as much as a gas cars. Yup, that totally makes sense. ruclips.net/video/ORKuZxrFr6A/видео.html
As if hit and runs weren't bad enough..
Well if you want to throw some common sense into the equation, maybe the “cyclist” should bear the responsibility to determine if the path they are choosing is safe. Too many times I have encountered these cyclist type people who seem to think the road is for them, not the cars. Gee, isn’t that money that I spend when registering my vehicle supposed to be used for the upkeep of roads in the state? How much do cyclist contribute to this fund? So very sad that common sense is the missing element in so many decisions made these days.
Cyclist rule the streets love my bike
@@whiterun9101 Yeah, it’s that ego-maniac mentality that causes the problem. And no…cyclists don’t rule the streets.
@@Redhotchicky1 🤣
Just let nature take its course.
@@db-rc5fr thats right
Insane. It's gonna make road more dangerous.
100k new laws ?? Holy crap
i mean....bicyclist can always stay on the pathway which is safer SIDEWALKS
Bikes, ebikes and escooters are a huge problem on the sidewalks. I'm a pedestrian. My closest call was when I had no idea a silent scooter was racing past me from behind until I felt my clothes get sucked into the vacuum created. If I'd stepped slightly to the left at that moment, I'd have been seriously injured.
@@myoldvhstapes no just basic Bikes is what i ment as them riding on the road cuss safty issues for drivers
@@blacknbluegamer2979. Yes, they are. But before scooters were a thing, it was plain old fashioned bicycles that were the danger to folks walking on the sidewalk, because they approach from behind/fly by at speed, totally silently.
@@myoldvhstapes I agree with you what I mainly stating is if it doesn't have a motor in it it should stay on the sidewalk because where I live there is groups of bicyclers that don't pay attention behind them and are in the middle of the road and the right side of the road and it's just dangerous for them
100,000 new laws? Im sure every single one of them had the best interest of the people in mind.
No way at all they’d sneak anything in there nefariously…
We need that handgun roster abolished
I'll sleep better at night knowing jaywalkers aren't going to be given citations unfairly. That's what keeps me up at night. These are the laws that are really going to turn cities around like L.A. and S.F.
Congratulations to California on becoming India... hehe
Wyatt Earp retired there. #SoItMakesSense On the books, off the books. And don’t murder people, gunfights and stuff, can’t change that one Alcatraz.
Give cyclist more space, when cars don't have space
Thank You Gavin Newsom you are making California Safer every day you are in office , Newsom 2024!!!
What about homeless people and there campers????
what about them? blame the weather and the lack of natural predators. Move to the suburbs or stay out of the city
It’s simple to stop all the Bicycle accidents completely: don’t use a bicycle :👍🏻 fixed
The real problem is not the cyclists, but the scooter riding folk that block multiple lanes and don't follow traffic laws, like stopping at intersections.
Yeah, the problem with electric scooters, the rental ones anyway, is that they are usually rented by people that have no experience on scooters, especially when they go so fast! I used to work in an ER in Santa Monica and electric scooter accidents by inexperienced riders were very common.
OK but cyclists can whitestrip others by passing into lanes and weaving in and out of traffic when it's backed up with no tickets? So moving over makes it safe for them, but they make the roads unsafe.
Lane splitting is not illegal in California, nor is it unsafe.
@@blahbaconblah it should be. Dangerous
@@jonathanfalkowsky672 Lane splitting is statistically safer for both cyclists and motorcycles. It prevents cyclists from being sandwiched between cars in a rear-ending accident which are very common at intersections.
Roads are meant for cars, not bicycles........ DUH
Lets make 500,000 more new laws
Homeless closed down 36 biglots in Southern California
Well, yes 1 store is closing bc of the homeless in that area (hey, elected city officials what are doing to help your constituates?) and blatant shoplifting. Although, homelessness is a national crisis, those responsible are the states Governor, the county Mayor & county office representatives and the city respresentive and city office officials and lawmakers within those branches. Sorry, I digress point being Big Lots (way too much coffee).
Lots President and CEO Bruce Thorn said the Citrus Heights location is closing due to homeless & shoplifting. An employee said some people dial-up a cart and walk out and there's nothing they can do. She added that there's a "loophole" in the law that says anything below $950 in theft is only a misdemeanor (as opposed to a felony). Tough neighborhood.
They have over 1,400 stores in 47 states, CA has the most with 149 stores followed by TX 115, FL 106, OH 101. In January, Big Lots announced plans to open appx 500 new stores in 2022 alone, had plans to open 50 stores, with 80 or more opening per year after that. Prior to that announcement, Big Lots had had a "flat store count" for a decade, noting that they were introducing a "store invention program" to reduce # of closures. However, the situation has changed and a # of closing stores is picking up. Dec 1st earnings call from 3rd fiscal quarter of 2022 inflation impacting customers' discretionary spending- particularly on big-ticket items-thus affecting the retailers performance in this quarter. Net sales down 9%, loss of 87 million, compared with just $4 million during same quarter last year. Revenue losses is driving store closures.
Hell no i will never ride my bike on the road especially in California
100,000 new laws. 99% slipped in last minute without citizens knowing them.
Shouldnt the cop write a ticket to the bicyclist on the road
No, cops are there to kneel on peoples necks they don't have time to be writing tickets
Bicycles are perfectly legal on the road...
a cyclist's mere existence is a menace.
@@Sozzzled You don't understand the word "menace". Just because a bicycle triggers your fragile emotions, does not make a cyclist a menace.
I received a jay walking ticket in California a few years back from a swat van. They made me sit on the curb and treated me like I had just robbed a bank. I think it ended up costing me $170
That's ridiculous smh
Yup I got one too right in front of my house and neighbors for crossing to speak to a old guy I knew from the hood. Took a year weighing on my shoulders to get dropped and then a few years later I decided to ride a bike for some exercise and got pulled over around the corner from my house. If you ain’t Asian then you can’t do nothing and get away with it. My Asian neighbors don’t have the same laws who ever knew. Over grown trees, people living in sheds so a house has 10 cars out front and they leave their trash cans out all week.