I created a propulsion method that reduced my craft's gravitational attraction relative to the surrounding medium, thereby generating an upward velocity.But it turned out, someobody had already invented ballons.
Excited for the Space Elevators episode next Thursday! The original Space Elevators episode was actually the first video I watched on this channel back in August 2017. That video made me realize I’d discovered a channel that dives deeper into these topics than the usual pop-sci content. I remember being blown away by the idea of attaching multiple tethers to a space elevator-something I hadn’t come across before. That’s when I knew this channel was the perfect fit for me.
An Infinitum Drive? Using a petawatt laser or higher to create dense matter/energy or black hole singularity that lasts long enough to pull and then dissipates?
Four minutes in: "Picture this tether as being made of virtual gravitons." Oh, it's going to be one of _those_ episodes then. Alright, I'm ready for my weekly brain-stretching.
The ship at the 18:45 mark in this video I JUST saw posted in relation to all the drone nonsense on tiktok. Someone had added a voice to it of someone sounding all scared and confused. Regardless, great video! Always love the content:)
This is actually the first time I've heard a proper explanation of the Oberth Effect. So many talk only about KE rising with the quare of Δv and that's it, not even mentioning how the planet fits into the equation (pun not intended). I've been wondering about it for a while now, so big thanks!
Humanity might one day learn to manipulate gravity, but I doubt it would be a free meal. Probably like countering any force requires equal energy input and efficiency wouldn't be perfect either.
17:35 Don't forget what happened when a slab of cavorite fell over. The air over the slab found itself under high pressure but was no longer held that way by gravity. It shot upward violently, and air from the edges rushed it to replace the air that had shot upwards, but it too shot upwards. It kind of sucked.
7:40 Launching from the Earth, you aim for a point south of the South Pole and maybe a little ahead of it when you meet up with the Moon. The Moon draws you into a polar orbit so that you can land anywhere on the Moon.
My favorite example of a gravity drive was from a trilogy called The Trigon Disunity by Michael C. Kube-McDowell. The books are named Emprise, Enigma, and Empery. They're from the 80s and a few minor details early on don't age well but overall the concepts are fascinating. It starts by introducing a solution to the Cold War called the Fission Blanket that renders fissile material inert, triggering the Food and Fuel Wars when additional energy sources don't work out. After science is pretty much outlawed, we get a message from the stars, and first contact is unsettling and familiar. Highly recommended.
I'm a fan of gravity lasers. Having one similar to the one in David Brin's Earth would be bonkers, even if we have to put all the energy into it by ourselves.
I always liked the weapon in the series by David Weber snd David Drake. A gravity beam an inch wide that very rapidly switched direction, ripping away matter caught in it.
But is gravity a force, or is it an effect? If what we perceive as gravity is only the warping of space due to great mass(the earth), then it is an effect that can not be generated.
@01:09 just how does the astronaut in the environmental suit with a closed helmet use the mustard? This is an important colonization question. How will you eat in space or on a colony when you can't open the visor?
I published a peer-reviewed paper on gravitation in 2008. It’s essentially a quantum theory of gravity. My hypothesis is that gravity is inherently repulsive. It only appears to be an attractive force due to how gravitons interact with other matter. I also link gravity to inertia as well as EM radiation
Our understanding of gravity and possible manipulation of it is key in humanities ability to venture out into the depths of our universe. I was born to early.
Within low earth orbit, if you extend conducting cables from a spacecraft you can work with the earth's magnetic field to (slowly) add to your orbital velocity, though it takes energy.
Imagine being able to cancel the effects of gravity. doing so the entire galactic local group just leaves you behind imagine how fast and random your direction is going to be? hahahaha
So the difference between the dark energy drive and a warp drive is that the DE drive just deletes space in front of it and recreates it behind whereas warp drives just squish and stretch? That would allow FTL without any energy loss (of course you would probably have some losses due to the second law of thermo and need to add energy or else cause tidal forces that would destroy your ship, also it’s probably impossible anyways, still fun)
If gravitational waves can experience gravitational lensing, could a large complex dynamic arrangement of dense materials (a mega-structure meta-material if you will) be used as a form of propulsion by creating a virtual gravity source ahead of the center of mass of the structure built from the redirected gravitational waves coming from external sources? Or would all the effort in redirecting the gravitational waves end canceling out the pull from the virtual gravity source? Could this get an extra boost from passing close to strong sources of gravity, taking advantage of their relative speed to "produce" an apparent gravitational wave it then redirects in the desired direction of motion?
Slingshot process doesn't only add planet's velocity, and "no gain relative to the planet" isn't exactly the case. It's somewhat true, however mathematically, you have more time falling than the time of leaving because you spend lesser time decelerating relative to the time you accelerate and it could be way easier to show on graph rather than comment. I would expect from famous Isaac Arthur that explanation as well.
I don't suppose solar sails are viable designs, because you'll always have to push the craft against the Sun's gravity, and perpendicular to orbital velocity. A similar yet far efficient effect could be achieved at much lighter setup using a laser propulsion. Say you have a light enough power source, and a strong enough diode, you could point the laser at the direct angle to the orbital trajectory, and push forward adding to your speed. When talking about light propulsion people usually think about solar sails only, and forget about the first law of thermodynamics and first law of motion. due to both of these first rules, not only the sail, but also the 'laser' will have tiny amount of thrust. Electrons convert to photons at diode, and shoot out with momentum. That initial conversion that gives momentum to photon will also backfire, meaning the laser diode would also be affected, not only the sail. So you can forget the sail, build the tiny laser on cubesat instead of giant ground laser, and observe it's propulsion. Of course, it'll be so much less than Ion propulsion in terms of TWR, or TPR (Trust-to-Power) ratio, as an educated electrical master guess, I'd have way more Isp, if the power source is sustainable enough. Since we don't have solar sails neither, why not try from the more practical design? I'm not sure if anybody wrote thesis about it however. I'll check the database later.
When a star collapses into a black hole and it's density becomes absolute doesn't that shift the strength of gravity towards the black hole? Which would shift and lower the strength of gravity that is holding a nearby planet in orbit? Like a gravitational wave pushing the planet out to a larger orbit? A wave of gravity that pushes away instead of pulls toward? Anti-gravity?
Catch a pair of neutron stars orbiting each other and slingshot across that. Might be interesting. Just by orbiting the sun we are matching it's orbital speed around the galaxy. I don't know how fast that is.
How do you keep your globe of negative matter together when gravity is trying to rip it apart? I guess a small enough negative mass wouldn't be a problem, but I would think you would need a fairly large one to get the effect you're talking about. Also, why wouldn't the positive and negative gravity cancel each other out rather than make the negative chase the positive?
@@isaacarthurSFIA IIRC, there is one model of negative matter that, if it contacts regular matter, results in a zero-energy annihilation of both just at the point of contact. If such negative matter can hold an electrostatic charge, though, it could be contained by an opposite charge on the container walls.
Bit fishy I was never taught General Relativity in my physics degree. Special, yes. Plus I can confirm the live weight/ dead weight concept, it's not just mass and gravity, but more like living in a transform. With focus you can convert a dead weight to a live weight and lift heavier, but not ridiculous stupid.
I'm impressed with how gravity can help spacecraft move, but I don't understand why we aren't focusing on more practical methods to replace fossil fuels on Earth before looking for ways to travel to distant planets. #cosmicchroniclestv
hmm, so if the higgs boson give particles mass and Mass interactions with spacetime curves spacetime thus giving the Gravity "reaction" force, then wouldn't anti Higgs Bosons, if they exist, give particles anti-mass, thus anti-Gravity with the interaction of anti-mass with space time?
Yes. But they reflect on metals and need to be reflected at low angles. X-rays are at the wavelength of Angstrom scale. If you shoot it directly at the mirror it will mostly diffract, refract and leave at the other side. X-ray diffractometers reflect x-rays to create a concise and small beam. Basically x-rays are small enough to go directly through matter if you let them do so.
@vidal9747 So...Yes, But no. ... We could maybe use it in a laser drive(Light as propellent...) But currently no Light battery. Not with mirrors, at least...
Does it disturb anyone else that despite decades of very smart people thinking about physics beyond the Standard Model, GR, and QM there seems to be not even a strong hint of what comes next (if any) in the foundations of physics?
@@tommiest3769 The clearest historical example is the turn of the twentieth century. No one was expecting a new physics breakthrough with some going so far as to suggest that all that was left was calculation. Yet there were unsolved problems that did lead to several revolutionary additions to physics. * there was no theory of gravity despite several attempts * the theoretical ultraviolet explosion of black body radiation needed some modification to the underlying theory to prevent it * the photo electric effect didn’t fit in the theoretical models The last two were some of the keys to unlocking quantum mechanics since they both required quantization to explain fully. The first was solved by general relativity. Note that outside of physics, and even for some in the field, these were seen as minor or esoteric problems. Are there equivalent problems today? Certainly, dark matter and dark energy are two that come to mind immediately. Neither have accepted, clear solutions yet.
@@robertadsett5273 Dark Matter is probably bullshit. Isn't it convenient that someone created an inhomogeneous amount of an undetectable matter? It is just weights to fit a model that is incomplete. In crystallography we have weights to fit parts of the model created by the spherical approximation for form factors, anomalous dispersions and other factors. The difference is that we know those weights are not reality. We didn't create a "dark crystal particle" to explain that our models are not that precise. We also developed better models that make the necessary weights smaller. The difference is that we have neutron diffraction to keep our models in check. Astrophysics has no cross-validation. So, they took a flaw in the theory and assumed it wasn't their problem, but a particle physicist's problem. Dark matter is nothing more than Shelx weights for the universe.
dont we already know gravity has the speed of light like if the sun disappeared, we wouldnt start flying away before we see it no longer be there so while you could possibly use it to make an energy efficient form of propulsion you cant use it to go fast enough to be relevant
Anti-Gravity is as important as FTL. Being able to build whole cities/living space on planets regardless of their gravity with gravity mats creating 1G! Of course walking around comfortably on your ship or space habitat with 1G! Gravity mats/gravity plating would also give us far more options in the design of space habitats!
Question Isaac...even if gravity was purely attractive... could there be a different force that could counteract its effect on space time? Like the field responsible for cosmic inflation? I mean... like even if they were two different forces/quantum fields, could they both influence the same thing which is the fabric of space time?
If gravity is the weakest force, then why can't we use one of the other forces in opposition to gravity to aid in space flight? Like say using magnetism like with trains. Note: The Earth has a giant ball of molten iron at it's core if we used a magnet with the opposite polarity to at least partially levitate a space ship that should greatly reduce the cost of launching into space.
*(A)* Opposite magnetic poles *attract* each other. So one would have to use similar poles. *(B)* The only viable launch points would be right on top of the north and south magnetic, not geographic, poles. And they move. *(C)* The repulsive force decreases with the square of the distance. Levitation enough to make a launch difference would take a prohibitively large amount of power.
" gravity is a force" four words in and you're 100% wrong. Gravity is not a force. There's a curvature of spacetime caused by the presence of mass and energy, but that's different than a force acting at a distance. In Einstein's General Theory of Relativity, massive objects like planets and stars create distortions in the fabric of spacetime, and what we perceive as gravity is actually objects following curved paths, or geodesics, within this warped spacetime.
If you have a Tube, and you spin it with the length being the axis, wouldn't that be a frame dragging inside it? Which then... Wouldn't that reduce the vacuum energy-mass in that space volume? I.E. negative energy?
He Isaac farwal this is a new elevator let's built it like the infrastructure in a circling touwer up from the surfis of 3de make it connect one viecle to the other and make them shifty and rotated giving the viecles to ethoter and go up you know what I'm saying a gravety lift like the GeForce slingshot viecles round the elevator and up a screw driver lift
Gravity is a pushing force and is the reason we are able to walk upright. Gravity pushes against gravity. Anti Gravity is an attractive force. Gravity and Anti Gravity attract each other where Gravity and Gravity repel each other. No such thing as a gravitron, that is a dumb persons need to have some particle to work with because they do not know how to deal with fields or waves.
Time travel is literally illegal All things must be done on a linear time line, relative to the gregorian calendar, which is based on astrology from ancient Egypt. Which is kind of an analogy, for real-time, which is a spiral. If you interrupt the spiral, and break the time continuum, you can get brain damage, or worse. You can create vehicles that distort time, but you do this, inside a bubble, or relative to, real time... even at light speed, it's all relative to real time. If you try and warp, you are basically warping your DNA. Don't travel back or forward in time Use time to move through space Or use space to move through time. Don't use time to travel through time. You can use space to travel through space, but it takes a long time. Time is light, and Space is matter
By it do you mean gravity? If so that’s trivially false. If magnetism was responsible for gravity then the force of gravity would change based on the material’s magnetic properties
I created a propulsion method that reduced my craft's gravitational attraction relative to the surrounding medium, thereby generating an upward velocity.But it turned out, someobody had already invented ballons.
Bro that’s called buoyancy 😂
@@SopaDeLenguaAnd it does not reduce gravitational attraction. Just creates an upward force that's larger.
@@Virtueman1But it's still a gravitic technology. It's simply powered by displacement.
Excited for the Space Elevators episode next Thursday! The original Space Elevators episode was actually the first video I watched on this channel back in August 2017. That video made me realize I’d discovered a channel that dives deeper into these topics than the usual pop-sci content. I remember being blown away by the idea of attaching multiple tethers to a space elevator-something I hadn’t come across before. That’s when I knew this channel was the perfect fit for me.
Remember, friends don't let friends use reactionless drives.
Good advice from RocketCat and Burnisde. I don't see anything stopping even a negative mass drive from being used as a relativalistic kill missile.
Well, except in those cases where your drive works via inertia or energy manipulation.
I was working on a gravitic spaceship drive--but then things got really busy at work.
?
An Infinitum Drive? Using a petawatt laser or higher to create dense matter/energy or black hole singularity that lasts long enough to pull and then dissipates?
_"...but, then I got high!"_
I know the feeling 😔 Only couple of weeks away from defeating the forces of nature.
@@tkermi Yes! and just for the record, I suspect those forces of nature got it comin'
Love listening to these while working. Makes the shift seem less dull. Thanks for the videos.
Right on bedtime! Sweet interstellar propulsive dreams y'all!
Four minutes in: "Picture this tether as being made of virtual gravitons."
Oh, it's going to be one of _those_ episodes then. Alright, I'm ready for my weekly brain-stretching.
„Virtual gravitons“. It’s so wrong on so many levels
Doc, that’s heavy!
Marty, what happened to the gravity in the future?!?!
Dude, your graphics are so quality now. I love it
Prob using sora for some of them? If not you should try it, I think it would make some very nice visuals for this channel
As a person who increases the biosphere’s mass by 180 lb, i can confirm i can propel a spaceship.
I was just looking for a good introductory video to show your channel to a friend when I got the notification for this one. It’s PERFECT!
Thank you ❤
The ship at the 18:45 mark in this video I JUST saw posted in relation to all the drone nonsense on tiktok. Someone had added a voice to it of someone sounding all scared and confused.
Regardless, great video! Always love the content:)
This is actually the first time I've heard a proper explanation of the Oberth Effect. So many talk only about KE rising with the quare of Δv and that's it, not even mentioning how the planet fits into the equation (pun not intended). I've been wondering about it for a while now, so big thanks!
Happy Birthday, Jean!! Giving this kid of yours a passion for science has truly changed the world!
Heavy stuff.
Gravity is quite attractive to everyone.
Humanity might one day learn to manipulate gravity, but I doubt it would be a free meal. Probably like countering any force requires equal energy input and efficiency wouldn't be perfect either.
17:35 Don't forget what happened when a slab of cavorite fell over. The air over the slab found itself under high pressure but was no longer held that way by gravity. It shot upward violently, and air from the edges rushed it to replace the air that had shot upwards, but it too shot upwards. It kind of sucked.
Great show as always. Happy birthday to your awesome mom!
7:40 Launching from the Earth, you aim for a point south of the South Pole and maybe a little ahead of it when you meet up with the Moon. The Moon draws you into a polar orbit so that you can land anywhere on the Moon.
My favorite example of a gravity drive was from a trilogy called The Trigon Disunity by Michael C. Kube-McDowell. The books are named Emprise, Enigma, and Empery. They're from the 80s and a few minor details early on don't age well but overall the concepts are fascinating. It starts by introducing a solution to the Cold War called the Fission Blanket that renders fissile material inert, triggering the Food and Fuel Wars when additional energy sources don't work out. After science is pretty much outlawed, we get a message from the stars, and first contact is unsettling and familiar. Highly recommended.
Happy Birthday, Mom!
We cannot confirm or deny the existence of such systems. :)
P.S. Happy Birthday to your Mom. :)
I'm a fan of gravity lasers. Having one similar to the one in David Brin's Earth would be bonkers, even if we have to put all the energy into it by ourselves.
The concept of consuming space in front and excreting it behind tickles at my scatological humor bone, but sounds like almost plausible Clarke-tech.
Waiting for your video this beautiful Sunday her in London Uk Isaac you are the GOAT! Love your videos
I always liked the weapon in the series by David Weber snd David Drake. A gravity beam an inch wide that very rapidly switched direction, ripping away matter caught in it.
Can’t wait for space elevators and hermit shoplifter
The aforementioned Isaac Arthur!
A most informative Sunday episode, Isaac.
But is gravity a force, or is it an effect? If what we perceive as gravity is only the warping of space due to great mass(the earth), then it is an effect that can not be generated.
If you can curve space, you can generate gravity.
@01:09 just how does the astronaut in the environmental suit with a closed helmet use the mustard? This is an important colonization question. How will you eat in space or on a colony when you can't open the visor?
I published a peer-reviewed paper on gravitation in 2008. It’s essentially a quantum theory of gravity. My hypothesis is that gravity is inherently repulsive. It only appears to be an attractive force due to how gravitons interact with other matter. I also link gravity to inertia as well as EM radiation
Just one problem, there are no gravitons.
Our understanding of gravity and possible manipulation of it is key in humanities ability to venture out into the depths of our universe.
I was born to early.
I really enjoyed this video Isaac. I'm seriously thinking of writing science fiction one day.
Would electomagnetism be useful as a possible drive in space?
Within low earth orbit, if you extend conducting cables from a spacecraft you can work with the earth's magnetic field to (slowly) add to your orbital velocity, though it takes energy.
Can virtual particles be used for propulsion?
@@RobbieRoach-u7l That one's way over my head. No idea. Sorry.
Stuff like this is why I like the Mass Effect games.
An awesome dream! That there will come a future by & by,
when ships will launch by levitating slowly toward the sky.
Imagine being able to cancel the effects of gravity. doing so the entire galactic local group just leaves you behind imagine how fast and random your direction is going to be? hahahaha
How much acceleration can we sustain when floating neutrally buoyant in fluid?
The interia cancelling potenial of gravitational manipulation tech has always been fascinating for me.
So the difference between the dark energy drive and a warp drive is that the DE drive just deletes space in front of it and recreates it behind whereas warp drives just squish and stretch? That would allow FTL without any energy loss (of course you would probably have some losses due to the second law of thermo and need to add energy or else cause tidal forces that would destroy your ship, also it’s probably impossible anyways, still fun)
If gravitational waves can experience gravitational lensing, could a large complex dynamic arrangement of dense materials (a mega-structure meta-material if you will) be used as a form of propulsion by creating a virtual gravity source ahead of the center of mass of the structure built from the redirected gravitational waves coming from external sources? Or would all the effort in redirecting the gravitational waves end canceling out the pull from the virtual gravity source?
Could this get an extra boost from passing close to strong sources of gravity, taking advantage of their relative speed to "produce" an apparent gravitational wave it then redirects in the desired direction of motion?
Happy birthday, mama Jean!
Disjointed drive tech is used in the Flinx/Commonwealth universe by Alan Dean Foster.
Slingshot process doesn't only add planet's velocity, and "no gain relative to the planet" isn't exactly the case. It's somewhat true, however mathematically, you have more time falling than the time of leaving because you spend lesser time decelerating relative to the time you accelerate and it could be way easier to show on graph rather than comment. I would expect from famous Isaac Arthur that explanation as well.
I don't suppose solar sails are viable designs, because you'll always have to push the craft against the Sun's gravity, and perpendicular to orbital velocity. A similar yet far efficient effect could be achieved at much lighter setup using a laser propulsion. Say you have a light enough power source, and a strong enough diode, you could point the laser at the direct angle to the orbital trajectory, and push forward adding to your speed.
When talking about light propulsion people usually think about solar sails only, and forget about the first law of thermodynamics and first law of motion. due to both of these first rules, not only the sail, but also the 'laser' will have tiny amount of thrust. Electrons convert to photons at diode, and shoot out with momentum. That initial conversion that gives momentum to photon will also backfire, meaning the laser diode would also be affected, not only the sail. So you can forget the sail, build the tiny laser on cubesat instead of giant ground laser, and observe it's propulsion.
Of course, it'll be so much less than Ion propulsion in terms of TWR, or TPR (Trust-to-Power) ratio, as an educated electrical master guess, I'd have way more Isp, if the power source is sustainable enough. Since we don't have solar sails neither, why not try from the more practical design?
I'm not sure if anybody wrote thesis about it however. I'll check the database later.
When a star collapses into a black hole and it's density becomes absolute doesn't that shift the strength of gravity towards the black hole? Which would shift and lower the strength of gravity that is holding a nearby planet in orbit? Like a gravitational wave pushing the planet out to a larger orbit? A wave of gravity that pushes away instead of pulls toward? Anti-gravity?
This might be how the Mandalorian got to another star system without a hyperdrive
Catch a pair of neutron stars orbiting each other and slingshot across that.
Might be interesting.
Just by orbiting the sun we are matching it's orbital speed around the galaxy.
I don't know how fast that is.
In Futurama they "don't move the ship, we move the universe"
I've never been so early
How do you keep your globe of negative matter together when gravity is trying to rip it apart? I guess a small enough negative mass wouldn't be a problem, but I would think you would need a fairly large one to get the effect you're talking about. Also, why wouldn't the positive and negative gravity cancel each other out rather than make the negative chase the positive?
It should be containable inside a normal container, its not antimatter.
@@isaacarthurSFIA IIRC, there is one model of negative matter that, if it contacts regular matter, results in a zero-energy annihilation of both just at the point of contact. If such negative matter can hold an electrostatic charge, though, it could be contained by an opposite charge on the container walls.
Bit fishy I was never taught General Relativity in my physics degree. Special, yes. Plus I can confirm the live weight/ dead weight concept, it's not just mass and gravity, but more like living in a transform. With focus you can convert a dead weight to a live weight and lift heavier, but not ridiculous stupid.
I'm impressed with how gravity can help spacecraft move, but I don't understand why we aren't focusing on more practical methods to replace fossil fuels on Earth before looking for ways to travel to distant planets. #cosmicchroniclestv
and what about gravpulse jet engine?
hmm, so if the higgs boson give particles mass and Mass interactions with spacetime curves spacetime thus giving the Gravity "reaction" force, then wouldn't anti Higgs Bosons, if they exist, give particles anti-mass, thus anti-Gravity with the interaction of anti-mass with space time?
And aother answer here reminded me...
Can we *reflect* X-rays?
I'm thinking of using them for a Coogerblits(?) Black hole, or rather, battery.
Yes. But they reflect on metals and need to be reflected at low angles. X-rays are at the wavelength of Angstrom scale. If you shoot it directly at the mirror it will mostly diffract, refract and leave at the other side. X-ray diffractometers reflect x-rays to create a concise and small beam. Basically x-rays are small enough to go directly through matter if you let them do so.
@vidal9747
So...Yes, But no.
...
We could maybe use it in a laser drive(Light as propellent...) But currently no Light battery. Not with mirrors, at least...
0:18 While I really liked the high detail in the planetary animation, the scale was so terrible the effect was ruined. Space is BIG. Really big.
Gravity is simply the lack of empty space. It's really that simple
all pointing to the Casimir effect 😊
Add blocker 👍
Does it disturb anyone else that despite decades of very smart people thinking about physics beyond the Standard Model, GR, and QM there seems to be not even a strong hint of what comes next (if any) in the foundations of physics?
Nope. If you look at the history of physics that’s always been the case.
@@robertadsett5273 I think I know what you are getting at, but could you please be more specific?
@@tommiest3769 The clearest historical example is the turn of the twentieth century. No one was expecting a new physics breakthrough with some going so far as to suggest that all that was left was calculation.
Yet there were unsolved problems that did lead to several revolutionary additions to physics.
* there was no theory of gravity despite several attempts
* the theoretical ultraviolet explosion of black body radiation needed some modification to the underlying theory to prevent it
* the photo electric effect didn’t fit in the theoretical models
The last two were some of the keys to unlocking quantum mechanics since they both required quantization to explain fully.
The first was solved by general relativity.
Note that outside of physics, and even for some in the field, these were seen as minor or esoteric problems.
Are there equivalent problems today? Certainly, dark matter and dark energy are two that come to mind immediately. Neither have accepted, clear solutions yet.
@@robertadsett5273 Dark Matter is probably bullshit. Isn't it convenient that someone created an inhomogeneous amount of an undetectable matter? It is just weights to fit a model that is incomplete. In crystallography we have weights to fit parts of the model created by the spherical approximation for form factors, anomalous dispersions and other factors. The difference is that we know those weights are not reality. We didn't create a "dark crystal particle" to explain that our models are not that precise. We also developed better models that make the necessary weights smaller. The difference is that we have neutron diffraction to keep our models in check. Astrophysics has no cross-validation. So, they took a flaw in the theory and assumed it wasn't their problem, but a particle physicist's problem. Dark matter is nothing more than Shelx weights for the universe.
Gravity is a harness
dont we already know gravity has the speed of light
like if the sun disappeared, we wouldnt start flying away before we see it no longer be there
so while you could possibly use it to make an energy efficient form of propulsion
you cant use it to go fast enough to be relevant
Anti-Gravity is as important as FTL. Being able to build whole cities/living space on planets regardless of their gravity with gravity mats creating 1G! Of course walking around comfortably on your ship or space habitat with 1G! Gravity mats/gravity plating would also give us far more options in the design of space habitats!
Question Isaac...even if gravity was purely attractive... could there be a different force that could counteract its effect on space time? Like the field responsible for cosmic inflation?
I mean... like even if they were two different forces/quantum fields, could they both influence the same thing which is the fabric of space time?
We are coming for you Isaac🌎👽🌎👽🌎👽🌎👽🌎👽
Gravity is a 4th dimensional force that we will never understand
until AI catches up and "dumbs down" what gravity really is.
Isaac have you seen the stuff about the aliens and the congress whistleblower meeting?
I doubt IA has any interest in or time for such histrionics and mass delusions.
In early this time! Thanks Isaac!
Red shift is tired light, not expansion.
If gravity is the weakest force, then why can't we use one of the other forces in opposition to gravity to aid in space flight? Like say using magnetism like with trains.
Note: The Earth has a giant ball of molten iron at it's core if we used a magnet with the opposite polarity to at least partially levitate a space ship that should greatly reduce the cost of launching into space.
*(A)* Opposite magnetic poles *attract* each other. So one would have to use similar poles.
*(B)* The only viable launch points would be right on top of the north and south magnetic, not geographic, poles. And they move.
*(C)* The repulsive force decreases with the square of the distance. Levitation enough to make a launch difference would take a prohibitively large amount of power.
Hey hey Isaac & friends . Comment 22 .
5:35 Ummm...either I'm going insane, or you need to check your dates.
First, back to basics: where are the videos of a mass falling in a vacuum, with accurate timing, distance over 60 meters, on planet Earth?
You can't "borrow" orbital energy. When you borrow something, that implies you will be returning it
Yes, you steal it.
No, you liberate it. Power to the people!
Gravitic sounds like a Croatian footballer playing for some mid tier Bundesliga team
👌
Space station by Chrysler
🛸
This is what we need to explore our solar system. Elon doing amazing stuff,but we need gravity tech to be in the public domain Isaac!! Mars we go!!!
Leon Skum isn't doing sh|t.
I was gonna create a new propulsion tech but then i got high
2:19 I already have the ability to manipulate gravity. Check out my large mass y’all!!! 😂😂😂
Dayum... Shake that mass.
Topical
Bob Lazar approves of this video
I am working on uncertainty entanglement drive based on the floor clutter principle.
Gravity is NOT a force !
And this is my church
All Gravity drives are a form of time drive ?
No, but all FTL drives would potentially allow for time travel, under certain circumstances
Gravitic propulsion is easy, _if_ you understand how gravity *really* works...
BOB.
👉👽👈
Have you accepted J.R. "Bob" Dobbs as your personal sales representative?
" gravity is a force" four words in and you're 100% wrong. Gravity is not a force. There's a curvature of spacetime caused by the presence of mass and energy, but that's different than a force acting at a distance. In Einstein's General Theory of Relativity, massive objects like planets and stars create distortions in the fabric of spacetime, and what we perceive as gravity is actually objects following curved paths, or geodesics, within this warped spacetime.
If you have a Tube, and you spin it with the length being the axis, wouldn't that be a frame dragging inside it?
Which then... Wouldn't that reduce the vacuum energy-mass in that space volume?
I.E. negative energy?
He Isaac farwal this is a new elevator let's built it like the infrastructure in a circling touwer up from the surfis of 3de make it connect one viecle to the other and make them shifty and rotated giving the viecles to ethoter and go up you know what I'm saying a gravety lift like the GeForce slingshot viecles round the elevator and up a screw driver lift
What the hell did he say?????
Gravity is down?
Gravity is up as much as down.
@@rvsonthelevel8746 that means I was at least 50% correct
@@anticlaassic Glass half full baby! lol
@ that is the kind of optimism I like!
What a lot of bollocks
Gravity is a pushing force and is the reason we are able to walk upright. Gravity pushes against gravity.
Anti Gravity is an attractive force. Gravity and Anti Gravity attract each other where Gravity and Gravity repel each other.
No such thing as a gravitron, that is a dumb persons need to have some particle to work with because they do not know how to deal with fields or waves.
Time travel is literally illegal
All things must be done on a linear time line, relative to the gregorian calendar, which is based on astrology from ancient Egypt.
Which is kind of an analogy, for real-time, which is a spiral.
If you interrupt the spiral, and break the time continuum, you can get brain damage, or worse.
You can create vehicles that distort time, but you do this, inside a bubble, or relative to, real time... even at light speed, it's all relative to real time.
If you try and warp, you are basically warping your DNA.
Don't travel back or forward in time
Use time to move through space
Or use space to move through time.
Don't use time to travel through time.
You can use space to travel through space, but it takes a long time.
Time is light, and Space is matter
The voice has a bad effect on me, can't watch this.
Then I suggest you avoid the Bene Gesserit.
It is actually magnetism
By it do you mean gravity? If so that’s trivially false. If magnetism was responsible for gravity then the force of gravity would change based on the material’s magnetic properties